|
|
||||||||
|
First published online June 4, 2004; 10.1104/pp.104.040022 Plant Physiology 135:1050-1058 (2004) © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Cell Cycle Modulation in the Response of the Primary Root of Arabidopsis to Salt Stress1Department of Plant Systems Biology, University of Ghent/Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), 9052 Ghent, Belgium
Salt stress inhibits plant growth and development. We investigated the importance of cell cycle regulation in mediating the primary root growth response of Arabidopsis to salt stress. When seedlings were transferred to media with increasing concentrations of NaCl, root growth rate was progressively reduced. At day 3 after transfer of seedlings to growth medium containing 0.5% NaCl the primary roots grew at a constant rate well below that prior to the transfer, whereas those transferred to control medium kept accelerating. Kinematic analysis revealed that the growth reduction of the stressed roots was due to a decrease in cell production and a smaller mature cell length. Surprisingly, average cell cycle duration was not affected. Hence, the reduced cell production was due to a smaller number of dividing cells, i.e. a meristem size reduction. To analyze the mechanism of meristem size adaptation prior to day 3, we investigated the short-term cell cycle events following transfer to saline medium. Directly after transfer cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity and CYCB1;2 promoter activity were transiently reduced. Because protein levels of both CDKA;1 and CDKB1;1 were not affected, the temporary inhibition of mitotic activity that allows adaptation to the stress condition is most likely mediated by posttranslational control of CDK activity. Thus, the adaptation to salt stress involves two phases: first, a rapid transient inhibition of the cell cycle that results in fewer cells remaining in the meristem. When the meristem reaches the appropriate size for the given conditions, cell cycle duration returns to its default.
Due to their sessile lifestyle, plants have to be extremely adept to adjust their growth to environmental conditions. Consequently, growth regulation is a central theme in plant research. Surprisingly, there is still no consensus on the role of elemental growth processes, cell division and expansion, in the regulation of whole organ and plant level responses. Considering the organ as a whole, the rate at which an organ grows is determined by the size of the region where expansion occurs and by the specific expansion rates in this region. Conceivably, both of these parameters are specified by positional controls acting on the expansion process (Cooke and Lu, 1992
As cells are first produced prior to their expansion, it is plausible that the rate of cell production is a determining factor for the rate at which an organ grows. Evidence from transgenic plants overproducing cell cycle genes supports this contention (Doerner et al., 1996
Cell cycle regulators presumably control both cell cycle duration and the number of dividing cells. Experimental evidence suggests that the control of these parameters is largely independent. Ontogenetic acceleration of in vitro grown Arabidopsis roots was accompanied by an increasing number of cells in the meristem while average cell cycle duration remained constant (Beemster and Baskin, 1998
In Arabidopsis, several classes of CDKs have been identified, of which the A-type and B-types have been best characterized (Vandepoele et al., 2002
To assess the importance of cell cycle regulation in the adaptation to environmental conditions, we investigated the involvement of the cell cycle regulatory system in root growth response to adverse conditions, specifically salt stress. Saline soil is an important agronomic problem, particularly on irrigated fields in arid climates. It has two major physiological effects on plants: (1) it decreases the water potential, thus hindering soil water uptake, and (2) in the plant it disturbs cellular ion homeostasis resulting in an inhibition of several metabolic processes (for review, see Hasegawa et al., 2000
It has previously been shown that impaired root growth caused by osmotic stress conditions was associated with a reduced cell division activity (Sacks et al., 1997 Here we show that response to salt stress involves inhibition of cell production by inhibition of cell cycle progression and reduction of meristem size. The primary and transient response involves a rapid decline of cell cycle activity throughout the meristem, which in turn reduces the meristem size. After 3 d on 0.5% NaCl local cell cycle activities return to control values, but a reduced size of the meristem now leads to fewer cells being produced.
Root Elongation
We determined the growth rate at the primary root tip of Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seedlings growing on agar solidified medium by marking daily the position of the root tip on the plates. By measuring the distances between these marks, we calculated average daily growth rates. Transferring roots by itself transiently affected growth rates for less than 1 h (data not shown); thereafter root growth accelerated over time (Fig. 1) as described earlier (Beemster and Baskin, 1998
Local Cell Elongation
To investigate the effect of salt stress on cell production and expansion, we performed a kinematic analysis. This analysis is one-dimensional, essentially simplifying the root to a single representative file of a particular cell type, in this case the cortical cell file. The use of this one-dimensional approach was justified as we did not detect the morphological and structural changes in the root tip, such as swelling, observed by Burssens et al. (2000)
The kinematic analysis was performed at day 3 after transfer to a NaCl concentration of 0 or 0.5% (w/w), respectively. Without salt, conditions the growth of primary roots accelerates with time after germination. This is the result of an increasing number of dividing cells, leading to an increase of the number of cells that flow in the elongation zone per unit of time and hence an accelerating root elongation rate. Therefore, cell length profiles at additional timepoints have to be determined for the control roots. In the presence of 0.5% NaCl, root growth is approximately steady-state, which simplified the analysis. As there is no increase in number of dividing cells, no local rate of change of cell density needs to be determined (Beemster and Baskin, 1998
Although cell division is presumably involved in growth regulation, this is only achieved by cell expansion as only enlargement of cellular volume rather than its subdivision constitutes growth. Thus, one can consider the growth of the organ as a whole in a spatial manner without considering its constituent cells as such. This is the Eulerian or spatial view in opposition to the Lagrangian or cellular perspective (Kaplan, 1992 This profile has a typical shape in which three zones can be distinguished (Fig. 2A): most apically a zone of slow acceleration, followed by a region of fast acceleration, and finally a zone where the velocity has reached a constant value, which equals root elongation rate. At the end of the growth zone the velocity in the control roots and the roots growing on 0.5% NaCl reached a velocity of 388 ± 31 µm h1 and of 263 ± 17 µm h1, respectively (Table I). These values were not significantly different from the elongation rate of undisturbed roots in the same experiment, showing absence of an effect of experimental handling for microscopic observations.
Strain Rate Profile The increase of the local velocity in function of the position on the root axis is the result of cell expansion. Inversely, the local rate of cell expansion can be determined as the local derivative of the velocity function. Its profile is typically bell-shaped with a maximum near the center of the curve (Fig. 2B). The curve resulting from growth on 0.5% NaCl extended over a shorter distance from the QC compared to the control roots, but the maximal strain rate was not significantly affected. The size of the growth zone, i.e. the distance between the QC and the position on the root axis where the strain rate becomes zero, was 2,730 ± 254 µm for the control roots and 1,655 ± 143 µm for the roots on saline medium, a reduction of approximately 40% (Table I). Thus, from a spatial perspective the reduced growth rate of the roots under salt stress is associated with a shortening of the growth zone.
To gain insight into the cellular perspective, we measured cortical cell length in function of position along the root axis in the apical region on the same roots directly following the time-lapse analysis. Typically, cell length is roughly constant in the most apical region of the growth zone (i.e. 0200 µm from the QC), increases rapidly in the expansion zone, and is constant in the mature part of the root (Fig. 2C). In the apical region, we observed no significant difference in cell length between salt stressed and control roots, implying that the size at which cells divide is unaffected by the treatment. However, in correspondence to the expansion rates, cell length started to increase closer to the tip of the salt-grown roots, suggesting a decrease in the size of the meristem. Consequently, cells were significantly larger between approximately 200 µm and approximately 900 µm from the QC in the salt stressed roots than in the control roots. In salt stressed roots mature cell length is reduced (156 ± 7 µm) compared to the control roots (205 ± 9 µm; Table I) and consistent with the shortening of the growth zone, this reduced cell length is reached closer to the root tip.
The size of the meristem was determined as the distance between the QC and the position where local cell flux, calculated as the ratio between velocity and cell length, becomes constant (Beemster and Baskin, 1998 Mature cell length depends on the length of cells leaving the meristem (ldiv), residence time of the cell in the elongation zone (Tel) and the rate of expansion while they are in the elongation zone. Maximal strain rate (Rmax) and Tel were not affected by the presence of NaCl (Table I), suggesting that the dynamics of cell expansion when cells have left the meristem were essentially unaffected. Instead, the length of cells leaving the meristem was approximately 40% shorter in salt stressed roots (Table I). Therefore it appears that NaCl induces cells to stop dividing at a smaller size than they normally do, and that this initial reduction in size is maintained as cells undergo a very similar expansion program in the elongation zone. Thus, at day 3 after transfer reduced root growth was linked to fewer and smaller cells being produced in the meristem. The lower cell production was exclusively due to a reduced number of dividing cells in the meristem and the smaller size of mature cells to smaller cells leaving the meristem. This focused our attention on the changes occurring in the meristem. We reasoned that the reduced meristem size might have been caused by a temporary inhibition of cell cycle duration in the days prior to our analysis. To investigate this possibility, we analyzed in more detail the effect of transition at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 72 h after transfer to the salt-containing medium. As our kinematic approach does not have a high degree of temporal resolution, we resorted to alternative parameters of cell cycle behavior.
Cell cycle progression is regulated to a great extent by the activity of CDK complexes (Mironov et al., 1999 The histone H1 phosphorylation rate of control roots was roughly constant throughout the experiment (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the CDK activity in the salt stressed roots showed a strong reduction after 2 h, followed by a gradual recovery to near control levels at 72 h. Because all samples obtained from the apical 5 mm of the root contain similar amounts of total protein, the samples of salt stressed roots presumably contain a higher fraction of protein from mature tissue as a consequence of the smaller meristem size. The kinase assay is therefore an integrated measure of total cell production rather than division rates per se. This presumably explains why the kinase activity remained slightly lower in the salt stressed roots at 72 h after transfer, when cell cycle duration is no longer affected.
Western analysis of the same samples, using anti-CDKA;1 and anti-CDKB1;1 specific antibodies, showed that the protein level of both CDKs was not significantly affected by the transfer to the saline medium (Fig. 3, B and C). Thus, the reduction in CDK activity in the stressed roots is not the result of a lower abundance of CDKs but due to posttranslational control.
To investigate one aspect of CDK activation, we also analyzed the promoter activity of the mitotic cyclin CYCB1;2. Therefore, we used a transgenic line carrying a construct with GUS fused to the CYCB1;2 promoter and the region that includes the cyclin destruction box of CYCB1;2 (Donnelly et al., 1999 The histochemical detection of the GUS protein shows a patchy pattern, which is the result of cell cycle phases being more or less random in cells and the construct being transcribed during only a small part of the cell cycle and then rapidly degraded (Fig. 4).
Although some root-to-root variation occurs, the GUS expression pattern remained essentially unaltered over time under control conditions. In contrast, 2 h after transfer to the saline medium, the size of the zone of cells expressing the GUS gene is reduced by about 50%, whereas in the remaining zone a smaller fraction of cells were stained. This suggests a severely decreased mitotic activity in the meristem, particularly in the basal half, where it is completely abolished (Fig. 4). In the salt stressed roots, the density of cells expressing the reporter gene gradually increases (Fig. 4) and is roughly similar to that of the control roots after 72 h. However, at the same time the size of the region of stained cells does not recover, explaining the reduction of the meristem size measured on day 3 by the kinematic analysis (compare Figs. 2 and 4).
Role of Elongation Versus Cell Division Activity in Response to Salt Stress
Plant growth responses to environmental conditions have always intrigued physiologists. It is well known that adverse conditions inhibit root growth and that cell division and cell cycle regulation are involved in this response (Kurth et al., 1986
The cellular (Lagrangian) view considers individual cells as the regulatory units that determine the behavior of the organ as a whole. In this view growth is the result of the number of cells produced in the meristem per unit of time and the final length they reach at the end of the growth zone (Ivanov and Dubrovsky, 1997
As the cells in the salt stressed roots start to undergo rapid elongation closer to the root tip, salt stress appears to stimulate the transition from cell division to elongation, resulting in a shortened meristem and cells stopping division at a smaller size. A similar effect was seen in the cortical root cells of rice under salt stress (Samarajeewa et al., 1999
Besides a spatial aspect, the root axis also constitutes a time gradient representing the relative age of cells, as they are moving away from the root tip. Hence, the time to cross each region of the root represents the duration of the corresponding developmental stage for the constituent cells. The residence times for each cell in the meristem and the elongation zone do not differ significantly between salt stressed and control roots. This would support the hypothesis that a cell has a programmed duration both for division and subsequent elongation. A constant timing of elongation, but not division, was also observed in the primary root of Arabidopsis under different treatments (Beemster and Baskin, 1998
The kinematic analysis did not reveal an effect on cell cycle duration at day 3 after transfer to saline medium, indicating that at that time cell cycle progression is not inhibited. However, given the shortening of the meristem it is likely that cell cycle progression is most probably affected at earlier time points. It is shown that oxidative stress exerts its effect on the cell cycle shortly after the stress was imposed (Reichheld et al., 1999
B-type cyclins are good markers for cell proliferation as their expression patterns are specific to the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Hemerly et al., 1992
The kinetics of the CDK activity mirrored CYCB1;2 promoter activity. A strong correlation between kinase activity and cell division activity in response to different environmental conditions was also observed in maize leaves (Granier et al., 2000
The relative amount of CDKA and CDKB proteins was not affected by the stress, indicating that the protein level of CDKs is not limiting their activity. This is not surprising as in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cell suspension cultures it was shown that most of the CDKA protein is present in its inactive monomeric form (Porceddu et al., 2001
Analogous to the results presented here, Beemster et al. (1996) Moreover, our results emphasize the importance of taking into consideration the time of exposure to any treatment under investigation and distinguishing between the contribution of cell cycle timing and that of meristem size when analyzing the influence of environmental conditions upon cell division activity from an organ growth perspective.
Root Growth Conditions Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. ecotype Columbia (Col-0) were surface sterilized with 15% sodium hypochloride for 10 min, washed with sterile water and plated on 12 x 12-cm2 petri dishes containing 50 mL of agar-solidified culture medium. This medium contains 1x Murashige and Skoog micro- and macro-nutrient solution (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) supplemented with 0.1% Suc and 0.8% plant tissue culture agar (Lab M, Bury, UK). The plates were sealed with Urgopore tape (Laboratoire Urgo, Chenoves, France) and kept at 4°C for 1 d and then (= day 1) placed at an inclination of ±85° in a growth chamber under constant conditions (16-h/8-h photoperiod at 22°C and 80 µmol m1 s1 of light). On day 10 the seedlings were transferred to the same culture medium containing either 0.5% or no NaCl (Merck Eurolab, Leuven, Belgium), and immediately placed back in the same growth chamber (= day 0 after transfer).
Root elongation rates were determined by marking the bottom of the plate with a razor blade at the position of the root tip once a day at known times. Seven days after transfer to the NaCl-containing medium, the plates were scanned for imaging (Scanjet 4C/T; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA). From the digitized images the increase in the daily length was determined by measuring the distance between the successive marks along the root axis by using the SCIONIMAGE image analysis program (WinNT version beta3b; Scion, Frederick, MD). Average growth rate was calculated by dividing daily growth by the time interval between the corresponding marks.
Kinematic analysis of cell division and elongation was performed on day 3 after transfer using the methods described earlier (Beemster and Baskin, 2000
Directly after the time-lapse observation, the roots were mounted under a microscope (Axioscop, Zeiss) fitted with differential interference contrast optics. A series of overlapping images of all cortical cell files spanning the most apical 4 mm of the root was obtained. From these images, the distance from the base of the quiescent center to the tip of the root was determined and the length of all cortical cells was measured as a function of their position relative to the quiescent center [l(x)]. The combined data of all files were then also smoothed and interpolated into 25-µm spaced data points and subsequently converted into density (the inverse of the cell length). For nonsteady-state growth, additional measurements of cell length were made at day 1 and 5. The continuity equation (Silk and Erickson, 1979
in which the local cell flux F(x) is the rate at which cells pass at a given position in each file [F(x) = v(x)/l(x)]. The second factor, the local change in cell density over time, equals zero at steady-state growth as occurred in the roots under salt stress. Analogous to earlier analyses (Beemster and Baskin, 1998
Average cell division rate over the whole of the meristem (Dav) was then calculated by dividing Pav by the number of meristematic cells (cumulative number of cells at Xdiv). Finally the average cell cycle duration was determined as Tc = ln(2)/Dav.
Whole-mount GUS staining was performed on Arabidopsis transgenic plants, carrying the reporter construct pCYCB1;2::GUS (Donnelly et al., 1999
At 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 72 h after transfer the most apical 5-mm region of 200 to 250 root tips/treatment were harvested and immediately frozen in Eppendorf tubes cooled with liquid nitrogen. Thirty micrograms of total protein was isolated and analyzed according to the procedure described by De Veylder et al. (1997)
From the same samples as used for the kinase assay, 30 µg of total protein was suspended in 10 µL of SDS loading buffer, boiled, and subsequently separated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C+; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala). Filters were blocked overnight with 3% skimmed milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed three times for 15 min with PBS containing 0.5% Tween 20 (PBST). Subsequently, they were probed for 2 h with specific antibodies for CDKA;1 (1:5000 dilution) or CDKB1;1 (1:2500 dilution) in PBST and 3% skimmed milk. Then the filters were washed three times for 15 min with PBST and incubated for 2 h with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10000 dilution; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in PBST and 3% skimmed milk. The filters were washed three times for 15 min with PBST. Proteins were detected by chemiluminescence procedure (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL).
The authors thank Karel Spruyt for help with the images and the colleagues of the Plant Systems Biology department for insightful comments. Received January 30, 2004; returned for revision April 8, 2004; accepted April 10, 2004.
1 This work was supported by the Instituut voor de aanmoediging van Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie in Vlaanderen (predoctoral fellowship to G.W.), by grants from the Interuniversity Poles of Attraction Programme (Belgian State, Prime Minister's Office-Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs; P5/13), and by the European Commission Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources program (QLK5CT200101871). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.040022. * Corresponding author; e-mail dirk.inze{at}psb.ugent.be; fax 3293313909.
Barlow PW (1976) Towards an understanding of the behavior of root meristems. J Theor Biol 57: 433451[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Beemster GTS, Baskin TI (1998) Analysis of cell division and elongation underlying the developmental acceleration of root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 116: 515526
Beemster GTS, Baskin TI (2000) STUNTED PLANT 1 mediates effects of cytokinin, but not of auxin, on cell division and expansion in the root of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 124: 17181727
Beemster GT, De Vusser K, De Tavernier E, De Bock K, Inze D (2002) Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Plant Physiol 129: 854864 Beemster GTS, Fiorani F, Inzé D (2003) Cell cycle: the key to plant growth control? Trends Plant Sci 8: 154158[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Beemster GTS, Masle J, Williamson RE, Farquhar GD (1996) Effects of soil resistance to root penetration on leaf expansion in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): kinematic analysis of leaf elongation. J Exp Bot 47: 16631678 Bradford KJ, Trewavas AJ (1994) Sensitivity thresholds and variable time scales in plant hormone action. Plant Physiol 105: 10291036[Web of Science][Medline] Burssens S, Himanen K, van de Cotte B, Beeckman T, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Verbruggen N (2000) Expression of cell cycle regulatory genes and morphological alterations in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 211: 632640[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Cockcroft CE, den Boer BG, Healy JM, Murray JA (2000) Cyclin D control of growth rate in plants. Nature 405: 575579[CrossRef][Medline] Cooke TJ, Lu B (1992) The independence of cell shape and overall form in multicellular algae and land plants: cells do not act as building blocks for constructing plant organs. Int J Plant Sci 153: S7S27[CrossRef]
De Veylder L, Beeckman T, Beemster GTS, Krols L, Terras F, Landrieu I, Van Der Schueren E, Maes S, Naudts M, Inzé D (2001b) Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 16531667 De Veylder L, Beeckman T, Beemster GTS, de Almeida Engler J, Ormenese S, Maes S, Naudts M, Van Der Schueren E, Jacqmard A, Engler G, et al (2002) Control of proliferation, endoreduplication and differentiation by the Arabidopsis E2Fa-Dpa transcription factor. EMBO J 21: 13601368[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] De Veylder L, Beemster GTS, Beeckman T, Inzé D (2001a) CKS1At overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana inhibits growth by reducing meristem size and inhibiting cell-cycle progression. Plant J 25: 617626[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] De Veylder L, Joubès J, Inzé D (2003) Plant cell cycle transitions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 536543[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] De Veylder L, Segers G, Glab N, Casteels P, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1997) The Arabidopsis Cks1At protein binds to the cyclin-dependent kinases Cdc2aAt and Cdc2bAt. FEBS Lett 412: 446452[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Dewitte W, Murray JA (2003) The plant cell cycle. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 235264[CrossRef][Medline] Doerner P, Jorgensen J-E, You R, Steppuhn J, Lamb CJ (1996) Cyclin expression limits root growth and development. Nature 380: 520523[CrossRef][Medline] Dolan L, Janmaat K, Willemsen V, Linstead P, Poethig S, Roberts K, Scheres B (1993) Cellular organization of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Development 119: 7184[Abstract] Donnelly PM, Bonetta D, Tsukaya H, Dengler RE, Dengler NG (1999) Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Dev Biol 215: 407419[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ferreira P, Hemerly A, de Almeida Engler J, Bergounioux C, Burssens S, Van Montagu M, Engler G, Inzé D (1994a) Three discrete classes of Arabidopsis cyclins are expressed during different intervals of the cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1131311317
Ferreira PCG, Hemerly AS, de Almeida Engler J, Van Montagu M, Engler G, Inzé D (1994b) Developmental expression of the Arabidopsis cyclin gene cyc1At. Plant Cell 6: 17631774 Gandar PW (1980) The analysis of growth and cell production in root apices. Bot Gaz 141: 131138[CrossRef]
Granier C, Inzé D, Tardieu F (2000) Spatial distribution of cell division rate can be deduced from that of p34cdc2 kinase activity in maize leaves grown at contrasting temperatures and soil water conditions. Plant Physiol 124: 13931402 Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K, Bohnert HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51: 463499[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hemerly A, Bergounioux C, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Ferreira P (1992) Genes regulating the plant cell cycle: isolation of a mitotic-like cyclin from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 32953299 Huang CX, Van Steveninck RFM (1990) Salinity induced structural changes in meristematic cells of barley roots. New Phytol 115: 1722 Ivanov VB, Dubrovsky JG (1997) Estimation of the cell cycle duration in the root apical meristem: a model of linkage between cell cycle duration, rate of cell production and rate of root growth. Int J Plant Sci 158: 757763[CrossRef] Kaplan DR (1992) The relationship of cells to organisms in intact plants: problem and implications of an organismal perspective. Int J Plant Sci 153: S28S37[CrossRef]
Kurth E, Cramer GR, Lauchi A, Epstein E (1986) Effects of NaCl and CaCl2 on cell enlargement and cell production in cotton roots. Plant Physiol 82: 11021186 Logemann E, Wu S-C, Schröder J, Schmelzer E, Somssich IE, Hahlbrock K (1995) Gene activation by UV light, fungal elicitor or fungal infection in Petroselinum crispum is correlated with repression of cell cycle-related genes. Plant J 8: 865876[Web of Science][Medline]
Mironov V, De Veylder L, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1999) Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plants-The nexus. Plant Cell 11: 509521
Porceddu A, Stals H, Reichheld J-P, Segers G, De Veylder L, de Pinho Barrocco R, Casteels P, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Mironov V (2001) A plant-specific cyclin dependent kinase is involved in the control of G2/M progression in plants. J Biol Chem 276: 3635436360 Reichheld J-P, Vernoux T, Lardon F, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1999) Specific checkpoints regulate plant cell cycle progression in response to oxidative stress. Plant J 17: 647656[CrossRef][Web of Science] Russo AA, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP (1996) Structural basis of cyclin-dependent kinase activation by phosphorylation. Nat Struct Biol 3: 696700[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sacks MM, Silk WK, Burman P (1997) Effect of water stress on cortical cell division rates within the apical meristem of primary roots of maize. Plant Physiol 114: 519527[Abstract] Samarajeewa PK, Barrero RA, Umeda-Hara C, Kawai M, Uchimiya H (1999) Cortical cell death, cell proliferation, macromolecular movements and rTip1 expression patterns in roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under NaCl stress. Planta 207: 354361[CrossRef]
Schuppler U, He P-H, John PCL, Munns R (1998) Effect of water stress on cell division and cell-division-cycle 2-like cell-cycle kinase activity in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol 117: 667678
Shaul O, Mironov V, Burssens S, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1996) Two Arabidopsis cyclin promoters mediate distinctive transcriptional oscillation in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 48684872 Silk WK (1984) Quantitative descriptions of development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35: 479518 Silk WK, Erickson RO (1979) Kinematics of plant growth. J Theor Biol 76: 481501[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Solomon M, Gedalovich E, Mayer AM, PolJakoff-Mayber A (1986) Changes induced by salinity to the anatomy and morphology of excised pea roots in culture. Ann Bot 68: 4753
Sorrell DA, Menges M, Healy JMS, Deveaux Y, Amano C, Su Y, Nakagami H, Shinmyo A, Doonan JH, Sekine M, et al (2001) Cell cycle regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases in tobacco cultivar Bright Yellow-2 cells. Plant Physiol 126: 12141223
Vandepoele K, Raes J, De Veylder L, Rouzé P, Rombauts S, Inzé D (2002) Genome-wide analysis of core cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 903916 Wang H, Zhou Y, Gilmer S, Whitwill S, Fowke LC (2000) Expression of the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 affects cell division, plant growth and morphology. Plant J 24: 613623[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|