Plant Physiology 132:2240-2247 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists
BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES AND MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES
Expression of 1L-Myoinositol-1-Phosphate Synthase in Organelles1
Kimberly Helms Lackey,
Patricia Marie Pope2 and
Margaret Dean Johnson*
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa,
Alabama 35487
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
We have studied the expression of 1L-myoinositol-1-phosphate
synthase (MIPS; EC 5.5.1.4) in developing organs of Phaseolus
vulgaris to define genetic controls that spatially regulate inositol
phosphate biosynthesis. MIPS, the pivotal biosynthetic enzyme in inositol
metabolism, is the only enzyme known to catalyze the conversion of glucose
6-phosphate to inositol phosphate. It is found in unicellular and
multicellular eukaryotes and has been isolated as a soluble enzyme from both.
Thus, it is widely accepted that inositol phosphate biosynthesis is largely
restricted to the cytosol. Here, we report findings that suggest the enzyme is
also expressed in membrane-bound organelles. Microscopic and biochemical
analyses detected MIPS expression in plasma membranes, plastids, mitochondria,
endoplasmic reticula, nuclei, and cell walls of bean. To address mechanisms by
which the enzyme could be targeted to or through membranes, MIPS genes were
analyzed for sorting signals within primary structures and upstream open
reading frames that we discovered through our sequence analyses. Comprehensive
computer analyses revealed putative transit peptides that are predicted to
target the enzyme to different cellular compartments. Reverse transcriptase
PCR experiments suggest that these putative targeting peptides are expressed
in bean roots and leaves.
Inositol metabolism is essential for the development of plants, animals,
and some microorganisms. Metabolites of inositol (a six carbon cyclitol) such
as phosphoinositides and phytate function as potent regulators of signal
transduction for a wide variety of hormones, growth factors, and
neurotransmitters (York et al.,
1999 ; Loewus and Murthy,
2000 ; Irvine and Schell,
2001 ). Inositol phosphate, the immediate precursor of free
inositol, is synthesized via the internal cyclization of Glc 6-phosphate. The
overall reaction mechanism consists of a tightly coupled oxidation and
reduction (Sherman et al.,
1969 ; Loewus and Loewus,
1983 ). 1L-Myoinositol-1-phosphate synthase (MIPS; EC
5.5.1.4) is the only enzyme known to catalyze this reaction. MIPS is found in
diverse organisms, both eukaryotic and prokaryotic, suggesting that the
pathway for inositol 1-phosphate biosynthesis from Glc 6-phosphate arose early
in the evolution of life (Majumder et al.,
1997 ; Bachhawat and Mande,
2000 ). The properties and generally accepted catalytic mechanisms
of the enzyme are similar in all organisms where such assessment has been
undertaken (Loewus and Murthy,
2000 ). Alignment of MIPS amino acid sequences from diverse
organisms including Arabidopsis, bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Brewer's
yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and Entamoeba histolytica
revealed remarkable evolutionary conservation of the primary structure
(Majumder et al., 1997 ).
Genome sequencing projects have provided additional evidence for this striking
conservation with deduced primary structures from organisms such as
Caenorhabditis elegans, fruitfly (Drosophila melanogaster),
Leishmania major, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Although the essential roles of inositol in many cellular processes
including membrane formation, cell wall biogenesis, stress response, and
signal transduction have been well documented, less is known of the cellular
mechanisms that regulate its complex metabolic flux. To identify spatial and
temporal controls that regulate the biosynthesis of inositol phosphate, we
have isolated and studied MIPS genes and gene products from Arabidopsis and
bean using yeast inositol mutants and yeast MIPS polyclonal antibody
(Johnson, 1994 ;
Johnson and Burk, 1995 ;
Johnson and Sussex, 1995 ;
Wang and Johnson, 1995 ;
Johnson and Wang, 1996 ). Here,
we report microscopic and biochemical findings concerning the
compartmentalization of MIPS (i.e. inositol phosphate biosynthesis) in organs
of bean.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
MIPS Expression during Root Development
MIPS expression was monitored during root development using western-blot
analyses. Isoforms of the enzyme were identified and partially purified from
roots of 8-d-old plants (Fig. 1, A and
B). Three of these forms (80, 56, and 33 kD) were previously shown
to be temporally and spatially regulated during bean
(Johnson and Wang, 1996 ) and
Arabidopsis (Johnson, 1994 ;
Johnson and Sussex, 1995 )
development. In plants and in animals, the existence of multiple isoforms of
particular enzymes often reflects the number of subcellular compartments in
which the same catalytic reaction is required
(Gottlieb, 1982 ). Thus, we
hypothesized that the number of MIPS isoforms detected might reflect the
distribution of the enzyme to other cellular compartments in addition to the
cytosol and chloroplast (Johnson and Wang,
1996 ). To address this hypothesis, we first conducted
immunolocalization studies.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Isoforms of MIPS are differentially expressed during root development. A,
Western-blot analyses of bean root proteins during development detected five
cross-reacting proteins including the 80-, 56-, and 33-kD proteins previously
characterized (Johnson and Wang,
1996 ). Antigen capture immunoassays
(Weiler et al., 1960 ),
ammonium sulfate fractionations, and enzyme assays suggest these proteins are
isoforms of MIPS. Each lane contains total proteins (50 µg). B, MIPS was
partially purified from roots harvested 8 d after germination. Ammonium
sulfate precipitates of 45%, 60%, 70%, and 90% produced 27, 64, 42, and 56
nmol inositol phosphate h-1 mg-1 protein,
respectively.
|
|
Immunolocalization
Immunohistochemical experiments provided valuable overviews of MIPS
expression in cells of bean roots (Fig. 2,
A and B) and leaves (Fig. 2, C
and D). The enzyme is expressed in intracellular structures and in
cell walls (Fig. 2B). In
addition, it is highly expressed in the vascular system of leaves
(Fig. 2D) where many
inositol-containing compounds and other inositol metabolic enzymes have been
identified (Gillaspy et al.,
1995 ).

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical studies profiled MIPS expression in organs of bean.
Sections of 8-d-old bean roots (A and B) and leaves (C and D) were stained
with toluidine blue and incubated with MIPS antibody and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody. Shown are light (A) and confocal
(B) micrographs of a longitudinal section of root and light (C) and confocal
(D) micrographs of leaf section (arrows show vascular system). Root and leaf
light micrographs were magnified 580x and 370x, respectively. Bar
= 20 µm. Magnification of confocal micrographs could not be determined with
the Nikon PCM 2000 microscope. Controls included unstained sections not
treated with primary or secondary antibody to detect autofluorescence and
stained sections incubated only with secondary antibody to detect nonspecific
interactions.
|
|
Immunocytochemistry was used to identity the subcellular structures.
Micrographs of bean roots (Fig. 3, A and
B) detail MIPS expression in plastids, mitochondria, endoplasmic
reticula, plasma membranes, cell walls, nuclei, and nucleoli. The specificity
of these results was verified by counting the number of gold particles present
in each organelle in six samples (grids incubated with primary antibody and
goat anti-rabbit 10-nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody, respectively) and
in six controls (grids incubated with goat anti-rabbit 10-nm gold-conjugated
secondary antibody only; Fig.
3). The difference, as determined by Tukey's honestly significant
difference test (Daniel, 1995 ),
was shown to be significant.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Immunocytochemical analyses identified membrane-bound organelles as
subcellular locations of MIPS. Bean root sections were incubated with MIPS
primary antibody and goat anti-rabbit 10-nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody
and photographed with a Zeiss 10A TEM microscope. Controls were incubated with
goat anti-rabbit 10-nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody only. As shown in A
and B, gold particles are present in plastids (P), mitochondria (M), the
nucleus (N), nucleolus (Nu), endoplasmic reticula (ER), plasma membrane (PM),
and the cell wall (CW). Bar = 1 µm.
|
|
Subcellular Fractionation
To biochemically corroborate the microscopic studies, organelles
(mitochondria, plastids, endoplasmic reticula, plasma membranes, and
chloroplasts) were isolated from roots and leaves and assayed for purity and
enrichment using organelle-specific marker enzymes (Tables
I and
II). MIPS activity as
determined by the end-product method (Chen
and Charalampous, 1966 ) and the rapid colorimetric method
(Barnett et al., 1970 ) was
detected in all isolated organelles. Yeast soluble and insoluble (microsomal)
fractions were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, because
earlier studies indicated that MIPS was found in soluble cellular fractions
(Donahue and Henry, 1981 ;
Johnson and Henry, 1989 ). MIPS
expression was detected in both controls.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. Solubilized purified organelles exhibit MIPS activity
MIPS specific activity was determined in 0.003 mg of organelle protein
using periodate oxidation to measure release of inorganic phosphate from
inositol phosphate. One unit of MIPS is defined as 1 nmol of inositol
phosphate produced per hour. Total activity, Nanomoles of inositol phosphate
produced per hour (units x 10-3). Specific activity,
Nanomoles of inositol phosphate per hour per 0.003 mg of protein (units/mg
x 10-3).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II. Solubilized purified organelles exhibit MIPS activity
To assess organelle purity and enrichment, marker enzymes for endoplasmic
reticula (antimycin insensitive NADH cytochrome C reductase), mitochondria
(cytochrome C oxidase), plastids (nitrite reductase), plasma membranes
(vanadate-sensitive Ca2+ ATPase), and microbodies (catalase) were
assayed using 0.010 mg of protein for each fraction. Contamination between
organelles was estimated by comparing the specific activity (S.A.) of the
marker enzymes in each fraction with the specific activity of the marker
enzyme in its designate organelle.
|
|
Computer Analyses
MIPS has a very highly conserved primary structure and has been isolated
from numerous organisms, yet such a broad distribution was unsuspected, and no
mechanisms for localization to cellular compartments other than cytosol and
chloroplasts have been reported (Majumder
et al., 1997 ). We sought a causal explanation from comprehensive
computer analyses of four genomic copies of MIPS, one from bean and three from
Arabidopsis.
The programs, PSORT (Prediction of Protein Sorting Signals and Localization
Sites in Amino Acid Sequences; Nakai and
Horton, 1999 ) and ExPASy (Expert Protein Analysis System), a
proteomics server of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, provided valuable
information pertaining to sorting signals and common motifs within MIPS
primary structures and upstream open reading frames (ORFs). PSORT analyses
predict that all four MIPS primary structures are type II membrane proteins
with most of the primary structure being associated with cytoplasm
(Table III). A predicted
conserved transmembrane motif (CEDSLLAAPIILDLVLLAELSTR), located approximately
68 amino acids from the carboxy terminus, is also predicted. Database entries
for MIPS, in fact, reveal that this transmembrane motif is not only present,
but is extraordinarily conserved in representatives from both the plant and
animal kingdoms and in organisms as different as Brewer's yeast and human
(Homo sapiens) despite the former presumption that MIPS is a
cytosolic non-membrane-associated enzyme. The genomic sequences immediately
5' of the translation start codons are not conserved in the one bean and
three Arabidopsis MIPS genes examined (Fig.
4, AD). A striking commonality in these upstream regions
is, however, the presence of short ORFs that could potentially encode transit
peptides capable of targeting MIPS isoforms to a variety of subcellular
locations (Table III). The
Phaseolus gene contains upstream ORFs interspersed with consensus RNA splice
sites that predict five such peptides, each with a high probability of
directing the enzyme to a different cellular compartment, including the
nucleus, thylakoid membranes of chloroplast, and microbodies
(Fig. 4A;
Table III). Each Arabidopsis
gene has a distinct set of predicted transit peptides. Chromosome 2 gene has
three such sequences, the first targeting with highest probability to the
microbody, the second to chloroplast (thylakoid membrane, stroma, and
thylakoid space), and the third to the endoplasmic reticulum
(Fig. 4B;
Table III). Chromosome 4 MIPS
gene has one targeting sequence for the nucleus and the microbody
(Fig. 4C;
Table III). Finally, the
chromosome 5 MIPS gene has one such sequence with the most likely target being
the mitochondrial intermembrane space (Fig.
4D; Table III). The
ProfileScan computer program identified N glycosylation, protein
kinase C phosphorylation, casein kinase II phosphorylation, and N
myristoylation as possible posttranslational modifications for MIPS and some
of its putative targeting peptides. Intriguingly, ProfileScan also ascribed a
Wnt motif to bean putative transit peptide number 5
(Table III). Members of the Wnt
family of secreted glycoproteins participate in many signaling events during
development and play permissive roles during cell-fate assignment by
interacting with a number of extracellular and cell-surface proteins
(Arias et al., 1999 ).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Computer analyses predict that MIPS and putative targeting peptides might
localize to organelles identified as sites of inositol phosphate biosynthesis.
Upstream regions of four MIPS genes (AD) were analyzed for splice sites
(nucleotides in bold type), Met residues (amino acids in bold type), stop
codons, and organelle targeting ORFs. Negative numbers represent bases
5' of published start sites (underlined amino acids). This information
was used to generate putative targeting peptides for each gene
(Table III). Bean MIPS is 90%
identical to the Arabidopsis MIPS on chromosome 2, 96% identical to the one on
chromosome 4, and 86% identical to MIPS on chromosome 5. PSORT
(Table III) predicts the
primary structures for all four MIPS can reside in the endoplasmic reticulum,
plasma membrane, chloroplast thylakoid membrane, and mitochondria inner
membrane. In addition, MIPS is predicted to be a type ll membrane protein with
most of its structure associated with the cytosol.
|
|
Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR
To systematically assess expression of the ORFs, the upstream region of the
bean MIPS gene (Fig. 5B) was
used to generate primers for RT-PCR experiments. Four forward primers
(underlined sequence) and a reverse primer from within the MIPS coding
sequence (third exon) were designed to detect appropriately spliced mRNAs that
contain the upstream ORFs (Fig. 5,
BC). Sequencing of a leaf cDNA produced from primer 1
confirmed the existence of an appropriately spliced mRNA capable of producing
peptide number 3 (Table III).
Analysis of other products is currently in progress.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Phaseolus has two MIPS genes. One of two bean MIPS genes was isolated from
a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library, characterized, sequenced, and
used to design primers for RT-PCR experiments. A, Southern-blot analysis of
genomic DNA and BAC DNA digested with restriction enzymes not present in the
gene sequence, EcoRI (E) and Bam Hl (B), detected two hybridizing
fragments (9 and 6 kb) in genomic DNA and one hybridizing fragment (9 kb) in
the BAC DNA. The deduced amino acid sequence of the clone is 89% identical to
the bean root cDNA used as probe for library screening
(Wang and Johnson, 1995 ).
These results suggest that there are two MIPS genes in the bean genome. B,
Bean upstream region contains ORFs interspersed with consensus RNA splice
sites (lowercase bold type) and the first exon (uppercase bold type). C,
RT-PCR reactions were performed using a reverse primer (5'-CCTTGGCCC
TACCCATGGC-3') made from a sequence in the third exon and four different
forward primers (underlined sequence). All lanes were loaded with RT-PCR
reaction products (5 µL) generated from leaf or root mRNA.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
We have used a variety of experimental approaches including microscopic
analyses, organelle isolations, western-blot analyses, and enzyme assays to
question MIPS presence (i.e. inositol phosphate biosynthesis) in
membrane-bound cellular compartments. Although MIPS has only been isolated in
its soluble form, it is clear that other forms exist and that they are
associated with membrane-bound organelles. Given the numerous cellular
compartments and genetic loci for MIPS, it is reasonable to speculate that a
probable function for the enzyme is to help regulate the complex metabolic
flux of inositol. The identification of several new inositol-utilizing
pathways within organelles (York et al.,
1999 ; Irvine and Schell,
2001 ) suggests these pathways may draw from the same inositol
pool, necessitating large quantities of readily available inositol phosphate
that can easily be supplied and regulated at the level of inositol phosphate
biosynthesis, i.e. MIPS. Likewise, a transmembrane orientation for MIPS places
the enzyme in a pivotal position from which to regulate both membrane and
non-membrane-bound aspects of the complex metabolic flux of inositol. It has
been known for some time that MIPS is coordinately regulated with
membrane-bound phospholipid biosynthetic enzymes in Brewer's yeast
(Carmen and Henry, 1999 ) even
though there is no available evidence that suggests that this regulation is
mediated through the physical interaction of MIPS with these enzymes. Others
have also found the expression of MIPS in membrane-bound cellular
compartments. Wong et al.
(1987 ) detected MIPS
expression and activity in the walls of all the vascular elements including
cerebral capillaries of bovine brain, whereas Yoshida et al.
(1999 ) discovered MIPS
transcripts in the scutellum and aleurone layers of rice embryos.
 |
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
On the basis of these and other data
(Lackey et al., 2002 ), we
propose that a complex repertoire of cellular mechanisms functions to
spatially and temporally control inositol phosphate biosynthesis during plant
growth and development. Tagged Arabidopsis MIPS genes will be used to test
this hypothesis and to question the role(s) of MIPS in inositol-signaling
events.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Plant and Yeast Growth Conditions
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds (Taylor's horticultural variety)
were purchased from Asgrow Seed Co. (Kalamazoo, MI) and were grown aseptically
in agar medium containing a Murashige and Skoog salt base without inositol
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis) in an environmental chamber maintained at 24°C
with 16-h photoperiods. Wild-type Brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae) strain SH 477 (Mat a, ura3), was grown at 30°C.
Protein Isolations and Western-Blot Analyses
Soluble plant and yeast proteins were isolated, and protein concentrations
were determined as previously described, respectively
(Johnson and Henry, 1989 ;
Johnson and Wang, 1996 ). MIPS
partial purification included the preparation of crude extracts, streptomycin
sulfate precipitations, and ammonium sulfate fractionations
(Johnson and Wang, 1996 ).
Brewer's yeast polyclonal antibody to MIPS was used for western blotting as
detailed previously (Johnson and Henry,
1989 ; Johnson and Wang,
1996 ).
Microscopic Analyses of Tissues Harvested Eight Days after
Germination
For immunohistochemical studies, bean roots and leaves were fixed, embedded
in paraffin blocks, sectioned on a New World 820 microtome, and stained with
1% (w/v) toluidine blue O (Sigma-Aldrich) to block autofluorescence. After
overnight incubation with MIPS antibody (1:500 dilution), sections were
incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (whole-molecule) fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (1:100 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich),
mounted in Mowiol (Calbiochem, San Diego) and photographed with a confocal
microscope (PCM 2000, Nikon, Tokyo). Controls included unstained sections not
treated with primary or secondary antibody to detect autofluorescence and
stained sections incubated only with secondary antibody to detect nonspecific
interactions.
Bean roots subjected to immunocytochemistry were fixed, embedded in Lowcryl
K4M (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) as described
(Altman et al., 1984 ), and
transferred to capsules for polymerization over a 15-W black-light UV lamp at
a distance of 10 cm for 45 min at 4°C. After sectioning, samples were
placed on 300-mesh formvar coated nickel grids, blocked, incubated (first,
with MIPS primary antibody [1:500 dilution] and then goat anti-rabbit 10-nm
gold-conjugated secondary antibody [1:100 dilution] for 16 h at room
temperature), viewed, and photographed with a microscope (10A TEM, Zeiss,
Jena, Germany). Primary antibody was omitted from control grids to determine
the amount of nonspecific binding by the gold-conjugated secondary
antibody.
Isolation of Organelles from Eight-Day-Old Plants and Enzyme
Assays
Plastids were isolated from roots using two successive Percoll gradients,
rinsed, solubilized, and assayed for purity and enrichment
(Robinson and Barnett, 1988 ).
Chloroplasts were purified from leaves and cotyledons as detailed previously
(Johnson and Wang, 1996 ).
Mitochondria were harvested from green and non-green tissues using the
procedures of Dounce et al.
(1987 ) and Moore and Proudlove
(1987 ), respectively.
Mitochondrial fractions from roots were isolated from two sequential 28% (v/v)
Percoll gradients, whereas fractions from green tissues were subjected to two
successive discontinuous Percoll gradients. Purified mitochondria were washed,
solublized, and assayed for purity and intactness.
Microsomes, endoplasmic reticula, and plasma membranes were collected as
described (Surowy and Sussman,
1986 ). Purified organelles were dialyzed against gradient buffer
and concentrated (concentrator solution, Pierce, Rockford, IL). Yeast
microsomes, a negative control, were extracted
(Carman and Fischl, 1992 ),
washed, and assayed for MIPS expression and activity.
Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) and cytochrome C oxidase (EC 1.9.3.1) activities
were monitored as described (Johnson and
Wang, 1996 ). Antimycin-insensitive NADH cytochrome C reductase (EC
1.6.99.3) activity (Briskin et al.,
1987 ) and nitrite reductase (EC 1.7.7.1) activity
(Wray and Fido, 1989 ) were
assayed spectrophotometrically. Vanadate-sensitive Ca2+ ATPase (EC
3.6.1.38) activity was identified using the procedure of Surowy and Sussman
(1986 ). MIPS (EC 5.5.1.4)
activity was assayed by the end-product method
(Chen and Charalampous, 1966 )
and the rapid colorimetric method (Barnett
et al., 1970 ). D-[1-14C]Glc 6-phosphate
(specific activity 60.3 mCi mmol-1) and
[1,2-3H]myoinositol (specific activity 370740 GBq
mmol-1) were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston). Glc
6-phosphate, bacterial alkaline phosphatase, and phosphate standard were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Isolation of Phaseolus MIPS Genomic Clone and Expression Studies
A bean MIPS cDNA (Wang and Johnson,
1995 ) was used to isolate two genomic clones from an indexed BAC
library. DNA sequencing of one clone, both strands, was performed at the Iowa
State University DNA Sequencing Facility (Ames, IA). Southern-blot analyses
(Sambrook et al., 1989 ) and
RT-PCR (Promega, Madison, WI) were performed according to instructions.
Distribution of Materials
Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be
made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject
to the requisite permission from any third-party owners of all or parts of the
material. Obtaining any permissions will be the responsibility of the
requestor.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We are indebted to Dr. Susan Henry, Dr. Patricia McGraw, Dr. Sally
Mackenzie, and Dr. Janis O'Donnell for yeast strains, antibody, bean BAC
clones, and valuable discussion, respectively.
Received January 19, 2003;
returned for revision February 20, 2003;
accepted February 20, 2003.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no.
MCB9724117 to M.D.J.). 
2 Present address: Department of Plant Biology, The University of California,
Davis, CA 95616. 
*
Corresponding author; e-mail
majohnso{at}bama.ua.edu;
fax 2053481786.
 |
LITERATURE CITED
|
|---|
Altman LG, Schneider BG, Papermaster DS
(1984) Rapid embedding of tissue in lowicryl K4M for
immunoelectron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem
32:
1217-1223[Abstract]
Arias AM, Brown AMC, Brennan K (1999) Wnt
signalling: pathway or network? Curr Gen Dev
9: 447-454
Bachhawat N, Mande SC (2000) Complex evolution
of the inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene among archaea and eubacteria.
Trends Genet 16:
111-113[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Barnett JEG, Brice RE, Corina DL (1970) A
colorimetric determination of inositol monophosphates as an assay for
D-glucose-6-phosphate-1L-myo-inositol-1-phosphate
cyclase. Biochem J 119:
183-186[Medline]
Briskin P, Leonard RT, Hodge TK (1987)
Isolation of plasma membrane: membrane markers and general principles.
Methods Enzymol 148:
542-558
Carman GM, Fischl AS (1992)
Phosphatidylinositol synthase from yeast. Methods Enzymol
209:
305-312[ISI][Medline]
Carmen GM, Henry SA (1999) Phospholipid
biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and
interrelationship with other metabolic processes. Prog Lipid
Res 38:
361-399[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Chen IW, Charalampous FC (1966) Biochemical
studies on inositol: IX. D-inositol 1-phosphate as intermediate in
the biosynthesis of inositol from glucose 6-phosphate, and characteristics of
two reactions in this biosynthesis J Biol Chem
241:
2194-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Daniel W (1995) Tukey's honestly significant
difference (HSD) test. In J Wiley, ed, Biostatistics: A
Foundation for Analysis in the Health Science. John Wiley & Sons,
New York, pp 295-591
Donahue TF, Henry SA (1981) myo-Inositol-1
phosphate synthase. J Biol Chem
256:
7077-7085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Dounce R, Bourguignon J, Brouquisse R, Neuburger M
(1987) Isolation of plant mitochondria: general principles and
criteria of integrity. Methods Enzymol
148:
403-415[ISI]
Gillaspy GE, Keddie JS, Oda K, Gruissem W
(1995) Plant inositol monophosphatase is a lithium-sensitive
enzyme encoded by a multigene family. Plant Cell
7:
2175-2185[Abstract]
Gottlieb LD (1982) Conservation and duplication
of isozymes in plants. Science
216:
373-380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Irvine RF, Schell MJ (2001) Back in the water:
the return of the inositol phosphates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
5: 327-338
Johnson MD, Burk DH (1995) Isozyme of
1L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase from Arabidopsis. Plant
Physiol 109:
721[CrossRef][Medline]
Johnson MD, Sussex LM (1995)
1L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase from Arabidopsis
thaliana. Plant Physiol 107:
613-619[Abstract]
Johnson MD (1994) The Arabidopsis
thaliana myo-inositol phosphate synthase (EC 5.5.1.4). Plant
Physiol 105:
1023-1024[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Johnson MD, Henry SA (1989) Biosynthesis of
inositol in yeast. J Biol Chem
264:
1274-1283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Johnson MD, Wang X (1996) Differentially
expressed forms of 1-L-myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase (EC
5.5.1.4) in Phaseolus vulgaris. J Biol Chem
271:
17215-17218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lackey KH, Pope PM, Johnson MD (2002)
Biosynthesis of inositol phosphate in organelles of Arabidopsis
thaliana. Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists Bull
Biochem Biotechnol 15:
8-15
Loewus FA, Loewus MW (1983) myo-Inositol: its
biosynthesis and metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol
34: 132-161
Loewus FA, Murthy PPN (2000) myo-Inositol
metabolism in plants. Plant Sci
150: 1-19[CrossRef]
Majumder AL, Johnson MD, Henry SA (1997)
1L-myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1348:
245-256[Medline]
Moore AL, Proudlove MO (1987) Isolation of
plant mitochondria: general principles and criteria of integrity.
Methods Enzymol 148:
403-415
Nakai K, Horton P (1999) PSORT: a program for
detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular
localization. Trends Biochem Sci
24: 34-35[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Robinson C, Barnett LK (1988) Isolation and
analysis of chloroplasts. In CH Show, ed, Plant Molecular
Biology: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Washington, DC, pp
67-78
Sambrook JE, Fritsch F, Maniatis T (1989)
Plasmid Vectors. In N Ford, C Nolan, M Ferguson, eds,
Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2, Vol
1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY, p 1.46
Sherman WR, Stewart M, Zinbo M (1969) Mass
spectrometric study on the mechanism of D-glucose 6
phosphate-L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate cyclase. J Biol
Chem 244:
5703-5708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Surowy TS, Sussman MS (1986) Immunological
cross-reactivity and inhibitor sensitivities of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase
from plants and fungi. Biochim Biophys Acta
848: 24-34
Wang X, Johnson MD (1995) An isoform of
1L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase (EC 5.5.1.4) from
Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol
110: 336
Weiler RJ, Hofstra D, Szentivanyi A, Blaisdell R, Talmage DW
(1960) The inhibition of labeled antigen precipitation as a
measure of -globulin. J Immunol
85: 130-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wong YHH, Kalmbach SJ, Hartman BK, Sherman WR
(1987) Immunohistochemical staining and enzyme activity
measurements show myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase to be localized
in the vasculature of brain. J Neurochem
48:
1434-1444[CrossRef][Medline]
Wray JL, Fido RJ (1989) Nitrate reductase and
nitrite reductase. In PJ Lea, ed, Methods in Plant
Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp
241-253
York JD, Odom AR, Murphy R, Ives EB, Wente SR
(1999) A phospholipase C dependent inositol polyphosphate kinase
pathway required for efficient messenger RNA export. Science
285: 96-100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yoshida KT, Wada T, Koyama H, Mizobuchi-Fukuoka R, Naito S
(1999) Temporal and spatial patterns of accumulation of the
transcript of myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase and phytin-containing
particles during seed development in rice. Plant Physiol
119: 65-72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mitsuhashi, M. Kondo, S. Nakaune, M. Ohnishi, M. Hayashi, I. Hara-Nishimura, A. Richardson, H. Fukaki, M. Nishimura, and T. Mimura
Localization of myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase to the endosperm in developing seeds of Arabidopsis
J. Exp. Bot.,
August 1, 2008;
59(11):
3069 - 3076.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. F. M. Abreu and F. J. L. Aragao
Isolation and Characterization of a myo-inositol-1-phosphate Synthase Gene from Yellow Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa) Expressed During Seed Development and Environmental Stress
Ann. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
99(2):
285 - 292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mitsuhashi, M. Ohnishi, Y. Sekiguchi, Y.-U. Kwon, Y.-T. Chang, S.-K. Chung, Y. Inoue, R. J. Reid, H. Yagisawa, and T. Mimura
Phytic Acid Synthesis and Vacuolar Accumulation in Suspension-Cultured Cells of Catharanthus roseus Induced by High Concentration of Inorganic Phosphate and Cations
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2005;
138(3):
1607 - 1614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Majee, S. Maitra, K. G. Dastidar, S. Pattnaik, A. Chatterjee, N. C. Hait, K. P. Das, and A. L. Majumder
A Novel Salt-tolerant L-myo-Inositol-1-phosphate Synthase from Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka, a Halophytic Wild Rice: MOLECULAR CLONING, BACTERIAL OVEREXPRESSION, CHARACTERIZATION, AND FUNCTIONAL INTROGRESSION INTO TOBACCO-CONFERRING SALT TOLERANCE PHENOTYPE
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
28539 - 28552.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|