|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 6, 2004; 10.1104/pp.103.037929 Plant Physiology 135:2134-2149 (2004) © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Ethylene Production Is Responsible for Conifer Phloem Defense Responses and Reprogramming of Stem Cambial Zone for Traumatic Resin Duct FormationSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 991644236
Conifer stem pest resistance includes constitutive defenses that discourage invasion and inducible defenses, including phenolic and terpenoid resin synthesis. Recently, methyl jasmonate (MJ) was shown to induce conifer resin and phenolic defenses; however, it is not known if MJ is the direct effector or if there is a downstream signal. Exogenous applications of MJ, methyl salicylate, and ethylene were used to assess inducible defense signaling mechanisms in conifer stems. MJ and ethylene but not methyl salicylate caused enhanced phenolic synthesis in polyphenolic parenchyma cells, early sclereid lignification, and reprogramming of the cambial zone to form traumatic resin ducts in Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoiadendron giganteum. Similar responses in internodes above and below treated internodes indicate transport of a signal giving a systemic response. Studies focusing on P. menziesii showed MJ induced ethylene production earlier and 77-fold higher than wounding. Ethylene production was also induced in internodes above the MJ-treated internode. Pretreatment of P. menziesii stems with the ethylene response inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene inhibited MJ and wound responses. Wounding increased 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase protein, but MJ treatment produced a higher and more rapid ACC oxidase increase. ACC oxidase was most abundant in ray parenchyma cells, followed by cambial zone cells and resin duct epithelia. The data show these MJ-induced defense responses are mediated by ethylene. The cambial zone xylem mother cells are reprogrammed to differentiate into resin-secreting epithelial cells by an MJ-induced ethylene burst, whereas polyphenolic parenchyma cells are activated to increase polyphenol production. The results also indicate a central role of ray parenchyma in ethylene-induced defense.
Resistance in conifer stems to invasion by bark beetles, wood borers, and fungal pathogens includes constitutive defenses that deter initial invasion and inducible responses that may include mass oleoresin secretion and increased phenolic synthesis surrounding the wound zone following invasion. The bark (periderm and secondary phloem) is the first line of defense against stem-invading organisms and in many conifers contains basal levels of compartmentalized phenolic and terpenoid compounds. However, little is known about the activity of cells in the secondary phloem with respect to defense response mechanisms.
Polyphenolic parenchyma (PP) cells are a common component of the secondary phloem of all conifers and are active in the constitutive synthesis, storage, and modification of various phenolic compounds (Franceschi et al., 1998
Many, but not all, conifers also contain resin-producing structures in the secondary phloem or xylem as a constitutive defense (Langenheim, 2003
While there is considerable information about the anatomical and biochemical defenses in conifer stems, there is little known about the regulation of constitutive and inducible defenses. Recent work has shown that PP cell activation and TD development can be strongly elicited in the absence of wounding with exogenous treatments of methyl jasmonate (MJ) in the Pinaceae (Franceschi et al., 2002
A potential clue to the factors directly involved in TD formation may be inferred from the developmental features of these structures. TD formation occurs as a result of reprogramming of cambial cell derivatives that would normally develop into tracheids (Werker and Fahn, 1969
A link between jasmonates and ethylene has been shown in a number of systems (Farmer et al., 2003
Another phytohormone that needs to be considered with respect to PP cell activation and TD formation in conifers is salicylic acid (SA), a known mediator of the expression of various defense-related genes (Ryals et al., 1996
The purpose of this study was to determine if MJ directly induces PP cell activation and TD formation, as well as their systemic induction in untreated regions, or if it is an intermediate signaling compound. We used non-wounding exogenous applications of MJ, methyl salicylate (MS), and ethylene to assess stem responses in two diverse conifers: Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirbel Franco), which has constitutive resin ducts, and giant redwood (Sequoiadendron giganteum Lindl. Buchholz), which only produces TDs. Our results demonstrate that a major part of the MJ-induced response is due to increased ethylene production, and the sites of ethylene production are identified. The results are relevant to mechanisms of induced resistance in conifers, as previous studies have demonstrated that wounding or MJ pretreatment of mature Norway spruce stems induces these same responses and also confers local resistance to the bark beetle-vectored fungal pathogen, Ceratocystis polonica (Franceschi et al., 2002
Methyl Jasmonate and Ethylene Induce Resin Accumulation and Morphogenic Changes
Following application of MJ or ethylene to Douglas fir and giant redwood, resin accumulated on the bark of the treated internode of all the saplings within 21 d but never appeared on the bark of MS or control saplings (data not shown; see Hudgins et al., 2004
Normal anatomy of Douglas fir secondary phloem, as seen in cross-section, consists of sieve cells and associated albuminous cells, PP cells, radial ray parenchyma, and scattered radial resin ducts. In control tissue (Tween 20 and water), PP cells generally occurred as semicomplete tangential rows with 5 to 10 sieve cells between rows, though individual PP cells were occasionally scattered among the sieve cells (Fig. 1A). All PP cells contained small phenolic bodies. Twenty-eight days after treatment with MJ or ethylene, PP cells appeared in an activated stage (Franceschi et al., 2000
Following MJ treatments to Douglas fir saplings, a tangential row of large axial xylem TDs developed proximal to the cambium, and radial resin ducts in secondary phloem and xylem were activated to accumulate resin as indicated by expansion and increase in lumen size (Fig. 1B). The radial ducts of the secondary phloem were often seen to be connected with the induced xylem TDs (Fig. 1B). These same responses were found at all four internodes from which sections were collected, although the response was reduced in magnitude at both internodes above the treatment site (Fig. 4). Ethylene also induced xylem TDs, but the ducts were smaller than observed with MJ treatments (Figs. 1C and 3). Copper acetate staining indicated that induced axial and radial TDs contained resin acids (data not shown). Control treatments (Figs. 1A and 3) or MS (Figs. 1D and 3) did not induce axial or radial TDs. Stems of giant redwood have a considerably different anatomy than Douglas fir and do not normally produce resin ducts, which is why we chose it to compare responses to ethylene. The secondary phloem of giant redwood consist of a highly organized structure with the following tangential pattern: fiber cells followed by sieve cells, followed by PP cells, then sieve cells, and then another layer fiber cell to repeat the pattern (Fig. 2A). Tangential layers of mature (thickened) fibers occur in the secondary phloem layers older than 2 years, while the fiber walls appear weakly lignified in the first two layers near the cambium. MJ treatment strongly induced PP cell activation as seen by both swelling of PP cells and the accumulation of phenolics (Figs. 2B and 3). Early lignification of young fiber cells also occurred in response to MJ treatment (Fig. 2B). Ethylene treatment also strongly induced PP cell activation and lignification of fiber cells (Figs. 2C and 3), while MS had no apparent effect on PP cells or fiber lignification (Fig. 2D). Differences were significant at P < 0.05.
Some species of Pinaceae but no species of Taxodiaceae that have been studied produce constitutive axial xylem resin ducts (Hudgins et al., 2004
A differential dose response was observed with respect to TD size and numbers, and the amount of MJ applied to giant redwood and Douglas fir (Fig. 4). In both species, TD size generally increased with increasing MJ concentration in the treated internode as well as internodes immediately above and below the treatment site. For a given MJ concentration, the size of the TDs decreased moving from the treated internode to the internode immediately above, and then again to the second internode above. TD size also decreased in the internode below the treated internode. Previous studies showed that gaseous MJ alone was not able to penetrate the bark at a level that gave a response (Hudgins et al., 2004 A statistical analysis was done on the number (linear density in mm1) and size (area in µm2) of MJ-induced TDs at the internode below the treated internode (internode A), the treated internode (B), and both internodes above the treatment site (C and D; 10 and 20 cm above, respectively). In giant redwood, significant differences were found only between the number of induced TDs at internodes A, B, C, and D within 10 and 50 mM MJ treatments (P < 0.0001; Fig. 4A). Significant differences with 25 mM MJ were found at internodes A and C (P = 0.0037) and internodes C and D (P = 0.0037; Fig. 4A). For 100 mM MJ, the number of TDs was significant between internodes B and A (P = 0.0007), C (P = 0.0168), and D (P < 0.0001). Within each MJ concentration in giant redwood, TD lumen sizes also showed significant differences (P < 0.0001; Fig. 4B). In Douglas fir, significant differences occurred between the number of induced TDs at all internode locations except A and C with 10 mM MJ treatment (P = 0.3339), while with 25 mM MJ differences were found between internodes A and C (P = 0.0017), B and C (P < 0.0001), B and D (P = 0.006), and C and D (P = 0.0198; Fig. 4C). The number of induced TDs were not significantly different within 50 and 100 mM MJ treatments at internodes A, C, and D (P > 0.06 in all cases); however, internode B was significantly different from A (P = 0.011) at 50 mM MJ. Lumen sizes of the induced TDs in Douglas fir at 10 mM MJ treatment were significant between internodes A and B, B and D, and C and D (all P = 0.0372; Fig. 4D). For 25 mM MJ, significant differences were found between A and B (P = 0.0372), A and D, B and D, and C and D at P < 0.0001. With 50 mM MJ, significant differences were found between internodes A and B (P = 0.0002), C and D (P = 0.0025), B and C (P < 0.0001), B and D (P = 0.0001), and B and D (P < 0.0001). For 100 mM MJ treatments, significant differences (P < 0.0001) were found between all internodes except A and C (P = 0.81). Data on the number of TDs formed is somewhat misleading, especially with highest MJ concentration. This is because at high MJ concentrations the TDs were so large that they tended to inhibit formation of multiple smaller TDs, as occurs in internodes above or below the treated internode or with lower MJ (Fig. 4). This inverse relationship between TD size and number is purely due to physical restraints.
Exogenous MJ treatment on Douglas fir stems induced ethylene production at both the treated internode and the untreated internode above (Fig. 5). The response was rapid, with a 77-fold increase of ethylene at 6 h over wound-induced ethylene at the same time point (significant at P < 0.0001). In the treated internode, there was a decrease in ethylene production from 6 to 24 to 48 h after treatment. The ethylene production by the untreated internode peaked at 24 h, indicating a lag phase probably associated with transport of the signal from the treated internode. Although significantly lower, ethylene above control levels was detected at wounded internodes after 6 h and increased at 24 h, and remained at this level up to 48 h (Fig. 5). An ethylene signal was observed at the internode above the wound; however, it remained below the quantifiable limits of the calibration curve. Statistical analysis revealed MJ treatments were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) over wounding at all sample time points, but differences between the treated and untreated internodes at 24 (P = 0.131) and 48 h (P = 0.2211) with MJ treatments were not significantly different. Ethylene was not detected in internodes of the Tween 20-treated control trees.
The Ethylene Antagonist, 1-Methylcyclopropene, Reduces the MJ and Wound Response We sought to clarify and differentiate the role of MJ and ethylene by using 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) to inhibit the ethylene response in Douglas fir. As found previously, in the absence of 1-MCP, MJ-treated stems developed activated PP cells and a tangential band of xylem TD at the treated internode (Fig. 6A) and the internode directly above the treatment site (data not shown). In the presence of 1-MCP, only a few small scattered xylem TD were formed at the treated internode (Fig. 6B), and resin ducts were not formed at the internode above the treatment site. Quantitative analysis showed that 1-MCP reduced MJ-induced TD area to only 16% of that formed by MJ treatment without 1-MCP (908 ± 74 versus 5,850 ± 408 µm2/mm) in the treated internode, and no TDs were formed in the internode above the treated internode when 1-MCP was used. The TDs in Figure 6B are shown as an example of the anatomy of the few TDs formed in the presence of 1-MCP, and it must be noted that this picture represents a rarity, as in most of the stem no TDs could be found. However, PP cells did appear to be activated by MJ in the presence of 1-MCP (Fig. 6B), though it was not as extensive as in the absence of 1-MCP. Following wounding with a cork borer, a band of 10 to 15 phenolic filled cells and undifferentiated TDs formed in the xylem in a circumferential band some distance from the wound (Fig. 6, C and D). In saplings treated with 1-MCP and wounding, the same response only occurred directly below the wound and not in adjacent tissue (Fig. 6, E and F). Use of 1-MCP did not produce observable negative effects on growth of control saplings.
Expression and Localization of ACC Oxidase To determine which cells may be involved in the MJ-induced ethylene production, we used immunochemical techniques and an antibody to 1-aminocyclopropane-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase. Western immunoblots demonstrate that the antibody recognized ACC oxidase from Douglas fir, as indicated by a single band of the correct molecular mass of approximately 40 kD (Fig. 7). This enzyme is shown here to be constitutively expressed, as it is present in control tissue. The enzyme is also inducible; both wounding and MJ treatment results in an increase in the amount of protein (Fig. 7). A clear increase can be seen 96 h after wounding, whereas in MJ-treated plants, the increase can be seen at 6 and 48 h, with a subsequent decrease at 96 h after treatment (Fig. 7). These data are consistent with the data on ethylene production under similar treatments (Fig. 5).
Immunocytochemical localization demonstrated that ACC oxidase was most highly expressed within the cytoplasm of ray parenchyma cells of Douglas fir followed by cambial and PP cells (Fig. 8, AE). Label was also abundant in secretory epithelial cells of resin ducts, including secondary phloem radial resin ducts (Fig. 8F), cortical axial resin ducts (Fig. 8, G and H), and TD (data not shown). Some label was associated with the nucleus (Fig. 8, A and DG). The enzyme was present in control (Fig. 8E), wound (Fig. 8G), and MJ-treated (Fig. 8D) tissue, but the greatest amount of labeling occurred with wounding and MJ treatments. Labeling for ACC oxidase was associated with the cytoplasm and nucleus but not with the cell wall, vacuole, or other organelles. Nonimmune serum controls did not give any appreciable labeling of any cell type (Fig. 8C).
Constitutive phenolic and terpenoid compounds are important barriers to pests attacking the stems of conifers, but once compromised, additional defenses, some of which require extensive anatomical changes (Christiansen et al., 1999
A major site for phenolic-based defenses in conifer stems is found in the PP cells of the secondary phloem (Franceschi et al., 1998
Increased production of terpenoid resins is a well-known response to stem injury or MJ treatment of conifers (Bohlman and Croteau, 1999
In a study of Norway spruce cuttings, significant increases in ethylene occurred 6 h after wounding (Ingemarsson and Bollmark, 1997
There is conflicting information about the subcellular location of ACC oxidase. Various reports place it in the cell wall/apoplast (Rombaldi et al., 1994
A few investigations have shown a correlation between wounding, ethylene, and monoterpene accumulation in conifers (Peters, 1977
The similarity of responses to MJ and ethylene in the absence of wounding implies these compounds may both be directly involved in the inducible defense response pathway of conifers, similar to the genetically defined defense pathways of Arabidopsis (Pieterse et al., 1998
Our previous studies demonstrated that MJ or wounding can elicit a response in the untreated regions above or below the treated regions of mature trees or saplings (Franceschi et al., 2000
This study provides evidence for the activity of MJ and ethylene as key signaling compounds for inducible defense mechanisms and systemic defense involving the phenylpropanoid and terpenoid resin pathways in conifers. This up-regulation parallels at least part of the wound response that is seen in a number of conifers following abiotic or biotic injury and is relevant to acquired resistance against bark beetles and pathogenic fungi. Interestingly, exogenous MJ, ethylene, or MS applications did not induce lesion formation or characteristic tissue damage associated with a hypersensitive response, which implies that other signaling agents are required for the establishment of necrotic tissue and the necrophylactic periderm. When taken together, the data on exogenous ethylene induction of anatomical defense responses, MJ induction of ethylene synthesis and ACC oxidase protein, and 1-MCP inhibition of these responses provide a strong case for ethylene as the immediate signal for PP cell activation and cambial zone reprogramming for TD formation. These studies provide valuable new information on defense response mechanisms and experimental approaches for further work to resolve the signaling and signal transduction pathways of inducible defenses in conifer stems.
Plant Materials and Greenhouse Conditions Four-year-old Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and giant redwood (Sequoiadendron giganteum) saplings from a commercial nursery (Forest Farm, Williams, OR) were grown in a Washington State University-Pullman greenhouse. They were approximately 1 m in height, with a diameter of 1.5 to 2.0 cm at the first internode. Saplings were grown in 3-L containers at 23°C day and 18°C night temperatures, under a 14-h-light/10-h-dark regime for 3 months prior to treatments. They received 500 mL of water daily and fertilizer weekly [Peters fertilizer (20:20:20 N:P:K); Scotts Horticulture, Marysville, OH].
On April 26, 2002, three replicate saplings of each species were treated with 10, 25, 50, or 100 mM MJ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis; provided by Dr. J. Gershenzon) in Millipore (Billerica, MA) Nanopure water with 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (Fischer Biotech, Fairlawn, NJ), or 10, 25, 50, or 100 mM MS (Sigma-Aldrich) in water with 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20. Three control trees from each species were treated with 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 in water. The solutions were applied evenly around the second internode using a small brush and repeated after 5 min to ensure a uniform coating. A small rubber tube was tightened around the bottom of all treated internodes to ensure fluid did not reach the lower untreated internode. Tween 20 is a biologically nonactive detergent used to emulsify MJ and MS and to act as a surfactant to evenly spread the solution on the bark surface (Franceschi et al., 2002
Three saplings of each species were treated with exogenous application of an Ethaphon (Carolina Biological, Burlington, NC) solution, and three received water (control). Ethaphon releases ethylene in the presence of water. At the first internode of all trees, a 5-cm length of stem was wrapped with thin cheesecloth and then wrapped twice with plastic (Saran Wrap: polyvinylidene chloride). Rubber bands were cut and tensioned over the plastic wrap at both ends to create a tight seal without injuring the stem. Ethylene treatments were applied by injecting 5 mL of Ethapon:water solution (1:1, v/v) under the plastic wrap with a small gauge hypodermic needle. Following application, the treated area was wrapped a second time with plastic. Saplings were treated for 12 h, and the apparatus was then removed. Control (water) treatments used the same method. Stem samples were taken 28 d after treatment and were prepared for microscopy as described below.
To examine the potential role of ethylene as a downstream signaling agent from MJ, nine saplings of Douglas fir (three replicates of each of three treatments) were exposed to the ethylene response inhibitor 1-MCP (EthylBloc; Rohm & Haas, Philadelphia) prior to subsequent treatments. Three groups of three saplings were treated separately and sequentially in a sealed 225-L Plexiglas growth chamber. Each group of three saplings was first exposed to 1-MCP at 9 ppm for 12 h, and then the three saplings from each group were treated with Tween 20 (control), 100 mM MJ, or a 5-mm cork borer wound into the sapwood. Along with the treatment, a second dose of 1-MCP of the same concentration was released in the container, and after an additional 12 h of exposure the plants were transferred to a greenhouse. Control, MJ, and wound treatments were conducted independently to exclude volatile effects from wound-induced ethylene or volatile MJ. Identical treatments (Tween 20, MJ, wounding; three saplings for each) were conducted in the absence of 1-MCP as controls. Three weeks after treatment, samples from the first through third internode of each plant were prepared for microscopy as described below.
Twenty-seven Douglas fir saplings were treated with 100 mM MJ in 0.1% Tween 20 (9 trees), 0.1% Tween 20 (9 trees), or wounded twice with a 2-mm cork borer (9 trees) around the stem along a 6-cm length of the first internode. Two 6-cm intact stem sections from each treatment were collected at 6, 24, and 48 h at the first and second internodes, and from three replicate-treated saplings at each time point. Needles were removed from stem sections; the sections were weighed and placed individually in a 10-mL glass vial with a rubber septum stopper. Following incubation times of 2 or 4 h at 22°C, 0.5 cm3 gas samples were drawn from the head space with a tuberculin syringe and injected into a Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC-MS (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) with a J&W Scientific CARBONPLT column (30 m x 0.53 mm; Folsom, CA) and a flame ionization detector. Chromatography was conducted with a prepurified nitrogen gas flow adjusted to 8 mL/min. Injector/detector and oven temperatures were set at 150°C and 200°C, respectively. Ethylene production was determined as nL [g fresh weight (FW) x h]1. Following sampling, distilled water was added to vials with tissue to determine total vial gas volume.
Twenty-seven Douglas fir stems were treated as described above for ethylene analysis. Three saplings were collected following each treatment at 6, 48, and 96 h. Stem secondary phloem and cambial zone tissue was separated from the xylem, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80°C. Protein extractions were conducted as described previously by Martin et al. (2002)
Copper Acetate Resin Staining
Intact stem section samples (3 cm) were collected and directly placed in fixative solution [2% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and 1.25% (v/v) glutaraldehyde buffered in 50 mM L-piperazine-N-N'-bis (2-ethane sulfonic) acid, pH 7.2]. Each sample was subsequently cut into 2.5-mm2 blocks and allowed to fix for 24 h at 4°C. Blocks were subsampled and rinsed with the same buffer solution, dehydrated with an ethanol series, and infiltrated with L.R. White acrylic resin (London Resin, Reading, UK). Samples were polymerized in fresh resin at 62°C for 12 h.
General Anatomy Staining
Scion Image 1.62 imaging software (Scion, Frederick, MD; www.scioncorp.com) was used to make measurements of PP cells and TD from stem cross-sections of each of three replicate saplings for each treatment. The cross-sectional areas of PP cells and their polyphenolic inclusions were measured, whereas both the number of TDs and their cross-sectional areas were determined. Forty to 50 PP cells per section were measured from three different sections and combined to represent one treated internode per sapling. Eight to 10 TDs per section were measured from three different sections and combined to represent a treated internode per sapling. For statistical analysis, data was calculated based on combined averages from three individual saplings (n = 3).
Stem section tissue was collected from MJ-, wound-, and control (water)-treated Douglas fir following treatments at 6 and 96 h for immunocytochemical comparison with western-blot analysis. Tissue was fixed and embedded in L.R. White as described above and was sectioned at 1 µm. Tissue was first blocked for nonspecific binding of antibodies by incubation for 1 h in TBST + BSA containing 0.05% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (10,000 molecular weight). Sections were incubated for 4 h at room temperature with goat anti-Arabidopsis ACC oxidase polyclonal antibody diluted 1:75 in TBST + BSA. Following incubation with the primary antibody, the sections were rinsed with TBST + BSA (4 x 15 min) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with rabbit anti-goat gold-tagged secondary antibody diluted 1:150 with TBST + BSA. After sequential rinsing with TBST + BSA, TBST, and distilled water, the sections were silver enhanced (Amersham Silver Enhancement kit; Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, UK) and counter-stained with 0.5% (w/v) aqueous Safranin O. The sections were coverslipped with immersion oil as a mounting media and imaged with a confocal microscope (Bio-Rad 1024), using a combination of reflected and transmitted imaging.
All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) with significance judged at P < 0.05 in all cases. Dose-response studies were treated as two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a completely randomized design with protected LSD to compare number of resin ducts and internode location within each MJ concentration. The same analysis was conducted to compare resin duct lumen size and internode location within each MJ concentration. Natural log transformation was performed on the number of ducts because of nonhomogeneous variances among treatment concentrations. For phenolic area, one-way ANOVA in a completely randomized design with protected LSD was used to compare differences among treatment means. For effect of various compounds on giant redwood, resin duct area and number of resin ducts were analyzed by two sample t tests because water, Tween 20, and MS treatments had zero resin ducts. Satterthwaite adjustments were made to the t test due to unequal variances between ethylene and MJ treatment groups. For effect of various compounds on Douglas fir, analysis of resin duct area and number of resin ducts were performed with one-way ANOVA in a completely randomized design with protected LSD to compare between treatment groups. Ethylene production studies following control, wound, and MJ application were treated as two-way ANOVA in a completely randomized design with protected LSD to compare internode location at 6, 24, and 48 h time points.
We thank Dr. J. Gershenzon (Max Planck Institute of Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany) for the generous supply of MJ, Dr. J. Fellman, Ines Müller, and Greg Hoffman (Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University) for use of equipment and technical assistance with GC analyses, and Dr. E. Christiansen (Skogforsk, Aas, Norway) and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments on the manuscript. Confocal microscopy was done in the Electron Microscopy Center, Washington State University. Dr. R. Alldredge (Department of Statistics, Washington State University) provided consultation for the statistical analysis. This work was conducted as part of an international scientific study on conifer defense mechanisms (CONDEF). Received December 17, 2003; returned for revision April 17, 2004; accepted April 19, 2004.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.037929. * Corresponding author; e-mail vfrances{at}mail.wsu.edu; fax 5093353184.
Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME (1992) Ethylene in Plant Biology, Ed 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 2655 Alfaro RI (1995) An induced defense reaction in white spruce to attack by the white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi). Can J For Res 25: 17251730[CrossRef] Andersson-Gunneras S, Hellgren JM, Bjorklund S, Regan S, Moritz T, Sundberg B (2003) Asymmetric expression of a poplar ACC oxidase controls ethylene production during gravitational induction of tension wood. Plant J 34: 339349[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bannan MW (1936) Vertical resin ducts in the secondary wood of the Abietineae. New Phytol 35: 1146 Barker JE (1979) Growth and wood properties of Pinus radiata in relation to applied ethylene. N Z J For Sci 9: 1519 Bleecker AB, Kende H (2000) Ethylene: a gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16: 118[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bohlman J, Croteau R (1999) Diversity and variability of terpenoid defenses in conifers: molecular genetics, biochemistry and evolution of the terpene synthase gene family in grand fir (Abies grandis). In DJ Chadwick, JA Goode, eds, Insect Plant Interactions and Induced Plant Defense. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, UK, pp 132146 Bois E, Lieutier F (1997) Phenolic response of Scots pine clones to inoculation with Leptographium wingfieldii, a fungus associated with Tomicus piniperda. Plant Physiol Biochem 35: 819825 Boller T (1991) Ethylene in pathogenesis and disease resistance. In AK Mattoo, JC Suttle, eds, The Plant Hormone Ethylene. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 293314 Bonello P, Storer AJ, Gordon TR, Wood DL (2003) Systemic effects of Heterobasidion annosum on ferulic acid glucoside and lignin of presymptomatic ponderosa pine phloem, and potential effects on bark-beetle-associated fungi. J Chem Ecol 29: 11671182[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bostock RM (1998) Signal conflicts and synergies in induced resistance to multiple attackers. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55: 99109[CrossRef] Brignolas F, Lacroix B, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Drouet A, Claudot A-C, Yart A, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (1995) Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiol 109: 821827[Abstract]
Brock TG, Maydanski E, McNish RW, Peters-Golden M (2001) Co-localization of leukotriene A(4) hydrolase with 5-lipoxygenase in nuclei of alveolar macrophages and rat basophilic leukemia cells but not neutrophils. J Biol Chem 276: 3507135077 Cano-Delgado A, Penfield S, Smith C, Catley M, Bevan M (2003) Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 34: 351362[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Cheong JJ, Choi YD (2003) Methyl jasmonate as a vital substance in plants. Trends Genet 19: 409413[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Christiansen E, Franceschi VR, Nagy NE, Krekling T, Berryman AA, Krokene P, Solheim H (1999) Traumatic resin duct formation in Norway spruce after wounding or infection with a bark beetle associated blue-stain fungus Ceratocystis polonica. In F Lieuter, WJ Mattson, MR Wagner, eds, Physiology and Genetics of Tree-Phytophage Interactions. Les Colloques De I'INRA, INRA Editions, Versailles, France, pp 7789
Chung MC, Chou SJ, Kuang LY, Charng YY, Yang SF (2002) Subcellular localization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase in apple fruit. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 549554 Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 355381[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Davis JM, Wu H, Cooke JEK, Reed J, Luce KS, Michler CH (2002) Pathogen challenge, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid regulate expression of chitinase gene homologs in pine. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15: 380387[Medline] Del Cerro M, Cogen J, Del Cerro C (1980) Stevenel's blue, an excellent stain for optical microscopical study of plastic embedded tissue. Microsc Acta 83: 117121[Web of Science][Medline] Dolan L (1997) The role of ethylene in the development of plant form. J Exp Bot 48: 201210 Durner J, Shah J, Klessig DF (1997) Salicylic acid and disease resistance in plants. Trends Plant Sci 7: 266274[CrossRef] Du S, Yamamoto F (2003) Ethylene evolution changes in the stems of Metasequoia glyptostroboides and Aesculus turbinata seedlings in relation to gravity-induced reaction wood formation. Trees (Berl) 17: 522528 Eklund L (1990) Endogenous levels of oxygen, carbon dioxide and ethylene in stems of Norway spruce trees during one growing season. Trees (Berl) 4: 150154 Eklund L (1991) Hormone levels in the cambial region of Picea abies during the onset of cambial activity. Physiol Plant 82: 385388[CrossRef] Eklund L, Little CHA (1995) Interaction between indole-3-acetic acid and ethylene in the control of tracheid production in detached shoots of Abies balsamea. Tree Physiol 15: 2734[Medline] Eklund L, Little CHA (1996) Laterally applied Ethrel causes local increases in radial growth and indole-3-acetic acid concentration in Abies balsamea shoots. Tree Physiol 16: 509513 Eklund L, Little CHA (1998) Ethylene evolution, radial growth and carbohydrate concentrations in Abies balsamea shoots ringed with Ethrel. Tree Physiol 18: 383391 Everard JD, Franceschi VR, Loescher WH (1993) Mannose 6-phosphate reductase, a key enzyme in photoassimilate partitioning, is abundant and located in the cytoplasm of photosynthetically active cells of celery (Apium graveolens L.) source leaves. Plant Physiol 102: 345356[Abstract] Fahn A, Werker E, Ben-Zur P (1979) Seasonal effects of wounding and growth substances on development of traumatic resin ducts in Cedrus libani. New Phytol 82: 537544 Fäldt J, Martin D, Miller B, Rawat S, Bohlmann J (2003) Traumatic resin defense in Norway spruce (Picea abies): methyl jasmonate-induced terpene synthase gene expression, and cDNA cloning and functional characterization of (+)-3-carene synthase. Plant Mol Biol 51: 119133[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Fan X, Mattheis JP, Fellman JK (1998) A role for jasmonates in climacteric fruit ripening. Planta 204: 444449[CrossRef][Web of Science] Farmer EE, Almeras E, Krishnamurthy V (2003) Jasmonates and related oxylipins in plant responses to pathogenesis and herbivory. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 372378[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (1998) Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important site of defense reactions. Am J Bot 85: 601615[Abstract]
Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Krekling T, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (2000) Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distant defense responses to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 87: 314326
Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2002) Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies (Pinaceae) stems induces defense-related responses in phloem and xylem. Am J Bot 89: 578586 Franich RA, Carson MJ, Carson SD (1986) Synthesis and accumulation of benzoic acid in Pinus radiata needles in response to tissue-injury by dothistromin and correlation with resistance of Pinus radiata families to Dothistroma pini. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 28: 267286 Gomez-Jimenez MD, Garcia-Olivares E, Matilla AJ (2001) 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase from embryonic axes of germinating chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds: cellular immunolocalization and alterations in its expression by indole-3-acetic acid, abscisic acid and spermine. Seed Sci Res 11: 243253 Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR (2003a) Methyl jasmonate induces changes mimicking anatomical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae. Tree Physiol 23: 361371 Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR (2004) Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic treatment. Tree Physiol 24: 251264 Hudgins JW, Krekling T, Franceschi VR (2003b) Distribution of calcium oxalate crystals in the secondary phloem of conifers: a constitutive defense mechanism? New Phytol 159: 677690[CrossRef] Ievinsh G, Dreibante G, Kruzmane D (2001) Changes of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase activity in stressed Pinus sylvestris needles. Biol Plant 44: 233237[CrossRef] Ievinsh G, Tillberg E (1995) Stress-induced ethylene biosynthesis in pine needles: a search for the putative 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid-independent pathway. J Plant Physiol 145: 308314[Web of Science] Ingemarsson BS, Bollmark M (1997) Ethylene production and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid turnover in Picea abies hypocotyls after wounding. J Plant Physiol 151: 711715[Web of Science] Ingemarsson BS, Lundqvist ME, Eliasson L (1991) Seasonal variation in ethylene concentration in the wood of Pinus sylvestris L. Tree Physiol 8: 273279 Janakowski S, Golinowski W (2000) Sclerification in the bark tissues of common fir (Abies alba Mill.). Acta Soc Bot Pol 69: 1120 Johnson PR, Ecker JR (1998) The ethylene gas signal transduction pathway: a molecular perspective. Annu Rev Genet 32: 227254[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Katoh S, Croteau R (1997) Individual variation in constitutive and induced monoterpene biosynthesis in grand fir. Phytochemistry 47: 577582[CrossRef] Kende H (1993) Ethylene biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 283307[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Kim YS, Choi D, Lee MM, Lee SH, Kim WT (1998) Biotic and abiotic stress-related expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family in Nicotiana glutinosa L. Plant Cell Physiol 39: 565573 Klintborg A, Eklund L, Little CHA (2002) Ethylene metabolism in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) shoots during the year. Tree Physiol 22: 5966 Kozlowski G, Metraux JP (1998) Infection of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings with Pythium irregulare Buism. and Pythium ultimum Trow.: histological and biochemical responses. Eur J Plant Pathol 104: 225234[CrossRef] Kozlowski GA, Buchala A, Metraux JP (1999) Methyl jasmonate protects Norway spruce [Picea abies (L) Karst.] seedlings against Pythium ultimum Trow. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55: 5358 Krekling T, Franceschi VR, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (2000) The structure and development of polyphenolic parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Picea abies) bark. Flora 195: 354369[Web of Science] Krekling T, Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Solheim H (2004) Differential anatomical response of Norway spruce stem tissues to sterile and fungus infected inoculations. Trees (Berl) 18: 19 Krokene P, Solheim H, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2003) Inducible anatomical defense responses in Norway spruce stems and their possible role in induced resistance. Tree Physiol 23: 191197 Kusumoto D, Suzuki K (2001) Induction of traumatic resin canals in Cupressaceae by ethrel application. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 47: 16 Kusumoto D, Suzuki K (2003) Spatial distribution and time-course of polyphenol accumulation as a defense response induced by wounding in the phloem of Chamaecyparis obtuse. New Phytol 10: 14691481 Lachaud S, Catesson AM, Bonnemain JL (1999) Structure and functions of the vascular cambium. C R Acad Sci Ser III 322: 633650[Medline] Langenheim JH (2003) Plant Resins: Chemistry, Evolution, Ecology, and Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Portland, OR
Lee JH, Kim WT (2003) Molecular and biochemical characterization of VR-EILs encoding Mung bean ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE proteins. Plant Physiol 132: 14751488 Lev-Yadun S, Aloni R (1995) Differentiation of the ray system in woody-plants. Bot Rev 61: 4584 Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Brignolas F, Picron V, Yart A, Bastien C, Jay-Allemand C (1996) Changes in phenolic metabolites of Scots pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-cilatum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Eur J For Pathol 26: 145158 Little CHA, Eklund L (1999) Ethylene in relation to compression wood formation in Abies balsamea shoots. Trees (Berl) 13: 173177[CrossRef] Little CHA, Pharis RP (1995) Hormonal control of radial and longitudinal growth in the tree stem. In BL Gartner, ed, Plant Stems: Physiology and Functional Morphology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 281319
Martin D, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J (2003) Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol 132: 15861599
Martin D, Tholl D, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J (2002) Methyl jasmonate induces traumatic resin ducts, terpenoid resin biosynthesis, and terpenoid accumulation in developing xylem of Norway spruce stems. Plant Physiol 129: 10031018 McDowell JM, Dangl JL (2000) Signal transduction in the plant immune response. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 7982[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
McKay SAB, Hunter WL, Godard K-A, Wang SW, Martin DM, Bohlmann J, Plant AL (2003) Insect attack and wounding induce traumatic resin duct development and gene expression of ()-pinene synthase in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol 133: 368378
Mueller MJ, Wilhelm B, Spannagl E, Meinhart HZ (1993) Signaling in the elicitation process is meditated through the octadecanoid pathway leading to jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 74907494
Nagy NE, Franceschi VR, Solheim H, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2000) Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits. Am J Bot 87: 302313 Nicholson RL, Hammerschmidt R (1992) Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30: 369389[Web of Science]
O'Donnell PJ, Calvert C, Atzorn R, Wasternack C, Leyser HMO, Bowles DJ (1996) Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 274: 19141917 Ohta M, Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H (2000) Three ethylene-responsive transcription factors in tobacco with distinct transactivation functions. Plant J 22: 2938[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] O'Neill SD, Nadeau JA, Zhang XS, Bui AQ, Halevy AH (1993) Interorgan regulation of ethylene biosynthetic genes by pollination. Plant Cell 5: 419432[Abstract] Orbea A, Fahimi HD, Cajaraville MP (2000) Immunolocalization of four antioxidant enzymes in digestive glands of mollusks and crustaceans and fish liver. Histochem Cell Biol 114: 393404[Medline]
Penninckx IAMA, Thomma BPHJ, Buchala A, Metraux J-P, Broekaert W (1998) Concomitant activation of jasmonate and ethylene response pathways is required for induction of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10: 21032113 Peters WJ (1977) Ethrel-bipyridilium synergism in slash pine. In Proceedings of the Fourth Lightwood Research Coordinating Council, Annual Meeting, January 1819, 1977. Energy Research and Development Program, pp 7883 Phillips MA, Croteau R (1999) Resin-based defenses in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 5: 184190
Pieterse CMJ, van Wees SCM, van Pelt JA, Knoester M, Laan R, Gerrits H, Weisbeek PJ, van Loon LC (1998) A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10: 15711580
Plomion C, Pionneau C, Brach J, Costa P, Bailleres H (2000) Compression wood-responsive proteins in developing xylem of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Plant Physiol 123: 959969 Popp M, Johnson JD, Lesney M (1995) Changes in ethylene production and monoterpene concentration in slash pine and loblolly pine following inoculation with bark beetle vectored fungi. Tree Physiol 15: 807812 Popp MP, Lesney MS, Davis JM (1997) Defense responses elicited in pine cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 47: 199206
Ramassamy S, Olmos E, Bouzayen M, Pech JC, Latche A (1998) 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase of apple fruit is periplasmic. J Exp Bot 49: 19091915 Reid RW, Whitney HS, Watson JA (1967) Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungus. Can J Bot 45: 11151126
Richard S, Drevet C, Jouanin L, Seguin A (2000) Induction of chalcone synthase expression in white spruce by wounding and jasmonate. Plant Cell Physiol 41: 982987 Rombaldi C, Lelievre JM, Latche A, Petitprez M, Bouzayen M, Pech JC (1994) Immunocytolocalization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase in tomato and apple fruit. Planta 192: 453460[Web of Science][Medline] Ruel JJ, Ayres MP, Lorio PL (1998) Loblolly pine responds to mechanical wounding with increased resin flow. Can J For Res 28: 596602[CrossRef] Ryals JA, Neuenschwander UH, Willits MG, Molina A, Steiner HY, Hunt MD (1996) Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 8: 18091819[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Saniewski M (1997) The role of jasmonates in ethylene biosynthesis. In AK Kanellis, C Chang, H Kende, D Grierson, eds, Biology and Biotechnology of the Plant Hormone Ethylene. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NATO ASI Series, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 3945 Savidge RA (2001) Intrinsic regulation of cambial growth. J Plant Growth Regul 20: 5277[CrossRef] Schultz TP, Boldin WD, Fischer TH, Nicholas DD, McMurtrey KD, Pobanz K (1992) Structure-fungicidal properties of some 3- and 4-hydroxylated stilbenes and bibenzyl analogues. Phytochemistry 31: 38013806[CrossRef] Seregelyes C, Mustardy L, Ayaydin F, Sass L, Kovacs L, Endre G, Lukacs N, Kovacs I, Vass I, Kiss GB, et al (2000) Nuclear localization of a hypoxia-inducible novel non-symbiotic hemoglobin in cultured alfalfa cells. FEBS Lett 482: 125130[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Shibata K, Abe S, Yoneda M, Davies E (2002) Sub-cellular distribution and isotypes of a 49-kDa apyrase from Pisum sativum. Plant Physiol Biochem 40: 407415[CrossRef][Web of Science] Sticher L, Mauch-Mani B, Metraux J-P (1997) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 35: 235270[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Telewski FW, Jaffe MJ (1986) Thigmomorphogenesis: the role of ethylene in the response of Pinus taeda and Abies fraseri to mechanical perturbation. Physiol Plant 66: 227233[CrossRef][Medline]
Telewski FW, Wakefield AH, Jaffe MJ (1983) Computer-assisted image analysis of tissues of ethrel-treated Pinus taeda seedlings. Plant Physiol 72: 177181 Tomlin ES, Alfaro RI, Borden JH, He F (1998) Histological response of resistant and susceptible white spruce to simulated white pine weevil damage. Tree Physiol 18: 2128 Trapp S, Croteau R (2001) Defensive resin biosynthesis in conifers. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 689724[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Vance CP, Kirk TK, Sherwood RT (1980) Lignification as a mechanism of disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 18: 259288[CrossRef][Web of Science] Viiri H, Annila E, Kitunen V, Niemelia P (2001) Induced responses in stilbenes and terpenes in fertilized Norway spruce after inoculation with blue-stain fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Trees (Berl) 15: 112122[CrossRef] Watanabe T, Sakai S (1998) Effects of active oxygen species and methyl jasmonate on expression of the gene for a wound-inducible 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in winter squash (Cucurbita maxima). Planta 206: 570576[CrossRef] Werker E, Fahn A (1969) Resin ducts of Pinus halepensis Mill. their structure, development and pattern of arrangement. Bot J Linn Soc 62: 379411[CrossRef] Wu H, Hu Z (1997) Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees (Berl) 11: 135143 Xu Y, Chang PFL, Liu D, Narasimhan ML, Raghothama KG, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (1994) Plant defense genes are synergistically induced by ethylene and methyl jasmonate. Plant Cell 6: 10771085[Abstract]
Yamamoto F, Kozlowski TT (1987) Effects of flooding, tilting of stems, and Ethrel application on growth, stem anatomy and ethylene production of Pinus densiflora seedlings. J Exp Bot 38: 293310 Yanez AJ, Bertinat R, Concha II, Slebe JC (2003) Nuclear localization of liver FBPase isoenzyme in kidney and liver. FEBS Lett 550: 3540[Medline] van Loon LC, Pierpoint WS, Boller T, Conejero V (1994) Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis related proteins. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12: 245264[CrossRef] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|