| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 136:2463-2474 (2004) © 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Weeds, Worms, and More. Papain's Long-Lost Cousin, Phytochelatin Synthase1,2Plant Science Institute, Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 (P.A.R., O.K.V.); and School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom (D.J.R.)
This Update is concerned with the mechanism of synthesis of heavy metal-binding thiol peptides, phytochelatins (PCs), by the enzyme PC synthase (EC 2.3.2.15). The bulk of the considerations in this review centers on what has been learned recently of the fundamental mechanics of PC synthesis, the domain organization and phylogenetic distribution of PC synthases, and PC synthase-like enzymes, and what this tells us about the chemistry underlying and the enzyme residues necessary for PC synthesis. It was decided to prepare a review of this type rather than aim at a more comprehensive treatment of heavy metal homeostasis and detoxification in plants for two reasons. The first is that there are already several contemporary reviews dealing with the more global aspects of plant heavy metal physiology. Excellent examples are Cobbett (2000)
Heavy metals, metals whose densities exceed 5 g/cm3 (Elmsley, 2001  ), come in two varieties—those that are and those that are not essential to organisms. Essential heavy metals, such as copper and zinc, are required as cofactors in redox reactions and ligand interactions, as well as for charge stabilization, charge shielding, and water ionization during biocatalysis (Elmsley, 2001; Voet and Voet, 2004). Nonessential heavy metals, such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury, are not required as cofactors, but instead interfere with those that are and/or simulate the effects of supraoptimal levels of essential heavy metals.
Despite a huge literature on the environmental, veterinary, and clinical phenomenology of heavy metal toxicity, its mechanistic basis is not well understood and has seldom been addressed directly. Notwithstanding this lack of precise details, in most cases, the consensus is that supraoptimal levels of essential heavy metals, and trace or higher levels of nonessential heavy metals, undergo aberrant capping reactions with the thiol groups of proteins and some thiol-containing coenzymes, displace endogenous metal cofactors (heavy or otherwise) from their cellular binding sites, and promote the formation of active oxygen species (Stadtmann, 1993
The inherent reactivity of heavy metals toward thiol groups is not only a major factor in their toxicity, but also a common thread in their homeostasis and detoxification. Indeed, this is the crux of the action of PCs and their immediate precursors, glutathione (GSH) and its derivatives. The tripeptide GSH (  -Glu-Cys-Gly) and in some species, such as legumes, its variant homoglutathione, h-GSH (-Glu-Cys- -Ala), are considered to influence the form and toxicity of heavy metals in several ways. These include direct metal binding, promotion of the transfer of heavy metals to other ligands, such as metallothioneins and/or PCs (Freedman et al., 1989), removal of active oxygen species formed as a result of the exposure of cells to heavy metals (Inzé and Van Montagu, 1995), and/or the formation of transport-active metal complexes (Li et al., 1997). First discovered in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and originally termed cadystins (Kondo et al., 1984), PCs, long-chain GSH derivatives (poly-[-Glu-Cys]n-Xaa polymers), are thought to serve a similar function by mediating the high-affinity binding and promoting the vacuolar sequestration of heavy metals. PC-dependent vacuolar Cd2+ sequestration is perhaps best understood in S. pombe, in which the hmt1+ gene product, a half-molecule ATP-binding cassette transporter, contributes to the transport of cadmium-PC complexes (Cd.PCs) and apo-PCs from the cytosol into the vacuole at the expense of ATP (Ortiz et al., 1992, 1995).
All known PCs fall into five main classes. These are canonical PCs (Fig. 1
), homo-PCs [iso(PC)(
The strongly nucleophilic sulfhydryl groups of the Cys substituents of PCs and their immediate precursors confer on these compounds the capacity to react with a broad spectrum of agents, ranging from free radicals, active oxygen species, and cytotoxic electrophilic organic xenobiotics to heavy metals (Rabenstein, 1989 ). Their N-terminal and downstream -peptidyl bonds, on the other hand, probably serve to protect these thiol peptides from general protease action, except when salvage is to be initiated through the specific action of -glutamyltranspeptidases. Contrary to what might be anticipated from the context in which they are found, -peptidyl bonds do not appear to be an essential prerequisite for high-affinity metal binding in that (EC)nG and (EC)nG peptides have indistinguishable Cd2+-binding properties (Satofuka et al., 2001).
PC synthases catalyze the net synthesis of PCs from GSH, from GSH and previously synthesized PCs, or from previously synthesized PCs to generate polymers containing 2 to 11 -Glu-Cys repeats. Although it is now almost a decade and a half since pioneering investigations by Meinhardt Zenk, Erwin Grill, and colleagues yielded partially purified preparations of an enzyme capable of catalyzing these reactions (Grill et al., 1989), it is only in the last several years that its molecular identity has been determined by the independent cloning and characterization of genes encoding PC synthases (Clemens et al., 1999; Ha et al., 1999; Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). Originally isolated from Arabidopsis, S. pombe, and wheat (Triticum aestivum), these genes (designated AtPCS1, SpPCS, and TaPCS1, respectively) encode 50- to 55-kD polypeptides bearing 40% to 50% sequence similarity to each other (Clemens et al., 1999; Ha et al., 1999; Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). By all criteria—genetic, molecular, and biochemical—these genes encode PC synthases. Arabidopsis cad1 mutants, which are Cd-hypersensitive and PC-deficient (Howden et al., 1995), are mutated in AtPCS1 (Ha et al., 1999), SpPCS gene disruptants are hypersensitive to heavy metals and deficient in cellular PCs (Ha et al., 1999), and heterologous expression of AtPCS1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an organism that lacks PCS homologs and does not otherwise synthesize PCs, confers increased heavy metal tolerance concomitant with Cd2+-dependent intracellular PC accumulation (Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). The capacity of cell-free extracts from AtPCS1- or SpPCS-transformed cells of Escherichia coli (Ha et al., 1999) and immunopurified epitope-tagged AtPCS1 for the heavy metal-activated synthesis of both short- and long-chain PCs from GSH in vitro (Vatamaniuk et al., 1999) establishes that AtPCS1 and SpPCS, and by implication TaPCS1, and their equivalents from other sources, are not only necessary but also sufficient for PC biosynthesis.
A striking outcome of the cloning of PC synthase from plants and S. pombe was the detection of a similar gene in an animal. Database searches disclosed a homologous single-copy gene in the genome of the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Designated ce-pcs-1, this gene encodes a hypothetical 40.8-kD polypeptide (CePCS1) bearing 30% identity (45% similarity) to AtPCS1 in an overlap of 367 amino acid residues (Clemens et al., 1999 ; Ha et al., 1999; Vatamaniuk et al., 1999).
Functional analyses of this homolog establish that it is a PC synthase. Heterologous expression of CePCS1 in S. cerevisiae confers increased Cd2+ tolerance and intracellular PC biosynthesis (Vatamaniuk et al., 2001
It is exhilarating to think that the involvement of PCs in the detoxification of heavy metals in animals had not been even cursorily mentioned or speculated on in the literature before the discovery, which owes its origins to fundamental research on plants, of CePCS1 (Vatamaniuk et al., 2002
To unclutter the discussion that follows, it should be pointed out that, coincident with the original cloning of the PC synthase genes from plant and fungal sources, results were presented consistent with a direct role for the terminal enzyme of GSH biosynthesis, glutathione synthetase (GSH2), in the elaboration of PCs (Al-Lahman et al., 1999 ). In suppression screens of an S. pombe Cd2+-hypersensitive mutant (M379) that seemed able to sustain GSH at levels corresponding to 40% or more of wild type but was deficient in PC synthesis, it was found that the genes encoding GSH synthetase from S. pombe and Arabidopsis partially restore PC biosynthesis and Cd2+ tolerance. Since the mutant GSH2 allele in strain M379 contains a single base-pair substitution that appeared to impair PC synthesis more than GSH synthesis, it was proposed that the GSH2 genes of S. pombe (SpGSH2) and Arabidopsis (AtGSH2) encode bifunctional enzymes competent in the synthesis of both GSH and PCs (Al-Lahman et al., 1999). Tantalizing as they were at the time, especially from the conceptual standpoint of a bifunctional enzyme competent not only in the ATP-dependent glycylation of -Glu-Cys (EC + G + ATP  ECG + ADP + Pi) but also in the -glutamylcysteinylation of GSH [ECG + EC (EC)2G or ECG + ECG (EC)2G + G], all attempts to reproduce or extend these findings were unsuccessful. Neither SpGSH2 nor AtGSH2 confer Cd2+ tolerance when heterologously expressed in S. cerevisiae, and neither yield translation products able to catalyze the synthesis of PCs in vitro from either GSH or -Glu-Cys in the presence or absence of heavy metals, Gly, and/or ATP (R. Sánchez-Fernández and P.A. Rea, unpublished data). The reason for the discrepancy between these results and those of Al-Lahman et al. (1999) is not known, but it is suspected that the chromatographic peak that was attributed to GSH in strain M379 in the latter work was principally -Glu-Cys, thus giving the impression of selective abolition of the capacity for PC synthesis, despite the intracellular availability of GSH when, in fact, GSH was the missing factor for net PC synthesis for want of the activity responsible for the glycylation of -Glu-Cys.
In most studies of partially purified preparations of the PC synthase from plant sources, GSH-dependent PC synthesis has been assumed to proceed by the transpeptidation of a -Glu-Cys unit from one GSH molecule to another to form PC2, and after the accumulation of sufficient (substrate) levels of PCs, by the transpeptidation of a -Glu-Cys unit from GSH to a PC (PCn) molecule to generate PCn+1 (Grill et al., 1989). Appropriately, the enzyme has been defined as a -Glu-Cys dipeptidyl transpeptidase and presumed to catalyze a reaction of the type:
N with cleavage of the Cys-Gly peptide bond of the donor, not the acceptor (Fig. 1). Surprising as it might seem, it is only very recently that this has been confirmed directly. Hitherto there were no published data to refute a scheme in which PC synthase catalyzes the transfer of -Glu-Cys-Gly, rather than -Glu-Cys, units in a tripeptidyl transpeptidase reaction of the type:
C, not C N, after cleavage of the Cys-Gly peptide bond of the acceptor, not the donor (Fig. 1).
This is not a trivial issue. It is critical in determining the classes of PCs that PC synthase is capable of manufacturing, as well as being vital to understanding the precise stoichiometry of the reaction catalyzed, an essential prerequisite for the dissection of the catalytic mechanism. Specifically, one implication of the possibility that PC synthase is a tripeptidyl transferase, in combination with its capacity for the synthesis of PCs from other PCs without the direct participation of GSH, is a simple mechanism for the synthesis of des(Gly)PCs. If
And Equation 2 assumes the general form:
The question of whether AtPCS1 is a dipeptidyl or tripeptidyl transferase has been addressed according to two criteria by determining whether: (1) During the synthesis of PC3 from PC2 and GSH, the Gly residue of GSH is or is not retained in PC3; and (2) des(Gly)PCs are or are not an immediate by-product of PC synthesis from PCs (Vatamaniuk et al., 2004
The dipeptidyl model predicts that the net synthesis of PC3 from PC2 and [3H-Gly]GSH would result in the total elimination of radiolabel concomitant with the liberation of free [3H]Gly, while the initial synthesis of PC3 from PC2 and [35S-Cys]GSH would result in a 1:1 molar ratio of [35S]Cys:PC3, indicating that one in three of the thiols in the product are labeled (Fig. 1):
The tripeptidyl transpeptidase model, by contrast, predicts the 1:1 stoichiometric incorporation of [3H]Gly from [3H-Gly]GSH and of [35S]Cys from [35S-Cys]GSH into PC3 concomitant with the liberation of unlabeled Gly from the outset of the reaction (Fig. 1):
With regard to criterion 2, attractive as it is as a simple and direct mechanism for the synthesis of des(Gly)PCs, in no case are these PC derivatives detectable when AtPCS1 catalyzes the synthesis of PCs from PCs in vitro, whether it be the synthesis of PC4 (and PC2) from PC3 or PC5 (and PC3) from PC4. This observation further substantiates the dipeptidyl transferase model and refutes the tripeptidyl transferase model.
A physiologically critical but biochemically confounding property of PC synthase is its susceptibility to activation by heavy metals. It is by virtue of the activation of PC synthase-catalyzed PC biosynthesis by agents, heavy metal ions that poison most enzymes, that plants, fungi, and some invertebrates are able to mount a PC-based response to heavy metals. A notable exception is the Cd-dependent carbonic anhydrase of diatoms (Lane and Morel, 2000 ). This being the case, few investigators have considered explicitly how heavy metals activate PC synthase, but those who have, have assumed that activation is a consequence of the direct binding of metal ions to the enzyme. One of the initially most-appealing models for PC synthase action invokes direct metal binding at several sites in the enzyme. In this model, it is proposed that the strongly conserved N-terminal half of the enzyme is responsible for core catalysis and that activation arises from the binding of metal ions to residues, possibly Cys residues, in this domain (Cobbett, 2000). The presence of five conserved Cys residues, two of which are vicinal, and consequently optimally disposed for the coordination of ions such as Cd2+, Cu2+, and/or Hg2+ in the N-terminal halves of eukaryotic PC synthases, is at least consistent with this notion (Fig. 2A
), as is the observation that the three most extreme Arabidopsis cad1 alleles have amino acid substitutions in this region (Ha et al., 1999). An extension of this model, proposed to ascribe a role to the more sequence-divergent C-terminal half of the molecule and to account for the properties of the least extreme cad1 allele, cad1-5—a nonsense mutation causing premature termination and deletion of the C-terminal segment (Fig. 2A)—is the concept of a C-terminal metal-sensing domain whose multiple Cys residues bind heavy metals and bring them into contact with the putative activation site within the N-terminal, catalytic half of the molecule.
This model has been and will continue to be important in prompting structure-function investigations of PC synthases, but in its original form it probably does not account for the facility of heavy metals to activate core catalysis (Vatamaniuk et al., 2000 ). First, although AtPCS1 binds Cd2+ at moderate affinity (KL = 0.54 ± 0.20 µM) and high capacity (BL = 7.09 ± 0.94), its affinity for other metal ions such as Cu2+, which are equally effective activators in vitro, is much lower. Second, the metals that elicit net PC synthesis by AtPCS1 in vitro do so despite the presence of a 66- to 132-fold molar excess of GSH and/or PC-associated thiols in the reaction media. Given that the complexes formed between heavy metals and thiol compounds are among the most stable known (Rabenstein, 1989), this means that, under the conditions in which PC synthase catalyzes high rates of PC synthesis from GSH, the concentration of free Cd2+ is only of the order of 10–13 M (some 6 orders of magnitude lower than the KL for direct binding of this metal ion to the enzyme), and more than 98% of the total Cd2+ added to the reaction medium is associated with GSH as the bidentate thiolate, bis(glutathionato) cadmium (Cd.GS2). Third, analyses of the steady-state kinetics of AtPCS1-catalyzed PC synthesis demonstrate that activity is strictly dependent on metal thiolate and free GSH concentration, not free metal concentration, and approximates a bisubstrate-substituted enzyme reaction in which Cd.GS2 and GSH serve as high-affinity and low-affinity substrates, respectively. Fourth, when assayed in media devoid of metal salts, AtPCS1 catalyzes the net synthesis of S-alkyl-PCs from S-alkyl glutathione derivatives at rates similar to the synthesis of unsubstituted PCs from equivalent concentrations of GSH in media containing heavy metals. The most straightforward explanation of these properties is that PC synthases catalyze a bisubstrate transpeptidation reaction in which both free GSH and its corresponding metal thiolate are cosubstrates. Moreover, although both free GSH and its metal thiolate are ordinarily required for maximal activity, other compounds, for instance S-substituted GSH derivates, can substitute for both in such a way as to overcome the enzyme's otherwise near-obligatory requirement for heavy metals for activity, implying that the decisive factor for core catalysis is the provision of glutathione-like substrate peptides containing blocked thiol groups.
It is important to note that this scheme does not necessarily preclude the augmentation of activity by direct metal ion binding to the enzyme. Indeed, when the reaction conditions are designed so as to be compatible with the availability of not only sufficient substrate but also adequate concentrations of free metal ions, by exploiting the capacity of S-alkylglutathiones to act as substrates, despite their inability to form metal thiolates, promotion of S-alkyl-PC synthesis up and above that conferred by the provision of substrate containing blocked thiol groups is readily detectable (Vatamaniuk et al., 2000
On the basis of their investigations of AtPCS1 and the homo-PC synthase of soybean [Glycine max; GmhPCS1], Oven et al. (2002)
Two notable physiological implications follow from investigations of the metal dependence of PC synthase-catalyzed PC synthesis in vitro. The first is that, contrary to earlier models, (Loeffler et al., 1989 ; Zenk, 1996), the reactions catalyzed by PC synthases probably do not self-terminate through the chelation of activating metal ions by the PC products per se because GSH and PC complexes containing heavy metal are active substrate species. Instead, termination of the reaction more likely results from substrate depletion. Diminution of the substrate-active thiolate pool, whether it be by the incorporation of heavy metals into higher order, substrate-inactive metal-PC complexes or by the removal of metal-PC complexes from the cytosolic pool into the vacuole, is probably the determining factor for ensuring that PC synthesis meets, but does not exceed, needs.
The second physiological implication is that the cytosolic concentration of free metal ions need not increase even transitorily for net PC synthesis. Given the high values of the stability constants of heavy metal-GSH complexes and the high prevailing concentration of GSH, any soft metal that gains access to the cytosol would be expected to be incorporated into the corresponding thiolate. The GSH thiolates so formed because of the moderately high and constitutive expression of PCS genes (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002
The notion that the intracellular concentrations of free heavy metals need not increase except when the mechanisms for coping with them are exceeded, and necrotic or apoptotic cell death ensues, raises the question of whether other systems or components of the PC-dependent system for heavy metal detoxification, for instance, heavy metal transporters, interact directly with metal thiolates rather than with free metal ions. This clearly applies to the S. cerevisiae multidrug resistance-associated protein-type ATP-binding cassette transporter yeast cadmium factor 1 (YCF1), originally identified according to its ability to confer resistance to Cd2+ salts (Szczypka et al., 1994
Implicit in the finding that the steady-state kinetics of PC synthase-catalyzed PC synthesis from GSH in media containing heavy metals approximate a scheme in which heavy metal thiolate and GSH interact via a substituted enzyme intermediate, not a ternary complex, is the formation of an enzyme covalent intermediate during catalysis. What is more, given that at least one peptide bond must be cleaved and at least one new peptide bond formed for each molecule of PC2 synthesized, and initial attack on the carbonyl carbon of the peptide bond to be cleaved must be by a nucleophile, it is almost inevitable that the substituted enzyme intermediate formed is a -Glu-Cys acyl intermediate. This is indeed the case. PC synthase undergoes acylation at two sites during catalysis, albeit with different ligand requirements, and acylation at at least one of these sites appears to be necessary for net PC synthesis (Vatamaniuk et al., 2004). The provision of free GSH in media devoid of metal ions is sufficient for acylation of the first site, a reaction that is not accompanied by appreciable net PC synthesis, whereas acylation at the second site necessitates the provision of heavy metal ions, as exemplified by Cd2+, and is accompanied by the net synthesis of PCs.
There are two corollaries that follow from these findings. The first is that initial nucleophilic attack on the scissile bond of the dipeptidyl donor is by an enzyme hydroxyl-derived oxyanion or thiol-derived thiolate anion to generate a
The results of mutational analyses directed at determining which Cys or Ser residues, if any, in AtPCS1 might participate in initial nucleophilic attack on the
A remarkable feature of PC synthase is that, while the C56S and C56A substitutions are strictly associated with the abolition of PC synthetic activity, they are not accompanied by abolition of acylation at the second site. The implication, but one that has yet to be deciphered mechanistically, is that the initial Cys-56-dependent, Cd2+-independent first-site acylation is not a prerequisite for the subsequent Cys-56-independent second-site acylation of AtPCS1, but it is essential for net PC synthesis which, in turn, might imply that the condensation of enzyme-bound -Glu-Cys with GSH for the synthesis of PC2 is contingent on acylation of the enzyme at the first site and possibly, but not necessarily, both sites (see below).
In considering these findings, account should also be taken of the alternate or auxiliary role proposed for Cys residues. This is the possibility that the activation of catalysis depends on the binding of heavy metal ions, such as Cd2+, to essential Cys-containing metal-binding sites in the N-terminal catalytic sector of the enzyme. In support of this, Maier et al. (2003)
Though elegant and in many ways informative, it cannot be decided whether the Cd2+ binding detected in these experiments would be operative under the conditions that prevail in vivo or even in vitro when PC synthetic activity is maximal because they were performed at free Cd2+ concentrations (10 µM) far in excess of those that are achieved cytosolically under physiological conditions or can be achieved when GSH is present at the millimolar concentrations necessary for net PC synthesis. Likewise, while intact AtPCS1 binds 109Cd2+ at high capacity—incidentally at a stoichiometry congruent with the total of seven putative binding sites identified by the peptide-mapping studies of TaPCS1 under identical buffer conditions (Maier et al., 2003
PC synthase-like polypeptides are much more widespread phylogenetically than was once thought. Systematic sequence database searches disclose 30 putative PC synthase homologs. Of these, 20 are canonical PC synthases from plants and three are their equivalents from other eukaryotes—one each from S. pombe, C. elegans, and C. briggsae. Nothing new here. What is new, however, is that the remaining sequences are from bacterial sources and all are approximately one-half the length of their cognates from eukaryotes (220–237 compared to 421–506 residues) because they lack the more variable C-terminal domain. Four of the bacterial sequences are from cyanobacteria (two Nostoc species, Prochlorococcus marinus and Trichodesmium erythraeum; Tsuji et al., 2004 ), and three are from proteobacteria (Burkholderia fungorum, Microbulbifer degradans, and Bradyrhizobium japonicum; D.J. Rigden, O.K. Vatamaniuk, A. Lang, and P.A. Rea, unpublished data). Despite their relatively low (22%–36%) sequence identity with the eukaryotic enzymes in the N-terminal catalytic domain, which in and of itself is insufficient to guarantee a strict catalytic equivalence, the one prokaryotic PC synthase homolog that has been assayed for activity, the alr0975 protein from Nostoc sp. PCC 7120, does indeed have PC synthase activity. This protein catalyzes the deglycylation of GSH to -Glu-Cys at a high rate and the synthesis of PC2 at a relatively low rate, and these activities are seen regardless of whether micromolar Cd2+ is or is not included in the reaction medium (Tsuji et al., 2004). Protein alr0975 and presumably other half-molecule PC synthase homologs from bacterial sources, therefore, have the characteristics of thiol peptide transpeptidases or minimally peptidases that antedate the canonical eukaryotic PC synthases.
Incisive investigations of AtPCS1 after its C-terminal truncation by limited proteolysis (Ruotolo et al., 2004
Recognition of the fundamental equivalence between the N-terminal catalytic half of the eukaryotic PC synthases and their half-molecule cognates from prokaryotes has been instrumental in the assembly of a representative subset of sequences for deeper and wider scans of sequence databases. In particular, deployment of this expanded PC synthase sequence dataset for application of the FFAS03 method for sequence profile matching (Rychlewski et al., 2000 ) has yielded important fresh insights into the structure-function characteristics of PC synthases. FFASO3 is a high-sensitivity method for the detection of distant homologies wherein a PSI-BLAST profile (alignment) for the target protein is first generated by database searching and similar profiles are precalculated for all of the proteins of known structure identified in the searches. Using this information, FFASO3 then aligns the target profile with each of those derived from the proteins of known structure, while optimizing the scoring function for sensitivity and reliability (Rychlewski et al., 2000). Application of this algorithm to the extended PC synthase family reveals clear matches with Clan CA Cys proteases, as exemplified by the archetype, papain, from Carica papaya fruit and latex, staphopain A, an extracellular enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus, and several of the lysosomal cathepsins from animal sources (Fig. 2B).
The need for caution is inevitable when basing conclusions on sequence-matching algorithms of this type, but several other considerations support the notion of a distant homology between PC synthases and Clan CA Cys proteases. First, there is a fundamental catalytic equivalence between PC synthases, dipeptidyl transferases, and Cys proteases in terms of the partial reactions they catalyze (Vatamaniuk et al., 2000 Site-directed mutagenesis substantiates these inferences by confirming that not only Cys-56, but also His-162 and Asp-180, are essential for catalysis by AtPCS1 (D.J. Rigden, O.K.Vatamaniuk, A. Lang, and P.A. Rea, unpublished data). Of the 19 Asp, Cys, His, Ser, Thr, and Tyr residues conserved among the N-terminal domains of eukaryotic PC synthases, only three, Cys-56, His-162, and Asp-180, when substituted, abolish the capacity of AtPCS1 to confer Cd2+ tolerance and catalyze PC synthesis.
Although other transpeptidases acting on GSH and related thiols bear an evolutionary relationship with other hydrolases (Inoue et al., 2000 ), PC synthases are the first transpeptidases associated with the papain superfamily. Two broadly significant ramifications therefore follow. The first concerns the prokaryotic PC synthase-like half-molecules. The second concerns the mechanism of PC synthase-mediated catalysis.
With respect to the prokaryotic half-molecules, when account is taken of the overall degree of sequence similarity in the PC synthase family, in combination with conservation of the catalytic triad, it is likely even if the bacterial sequences are not those of a true PC synthase that their substrates resemble those of their eukaryotic homologs. One possibility, other than PC synthesis per se, is that the bacterial enzymes serve to cleave glutathione S-conjugates (GS-conjugates). Knowing that GS-conjugate cleavage is a major auxiliary capability of eukaryotic PC synthases (Beck et al., 2003
With respect to catalytic mechanism, the assignment of the PC synthase family to the papain superfamily, combined with conservation of the catalytic triad of the former in the latter, and the facility of both classes of enzyme to mediate reactions that approximate substituted enzyme kinetics necessitating the formation of a cysteinyl enzyme acyl-intermediate, is consistent with a Cys protease-type reaction scheme for PC synthesis (Fig. 3). Implicit in the finding that the time and concentration dependence of PC synthesis approximates substituted-enzyme kinetics (Vatamaniuk et al., 2000 ) and that AtPCS1 forms a -Glu-Cys acyl intermediate during catalysis (Vatamaniuk et al., 2004) is initiation of the overall biosynthetic reaction by cleavage of the Cys-Gly bond of the first substrate. By analogy with papain, therefore, nucleophilic attack on the scissile bond of the first substrate, the donor, by a Cys-derived thiolate anion, specifically that of Cys-56, and formation of a -Glu-Cys thioester, concomitant with the liberation of substrate Gly, is invoked for the first step (Step 1, Fig. 3). As in Cys proteases in general, the nucleophilicity of Cys-56 is thought to be enhanced by its proximity to His-162 and Asp-180. The sulfhydryl proton from Cys-56 is transferred to the imidazole ring of His-162, whose electrophilicity is enhanced by its immediate adjacency to the -carboxylate on Asp-180. In the second step (Step 2, Fig. 3), the Gly released from the first substrate dissociates from the enzyme and is replaced by the second substrate, the acceptor. In the simplest case, the synthesis of PC2 from two molecules of GSH, the acceptor is another molecule of GSH. The N terminus of the acceptor GSH then nucleophilically attacks the enzyme thioester intermediate, resulting in the formation of PC2 and regeneration of the free thiol group of Cys-56 (Step 3, Fig. 3). The dissociation of PC2 from the enzyme and its replacement by a new molecule of donor GSH completes the catalytic cycle (Step 4, Fig. 3). The same mechanism can explain the formation of longer chain PCs if, instead of GSH, PCn is bound at Step 2 to yield PCn+1 as product.
The key difference between this mechanism and that of the papain family is that, during net PC synthesis, nucleophilic attack on the thioester intermediate is not by water but instead by a second substrate molecule, thus resulting in transpeptidation rather than net hydrolysis. The facility of not only prokaryotic PC synthases (Tsuji et al., 2004
Pending data to the contrary, it is suspected that the second, non-Cys-56-coupled site of acylation of AtPCS1 (Vatamaniuk et al., 2004
Considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanism of heavy metal activation of PC synthesis and the catalytic mechanism of PC synthase. On the basis of the results of recent investigations, it can be inferred that the enzyme is a -glutamylcysteine dipeptidyl transpeptidase that mediates a bisubstrate reaction in which the thiol group(s) of at least one of the substrates is(are) blocked, usually, but not necessarily, through the formation of a heavy metal thiolate. The reaction approximates substituted enzyme kinetics and is strictly associated with -glutamylcysteinyl acylation of the enzyme at two sites, one of which corresponds to or is closely coupled to AtPCS1 Cys-56 or its equivalents in other PC synthases. In agreement with earlier speculations, the N-terminal domain of eukaryotic PC synthases, the portion that is represented in the half-molecule homologs from prokaryotes, is responsible for core catalysis. It is this domain that bears a distant homology to papain superfamily proteases and encompasses the putative Cys protease-type catalytic triad that is essential for catalysis, AtPCS1 residues Cys-56, His-162, and Asp-180. That is what is known, at least to a first approximation. What is not known is the identity of the second site of acylation and of the residues and structural determinants responsible for substrate selectivity, and the precise role played by the C-terminal domain in eukaryotic PC synthases other than in contributing to the range of metal ions capable of stimulating enzyme activity. These are eminently tractable short- to medium-term research objectives, ones that would be greatly expedited when the enzyme or one or more of its nearest homologs has been crystallized and its three-dimensional structure solved. Less tractable, but no less important, is the question of what precisely the enzyme does—why does the enzyme exist? Other review authors, Cobbett (2000), for instance, present cogent arguments to the effect that PC synthases may play a role in heavy metal detoxification even in unpolluted environments, but it is still a mystery as to why the enzyme is expressed constitutively and at such relatively high levels regardless of mineral status. From what is known of its domain organization, it is as if the enzyme is bifunctional and one of the functions, the non-PC synthetic one required for basic maintenance activity, has yet to be defined or at least defined knowingly. Perhaps this will be the topic of a future review. Received June 22, 2004; returned for revision July 15, 2004; accepted July 18, 2004.
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. MCB–0077838 to P.A.R). 
2 This review is dedicated to Professor Emmanuel Epstein, whose seminal work on ion transport by plants was a major factor in prompting one of us (P.A.R.) to venture into the world of mechanistic plant research. Professor Epstein's facility for incisive and inventive dissection of ostensibly daunting phenomena was a thrill to share through his many formative publications. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.048579. * Corresponding author; e-mail parea{at}sas.upenn.edu; fax 215–898–8780.
Al-Lahman A, Rohde V, Heim P, Leughter R, Veeck J, Wunderlich C, Wolf K, Zimmermann M (1999) Biosynthesis of phytochelatin in the fission yeast. Phytochelatin synthesis: a second role for the glutathione synthetase gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 15: 385–396[CrossRef][Medline] Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND (2001) Evolutionary lines of cysteine proteases. Biol Chem 382: 727–733[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Beck A, Lendzian K, Oven M, Christmann A, Grill E (2003) Phytochelatin synthase catalyzes key step in turnover of glutathione conjugates. Phytochemistry 62: 423–431[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Brennan RJ, Schiestl RH (1996) Cadmium is an inducer of oxidative stress in yeast. Mutat Res 356: 171–178[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cheah E, Austin C, Ashley GW, Ollis D (1993) Substrate-induced activation of dienelactone hydrolase: an enzyme with a naturally occurring Cys-His-Asp triad. Protein Eng 6: 575–583 Clemens S (2001) Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 212: 475–486[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Clemens S, Kim EJ, Neumann D, Schroeder JI (1999) Tolerance to toxic metals by a gene family of phytochelatin synthases from plants and yeast. EMBO J 18: 3325–3333[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Clemens S, Schroeder JI, Degenkolb T (2001) Caenorhabditis expresses a functional phytochelatin synythase. Eur J Biochem 268: 3640–3643[Web of Science][Medline]
Cobbett CS (2000) Phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiol 123: 825–832 Cobbett C, Goldsbrough P (2002) Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53: 159–182[CrossRef][Medline] Elmsley J (2001) Nature's Building Blocks. An A-Z Guide to the Elements. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Freedman JH, Ciriolo MR, Peisach J (1989) The role of glutathione in copper metabolism and toxicity. J Biol Chem 264: 5598–5605
Ghosh M, Shen J, Rosen BP (1999) Pathways of As(III) detoxification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5001–5006
Grill E, Löffler S, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH (1989) Phytochelatins, the heavy metal-binding peptides of plants are synthesized from glutathione by a specific
Ha S-B, Smith AP, Howden R, Dietrich WM, Bugg S, O'Connell MJ, Goldsbrough PB, Cobbett CS (1999) Phytochelatin synthase genes from Arabidopsis and the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Plant Cell 11: 1153–1163 Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (1984) Iron and free radical reactions: two aspects of antioxidant protection. Trends Biochem Sci 11: 372–375 Howden R, Goldsbrough PB, Andersen CR, Cobbett CS (1995) Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol 107: 1059–1066[Abstract] Humm A, Fritsche E, Mann K, Gohl M, Huber R (1997a) Recombinant expression and isolation of human L-arginine:glycine amidinotranferase and identification of its active site cysteine residue. Biochem J 322: 771–776 Humm A, Fritsche E, Steinbacher S, Huber R (1997b) Crystal structure and mechanism of human L-arginine:glycine amidinotranferase: a mitochondrial enzyme involved in creatine biosynthesis. EMBO J 16: 3373–3385[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Inoue M, Hiratake J, Suzuki H, Kumagai H, Sakata K (2000) Identification of catalytic nucleophile of Escherichia coli Inzé D, Van Montagu M (1995) Oxidative stress in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 6: 153–158[CrossRef] Kamphuis IG, Drenth J, Baker EN (1985) Thiol proteases. Comparative studies based on the high-resolution structures of papain and actinidin, and on amino acid sequence information for cathepsins B and H, and stem bromelain. J Mol Biol 182: 317–329[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Kondo N, Imai K, Isobe M, Goto T, Murasugi A, Wada-Nakagawa C, Hayashi Y (1984) Cadystin A and B, major unit peptides comprising cadmium binding peptides induced in a fission yeast—separation, revision of structures and synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett 25: 3869–3872[CrossRef] Kraut J (1977) Serine proteases: structure and mechanism of catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 331–358[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lane TW, Morel FM (2000) A biological function for cadmium in marine diatoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 4627–4631
Li Z-S, Lu Y-P, Thiele DJ, Rea PA (1997) A new pathway for vacuolar cadmium sequestration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: YCF1-mediated transport of bis(glutathionato)cadmium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 42–47 Loeffler S, Hochberger A, Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH (1989) Termination of the phytochelatin synthase reaction through sequestration of heavy metals by the reaction product. FEBS Lett 258: 42–46[CrossRef] Maier T, Yu C, Kullertz G, Clemens S (2003) Localization and functional characterization of phytochelatin synthases. Planta 218: 300–308[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Maser P, Thomine S, Schroeder JI, Ward JM, Hirschi K, Sze H, Talke IN, Amtmann A, Maathuis FM, Sanders D, et al (2001) Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126: 1646–1667 Ortiz DF, Kreppel L, Speiser DM, Scheel G, MacDonald G, Ow DW (1992) Heavy metal tolerance in the fission yeast requires an ATP-binding cassette-type vacuolar membrane transporter. EMBO J 11: 3491–3499[Web of Science][Medline]
Ortiz DF, Ruscitti T, McCue KF, Ow DW (1995) Transport of metal-binding peptides by HMT1, a fission yeast ABC-type vacuolar membrane protein. J Biol Chem 270: 4721–4728
Oven M, Page JE, Zenk MH, Kutchan TM (2002) Molecular characterization of the homo-phytochelatin synthase of soybean Glycine max. Relation to phytochelatin synthase. J Biol Chem 277: 4747–4754 Rabenstein DL (1989) Metal complexes of glutathione and their biological significance. In D Dolphin, R Poulson, O Avramovic, eds, Glutathione: Chemical, Biochemical and Medical Aspects. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 147–186 Rauser WE (1999) Structure and function of metal chelators produced by plants: the case for organic acids, amino acids, phytin and metallothioneins. Cell Biochem Biophys 31: 19–48[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ruotolo R, Peracchi A, Bolchi A, Infusini G, Amoresano A, Ottonello S (2004) Domain organization of phytochelatin synthase. Functional properties of truncated enzyme species identified by limited proteolysis. J Biol Chem 279: 14686–14693 Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 9: 232–241[Web of Science][Medline] Satofuka H, Fukui T, Takagi M, Atomi H, Imanaka T (2001) Metal-binding properties of phytochelatin-related peptides. J Inorg Biochem 86: 595–602[Medline] Stadtmann ER (1993) Oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins by radiolysis and by metal-catalyzed reactions. Annu Rev Biochem 62: 797–821[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Stohs SJ, Bagchi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 18: 321–336[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Szczypka MS, Wemmie JA, Moye-Rowley WS, Thiele DJ (1994) A yeast metal resistance protein similar to human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and multidrug resistance-associated protein. J Biol Chem 269: 22853–22857 Tsuji N, Nishikori S, Iwabe O, Shiraki K, Miyasaka H, Takagi M, Hirata K, Miyamoto K (2004) Characterization of phytochelatin synthase-like protein encoded by alr0975 from a prokaryote, Nostoc sp. PCC 7120. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 315: 751–755[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Vatamaniuk OK, Bucher EA, Rea PA (2002) Worms take the ‘phyto’ out of ‘phytochelatins’. Trends Biotechnol 20: 61–64[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vatamaniuk OK, Bucher EA, Ward JT, Rea PA (2001) A new pathway for heavy metal detoxification in animals: phytochelatin synthase is required for cadmium tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem 276: 20817–20820
Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lang A, Chalasani S, Demkiv L, Rea PA (2004) Phytochelatin synthase, a dipeptidyltransferase that undergoes multisite acylation with
Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lu Y-P, Rea PA (1999) AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana: isolation and in vitro reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 7110–7115
Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lu Y-P, Rea PA (2000) Mechanism of heavy metal activation of phytochelatin (PC) synthase: blocked thiols are sufficient for PC synthase-catalyzed transpeptidation of glutathione and related thiol peptides. J Biol Chem 275: 31451–31459 Voet D, Voet JG (2004) Biochemistry, Ed 3. John Wiley & Sons, New York Zenk MH (1996) Heavy metal detoxification in higher plants: a review. Gene 179: 21–30[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOP
HEAVY METAL TOXICITY
LONG-CHAIN GLUTATHIONE...
-helix; arrows, 
