|
|
||||||||
|
First published online January 22, 2004; 10.1104/pp.103.029355 Plant Physiology 134:676-683 (2004) © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Identification and Functional Analysis of a Locus for Improvement of Lodging Resistance in Rice1,[w]National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Kannondai 2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058602, Japan
We identified a new locus responsible for increased pushing resistance of the lower part of rice (Oryza sativa) and analyzed its physiological function to understand how to improve lodging resistance in rice. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling pushing resistance of the lower part were analyzed in a population of backcross inbred lines of japonica Nipponbare x indica Kasalath plants cut out at 40 cm to exclude the effect of the weight of the upper parts. Five QTLs for pushing resistance were detected; only one QTL from Kasalath on chromosome 5 (prl5) had a positive effect. The likelihood odds ratio curve of prl5 echoed that for lodging resistance by typhoon. We selected three near-isogenic lines (NILs) in which the chromosomal region of prl5 was substituted with that of Kasalath in the Nipponbare background. The dry weights and densities and the contents of accumulated carbohydrate in stems below 40 cm (lower stems) in each NIL were significantly higher than those of Nipponbare. There was no difference between Nipponbare and the NILs in yield, root characteristics, or the weights of the upper parts. Pushing resistance of the lower part and lodging resistance in the NILs were up to twice as high as in Nipponbare. These results suggest that prl5 might affect the characteristics of the lower stems of the NILs, thus increasing lodging resistance.
Lodging is a common problem in most cereals and various other crops, including wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), oats (Avena sativa; Mulder, 1954
Plant height has been the main target for improvement of lodging resistance. The detection and introduction of semidwarf lines was one of the main factors responsible for the higher yields of rice and wheat in the "green revolution" (Keller et al., 1999
The optimum plant height for maximum photosynthetic capacity in a canopy is between 70 and 100 cm in wheat (Flintham et al., 1997
Plant height is not necessarily the most important factor determining lodging resistance in rice (Ookawa and Ishihara, 1992
The development of a molecular genetic map and DNA markers has made it easy to analyze quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for complex traits (Tanksley, 1993
From the point of view of dynamics, lodging resistance in a plant is determined by two main factors, the weight of the upper part (ears and upper leaves and stems) and the pushing resistance of the lower part (Mulder, 1954 We hypothesized that improving pushing resistance of the lower part might improve lodging resistance. To test this hypothesis, we looked for QTLs for pushing resistance in rice backcross inbred lines (BILs) that had their upper parts cut off to exclude their effects. Then, we attempted to identify one QTL and to elucidate its physiological function and its effect on lodging resistance in selected NILs in which its chromosomal region was substituted with that of another line.
Variation in Pushing Resistance in the Lower Part and Correlation between Pushing Resistance and Other Traits in BILs Ninety-eight BILs and two parental lines (Nipponbare and Kasalath) were cut off at 40 cm from the ground at the full-ripe stage, and pushing resistance of the lower part was measured when plants were pushed in the middle (20 cm) to 45° from the vertical (Fig. 1A). BILs showed continuous variation in pushing resistance of the lower part, between 0.11 and 1.60 N cm2 (Fig. 1B). There were two peaks (at 0.320.64 and 0.740.95 N cm2). Pushing resistance in Kasalath (1.26 ± 0.17 N cm2) was 4.5 times the value in Nipponbare (0.28 ± 0.03 N cm2). A low positive correlation was found between pushing resistance and crown width (r = 0.201) in BILs, but there was no significant correlation with stem diameter, stem number, or plant height (data not shown).
QTLs controlling pushing resistance of the lower part, traits related to plant type (stem diameter, stem no., plant height, and crown width), and lodging resistance in a typhoon in 2002 were detected (Fig. 2). Five QTLs for pushing resistance of the lower part were detected on chromosomes 4 to 6, 11, and 12 and accounted for 0.636 (r2) of the total phenotypic variation (Fig. 2; Table I). Those on chromosomes 6 and 12 had the highest LOD scores and overlapped with QTLs for plant height. Kasalath had a positive allele only at the QTL on chromosome 5 (tentatively named prl5). Six QTLs for stem diameter were located on chromosomes 1, 3, 6 to 8, and 12 and explained 84.7% of total phenotypic variation (Table I). The QTLs for pushing resistance did not overlap with those controlling stem diameter or crown width. Two QTLs for lodging resistance by typhoon were detected on chromosome 5, having positive alleles from Kasalath, and one was detected on chromosome 6, having a positive allele from Nipponbare. On chromosome 5, QTL for lodging resistance by typhoon near marker C246 overlapped with the QTL for pushing resistance of the lower part.
Figure 3 shows LOD curves of prl5 and of the QTL for lodging resistance by typhoon on chromosome 5. prl5 shows three peaks, the highest of which was detected near C1018. The LOD curve of prl5 echoed that for lodging resistance by typhoon. Among a series of rice NILs developed by Yano's group (Yano, 2001
The pushing resistances of the lower part in NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63 were 1.8, 1.4, and 2.4 times, respectively, as high as that in Nipponbare; all differences were significant (Fig. 4). Lodging resistance was measured as pushing resistance with whole plants. The lodging resistances in NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63 were 2.4, 1.9, and 2.3 times, respectively, as high as that in Nipponbare; all differences were significant. The pushing resistance in NIL63 was significantly higher than those in NIL43 and NIL60 (1.3 and 1.7 times, P[f] < 0.01).
Plant height in NIL60 and NIL63 was significantly greater than that in Nipponbare, whereas that in NIL43 was significantly less than those in the other NILs and Nipponbare (Table II). The heights of the second leaf below the flag leaf (2 leaf height) from the ground and the stem numbers were similar among plants. The stem diameter of NIL63 was significantly larger than that of Nipponbare (P[f] < 0.01). Crown widths in all NILs were significantly larger than in Nipponbare. There was no difference in yield among lines. The root dry weight to 10-cm depth in Nipponbare was 3.35 ± 0.34 g (data not shown), that in NIL43 was similar, and that in NIL60 was 20% less than that in Nipponbare (P[f] < 0.01), whereas that in NIL63 was 30% greater (P[f] < 0.05). There were no significant differences in root dry weight below 10 cm (data not shown). The dry weights of the upper parts (leaves and stems above 40 cm) in the NILs were not lower than that in Nipponbare, and the dry weight of the upper parts in NIL63 was higher than that in Nipponbare. Compared with Nipponbare, heading date was 12 d earlier in NIL60 and 2 d later in NIL43 and NIL63 (data not shown).
The dry weights of stems below 40 cm (lower stem) were significantly greater in all NILs than that in Nipponbare by 50% to 110% (Table II). The densities of the lower stems were significantly greater in all NILs than in Nipponbare by 25% to 50%. The contents of accumulated carbohydrates in lower stems were significantly higher in the NILs than in Nipponbare: The contents of starch in NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63 were 3.5, 5.0, and 10.2 times and those of Suc were 1.5, 1.6, and 2.0 times as high as those in Nipponbare. The relative contents of silicon in the lower stems were estimated from energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectra. The silicon peaks of Nipponbare were all higher than those of the NILs; NIL63 showed the lowest peak (see Supplemental Fig. 2). The relative contents (in counts per second) of silicon in Nipponbare also were significantly higher than those in NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63; again, NIL63 had the lowest content (58% of that in Nipponbare; Table II).
Pushing resistance of the lower part was measured in rice BILs that had its upper part cut off to exclude its effect. We detected five QTLs for pushing resistance of the lower part (Fig. 2; Table I). Among them, only prl5 had a positive allele from Kasalath and did not overlap with other QTLs related to plant type. The LOD curve of prl5 echoed that for lodging resistance by typhoon, and these QTLs had the same positive allele (Fig. 3). These results indicate that prl5 should be the main target for identification. NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63 contain the chromosomal region of prl5 from Kasalath in a Nipponbare background, and NIL43 also carries prl11 (Fig. 3; Supplemental Fig. 1). Heading date and plant height differed among NILs (data not shown; Table II): In addition to prl5, each NIL carries different Kasalath segments (see Supplemental Fig. 1), which caused these differences.
Pushing resistance of the lower part and lodging resistance in each NIL were significantly higher than in Nipponbare (Fig. 4). These results support the existence of prl5. Lodging resistance in a plant is determined by the weight of the upper parts and the pushing resistance (Mulder, 1954
By comparing the characters of NILs that carry different segments from the donor parent, we can elucidate epistatic interactions among QTLs (Lin et al., 2000
Terashima et al. (1994
Higher contents of accumulated carbohydrates in rice stems contribute greatly to lodging resistance (Sato, 1957
In rice, yield is determined by the amount of accumulated carbohydrates in stems before heading and the photosynthates produced during the reproductive stages (Yoshida, 1972 In conclusion, we have identified a new locus responsible for pushing resistance of the lower part and, thus, lodging resistance. Physiological analyses of NILs containing Kasalath segments including prl5 suggested that the higher contents of carbohydrates in the lower stems because of prl5 might determine the higher pushing resistance. The results of this study strongly suggest that pushing resistance of the lower part could be a new target for improving lodging resistance in rice. We have shown that prl5 can improve lodging resistance without negative effects on other traits (e.g. yield and plant height); therefore, it might be suitable for introduction into modern rice cultivars.
Plant Materials
Rice (Oryza sativa subsp. japonica) cv Nipponbare, Japan's high-yielding cultivar (Saitoh et al., 1993
At the full-ripe stage (45 d after heading), plants were cut off at 40-cm height, the prostrate tester (Daiki Rika Kogyou Co., Tokyo) was set perpendicularly at the middle of the plant (20 cm), and pushing resistance of the lower part was measured when plants were pushed to an angle of 45° from the vertical (Fig. 1A). Five plants in each line were used. The stem diameter was measured at 40 cm. Lodging resistance by typhoon was observed on October 2, 2002, the day after the season's 21st typhoon had hit. That resistance rating was recorded on a scale of 0 (prostrating) to 1 (no or little prostrating). This typhoon had a maximum momentary wind velocity of 31.6 m s1 and a maximum rainfall rate of 21 mm h1 (http://www.tokyo-jma.go.jp/home/mito/).
Chromosome locations of putative QTLs were determined by singlepoint analysis with the General Linear model procedure of QGENE version 3.06 (Nelson, 1997
By marker-assisted selection, we selected NIL43, NIL60, and NIL63 from advanced backcross progeny of Nipponbare as the recurrent parent and Kasalath as the donor parent bred by Yano's group at the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (Yano, 2001
Pushing resistance in NILs and Nipponbare was measured as above. Lodging resistance was measured as for pushing resistance but on whole plants. Six plants in each line were used for measurement. Next, plant height, 2 leaf height, stem diameter, crown width, and the weight and number of ears were measured. Then, plants were divided into two parts at 40 cm; the lower stem and the upper part were sampled, oven dried at 80°C for 3 d, and weighed. The density of a lower stem was calculated as dry weight/[
Dried samples of lower stems were powdered at 15,000 rpm for 90 s in a Wonder Blender (Osaka Chemical Co., Osaka). Carbohydrate contents were measured enzymatically according to the method of Ishimaru et al. (2001a
We thank Masahiro Yano (National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan) for kindly giving us seeds of BILs and NILs, Hijri Haga and Kouhei Miyazaki (University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan) for their help in QTL analyses, and Tomoe Yanai and Mieko Kuroishi (National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences) for help in measurement of carbohydrates. Received July 2, 2003; returned for revision August 27, 2003; accepted November 18, 2003.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.029355.
1 This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Grant-in-Aid; Bio Cosmos Program).
[w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. * Corresponding author; e-mail kenshi{at}nias.affrc.go.jp; fax 81298388347.
Adelana BO (1980) Relationship between lodging, morphological characters and yield of tomato cultivars. Sci Hortic 13: 143148
Aquino RC, Jennings PR (1966) Inheritance and significance of dwarfism in an indica rice variety. Crop Sci 6: 551554
Ashikari M, Wu JZ, Yano M, Sasaki T, Yoshimura A (1999) Rice gibberellin-insensitive Dwarf 1 gene encodes the alpha-subunit of GTP-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1028410289 Bergmeyer HU, Bernt E (1974) Methods for determination of metabolites: carbohydrate metabolism: sucrose. In HU Bergmeyer, ed, Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 11761179 Cao X, Zhu Q, Yang J (1992) Classification of source-sink types in rice varieties with corresponding cultivated ways. In Min S, ed, Prospects of Rice Farming for 2000. Zhejiang Publishing House of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China, pp 360365 Carter PR, Hudelson KD (1988) Influence of simulated wind lodging on corn growth and grain yield. J Prod Agric 1: 295299 Cock JH, Yoshida S (1972) Accumulation of 14C-labelled carbohydrate before flowering and its subsequent redistribution and respiration in the rice plants. Proc Crop Sci Soc Jpn 41: 226234
Cong B, Liu J, Tanksley SD (2002) Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1360613611 Cooper RL (1981) Development of short-statured soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 21: 127131 Duwayri M, Tran DV, Nguyen VN (2000) Reflections on yield gaps in rice production: how to narrow the gaps. Binding the Rice Yield Gap in the Asia-Pacific Region. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X6905E/x6905e05.htm#REFLECTIONS%20ON%20YIELD%20GAPS%20IN%20RICE%20PRODUCTION%20HOW%20TO%20NARROW%20THE%GAPS%20Mahmud%20Duwayril,%20Dat%20Van%20Tran2,%20and%20Van%20Nguu%20Nguyen3 Easson DL, White EM, Pickles SJ (1993) The effect of weather, seed rate and cultivar on lodging and yield in winter wheat. J Agric Sci 121: 145156 Flintham JE, Börner A, Worland AJ, Gale MD (1997) Optimizing wheat grain yield: effects of Rht (gibberellin-insensitive) dwarfing genes. J Agric Sci 128: 1125[CrossRef]
Foster KW, Rutger JN (1978) Inheritance of semidwarfism in rice, Oryza sativa L. Genetics 88: 559574
Fujisawa Y, Kato T, Ohki S, Ishikawa A, Kitano H, Sasaki T, Asahi T, Iwasaki Y (1999) Suppression of the heterotrimeric G protein causes abnormal morphology, including dwarfism, in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 75757580
Hirel B, Bertin P, Quilleré I, Bourdoncle W, Attagnant C, Dellay C, Gouy A, Cadiou S, Retailliau C, Falque M et al. (2001) Towards a better understanding of the genetic and physiological basis for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Physiol 125: 12581270 Idris MD, Hossain MM, Choudhury FA (1975) The effect of silicon on lodging of rice in presence of added nitrogen. Plant Soil 43: 691695[CrossRef]
Ishimaru K (2003) Identification of a locus increasing rice yield and physiological analysis of its function. Plant Physiol 133: 10831090
Ishimaru K, Hirose T, Aoki N, Takahashi S, Ono K, Yamamoto S, Wu J, Saji S, Baba T, Ugaki M et al. (2001a) Antisense expression of a rice sucrose transporter OsSUT1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 42: 11811185
Ishimaru K, Kobayashi N, Ono K, Yano M, Ohsugi R (2001b) Are contents of Rubisco, soluble protein and nitrogen in flag leaves of rice controlled by the same genetics? J Exp Bot 52: 18271833 Ishimaru K, Shirota K, Higa M, Kawamitsu Y (2001c) Identification of quantitative trait loci for adaxial and abaxial stomatal frequencies in Oryza sativa. Plant Physiol Biochem 39: 173177[CrossRef] Ishimaru K, Yano M, Aoki N, Ono K, Hirose T, Lin SY, Monna L, Sasaki T, Ohsugi R (2001d) Toward the mapping of physiological and agronomic characters on a rice function map: QTL analysis and comparison between QTLs and expressed sequence tags. Theor Appl Genet 102: 793800[CrossRef] Jones L, Ennos AR, Turner SR (2001) Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): a severely lignin-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J 26: 205216[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Keller M, Karutz Ch, Schmid JE, Stamp P, Winzeler M, Keller B, Messmer MM (1999) Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance in a segregating wheat x spelt population. Theor Appl Genet 98: 11711182[CrossRef] Khush GS (1999) Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 42: 646655[Medline] Kono M (1995) Physiological aspects of lodging. In T Matsuo, K Kumazawa, R Ishii, K Ishihara, H Hirata, eds, Science of the Rice Plant, Vol 2, Physiology. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, Tokyo, pp 971982 Kumar A, Tiwari RKS, Parihar SS, Pandya KS, Janoria MP (1999) Performance of prototype rice lines from ideotype breeding. Int Rice Res Notes 24: 1819
Larson JC, Maranville JW (1977) Alterations of yield, test weight, and protein in lodged grain sorghum. Agron J 69: 629630 Lin HX, Liang ZW, Sasaki T, Yano M (2003) Fine mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci Hd4 and Hd5 controlling heading date in rice. Breed Sci 53: 5159[CrossRef] Lin HX, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, Yano M (2000) Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of 3 QTLs, Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date in rice using nearly isogenic lines Theor Appl Genet 101: 10211028[CrossRef][ISI] Lin SY, Sasaki T, Yano M (1998) Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines Theor Appl Genet 96: 9971003[CrossRef][ISI] Matsuzaki A, Matsushima S, Tomita T, Katsuki E (1972) Analysis of yield-determining process and its application to yield-prediction and culture improvement of lowland rice. CIX. Effects of nitrogen topdressing at full heading stage on lodging resistance, root activity, yield and kernel quality Jpn J Crop Sci 41: 139146
Mackill DJ, Rutger JN (1979) The inheritance of induced-mutant semidwarfing genes in rice. J Hered 70: 335341 McKee CG, Aycock MK Jr (1976) Field testing for lodging resistance of Maryland tobacco cultivars with artificially produced wind. Tob Sci 20: 12 Minami M, Ujihara A (1991) Effects of lodging on dry matter production, grain yield and nutritional composition at different growth stages in maize (Zea mays L.). Jpn J Crop Sci 60: 107115 Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Suzuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y, Tanji M, Sato M, Nasu S, Minobe Y (2002) Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice "green revolution gene" encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 9: 1117[Abstract] Mulder EG (1954) Effect of mineral nutrition on lodging of cereals. Plant Soil 5: 246306[CrossRef] Nelson JC (1997) QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3: 239245
Noor RBM, Caviness CE (1980) Influence of induced lodging on pod distribution and seed yield in soybeans. Agron J 72: 904906 Ookawa T, Ishihara K (1992) Varietal difference of physical characteristics of the culm related to lodging resistance in paddy rice. Jpn J Crop Sci 61: 419425 Pinthus MJ (1973) Lodging in wheat, barley, and oats: the phenomenon, its causes, and preventive measures. Adv Agron 25: 209263 Saitoh K, Shimoda H, Ishihara K (1993) Characteristics of dry matter production process in high-yield rice varieties. Jpn J Crop Sci 62: 509517 Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Khush GS et al. (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416: 701702[CrossRef][Medline] Sato K (1957) Studies on the starch contained in the tissues of rice plant: IV. Starch content in the culm related to lodging. Jpn J Crop Sci 26: 1919 Sato Y, Sentoku N, Miura Y, Hirochika H, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (1999) Loss-of-function mutations in the rice homeobox gene OSH15 affect the architecture of internodes resulting in dwarf plants. EMBO J 18: 9921002[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Setter TL, Laureles EV, Mazaredo AM (1997) Lodging reduces yield of rice by self-shading and reductions in canopy photosynthesis. Field Crops Res 49: 95106
Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), "green revolution" rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 90439048 Takahashi E (1995) Uptake mode and physiological functions of silica. In T Matsuo, K Kumazawa, R Ishii, K Ishihara, H Hirata, eds, Science of the Rice Plant, Physiology. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, Tokyo, pp 1111 Takahashi J (1960) Some thoughts on the lodging of rice plants. Agric Hortic 35: 1923 Takaya T, Miyasaka A (1983) Prevention of lodging of rice plants under direct sowing culture on well-drained paddy field. Jpn J Crop Sci 52: 714 Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27: 205233[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Taylor NG, Scheible W-R, Cutler S, Somerville CR, Turner SR (1999) The irregular xylem3 locus of Arabidopsis encodes a cellulose synthase required for secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Cell 11: 769779 Terashima K, Akita S, Sakai N (1992) Eco-physiological characteristics related with lodging tolerance of rice in direct sowing cultivation. I. Comparison of the root lodging tolerance among cultivars by the measurement of pushing resistance. Jpn J Crop Sci 61: 380387 Terashima K, Ogata T, Akita S (1994) Eco-physiological characteristics related with lodging tolerance of rice in direct sowing cultivation: II. Root growth characteristics of tolerant cultivars to root lodging Jpn J Crop Sci 63: 3441
Vázquez MD, Poschenrieder C, Corrales I, Barceló J (1999) Change in apoplastic aluminum during the initial growth response to aluminum by roots of a tolerant maize variety. Plant Physiol 119: 435444 Walton LR, Casada JH (1979) Physical characteristics of barley varieties affecting lodging resistance. Tob Sci 23: 8386
Weber CR, Fehr WR (1966) Seed yield losses from lodging and combine harvesting in soybeans. Agron J 58: 287289 Xing YZ, Tan YF, Hua JP, Sun XL, Xu CG, Zhang Q (2002) Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 105: 248257[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q (2001) Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. J Exp Bot 52: 21692179 Yano M (2001) Genetic and molecular dissection of naturally occurring variation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4: 130135[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Yoshida S (1972) Physiological aspects of grain yield. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 23: 437464 Zhu Q, Zhang Z, Yang J, Cao X, Lang Y, Wang Z (1997) Source-sink characteristics related to the yield in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin 4: 5259 This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|