Plant Physiology 132:1870-1883 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists
PLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS
MPB2C, a Microtubule-Associated Plant Protein Binds to and Interferes with Cell-to-Cell Transport of Tobacco Mosaic Virus Movement Protein1
Friedrich Kragler2,3,
Mirela Curin3,
Kateryna Trutnyeva,
Andreas Gansch and
Elisabeth Waigmann*
Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University Departments at the Vienna
Biocenter, Institute of Medical Biochemistry, University of Vienna, Dr.
Bohr-Gasse. 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus, MP30, mediates viral
cell-to-cell transport via plasmodesmata. The complex MP30 intra- and
intercellular distribution pattern includes localization to the endoplasmic
reticulum, cytoplasmic bodies, microtubules, and plasmodesmata and likely
requires interaction with plant endogenous factors. We have identified and
analyzed an MP30-interacting protein, MPB2C, from the host plant Nicotiana
tabacum. MPB2C constitutes a previously uncharacterized
microtubule-associated protein that binds to and colocalizes with MP30 at
microtubules. In vivo studies indicate that MPB2C mediates accumulation of
MP30 at microtubules and interferes with MP30 cell-to-cell movement. In
contrast, intercellular transport of a functionally enhanced MP30 mutant,
which does not accumulate and colocalize with MP30 at microtubules, is not
impaired by MPB2C. Together, these data support the concept that MPB2C is not
required for MP30 cell-to-cell movement but may act as a negative effector of
MP30 cell-to-cell transport activity.
Plant viruses produce movement proteins required to mediate cell-to-cell
spread of the viral genomic information via plasmodesmata
(Lucas, 1995 ;
Lazarowitz and Beachy, 1999 ;
McLean and Zambryski, 2000 ;
Tzfira et al., 2000 ;
Haywood et al., 2002 ;
Heinlein, 2002 ). Tobacco
mosaic virus (TMV), a virus with a (+) single-stranded RNA genome encodes one
of the most extensively studied movement proteins, MP30. Several biochemical
and cell biological features of MP30 were revealed: MP30 binds cooperatively
single-stranded nucleic acids (Citovsky et
al., 1990 ), interacts with the tubulin- and actin-based
cytoskeleton (Heinlein et al.,
1995 ; McLean et al.,
1995 ), associates to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER;
Heinlein et al., 1998 ;
Reichel and Beachy, 1998 ;
Mas and Beachy, 1999 ;
Gillespie et al., 2002 ), and
increases the size exclusion limit of plasmodesmata
(Wolf et al., 1989 ;
Waigmann et al., 1994 ). In the
current model, MP30 is proposed to form complexes with genomic TMV-RNA (vRNA)
and to move these vRNA-protein complexes from ER-associated sites of synthesis
throughout the cell via the cytoskeletal network toward plasmodesmata. There,
MP30 induces an increase in plasmodesmal size exclusion limit and facilitates
the transport of the vRNA-MP30 complex through the enlarged plasmodesmal
channels into adjacent cells (Lazarowitz
and Beachy, 1999 ; Tzfira et
al., 2000 ; Haywood et al.,
2002 ; Heinlein,
2002 ). In line with this model, microtubules have been
functionally implicated in guiding vRNA-MP30 complexes toward plasmodesmata
(Mas and Beachy, 2000 ; Boyko
et al., 2000a ,
2000b ). However, an alternate,
non-movement-promoting role of microtubules in providing a route toward an
MP30 degradation site was suggested
(Padgett et al., 1996 ;
Mas and Beachy, 1999 ;
Reichel and Beachy, 2000 ).
This model is supported by the observation that TMV was able to spread in
tissues with functionally impaired microtubules and by studies performed with
a mutant variant of MP30, MPR3
(Toth et al., 2002 ) with
strongly decreased affinity to microtubules but increased cell-to-cell
movement capacity (Gillespie et al.,
2002 ).
The complex intra- and intercellular transport processes likely require
interaction of MP30 with cellular factors that assist in subcellular
distribution and cell-to-cell movement. So far, a cell wall-associated pectin
methyl esterase (PME; Dorokhov et al.,
1999 ; Chen et al.,
2000 ; Tzfira et al.,
2000 ) was shown to specifically interact with TMV-MP30. Also,
binding studies of MP30 with cell fractions enriched in plasmodesmal
components indicate the presence of potential receptor molecules mediating
protein movement via plasmodesmata
(Kragler et al., 1998 ).
Recently, NtNCAPP1, an ER-localized protein, was found to be involved in the
plasmodesmal transport pathway of MP30
(Lee et al., 2003 ).
Furthermore, a cell wall-associated kinase is known to phosphorylate the MP30
(Citovsky et al., 1993 )
thereby modulating its cell-to-cell movement activity
(Waigmann et al., 2000 ).
For a number of movement proteins from other viruses, interacting cellular
factors such as a rab receptor-like protein, Hsp40 (DnaK) family members, a
homeodomain protein, and a transcriptional coactivator were recently
identified (Soellick et al.,
2000 ; Huang et al.,
2001 ; Lin and Heaton,
2001 ; Desvoyes et al.,
2002 ; Matsushita et al.,
2002 ). The functions of these interesting movement protein
interaction partners with respect to cell-to-cell movement have yet to be
elucidated.
Here, we report the identification of a previously uncharacterized
MP30-interacting plant protein, MPB2C, from the TMV host plant Nicotiana
tabacum. MPB2C associates with microtubules in a punctuate manner and
colocalizes with MP30. In functional studies, MPB2C mediates MP30 subcellular
redistribution to microtubule-associated sites and selectively inhibits MP30
cell-to-cell movement. A potential role of MPB2C as a negative effector of
MP30 transport activity is discussed.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Identification of MP30-Interacting Factor MPB2C via the Yeast Sos
Recruitment System (SRS)
The partially hydrophobic nature of MP30
(Citovsky et al., 1990 ;
Brill et al., 2000 ) and its
association to cell compartments such as the ER membrane, cytoskeleton, and
plasmodesmal receptors (for review, see
Haywood et al., 2002 ;
Heinlein, 2002 ) indicate that
a membrane-based interaction screening system may be more suitable to identify
MP30-interacting proteins than the conventional two-hybrid system. The yeast
SRS (Aronheim et al., 1997 )
allows detection of interaction of proteins at the plasma membrane in Brewer's
yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae;
Aronheim et al., 1997 ;
Yamanaka et al., 2000 ).
Because the membranous environment provided by the SRS might be more
compatible with the observed cellular distribution of MP30, this yeast-based
interaction screening system was chosen to identify plant-produced
MP30-binding proteins.
In the SRS, the bait protein is fused to the human Ras guanyl nucleotide
exchange factor (hSos), which complements the temperature-sensitive (ts)
cdc25-2 yeast growth phenotype upon recruitment to the plasma membrane. Prey
library proteins are N-terminally linked to a myristoylation signal providing
plasma membrane localization. Bait-prey interaction results in recruitment of
hSos to the plasma membrane and leads to growth of yeast colonies at the
restrictive temperature (Aronheim et al.,
1997 ). Library protein production is regulated by a Gal-dependent
promoter, which allows controlled expression of library protein and
verification of specific interactions by observing Gal-dependent growth of the
yeast colonies.
First, a bait MP30-Sos fusion protein expressed by the yeast shuttle vector
ADNS-MP (Fig. 1A, top scheme)
was constructed. To ensure that MP30-Sos by itself was not able to complement,
or to interfere with complementation of, the cdc25-2 ts phenotype, cells were
cotransformed with ADNS-MP30 and empty library vector YESMpolyA. No yeast
colonies were formed at the restrictive temperature
(Fig. 1B, top panels). Thus,
MP30 did not mediate hSos localization to the plasma membrane in yeast.
Selective Gal-dependent growth was observed when cells were cotransformed with
positive control vector YESM7 encoding an hSos-interacting protein and
MP30-Sos-expressing bait plasmid (Fig.
1B, panels in second row). This functional test indicates that the
MP30-hSos fusion protein is stable, can be translocated to the plasma
membrane, and is able to activate the Ras pathway. Thus, MP30 fused to hSos
was suitable to be used as bait in a SRS screen.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. SRS screening for MP30 interaction partners. A, Schematic representation of
bait and library constructs. B, Complementation of the cdc25 ts phenotype.
Bait and prey proteins expressed in transformed cells are indicated to left
and right of panels, respectively. Growth of yeast is compared on Gal- and
Glc-containing media at the restrictive temperature. Prey proteins are
expressed only on Gal-containing medium.
|
|
Next, directional cDNA derived from poly(A+)-RNA obtained from
leaf, stem, shoot apex, and flower tissue of the natural TMV host plant N.
tabacum cv Turkish was used to construct a myristoylation signal-tagged
expression library (Fig. 1A,
bottom scheme). To isolate cDNAs, which encode interaction partners of MP30,
approximately 106 independent cDNA clones were screened. A novel
cDNA named movement protein binding 2C, library (MPB2Clib) coding
for a 124-amino acid protein (Fig.
3A) was selected for further analysis.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Expression and sequence analysis of MPB2C. A, Deduced amino acid sequence
of full-length MPB2C. N-terminal hydrophobic region (+), the coiled-coil
domain (boxed), MPB2Clib sequence (underlined), and the start for
N-terminally truncated constructs (arrows) are indicated. B, Northern analysis
of MPB2C expression. Tobacco poly(A+)-RNA was probed with an
MPB2C-specific probe (lane 1) or a ubiquitin-specific probe as control (lane
2). C, Western-blot analysis of MPB2C expression. Total protein extracted from
leaf tissue was incubated with anti-MPB2C-antibody (lane 1) or preimmune
antibody (lane 2). D, Phylogenetic tree obtained by MPB2C protein sequence
comparison with translated cDNA sequences. The related sequences fall into a
dicotyledonous and a monocotyledonous clade, which reflects the evolutionary
relation of the plant families. Note that no significantly homologous sequence
was observed in available non-flowering plants, fungi, animals, bacteria, and
virus sequence databanks. GenBank accession numbers of the cDNA sequences were
At5g08120 (Arabidopsis), AI898765 (tomato [Lycopersicon esculentum]),
BE347146 (soybean [Glycine max]), BE186113 (maize [Zea
mays]), BE356348 (sorghum [Sorghum bicolor]), AU094801
(Oryza sativum), and AL509409 (barley [Hordeum vulgare]).
Space bar represents 0.1 substitutions per amino acid.
|
|
Specific interaction between MPB2Clib and MP30-Sos was apparent
by Gal-dependent growth of cells co-expressing MPB2Clib and
MP30-Sos at the restrictive temperature
(Fig. 1B, panels in third row).
In contrast, upon co-expression of MPB2Clib with a nonrelevant bait
protein, p110-Sos, no growth of yeast colonies was observed
(Fig. 1B, bottom panels). These
complementation tests confirmed the specificity of interaction between MP30
and MPB2Clib. Interestingly, MPB2Clib interacted with
1-58MP30-Sos (Fig. 1B,
panels in fourth row), a truncated form of MP30 lacking the N-terminal 58
amino acids but retaining the region required for interaction with and
movement through plasmodesmata (Waigmann
et al., 1994 ). The cDNA sequence of MPB2Clib was
determined, and comparison of the predicted protein against DNA and protein
databases using the TBLAST algorithm
(Pearson and Lipman, 1988 )
revealed that MPB2C is an uncharacterized plant protein with structural
properties similar to the myosin/kinesin super family (data not shown). Thus,
we have isolated the cDNA of a previously uncharacterized tobacco protein,
MPB2C, which specifically binds in vivo to MP30 in the SRS interaction
assay.
MPB2C and MP30 Interact in Vitro
Specificity of the yeast-based interaction studies was confirmed in vitro
by overlay assays. First, an Anti-Xpress-tag-MPB2Clib fusion
protein of approximately 20 kD, and, as a negative control, tag protein alone
with approximately 8 kD were produced in Escherichia coli and
detected by western blotting using Anti-Xpress-tag antibody
(Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2). For
overlay assays (Fig. 2B), purified MP30 was blotted onto nitrocellulose, and MP30 presence and size were
verified with an antibody directed against MP30
(Fig. 2A, lane 3). In parallel,
part of the blot was renatured and incubated with either total E.
coli lysate containing tag-MPB2Clib or tag protein alone.
Addition of tagged MPB2Clib resulted in strong binding, which could
be competed by the addition of an excess of MP30 to the overlay mixture
(Fig. 2B). In contrast, no
signal was detected in the control reaction with tag protein alone
(Fig. 2B). To determine whether
MPB2C is capable of interacting with a viral movement protein functionally
related to MP30, an immobilized cucumber mosaic virus movement protein (CMV3a;
Li and Palukaitis, 1996 ) was
used in a parallel overlay experiment. Here, no interaction of
MPB2Clib with CMV3a was observed
(Fig. 2B). Together, these
results underscore that MP30 and MPB2Clib specifically interact in
vitro.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. MPB2C binds to MP30 in in vitro overlay assays. A, Verification of protein
expression in E. coli: Tag-MPB2Clib (lane 1), tag
protein alone (lane 2), and MP30 (lane 3) were detected by western blotting
and labeling with Anti-Xpress-tag antibody (lanes 1 and 2) or anti-MP30
antibody (lane 3). B, Detection of interaction between MPB2Clib and
viral MPs by renatured blot overlay assay. Blotted MP30 and CMV3a were
incubated with E. coli lysate containing
tag-MPB2Clib, tag protein alone, and soluble MP30 as indicated in
scheme. Binding was detected with Anti-Xpress-tag antibody.
|
|
Sequence and Expression Analysis of MPB2C
By RACE techniques, full-length MPB2C cDNA with a size of 1.2 kb was
isolated. Upon northern-blot analysis of poly(A+)-RNA from green
tissue of N. tabacum with an MPB2C-specific probe
(Fig. 3B, lane 1), a band
correlating to the calculated size of MPB2C cDNA was observed. As a positive
control for RNA quality, a ubiquitin-specific probe was used
(Fig. 3B, lane 2). Together,
RACE and northern results indicate that the full-length MPB2C cDNA was
isolated.
Full-length MPB2C cDNA translates into a 321-amino acid protein
(Fig. 3A) with a calculated
molecular mass of 36 kD. MPB2C protein expression was confirmed by western
blotting with an anti-MPB2C antibody raised against purified E.
coli-generated MPB2C. When total protein extract derived from leaf tissue
was analyzed with the anti-MPB2C antibody, a single MPB2C-specific band with a
molecular mass of approximately 40 kD was detected
(Fig. 3C, lane 1) that was not
present upon incubation of the blot with preimmune serum
(Fig. 3C, lane 2), indicating
that the MPB2C protein is constitutively expressed in leaf tissue. Note that
the aberrantly high molecular mass of the MPB2C protein in denaturing
polyacrylamide gels was also observed for the recombinant E. coli
MPB2C protein (data not shown).
Structural analysis of full-length MPB2C protein revealed a large
coiled-coil region typical for cytoskeletal-associated factors
(Lupas et al., 1991 )
stretching from amino acids 125 to 240
(Fig. 3A). In addition, a short
hydrophobic region encompassing amino acids 44 to 52 was predicted
(Kyte and Doolittle, 1982 ).
When the predicted MPB2C protein sequence was compared with the Arabidopsis
database The Arabidopsis Information Resource by FASTA algorithm
(Pearson and Lipman, 1988 ),
one homologous protein of similar size of 326 amino acids (approximately 40%
identity; gi:8346549), was identified. The carboxy-terminal part of the
Arabidopsis MPB2C homolog was previously isolated in a screen for plant
cytoskeletal, cell cycle-related, and polarity-related proteins
(Xia et al., 1996 ). TBLASTN
searches
(http://arabidopsis.org/Blast/)
in nonredundant plant databases and subsequent analysis with the ClustalW
software
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/;
Thompson et al., 1994 )
highlighted a number of uncharacterized cDNAs encoding significantly similar
proteins from mono-and dicotyledonous plants with identity ranging from 75% to
37%. The evolutionary relations between MPB2C from N. tabacum and its
various homologs from other plant species were compiled
(Page, 1996 ) and depicted as a
tree (Fig. 3D). The related
proteins fall into a dicotyledonous and a monocotyledonous clade, which
reflects the evolutionary relation of the plant families. Interestingly,
proteins with significant structural homology to MPB2C seem to be limited to
the plant kingdom because no related proteins with overall similarity above
25% were found in databases of non-plant organisms such as viruses, bacteria,
yeasts, and animals.
MPB2C Localizes to Microtubules in a Punctuate Manner
To evaluate intracellular localization, full-length and N-terminally
truncated variants of MPB2C lacking either the hydrophobic region
( 1-66MPB2C), or in addition to the hydrophobic region, a large part of
the coiled-coil domain ( 1-214MPB2C), were fused to red fluorescent
protein (RFP; Matz et al.,
1999 ) or green fluorescent protein (GFP;
Chalfie et al., 1994 ;
Table I), respectively. Fusion
proteins were transiently expressed in epidermal cells of N. tabacum
source leaves and were analyzed for subcellular localization patterns by
confocal laser scanning microscopy. The full-length MPB2C-RFP appears as small
punctae and larger bodies (Fig. 4, A and
D, arrows point to bodies, arrowheads to punctae;
Table I). Variable relative
amounts of MPB2C-RFP bodies and punctae can be observed in individual cells
ranging from primarily body-like phenotypes
(Fig. 4A) over mixed phenotypes
(Figs. 4D and
6A) to predominantly punctuate
phenotypes (Figs. 4G and
6D). The truncated
1-66MPB2C-RFP lacking the hydrophobic N-terminal domain localizes to
filamentous structures as well as to larger bodies and small punctae
(Fig. 4B; Table I). Frequently, the
bodies and punctae decorated by the MPB2C-RFP fusion protein are in close
contact and appear to align along filamentous structures (Figs.
4, B and G, and
6D). Similar localization
patterns were observed for MPB2C-GFP and 1-66MPB2C-GFP (data not
shown). 1-214MPB2C-GFP lacks most of the coiled-coil structure in
addition to the hydrophobic domain and shows cytoplasmic distribution
equivalent to that observed for free soluble GFP in epidermal cells
(Fig. 4C;
Table I).

View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Analysis of intracellular expression patterns of MPB2C. RFP and GFP fusion
proteins were transiently expressed in epidermal cells of N.
tabacum leaves by biolistic transformation and were analyzed by
confocal microscopy after 48 h in the appropriate channels. Red color
indicates RFP fluorescence; green color indicates GFP fluorescence. A,
MPB2C-RFP; for better orientation, the cellular outline has been redrawn. B,
1-66MPB2C-RFP. C, 1-214MPB2C-GFP. D to I, Co-expression of
MPB2C-RFP (D and G) with MAP4-GFP (E and H); F and I, merged image. J to L,
Co-expression of 1-66MPB2C-RFP (J) with MAP4-GFP (K); L, merged image.
Arrows point to bodies, arrowheads to punctae. Bars in A, G, and J = 20 µm;
bars in B through D = 10 µm.
|
|

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. MPB2C proteins colocalize with MP30-GFP. Analysis of expression and
presentation of micrographs as described in
Figure 4. A to F, Co-expression
of MPB2C-RFP (A and D) with MP30-GFP (B and E); C and F, merged image. G to I,
Co-expression of 1-66MPB2C-RFP (G) and MP30-GFP (H); I, merged image.
Arrowheads point to small punctae decorated by MPB2C-RFP and MP30-GFP. Bars in
A, D, and G = 20 µm.
|
|
The filamentous appearance of the 1-66MPB2C-RFP suggests association
to microtubules. Therefore, colocalization experiments between MPB2C-RFP
fusion proteins and microtubule-associated protein MAP4-GFP
(Marc et al., 1998 ) were
performed. The large bodies decorated by MPB2C-RFP
(Fig. 4D, arrows) were also
decorated by MAP4-GFP (Fig. 4E,
arrows) and were in close contact with MAP4-GFP-decorated microtubules
(Fig. 4F, arrows). Also,
MPB2C-RFP appearing as small punctae (Fig.
4, D [arrowheads] and G) aligned at MAP4-GFP-decorated
microtubules (Fig. 4, E and H)
in the merged image (Fig. 4, F [arrowheads]
and I). Similarly, the truncated 1-66MPB2C-RFP fusion
protein predominantly decorated punctae and filaments that colocalized to
filaments decorated by MAP4-GFP (Fig. 4,
JL).
Furthermore, to determine the subcellular localization of endogenous MPB2C,
protoplasts derived from leaf tissue were analyzed by immunofluorescence.
Fixed protoplasts were incubated with anti-tubulin antibody and anti-MPB2C
antibody (Fig. 5, A and B) or,
as a negative control, with anti-tubulin antibody and preimmune serum
(Fig. 5C). Intracellular
localization patterns were evaluated by confocal microscopy. The
MPB2C-specific signal was detected in the green channel and manifested as
punctae that generally aligned to or were in close contact with microtubular
filaments detected in the red channel (Fig.
5, A and B, arrows). In contrast, in protoplasts incubated with
preimmune serum, microtubule-associated punctae were not detected
(Fig. 5C). For comparison, a
high-resolution image of transiently co-expressed MPB2C-RFP and MAP4-GFP is
provided. Note that MPB2C-RFP punctae (Fig.
5D, arrows) align to MAP4-GFP-decorated microtubules highly
similar to endogenous MPB2C.

View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Endogenous MPB2C localizes in punctae to microtubules. Leaf tissue-derived
protoplasts were analyzed by immunofluorescence and were observed with a
confocal microscope. A and B, Protoplasts incubated with anti-tubulin-antibody
(red) and anti-MPB2C-antibody (green). Arrows point to MPB2C punctae. C,
Protoplasts incubated with anti-tubulin-antibody (red) and preimmune serum
(green). D, High-resolution image of MPB2C-RFP co-expressed with MAP4-GFP in
an epidermal leaf cell. Compare the punctuate MPB2C-RFP pattern (arrows) with
that of endogenous MPB2C. Bar for A to D in A = 5 µm.
|
|
Collectively, these studies indicate that endogenous MPB2C localizes in
discrete punctae to microtubular filaments and that this punctuate
localization pattern is correctly reflected by transiently expressed
MPB2C-RFP. However, in transient expression experiments, we additionally
observe large MPB2C-RFP-decorated bodies that do not correctly reflect the
localization of endogenous MPB2C and are likely a consequence of the high
expression level achieved in the transient assay.
MPB2C Colocalizes to MP30 in Plant Cells
As a necessary prerequisite for interaction between MPB2C and MP30 in plant
cells in vivo, both proteins should be present in the same subcellular
compartment(s). In line, the filament and body-like appearance of MPB2C
resembles described intracellular localization patterns of MP30 (Heinlein et
al., 1995 ,
1998 ;
McLean et al., 1995 ;
Kahn et al., 1998 ;
Mas and Beachy, 1999 ;
Crawford and Zambryski, 2000 ;
Boyko et al., 2000a ,
2000b ;
Kotlizky et al., 2001 ).
Upon transient expression in epidermal cells of N. tabacum source
leaves, MPB2C-RFP-decorated bodies and punctae
(Fig. 6, A and D) colocalize to
MP30-GFP (Fig. 6, B and E) in
the merged image (Fig. 6, C and
F; arrowheads in A, B, and C point to some of the colocalizing
punctae). In addition, an MP30-GFP signal is also observed in small regular
cortical punctae (Fig. 6B) reflecting ER-associated MP30-GFP
(Gillespie et al., 2002 ), but
these punctae are not tagged by MPB2C-RFP proteins
(Fig. 6C). Upon coexpression
with 1-66MPB2C-RFP, MP30-GFP is predominantly detected at filaments
that overlap with those decorated by 1-66MPB2C-RFP
(Fig. 6, GI). In
summary, colocalization between MP30 and MPB2C is observed at the level of
microtubules but not when MP30 is associated to the ER. This observation
indicates that in vivo interaction between MP30 and MPB2C takes place at
microtubules, in line with the endogenous localization of MPB2C.
Interestingly, in the presence of transiently expressed MPB2C-RFP fusion
proteins, MP30-GFP was nearly exclusively localized to microtubule-associated
sites and to the ER (Fig. 6, B, E, and
H) and was localized in only 4% of co-expressing cells to the
characteristic cell wall-associated punctae, reflecting plasmodesmal
association of MP30 (compare Fig.
7A; Crawford and Zambryski,
2000 ,
2001 ; Boyko et al.,
2000a ,
2000b ;
Kotlizky et al., 2001 ). In
contrast, when MP30-GFP was expressed in the absence of MPB2C, 24% of
expressing cells show the cell wall-associated punctuate expression pattern
(compare Fig. 7A; K. Trutnyeva,
R. Bachmaier, and E. Waigmann, unpublished data). A similar effect on MP30-GFP
intracellular distribution was observed in Nicotiana benthamiana:
when MP30-GFP was expressed by itself, it localized to cell wall-associated
punctae in 61% of expressing cells (pattern similar to
Fig. 7A), whereas upon
co-expression with MPB2C-RFP, the cell wall-associated pattern of MP30-GFP was
detected in only 26% of expressing cells. The reduction in cell
wall-associated pattern was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the ER
and microtubule-associated expression pattern of MP30-GFP in the presence of
MPB2C-RFP (pattern similar to Fig. 6, B and
E). Thus, co-expression of MPB2C-RFP results in redistribution of
MP30-GFP from the cell periphery toward microtubule-associated sites, thereby
further supporting the concept that MPB2C and MP30 interact at microtubules in
vivo.

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Cell-to-cell movement of viral MPs in epidermal leaf cells expressing MPB2C
proteins. Analysis of expression and presentation of micrographs as described
in Figure 4, except that
experiments depicted in C to F were done in epidermal leaf cells of
N. benthamiana. A, Cell-to-cell movement of MP30-GFP in the
absence of MPB2C-RFP. *, Expressing cell. B, Lack of cell-to-cell movement in
cell co-expressing MP30-GFP and 1-66MPB2C-RFP. C, Cell-to-cell movement
of MPR3-GFP. D to F, Cell-to-cell movement of MPR3-GFP
in cell co-expressing 1-66MPB2C-RFP. D, 1-66MPB2C-RFP; E,
MPR3-GFP; F, merged image. G, Cell-to-cell movement of CMV3a-GFP. H
and I, Cell-to-cell movement of CMV3a-GFP in cells co-expressing MPB2C-RFP (H)
or 1-66MPB2C-RFP (I). In B, H, and I, merged images are shown.
Arrowheads point to MP30-GFP, MPR3-GFP, or CMV3a-GFP that has moved
into neighboring cell. Bar for A to C and H in H = 20 µm; bar for D to G
and I in I = 40 µm.
|
|
MPB2C Interferes with MP30 Cell-to-Cell Movement
Following biolistic bombardment of epidermal cells, MP30-GFP fusion
proteins are known to move from cell to cell via plasmodesmata
(Fig. 7A; Crawford and
Zambryski, 2000 ,
2001 ;
Kotlizky et al., 2001 ).
Interestingly, upon co-expression of MP30-GFP and MPB2C-RFP or
1-66MPB2C-RFP constructs, no MP30-GFP cell-to-cell movement to adjacent
cells could be detected in more than 50 cells evaluated on 10 independent
leaves from different N. tabacum plants
(Fig. 7B; compare also
Fig. 6, B, E, and H).
Inhibition of intercellular transport of MP30-GFP in cells expressing
MPB2C-RFP proteins could be due to specific interaction between MPB2C and MP30
or could result from general down-regulation of plasmodesmal transport
potentially induced by overexpression of MPB2C proteins. To discriminate
between these possibilities, the viral movement protein CMV3a, which is
functionally related to MP30 but does not interact with MPB2C in vitro
(compare Fig. 2B), was
employed. Like MP30-GFP, a GFP-tagged CMV3a fusion protein moves between cells
(Fig. 7G;
Itaya et al., 1997 ). Moreover,
even in the presence of the MPB2C-RFP protein variants, CMV3a-GFP cell-to-cell
movement was clearly detectable (Fig. 7, H
and I). Note that in co-expressing cells, CMV3a-GFP localization
did not overlap with that of MPB2C-RFP or 1-66MPB2C-RFP
(Fig. 7, H and I, respectively). Together, these results imply that MPB2C selectively interferes
with intercellular transport of MP30.
The negative effect on cell-to-cell transport of MP30-GFP might be due to
improper amounts of fluorescently tagged MPB2C proteins and/or the RFP tag
which might mask a potential positive involvement of MPB2C in MP30
cell-to-cell transport. To further clarify the function of MPB2C in
intercellular transport of MP30, we employed a L72V point mutant of MP30
(MPR3; Gillespie et al.,
2002 ; Toth et al.,
2002 ) with enhanced cell-to-cell movement capacity in N.
benthamiana. Because the MPR3 is primarily localized to
ER-associated sites (Gillespie et al.,
2002 ), we predicted that the MPR3 should not interact
with the microtubule-associated MPB2C protein. Consequently, transient
expression of MPB2C-RFP proteins should not lead to accumulation of
MPR3-GFP at microtubules and should not interfere with
MPR3 cell-to-cell movement. Because the MPR3 mutant has
been characterized in N. benthamiana, we used this host for
quantitative, comparative movement studies.
When MPR3-GFP was co-expressed with full-length MPB2C-RFP or
1-66MPB2C-RFP, the percentage of cells with movement was only slightly
reduced compared with the percentage observed in the control experiment where
no MPB2C variants were present (Table
II). In contrast, wild-type MP30-GFP movement was reduced to less
than one-half in the presence of MPB2C-RFP proteins
(Table II). Furthermore, in the
presence of co-expressed MPB2C-RFP proteins, the MPR3-GFP was not
observed to accumulate at microtubules but retained its ER-associated
localization pattern (Fig. 7,
DF). Results indicate that MPB2C and MPR3 are
present in different subcellular compartments, and thus do not interact in
vivo. Considering that the MPR3 protein is movement competent,
these data suggest that interaction with MPB2C is not required for movement of
MPR3.
We further tested whether in vitro binding between MPB2C and
MPR3 would be reduced as compared with binding between MPB2C and
MP30. For this purpose, MPR3 and MP30 were overexpressed and
purified from E. coli (Fig.
8A). Equal amounts of purified MPR3 and MP30 protein
were blotted onto nitrocellulose, renatured, and overlayed with purified MPB2C
protein. Binding of MPB2C to MP30 or MPR3 was detected with an
antibody directed against the MPB2C protein. Several molar ratios of MPB2C to
MPR3 and MP30 were tested. When the molar amount of MPB2C exceeded
that of MPR3 or MP30 2-fold, MPR3 showed slightly
reduced binding to MPB2C as compared with MP30
(Fig. 8B, compare lanes
MPR3 and MP30). When MPB2C was present at a 2.5-fold lower molar
amount than MPR3 or MP30, binding of MPB2C to MPR3 was
clearly reduced as compared with MP30 (Fig.
8C, compare lanes MPR3 and MP30). Together, these
results indicate that in vitro MPB2C binds with lower affinity to the
MPR3 protein than to the MP30 protein.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. Comparison of MP30 and MPR3 binding to MPB2C. A, Western blot of
purified MPR3 and MP30 detected by anti-MP30 antibody. B and C,
Renatured blot overlay assay. Twenty-three picomoles of MP30 and
MPR3 was overlayed with 45 pmol of MPB2C (B) or 9 pmol of MPB2C (C)
in the overlay mixture. Binding was detected by anti-MPB2C antibody. Arrow
points to MP30 or MPR3, respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The frequently observed localization patterns of MP30 comprising
accumulation at ER-associated punctae, microtubules, large bodies, and cell
wall-associated punctae have been combined in a model for TMV cell-to-cell
transport that involves transfer of MP30 and viral RNA from the ER via a
microtubular delivery mechanism toward and through plasmodesmata
(Lazarowitz and Beachy, 1999 ;
Tzfira et al., 2000 ;
Haywood et al., 2002 ;
Heinlein, 2002 ), thereby
indicating a movement promoting role of microtubules in transport of the
MP30-vRNA complex (Heinlein et al.,
1995 ,
1998 ;
McLean et al., 1995 ;
Mas and Beachy, 2000 ; Boyko et
al., 2000a ,
2000b ;
Kotlizky et al., 2001 ). On the
other hand, microtubules have also been implicated in MP30 degradation
(Padgett et al., 1996 ;
Mas and Beachy, 1999 ;
Reichel and Beachy, 2000 ). In
line, an MP30 mutant that escapes accumulation at microtubules but displays
enhanced cell-to-cell movement was recently described (MPR3;
Gillespie et al., 2002 ),
indicating that accumulation at microtubules is detrimental for MP30
movement.
The complex MP30 localization pattern likely requires interaction with
several plant endogenous factors. Here, we describe the isolation and
characterization of a previously uncharacterized, plant-specific MP30-binding
protein, MPB2C, that localizes in discrete punctae to microtubules. The
C-terminal one-third of the 321-amino acid-long MPB2C is sufficient to bind
MP30. The N-terminal part of MPB2C harbors a hydrophobic region and a
coiled-coil domain involved in association to microtubules. As shown by
northern and western analysis, MPB2C is constitutively expressed in N.
tabacum leaf tissue. Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing data on the
Arabidopsis homolog of MPB2C also demonstrate constitutive expression at low
levels throughout plant tissues
(http://allometra.com/mpss.shtml),
indicating a general housekeeping function of MPB2C.
The localization of MPB2C to discrete punctae along microtubules points to
the presence of specific target sites on microtubules and is reminiscent of
patterns observed for other microtubule-associated proteins such as a
kinesin-related motor protein (Cai et al.,
2000 ) or microtubule-plus end-associated proteins, for example
CLIP-170 (Perez et al., 1999 ).
Interestingly, the localization of MPB2C to discrete punctae shifts toward a
more continuous decoration of microtubules when its 66 N-terminal amino acids
are deleted (compare Fig. 4, A and
B). Similar observations with CLIP-170 deletion mutants were
interpreted as evidence for regions in the CLIP-170 protein that control and
regulate its binding to microtubules
(Pierre et al., 1994 ). In
line, the N-terminal region of MPB2C might also exert a modulating function on
microtubule binding of MPB2C.
What may be the nature of large bodies that are detected in addition to
microtubule-associated punctae upon transient expression of MPB2C? In
co-expression experiments, MPB2C bodies are also tagged by MP30-GFP and
MAP4-GFP and form in close proximity to the microtubular network (compare
Fig. 4, DF), suggesting
that these bodies may contain a mixture of microtubule-associated proteins.
Interestingly, microtubule-connected bodies are also observed upon
overexpression of CLIP-170-GFP (Perez et
al., 1999 ) and tubulin-GFP (F. Kragler, unpublished data) and upon
expression of MP30-GFP either by itself
(Kotlizky et al., 2001 ; K.
Trutnyeva and E. Waigmann, unpublished data) or in the context of the virus
(Gillespie et al., 2002 ),
suggesting that their formation might represent a general response to
high-level expression of microtubule-associated proteins.
In transient expression studies, both full-length MPB2C and
1-66MPB2C colocalize to MP30 at the level of microtubules and
effectively interfere with MP30 localization to the characteristic punctuate
pattern, indicating plasmodesmal localization (compare
Fig. 7A). In contrast, MPB2C
neither colocalizes to ER-associated MP30 nor was it observed to interfere
with MP30 ER localization. This is in line with the view that MP30 is located
at the ER before its transfer onto microtubules or transport toward
plasmodesmata (Gillespie et al.,
2002 ; K. Trutnyeva, R. Bachmaier, and E. Waigmann, unpublished
data).
Functional analysis by transient expression studies revealed a specific,
MPB2C-mediated decrease in MP30 cell-to-cell movement, suggesting a negative
impact of MPB2C on MP30 transport activity. The negative effect of MPB2C on
MP30 transport activity was analyzed in two different host plants and varied
from a complete block in N. tabacum to a more than 50% reduction in
N. benthamiana. This host-dependent difference may be correlated to
the well-known high susceptibility of N. benthamiana for viral
infection (Gibbs et al., 1997 )
and the less tightly controlled plasmodesmal transport activity of N.
benthamiana as compared with N. tabacum
(Waigmann et al., 2000 ).
Further support for a non-movement-promoting role of MPB2C was derived from
analyzing the impact of MPB2C proteins on intercellular transport activity of
MPR3, an L72V point mutant of MP30 with improved cell-to-cell
movement capacity and decreased affinity for microtubules
(Gillespie et al., 2002 ;
Toth et al., 2002 ).
Cell-to-cell transport of MPR3-GFP was not impaired by the presence
of MPB2C proteins (Table II).
Moreover, even in the presence of MPB2C proteins, MPR3-GFP was
located at the ER (Fig. 7,
DF; Gillespie et al.,
2002 ) and was not redistributed to microtubules. These results
suggest that MPR3 and MPB2C do not encounter each other in living
cells and because the MPR3 protein is highly movement competent
(Table II;
Gillespie et al., 2002 ), that
interaction with MPB2C is not required for MPR3 cell-to-cell
movement. In support, in vitro binding of MPR3 to MPB2C is reduced
when compared with binding between MP30 and MPB2C
(Fig. 8). This reduction in
binding affinity, likely together with changes in binding affinity to other
cellular factors, may contribute to the difference in subcellular localization
of MPR3 as compared with MP30 and to the lack of inhibition of
MPR3 cell-to-cell movement in the presence of transiently expressed
MPB2C proteins.
Considering that the MPR3 protein and wild-type MP30 are
distinguished only by a point mutation, it is likely that the two proteins
move cell-to-cell via a similar mechanism, and that interaction with MPB2C
might also not be required for cell-to-cell movement of wild-type MP30.
Because the MPR3 protein is characterized by enhanced transport
activity and because we observed an MPB2C-mediated decrease of MP30 transport
activity in transient expression studies, we presently favor the hypothesis
that endogenous MPB2C serves a negative role in MP30 cell-to-cell transport.
However, to further elucidate and define the function of MPB2C in cell-to-cell
transport of TMV-MP and in intercellular spread of TMV, it will be necessary
to generate plants with reduced endogenous MPB2C levels such as anti-sense or
silenced plants.
In line with our hypothesis, we propose a model wherein endogenous MPB2C
encounters and binds to MP30 at microtubules and acts in a pathway that
promotes MP30 accumulation at microtubules. This pathway is not involved in
MP30 cell-to-cell transport but might be assigned for degradation as
previously suggested (Padgett et al.,
1996 ; Mas and Beachy,
1999 ; Reichel and Beachy,
2000 ; Gillespie et al.,
2002 ). When MPB2C is present at endogenous levels, a number of
MP30 molecules produced in infected cells escape the MPB2C involving
microtubular accumulation pathway and engage in cell-to-cell transport. When
MPB2C is transiently overexpressed, the equilibrium is shifted toward the
MPB2C pathway, and directs MP30 away from the cell-to-cell transport pathway
toward accumulation at microtubules. Hence we observed a negative effect of
MPB2C on MP30 movement in the transient overexpression assay.
In summary, we report the identification and characterization of MPB2C, a
plant endogenous, microtubule-localized MP30 interaction partner. Future
studies will be directed toward a detailed evaluation of the impact of MPB2C
on local and systemic spread of TMV and to reveal the as yet unknown
endogenous function of the MPB2C protein.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Plant Growth Conditions
Six- to 8-week-old Nicotiana tabacum cv Turkish or Nicotiana
benthamiana plants were used. Plants were grown in a controlled
environment with a cycle of 16 h of light at 22°C and 8 h of darkness at
20°C.
Bait Plasmid and SRS cDNA Library Construction
Conventional PCR cloning techniques were employed to construct the MP30-Sos
expressing bait plasmids ADNS-MP30 and ADNS 1-58MP30. pET-MP30 DNA was
amplified with primers FK63
(5'-GATCCCAAGCTTAGGATCCAGAAGATGGCTCTAGTTGTTAAAGG-3') and FK70
(5'-CGGAGCCCGGGAAACGAATCCGATTCGGCG-3') and was ligated as
HindIII-XbaI fragments (partial HindIII digest for
full-length MP30 open reading frame) into HindIII-XbaI
digested ADNS 5'SOS vector (Aronheim
et al., 1997 ). After sequencing, cdc25-2 yeast was transformed
with ADNS-MP30 and ADNS 1-58MP30, and MP30 expression was verified with
polyclonal rabbit MP30 antibody (data not shown). Poly(A+)-RNA was
isolated from the following tissues of N. tabacum cv Turkish
plants according to information supplied by the manufacturer (RNeasy plant
mini kit and Oligotex mRNA kit, Qiagen USA, Valencia, CA): leaves (sink and
source), inflorescence and shoot apex including young leaves (< 1 cm),
stem, and whole young plants (4 cm high). A directional cDNA synthesis was
carried out (cDNA synthesis kit, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and the resulting
EcoRI-XhoI cDNA fragments with sizes >200 bp were ligated
with EcoRI-XhoI-digested YES polyA plasmid
(Aronheim et al., 1997 ) and
transformed into Epicurian Coli XL1-Blue MRF' supercompetent
Escherichia coli cells following the manufacturer's instructions
(Stratagene). Transformed E. coli cells were grown in LB-Amp
media (Ausubel et al., 1987 ),
and cDNA plasmids were isolated (Plasmid Midi kit, Qiagen USA).
SRS Screen
Compositions of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Gal and Glc
containing growth media and transformation reaction techniques and growth
conditions were employed as described
(Ausubel et al., 1987 ;
Aronheim et al., 1997 ) with the
following exception: The thermosensitive yeast cdc25-2 (Mat , ura3-5,
his3-200, ade2-101, lys2-801, trp1-109, leu2-3, cdc25-2, and Gal-) strains
transformed with library plasmid and various bait plasmids were first
incubated in a 21°C incubation chamber on selectable Glc plates
(non-restrictive conditions). Subsequently, colonies of transformed cells were
replica plated in parallel onto plates containing Gal- or Glc-selective
medium. Plates were incubated at 36C° (restrictive conditions) for >5 d
to evaluate bait-prey interaction-mediated growth complementation of the
cdc25-2 ts phenotype (Aronheim et al.,
1997 ). Standard control plasmids ADNS-5'p110-SOS, YESM7,
YESMpolyA, and YESM polyA are described
(Aronheim et al., 1997 ; SRS
protocol provided by A. Aronheim to F.K.).
RNA Expression Analysis and RACE
Poly(A+)-RNA was isolated as described above, and northern
analysis was carried out using the NorthernMax-Gly Kit according to the
manufacturer's protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX). An MPB2C-specific probe was
produced by PCR of the library plasmid YES-MPB2Clib with primers
FK76 and FK94. The ubiquitin-specific probe was prepared as described
(Sablowski and Meyerowitz,
1998 ). Probes were radioactively labeled with Random primed DNA
labeling kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche Diagnostics,
Mannheim, Germany). Note that the hybridized blot was exposed five times
longer compared with the ubiquitin probed membrane to observe the MPB2C
signal. To obtain full-length MPB2C cDNA, 5'-RACE reactions were carried
out following the instructions supplied by the manufacturer
(Marathona cDNA amplification kit; BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo
Alto, CA) using primers FK100
(5'-TTATGTTCTCAGAACAAGTGATTTTGCAGG-3') and FK110
(5'-ATCTCATGAGGATCCCCTGTTCTCAGAAC-3').
Production of MPB2C Protein and Anti-MPB2C Antibodies
A glutathionine S-transferase (GST)-MPB2C expression construct was
obtained by PCR amplification of MPB2C from 35S::MPB2C-RFP using primers
5'-GCAGGATCCGATGACGATGACAAGATGGCGCTTGCATTTG-3' and
5'-GCAGAATTCTTATGTTCTCAGAACAAG-3'. The resulting fragment was
digested with BamHI/EcoRI and was cloned into
BamHI/EcoRI-digested vector pGEX-6P-1 encoding a GST moiety
followed by a PreScission Protease cleavage site (Amersham Biosciences,
Uppsala) to yield construct pGEX-MPB2C. To obtain soluble GST-MPB2C,
BL21-CodonPlus bacteria transformed with pGEX-MPB2C were grown at 30°C
until optical density = 0.6. Induction was performed with 0.1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside for 1 h at 15°C.
Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and were lysed by sonication in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Ausubel et
al., 1987 ) containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and Protease Inhibitor
Cocktail Tablets (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). To obtain purified MPB2C
protein, cleared supernatant was incubated with Glutathione Sepharose 4B
(Amersham Biosciences) and was subsequently released from the matrix with
PreScission Protease according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham
Biosciences). Because purified MPB2C protein migrated aberrantly high on
denaturing polyacrylamide gels (observed molecular mass, approximately 40 kD;
calculated molecular mass, 36 kD) the identity of MPB2C was confirmed by
N-terminal sequencing and mass spectroscopy before antibody production.
Polyclonal antibodies against MPB2C were obtained by immunization of rabbit
with 200 µg of purified MPB2C and a boost with 150 µg of purified MPB2C
after 8 weeks.
Western-Blot Analysis of MPB2C Protein
N. tabacum leaf tissue was frozen and ground to powder in
liquid N2. Proteins were extracted by shaking the powder in the
same volume of 2x Laemmli sample buffer
(Ausubel et al., 1987 ) for 30
min and boiling for 10 min. The extract was cleared from insoluble material by
ultracentrifugation at 35,000g for 1 h. Proteins were separated on
denaturing polyacrylamide gels and were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane.
The blot was blocked in 5% (w/v) milk powder, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, and 150 mM NaCl (M-TBS) for 30 min, incubated for 2 h with
anti-MPB2C antibodies or preimmune serum at a dilution of 1:1,000 in M-TBS,
washed three times with M-TBS, and then incubated for 1 h with alkaline
phosphatase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL) at a
dilution of 1:2,000 in M-TBS. After washing three times with M-TBS and
Tris-buffered saline, the blot was developed with nitroblue tetrazolium
chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate.
In Vitro Interaction of MPB2C and MP30
The MPB2C cDNA fragment isolated in the SRS-screen was PCR amplified with
specific primers FK76
(5'-CCGGCTCGAGAGTTAAGTTAGCTGACAAGAAAGCAGC-3') and FK94
(5'-CGGAATTCCGTTAAGTTAGCTGACAAGAAAGCAGCGGTAG-3') and was cloned as
an XhoI/EcoRI fragment into
XhoI/EcoRI-digested pRSETA to obtain the expression plasmid
pRSETA- 1-197MPB2C giving rise to protein tag-MPB2Clib. The
MPR3 coding sequence was amplified by PCR from plasmid
MPR3:GFP (Gillespie et al.,
2002 ) using primers R3start (5'-GCACATATGGCTCTAGTTGTTAAAGG)
and R3back (5'-GCAGGATCCTTAAAAGGAATCCGATTCGGC) and was cloned as an
NdeI/BamHI fragment into NdeI/BamHI
digested pET3A vector giving rise to expression plasmid pET-MPR3.
MP30, MPR3, and CMV3a proteins were overexpressed in E.
coli from plasmids pET-MP30
(Citovsky et al., 1990 ),
pET-MPR3, and pET-CMV3a (Li and
Palukaitis, 1996 ), respectively. Inclusion body isolation, PAGE,
and western blotting were done as described
(Citovsky et al., 1990 ).
Tag-MPB2Clib was overexpressed from plasmid
pRSETA- 1-197MPB2C, and western-blot analysis of tag-MPB2Clib
was done according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Conditions for renatured blot overlay assay are based on previously described
dot-blot assays (Kragler et al.,
1998 ). In brief, MP30 and CMV3a were blotted onto nitrocellulose
membranes, treated twice for 15 min at room temperature with incubation buffer
(40 mM HEPES, pH 6.8, and 10% [v/v] glycerol) containing 0.2% (v/v)
Triton X-100 and Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets (Roche
Diagnostics). After washing three times and blocking the membrane with overlay
buffer (incubation buffer containing 0.1% [v/v] Tween 20 and 2% [w/v] bovine
serum albumin), nitrocellulose stripes were overlaid with overlay buffer
containing total E. coli lysate from cells expressing
tag-MPB2Clib protein or the Anti-Xpress-tag protein alone. For
competition experiments, an approximately 50x molar access of purified
MP30 over MPB2Clib was added to the overlay buffer. After 48 h of
incubation at 10°C, washing five times with overlay buffer, and treatment
with incubation buffer containing 2% (v/v) diglutaraldehyde for 1 min at room
temperature, bound MPB2Clib was detected with commercially
available Anti-Xpress-tag antibody following the manufacturer's protocol
(Invitrogen). In experiments designed to compare the affinity of MP30 and that
of MPR3 with MPB2C, 0.7 µg corresponding to 23 pmol of MP30 and
MPR3 protein, respectively, was blotted onto nitrocellulose. A
small strip encompassing the MP30 and MPR3 bands was cut out and
incubated with either 45 or 9 pmol of MPB2C protein in overlay buffer. The
experimental procedure for renatured blot overlay assay was as described
above. Binding of MPB2C was detected with anti-MPB2C antibody at a dilution of
1:2,000.
Protoplast Preparation and Immunofluorescence
Protoplasts were prepared as described previously
(Koop et al., 1996 ) and were
fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (Science Services, Munich, Germany) and 5%
(v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Fixed protoplasts
were washed five times with PBS and were incubated with anti-MPB2C antibody or
preimmune serum at a dilution of 1:20 and mouse anti- -tubulin antibody
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at a dilution of 1:1,000 in PBS for 1 h. After
washing five times with PBS, protoplasts were incubated for 1 h with Alexa
Fluor 488-coupled goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 568-coupled goat anti-mouse
secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:1,000 in PBS. After washing
three times in PBS, protoplasts were mounted on slides and analyzed by
confocal microscopy.
Construction and Transient Expression of GFP and RFP Fusion
Proteins
The pUC18-based vectors pZY226 and pZY260 containing a 10x Ala linker
at the C or N terminus of a 35S driven mGFP6, respectively, were a generous
gift to F.K. by D. Jackson (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY). GFP expression vectors producing soluble smGFP (CD3326;
Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center, Ohio State University, Columbus),
ER-GFP (Haseloff et al.,
1997 ), MAP4-GFP (Marc et al.,
1998 ), CMV3a-GFP (Itaya et
al., 1997 ), MP30-GFP (McLean
et al., 1995 ), and MPR3-GFP
(Gillespie et al., 2002 ) were
described previously. Plasmid 35S::RFP was a generous gift from V. Citovsky
(State University of New York, Stony Brook).
To obtain MPB2C-RFP fusion proteins with a separating Ala linker between
the two protein moieties, a 35S::GFP-RFP plasmid was constructed first by
cloning a SalI/XbaI-digested RFP PCR fragment amplified from
pDsRed1-N1 (BD Biosciences Clontech) using primers FK111
(5'-GCCGTCGACATGGTGCGCTCCTCC-3') and FK112
(5'-CGCCTCTAGACTACAGGAACAGGTGG-3') into
SalI/XbaI-digested pZY260. A BamHI/XbaI
fragment of the 35S::GFP-RFP plasmid containing the Ala linker and RFP was
ligated with BsaI(NcoI)/BamHI-digested MPB2C PCR fragments
(primer combinations: FK131 (5'-GCCGGTCTCCCATGGCGCTTGCATTTGAC-3')
or FK 114 (5'-GCCGGTCTCCCATGACCTATACCAAA-3') with FK110) into
NcoI/XbaI-digested pZY226 resulting in expression plasmids
35S::MPB2C-RFP or 35S:: 1-66MPB2C-RFP. Construct
35S:: 1-214MBP2C-GFP was generated by PCR amplification of MPB2C with
primers FK132 (5'-AGGTCATGACTTCCAGCAAG-3') and FK110
(5'-GATCTCATGAGGATCCCCTGTTCTCAGAAC-3') and subsequent cloning of
the resulting fragment into vector pZY260.
Transient Expression and Confocal Microscopy
DNA was coated onto 1-µm gold particles, and N.
tabacum or N. benthamiana source leaves (>20 cm)
were bombarded using a Helios Gene Gun following the manufacturer's protocol
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Each bombardment experiment was repeated
at least five times with the total number of analyzed cells ranging from 40 to
100. Images were obtained with a TCS-SP confocal microscope (Leica
Microsystems, Heidelberg). GFP and RFP were excited with a ArKr laser at 476
and 568 nm, respectively. GFP was detected at 500 to 520 nm, and RFP was
detected at 600 to 620 nm. Micrographs were assembled from serial optical
sections and were prepared for presentation by Photoshop 5.1 software (Adobe
Systems, San Jose, CA).
Accession Numbers
The cDNA sequence of MPB2C has been deposited at GenBank under accession
number AF326729.
Distribution of Materials
Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be
made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes with the
exception of the anti-MPB2C antibodies, which are available only in limited
amounts.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank A. Aronheim for providing plasmids and the yeast strain required
for the SRS screen. We are also indebted to Dave Jackson for providing vectors
pZY260 and pZY226, to Peter Palukaitis for providing vector pET-CMV3a, to
Vitaly Citovsky for providing vector 35S::RFP, to Biao Ding for providing
vector pRTL-CMV3a-GFP, to Richard Cyr for providing a MAP4-GFP expression
construct, and to Karl Oparka for providing MPR3-GFP expression
construct. E.W. is thankful to Andrea Barta for her invaluable support
throughout the whole project.
Received March 5, 2003;
returned for revision March 21, 2003;
accepted April 24, 2003.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.022269.
1 This work was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (grant nos.
P12614MOB and Sfb17, project part 08 to E.W.). E.W. was supported by an
Austrian Programme for Advanced Research and Technology fellowship (APART 441)
from the Austrian Academy of Science. 
2 Present address: Section of Plant Science, University of California Davis,
One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616. 
3 These authors contributed equally to this paper. 
*
Corresponding author; e-mail
waigmann{at}bch.univie.ac.at;
fax 43142779616.
 |
LITERATURE CITED
|
|---|
Aronheim A, Zandi E, Hennemann H, Elledge SJ, Karin M
(1997) Isolation of an AP-1 repressor by a novel method for
detecting protein-protein interactions. Mol Cell Biol
17:
30943102[Abstract]
Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Smith JA, Seidman
JG, Struhl K (1987) Current Protocols in
Molecular Biology. Greene Publishing-Wiley Interscience, New
York
Boyko V, Ferralli J, Ashby J, Schellenbaum P, Heinlein M
(2000a) Function of microtubules in intercellular transport of
plant virus RNA. Nat Cell Biol 2:
826832[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Boyko V, Ferralli J, Heinlein M (2000b)
Cell-to-cell movement of TMV RNA is temperature-dependent and corresponds to
the association of movement protein with microtubuli. Plant J
22:
315325[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Brill LM, Nunn SR, Kahn TW, Yeager M, Beachy RN
(2000) Recombinant tobacco mosaic virus movement protein is an
RNA-binding, -helical membrane protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 97:
71127117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Cai G, Romagnoli S, Moscatelli A, Ovidi E, Gambellini G, Tiezzi
A, Cresti M (2000) Identification and characterization
of a novel microtubule-based motor associated with membranous organelles in
tobacco pollen tubes. Plant Cell
12:
17191736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC
(1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression.
Science 263:
802805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chen M-H, Sheng J, Hind G, Handa AK, Citovsky V
(2000) Interaction between the tobacco mosaic virus movement
protein and host cell pectin methylesterases is required for viral
cell-to-cell movement. EMBO J 19:
913920[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Citovsky V, Knorr D, Schuster G, Zambryski P
(1990) The P30 movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus is a
single strand nucleic acid binding protein. Cell
60:
637647[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Citovsky V, McLean BG, Zupan J, Zambryski P
(1993) Phosphorylation of tobacco mosaic virus cell-to-cell
movement protein by a developmentally-regulated plant cell wall-associated
protein kinase. Genes Dev 7:
904910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Crawford KM, Zambryski PC (2000) Subcellular
localization determines the availability of non-targeted proteins to
plasmodesmatal transport. Curr Biol
10:
10321040[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Crawford KM, Zambryski PC (2001) Non-targeted
and targeted protein movement through plasmodesmata in leaves in different
developmental and physiological states. Plant Physiol
125:
18021812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Desvoyes B, Faure-Rabasse S, Chen M-H, Park J-W, Scholthof
HB (2002) A novel plant homeodomain protein interacts in a
functionally relevant manner with a virus movement protein. Plant
Physiol 129:
15211532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Dorokhov YL, Makinen K, Frolova OY, Merits A, Saarinen J,
Kalkkinen N, Atabekov JG, Saarma M (1999) A novel
function for a ubiquitous plant enzyme pectin methylesterase: the host-cell
receptor for the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein. FEBS
Lett 461:
223228[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gibbs MJ, Armstrong J, Weiller GF, Gibbs AJ
(1997) Virus evolution: the past, a window on the future?
In M Tepfer, E Balazs, eds, Virus-Resistant Transgenic Plants:
Potential Ecological Impact. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp
117
Gillespie T, Boevink P, Haupt S, Roberts AG, Toth R, Valentine
T, Chapman S, Oparka KJ (2002) Functional analysis of
a DNA-shuffled movement protein reveals that microtubules are dispensable for
the cell-to-cell movement of tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell
14:
12071222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge SSO
(1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization
of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis
plants brightly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
21222127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Haywood V, Kragler F, Lucas W (2002)
Plasmodesmata: pathways for protein and ribonucleoprotein signaling.
Plant Cell Suppl 14:
S303S325
Heinlein M (2002) The spread of tobacco mosaic
virus infection: insights into the cellular mechanism of RNA transport.
Cell Mol Life Sci 59:
5882[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Heinlein M, Epel BL, Padgett SH, Beachy RN
(1995) Interaction of tobamovirus movement proteins with the
plant cytoskeleton. Science 270:
19831985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Heinlein M, Padgett HS, Gens JS, Pickard BG, Caspar SJ, Epel BL,
Beachy RN (1998) Changing patterns of localization of
the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein and replicase to the endoplasmic
reticulum and microtubules during infection. Plant Cell
10:
11071120[Medline]
Huang Z, Andrianov VM, Han Y, Howell SH (2001)
Identification of Arabidopsis proteins that interact with the cauliflower
mosaic virus (CaMV) movement protein. Plant Mol Biol
47:
663675[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Itaya A, Hickman H, Bao Y, Nelson R, Ding B
(1997) Cell-to-cell trafficking of cucumber mosaic virus movement
protein:green fluorescent protein fusion produced by biolistic bombardment in
tobacco. Plant J 12:
12231230[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kahn T, Lapidot M, Heinlein M, Reichel C, Cooper B, Gafny R,
Beachy RN (1998) Domains of the TMV movement protein
involved in subcellular localization. Plant J
15:
1525[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Koop H-U, Steinmüller K, Wagner H, Rössler C, Eibl C,
Sacher L (1996) Integration of foreign sequences into the
tobacco plastome via polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation.
Planta 199:
193201[Web of Science][Medline]
Kotlizky G, Katz A, van der Laak J, Boyko V, Lapidot M, Beachy
RN, Heinlein M, Epel BL (2001) A dysfunctional
movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus interferes with targeting of
wild-type movement protein to microtubules. Mol Plant-Microbe
Interact 14:
895904[Web of Science][Medline]
Kragler F, Monzer J, Shash K, Xonocostle-Cázares B, Lucas
WJ (1998) Cell-to-cell transport of proteins: requirement for
unfolding and characterization of binding to a putative plasmodesmal receptor.
Plant J 15:
367381[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for
displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol
157:
105142[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lazarowitz SG, Beachy RN (1999) Viral movement
proteins as probes for intracellular and intercellular trafficking in plants.
Plant Cell 11:
535548[Free Full Text]
Lee J-Y, Yoo B-C, Rojas MR, Gomez-Ospina N, Staehelin LA, Lucas
WJ (2003) Selective trafficking of non-cell-autonomous
proteins mediated by NtNCAPP1. Science
299:
392396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Li Q, Palukaitis P (1996) Comparison of the
nucleic acid- and NTP-binding properties of the movement protein of cucumber
mosaic cucumovirus and tobacco mosaic tobamovirus. Virology
216:
7179[CrossRef][Medline]
Lin B, Heaton LA (2001) An Arabidopsis
thaliana protein interacts with a movement protein of turnip crinkle
virus in yeast cells and in vitro. J Gen Virol
82:
12451251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lucas WJ (1995) Plasmodesmata: intercellular
channels for macromolecular transport in plants. Curr Opin Cell
Biol 7:
673680[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lupas A, van Dyke M, Stock J (1991) Predicting
coiled coils from protein sequences. Science
252:
11621164[Free Full Text]
Marc J, Granger CL, Brincat J, Fisher DD, Kao T, McCubbin AG,
Cyr RJ (1998) A GFP-MAP4 reporter gene for visualizing
cortical microtubule rearrangements in living epidermal cells. Plant
Cell 10:
19271939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Mas P, Beachy R (1999) Replication of tobacco
mosaic virus on endoplasmic reticulum and role of the cytoskeleton and virus
movement protein in intracellular distribution of viral RNA. J Cell
Biol 147:
945958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Mas P, Beachy R (2000) Role of microtubules in
the intracellular distribution of tobacco mosaic virus movement protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:
1234512349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Matsushita Y, Miyakawa M, Nisiguchi M, Nyunoya H
(2002) Cloning of a tobacco cDNA coding for a putative
transcriptional coactivator MBF1 that interacts with the tomato mosaic virus
movement protein. J Exp Bot 53:
15311532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Matz MV, Fradkov AF, Labas YA, Savitsky AP, Zaraisky AG,
Markelov ML, Lukyanov SA (1999) Fluorescent proteins
from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species. Nat Biotechnol
17:
969973[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
McLean BG, Zambryski P (2000) Interactions
between viral movement proteins and the cytoskeleton. In CJ Staiger,
F Baluska, D Volkmann, PW Barlow, eds, Actin: A Dynamic Framework for
Multiple Plant Cell Functions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands
McLean BG, Zupan J, Zambryski PC (1995) TMV P30
movement protein associates with the cytoskeleton in tobacco cells.
Plant Cell 7:
21012114[Abstract]
Padgett HS, Epel BL, Kahn TW, Heinlein M, Watanabe Y, Beachy
RN (1996) Distribution of tobamovirus movement protein in
infected cells and implications for cell-to-cell spread of infection.
Plant J 10:
10791088[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to
display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl
Biosci 12:
357358[Free Full Text]
Pearson WR, Lipman DJ (1988) Improved tools for
biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:
24442448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Perez F, Diamantopoulos GS, Stalder R, Kreis TE
(1999) CLIP-170highlights growing microtubule ends in
vivo. Cell 96:
517527[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pierre P, Pepperkok R, Kreis TE (1994)
Molecular characterization of two functional domains of CLIP-170 in
vivo. J Cell Sci 107:
19091920[Abstract]
Reichel C, Beachy RN (1998) Tobacco mosaic
virus infection induces severe morphological changes of the endoplasmic
reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
1116911174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Reichel C, Beachy RN (2000) Degradation of
tobacco mosaic virus movement protein by the 26S proteasome. J
Virol 74:
33303337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sablowski RWM, Meyerowitz EM (1998) A homolog
of NO APICAL MERISTEM is an immediate target of the floral homeotic genes
APETALA3/PISTILLATA. Cell 92:
93103[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Soellick T-R, Uhrig JF, Bucher GL, Kellmann J-W, Schreier PH
(2000) The movement protein NSm of tomato spotted wilt tospovirus
(TSWV): RNA binding, interaction with the TSWV N protein, and identification
of interacting plant proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97:
23732378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994)
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence
alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and
weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res
22:
46734680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Toth RL, Pogue GP, Chapman S (2002) Improvement
of a plant virus based vector through DNA shuffling. Plant J
30:
593600[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tzfira T, Rhee Y, Chen M-H, Citovsky V (2000)
Nucleic acid transport in plant-microbe interactions: the molecules that walk
through the walls. Annu Rev Microbiol
54:
187219[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Waigmann E, Chen M-H, Bachmaier R, Goshroy S, Citovsky V
(2000) Regulation of plasmodesmal transport by phosphorylation of
tobacco mosaic virus cell-to-cell movement protein. EMBO J
19:
48754884[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Waigmann E, Lucas W, Citovsky V, Zambryski P
(1994) Direct functional assay for tobacco mosaic virus
cell-to-cell movement protein and identification of a domain involved in
increasing plasmodesmal permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
14331437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wolf S, Deom CM, Beachy RN, Lucas WJ (1989)
Movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus modifies plasmodesmatal size
exclusion limit. Science 246:
377379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Xia G, Ramachandran S, Hong Y, Chan y, Simanis V, Chua N-H
(1996) Identification of plant cytoskeletal, cell cycle-related
and polarity-related proteins using Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Plant J 10:
761769[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yamanaka T, Ohta T, Takahashi M, Meshi T, Schmidt R, Dean C,
Naito S, Ishikawa M (2000) TOM1, an Arabidopsis gene
required for efficient multiplication of a tobamovirus, encodes a putative
transmembrane protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97:
1010710112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Plett, J. Mathur, and S. Regan
Ethylene receptor ETR2 controls trichome branching by regulating microtubule assembly in Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2009;
60(13):
3923 - 3933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ruggenthaler, D. Fichtenbauer, J. Krasensky, C. Jonak, and E. Waigmann
Microtubule-Associated Protein AtMPB2C Plays a Role in Organization of Cortical Microtubules, Stomata Patterning, and Tobamovirus Infectivity
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2009;
149(3):
1354 - 1365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ben-Nissan, W. Cui, D.-J. Kim, Y. Yang, B.-C. Yoo, and J.-Y. Lee
Arabidopsis Casein Kinase 1-Like 6 Contains a Microtubule-Binding Domain and Affects the Organization of Cortical Microtubules
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2008;
148(4):
1897 - 1907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Buschmann and C. W. Lloyd
Arabidopsis Mutants and the Network of Microtubule-Associated Functions
Mol Plant,
November 1, 2008;
1(6):
888 - 898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Bolduc, S. Hake, and D. Jackson
Dual Functions of the KNOTTED1 Homeodomain: Sequence-Specific DNA Binding and Regulation of Cell-to-Cell Transport
Sci. Signal.,
June 10, 2008;
1(23):
pe28 - pe28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Brandner, A. Sambade, E. Boutant, P. Didier, Y. Mely, C. Ritzenthaler, and M. Heinlein
Tobacco Mosaic Virus Movement Protein Interacts with Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Microtubule End-Binding Protein 1
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2008;
147(2):
611 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Winter, G. Kollwig, S. Zhang, and F. Kragler
MPB2C, a Microtubule-Associated Protein, Regulates Non-Cell-Autonomy of the Homeodomain Protein KNOTTED1
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2007;
19(10):
3001 - 3018.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Curin, E.-L. Ojangu, K. Trutnyeva, B. Ilau, E. Truve, and E. Waigmann
MPB2C, a Microtubule-Associated Plant Factor, Is Required for Microtubular Accumulation of Tobacco Mosaic Virus Movement Protein in Plants
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2007;
143(2):
801 - 811.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ashby, E. Boutant, M. Seemanpillai, A. Sambade, C. Ritzenthaler, and M. Heinlein
Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein functions as a structural microtubule-associated protein.
J. Virol.,
September 1, 2006;
80(17):
8329 - 8344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kurata, T. Ishida, C. Kawabata-Awai, M. Noguchi, S. Hattori, R. Sano, R. Nagasaka, R. Tominaga, Y. Koshino-Kimura, T. Kato, et al.
Cell-to-cell movement of the CAPRICE protein in Arabidopsis root epidermal cell differentiation
Development,
December 15, 2005;
132(24):
5387 - 5398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Nelson and V. Citovsky
Plant Viruses. Invaders of Cells and Pirates of Cellular Pathways
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2005;
138(4):
1809 - 1814.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Boevink and K. J. Oparka
Virus-Host Interactions during Movement Processes
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2005;
138(4):
1815 - 1821.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Z. Liu, E. B. Blancaflor, and R. S. Nelson
The Tobacco Mosaic Virus 126-Kilodalton Protein, a Constituent of the Virus Replication Complex, Alone or within the Complex Aligns with and Traffics along Microfilaments
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2005;
138(4):
1853 - 1865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Canto and P. Palukaitis
Subcellular distribution of mutant movement proteins of Cucumber mosaic virus fused to green fluorescent proteins
J. Gen. Virol.,
April 1, 2005;
86(4):
1223 - 1228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Gallagher and P. N. Benfey
Not just another hole in the wall: understanding intercellular protein trafficking
Genes & Dev.,
January 15, 2005;
19(2):
189 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Takemoto and A. R. Hardham
The Cytoskeleton as a Regulator and Target of Biotic Interactions in Plants
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2004;
136(4):
3864 - 3876.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Carvalho and S. G. Lazarowitz
Interaction of the Movement Protein NSP and the Arabidopsis Acetyltransferase AtNSI Is Necessary for Cabbage Leaf Curl Geminivirus Infection and Pathogenicity
J. Virol.,
October 15, 2004;
78(20):
11161 - 11171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kawakami, Y. Watanabe, and R. N. Beachy
Tobacco mosaic virus infection spreads cell to cell as intact replication complexes
PNAS,
April 20, 2004;
101(16):
6291 - 6296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|