|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 133:16-20 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists Mycorrhizal Fungi Can Dominate Phosphate Supply to Plants Irrespective of Growth Responses1Centre for Plant Root Symbioses, Soil and Land Systems, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Waite Campus, The University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia 5064 (S.E.S., F.A.S.); and Plant Research Department, Risø National Laboratory, P.O. Box 49, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark (I.J.)
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are vital components of nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, forming mutually beneficial (mutualistic) symbioses with the roots of around 80% of vascular plants and often increasing phosphate (P) uptake and growth. We present novel data showing that AM fungi can provide the dominant route for plant P supply, even when overall growth or P uptake remains unaffected. The results will change our understanding of the roles of AM fungi in agricultural and natural ecosystems; they also predict that mycorrhiza-specific plant P transporters must play a major role in plant P uptake regardless of whether the plants respond to AM colonization by taking up more P per plant or by increased dry weight, compared with nonmycorrhizal (NM) control plants.
AM associations are the outcome of 450 million years of co-evolution, which has led to adaptations in both plants and fungi that underpin their symbiotic development and function. The main physiological basis for mutualism is bidirectional nutrient transfer (Smith and Smith, 1990
In an AM plant, P (as orthophosphate) can be absorbed both directly at the soil-root interface through root epidermis and root hairs and via the "mycorrhizal" pathway via external AM hyphae in soil (Fig. 1). These hyphae absorb P, translocate it rapidly to AM structures within the roots (intercellular hyphae, intracellular coils, and highly branched intracellular arbuscules; for details, see Smith and Read, 1997
We now present results of an experiment carried out in a low-P soil/sand mix to determine the relative contributions of the direct and mycorrhizal uptake pathways in three plant species of varying responsiveness to mycorrhizas when colonized by three AM fungal species. The plants were flax (Linum usitatissimum L. cv Linetta), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Rio-Grande 76R), and medic (Medicago truncatula L. cv Jemalong). The AM fungi Gigaspora rosea Nicolson and Schenck (Banque Européen des Glomales, BEG 9), Glomus intraradices Schenck and Smith (BEG 87), and Glomus caledonium (Nicol. and Gerd.) Trappe and Gerdemann (BEG 20) were grown in pot cultures of Trifolium subterraneum to provide inoculum, because AM fungi are unculturable and must be propagated on host plants. All plant-fungus combinations plus noninoculated, NM plants of each species were grown, to give a total of 12 treatments. A novel compartmented pot system was used to determine the contribution of the mycorrhizal uptake pathway to total plant P uptake (Fig. 2). The experimental plants (two per pot) were grown in compartmented, non-draining pots. The main root + hyphal compartment (RHC) contained 1,100 g of soil/sand mix, with or without incorporated AM inoculum (80 g kg-1) containing colonized roots, spores, and soil. The hyphal compartment (HC) was a small plastic tube containing 25.3 g of the same soil mix (2.3% of the total) without inoculum, capped with 25-µm nylon mesh, which allowed hyphae of AM fungi, but not roots, to penetrate from the RHC and absorb P. The HC was placed horizontally, 5 cm below the soil surface with the mesh toward the center of the pot. The soil for the HCs was well mixed with 33P-labeled orthophosphate of very high specific activity to provide a specific activity of 69.2 kBq mg-1 bicarbonate-extractable P (Olsen et al., 1954
Compared with NM plants without additional P, flax grew better, but to different extents, when colonized by each of the three fungi tested (G. rosea < G. caledonium < G. intraradices; Table I). Medic responded positively to the two Glomus spp. in terms of dry weight production, but showed a small growth depression (lower dry weight) with G. rosea, compared with NM plants. Tomato did not respond positively to any of the fungi (Table I). The changes in growth are presented as mycorrhizal growth dependency (MGD) in Figure 3a. P uptake also varied between the different plant-fungus combinations (Table I), and mycorrhizal P dependencies (MPDs) were similar to MGDs, allowing for small increases in plant P concentrations in some cases (Fig. 3b). All inoculated plants became colonized by AM fungi (Table II), but the variations in growth and in P uptake from the pots as a whole were not directly related to the percentage of root length colonized (compare Tables I and II). There was no colonization in noninoculated (NM) controls.
By supplying 33P in small HCs to which only the fungal hyphae had access (Fig. 2), we demonstrated large differences in the relative contributions of the direct and mycorrhizal pathways of P uptake via different fungi. Specific activities of 33P (kBq mg-1 P) in the different plant-fungus combinations were very variable (Fig. 3c), showing that the mycorrhizal pathway made different contributions to total P uptake. We calculated the contributions of the mycorrhizal pathway to P uptake into the plants; these are directly proportional to the specific activities of 33P. Values slightly higher than the theoretical maximum of 100% (indicated by the horizontal dotted line in Fig. 3c) suggest either that (a) AM fungal hyphal densities were higher in the HCs than RHCs or (b) bicarbonate extraction underestimates the specific activity of 33P available to the hyphae. These uncertainties do not invalidate the conclusion that the quantitative contribution of P transfer via the mycorrhizal pathway was extremely high in five out of the nine individual plant-fungus combinations and was not correlated with percentage of colonization or MPD. The calculations suggest that when G. intraradices was the fungal partner, all of the P was delivered via the mycorrhizal pathway to all three plants (Fig. 3c). Other fungi showed different patterns of P delivery. Flax and medic colonized by G. caledonium also received P exclusively via the mycorrhizal pathway, but in tomato, only approximately 70% was absorbed by this route. G. rosea was a poor symbiont with all three plants and delivered much less P, even to flax, which showed positive growth and P responses to this fungus. Interestingly, although medic did receive approximately 40% of the P from G. rosea, it, like tomato, showed a growth depression compared with NM controls (Fig. 3a). It appears that G. rosea requires relatively high amounts of organic C from the plants.
Our results clearly indicate loss of function of the direct uptake pathway in roots colonized by AM fungi, which can apparently be complete in some AM symbioses. This confirms and extends one previous report (Pearson and Jakobsen, 1993
Confirmation that mycorrhizal uptake can replace direct uptake, even in tomato, which showed no response to AM colonization, compels re-evaluation of estimates of mycorrhizal contributions to P nutrition based on total plant uptake in AM and NM plants (e.g. Smith et al., 1994
Effective genetic manipulation of plant P uptake will depend on identifying which transporters actually operate under field conditions. It follows that the search for mechanisms and genes contributing to plant "P efficiency" should no longer ignore the modifying effects of mycorrhizal symbionts (Zhu et al., 2001
We are, as always, highly indebted to the Fru Olsens (Anette and Anne), Risø National Laboratory, for their excellent and dedicated technical assistance and to our research groups for stimulating discussions. Received March 31, 2003; returned for revision April 29, 2003; accepted May 23, 2003.
1 This work was supported by the Australian Research Council and by the Danish National Research Foundation. This work was carried out at Risø National Laboratory, Denmark. S.E.S. participated as part of the University of Adelaide Overseas Study Program. * Corresponding author; e-mail sally.smith{at}adelaide.edu.au; fax 61-8-83036511.
Burleigh SH, Cavagnaro TR, Jakobsen I (2002) Functional diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizas extends to the expression of plant genes involved in P nutrition. J Exp Bot 53: 1-9 Chiou T-J, Liu H, Harrison MJ (2001) The spatial expression patterns of a phosphate transporter (MtPT1) from Medicago trunculata indicate a role in phosphate transport at the root/soil interface. Plant J 25: 281-295[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Daram P, Brunner S, Persson B, Amrhein N, Bucher M (1998) Functional analysis and cell-specific expression of a phosphate transporter from tomato. Planta 206: 225-233[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Gao L-L, Delp G, Smith SE (2001) Colonization patterns in a mycorrhiza-defective mutant tomato vary with different arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 151: 477-491[CrossRef] Harrison MJ, van Buuren ML (1995) A phosphate transporter from the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme. Nature 378: 626-632[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR, Liu J (2002) A phosphate transporter from Medicago trunculata involved in the acquisition of phosphate released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Cell 14: 1-17 Helgason T, Merryweather JW, Denison J, Wilson P, Young JPW, Fitter AH (2002) Selectivity and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas of co-occuring fungi and plants from a temperate deciduous woodland. J Ecol 90: 371-384[CrossRef] Jakobsen I, Smith SE, Smith FA (2002) Function and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizae in carbon and mineral nutrition. In MGA van der Heijden, IR Sanders, eds, Mycorrhizal Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 75-92 Johnson NC, Pfleger FL, Crookston RK, Simmons SR, Copeland PJ (1991) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas respond to corn and soybean cropping history. New Phytol 117: 657-663 Li X-L, George E, Marschner H (1991) Extension of the phosphorus depletion zone in VA-mycorrhizal white clover in a calcareous soil. Plant Soil 136: 41-48
Liu CM, Muchhal US, Uthappa M, Kononowicz AK, Raghothama KG (1998a) Tomato phosphate transporter genes are differentially regulated in plant tissues by phosphorus. Plant Physiol 116: 91-99 Liu H, Trieu AT, Blaylock LA, Harrison MJ (1998b) Cloning and characterisation of two phosphate transporters from Medicago trunculata roots: regulation in response to phosphate and response to colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 11: 14-22[ISI][Medline] Maldonado-Mendoza IE, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ (2001) A phosphate transporter gene from the extraradical mycelilum of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is regulated in response to phosphate in the environment. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 14: 1140-1148[Medline] McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA (1990) A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115: 495-501[CrossRef] Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for determinsation of phosphate in natural water. Anal Chim Acta 27: 495-501 Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR (1995) Multifunctionality and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 407-411[CrossRef] Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FSD, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Paszkowski U, Kroken S, Roux C, Briggs SP (2002) Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13324-13329 Pearson JN, Jakobsen I (1993) The relative contribution of hyphae and roots to phosphorus uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants measured by dual labelling with 32P and 33P. New Phytol 124: 489-494[CrossRef] Rausch C, Darram P, Brunner S, Jansa J, Laloi M, Leggewie G, Amrhein N, Bucher M (2001) A phosphate transporter expressed in arbuscule-containing cells in potato. Nature (Lond) 414: 462-470[CrossRef][Medline] Read DJ (1998) Plants on the web. Nature 396: 22-23[CrossRef] Rosewarne G, Barker SJ, Smith SE, Smith FA, Schachtman DP (1999) A Lycopersicon esculetum phosphate transporter (LePT1) involved in phosphorus uptake from a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol 144: 507-516[CrossRef] Sanders IR (2002) Specificity in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. In MGA van der Heijden, IR Sanders, eds, Mycorrhizal Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 415-437 Smith FA, Jakobsen I, Smith SE (2000) Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago trunculata. New Phytol 147: 357-366[CrossRef] Smith SE, Smith FA (1990) Structure and function of the interfaces in biotrophic symbioses as they relate to nutrient transport. New Phytol 114: 1-38[CrossRef] Smith SE, Dickson S, Morris C, Smith FA (1994) Transport of phosphate from fungus to plant in VA mycorrhizas: Calculation of the area of symbiotic interface and of fluxes of P from two different fungi to Allium porrum L. New Phytol 127: 93-99 Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, Cambridge Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000) Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, New York van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf- Engel R, Boller T, Weimken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69-72[CrossRef] van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR, editors (2002) Mycorrhizal Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin West HM, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR (1993) Response of Vulpia ciliata ssp ambigua to removal of mycorrhizal infection and to phosphate application under field conditions. J Ecol 81: 351-358 Zhu Y-G, Cavagnaro TR, Smith SE, Dickson S (2001) Backseat driving? Accessing phosphate beyond the rhizosphere-depletion zone. Trends Plant Sci 6: 194-195[Medline] Related articles in Plant Physiol.:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|