|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 23, 2004; 10.1104/pp.104.055954 Plant Physiology 137:242-252 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists Identification of a Novel Enzyme Required for Starch Metabolism in Arabidopsis Leaves. The Phosphoglucan, Water Dikinase1,[w]Plant Physiology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Golm, Germany (O.K., K.P., M.S., G.R.); and Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Golm, Germany (A.T., P.G.)
The phosphorylation of amylopectin by the glucan, water dikinase (GWD; EC 2.7.9.4) is an essential step within starch metabolism. This is indicated by the starch excess phenotype of GWD-deficient plants, such as the sex1-3 mutant of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). To identify starch-related enzymes that rely on glucan-bound phosphate, we studied the binding of proteins extracted from Arabidopsis wild-type leaves to either phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated starch granules. Granules prepared from the sex1-3 mutant were prephosphorylated in vitro using recombinant potato (Solanum tuberosum) GWD. As a control, the unmodified, phosphate free granules were used. An as-yet uncharacterized protein was identified that preferentially binds to the phosphorylated starch. The C-terminal part of this protein exhibits similarity to that of GWD. The novel protein phosphorylates starch granules, but only following prephosphorylation with GWD. The enzyme transfers the -P of ATP to the phosphoglucan, whereas the -P is released as orthophosphate. Therefore, the novel protein is designated as phosphoglucan, water dikinase (PWD). Unlike GWD that phosphorylates preferentially the C6 position of the glucose units, PWD phosphorylates predominantly (or exclusively) the C3 position. Western-blot analysis of protoplast and chloroplast fractions from Arabidopsis leaves reveals a plastidic location of PWD. Binding of PWD to starch granules strongly increases during net starch breakdown. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants in which the expression of PWD was reduced by either RNAi or a T-DNA insertion exhibit a starch excess phenotype. Thus, in Arabidopsis leaves starch turnover requires a close collaboration of PWD and GWD.
Starch, as the predominant storage carbohydrate in plants, is a major constituent of human and animal diets, and it is also an important raw material for various industrial processes (Slattery et al., 2000
Phosphorylation of starch like polyglucans is catalyzed by the glucan, water dikinase (GWD, formerly designated as R1; EC 2.7.9.4; Ritte et al., 2002
The catalytic mechanism includes autophosphorylation of the dikinase protein. The
In GWD-deficient plants, not only starch phosphorylation but also starch breakdown is strongly impaired. In GWD antisense potato plants (Lorberth et al., 1998 Here we describe the discovery of a novel protein, which preferentially binds to phosphorylated starch. Its enzymatic function was investigated in vitro using purified protein and in vivo using transgenic plants.
Identification of a Novel Protein That Preferentially Binds to Phosphorylated Starch Granules in Vitro
To identify proteins whose activity depends on starch-bound phosphate esters, we compared binding of proteins to phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated starch granules. Phosphate free starch granules were isolated from leaves of the GWD-deficient Arabidopsis sex1-3 mutant (Yu et al., 2001
Using primers designed for the At5g26570 gene, the full-length OK1 cDNA sequence was cloned. In the sequence thereby derived, 15 additional nucleotides (1,5551,569) were found that were not present in the already existing corresponding National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) entry (NM_122538). The OK1 cDNA sequence was submitted to EMBL (accession no. AJ635427).
OK1 and GWD amino acid sequences were compared using the BLAST 2 Sequences tool (Tatusova and Madden, 1999
Analysis of the OK1 sequence using TargetP (Emanuelsson et al., 2000
OK1 Is Localized in Plastids
The prediction of OK1 being a plastidic protein by the bioinformatic programs was further strengthened by western-blot analysis of extracts made from Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts and chloroplasts isolated from protoplasts. Equal amounts of protein were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blot using specific antibodies raised against ADP-Glc-pyrophosphorylase (AGPase, plastidic marker), PEP-carboxylase (cytosolic marker), and OK1. As shown in Figure 3 for both AGPase and OK1, an immunosignal was obtained in the chloroplast fraction, whereas there was hardly any signal in the protoplast fraction. In contrast, the cytosolic marker PEP-carboxylase was exclusively detected in the protoplast fraction. Nonaqueous fractionation of Arabidopsis leaf material and subsequent western-blot analysis also indicates that OK1 resides in plastids (data not shown). Furthermore, OK1 is found in the Arabidopsis chloroplast protein database (http://www.pb.ipw.biol.ethz.ch/index.php?toc=91; Kleffmann et al., 2004
OK1 Is a Phosphoglucan, Water Dikinase
A vector was constructed allowing the expression of OK1 containing a 6xHis tag at the N terminus in Escherichia coli and one step purification of the recombinant protein using a Ni-NTA agarose resin. The full-size OK1 protein is clearly predominant in the resulting protein fraction (Supplemental Fig. 1). Because of the similarity between OK1 and GWD, we tested whether or not OK1 also displays starch phosphorylating activity. As for the in vitro binding assay, nonphosphorylated or phosphorylated starch granules served as substrates. OK1 was indeed able to transfer 33P from [
To study the fate of the -P of ATP, we analyzed OK1-catalyzed incorporation of -P into phosphorylated starch using [ -33P]ATP as phosphate donor as well as a possible release of -P-ortophosphate into the soluble phase using [ -33P]ATP. For comparison, the same experiment was also conducted using recombinant potato GWD, for which we have shown before that water is the acceptor of the -P (Ritte et al., 2002 -P released exceeded that of -P detected in the starch fraction by about 20% to 30%. However, it is possible that the amount of incorporated phosphate is underestimated due to some loss of starch granules during the extensive washing procedure.
We conclude that OK1 is a phosphoglucan, water dikinase (PWD) that transfers the -P of ATP to a phosphoglucan and the -P of ATP to water:
Therefore, we replace the preliminary term OK1 with PWD.
Under standard assay conditions (10 mg phosphorylated starch granules/mL, 25 µM ATP, 30 min), a linear correlation between PWD protein amount and phosphate incorporation into the substrate is only observed at low protein concentrations (<0.1 µg/mg starch; Supplemental Fig. 2A). For 0.05 µg PWD/mg starch, we calculated an activity of 2.55 nmol min1 (mg protein)1. This value is slightly underestimated because [ For a more quantitative analysis, starch granules containing different amounts of phosphate esters (9, 49, and 215 pmol P/mg starch) were reacted with PWD (Supplemental Fig. 2B). The granule preparation with the highest phosphate content was the most efficient phosphate acceptor. However, PWD activities with the different substrates varied about 6-fold, whereas the level of prephosphorylation varied about 24-fold. Thus, there is no linear relation between the phosphate content of a polyglucan and its capacity to serve as phosphate acceptor for PWD. As observed with nonphosphorylated sex1-3 starch granules PWD was unable to phosphorylate solubilized sex1-3 starch (Supplemental Fig. 2C). However, even solubilized sex1-3 starch that had been prephosphorylated by GWD proved to be an extremely poor substrate for PWD (Supplemental Fig. 2C). The same holds true for soluble potato starch (Sigma S-2004) although it contains approximately 15 nmol P/mg starch (data not shown). Possibly, the structure of the starch granule or of the surface of the particle is also important for the PWD activity.
A phosphohistidine is an intermediate in the dikinase type reactions catalyzed by PPDK (Goss et al., 1980
PWD Phosphorylates Preferably the C3 Position of the Glucosyl Residues in Phosphoglucans To analyze which positions of the Glc residues are phosphorylated by PWD, starch was prephosphorylated by GWD (using unlabeled ATP) and then phosphorylated by PWD using 33P-ATP. For comparison, an experiment in which starch was solely phosphorylated by GWD (using labeled ATP) was also performed. Following in vitro phosphorylation, Glc and Glc-Ps were released from starch by means of acid hydrolysis. To separate Glc-6-P and Glc-3-P, the samples were subjected to high performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). Since the extent of in vitro phosphorylation is too low to allow for reliable amperometric detection of the Glc-Ps thereby formed we added authentic Glc-6-P and Glc-3-P as standards. Fractions were collected and the radioactivity was counted.
In contrast to GWD, which phosphorylates preferably the C6-position, PWD phosphorylates predominantly the C3-position (Fig. 6). Approximately 70% of the radioactivity incorporated into starch by PWD coeluted with Glc-3-P in two independent experiments. It has to be considered that Glc-3-P is a rather acid labile compound. The investigation of starch bound phosphate esters by acid hydrolysis of granular starch and subsequent analysis of the products by HPAEC-PAD was adapted from Blennow et al. (1998)
In Vitro Analysis of PWD Purified from Leaves Confirms the Results with the Heterologously Expressed Protein Analysis of the recombinant PWD has revealed unique features of this enzyme. However, it has to be kept in mind that the recombinant PWD protein is not identical to PWD in plants. Since the length of the transit peptide is only predicted but not exactly known the complete coding sequence of PWD was used to generate the expression vector. Furthermore, the protein contains an N-terminal His tag and a single amino acid replacement (see "Materials and Methods"). Therefore, we analyzed the plant-derived protein in addition to the recombinant PWD. The protein was partially purified by ammoniumsulfate precipitation and affinity chromatography using immobilized maltoheptaose (Supplemental Fig. 3A). As has been shown for the recombinant protein, activity of PWD purified from leaves strictly depended on a preceding phosphorylation by GWD (Supplemental Fig. 3B) and phosphorylation predominantly (or exclusively) occurs at the C3-position of the Glc residues (Supplemental Fig. 3C).
To investigate the in vivo function of PWD, an RNA interference (RNAi) construct was designed to repress the activity of this protein in Arabidopsis. Fifteen transgenic lines were analyzed by western blot, all of which proved to be strongly reduced in PWD protein (data not shown). Five of these lines were examined in more detail. As shown in Figure 7A the PWD protein amount in the RNAi lines 1 to 4 is below the limit of detection using western-blot analysis. In line 5 PWD expression is reduced by at least 75%. The analysis of starch contents in these plants revealed a metabolic phenotype for PWD. At the end of the day, the PWD-deficient plants contained up to 2 times more starch than ecotype Columbia wild type (Fig. 7B). Starch is nearly completely remobilized during night in wild-type but not in the transgenic plants. In the less inhibited RNAi-line 5, starch amounts are only slightly increased compared with wild-type plants. Thus, the extent of PWD inhibition correlates with the effect on starch content.
We also obtained an insertion mutant (SALK_110814) and selected a homozygous line for the At5g26570 gene. No PWD protein could be detected in the mutant (data not shown). As observed with the RNAi plants, the PWD knockout mutant (pwd) contains considerably more starch than wild-type plants throughout the day/night cycle (Fig. 7C). Starch turnover occurred in the PWD-deficient plants, but the rate of starch degradation in the pwd plants was lower than that of the wild-type plants (Fig. 7C). This effect was also observed using an independent batch of plants grown under a 14-h-light period (data not shown). The high starch phenotype resembles that of the GWD-deficient sex1 mutants. However, when grown under the same conditions the sex1 mutants accumulate more starch than the pwd plants. The lack of PWD had a minor effect on plant development, whereas the GWD knockout mutant sex1-3 is strongly retarded in growth when cultivated under a 12-h-light/12-h-dark regime (Supplemental Fig. 4).
Starch-bound phosphates in wild-type and PWD RNAi plants (lines 15) were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD and quantification of the peak areas following acid hydrolysis of the starch granules. The Glc-6-P:Glc-3-P ratio increased from 2.1 in wild type to 2.5 in the transgenic plants (mean of lines 15), ranging from 2.2 in line 5 to 2.7 in line 1. This increase, however, was caused by slightly elevated Glc-6-P levels, whereas the Glc-3-P content was essentially unchanged (data not shown). The Glc-6-P:Glc-3-P ratio in starch of pwd plants was also increased compared with wild type (data not shown). It has to be considered that the Glc phosphate levels in starch hydrolyzates mainly reflect starch phosphorylation during biosynthesis and not the transient phosphorylation of the granule surface during breakdown (Ritte et al., 2004
To analyze whether binding of PWD to transitory starch is affected by the physiological state of the cell, granule-bound and soluble protein was extracted from leaves of wild-type plants that had been harvested either in the light or dark period. As revealed by western-blot analysis, binding of PWD to the surface of transitory starch granules strongly increases during starch mobilization in darkness (Fig. 8). In contrast, the PWD level in the buffer soluble fraction was equal in the light and dark samples. Binding of GWD to transitory starch in Arabidopsis also significantly increases in darkness (Fig. 8), in agreement with earlier results using leaves of potato and pea, respectively (Ritte et al., 2000a
The factors and mechanisms leading to the degradation of the crystalline starch granule are largely unknown, but there is increasing evidence that phosphorylation of starch by GWD is involved (Zeeman et al., 2004 Why is PWD active only on phosphorylated starch? It is reasonable to assume that PWD either phosphorylates glucan chains that were previously phosphorylated by GWD, or it phosphorylates unphosphorylated chains within a phosphorylated matrix. Analysis of the phosphorylated glucan chains following in vitro phosphorylation with 33P-ATP shows that the latter predominates. Approximately 80% of the incorporated label was recovered in singly phosphorylated glucan chains; the remaining radioactivity was found in doubly phosphorylated chains. Probably phosphate incorporation by GWD locally alters the starch structure and thereby generates phosphorylation sites that can be used by PWD. Whereas activity of PWD strictly depends on the presence of glucan bound phosphate binding of the protein to carbohydrates does not. PWD can bind to the unmodified sex1-3 granules, albeit with low efficiency. The protein also binds to immobilized maltoheptaose (S. Orzechowski, unpublished data), and we made use of this to enrich the protein from leaf extracts. These maltoheptaose beads were also not at all phosphorylated by the recombinant PWD (data not shown).
An important difference between PWD and GWD is the site of phosphate incorporation. GWD phosphorylates both the C3 and the C6 position, with a clear preference of the latter. In contrast, PWD phosphorylates preferably the C3 position (Fig. 6). A low extent of C6-phosphorylation cannot be ruled out; the same holds true for C2-phosphorylation. It has been suggested by Tabata and Hizukuri (1971)
Starch is phosphorylated during its biosynthesis (Nielsen et al., 1994
The increased phosphorylation of the granule surface during breakdown of starch in chloroplasts (Ritte et al., 2004
The starch excess phenotype observed in the PWD-deficient plants demonstrates that this enzyme plays an important metabolic role, and lack of PWD-catalyzed starch phosphorylation cannot be (fully) compensated for by other enzymes. Since the activity of PWD depends on a preceding starch phosphorylation by GWD, the lack of GWD in mutant plants should also abolish starch phosphorylation by PWD. Consistently, no Glc-3-P residues could be detected in starch of the GWD-free Arabidopsis mutant sex1-3 (Yu et al., 2001
Further studies are required to explore the link between phosphorylation and degradation of starch. It has recently been reported that the in vitro degradation of granules isolated from turions of the duckweed by starch associated proteins (including a putative GWD ortholog) could be increased by addition of ATP, thereby enabling starch phosphorylation (Reimann et al., 2004
We propose that the newly identified PWD acts downstream of GWD and is involved in starch breakdown in leaves. Based on molecular modeling it has been suggested that phosphate linked to the C6 position aligns with the surface of double helical motifs in amylopectin, whereas phosphate esterified to the C3-position protrudes from the double helical structure. Thus, double helix packing should be more affected by C3-phosphorylation (Blennow et al., 2002
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants were cultivated in a growth cabinet under controlled conditions (12 h light/12 h dark, 20°C/16°C, 60%/70% relative humidity [day/night], and approximately 150 µmol quanta m2 s1). Seeds of the mutant SALK_110814 were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (http://arabidopsis.info, Nottingham, UK). Seeds of the Arabidopsis sex1-1 and sex1-3 mutants (Yu et al., 2001
[
Leaves (1030 g) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in a mortar. For the analysis of granule-bound proteins in vivo, starch was extracted as described (Ritte et al., 2000a
Five milligrams starch were resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.025% Triton X-100, and radiolabeled ATP as indicated in a total volume of 0.5 mL if not otherwise stated. The radiolabel was either [
Unless otherwise stated, dried Arabidopsis sex1-3 leaf starch granules were resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM ATP, and purified recombinant potato (Solanum tuberosum) GWD (Ritte et al., 2002
Arabidopsis leaves were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Leaves were ground in a mortar, and 3 to 4 volumes (v/w) binding buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithioerythritol, 2 mM benzamidine, 2 mM
Both in vitro-phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated sex1-3 leaf starch granules (50 mg each) were hydrated in binding buffer and were then mixed with freshly prepared Arabidopsis protein extract (total volume 0.8 mL, 410 mg protein mL1). Following incubation for 15 min at 4°C, unbound proteins were removed by centrifugation through a 4-mL Percoll-cushion (see above). The pelleted starch was washed in binding buffer (2 x 5 min, 4°C). Bound proteins were solubilized by incubating the starch granules with SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% [w/v] SDS, 10% [w/v] glycerol, 0.01% [w/v] bromphenol blue) for 15 min at RT with shaking. After centrifugation (5 min, 20,000g), the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and incubated at 95°C for 5 min. Equal amounts of both samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (9% acrylamide in the separation gel). Gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), and protein bands were cut out and subjected to tryptic digestion and matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization mass spectrometry analysis as described (Ritte et al., 2000b
Antibodies were raised in rabbits. A polyclonal antibody against the purified recombinant OK1 (PWD) was produced by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). For AGPase detection, an antibody raised against recombinant potato AGPase (Tiessen et al., 2002
Chloroplasts were isolated from Arabidopsis protoplasts using a protocol adapted from Kunst (1998) For chloroplast isolation, 25 mL PLB were added to the protoplast suspension, which was hand shaken vigorously for 1 min and then passed through a nylon net with 30-µm mesh width to rupture the protoplasts. The suspension was then centrifuged at 400g for 2 min at 4°C and the supernatant was removed. The chloroplast pellet was carefully resuspended in 4 mL PLB. As judged by microscopic inspection, the chloroplasts were highly intact.
Three volumes of protoplast or chloroplast suspension were mixed with 1 volume of 4-fold concentrated SDS-sample buffer. Equal amounts of proteins extracted from protoplasts or chloroplasts, respectively, and Mr marker proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% polyacrylamide). Western blots were performed essentially as described by Tiessen et al. (2002)
RNA was isolated from leaves of Arabidopsis wild type (ecotype Columbia) according to Logemann et al. (1987)
The expression vector containing the OK1 coding sequence was constructed by means of the GATEWAY technology (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The attB recombination sites were added to the OK1 cDNA in a PCR with OK1pGEM-T as template and the primers OK1EntryB1 (5'-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTCCGAGAGCATTGGCAGCCATTG-3') and OK1EntryB2 (5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTACAGAGGTTGTGGCCTTGAC-3'), using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche). The Entry Clone OK1pSPECTRE was obtained via the BP reaction with OK1attB PCR product and the Entry Clone vector pSPECTRE, which was derived from pDONR201 (Invitrogen) by replacing the PvuI/NruI fragment of the kanamycin resistance gene by the spectinomycin resistance gene. The OK1pDEST17 expression vector was created in the LR reaction with OK1pSPECTRE and pDEST17 (Invitrogen). Sequencing of OK1pDEST17 revealed a base transposition leading to an amino acid substitution (D143
E. coli BL21 Star (DE3; Invitrogen) cells were transformed with the OK1pDEST17 plasmid and incubated in 1L TB medium containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin overnight (30°C, 250 rpm). Expression of the OK1 protein was induced by adding isopropylthio-
The RNAi construct for silencing of the OK1 (PWD) gene was established by cloning a pair of short PCR-amplified OK1 cDNA fragments in opposite orientation into pHannibal (Wesley et al., 2001
Arabidopsis plants were transformed by the dipping method of Clough and Bent (1998)
In vitro phosphorylation of PWD (OK1) was analyzed essentially as described for GWD (Ritte et al., 2002
A photometric assay for the detection of orthophosphate (Parvin and Smith, 1969
HPAEC-PAD analysis was performed essentially as described (Ritte et al., 2000b
All leaves from wild-type and transgenic plants (810 plants each) were harvested at the end of the 12-h-light period. Starch granules were isolated. Seven milligrams starch each were hydrolyzed in 150 µL 0.7 N HCl for 2 h at 95°C. Three aliquots of each granule preparation were hydrolyzed. Following neutralization and filtration through 10-kD membranes (see above), Glc was determined and samples equivalent to 5 µmol Glc each were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD. The three different hydrolyzates per starch sample yielded highly reproducible results. The elution of Glc-3-P and Glc-6-P was monitored using authentic standards.
Leaves of the Arabidopsis sex1-3 mutant were harvested at the end of the light period (20 g fresh weight), proteins were extracted, precipitated, and desalted as described. However, ammonium sulfate precipitation was from 0% to 50% saturation. Further purification was achieved by affinity chromatography using 0.5 mL maltoheptaose immobilized on agarose beads (M-9676, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in a column with gravity flow. All steps were carried out at 4°C. The column was washed with 10 mL binding buffer, 2.5 mL protein extract (19.5 mg protein) was applied, and the flowthrough was applied once more. After washing with 10 mL binding buffer, bound proteins were eluted with Dextri maltose (ICN, Eschwege, Germany) dissolved in binding buffer (1 mL 10 mg/mL followed by 1 mL 50 mg/mL). Eluted proteins were further concentrated using spin column filters with an exclusion limit of 10 kD (Amicon YM-10,Microcon, Millipore), washed with 1 volume binding buffer, and again concentrated 4-fold with spin columns to give a final volume of 0.5 mL with a protein concentration of 50 µg/mL.
Measuring of the leaf starch content was done basically as described by Abel et al. (1996) Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject to the requisite permission from any third-party owners of all or parts of the material. Obtaining any permissions will be the responsibility of the requestor. Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank data libraries under accession number AJ635427.
We thank Anja Fröhlich and Torsten Schulze (MPI, Golm, Germany) for helping with plant transformation, Silke Gopp for the maintenance of plants, Anke Scharf for technical assistance, and Nora Eckermann (Plant Physiology, University of Potsdam, Germany) for advice in the HPAEC-PAD analysis. We are grateful to Jean Vidal (University of Paris) and Maria Ines Zanor (MPI) for the gift of the anti-PEPcarboxylase antibody, and Ben Trevaskis (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, Australia) for the gift of pSPECTRE vector plasmid. We thank the Salk Institute and the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center for provision of the T-DNA insertion line. Received November 3, 2004; returned for revision November 16, 2004; accepted November 16, 2004.
1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant nos. SFB 429 TPB2 to M.S. and TPB7 to G.R. and P.G.).
[w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.055954. * Corresponding author; e-mail ritte{at}rz.uni-potsdam.de; fax 493319772512.
Abel GJ, Springer F, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J (1996) Cloning and functional analysis of a cDNA encoding a novel 139 kDa starch synthase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J 10: 981991[CrossRef][Medline] Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Olsen CE, Møller BL (1998) Analysis of starch-bound glucose 3-phosphate and glucose 6-phosphate using controlled acid treatment combined with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography. J Chromatogr A 829: 385391[CrossRef] Blennow A, Nielsen TH, Baunsgaard L, Mikkelsen R, Engelsen SB (2002) Starch phosphorylation: a new front line in starch research. Trends Plant Sci 7: 445450[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735743[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dong Q, Schlueter SD, Brendel V (2004) PlantGDB, plant genome database and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D354D359 Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G (2000) Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 300: 10051016[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Engelsen SB, Madsen AO, Blennow A, Motawia MS, Møller BL, Larsen S (2003) The phosphorylation site in double helical amylopectin as investigated by a combined approach using chemical synthesis, crystallography and molecular modeling. FEBS Lett 541: 137144[Medline] Gleave AP (1992) A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organisational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol Biol 20: 12031207[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Goss NH, Evans CT, Wood HG (1980) Pyruvate phosphate dikinase: sequence of the histidyl peptide, the pyrophosphoryl and phosphoryl carrier. Biochemistry 19: 58055809[Medline] Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, von Zychlinski A, Christopher W, Sjölander K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S (2004) The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr Biol 14: 354362[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Kokesh FC, Cameron DA, Kakuda Y, Kuras PV (1978) Hydrolysis of alpha-D-glucopyranose 1,2-cyclic phosphate: the effect of pH and temperature on product distribution, and position of opening of phosphate diester ring in formation of D-glucose 2-phosphate. Carbohydr Res 62: 289300[CrossRef] Kunst L (1998) Preparation of physiologically active chloroplasts from Arabidopsis. Methods Mol Biol 82: 4348[Medline] Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1987) Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 163: 1620[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Lorberth R, Ritte G, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J (1998) Inhibition of a starch-granule-bound protein leads to modified starch and repression of cold sweetening. Nat Biotechnol 16: 473477[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, DeWeese-Scott C, Fedorova ND, Geer LY, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Lanczycki CJ, et al (2003) CDD: a curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 383387 Mikkelsen R, Baunsgaard L, Blennow A (2004) Functional characterization of alpha-glucan,water dikinase, the starch phosphorylating enzyme. Biochem J 377: 525532[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Narindrasorasak S, Bridger WA (1977) Phosphoenolypyruvate synthetase of Escherichia coli: molecular weight, subunit composition, and identification of phosphohistidine in phosphoenzyme intermediate. J Biol Chem 252: 31213127 Nielsen TH, Wischmann B, Enevoldsen K, Møller BL (1994) Starch phosphorylation in potato tubers proceeds concurrently with de novo biosynthesis of starch. Plant Physiol 105: 111117[Abstract] Parvin R, Smith RA (1969) Determination of inorganic phosphate in the presence of labile organic phosphates. Anal Biochem 27: 6572[CrossRef][Medline]
Reimann R, Hippler M, Machelett B, Appenroth KJ (2004) Light induces phosphorylation of glucan water dikinase, which precedes starch degradation in turions of the duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza. Plant Physiol 135: 121128 Ritte G, Eckermann N, Haebel S, Lorberth R, Steup M (2000b) Compartmentation of the starch-related R1 protein in higher plants. Starch-Stärke 52: 179185 |