|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 132:1913-1924 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists PAUSED, a Putative Exportin-t, Acts Pleiotropically in Arabidopsis Development But Is Dispensable for Viability1,[w]Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 (J.L., X.C.)
Exportin-t was first identified in humans as a protein that mediates the export of tRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Mutations in Los1p, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae exportin-t homolog, result in nuclear accumulation of tRNAs. Because no exportin-t mutants have been reported in multicellular organisms, the developmental functions of exportin-t have not been determined. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of two Arabidopsis exportin-t mutants, paused-5 and paused-6. The mutant phenotypes indicate that exportin-t acts pleiotropically in plant development. In particular, paused-5 and paused-6 result in delayed leaf formation during vegetative development. The two paused mutations also cause the transformation of reproductive organs into perianth organs in the hua1-1 hua2-1 background, which is partially defective in reproductive organ identity specification. The floral phenotypes of hua1-1 hua2-1 paused mutants resemble those of mutations in the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS. Moreover, paused-5 enhances the mutant phenotypes of two floral meristem identity genes, LEAFY and APETALA1. The developmental defects caused by paused mutations confirm the important roles of exportin-t in gene expression in multicellular organisms. In addition, a paused null allele, paused-6, is still viable, suggesting the presence of redundant tRNA export pathway(s) in Arabidopsis.
In plants, postembryonic development results from the activities of the apical meristems. The shoot apical meristem (SAM) generates leaves during the vegetative stage of plant development and floral meristems during reproductive development. In Arabidopsis, four types of floral organs, sepal, petal, stamen, and carpel, are produced by a floral meristem in four concentric rings, or whorls. The identities of the four floral organ types are specified by the combinatorial activities of four classes of floral homeotic genes known as A, B, C, and SEPALLATA genes (for review, see Theissen and Saedler, 2001
Several new genes that also act in reproductive organ identity and floral
determinacy specification were identified from two genetic screens in
sensitized backgrounds. In a genetic screen in the ag-4 background,
recessive mutations in HUA1 and HUA2 were found to enhance
the phenotypes of the weak ag-4 allele such that ag-4 hua1-1
hua2-1 flowers resemble severe ag mutants, such as ag-1,
ag-2, or ag-3 (Chen and
Meyerowitz, 1999
Among the newly identified HUA and HEN genes, HUA1,
HUA2, HEN2, and HEN4 appear to promote AG pre-mRNA
processing. Mutations in these genes result in the accumulation of AG
transcripts containing part of the large AG second intron
(Cheng et al., 2003
In this report, we describe two recessive mutations in a locus that we
initially named HUA ENHANCER 5 (HEN5), hen5-1 and
hen5-2, which cause stamen-topetal and carpel-to-sepal transformation
in the hua1-1 hua2-1 background. We show that HEN5 is
identical to PAUSED (PSD), a gene previously identified as a
regulator of developmental phase transitions
(Telfer et al., 1997
PSD encodes the only protein in the Arabidopsis genome with
significant similarity to human exportin-t and yeast Los1p, which are nuclear
export receptors of tRNA (Arts et al.,
1998
PSD Is Required for the Proper Activities of the SAM
We isolated the psd-5 mutation from the hua1-1 hua2-1
mutagenesis screen as a recessive mutation that enhanced the weak hua1-1
hua2-1 loss-of-C-function phenotypes. The psd-5 allele was later
segregated away from the hua1-1 hua2-1 background and was found to
exhibit a vegetative phenotype on its own. While a wild-type SAM continues to
generate leaves on its flanks during vegetative development, leaf formation
was variably delayed in psd-5. In most psd-5 plants, the
leaf-generating activity of the SAM appeared to be compromised such that fewer
leaves were formed than wild type in the same period of time
(Fig. 1, A and B). In
approximately 17% of the plants, no leaf or only one leaf was generated at d
15 after the transfer of the psd-5 seeds to the growth room
(Fig. 1, C and D). At the time
of bolting, there were fewer rosette leaves produced in psd-5 plants
(data not shown). After the cloning of the PSD gene (see below), we
identified another mutant, psd-6, which contained a T-DNA insertion
in the PSD coding region from the Salk T-DNA collection.
psd-6, which was from a different ecotype, exhibited similar
phenotypes as psd-5 (Fig. 1,
EH), although the frequency of plants with no or only 1
leaf at d 15 was only 4%. These vegetative phenotypes were similar to those of
previously described psd mutants
(Telfer et al., 1997
In the hua1-1 hua2-1 background, psd-5 resulted in
stamen-to-petal and carpel-to-sepal transformation in the flower
(Fig. 2, AC), whereas
hua1-1 psd-5 or hua2-1 psd-5 flowers were indistinguishable
from psd-5 flowers, which were largely normal
(Fig. 2G) except for reduced
fertility. hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers had petals in the third whorl
and gynoecia with smaller and irregularly shaped ovary in the fourth whorl
(Fig. 2, B and E). Occasionally
in late-arising flowers, additional flowers appeared in the center
(Fig. 2C), suggesting loss of
floral determinacy. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that valve
epidermal cells throughout hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 ovaries had
epicuticular striations that resembled sepal instead of valve epidermal cells
(Fig. 2, H and I), whereas
cells with sepal characteristics were only found at the apical portion of
hua1-1 hua2-1 valves (Chen et
al., 2002
Another allele, psd-6, was isolated from the Salk T-DNA collection and was in the Col background. psd-6 single-mutant flowers did not display any floral homeotic phenotypes. The psd-6 allele was crossed into hua1-1 hua2-1 (Col), a strain in which the hua1-1 and hua2-1 mutations were introgressed into the Col background to determine if this psd allele also behaved similarly to psd-5. The flowers of hua1-1 hua2-1 (Col) usually had normal stamens (Fig. 2A) and occasionally had petaloid stamens in the third whorl. The hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-6 flowers had petals in the third whorl (Fig. 2D) and gynoecia with elongated gynophores or another flower in the fourth whorl (Fig. 2, E and F). We also crossed psd-6 into hua1-1 hua2-1 in the Ler background and the F2 triple mutants displayed floral phenotypes similar to those of hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 or hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-6 in the Col background (data not shown). Thus, the two psd alleles exhibit similar defects in organ identity and floral determinacy and reveal a requirement for PSD in floral patterning.
To better understand the molecular basis of the psd mutant phenotypes, a map-based cloning approach was used to identify the PSD gene. PSD was mapped to a 27-kb region at the south end of chromosome I on the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) F28P22 (Fig. 3A). Sequencing four genes in this region revealed a single nucleotide deletion in the ninth exon of the gene At1g72560 (Fig. 3A). The deletion of a G is predicted to cause a premature stop codon 11 bp after the mutation site. Therefore, At1g72560 is likely the PSD gene. To confirm this, a 7-kb genomic fragment surrounding the coding region of At1g72560 was amplified by PCR and cloned into the plant expression vector pPZP211. The resulting construct pPZP211-HEN5p3/4 and another unrelated construct pPZP211-35S-GFP were transformed into psd-5 hua2-1 plants. All 30 transgenic plants containing pPZP211-HEN5p3/4 had normal true leaf initiation or appearance (Fig. 1K). In contrast, transgenic plants containing pPZP211-35S-GFP exhibited similar leaf initiation defects to those of psd-5 (Fig. 1L). Thus, At1g72560 complements the psd mutant phenotypes.
To further confirm that At1g72560 is PSD, we obtained a T-DNA insertion line, which we later named psd-6, from the Salk T-DNA collection. We verified that this line had a T-DNA inserted in the first exon of the At1g72560 gene (Fig. 3A). Compared with wild-type Col plants, these plants had a slower rate of leaf appearance, fewer rosette leaves, and lighter colored leaves (Fig. 1, FH), phenotypes also exhibited by psd-5 plants. This T-DNA insertion line was kanamycin sensitive, probably due to silencing of the NPTII gene in the T-DNA. To confirm that the phenotypes observed were due to a T-DNA insertion in PSD rather than another mutation in the background, we crossed this line with psd-5. The F1 plants showed the psd phenotypes, in contrast to the F1 plants that resulted from crosses between Col and Ler plants (Fig. 1, I and J). Therefore, the T-DNA mutant is another psd allele, which we named psd-6. When we introduced this mutation into the hua1-1 hua2-1 (Col) background, the flowers of the resulting triple-mutant plants had phenotypes similar to hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5: petals in the third whorl instead of stamens, gynoecia with elongated gynophores, or another flower in the center (Fig. 2, DF).
A PSD cDNA was isolated by reverse transcription-PCR from
inflorescence tissue. The gene contained 13 exons and 12 introns
(Fig. 3A). The predicted PSD
protein has 988 amino acids and shares 27% identity and 48% similarity to
human exportin-t, and 21% identity and 41% similarity to yeast Los1p
throughout the proteins (Fig.
3B). Human exportin-t shares 19% identity and 41% similarity to
Los1p. Thus, PSD and human exportin-t are more closely related to each other
than either one is to Los1p. All three proteins have a conserved Ran-binding
domain, a signature of the importin-
We examined the expression of a class A gene APETALA1 (AP1), the two class B genes APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), and the class C gene AG in hua1-1 hua2-1 and hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers to begin to understand the molecular basis of the homeotic transformation in hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5. Consistent with the observed stamen-to-petal transformation in the third whorl and carpel-to-sepal transformation in the fourth whorl of hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers, AP1 RNA was present in the inner two whorls (Fig. 4, A and B). Despite the fact that hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers showed loss-of-C function phenotypes, AG RNA was readily detected in the inner two whorls (Fig. 4, C and D). We did not detect any difference in the temporal or spatial patterns of AG expression between hua1-1 hua2-1 and hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 (Fig. 4, C and D, and data not shown). The class B gene PI also showed similar expression patterns in the two genotypes (data not shown). Interestingly, although AP3 RNA was found exclusively in whorls 2 and 3 in hua1-1 hua2-1 flowers (Fig. 4E), AP3 RNA was detected in some cells on the adaxial side of the ovary in hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers (Fig. 4F). This suggests a factor that acts to restrict the expression of AP3 from ovary cells in the fourth whorl is affected by mutations in PSD, a putative exportin-t.
We introduced mutations in the class A, B, or C genes into the hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 background to further determine whether PSD, as a putative exportin-t, specifically affects the class C pathway in flower development. Although the phenotypes of hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 ap2-2, hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 pi-3, or hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 ag-1 flowers indicate that primarily C function is affected in hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers, the hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 ap1-1 combination revealed that psd-5 also affects an earlier step in floral patterning. The finding that psd-5 results in multiple developmental defects in the flower is consistent with the molecular role of PSD as a putative exportin-t.
hua1-1 hua2-1 ap2-2 flowers resemble ap2-2 flowers in the
outer three whorls and hua1-1 hua2-1 flowers in the fourth whorl
(Chen and Meyerowitz, 1999
pi-3 is a week allele with sepals in the outer two whorls and
carpels in the inner two whorls (Bowman et
al., 1991
hua1-1 hua2-1 ag-1 flowers resemble those of ag-1
(Chen and Meyerowitz, 1999
ap1-1 is a severe loss of function mutation in the class A gene
AP1 (Irish and Sussex,
1990
psd mutants had slightly more cauline leaves than wild type (data
not shown), a phenotype that suggests delayed transition of the SAM from
generating shoots to making flowers. To elucidate the possible requirement for
PSD in the process of shoot-to-flower transition, we generated
psd-5 lfy-5 and psd-5 lfy-6 double mutants. LEAFY
(LFY) confers floral meristem identity and transcriptionally
activates various floral homeotic genes
(Weigel et al., 1992
To determine the molecular basis of the floral phenotypes of hua1-1
hua2-1 psd-5 plants, we examined the expression of AG at the RNA
and protein levels. HUA1 and HUA2 are required for the
proper processing of AG pre-mRNA
(Cheng et al., 2003
We also examined AG protein accumulation in wild-type and various psd mutants. AG protein was readily detected in psd-5, psd-6 (Ler), and psd-6 (Fig. 6B), although the levels of AG, relative to PEP carboxylase, may be slightly reduced in the psd single mutants as compared with the wild-type controls. This was largely consistent with the slight reduction of AG mRNA levels in psd single mutants. However, a dramatic difference in AG protein levels was detected between hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 and hua1-1 hua2-1, although the difference at the AG mRNA level was not as great. This suggests that PSD may contribute to AG expression at the translational or posttranslational levels. Because PSD encodes a putative tRNA nuclear export receptor, it is likely that the low level of AG protein in hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 results from defects in AG RNA translation. The fact that the effect of psd mutations on AG protein level is only obvious in the hua1-1 hua2-1 background could be due to the reduced AG RNA level in hua1-1 hua2-1, which may cause AG RNA translation to be more sensitive to global perturbation in protein synthesis.
PSD was expressed in seedlings, leaves, stems, and inflorescences as determined by RNA filter hybridization (Fig. 7). Several forms of PSD RNA were detected. The major one corresponded in size to the full-length mRNA (approximately 3 kb) and constituted more than 75% of total PSD RNA. The molecular nature of the smaller RNA species, which were less abundant, was unclear. They were unlikely degraded PSD RNA from RNA isolation because the same RNA samples did not show degradation of UBQ5 RNA. We also examined the accumulation of PSD RNA in different mutants (Fig. 7). Similar levels of PSD RNA in Ler and hua1-1 hua2-1 were found, suggesting that PSD is not regulated by HUA1 or HUA2. PSD RNA abundance was increased in ag-1 inflorescences (Fig. 7), which may simply be due to the presence of more young floral organs in ag-1 flowers (see below). No PSD RNA species were detected in psd-6 inflorescence (Fig. 7), suggesting that psd-6 is a complete loss-of-function allele and indicating that all the RNA species detected in RNA filter hybridization correspond to PSD RNA. The fact that the psd-6 plants are viable and fertile suggests that there must be other proteins with a similar molecular function. Despite being a potentially more severe allele than psd-5, psd-6 results in less severe vegetative defects compared with psd-5. This is likely due to the presence of genetic modifiers in the two different ecotypes because psd-6 (Ler), which was derived from two backcrosses of psd-6 to Ler, appeared very similar to psd-5 in terms of the vegetative phenotypes.
We examined PSD RNA expression patterns in flowers by in situ hybridization with a probe corresponding to the first exon of the PSD gene. PSD RNA was detected in all four types of young floral organs (Fig. 4, GI and data not shown). Expression in stages one to two floral meristems (Fig. 4H) was also detected, consistent with the role of PSD in floral meristem identity. Expression of PSD RNA was also examined in ag-1 flowers. High levels of PSD RNA were detected in young internal flowers and in the meristems in the center of ag-1 flowers (Fig. 4J). The abundance of young floral organs expressing PSD in ag-1 flowers may explain the increased PSD RNA abundance in ag-1 flowers (Fig. 7).
PSD Is Required in the SAM and Floral Meristems
The hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 flowers have petals in the third whorl and
sepaloid carpels or an internal flower in the fourth whorl, phenotypes that
resemble those of ag mutants. psd-5 single mutants exhibit
occasional sepal cells in the valves of the gynoecium. These phenotypes
suggest that PSD is required for C function in the flower. Unlike
HUA1 and HEN4, which seem to be specific for the class C
pathway in flower development, PSD is required more broadly in flower
development. This is reflected by the fact that AP3 is misexpressed
in hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 but not hua1-1 hua2-1 flowers, and
that psd-5 enhances the floral meristem identity defects of
ap1-1 and lfy mutants. As a putative tRNA export receptor,
it is unlikely that PSD acts directly to specify the identities of the floral
meristem or floral organ primordia. Instead, it is more likely that PSD is
required for the proper expression of genes in the regulatory networks that
specify these identities. The delayed leaf appearance in psd mutants
may reflect a requirement for PSD in cell division and/or
differentiation in the SAM or in the lateral primordia originated from the
SAM. The fact that psd-5 enhances lfy and ap1 in
floral meristem identity defects suggests that PSD is required for
lateral meristems to adopt their proper identities or to develop properly. In
fact, almost all vegetative and floral defects of psd mutants point
to a role for PSD in tissues undergoing cell division and/or
differentiation, such as the SAM, lateral meristems, or organ primordia.
Consistent with this, in transgenic plants containing the uidA gene
driven by the PSD promoter,
The PSD protein is most probably the Arabidopsis ortholog of exportin-t and
Los1p, nuclear receptors of tRNA export in humans and yeast, respectively.
Hunter et al. (C. Hunter et al.,
2003
It is unknown what proteins are responsible for the various psd
phenotypes, as a result of presumably globally reduced protein synthesis in
psd mutants. The psd early seedling phenotypes are similar
to that of pinhead/zwille mutants. PINHEAD
(PNH)/ZWILLE (ZLL) is important for SAM formation and/or
maintenance such that mutations in PNH/ZLL result in seedlings with
terminal leaves (Moussian et al.,
1998
Because tRNA is an essential element required for translation, it would be
expected that efficient tRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is
essential for viability. However, Los1p, a tRNA exportin from yeast
(Hellmuth et al., 1998
Plant Strains and Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis
The strains used in this work are hua1-1, hua2-1,
hua1-1 hua2-1, hua1-1 hua2-1 ap1-1, hua1-1 hua2-1
ap2-2, hua1-1 hua2-1 pi-3, hua1-1 hua2-1 ag-1
(Chen and Meyerowitz, 1999
Ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis was performed as described previously
(Chen et al., 2002
Total RNA was isolated with TRI-REAGENT solutions (Molecular Research
Center, Cincinnatti). Approximately 50 µg of total RNA was loaded for each
sample. RNA blotting and hybridization were carried out according to Li et al.
(2001
In situ hybridization was carried out as described
(Li et al., 2001
Tissue fixation, critical point drying, and image acquisition for SEM were
performed as described previously (Western
et al., 2002
Plant proteins were isolated and resolved in SDS-PAGE as described
(Riechmann et al., 1999
hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5/+ plants were crossed with
hua1-1hua2-1 (Col), and the F2 population segregating the
hua1-1 hua2-1 psd-5 floral phenotype was used as the mapping
population, in which approximately 1,500 triple-mutant plants were identified.
Genomic DNA was isolated as described
(Edwards et al., 1991 Approximately 7 kb of At1g72560 genomic region was amplified with HEN5p3 (5'-cggggtacctgatttgtagtctcatacgtgcgaatatacatt-3') and HEN5p4 (5'-cggggtacccaattgtcaaaagaacaatctgtgtttgg-3'), and was cloned into the pPZP211 binary vector. The plasmid pPZP211-HEN5p3/4, or the control plasmid pPZP211-35S-GFP, was transformed into psd-5 hua2-1 plants by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infiltration method. The T1 transgenic plants were selected on medium containing 50 µg mL1 kanamycin. Reverse transcription-PCR was performed on the total RNA isolated from Ler inflorescence with HEN5p8 (5'-aaaactgcagctaatttgatctggatggtgaaagcga-3') and HEN5p11 (5'-aaaactgcagccatggatgaccttgaacaggcaatagtaatt-3'), which are located in the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions, respectively. The amplified cDNA was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen) and sequenced. The sequence is in GenBank under the accession number AY288073.
A 1.8-kb PSD genomic fragment upstream of ATG was amplified with
HEN5p7 (5'-aaaactgcagtgatttgtagtctcatacgtgcgaatatacatt-3') and
HEN5p9 (5'-aaaactgcagtgtgttaacttaaccccactacaaaaaccc-3'), and was
cloned into a pPZP211-GUS plant expression vector (Wang and X. Chen,
unpublished data). The resulting pPZP211-PSD-GUS plasmid was
transformed into Ler plants. Transgenic plants were selected as
described above. GUS staining was performed as described
(Jefferson et al., 1987
We thank Yulan Cheng for the isolation of psd-5 and for help with the initial mapping of PSD, Dr. Tamara western for introgressing hua1-1 hua2-1 into Columbia, and Jiqun Zhao and Junhong Sun for assistance in the mapping and cloning of PSD. We also thank Drs. Nilgun Tumer, Randall Kerstetter, and Terri Kinzy for valuable suggestions on this work and Drs. Randall Kerstetter, Jun Liu, and Wonkeun Park for helpful comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge Cereon for the release of Ler/Col SNP database and Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory (SIGnAL) and the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) for the isolation and distribution of T-DNA insertion lines. Received March 11, 2003; returned for revision April 24, 2003; accepted May 5, 2003.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.023291.
1 This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (grant no.
1R01GM61146 to X.C.).
[w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. The supplemental
material is available at
http://www.plantphysiol.org. * Corresponding author; e-mail xuemei{at}waksman.rutgers.edu; fax 7324455735.
Arts GJ, Fornerod M, Mattaj IW (1998) Identification of a nuclear export receptor for tRNA. Curr Biol 8: 305314[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Bohnsack TM, Regener K, Schwappach B, Saffrich R, Paraskeva E, Hartmann E, Görlich D (2002) Exp5 exports eEF1A via tRNA from nuclei and synergizes with other transport pathways to confine translation to the cytoplasm. EMBO J 21: 62056215[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bollman KM, Aukerman MJ, Park M-Y, Hunter C, Berardini TZ,
Poethig RS (2003) HASTY, the Arabidopsis
ortholog of exportin 5/MSN5, regulates phase change and morphogenesis.
Development 130:
14931504 Bowman JL, Alvarez J, Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM, Smyth DR (1993) Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development 119: 721743[Abstract]
Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1989) Genes
directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant
Cell 1:
3752 Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1991) Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 120[Abstract]
Brownawell AM, Macara IG (2002) Exportin-5, a
novel karyopherin, mediates nuclear export of double-stranded RNA binding
proteins. J Cell Biol 156:
5364
Busch MA, Bomblies K, Weigel D (1999)
Activation of a floral homeotic gene in Arabidopsis.
Science 285:
585587 Calado A, Treichel N, Müller E, Otto A, Kutay U (2002) Exportin-5-mediated nuclear export of eukaryotic elongation factor 1A and tRNA. EMBO J 21: 62166224[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Chen X, Liu J, Cheng Y, Jia D (2002)
HEN1 functions pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development
and acts in C function in the flower. Development
129:
10851094 Chen X, Meyerowitz EM (1999) HUA1 and HUA2 are two members of the floral homeotic AGAMOUS pathway. Mol Cell 3: 349360[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Cheng Y, Kato N, Wang W, Li J, Chen X (2003) Two RNA binding proteins, HEN4 and HUA1, act in the processing of AGAMOUS pre-mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Cell 4: 5366[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cullen BR (2000) Nuclear RNA export pathways.
Mol Cell Biol 20:
41814187
Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A
simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR
analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19:
1349
Feng W, Hopper AK (2002) A Los1p-independent
pathway for nuclear export of intronless tRNAs in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
99:
54125417
Görlich D, Dabrowski M, Bischoff FR, Kutay U, Bork P,
Hartmann E, Prehn S, Izaurralde E (1997) A novel class
of RanGTP binding proteins. J Cell Biol
138:
6580 Görlich D, Kutay U (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 607660[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Grosshans H, Hurt E, Simos G (2000) An
aminoacylation-dependent nuclear tRNA export pathway in yeast. Genes
Dev 14:
830840 Grosshans H, Simos G, Hurt E (2000) Transport of tRNA out of the nucleus-direct channeling to the ribosome. J Struct Biol 129: 288294[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hellmuth K, Lau DM, Bischoff FR, Kunzler M, Hurt E, Simos G
(1998) Yeast Los1p has properties of an exportin-like
nucleocytoplasmic transport factor for tRNA. Mol Cell Biol
18:
63746386
Hunter C, Aukerman MJ, Sun H, Fokina M, Poethig RS
(2003). PAUSED encodes the Arabidopsis exportin-7
orthologue. Plant Physiol 132:
21352143
Hurt DJ, Wang SS, Li Y, Hopper AK (1987)
Cloning and characterization of LOS1, a Saccharomyces
cerevisiae gene that affects tRNA splicing. Mol Cell Biol
7:
12081216
Irish VF, Sussex IM (1990) Function of the
apetala1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development.
Plant Cell 2:
741753
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS
fusions:
Kandasamy MK, Mckinney EC, Meagher RB (2002)
Functional nonequivalency of actin isovariants in Arabidopsis.
Mol Biol Cell 13:
251261
Kuersten S, Ohno M, Mattaj IW (2001)
Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Ran, Kutay U, Lipowsky G, Izaurralde E, Bischoff FR, Schwarzmaier P, Hartmann E, Gorlich D (1998) Identification of a tRNA-specific nuclear export receptor. Mol Cell 1: 359369[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lamb RS, Hill TA, Tan QK, Irish VF (2002)
Regulation of APETALA3 floral homeotic gene expression by meristem
identity genes. Development 129:
20792086 Lenhard M, Bohnert A, Jürgens G, Laux T (2001) Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 105: 805814[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Li J, Jia D, Chen X (2001) HUA1, a
regulator of stamen and carpel identities in Arabidopsis, codes for a
nuclear RNA binding protein. Plant Cell
13:
22692281 Lohmann JU, Hong RL, Hobe M, Busch MA, Parcy F, Simon R, Weigel D (2001) A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 105: 793803[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Lohmann JU, Weigel D (2002) Building beauty: the genetic control of floral patterning. Dev Cell 2: 135142[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Lynn K, Fernandez A, Aida M, Sedbrook J, Tasaka M, Masson P, Barton MK (1999) The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 126: 469481[Abstract] Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360: 273277[CrossRef][Medline] Mandel MA, Yanofsky MF (1995) A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature 377: 522524[CrossRef][Medline] Mizukami Y, Ma H (1995) Separation of AG function in floral meristem determinacy from that in reproductive organ identity by expressing antisense AG RNA. Plant Mol Biol 28: 767784[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Moussian B, Schoof H, Haecker A, Jurgens G, Laux T (1998) Role of the ZWILLE gene in the regulation of central shoot meristem cell fate during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J 17: 17991809[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Park W, Li J, Song R, Messing J, Chen X (2002) CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 12: 14841495[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Riechmann JL, Ito T, Meyerowitz EM (1999)
Non-AUG initiation of AGAMOUS mRNA translation in Arabidopsis
thaliana. Mol Cell Biol 19:
85058512
Sarkar S, Hopper AK (1998) tRNA nuclear export
in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: in situ hybridization analysis.
Mol Biol Cell 9:
30413055 Telfer A, Bollman KM, Poethig RS (1997) Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124: 645654[Abstract] Theissen G, Saedler H (2001) Floral quartets. Nature 409: 469471[CrossRef][Medline]
Wagner D, Sablowski RW, Meyerowitz EM (1999)
Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY.
Science 285:
582584 Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smyth DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM (1992) LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69: 843859[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Weigel D, Nilsson O (1995) A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377: 495500[CrossRef][Medline]
Western TL, Cheng Y, Liu J, Chen X (2002) HUA
ENHANCER 2, a putative DExH-box RNA helicase, maintains homeotic B and C gene
expression in Arabidopsis. Development
129:
15691581 This article has been cited by other articles:
|