|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, March 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 935-940
UPDATE ON SYMBIOSIS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
LEGUMES, A UNIQUE FLOWERING PLANT FAMILY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With one notable exception, namely
the genus Parasponia in the elm family, the ability to form
nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with gram-negative soil bacteria known as
rhizobia is restricted to the legume family, Leguminosae. It has been
well established that initiation of successful nodular symbiosis
requires strict compatibility between rhizobial-secreted Nod factors
and a perception machinery of the plant host roots (Albrecht et
al., 1999
). Nod factors comprise a heterogeneous group of
morphogenic lipo-chitooligosaccharides with a major role as
determinants of host specificity (Spaink, 2000
).
Nanomolar concentrations of purified Nod factors can mimic bacterial
infections to a certain extent by inducing several root cellular
responses that are characteristic of compatible interaction between the
host plant and symbiotic bacteria. Early plant responses to Nod
factors, including activation of a subset of plant specific genes
called early nodulins (ENODs), calcium spiking,
root hair curling, pre-infection thread formation, and induction and
organogenesis of nodule primordia (NP), have been extensively studied
and constitute the subject of several recent reviews (for example,
Geurts and Bisseling, 2002
). Curiously, while the biology of
nitrogen-fixing root nodules has been broadly investigated, we still do
not understand what unique evolutionary event predisposed legume plants
and Parasponia to form nodular symbiosis with rhizobia. In
an attempt to address this question, we analyze here three specific
examples demonstrating that this symbiosis may have recruited existing
plant regulatory programs during its evolution.
The fact that there are homologs of ENOD genes in non-legumes suggests
that development of nodular symbiosis involved the harnessing of
genetic functions from existing developmental pathways. Albrecht et al.
(1999)
discussed genetic and corroborating molecular observations that support the notion that legume-Rhizobium
symbiosis may have evolved, in part, from a pre-existing
pathway(s) that regulates the more widespread (pertaining to more than
80% of extant plant species) and ancient phosphate-acquiring symbiosis of plant roots with fungi, termed arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM). In the
first section of this Update, we discuss recently
characterized genes that may represent "footprints" of such a
pathway(s). That a number of nodulin genes are also expressed in
non-symbiotic plant tissues suggests that genes involved in
non-symbiotic pathways may also have been recruited during the
evolution of nodular symbiosis. We highlight this point in the second
section of the Update by discussing similarities between
early rhizobial infections and events occurring during flower
pollination. The final section addresses early nodulation events on a
broader, organismal, level. Here, we consider a long-range signaling
mechanism, termed autoregulation of nodulation, and its relationship
with other regulatory pathways that coordinate plant growth and
development. While these three examples refer to a broad spectrum of
early developmental events during legume-Rhizobium
interactions, they emphasize that the evolution of nodular symbiosis
probably involved the recruitment of several different plant
developmental programs.
| |
FUNGAL FOOTPRINTS IN THE NODULATION PROGRAM |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the most exciting discoveries in the area of symbiotic
plant-microbe interactions has been the identification of common genetic determinants underlying AM and Rhizobium symbioses
(Duc et al., 1989
). To what extent this observation
reflects commonality of the mechanisms used by legumes to establish
both types of symbioses remains to be clarified. Nevertheless, the
initial molecular and genetic observations support a hypothesis that
the mechanism underlying the compatible response of legume roots to
rhizobial infections may have evolved in part from a pre-existing
pathway that regulates the more ancient AM symbiosis (Albrecht
et al., 1999
).
The orthologous genes LjSYMRK and NORK, recently
characterized from Lotus japonicus (Stracke et al.,
2002
) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) (Endre et
al., 2002
), respectively, may represent footprints of such
pathway(s). These genes were identified in genetic screens for plant
mutants resistant to both rhizobial (Nod
or
non-nodulation phenotype) and AM (Myc
or
non-mycorrhizal phenotype) infections and were subsequently cloned and
used to characterize the orthologous sym19 and
dmi2 loci from pea (Pisum sativum)
and barrel medic (Medicago
truncatula), respectively.
SYMRK/NORK are predicted to encode receptor
kinases that are highly similar with respect to their structure and
predicted function. The extracellular receptor ectodomains of
SYMRK/NORK contain three Leu-rich repeats (LRR) presumed to mediate
protein-protein interactions, but the nature of a protein
ligand(s) is presently unknown. An apparent strict requirement
for SYMRK/NORK function in AM symbiosis indicates their probable
widespread occurrence in the plant kingdom. In
agreement with this prediction, a survey of available protein
sequences and expressed sequenced tags (ESTs) revealed the presence of
proteins homologous to the ectodomain of NORK in a variety of
dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, and also in Gymnosperms
(Endre et al., 2002
). A recent analysis of EST records
for land plants suggests that sequences homologous to the plant
RLK/Pelle family of receptor kinases, to which SYMRK/NORK belong,
existed before diversification of land plant lineages (Shiu and
Bleecker, 2001
). In this context, and considering the ancient
origin of AM symbiosis, it is possible that SYMRK/NORK reflects an
extant form of an ancestral receptor(s). Such hypothetical receptor(s)
could have functioned in an ancient pathway that facilitated symbioses
of the earliest plants with fungi during their expansion to
a terrestrial environment (Pirozynski and Malloch,
1975
). With the knowledge of SYMRK/NORK sequences, a search for
such an ancestral receptor and its ligand can now be initiated.
Sequencing of the entire Arabidopsis genome has revealed 417 receptor-like kinase (RLK) sequences, with over half of them containing
LRR-type ectodomains. Plant RLKs have been implicated in diverse
developmental processes, including meristem development mediated by
CLV1, self-incompatibility via SRKs, perception of flagelline by FLS2,
and race-specific resistance by Xa21, to name a few (Becraft,
2002
and refs. therein). The SYMRK/NORK RLKs are predicted to
function in the Nod factor-dependent transduction pathway and in the
signaling processes that underlie AM symbiosis. SYMRK/NORK function is
required early on during symbiotic interaction for root hair curling,
and nork mutants were found to be incapable of performing
calcium spiking, one of the earliest root hair responses to Nod factors
and rhizobial infection. In wild-type plants, root hair curling sets
the stage for initiation of intracellular infection, which is blocked
in symrk/nork mutants. The Myc
phenotype of symrk/nork mutants also involves an
early block at or inside the root epidermis that prevents infection and
colonization of roots by AM fungi (Endre et al., 2002
;
Stracke et al., 2002
), and a common requirement for
calcium spiking in both mycorrhizal and nodulation signaling has been
postulated (Walker et al., 2000
).
In contrast to legume-Rhizobium symbiosis, signaling events
during AM symbiosis are poorly understood and the nature of a hypothetical AM factor(s) that could activate
SYMRK/NORK-dependent signaling is unknown. By analogy to Nod
factors, chitin-like molecules derived from the fungal cell wall
represent good candidates for such factors. However, whether SYMRK/NORK
receptor kinase represents a component of a perception apparatus or
works downstream from a symbiont-specific perception mechanism
remains an open question. Considering that pharmacological
studies implicate heterotrimeric G-proteins and phosphoinositide
(PI)-mediated signaling as downstream elements of the Nod factor
transduction pathway (Pingret et al., 1998
),
it will be interesting to see if SYMRK/NORK work as
G- protein-coupled receptors.
In addition to SYMRK/NORK, several other elements of the Nod factor
transduction pathway required for both symbioses have been identified.
In pea, for example, at least three genetically defined symbiotic loci,
Sym8, Sym9 and Sym30, have been implicated in early stages of both
symbioses, and this observation has now been extended to other legume
species, including two model legumes, L. japonicus and
M. truncatula (Marsh and Schultze, 2001
).
The observation that Nod factors can activate transcription of the M. truncatula early nodulin gene MtENOD12 in
transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) suggests that at least
part of the perception/transduction mechanism may operate in non-legume
plants, and that the genetically defined Nod
Myc
loci may underlie the elements of the
mechanism that are common for legume and non-legume plants
(Reddy et al., 1998
). This conclusion is further
supported by the ability of Rhizobium to nodulate a non-legume plant, Parasponia andersonii, in a process that
requires Nod factor-dependent signaling (Scott and Bender,
1990
).
Characterization of the remaining loci required for both symbioses will
undoubtedly unveil the signaling mechanisms involved and define to what
extent the species-specific nodular symbiosis has "learned" from
the evolutionarily much older AM symbiosis of plant and fungi. New
molecular data indicate the presence of common plant genetic elements
underlying parasitic nematodes and rhizobial endosymbioses
(Koltai et al., 2001
). Considering the postulated
involvement of Nod
Myc
loci in the regulation of plant defense responses
(Gianinazzi-Pearson, 1996
), it will be interesting to
see whether these loci also have specific roles during plant response
to parasitic endosymbionts. Parallel insight into symbiont-specific
plant functions may provide the long-awaited answer to the question
regarding the unique evolutionary event(s) that predisposed legume
plants and Parasponia to form nitrogen-fixing nodular
symbiosis with rhizobia. Transposon-tag-based cloning of the L. japonicus nin gene (Schauser et al., 1999
) and its
ortholog from pea (corresponding to sym35 allele;
Borisov et al., 2003
) offers the first defined molecular
example of such a symbiont (Rhizobium)-specific plant function.
| |
NODULES: MADS ABOUT FLOWERS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of nodulin genes are also expressed in non-symbiotic plant tissues. Have these genes been recruited from pre-existing pathways to operate in an analogous fashion in nodules? While this question remains largely unanswered, we may gain important insight into the evolution and symbiotic role of such genes by examining their involvement in non-symbiotic plant processes. For example, several nodulin genes have elevated expression levels in floral tissues or are homologous to floral-specific genes. Do these genes have similar roles in nodules and flowers? A growing body of evidence appears to indicate that plant plasma membrane-derived infection structures called infection threads (ITs), which contain the rhizobial symbiont, elongate toward nodule primordia (NP) using a mechanism resembling polar tip growth of pollen tubes elongating toward ovules.
Initiation of ITs requires strict compatibility between Nod factors and
host-specific root hair receptor(s) (Geurts and Bisseling, 2002
). As discussed in the previous section, RLKs with
extracellular LRRs have been implicated in successful Nod factor
signaling in root hairs (SYMRK/NORK). Analogously, pollen tubes are
initiated upon successful signaling between the stigma and mature
pollen grains, and pollen-expressed RLKs with extracellular LRRs have been implicated in compatible pollinations (Becraft,
2002
and refs. therein). Once initiated, polar tip
growth of ITs and pollen tubes is directionally guided toward NP and
ovules, respectively, and in the case of ITs, a specific alignment of
cytoplasmic strands (phragmosomes) in activated cortical cells has been
postulated to predetermine the orientation and position of IT
development (Brewin, 1991
).
Interestingly, a number of observations indicate that the tip
growth mechanism in pollen tubes and ITs may involve similar key
regulators. Small G-proteins have emerged as "master signaling switches" of polar tip growth in pollen (Yang, 2002
and refs. therein). Given that the small G-protein Rab2 is highly
expressed in mature pollen in tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum) and Arabidopsis, it is tempting to speculate that
elevated levels of Rab2 transcripts in L. japonicus nodules (Borg et al., 1997
) are
associated with polar tip growth of ITs, especially considering that
dominant negative mutations in the tobacco NtRab2 gene
inhibit pollen tube elongation (Cheung et al., 2002
).
Since a major component of G-protein-mediated polar tip growth of
pollen tubes is PI signaling, it is also intriguing that transcripts of
the L. japonicus gene LjPLPIV, which encodes a
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, were detected in flowers and
infected cells of nodules (Kapranov et al., 2001
).
Importantly, recent analysis of LjPLPIV promoter activity
has demonstrated that its floral expression is pollen specific.
MADS-box genes have also been implicated in the pollen tube tip growth
mechanism. These genes, known as "master regulators" of flower
development, are now emerging as important regulators of other plant
processes, including nodular symbiosis (Zucchero et al.,
2001
). Interestingly, the nodule-specific alfalfa gene nmhC5 belongs to the same MADS-box clade as the "late"
pollen-expressed genes DEFH125 and ZmMADS2 from
Antirrhinum majus and maize (Zea mays),
respectively. While the role(s) of nmhC5 has yet to be established, genes belonging to the same MADS-box clade are considered to be related functionally (Theissen et al., 2000
);
therefore, comparison with its non-symbiotic clade members should
provide clues to nmhC5 function(s) during nodule
development. The DEFH125 protein localizes to mature pollen and also to
transmitting tract cells in the style after pollination, indicating a
role in pollen tube elongation and guidance (Zachgo et al.,
1997
). A specific role for ZmMADS2 in pollen tube
elongation has been implicated by in situ RNA hybridization, which
demonstrated that ZmMADS2 transcripts are translocated into
pollen tubes in a tip-focused gradient (Heuer et al.,
2000
). Given the predicted participation of DEFH125
and ZmMADS2 in pollen tube tip growth and that
nmhC5 expression begins in the nodule invasion zone
(Heard et al., 1997
), it is tempting to speculate that
nmhC5 is involved in regulating tip growth of ITs.
Interestingly, the other identified symbiotically expressed alfalfa
MADS-box genes, nmh7 and ngl9, are only expressed in flowers and infected cells of nodules; however, their function remains unknown (Zucchero et al., 2001
). It is important
to point out that nodules have probably recruited several non-symbiotic plant mechanisms and that polar tip growth represents just one example
of a developmental process that may have been recruited during the
evolution of nodular symbiosis from a pre-existing plant pathway.
| |
SHOOTS "COUNT" ON NODULES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In response to rhizobia and Nod factor signaling the cell cycle in
the susceptible zone of the root pericycle and cortex of the host plant
is reactivated giving rise to cell division clusters termed NP. A
subset of NP cells is targeted by ITs, a process which leads to
colonization of plant cells by symbiotic bacteria and formation of the
nitrogen-fixing cells of the nodules. The host plant regulates the
number of successful infection events and differentiation of NP via a
locally operating mechanism(s) involving the plant hormone ethylene and
a systemically operating mechanism(s) that involves a mobile signal(s)
of an as yet unknown nature (Penmetsa et al., 2003
).
Differentiation of NP has been linked to a systemically operating
root-shoot regulatory mechanism known as autoregulation of nodulation
(AON). AON constitutes a long-distance signaling process where early
cellular events associated with formation of NP are communicated and
transformed in the shoot into a regulatory feedback response. This
shoot-derived response usually restricts proliferation of new nodule
tissues, thus maintaining homeostasis of the symbiotic interaction
(Gresshoff, 1993
and refs. therein). Although
poorly understood on the molecular level, the available data seem to
suggest that AON may have evolved from pre-existing growth-related
signaling mechanisms possibly integrating root development with events
in the plant shoot.
Plant mutants defective in AON form an excessive number of nodules
(Nod++ or hypernodulation), a phenotype often
associated with additional (pleiotropic) alterations in shoot and/or
root growth. In L. japonicus, for example, homozygous
mutations in the Har1 locus block AON, which results in
hypernodulation. har1 mutants also have abnormal root
development when grown in the absence of symbiotic bacteria (Wopereis et al., 2000
; Kawaguchi et al.,
2002
). Data from grafting experiments indicate that the
hypernodulation and altered root phenotypes of har1 mutants
are shoot-genotype dependent (Krusell et al., 2002
),
suggesting a common role for Har1 in long-distance shoot
regulation of root development and autoregulation of nodule organogenesis. The existence of overlapping regulatory functions for
nodulation (AON) and root development is also suggested by the inferior
root growth phenotypes observed for several independent hypernodulating
mutants of different legume species, including the nod3
mutant in pea. Unlike all other AON-defective mutants characterized
thus far, the hypernodulation and altered root characteristics of the
nod3 mutant are not under shoot genotype control, but are dictated by the root genotype of the mutant plant (Postma et
al., 1988
). Nevertheless, both har1 and
nod3 mutants share similar features of modified root
architecture such as diminished root length and increased lateral root
formation (Postma et al., 1988
; Wopereis et al.,
2000
).
An overlap between developmental processes associated with lateral root
formation and nodulation is supported by the recent work of Mathesius
et al. (2000)
, who show that mature cortical cells of
white clover that are activated during lateral root development, recapitulate some of the early responses associated with nodule formation and can be "hijacked" by rhizobia to form the so-called lateral root associated nodules. Interestingly, a homozygous mutation in the L. japonicus LjBzf gene (corresponding to Ljsym77
locus; Kawaguchi et al., 2002
), which encodes a homolog
of the Arabidopsis bZIP transcriptional factor Hy5, enhances nodulation
and exerts a pleiotropic effect on root, shoot, and hypocotyl growth.
Hy5 has a role in photomorphogenesis as well as in the
regulation of lateral root development in Arabidopsis
(Hardtke et al., 2000
), whereas LjBzf
regulates nodule organogenesis in L. japonicus
(Nishimura et al., 2002a
). Mathesius et al.
(2000)
hypothesize that the morphogenic process of
nodule formation evolved from a developmental pathway activated during
lateral root organogenesis. This hypothesis can be extended by
suggesting that AON evolved from regulatory mechanisms that control
root growth and differentiation of lateral root primordia.
Regulation of proliferation and growth of lateral roots constitutes an
important part of the mechanism used by plants to accommodate changes
in the surrounding soil environment. Local and long-range shoot-root
regulatory pathways were shown to be involved in this regulation, and
auxin and NO3
represent two
major internal and external factors, respectively, with important
signaling roles in root branching (Forde, 2002
). NO3
also represents a major
environmental factor that regulates nodulation. It is thus significant
that almost all hypernodulating mutants described thus far, including
L. japonicus har1 and pea nod3, have nodulation
phenotypes that are at least partially insensitive to normally
inhibitory concentrations of nitrate fertilizer (Nts or
nitrate-tolerant nodulation phenotype). The reverse is also true, i.e.
plant mutants selected for their Nts phenotype (e.g. nts mutants of
soybean [Glycine max], Carroll et al.,
1985
) were found to be defective in AON. The existence of an
overlap between auxin and NO3
signaling pathways in the mechanism that regulates lateral root growth
has been suggested (Forde, 2002
), and early events of
both lateral root formation and nodulation have recently been shown to
have common requirements for the plant hormone auxin (de Billy et al., 2001
). Clearly, the AON and
NO3
signaling pathways must
also intersect while mediating the regulation of nodule proliferation.
This intersection is predicted to involve both root and shoot localized
functions, and recent cloning experiments provide, for the first time,
an insight into the molecular nature of the shoot components involved.
L. japonicus Har1 (Krusell et al.,
2002
; Nishimura et al., 2002b
) and
GmNARK from soybean (corresponding to soybean Nts locus and
identical to GmCLV1B cDNA; Searle et al.,
2002
; Nishimura et al., 2002b
) were map-based
cloned and characterized. The Har1 gene sequence was
subsequently used to identify its presumed ortholog, PsSym29, from pea (Krusell et al., 2002
). All
three genes encode highly similar LRR-type RLKs, and we refer to them
hereafter as nodule autoregulation receptor kinases (NARKs), following
nomenclature proposed for the soybean NTS locus (GmNARK,
Searle et al., 2002
). Of the receptor kinases in
Arabidopsis, NARKs are most similar to the CLAVATA 1 protein
(CLV1; Clark et al., 1997
). However, while CLV1 Ser/Thr
receptor kinase restricts proliferation of stem cells through a
short-distance feedback loop in Arabidopsis shoot apices, NARKs mediate
a long-range shoot-to-root AON mechanism. The recessive clv1
mutants are characterized by an enlarged stem cell population resulting
in fasciation of the shoot. Interestingly, this phenotype was not
reported for har1, sym29, and nts
mutants but was described in association with the hypernodulating
phenotype of pea mutant sym28 (Sagan and Duc,
1996
). Thus, the Sym28 locus may represent a function common to
AON and the mechanism(s) that specifies differentiation and/or
proliferation of shoot apical meristems.
The function of NARKs in AON and other signaling pathways can now be
addressed. The major challenge will be to determine how NARKs receive
and convert the spectrum of external and internal cues from the roots
into a shoot-derived response that controls early stages of nodule
development. The other issue will be to understand the extent of cross
talk between different growth-related signaling events and AON and how
they converge to establish harmonious plant development, including
symbiotic development. Interestingly, NARKs may also regulate
plant-fungi interactions since roots of L. japonicus and pea
plants carrying homozygous mutations in Har1 and Sym29 loci,
respectively, are colonized more intensively by AM fungi
(Myc++ or hyper-mycorrhization phenotype) than
their wild-type counterparts (Morandi et al., 2000
;
Solaiman et al., 2000
). Thus, NARKs may be another link
between the two symbiotic interactions.
| |
CONCLUDING REMARKS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While discussing the origin of land plants, Pirozynski and Malloch
(1975)
concluded, "land plants never had an
independence (from fungi); for if they had, they could never have
colonized the land". The fossil records support this hypothesis
(Redecker et al., 2000
), suggesting that plants have
resolved the intricacies of the mechanism(s) for selective recognition
of beneficial versus harmful microorganisms long before nodular
symbiosis evolved. Taking advantage of at least some of the elements of
this pre-existing mechanism(s) was likely one of the events leading to
establishment of legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. It appears
though that nodules "have recruited" a number of other key plant
regulatory programs and/or elements of these programs for their own
development. As more pieces are added to the nodulation puzzle, a
common picture with non-symbiotic aspects of plant development emerges.
Thus, the ability to form nodular symbiosis (nodulation) may be not that different from non-nodulation after all; yet there must be something "special" to allow for nodular symbiosis of legumes with
nitrogen-fixing rhizobia to occur (see Hirsch et al.,
2001
). Uncovering this special feature(s) of legumes remains an
exciting and challenging task, and new genomic tools, especially those being developed in association with model legumes, should greatly facilitate this effort (Stacey and VandenBosch, 2003
).
Recently initiated genomic projects aimed at obtaining the
sequences of the entire genome of two model legumes,
L. japonicus and M. truncatula, will provide the
foundation for performing genome-wide comparative analyses. Information
regarding the progress of the model legume genome sequencing projects
can be found at the following URL locations: http://www.kazusa.or.jp/lotus and
http://www.genome.ou.edu/medicago_table.html. The prospect of
being able to make genome-wide comparisons between legumes and
non-legumes, such as Arabidopsis, is especially attractive since the
latter is unable to form symbiotic associations with mycorrhizal fungi
or with rhizobia.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We apologize to those whose work could not be cited because of the space limitations. We thank Drs. Peter M. Gresshoff and Mark Gijzen for their helpful comments and Dorothy Drew and Melissa Rapp for their help with the bibliography. We are grateful to those who kindly responded to our questions and/or shared information prior to publication.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received November 5, 2002; returned for revision December 5, 2002; accepted December 13, 2002.
1 This work is supported by the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Crop Genomics Initiative and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant no. 3277A01 to K.S.).
* Corresponding author; e-mail szczyglowskik{at}agr.gc.ca; fax 519-457-3997.
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.017186.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) obtained in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.).
Plant Sci
60: 215-222[CrossRef]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Maekawa-Yoshikawa, J. Muller, N. Takeda, T. Maekawa, S. Sato, S. Tabata, J. Perry, T. L. Wang, M. Groth, A. Brachmann, et al. The Temperature-Sensitive brush Mutant of the Legume Lotus japonicus Reveals a Link between Root Development and Nodule Infection by Rhizobia Plant Physiology, April 1, 2009; 149(4): 1785 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Crespi and F. Frugier De Novo Organ Formation from Differentiated Cells: Root Nodule Organogenesis Sci. Signal., December 9, 2008; 1(49): re11 - re11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Sprent 60Ma of legume nodulation. What's new? What's changing? J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(5): 1081 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Capoen, J. Den Herder, S. Rombauts, J. De Gussem, A. De Keyser, M. Holsters, and S. Goormachtig Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Common and Specific Tags for Root Hair and Crack-Entry Invasion in Sesbania rostrata Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1878 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Udvardi, K. Kakar, M. Wandrey, O. Montanari, J. Murray, A. Andriankaja, J.-Y. Zhang, V. Benedito, J. M.I. Hofer, F. Chueng, et al. Legume Transcription Factors: Global Regulators of Plant Development and Response to the Environment Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 538 - 549. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Pislariu and R. Dickstein An IRE-Like AGC Kinase Gene, MtIRE, Has Unique Expression in the Invasion Zone of Developing Root Nodules in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 682 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Khan, Q. Wang, R. D. Sjolund, A. Schulz, and G. A. Thompson An Early Nodulin-Like Protein Accumulates in the Sieve Element Plasma Membrane of Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1576 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu, S. S. Miller, M. Graham, B. Bucciarelli, C. M. Catalano, D. J. Sherrier, D. A. Samac, S. Ivashuta, M. Fedorova, P. Matsumoto, et al. Recruitment of Novel Calcium-Binding Proteins for Root Nodule Symbiosis in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, May 1, 2006; 141(1): 167 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhu, B. K. Riely, N. J. Burns, and J.-M. Ane Tracing Nonlegume Orthologs of Legume Genes Required for Nodulation and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbioses Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2491 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lievens, S. Goormachtig, J. Den Herder, W. Capoen, R. Mathis, P. Hedden, and M. Holsters Gibberellins Are Involved in Nodulation of Sesbania rostrata Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1366 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takeda, S. Okamoto, M. Hayashi, and Y. Murooka Expression of LjENOD40 Genes in Response to Symbiotic and Non-symbiotic Signals: LjENOD40-1 and LjENOD40-2 are Differentially Regulated in Lotus japonicus Plant Cell Physiol., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1291 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhu, H.-K. Choi, D. R. Cook, and R. C. Shoemaker Bridging Model and Crop Legumes through Comparative Genomics Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1189 - 1196. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Karas, J. Murray, M. Gorzelak, A. Smith, S. Sato, S. Tabata, and K. Szczyglowski Invasion of Lotus japonicus root hairless 1 by Mesorhizobium loti Involves the Nodulation Factor-Dependent Induction of Root Hairs Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1331 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ooki, M. Banba, K. Yano, J. Maruya, S. Sato, S. Tabata, K. Saeki, M. Hayashi, M. Kawaguchi, K. Izui, et al. Characterization of the Lotus japonicus Symbiotic Mutant lot1 That Shows a Reduced Nodule Number and Distorted Trichomes Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1261 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Graham, K. A.T. Silverstein, S. B. Cannon, and K. A. VandenBosch Computational Identification and Characterization of Novel Genes from Legumes Plant Physiology, July 1, 2004; 135(3): 1179 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Calonje, P. Cubas, J. M. Martinez-Zapater, and M. J. Carmona Floral Meristem Identity Genes Are Expressed during Tendril Development in Grapevine Plant Physiology, July 1, 2004; 135(3): 1491 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Tansengco, H. Imaizumi-Anraku, M. Yoshikawa, S. Takagi, M. Kawaguchi, M. Hayashi, and Y. Murooka Pollen Development and Tube Growth are Affected in the Symbiotic Mutant of Lotus japonicus, crinkle Plant Cell Physiol., May 15, 2004; 45(5): 511 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Beveridge, J. L. Weller, S. R. Singer, and J. M.I. Hofer Axillary Meristem Development. Budding Relationships between Networks Controlling Flowering, Branching, and Photoperiod Responsiveness Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 927 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Penmetsa, J. A. Frugoli, L. S. Smith, S. R. Long, and D. R. Cook Dual Genetic Pathways Controlling Nodule Number in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 998 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|