|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 9, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.030262 Plant Physiology 133:989-999 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists Reexamining the Role of the Accessory Plasmid pAtC58 in the Virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strain C581Plant Science Institute, Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191046018
Isogenic strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying pTiC58, pAtC58, or both were constructed and assayed semiquantitatively and quantitatively for virulence and vir gene expression to study the effect of the large 542-kb accessory plasmid, pAtC58, on virulence. Earlier studies indicate that the att (attachment) genes of A. tumefaciens are crucial in the ability of this soil phytopathogen to infect susceptible host plants. Mutations in many att genes, notably attR and attD, rendered the strain avirulent. These genes are located on pAtC58. Previous work also has shown that derivatives of the wild-type strain C58 cured of pAtC58 are virulent as determined by qualitative virulence assays and, hence, pAtC58 was described as nonessential for virulence. We show here that the absence of pAtC58 in pTiC58-containing strains results in reduced virulence but that disruption of the attR gene does not result in avirulence or a reduction in virulence. Our studies indicate that pAtC58 has a positive effect on vir gene induction as revealed by immunoblot analysis of Vir proteins and expression of a PvirB::lacZ fusion.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soil phytopathogen that incites tumors on susceptible plants by transferring the T-DNA, a portion of its tumor-inducing plasmid (pTi), into plant cells (Van Larebeke et al., 1974
Chromosomal and Ti plasmid genes are involved in the recognition of a plant environment and activation of the virulence machinery. The Ti-encoded VirA/VirG two-component regulatory system activates vir gene expression in response to the integrated effects of phenols, sugars, and low pH that are found at the plant wound site (Stachel and Zambryski, 1986
A. tumefaciens recognition and attachment to host cells is an early and essential step of the infection process (Lippincott and Lippincott, 1969
Another series of genes proposed to be involved in the attachment process were identified as residing on a 29-kb locus of the A. tumefaciens genome (Matthysse, 1987
The genome of A. tumefaciens strain C58 has four distinct replicons: a circular chromosome, a linear chromosome, and the plasmids pAtC58 and pTiC58 (Van Montagu and Schell, 1979
Surprisingly, the recently published genome sequence of C58 revealed that the att genes described above mapped between bases 130,826 and 159,059 in pAtC58 (Goodner et al., 2001
The reports that mutations in the att genes render strains avirulent are in apparent conflict with reports that pAtC58 is not required for virulence. Because the virulence assays used in earlier studies that demonstrated the nonessentiality of pAtC58 were not quantitative and because the nopaline (NOP) plasmid pTiC58 encodes enzymes for trans-zeatin synthesis by the bacterium at the infection site (Akiyoshi et al., 1985
Construction of Isogenic Strains with Different Combinations of Plasmids
The construction of four isogenic strains carrying different combinations of plasmids was required for these studies (Fig. 1) and is detailed in "Materials and Methods." In brief, strain UIA5 (pSa-C) that lacks pTiC58 and pAtC58 but contains the plasmid pSa-C (Table I) was used as a recipient for pAtC58 in matings with strain A136. MocC (an oxidoreductase) of pSa-C converts mannopine (MOP) to santhopine (Kim et al., 1996a
Two methods were used to examine the virulence of the isogenic strains carrying different combinations of plasmids. The first of these is the K. diagremontiana leaf scratch tumorigenesis assay in which varying concentrations of bacteria are delivered to fresh leaf scratches, and the resultant tumors are examined after a period of 3 weeks (for details, see "Materials and Methods"). As expected, UIA5 and AB150 were avirulent because neither of these strains contains a Ti plasmid (Fig. 3). AB153, which has both pAtC58 and pTiC58, induced tumors at all dilutions of the inciting bacterium. However, AB152, which contains pTiC58 but lacks pAtC58, formed smaller tumors than AB153 in response to high concentrations of inoculum and showed little or no tumor formation at the lowest dilution tested (0.01 OD600). Surprisingly, each of the AB154 isolates (attR disruption) was as virulent as the parent strain AB153.
One potential problem with the tumorigenesis assays described above is that pTiC58 carries the tzs gene. This gene is expressed in response to vir-inducing conditions and results in the secretion of zeatin, an active cytokinin that could play a role in the tumorous phenotype monitored in the K. diagremontiana leaf scratch assay (Akiyoshi et al., 1985
One possible mechanism by which pAtC58 could affect virulence of Ti plasmid-containing strains is through effects on vir gene expression. Therefore, we examined expression levels of several VirB proteins and VirE2 via immunoblot analysis. pTiC58-containing strains AB152 (lacks pAtC58) and AB153 (has pAtC58) expressed the tested VirB proteins and VirE2 under vir-inducing conditions (Fig. 5). However, AB152 expressed very low levels of all the VirB proteins as compared with AB153. Similar results were obtained in analysis of VirE2 expression. This was observed in three independent isolates of AB152 and AB153 (data shown here are for one representative isolate of each). The strain with an attR disruption on pAtC58 and AB154 produced VirB proteins and VirE2 at levels similar to AB153 (Fig. 5). This indicates that a mutation in attR does not affect vir gene regulation. The fact that strains lacking pAtC58 show a remarkable decrease in VirB and VirE2 expression relative to a strain carrying both pTiC58 and pAtC58 suggests that pAtC58 may have a positive effect on vir gene expression.
To explore the hypothesis that pAtC58 may affect transcription of the vir genes, plasmid pSW209, which carries a PvirB::lacZ fusion, was electroporated into strains AB150 (pTi,pAt+), AB152 (pTi+,pAt), and AB153 (pTi+,pAt+), and the resultant strains were tested for
Naturally occurring virulent isolates of A. tumefaciens often carry one or more large "accessory" or "cryptic" plasmids, such as pAtC58, in addition to the Ti plasmid (Schell et al., 1976
The two different virulence assaystumor formation on K. diagremontiana leaves and delivery of plant-expressible nptII from the binary vector pROK2 to tobacco leaf squaresdemonstrated that strain AB152, carrying only pTiC58, exhibits reduced virulence as compared with AB153, which carries both pTiC58 and pAtC58. These results support earlier reports that pAtC58 does not carry genes essential for virulence (Hooykaas et al., 1977
There are several means by which pAtC58 could be involved in the quantitative increase in virulence that is observed. For example, several genes, located throughout the A. tumefaciens genome, have been shown to affect virulence gene expression (Winans, 1991
A second possible role pAtC58 could play in virulence is in the interaction of the inciting bacterium with plant cells at the wound site. Matthysse et al. (1996
A. tumefaciens has a complex genome and it is not surprising that a well-regulated and complex cascade of events that leads to virulence and generation of tumors on susceptible host plants would include all of the genome. The 542.8-kb cryptic plasmid pAtC58 (Allardet-Servent et al., 1993
The results described here are consistent with other reports that important interactions occur between processes encoded for by the Ti plasmid and pAtC58. Gene products encoded by pAtC58 can contribute to opine uptake and catabolism (Kim et al., 1996a
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table I. All cloning was performed using standard protocols, and all enzymes were used as recommended by manufacturers.
Escherichia coli strains used for cloning were grown in Luria-Bertani media (LB) containing the appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains were grown at 25°C in AB minimal media (Chilton et al., 1974 AB buffer for NOP and MOP selection was made without ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), and media were made with washed agar to ensure that these remained the sole carbon and nitrogen sources in the medium. NOP stock was made at a concentration of 25 mg mL1 in 10% (w/v) glacial acetic acid and bitter sterlized using a 0.22 µM filler. For MOP stock, MOP was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH), and a 100 mM stock in distilled water was filter sterilized and stored at 20°C. For AS stock, millimolar stocks were made fresh in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to induction medium as necessary at the appropriate concentration. For A. tumefaciens, x-gal was used at a concentration of 50 µg mL1 in AB minimal media plates. For E. coli, x-gal was used at 50 µg mL1 in conjunction with isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (50 µg mL1).
UIA5-pSaC was used as a recipient to select for an unmarked pAtC58 from donor strain A136 using MOP selection (Kim et al., 1996a
For colony PCRs, a medium-sized colony was resuspended in 50-µL sterile PCR-grade water. A 10-µL aliquot of 10x PCR buffer was added along with 1 µL of lysozyme (120 µg mL1) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. After adding 1 µL of Proteinase K (12 mg mL1), the sample was incubated at 60°C for 5 min and then at 110°C for 5 min. A pulse spin brought down cell debris, and 2.5 µL of this sample was used for subsequent amplifications (final reaction volume of 20 µL). pTiC58 was purified using the method of Hayman and Farrand (1990
Strains were inoculated into 3 mL of MG/L and grown overnight at 25°C to an OD600 of approximately 1.0. A 1-mL aliquot of these cells was spun down and washed six times in sterile distilled water and one time in 10% (w/v) glycerol. The pellet was resuspended in 50 µL of 10% (w/v) glycerol and used for electroporation.
Electroporation of pTiC58 into UIA5 and AB150 and Selection of Transformants
Electroporation of Plasmids into E. coli
A 659-bp internal fragment of the attR was amplified using PCR primers as listed in Table II and cloned into pGEM T-Easy (Promega) to yield pGN7. pGN7 was digested with EcoRI to remove the insert, and the EcoRI fragment was cloned into the EcoR I site of pVIK112 (Kalogeraki and Winans, 1997
Kalanchoë diagremontiana Virulence Assay (Liu et al., 2001
Tobacco (Nicotinia tabacum) Virulence Assays Using Binary Vector pROK2 (Baulcombe et al., 1986
Immunoblot Analysis for vir Gene Expression
vir Gene Induction Assay
Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject to the requisite permission from any third party owners of all or parts of the material. Obtaining any permissions will be the responsibility of the requestor.
Special thanks to Dr. Stephen K. Farrand (University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign) for his gift of strains UIA5-pSaC, GMI9017, and C58, and, in particular, for his suggestions regarding the use of pSaC and MOP in selection for pAtC58 in the transconjugants. We also wish to thank Steve C. Winans (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) for pVIK112, Christian Baron (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) for C58 specific VirB1 and VirE2 antibodies, and Clay Fuqua (Indiana University, Bloomington) for E. coli S17-1/ pir. We specially acknowledge the invaluable guidance from Dr. Arlene Wise (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) for the vir induction assays. We are grateful to Dr. Colleen McCullen (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) for comments, suggestions, and early readings of the manuscript. Special thanks to Shaunak J. Patel (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA), an undergraduate in the lab, for assistance on the project. We wish to thank Dr. Ann G. Matthysse (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) for sending us A205 and B123. Received July 15, 2003; returned for revision August 7, 2003; accepted August 22, 2003.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.030262.
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. MCB9817149 and NIH RO1 GM47369). * Corresponding author; e-mail abinns{at}sas.upenn.edu; fax 2158988780.
Akiyoshi DE, Regier DA, Gordon MP (1987) Cytokinin production by Agrobacterium and Pseudomonas spp. J Bacteriol 169: 42424248
Akiyoshi DE, Regier DA, Jen G, Gordon MP (1985) Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the tzs gene from Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain T37. Nucleic Acids Res 13: 27732788
Allardet-Servent A, Michaux-Charachon S, Jumas-Bilak E, Karayan L, Ramuz M (1993) Presence of one linear and one circular chromosome in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 genome. J Bacteriol 175: 78697874
Baek CH, Farrand SK, Lee KE, Park DK, Lee JK, Kim KS (2003) Convergent evolution of Amadori opine catabolic systems in plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 185: 513524
Banta LM, Joerger RD, Howitz VR, Campbell AM, Binns AN (1994) Glu-255 outside the predicted ChvE binding site in VirA is crucial for sugar enhancement of acetosyringone perception by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 176: 32423249 Bash R, Matthysse AG (2002) Attachment to roots and virulence of a chvB mutant of Agrobacterium tumefaciens are temperature sensitive. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15: 160163[Medline] Baulcombe DC, Saunders GR, Bevan MW, Mayo MA, Harrison BD (1986) Expression of biologically-active viral satellite RNA from the nuclear genome of transformed plants. Nature 321: 446449[CrossRef]
Beaupre CE, Bohne J, Dale EM, Binns AN (1997) Interactions between VirB9 and VirB10 membrane proteins involved in movement of DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plant cells. J Bacteriol 179: 7889
Berger BR, Christie PJ (1994) Genetic complementation analysis of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virB operon: virB2 through virB11 are essential virulence genes. J Bacteriol 176: 36463660
Binns AN, Beaupre CE, Dale EM (1995) Inhibition of VirB-mediated transfer of diverse substrates from Agrobacterium tumefaciens by the IncQ plasmid RSF1010. J Bacteriol 177: 48904899
Cangelosi GA, Ankenbauer RG, Nester EW (1990) Sugars induce the Agrobacterium virulence genes through a periplasmic binding protein and a transmembrane signal protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 67086712 Cangelosi GA, Best EA, Martinetti G, Nester EW (1991) Genetic analysis of Agrobacterium. Methods Enzymol 204: 384397[Web of Science][Medline]
Cangelosi GA, Hung L, Puvanesarajah V, Stacey G, Ozga DA, Leigh JA, Nester EW (1987) Common loci for Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium meliloti exopolysaccharide synthesis and their roles in plant interactions. J Bacteriol 169: 20862091
Cangelosi GA, Martinetti G, Leigh JA, Lee CC, Theines C, Nester EW (1989) Role for Agrobacterium tumefaciens ChvA protein in export of beta-1,2-glucan. J Bacteriol 171: 16091615
Carlier A, Uroz S, Smadja B, Fray R, Latour X, Dessaux Y, Faure D (2003) The Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens harbors an attM-paralogous gene, aiiB, also encoding N-Acyl homoserine lactonase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 49894993 Casse F, Boucher C, Julliot JS, Michel M, Denarie J (1979) Identification and characterization of large plasmids in Rhizobium meliloti using agarose gel electrophoresis. J Gen Microbiol 54: 229240
Chen L, Chen Y, Wood DW, Nester EW (2002) A new type IV secretion system promotes conjugal transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 184: 48384845
Chilton MD, Currier TC, Farrand SK, Bendich AJ, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1974) Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA and PS8 bacteriophage DNA not detected in crown gall tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 36723676, 1974 Christie PJ (2001) Type IV secretion: intercellular transfer of macromolecules by systems ancestrally related to conjugation machines. Mol Microbiol 40: 294305[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
de Iannino NI, Ugalde RA (1989) Biochemical characterization of avirulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens chvA mutants: synthesis and excretion of beta-(12)glucan. J Bacteriol 171: 28422849 den Dulk-Ras A, Hooykaas PJ (1995) Electroporation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Methods Mol Biol 55: 6372[Medline] Dessaux Y, Petit A, Farrand SK, Murphy PJ (1998) Opine and opine-like molecules involved in plant-Rhizobiaceae interactions. In HP Spaink, A Kondorosi, PJJ Hooykaas, eds, The Rhizobiaceae: Molecular Biology of Model Plant-Associated Bacteria. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 173197
Doty SL, Chang M, Nester EW (1993) The chromosomal virulence gene, chvE, of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is regulated by a LysR family member. J Bacteriol 175: 78807886
Doty SL, Yu MC, Lundin JI, Heath JD, Nester EW (1996) Mutational analysis of the input domain of the VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 178: 961970
Douglas C, Halperin W, Gordon M, Nester E (1985a) Specific attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to bamboo cells in suspension cultures. J Bacteriol 161: 764766
Douglas CJ, Staneloni RJ, Rubin RA, Nester EW (1985b) Identification and genetic analysis of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens chromosomal virulence region. J Bacteriol 161: 850860 Garfinkel DJ, Simpson RB, Ream LW, White FF, Gordon MD, Nester EW (1981) Genetic analysis of crown gall: fine structure map of the T-DNA by site-directed mutagenesis. Cell 27: 4353
Gelvin SB (2003) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the "gene-jockeying" tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67: 1637
Goodner B, Hinkle G, Gattung S, Miller N, Blanchard M, Qurollo B, Goldman BS, Cao Y, Askenazi M, Halling C et al. (2001) Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 294: 23232328 Hayman GT, Farrand SK (1990) Agrobacterium plasmids encode structurally and functionally different loci for catabolism of agrocinopine-type opines. Mol Gen Genet 223: 465473[Web of Science][Medline] Hooykaas PJJ, Klapwijk PM, Nuti MP, Schilperoort RA, Rorsch A (1977) Transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid to avirulent agrobacteria and to explanta. J Gen Microbiol 98: 477484
Huang ML, Cangelosi GA, Halperin W, Nester EW (1990) A chromosomal Agrobacterium tumefaciens gene required for effective plant signal transduction. J Bacteriol 172: 18141822
Hwang I, Li PL, Zhang L, Piper KR, Cook DM, Tate ME, Farrand SK (1994) TraI, a LuxI homologue, is responsible for production of conjugation factor, the Ti plasmid N-acylhomoserine lactone autoinducer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 46394643 Hynes MF, Simon R, Puhler A (1985) The development of plasmid-free strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by using incompatibility with a Rhizobium meliloti plasmid to eliminate pAtC58. Plasmid 13: 99105[CrossRef][Medline]
Jumas-Bilak E, Maugard C, Michaux-Charachon S, Allardet-Servent A, Perrin A, O'Callaghan D, Ramuz M (1995) Study of the organization of the genomes of Escherichia coli, Brucella melitensis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens by insertion of a unique restriction site. Microbiology 141: 24252432
Jumas-Bilak E, Michaux-Charachon S, Bourg G, Ramuz M, Allardet-Servent A (1998) Unconventional genomic organization in the alpha subgroup of the Proteobacteria. J Bacteriol 180: 27492755 Kado C, ed (1998) Agrobacterium-Mediated Horizontal Gene Transfer, Vol 20. Plenum Press, New York Kalogeraki VS, Winans SC (1997) Suicide plasmids containing promoterless reporter genes can simultaneously disrupt and create fusions to target genes of diverse bacteria. Gene 188: 6975[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim KS, Chilton WS, Farrand SK (1996a) A Ti plasmid-encoded enzyme required for degradation of mannopine is functionally homologous to the T-region-encoded enzyme required for synthesis of this opine in crown gall tumors. J Bacteriol 178: 32853292 Krall L, Raschke M, Zenk MH, Baron C (2002) The Tzs protein from Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 produces zeatin riboside 5'-phosphate from 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl diphosphate and AMP. FEBS Lett 527: 315318[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lee YW, Jin S, Sim WS, Nester EW (1995) Genetic evidence for direct sensing of phenolic compounds by the VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1224512249
Li L, Jia Y, Hou Q, Charles TC, Nester EW, Pan SQ (2002) A global pH sensor: Agrobacterium sensor protein ChvG regulates acid-inducible genes on its two chromosomes and Ti plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1236912374
Li PL, Hwang I, Miyagi H, True H, Farrand SK (1999) Essential components of the Ti plasmid trb system, a type IV macromolecular transporter. J Bacteriol 181: 50335041
Lippincott BB, Lippincott JA (1969) Bacterial attachment to a specific wound site as an essential stage in tumor initiation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 97: 620628
Liu Z, Jacobs M, Schaff DA, McCullen CA, Binns AN (2001) ChvD, a chromosomally encoded ATP-binding cassette transporter-homologous protein involved in regulation of virulence gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 183: 33103317
Mantis NJ, Winans SC (1993) The chromosomal response regulatory gene chvI of Agrobacterium tumefaciens complements an Escherichia coli phoB mutation and is required for virulence. J Bacteriol 175: 66266636
Matthysse AG (1983) Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. J Bacteriol 154: 906915
Matthysse AG (1987) Characterization of nonattaching mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 169: 313323 Matthysse AG (1994) Conditioned medium promotes the attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain NT1 to carrot cells. Protoplasma 183: 131136[CrossRef]
Matthysse AG, McMahan S (1998) Root colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens is reduced in cel, attB, attD, and attR mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 23412345
Matthysse AG, McMahan S (2001) The effect of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens attR mutation on attachment and root colonization differs between legumes and other dicots. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 10701075
Matthysse AG, White S, Lightfoot R (1995) Genes required for cellulose synthesis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 177: 10691075 Matthysse AG, Yarnall H, Boles SB, McMahan S (2000) A region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens chromosome containing genes required for virulence and attachment to host cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1490: 208212[Medline]
Matthysse AG, Yarnall HA, Young N (1996) Requirement for genes with homology to ABC transport systems for attachment and virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 178: 53025308 Miller JH (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Neff NT, Binns AN (1985) Agrobacterium tumefaciens interaction with suspension-cultured tomato cells. Plant Physiol 77: 3542 Ogawa Y, Ishikawa K, Mii M (2000) Highly tumorigenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain from crown gall tumors of chrysanthemum. Arch Microbiol 173: 311315[Medline] Ogawa Y, Mii M (2001) Ti- and cryptic-plasmid-borne virulence of wild-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain CNI5 isolated from chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev). Arch Microbiol 176: 315322[Medline] Pappas KM, Winans SC (2003) A LuxR-type regulator from Agrobacterium tumefaciens elevates Ti plasmid copy number by activating transcription of plasmid replication genes. Mol Microbiol 48: 10591073[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Peng WT, Lee YW, Nester EW (1998) The phenolic recognition profiles of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirA protein are broadened by a high level of the sugar binding protein ChvE. J Bacteriol 180: 56325638 Powell GK, Hommes NG, Kuo J, Castle LA, Morris RO (1988) Inducible expression of cytokinin biosynthesis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens by plant phenolics. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1: 235242[Medline]
Reuhs BL, Kim JS, Matthysse AG (1997) Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to carrot cells and Arabidopsis wound sites is correlated with the presence of a cell-associated, acidic polysaccharide. J Bacteriol 179: 53725379 Rosenberg C, Huguet T (1984) The pAtC58 plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is not essential for tumour induction. Mol Gen Genet 196: 533536[CrossRef][Web of Science] Schell J, Van Montagu M, Depicker A, De Waele D, Engler G, Genetello C, Van der Elsacker S, van Larebeke N, Zaenen I (1976) Agrobacterium tumefaciens: What Segment of the Plasmid Is Responsible for the Induction of Crown Gall Tumors? Plenum, New York
Shimoda N, Toyoda-Yamamoto A, Aoki S, Machida Y (1993) Genetic evidence for an interaction between the VirA sensor protein and the ChvE sugar-binding protein of Agrobacterium. J Biol Chem 268: 2655226558
Shimoda N, Toyoda-Yamamoto A, Nagamine J, Usami S, Katayama M, Sakagami Y, Machida Y (1990) Control of expression of Agrobacterium vir genes by synergistic actions of phenolic signal molecules and monosaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 66846688 Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A (1983) A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: Transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1: 784791[CrossRef] Stachel SE, Nester EW (1986) The genetic and transcriptional organization of the vir region of the A6 Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. EMBO J 5: 14451454[Web of Science][Medline] Stachel SE, Zambryski PC (1986) VirA and VirG control the plant-induced activation of the T-DNA transfer process of A. tumefaciens. Cell 46: 325333[Web of Science][Medline]
Thomashow MF, Karlinsey JE, Marks JR, Hurlbert RE (1987) Identification of a new virulence locus in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that affects polysaccharide composition and plant cell attachment. J Bacteriol 169: 32093216 Turk SC, Melchers LS, den Dulk-Ras H, Regensburg-Tuink AJ, Hooykaas PJ (1991) Environmental conditions differentially affect vir gene induction in different Agrobacterium strains: role of the VirA sensor protein. Plant Mol Biol 16: 10511059[CrossRef][Medline] Tzfira T, Citovsky V (2002) Partners-in-infection: host proteins involved in the transformation of plant cells by Agrobacterium. Trends Cell Biol 12: 121129[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Uttaro AD, Cangelosi GA, Geremia RA, Nester EW, Ugalde RA (1990) Biochemical characterization of avirulent exoC mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 172: 16401646 Van Larebeke N, Engler G, Holsters M, Van den Elsacker S, Zaenen I, Schilperoort RA, Schell J (1974) Large plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens essential for crown gall-inducing ability. Nature 252: 169170[CrossRef][Medline] Van Montagu M, Schell J, eds (1979) The Plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam Vaudequin-Dransart V, Petit A, Poncet C, Ponsonnet C, Nesme X, Jones JB, Bouzar H, Chilton WS, Dessaux Y (1995) Novel Ti plasmids in Agrobacterium strains isolated from fig tree and chrysanthemum tumors and their opinelike molecules. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 8: 311321[Medline] Veselov D, Langhans M, Hartung W, Aloni R, Feussner I, Gotz C, Veselova S, Schlomski S, Dickler C, Bachmann K et al. (2003) Development of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58-induced plant tumors and impact on host shoots are controlled by a cascade of jasmonic acid, auxin, cytokinin, ethylene and abscisic acid. Planta 216: 512522[Web of Science][Medline]
von Bodman SB, McCutchan JE, Farrand SK (1989) Characterization of conjugal transfer functions of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid pTiC58. J Bacteriol 171: 52815289 Winans SC (1991) An Agrobacterium two-component regulatory system for the detection of chemicals released from plant wounds. Mol Microbiol 5: 23452350[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Winans SC (1992) Two-way chemical signaling in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. Microbiol Rev 56: 1231
Winans SC, Kerstetter RA, Nester EW (1988) Transcriptional regulation of the virA and virG genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 170: 40474054
Winans SC, Kerstetter RA, Ward JE, Nester EW (1989) A protein required for transcriptional regulation of Agrobacterium virulence genes spans the cytoplasmic membrane. J Bacteriol 171: 16161622 Winans SC, Mantis NJ, Chen CY, Chang CH, Han DC (1994) Host recognition by the VirA, VirG two-component regulatory proteins of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Res Microbiol 145: 461473[Medline]
Wood DW, Setubal JC, Kaul R, Monks DE, Kitajima JP, Okura VK, Zhou Y, Chen L, Wood GE, Almeida NF Jr et al. (2001) The genome of the natural genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 294: 23172323
Zhu J, Oger PM, Schrammeijer B, Hooykaas PJ, Farrand SK, Winans SC (2000) The bases of crown gall tumorigenesis. J Bacteriol 182: 38853895 Zorreguieta A, Geremia RA, Cavaignac S, Cangelosi GA, Nester EW, Ugalde RA (1988) Identification of the product of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens chromosomal virulence gene. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1: 121127[Medline] Zupan J, Muth TR, Draper O, Zambryski P (2000) The transfer of DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plants: a feast of fundamental insights. Plant J 23: 1128[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|