|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 134:129-136 (2004) © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Phosphatidic Acid Induces Leaf Cell Death in Arabidopsis by Activating the Rho-Related Small G Protein GTPase-Mediated Pathway of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation1Division of Molecular Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 790-784, Korea (J.P., Yu.L., Yo.L.); and Center for Plant Cell Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0124 (Y.G., Z.Y.)
Phosphatidic acid (PA) level increases during various stress conditions. However, the physiological roles of this lipid in stress response remain largely unknown. In this study, we report that PA induced leaf cell death and elevated the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the whole leaf and single cells. To further elucidate the mechanism of PA-induced cell death, we then examined whether Rho-related small G protein (ROP) 2, which enhanced ROS production in an in vitro assay, is involved in PA-induced ROS production and cell death. In response to PA, transgenic leaves of Arabidopsis expressing a constitutively active rop2 mutant exhibited earlier cell death and higher levels of ROS than wild type (WT), whereas those expressing a dominant-negative rop2 mutant exhibited later cell death and lower ROS. However, in the absence of exogenous PA, no spontaneous cell death or elevated ROS was observed in constitutively active rop2 plants, suggesting that the activation of ROP GTPase alone is insufficient to activate the ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway. These results suggest that PA modulates an additional factor required for the active ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway. Therefore, PA may be an important regulator of ROP-regulated ROS generation and the cell death process during various stress and defense responses of plants.
Phosphatidic acid (PA) is implicated in numerous stress responses of plants. Intracellular PA levels increase under various biotic and abiotic stress conditions, including pathogen elicitation (Young et al., 1996
PA has many regulatory functions in animal cells, including the regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, protein kinase, phosphatase, lipid kinase, phospholipases, intracellular Ca2+ levels, vesicle trafficking, cell proliferation, and cytoskeletal rearrangement (Liscovitch et al., 2000
A potential mechanism of PA action in plant stress responses is the activation of an NADPH oxidase that produces ROS, similar to the system in neutrophils (Regier et al., 1999
Although the detailed mechanism for the regulation of plant NADPH oxidases is possibly different from that in animal ones, one common activator of ROS generation in both systems is small G protein. Plants contain a family of Rac-like GTPases, named ROPs (Rho-related small G proteins in plants) that may be functional homologs of the neutrophil Rac GTPases in the activation of the plasma membrane NADPH oxidases (Kawasaki et al., 1999 Here, we examine the physiological roles of PA in cell death, and the mechanism of PA activation of ROS generation. We demonstrate that PA induces cell death in leaves via up-regulation of the ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway. These data, together with the fact that PA levels are elevated during a number of stress conditions, suggest that PA plays an important role in inducing cell death during stress responses in plants.
PA Induces Death in Arabidopsis Leaf Tissue In response to important stress factors, such as pathogen infection or wounding, plant tissues often display regulated cell death. To investigate whether the rise in PA levels during these stress conditions is related to cell death, liposome preparations of PA were infiltrated into Arabidopsis rosette leaves using the pressure of a syringe without a needle. The area of leaves infiltrated with 20 µL of 500 µM dipalmitoyl (di16:0)-PA lost turgor pressure at 1 h after treatment, and displayed loss of chlorophyll and a blighted appearance after 10 to 12 h. In contrast, no evident changes were detected in di16:0-phosphatidylcholine (PC)-treated leaves (Fig. 1A). We then evaluated the influence of fatty acyl tails of PA on leaf cell death. When infiltrated into the leaves, dioleoyl (di18:1)-PA also induced cell death in Arabidopsis leaves, although the lesions were smaller than those generated by di16:0-PA (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the cell death induced by di16:0-PA is not likely to be a specific effect of di16:0-PA but rather a general effect of PA.
To test the PA concentration dependence of the response, 20 µL of PA at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1,000 µM was infiltrated into the leaves. The cell death response was apparent at PA concentrations as low as 400 µM, and at higher concentrations of PA tested, up to 1 mM, the area of cell death increased (Fig. 1C). PA-induced cell death also appeared when the leaves were floated on 500 µM lipid suspensions. Leaves floating on a PA solution showed a loss of turgor and chlorosis throughout the entire area after 24 h (Fig. 1D, PA). Cells in the area of turgor loss stained positive with Trypan blue, indicating cell death (Fig. 1E, left). PC-treated leaf cells did not stain with Trypan blue (Fig. 1E, right). To determine whether PA-induced cell death is a PA-specific effect, we treated detached leaves with many other phospholipids (PC, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, and phosphatidyl-Ser) and two types of detergents (Triton X-100 and Tween 20) at the same molar concentration as PA. In contrast to PA-treated leaves that completely lost their turgor pressure and displayed chlorosis, no visible changes were observed in leaves treated with other phospholipids or detergents until 24 h after treatment (Fig. 1D). In addition, metabolites of PA, including lysophosphatidic acid, diacylglycerol, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and myristic acid, did not induce any noticeable changes in the leaves up to 24 h when the experiment was terminated (data not shown). Our results indicate that the observed cell death is not a detergent effect, nor can it be induced by metabolic products of PA or other phospholipids, but it is specifically triggered by PA.
Cell death during defense responses of plants often involves ROS production (Lamb and Dixon, 1997
We additionally investigated ROS generation in intact Arabidopsis leaves. In this assay, the detached leaves were preincubated with diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 5 h, and treated with suspensions of PA or PC. Deep-brown DAB polymer products were detectable only in PA-treated leaves (Fig. 2C). The results collectively confirm that PA promotes ROS production in Arabidopsis plants.
Although specific ROP family members activate ROS generation in rice and cotton fibers (Kawasaki et al., 1999
A possible involvement of the ROP2 small G protein in PA-induced cell death was examined by floating rosette leaves of rop2 transgenic plants on a PA suspension. We used heterozygous plants of constitutively active rop2 (CA-rop2) and dominant-negative rop2 (DN-rop2) transformants, because heterozygous plants show only mild alterations in leaf shape (Fig. 4A, top) when compared with WT, unlike homozygous plants (Li et al., 2001
WT and rop2 transgenic plants display different morphology. Leaves of heterozygous CA-rop2 transgenic plants are slender, thicker, and twisted at the edge, whereas those of heterozygous DN-rop2 transgenic plants are ruffled and thinner than WT. The possibility that the differences in leaf morphology lead to varying amounts of PA absorption and thus different response times was tested by comparing phospholipid absorption among transgenic plants using [glycerol-U-14C]PA. No significant differences were observed in the amount of [14C]PA absorbed among transgenic lines (data not shown), ruling out the possibility that the variable rates of PA-induced necrosis among the rop2 transgenic lines are caused by distinct lipid absorbing rates.
We investigated whether the different responses of rop2 transgenic plants to PA were caused by their difference in ROS generation and/or accumulation. H2O2 production in guard cells of rop2 transgenic plants was assayed, as described for Figure 2. Before PA treatment, fluorescence levels in guard cells of the CA-rop2, WT, and DN-rop2 plants were similar (Fig. 5A; P > 0.05). After treatment with PA, fluorescence emission from guard cells of CA-rop2, WT, and DN-rop2 plants increased to 217%, 168%, and 150% of control levels, respectively (Fig. 5A). Compared with WT plants, the change in ROS levels was significantly higher and lower for CA-rop2 (P < 0.01) and DN-rop2 (P < 0.01) plants, respectively. PC did not stimulate ROS production in any rop2 transgenic plants (data not shown). Similar results were obtained in the assay using whole leaf. CA leaves exhibited more intense deposition of brown DAB polymers than WT or DN-rop2 leaves in response to PA treatment (Fig. 5B). These results support that PA activates the ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway, resulting in leaf cell death.
In this study, we examined the effect of PA at the whole-leaf and single-cell levels to elucidate its physiological role and mechanism of action. The lipid induces ROS and cell death in Arabidopsis leaves and generates ROS at the single-cell level (Figs. 1 and 2). We suggest that these responses involve ROP2-mediated ROS-generating machinery, based on the finding that rop2 transgenic plants display distinct responses to PA (Figs. 4 and 5). However, an activation of ROP small G protein alone is not sufficient to induce ROS production and cell death, because activated ROP2 by itself did not induce ROS generation or cell death (Fig. 4A and 5A); PA was required to initiate ROS generation and cell death even in CA-rop2 plants. In addition, ROS levels differed between the mutant and the WT plants only in the presence of PA (Fig. 5A). Therefore, the effect of PA on ROS production and cell death does not seem to be mediated via a direct activation of ROP small G protein by PA. The direct target of PA for activation of ROS generation remains to be determined.
PA specifically induced leaf cell death in Arabidopsis (Fig. 1, A and D). PAs with either di16:0 or di18:1 fatty acyl chains induced cell death, suggesting that the cell death induced by PA is independent of the fatty acyl chains (Fig. 1B). This result is also consistent with a previous report, which showed that PAs with various fatty acyl tails stimulated ROS production (Sang et al., 2001a
Because PA has a tendency to form hexagonal II phase in the presence of Ca2+ (Verkleij et al., 1982
Next, the mechanism of PA-induced leaf cell death was investigated. An important factor that induces cell death in plant cells is ROS including superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide (Lamb and Dixon, 1997
Guard cells actively participate in defense and stress responses because stomata are an exit pathway for water and a major entry site for pathogens. Therefore, guard cells respond to very diverse stimuli including hormones, abiotic stresses such as cadmium (Perfus-Barbeoch et al., 2002
ROP activation is implicated in defense responses and developmental processes that involve ROS generation (Kawasaki et al., 1999
Leaf cell death progression differed between the mutant and WT plants when floated in 500 µM PA solution (Fig. 4). This concentration is much higher than the PA concentration required to induce other physiological responses in other plant materials (Ritchie and Gilroy, 1998
In contrast to the pro-death effect of PA that we found, many animal studies found that PA at low concentrations has an anti-death function (Kishikawa et al., 1999
Interestingly, under normal conditions, CA-rop2 guard cells contained similar levels of ROS as WT or DN-rop2 (Fig. 5A). Moreover, CA-rop2 leaves did not display spontaneous cell death (Fig. 4A), indicating that activation of ROP alone was not sufficient to induce ROS production and cell death in Arabidopsis. At first glance, this result appears to contradict the data presented in Figure 3, where ROP2 enhanced ROS generation in an in vitro experiment. However, this discrepancy is very probably due to the presence in the in vitro assay of a high level of PA artificially generated during the process of plant homogenization. This interpretation is consistent with the previous report that the addition of PA induced significant effects on ROS production only when PLD
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions Seeds of WT, CA-rop2-, and DN-rop2-transformed Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia were sown in soil, grown in a growth chamber or greenhouse at 21°C ± 1°C under light/dark cycles of 16/8 h, and used at the 4- or 6-week-old stage.
Chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis) unless specifically indicated. Lipids and fatty acids tested in this study included di16:0-PA, di18:1-PA, di16:0-PC, di18:1 phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol from soybean (Glycine max), di16:0 phosphatidyl-Ser, 1-oleoyl lysophosphatidic acid (Avanti Polar Lipids, Birmingham, AL), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl diacylglycerol, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and myristic acid. The compounds were dissolved in organic solvents, dried under nitrogen gas, and then sonicated with water. Prepared lipid suspensions were infiltrated into rosette leaves of intact plants with the pressure of needleless syringe and, in the case of detached leaves, introduced by floating the leaves on the suspension. Unless indicated, di16:0-PA was used in all experiments.
The production of H2O2 in guard cells was examined using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; Lee et al., 1999
H2O2 was visualized in Arabidopsis leaf, using DAB as a substrate (Thordal-Christensen et al., 1997
The superoxide generation activity was assayed by the LDC method (Sang et al., 2001a
We thank Eunsook Jeong for managing the plants. Received August 6, 2003; returned for revision September 14, 2003; accepted September 14, 2003.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.031393.
1 This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation (grant no. KRF-2001-015-DS0052) and by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (grant no. 2000-6-203-01-2) awarded to Y.L. and Z.Y. * Corresponding author; e-mail ylee{at}postech.ac.kr; fax 82-54-279-2199.
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815[CrossRef][Medline]
Baxter-Burrell A, Yang Z, Springer PS, Bailey-Serres J (2002) RopGAP4-dependent Rop GTPase rheostat control of Arabidopsis oxygen deprivation tolerance. Science 296: 2026-2028 Cullis PR, de Kruijff B (1979) Lipid polymorphism and the functional roles of lipids in biological membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 559: 399-420[Medline] Doke N (1983) Involvement superoxide anion generation in hypersensitive response of potato tuber tissues to infection with an incompatible race of Phytopthora infestans. Physiol Plant Pathol 23: 345-347 Dwyer SC, Legendre L, Low PS, Leto TL (1996) Plant and human neutrophil oxidative burst complexes contain immunologically related proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1289: 231-237[Medline] Fan L, Zheng S, Wang X (1997) Antisense suppression of phospholipase D alpha retards abscisic acid- and ethylene-promoted senescence of post-harvest Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 9: 2183-2196[Abstract]
Frank W, Munnik T, Kerkmann K, Salamini F, Bartels D (2000) Water deficit triggers phospholipase D activity in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantgineum. Plant Cell 12: 111-123 Hetherington AM (2001) Guard cell signaling. Cell 107: 711-714[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jacob T, Ritchie S, Assmann SM, Gilroy S (1999) Abscisic acid signal transduction in guard cells is mediated by phospholipase D activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 12192-12197
Kawasaki T, Henmi K, Ono E, Hatakeyama S, Iwano M, Satoh H, Shimamoto K (1999) The small GTP-binding protein Rac is a regulator of cell death in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 10922-10926
Keller T, Damude HG, Wener D, Doerner P, Dixon RA, Lamb C (1998) A plant homolog of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase gp91phox subunit gene encodes a plasma membrane protein with Ca2+ binding motifs. Plant Cell 10: 255-266
Kishikawa K, Chalfant CE, Perry DK, Bielawska A, Hannun YA (1999) Phosphatidic acid is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 and an inhibitor of ceramide-mediated responses. J Biol Chem 274: 21335-21341 Lamb C, Dixon RA (1997) The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 251-275[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Lee S, Choi H, Suh S, Doo I-S, Oh K-Y, Choi EJ, Taylor ATS, Low PS, Lee Y (1999) Oligogalacturonic acid and chitosan reduce stomatal aperture by inducing the evolution of reactive oxygen species from guard cells of tomato and Commelina communis. Plant Physiol 121: 147-152 Lee S, Hirt H, Lee Y (2001) Phosphatidic acid activates a wound-activated MAPK in Glycine max. Plant J 26: 479-486[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Lee S, Park J, Lee Y (2003) Phosphatidic acid induces actin polymerization by activating protein kinases in soybean cells. Mol Cell 15: 313-319 Lee S, Suh S, Kim S, Crain RC, Kwak JM, Nam H-G, Lee Y (1997) Systemic elevation of phosphatidic acid and lysophospholipid levels in wounded plants. Plant J 12: 547-556[CrossRef] Lee SD, Lee BD, Han JM, Kim JH, Kim Y, Suh PG, Ryu SH (2000) Phospholipase D2 activity suppresses hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. J Neurochem 75: 1053-1059[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C (1994) H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Cell 79: 583-593[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Li H, Shen J-J, Zheng Z-L, Lin Y, Yang Z (2001) The Rop GTPase switch controls multiple developmental processes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126: 670-684 Liscovitch M, Czarny M, Fiucci G, Tang X (2000) Phospholipase D: molecular and cellular biology of a novel gene family. Biochem J 345: 401-415 Munnik T (2001) Phosphatidic acid: an emerging plant lipid second messenger. Trends Plant Sci 6: 227-233[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Munnik T, Meijer HJ, Ter Riet B, Hirt H, Frank W, Bartels D, Musgrave A (2000) Hyperosmotic stress stimulates phospholipase D activity and elevates the levels of phosphatidic acid and diacylglycerol pyrophosphate. Plant J 22: 147-154[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ono E, Wong HL, Kawasaki T, Hasegawa M, Kodama O, Shimamoto K (2001) Essential role of the small GTPase Rac in disease resistance of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 759-764
Palicz A, Foubert TR, Jesaitis AJ, Marodi L, McPhail LC (2001) Phosphatidic acid and diacylglycerol directly activate NADPH oxidase by interacting with enzyme components. J Biol Chem 276: 3090-3097
Park J, Choi H-J, Lee S, Lee T, Yang Z, Lee Y (2000) Rac-related GTP-binding protein in elicitor-induced reactive oxygen generation by suspension-cultured soybean cells. Plant Physiol 124: 725-732
Park K-Y, Jung J-Y, Park J, Hwang J-U, Kim Y-W, Hwang I, Lee Y (2003) A role of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in ABA-induced reactive oxygen species generation in guard cells. Plant Physiol 132: 92-98 Pei ZM, Murata Y, Benning G, Thomine S, Klusener B, Allen GJ, Grill E, Schroeder JI (2000) Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signaling in guard cells. Nature 406: 731-734[CrossRef][Medline] Perfus-Barbeoch L, Leonhardt N, Vavasseur A, Forestier C (2002) Heavy metal toxicity: cadmium permeates through calcium channels and disturbs the plant water status. Plant J 32: 539-548[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Popescu AT, Vidulescu C, Stanciu CL, Popescu BO, Popescu LM (2002) Selective protection by phosphatidic acid against staurosporine-induced neuronal apoptosis. J Cell Mol Med 6: 433-438[Medline]
Potikha TS, Collins CC, Johnson DI, Delmer DP, Levine A (1999) The involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the differentiation of secondary walls in cotton fibers. Plant Physiol 119: 849-858
Regier DS, Greene DG, Sergeant S, Jesaitis AJ, McPhail LC (2000) Phosphorylation of p22phox is mediated by phospholipase D-dependent and -independent mechanisms: correlation of NADPH oxidase activity and p22phox phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 275: 28406-28412
Regier DS, Waite KA, Wallin R, McPhail LC (1999) A phosphatidic acid-activated protein kinase and conventional protein kinase C isoforms phosphorylate p22phox, an NADPH oxidase component. J Biol Chem 274: 36601-36608
Ritchie S, Gilroy S (1998) Abscisic acid signal transduction in the barley aleurone is mediated by phospholipase D activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 2697-2702 Ryu SB, Wang X (1995) Expression of phospholipase D during castor bean leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 108: 713-719[Abstract] Ryu SB, Wang X (1996) Activation of phospholipase D and the possible mechanism of activation in wound-induced lipid hydrolysis in castor bean leaves. Biochim Biophys Acta 1303: 243-250[Medline] Ryu SB, Wang X (1998) Increase in free linolenic and linoleic acids associated with phospholipase D-mediated hydrolysis of phospholipids in wounded castor bean leaves. Biochim Biophys Acta 1393: 193-202[Medline]
Sang Y, Cui D, Wang X (2001a) Phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid-mediated generation of superoxide in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126: 1449-1458 Sang Y, Zheng S, Li W, Huang B, Wang X (2001b) Regulation of plant water loss by manipulating the expression of phospholipase D alpha. Plant J 28: 135-144[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Schroeder JI, Kwak JM, Allen GJ (2001) Guard cell abscisic acid signaling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature 410: 327-330[CrossRef][Medline] Siddiqui RA, Jenski LJ, Wiesehan JD, Hunter MV, Kovacs RJ, Stillwell W (2001) Prevention of docosahexaenoic acid-induced cytotoxicity by phosphatidic acid in Jurkat leukemic cells: the role of protein phosphatase-1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1541: 188-200[Medline] Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants: H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 11: 1187-1194[CrossRef][Web of Science] Torres MA, Onouchi H, Hamada S, Machida C, Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD (1998) Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91phox). Plant J 14: 365-370[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] van Camp W, van Montagu M, Inzé D (1998) H2O2 and NO: redox signals in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci 3: 330-334[CrossRef]
van der Luit AH, Piatti T, van Doorn A, Musgrave A, Felix G, Boller T, Munnik T (2000) Elicitation of suspension-cultured tomato cells triggers the formation of phosphatidic acid and diacylglycerol pyrophosphate. Plant Physiol 123: 1507-1516 Verkleij AJ, de Maagd R, Leunissen-Bijvelt J, de Kruijff B (1982) Divalent cations and chlorpromazine can induce non-bilayer structures in phosphatidic acid-containing model membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 684: 255-262[Medline]
Waite KA, Walline R, Qualliotine-Mann D, McPhail LC (1997) Phosphatidic acid-mediated phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidase component p47-phox: evidence that phosphatidic acid may activate a novel kinase. J Biol Chem 272: 15569-15578
Welti R, Li W, Li M, Sang Y, Biesiada H, Zhou H-E, Rajashekar CB, Williams TD, Wang X (2002) Profiling membrane lipids in plant stress responses. J Biol Chem 277: 31994-32002
Wu G, Li H, Yang Z (2000) Arabidopsis RopGAPs are a novel family of rho GTPase-activating proteins that require the Cdc42/Rac-interactive binding motif for rop-specific GTPase stimulation. Plant Physiol 124: 1625-1636 Xing T, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E (1997) Race-specific elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum promote translocation of cytosolic components of NADPH oxidase to the plasma membrane of tomato cells. Plant Cell 9: 249-259[Abstract]
Yang Z (2002) Small GTPase: versatile signaling switches in plants. Plant Cell 14: S375-S388 Young SA, Wang X, Leach JE (1996) Changes in the plasma membrane distribution of rice phopholipase D during resistant interactions with Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae. Plant Cell 8: 1079-1090[Abstract] Zien CA, Wang C, Wang X, Welti R (2001) In vivo substrates and the contribution of the common phospholipase D, PLDalpha, to wound-induced metabolism of lipids in Arabidopsis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1530: 236-248[Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|