Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.

Plant Physiol, January 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 8-11

SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Modulation of Guard Cell Plasma Membrane Potassium Currents by Methyl Jasmonate1


Nicola H. Evans2 *

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom


    ARTICLE
TOP
ARTICLE
LITERATURE CITED

Previous studies have suggested a role for jasmonates in the promotion of stomatal closure (Raghavendra and Reddy, 1987; Gehring et al., 1997). This report describes whole-cell patch-clamp experiments that demonstrate that methyl jasmonate (Me-JA) has concentration-dependent effects on guard cell K+ channels and promotes stomatal closure by biasing potassium transport at the plasma membrane for K+ efflux.

Stomatal closure is brought about by a reduction in guard cell solutes. Potassium salts are abundant in guard cells (Outlaw, 1983) and many regulators of stomatal movements, such as ABA, exert their activity, at least in part, through the modulation of potassium fluxes (MacRobbie, 1981; Blatt, 1990). Concentrations of jasmonates increase in response to stresses that alter water status and necessitate a change in stomatal aperture (Creelman and Mullet, 1995; Lehmann et al., 1995). In the majority of species investigated, jasmonates have been implicated in the control of stomatal movements by their effects on transpiration (Leshem et al., 1994; Wang, 1999), gas exchange (Lee et al., 1996; Herde et al., 1997), and stomatal aperture (Raghavendra and Reddy, 1987; Gehring et al., 1997). However, little is known about the mechanisms by which jasmonates affect stomatal behavior.

To investigate the effect of Me-JA on guard cell plasma membrane K+ channels in patch-clamp experiments, Vicia faba guard cell protoplasts were prepared by enzymatic digestion (Lemtiri-Chlieh, 1996). Protoplasts were perfused with 10 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MES, and sometimes 20 mM potassium Glu (pH 5.5, 480 or 520 mOsmol kg-1). Patch pipettes prepared from Kimax-51 glass (Kimble/Kontes, Vineland, NJ) contained 200 mM potassium Glu, 2 mM K2ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.6-8, 520 mOsmol kg-1). Once the whole-cell configuration was obtained, the membrane was clamped close to K+ equilibrium potential (EK) and no current measurements made for 2 min. Recordings were only made when the seal resistance exceeded 1 GOmega . Currents were monitored using a Dagan 3900A or Axopatch 200A Integrating Patch Clamp Amplifier (Dagan Corporation, Minneapolis; Axon Instruments Inc., Union City, CA). Voltage commands were given and signal recordings assessed by microcomputer using pClamp 6.0 software (Axon Instruments Inc.). The microcomputer and amplifier were connected via an input/output device and current traces low pass filtered at 5 kHz before analog to digital conversion. Liquid junction potentials were corrected for as described by Neher (1992). Me-JA (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) was a racemic mixture and solubilized in ethanol. Student's t tests and analysis of variance were performed to compare current characteristics and channel conductance before and after Me-JA application.

Me-JA was added to the bath solution at three different concentrations (0.1, 1, and 50 µM). At 0.1 µM, Me-JA led to an increase in the magnitude of the outward potassium current (IKout) and a decrease in the magnitude of the inward potassium current (IKin; Fig. 1). These changes in current magnitude reflected significant changes in the chord conductance of Kout and Kin (Kout, 64 mV: P = 0.02; Kin, -196 mV: P = 0.001) as illustrated in Table I, which contains mean relative conductance values for both channels (the ratio of the conductance post- to prior Me-JA application). No voltage sensitivity of either channel to 0.1 µM Me-JA could be detected within the voltage ranges described in Table I (Kout: P = 0.91; Kin: P = 0.735).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Effect of 0.1 µM Me-JA on IKout and IKin. Data from a typical guard cell protoplast. a, Electrical recordings made in response to a series of 600-ms voltage pulses (above) ranging in 20 mV steps from 64 to -196 mV (holding potential -76 mV). Recordings were made before (left) and at the times indicated after Me-JA had been added to the bath. Scale: vertical, 250 pA; horizontal, 200 ms. b, IKout and IKin (the time-dependent component of the current traces in a) plotted as a function of membrane potential. Cross-referenced to part a by symbol.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I.   Significant changes in the conductance of Kout and Kin evoked by Me-JA are concentration dependent and voltage independenta

In the majority of experiments (16 of 20), the effect of 0.1 µM Me-JA on IKout and IKin was detected within 15 min of exposure. This is illustrated in Figure 1 where electrical recordings made from a typical guard cell protoplast are shown. Ten minutes after the addition of 0.1 µM Me-JA, IKout has clearly already increased. In this example, Kin is slower to respond than Kout, but a decrease in inward current at -176 and -196 mV can be detected 20 min after the addition of the growth regulator.

The activation and deactivation kinetics of both currents were examined after the addition of 0.1 µM Me-JA (Tables II and III). Although the activation time constant for IKout was voltage dependent (P = <0.001), no effect of 0.1 µM Me-JA on the activation time constant for either current could be detected (Kout: P = 0.786; Kin: P = 0.572). Deactivation kinetics were examined after the return of the membrane potential to the holding potential from a series of activating voltage pulses. There was no significant effect of Me-JA on any of the deactivation time constants (P >=  0.1), regardless of the magnitude of the conditioning voltage step (data not shown, P >=  0.26).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II.   Me-JA does not affect the activation time constant of IKout or IKina


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III.   Me-JA does not affect the deactivation kinetics of IKout or IKina

The only other concentration of Me-JA tested to have a significant effect was 50 µM Me-JA (Table I). This concentration of Me-JA led to a significant reduction in the steady-state conductance of Kout (Table I; P = 0.01). Considering the effect of 0.1 µM Me-JA on this conductance, the data suggest Me-JA may have a bimodal effect on Kout. However, jasmonates have not been reported to have a corresponding dual effect on stomatal movements and unlike the other concentrations tested, 50 µM Me-JA is vastly in excess of estimates of jasmonate concentrations in planta (Creelman and Mullet, 1997). Pollen and seed germination, root growth, and cell division have all been reported to show a bimodal response to jasmonates when the concentrations tested have included those in excess of the physiological and the significance of the generally inhibitory effect of such supraoptimal concentrations is unclear.

The changes in the chord conductance of Kout and Kin evoked by 0.1 µM Me-JA would increase the capacity for K+ efflux across the guard cell plasma membrane and decrease the capacity for K+ influx. This suggests that Me-JA is capable of promoting a net loss of potassium from the guard cell cytoplasm and by this mechanism, stomatal closure. This is consistent with the findings of Raghavendra and Bhaskar Reddy (1987), who reported a significant reduction in the potassium content of isolated Commelina benghalensis guard cells after a 4-h incubation in 1 µM Me-JA. It has also been suggested that the ability of jasmonic acid to accelerate pulvinar movements in Cassia fasciculata (Bourbouloux et al., 1994) and inhibit light-induced turgor increases in Mimosa pudica pulvini (Tsurumi and Asahi, 1985) may result from comparable effects on K+ channels in these cells.

Single-channel studies are now required to determine if Me-JA directly affects the conductance of Kout and Kin or whether additional signal transduction components are involved. Cytosolic alkalinization precedes jasmonate-induced stomatal closure in Paphiopedilum spp. and acid loading of the guard cells eliminated this response (Gehring et al., 1997). This would suggest some overlap between jasmonate and abscisic acid signal transduction pathways (Blatt and Armstrong, 1993). The likely involvement of cytosolic calcium is entirely speculative in the absence of any measurements of jasmonate-induced increases in cytosolic calcium in guard cells. However, calcium has been implicated in other jasmonate-dependent processes (Leon et al., 1998; Kenton et al., 1999) and jasmonates are known to alter the activity of at least one calcium transport protein in mammalian systems (Starling et al., 1994).

The ability of Me-JA to alter the properties of potassium conductances in the guard cell plasma membrane has now been demonstrated. Aims for the future must be to investigate how these effects of Me-JA are mediated and under what conditions such control is important.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank Prof. Enid MacRobbie, Dr. Stephen Roberts, and Dr. Martin McAinsh for comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

Received September 4, 2002; returned for revision October 1, 2002; accepted October 13, 2002.

1 This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (studentship to N.H.E.).

2 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom.

* E-mail N.Evans{at}lancaster.ac.uk; fax 01524-843854.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.014266.


    LITERATURE CITED
TOP
ARTICLE
LITERATURE CITED

  • Blatt MR (1990) Planta 180: 445-455[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Blatt MR, Armstrong F (1993) Planta 191: 330-341[ISI]
  • Bourbouloux A, Fleurat-Lessard P, Roblin G (1994) Plant Cell Physiol 35: 389-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 4114-4119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 355-381[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Gehring CA, Irving HR, McConchie R, Parish RW (1997) Ann Bot 80: 485-489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Herde O, Peña-Cortés H, Willmitzer L, Fisahn J (1997) Plant Cell Environ 20: 136-141[CrossRef]
  • Kenton P, Mur LAJ, Draper J (1999) J Exp Bot 50: 1331-1341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lee TM, Lur HS, Lin YH, Chu C (1996) Plant Cell Environ 19: 65-74[CrossRef]
  • Lehmann J, Atzorn R, Bruckner C, Reinbothe S, Leopold J, Wasternack C, Parthier B (1995) Planta 197: 156-162
  • Lemtiri-Chlieh F (1996) J Membr Biol 153: 105-116[CrossRef][Medline]
  • Leon J, Rojo E, Titarenko E, Sanchez-Serrano JJ (1998) Mol Gen Genet 258: 412-419[Medline]
  • Leshem YY, Gottlieb HE, Bach D (1994) J. Plant Physiol 144: 691-695
  • MacRobbie EAC (1981) J Exp Bot 32: 563-572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Neher E (1992) Methods Enzymol 207: 123-131[ISI][Medline]
  • Outlaw WH (1983) Physiol Plant 59: 302-311[CrossRef]
  • Raghavendra AS, Bhaskar Reddy K (1987) Plant Physiol 83: 732-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Starling AP, Hughes G, East JM, Lee AG (1994) Biochemistry 33: 3023-3031[CrossRef][Medline]
  • Tsurumi S, Asahi Y (1985) Physiol Plant 64: 207-211
  • Wang SY (1999) J Plant Growth Regul 18: 127-134[Medline]
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
N. Saito, S. Munemasa, Y. Nakamura, Y. Shimoishi, I. C. Mori, and Y. Murata
Roles of RCN1, Regulatory A Subunit of Protein Phosphatase 2A, in Methyl Jasmonate Signaling and Signal Crosstalk between Methyl Jasmonate and Abscisic Acid
Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1396 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. E. Pluskota, N. Qu, M. Maitrejean, W. Boland, and I. T. Baldwin
Jasmonates and its mimics differentially elicit systemic defence responses in Nicotiana attenuata
J. Exp. Bot., December 7, 2007; (2007) erm263v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Munemasa, K. Oda, M. Watanabe-Sugimoto, Y. Nakamura, Y. Shimoishi, and Y. Murata
The coronatine-insensitive 1 Mutation Reveals the Hormonal Signaling Interaction between Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis Guard Cells. Specific Impairment of Ion Channel Activation and Second Messenger Production
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2007; 143(3): 1398 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Gfeller and E. E. Farmer
Keeping the Leaves Green Above Us
Science, November 26, 2004; 306(5701): 1515 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. Armengaud, R. Breitling, and A. Amtmann
The Potassium-Dependent Transcriptome of Arabidopsis Reveals a Prominent Role of Jasmonic Acid in Nutrient Signaling
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2004; 136(1): 2556 - 2576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Suhita, A. S. Raghavendra, J. M. Kwak, and A. Vavasseur
Cytoplasmic Alkalization Precedes Reactive Oxygen Species Production during Methyl Jasmonate- and Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2004; 134(4): 1536 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Riemann, A. Muller, A. Korte, M. Furuya, E. W. Weiler, and P. Nick
Impaired Induction of the Jasmonate Pathway in the Rice Mutant hebiba
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1820 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists