|
|
||||||||
|
First published online March 18, 2005; 10.1104/pp.104.057232 Plant Physiology 137:1354-1362 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists Enhancing Resistance to Sclerotinia minor in Peanut by Expressing a Barley Oxalate Oxidase Gene1Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 (D.M.L., J.L.H., E.A.G.); and Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, Virginia 23437 (P.M.P.)
Sclerotinia minor Jagger is the causal agent of Sclerotinia blight, a highly destructive disease of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Based on evidence that oxalic acid is involved in the pathogenicity of many Sclerotinia species, our objectives were to recover transgenic peanut plants expressing an oxalic acid-degrading oxalate oxidase and to evaluate them for increased resistance to S. minor. Transformed plants were regenerated from embryogenic cultures of three Virginia peanut cultivars (Wilson, Perry, and NC-7). A colorimetric enzyme assay was used to screen for oxalate oxidase activity in leaf tissue. Candidate plants with a range of expression levels were chosen for further analysis. Integration of the transgene was confirmed by Southern-blot analysis, and gene expression was demonstrated in transformants by northern-blot analysis. A sensitive fluorescent enzyme assay was used to quantify expression levels for comparison to the colorimetric protocol. A detached leaflet assay tested whether transgene expression could limit lesion size resulting from direct application of oxalic acid. Lesion size was significantly reduced in transgenic plants compared to nontransformed controls (65%89% reduction at high oxalic acid concentrations). A second bioassay examined lesion size after inoculation of leaflets with S. minor mycelia. Lesion size was reduced by 75% to 97% in transformed plants, providing evidence that oxalate oxidase can confer enhanced resistance to Sclerotinia blight in peanut.
Sclerotinia blight of peanut, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Sclerotinia minor, is one of the most devastating diseases of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in Virginia, northeastern North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Texas. The fungicide fluazinam provides some protection (Smith et al., 1992
Oxalic acid is considered a pathogenicity factor in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and many other fungal pathogens (Maxwell and Lumsden, 1970
Oxalic acid may aid in infection through a number of proposed routes, including acidification to facilitate cell wall-degrading enzyme activity, through pH-mediated tissue damage, or via sequestration of Ca2+ ions (for review, see Dutton and Evans, 1996
Oxalate oxidase belongs to the germin family of proteins and catalyzes the degradation of oxalic acid to produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; Chiriboga, 1966
Reports of oxalate oxidase activity in response to pathogen attack have been restricted to cereals (Pundir, 1991
Further evidence for the utility of H2O2-generating enzymes in protective plant responses was provided by an examination of Glc oxidase expression in transgenic rice (Kachroo et al., 2003
Assay of Transformants for Oxalate Oxidase Activity Following establishment of embryogenic tissue culture lines for several Virginia peanut cultivars, embryos were transformed by particle bombardment with a plasmid vector containing the barley oxalate oxidase coding sequence. Selection and regeneration resulted in greater than 200 viable plants from three different cultivars. A simple colorimetric assay was used to screen hygromycin-resistant transformants for oxalate oxidase activity, and 40% to 60% of regenerated T0 plants showed elevated activity levels, depending on cultivar (data not shown). Eight transformed plants were chosen for a closer examination of enzyme activity (Fig. 1). Oxalate oxidase activity levels were higher in seven of the transformants than in all three nontransformed controls (Wilson, Perry, and NC-7). One additional regenerated plant, W1, was included as a nonexpressing control transformant.
Figure 1 shows a comparison of results from two different protocols for detection of oxalate oxidase activity. Both the colorimetric assay and the commercially available fluorescent kit relied on the detection of H2O2 produced by the activity of oxalate oxidase on the substrate, oxalic acid. The difference between the two protocols was the greater sensitivity and lower background of the fluorescent assay, which required 5-fold less reaction volume for a comparable response. Both methods are easy to perform in a microtiter format, which allowed for high throughput analysis of transformed material. The assay results were highly repeatable with comparable levels of expression in different leaves of the same plant. One line, W3, gave variable oxalate oxidase activity results at different sampling dates, with some leaflets showing moderate activity and some with only background levels, indicating possible chimerism (data not shown).
Genomic DNA samples from transformed and control peanut plants were analyzed by Southern-blot hybridization to demonstrate the integration of the oxalate oxidase transgene into the peanut genome. The number of insertion sites varied among transformants, as illustrated in Figure 2. The variable intensity of bands also suggested the possible insertion of multiple copies of the coding sequence in several lines, as is frequently observed for microprojectile bombardment. Hybridization patterns differed for the three Perry transformants, P9, P30, and P39, indicating that they were all independent transformation events. Hybridization patterns for two of the Wilson transformants (W3 and W100) were similar, raising the possibility that they may have originated from the same bombardment event. However, the difference in oxalate oxidase expression and other parameters tested below suggested that W3 and W100 originated from different events and that the patterns appeared similar due to the inability to resolve small size differences for large fragments on the gel. A similar consideration applies to transformant N6 obtained from bombardment of NC-7 cultures. The similarity of its hybridization pattern to P39 called into question whether it could have been inadvertently mislabeled during transfer to the greenhouse. We have retained the N6 designator while recognizing this caveat and will confirm its origin if progeny from this plant are used for any future studies.
Oxalate oxidase RNA expression was examined by northern-blot analysis to confirm the enzyme activity results. RNA from young leaflets was hybridized with the oxalate oxidase probe (Fig. 3). The seven oxalate oxidase-positive transformants showed the presence of a single 700-nucleotide RNA band that was absent from nontransformed controls. RNA expression levels were variable among lines. Line W3 showed very low levels of oxalate oxidase RNA, while P30 had the highest level of expression, consistent with enzyme activity results.
Resistance to Oxalic Acid
To determine whether transgenic peanut plants expressing oxalate oxidase showed increased resistance to the damaging effects of oxalic acid, varying concentrations of oxalic acid were applied to the surface of detached leaflets. Resistance was measured as a reduction in lesion size on transgenic plant leaflets compared to lesion size on nontransformed controls. Transformed peanut plants showed decreased damage from exogenously applied oxalic acid over a wide range of oxalic acid concentrations, as illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. The assays showed that expression of oxalate oxidase in transgenic peanut was able to neutralize the effects of oxalic acid at pathophysiological concentrations (Fig. 4A) and at concentrations up to 20-fold higher than normally found in infected tissue (Fig. 4, BD). At high (200 mM) oxalic acid concentrations, lesions were reduced by 65% to 89% compared to the corresponding nontransformed controls (Fig. 5A). Figure 5B shows the appearance of leaflets from several transformants following application of oxalic acid, illustrating the reduced lesion size. Liang et al. (2001)
Resistance to S. minor
To test for enhanced resistance to S. minor, thin agar plugs from the actively growing edge of a fungal culture were used to inoculate isolated leaflets from both transformed and nontransformed peanut plants. All the transgenic lines showed increased resistance to S. minor as measured by a reduction in lesion area (Fig. 6A). The type of lesion also varied between transgenic and control lines. Controls showed a large, continuous, tan-colored lesion, whereas the transgenic lines typically exhibited numerous smaller lesions resembling a hypersensitive response (Fig. 6B). The average reduction compared to the respective nontransformed control cultivars ranged from 75% for P39 to 97% for W100. The resistance results in peanut correlated well with previously published reports in other plants. Lesion size resulting from inoculation with the oxalate-secreting pathogen S. musiva was reduced by 63% in poplar expressing a wheat oxalate oxidase gene (Liang et al., 2001
Fertility of Transgenic Lines
Primary transgenic plants often show reduced fertility and lower yields than nontransformed plants. This can be due to epigenetic effects related to long tissue culture regimens or to the direct effect of the transgene itself, either because of position effects or the toxic nature of some transgene products. For example, Kachroo et al. (2003)
These studies demonstrated that the expression of a barley oxalate oxidase in transgenic peanut increased resistance to exogenously applied oxalic acid over a wide range of concentrations (up to 20 times pathophysiological levels). Transgenic peanut plants also exhibited enhanced resistance to S. minor as measured by reduced lesion size in detached leaflet assays. Peanut leaf inoculations were previously shown to serve as a reliable indicator of host resistance to S. minor (Hollowell and Shew, 2003
In addition to meeting the goal of enhancing resistance to S. minor, the project results also demonstrated the potential utility of oxalic acid as a screen for fungal disease resistance. Previous studies used wilting during immersion of cut bean seedlings in 20 mM oxalic acid as a screen for white mold resistance (Kolkman and Kelly, 2000
Due to the absence of obvious deleterious effects of the oxalate oxidase transgene in most peanut transformants, we have used it as a sensitive marker for following transformation and regeneration, and as a reporter gene to evaluate expression in transformants. It is inexpensive and easy to assay, allowing screening of many progeny plants for transgene segregation patterns during generation of sufficient peanut seeds for field studies. The utility of oxalate oxidase as a reporter gene and its advantages over luciferase,
As encouraging as these results are in support of oxalate oxidase as a useful resistance gene, a limitation to the experiments is that the leaflet assays were performed under highly controlled conditions, including constant temperature, humidity, and use of a single fungal isolate. This will not be the case in field conditions. S. minor is an obligate necrotrophic fungus and requires dead or decaying tissue for successful establishment of infection. Variable growth and environmental conditions will come into play in a field production situation. Oxalic acid is considered a pathogenicity factor for Sclerotinia spp. (Godoy et al., 1990
The oxalate oxidase gene may also play a role in cell wall defense unrelated to its enzyme activity. For example, Schweizer et al. (1999) Although there are probably multiple factors involved in the establishment of fungal infection, this study demonstrates the importance of oxalic acid as a pathogenicity factor in infection of peanut by S. minor, and that counteracting the effects of oxalic acid through oxalate oxidase expression can enhance resistance to injury and establishment of fungal infection. Further studies are in progress to assess disease resistance and peanut yields for a number of oxalate oxidase-expressing peanut transformants under field conditions.
Tissue Culture and Regeneration Embryos from mature seeds of Virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars (NC-7, Wilson, and Perry) were surface sterilized by soaking the seeds in 70% ethanol for 5 min, twice in 1% dichloroisocyanuric acid for 5 min, and finally rinsing the seeds with sterile distilled water. Following sterilization, the embryo was excised and the radicle end removed. Excised embryos were washed in 1% dichloroisocyanuric acid for 30 s and rinsed with three volumes of sterile distilled water. All reagents for tissue culture and subsequent assays were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis) unless otherwise specified.
Embryogenic callus was induced by culturing the mature embryos on MP3 medium, which contained Murashige and Skoog (MS; Murashige and Skoog, 1962
Maintenance, bombardment, and regeneration of peanut embryogenic cultures were conducted as described previously (Livingstone and Birch, 1999
RNA was purified from germinating barley seedlings (RNeasy kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for amplification of the oxalate oxidase coding region by reverse transcription-PCR. Oligonucleotide primers were designed from the published sequence for barley oxalate oxidase (accession no. Y14203; Zhou et al., 1998
Embryogenic callus was bombarded with the pOxOx plasmid DNA that had been coated onto 1-µm-diameter tungsten microparticles. Particles were accelerated using a PDS-1000/He Particle Delivery System and an 1,100-psi rupture disc according to manufacturer's recommendations (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Callus was incubated on MP3 medium supplemented with 0.4 M D-mannitol for bombardment. After 2 h of recovery, callus was transferred to MS medium for 2 to 3 d and then plated onto MP3 medium supplemented with filter-sterilized hygromycin B at a concentration of 40 mg L1 for selection. After 3 to 6 months, transformed somatic embryos were regenerated on antibiotic-free medium as described previously (Livingstone and Birch, 1999
DNA was extracted by a modification of the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide method described by Murray and Thompson (1980)
To confirm integration of the transgene in peanut transformants, genomic DNA was digested with BstXI. BstXI cuts the pOxOx plasmid once in the oxalate oxidase coding sequence, adjacent to the region amplified as the hybridization probe. DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to positively charged nylon membranes (Nytran supercharge; Schleicher and Schuell BioScience, Keene, NH). The membrane was hybridized with a 32P-labeled oxalate oxidase probe. The probe sequence was a 470-bp fragment amplified by PCR using puReTaqReady-To-Go PCR beads (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) with forward primer 5'CCCTCTACAGGACTTCTGCG3' and reverse primer 5'CTGGCTGTTGAAGGAACACAA3'. The PCR product was purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and labeled using a Prime-It RmT Random Primer labeling kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and radiolabeled 32P-dCTP (Perkin Elmer, Boston). Hybridization and subsequent washes were performed at 65°C using conditions described by Sambrook et al. (1989)
RNA was separated by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to positively charged nylon membranes as described previously (Sambrook et al., 1989
To determine oxalate oxidase activity in transgenic peanut plants, leaf discs (5 mm diameter) were placed in 1.5-mL microfuge tubes and assayed using a modification of the procedure by Sugiura et al. (1979) An alternative assay for release of H2O2 as a measure of oxalate oxidase activity was performed with an Amplex Red kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Amplex Red in the presence of H2O2 and horseradish peroxidase forms the fluorescent compound resorufin. For the fluorescent assay, leaf discs were incubated in microtiter wells with the same assay buffer as described above. After incubation of leaf discs with oxalic acid substrate, a 20-µL aliquot of each sample was transferred with a multichannel pipettor to a fresh plate and brought to a volume of 50 µL with kit reaction buffer. To start the detection reaction, 50 µL of the Amplex Red/horseradish peroxidase reagent was added and incubated for 30 min in the dark. Fluorescence was detected in a plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT), using a 530-nm excitation filter and 590-nm emission filter. A standard curve allowed calculation of the total H2O2 released. The products of the Amplex Red reaction can also be measured spectrophotometrically at 550 nm due to the high extinction coefficient.
Leaflet assays were conducted to assess the ability of oxalate oxidase expression to prevent damage in response to application of oxalic acid to plant tissue. Detached peanut leaflets were arranged on an inverted weigh boat in 15-cm petri dishes containing dampened paper towels. Eight leaflets were used for each plant line, one for each concentration of oxalic acid. Each leaflet was wounded in four locations on the abaxial surface with an 18-gauge needle, and 15 µL of oxalic acid was applied to each wound. For oxalic acid concentrations in the 0 to 200 mM range, the leaflets were incubated for 6 h at room temperature. For concentrations in the 0 to 10 mM range, leaflets were incubated for 48 h at room temperature. To quantify lesion size, leaflets were washed and viewed with a Zeiss Stemi SV 11 dissecting microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were recorded with an attached Scion video camera and imaging software (Scion, Frederick, MD). The lesion area was traced with the computer mouse on the image displayed on the computer monitor. The delimited area was calculated in square pixels by the software package and converted to mm2.
Fungal assays were performed using detached leaflets inoculated with an agar plug of S. minor mycelia. S. minor cultures were grown on thin potato dextrose agar plates and 5-mm plugs taken from the actively growing edge. Leaflets were wounded with an 18-gauge needle, and plugs were placed on the adaxial surface, near the midvein. Eight leaflets were inoculated for each plant line tested using a minimal quantity of agar in each plug. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 19°C, and lesion area was measured as in the oxalic acid assays above.
We thank Dr. Carla Hegeman for assistance in cloning the oxalate oxidase cDNA. Received November 30, 2004; returned for revision January 24, 2005; accepted January 30, 2005.
1 This work was supported by the Virginia Agricultural Council, the Virginia Peanut Growers Association, and the National Peanut Board.
2 Present address: School of Life Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Old. 4067, Australia. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.057232. * Corresponding author; e-mail egrabau{at}vt.edu; fax 5402317126.
Bateman DF, Beer SV (1965) Simultaneous production and synergistic action of oxalic acid and polygalacturonase during pathogenesis by Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 55: 204211[Web of Science][Medline] Bennett AR, Hindal DF (1989) Mycelial growth and oxalate production by five strains of Cryphonectria parasitica in selected liquid culture media. Mycologia 81: 554560 Berna A, Bernier F (1999) Regulation by biotic and abiotic stress of a wheat germin gene encoding oxalate oxidase, a H2O2-producing enzyme. Plant Mol Biol 39: 539549[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cessna SG, Sears VE, Dickman MB, Low PS (2000) Oxalic acid, a pathogenicity factor for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, suppresses the oxidative burst of the host plant. Plant Cell 12: 21912199 Chenault KD, Burns JA, Melouk HA, Payton ME (2002) Hydrolase activity in transgenic peanut. Peanut Sci 29: 8995 Chiriboga J (1966) Purification and properties of oxalic acid oxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys 116: 516523[CrossRef][Medline] Dessalegne L, Wetten AC, Caligari PDS (1997) Production of transgenic tomatoes expressing oxalate oxidase. Acta Hortic 447: 457458 Donaldson PA, Anderson T, Lane BG, Davidson AL, Simmonds DH (2001) Soybean plants expressing an active oligomeric oxalate oxidase from the wheat gf-2.8 (germin) gene are resistant to the oxalate-secreting pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 59: 297307[CrossRef] Dumas B, Freyssinet G, Pallett KE (1995) Tissue-specific expression of germin-like oxalate oxidase during development and fungal infection of barley seedlings. Plant Physiol 107: 10911096[Abstract] Dutton MV, Evans CS (1996) Oxalate production by fungi: its role in pathogenicity and ecology in the soil environment. Can J Microbiol 42: 881895 Godoy G, Steadman JR, Dickman MB, Dam R (1990) Use of mutants to demonstrate the role of oxalic acid in pathogenicity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 37: 179191[CrossRef]
Guimarães RL, Stotz HU (2004) Oxalate production by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum deregulates guard cells during infection. Plant Physiol 136: 37033711 Havir EA, Anagnostakis SL (1985) Oxaloacetate acetylhydrolase activity in virulent and hypovirulent strains of Endothia (Cryphonectria) parasitica. Physiol Plant Pathol 26: 19 Hollowell JE, Shew BB (2003) Evaluating isolate aggressiveness and host resistance from peanut leaflet inoculations with Sclerotinia minor. Plant Dis 87: 402406 Hollowell JE, Smith MR, Shew BB (2001) Oxalic acid production by nine isolates of Sclerotinia minor. Proc Am Peanut Res Ed Soc 33: 24
Hu X, Bidney DL, Yalpani N, Duvick JP, Crasta O, Folkerts O, Lu G (2003) Overexpression of a gene encoding hydrogen peroxide-generating oxalate oxidase evokes defense responses in sunflower. Plant Physiol 133: 170181 Hurkman WJ, Lane BG, Tanaka CK (1994) Nucleotide sequence of a transcript encoding a germin-like protein that is present in salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) roots. Plant Physiol 104: 803804[CrossRef][Medline] Ikotun T (1984) Production of oxalic acid by Penicillium oxalicum in culture and in infected yam tissue and interaction with macerating enzyme. Mycopathologia 88: 914[CrossRef] Kachroo A, He Z, Patkar R, Zhu Q, Zhong J, Li D, Ronald P, Lamb C, Chattoo BB (2003) Induction of H2O2 in transgenic rice leads to cell death and enhanced resistance to both bacterial and fungal pathogens. Transgenic Res 12: 577586[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kesarwani M, Azam M, Natarajan K, Mehta A, Datta A (2000) An oxalate decarboxylase from Collybia velutipes: molecular cloning and its overexpression to confer resistance to fungal infection in transgenic tobacco and tomato. J Biol Chem 275: 72307238
Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2000) An indirect test using oxalate to determine physiological resistance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 40: 281285 Kurian P, Stelzig DA (1979) The synergistic role of oxalic acid and endopolygalacturonase in bean leaves infected by Cristulariella pyramidalis. Phytopathology 69: 13011304
Lane BG, Dunwell JM, Ray JA, Schmitt MR, Cuming AC (1993) Germin, a protein marker of early plant development, is an oxalate oxidase. J Biol Chem 268: 1223912242 Lane BG (1994) Oxalate, germin, and the extracellular matrix of higher plants. FASEB J 5: 294301 Lane BG (2000) Oxalate oxidases and differentiating surface structure in wheat: germins. Biochem J 349: 309321[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C (1994) H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Cell 79: 583593[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Li J, Hegeman CE, Hanlon RW, Lacy GH, Denbow DM, Grabau EA (1997) Secretion of active recombinant phytase from soybean cell-suspension cultures. Plant Physiol 114: 11031111[Abstract] Liang H, Maynard CA, Allen RD, Powell WA (2001) Increased Septoria musiva resistance in transgenic hybrid poplar leaves expressing a wheat oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Mol Biol 45: 619629[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Livingstone DM, Birch RG (1999) Efficient transformation and regeneration of diverse cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by particle bombardment into embryogenic callus produced from mature seeds. Mol Breed 5: 4351 Lu G (2003) Engineering Sclerotinia sclerotiorum resistance in oilseed crops. Afr J Biotechnol 2: 509516 Lumsden RD (1979) Histology and physiology of pathogenesis in plant diseases caused by Sclerotinia species. Phytopathology 69: 890896 Maxwell DP, Lumsden RD (1970) Oxalic acid production by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in infected bean and in culture. Phytopathology 60: 13951398 Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473497[CrossRef]
Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 43214325 Noyes RD, Hancock JG (1981) Role of oxalic acid in the Sclerotinia wilt of sunflower. Physiol Plant Pathol 18: 123132 Porter DM, Melouk HA (1997) Sclerotinia blight. In N Kokkalis-Burelle, DM Porter, R Rodriguez-Kabana, DH Smith, P Subrahmanyam, eds, Compendium of Peanut Diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 3436 Pundir CS (1991) Purification and properties of oxalate oxidase from Sorghum leaves. Phytochemistry 30: 10651067[CrossRef] Ramputh AI, Arnason JT, Cass L, Simmonds JA (2002) Reduced herbivory of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) on corn transformed with germin, a wheat oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Sci 162: 431440[CrossRef] Rao DV, Tewari JP (1987) Production of oxalic acid by Mycena citricolor, causal agent of American leaf spot of coffee. Phytopathology 77: 780785 Ritschkoff A-C, Rättö M, Buchert J, Viikari L (1995) Effect of carbon source on the production of oxalic acid and hydrogen peroxide by brown-rot fungus Poria placenta. J Biotechnol 40: 179186[CrossRef] Rollins JA (2003) The Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Pac 1 gene is required for sclerotial development and virulence. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 16: 785795[Medline] Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY Schweizer P, Christoffel A, Dudler R (1999) Transient expression of members of the germin-like gene family in epidermal cells of wheat confers disease resistance. Plant J 20: 541552[CrossRef][Medline] Simmonds J, Cass L, Routly E, Hubbard K, Donaldson P, Bancroft B, Davidson A, Hubbard S, Simmonds D (2004) Oxalate oxidase: a novel reporter gene for monocot and dicot transformations. Mol Breed 13: 7991 Smith FD, Phipps PM, Stipes RJ (1992) Fluazinam: a new fungicide for control of sclerotinia blight and other soil borne diseases of peanut. Peanut Sci 19: 115120 Stone HE, Armentrout VN (1985) Production of oxalic acid by Sclerotium cepivorum during infection of onion. Mycologia 77: 526530 Sugiura M, Yamamura H, Harano K, Sasaki M, Morikawa M, Tsuboi M (1979) Purification and properties of oxalate oxidase from barley seedlings. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 27: 20032007 Thompson C, Dunwell JM, Johnstone CE, Lay V, Schmitt M, Watson H, Nisbet G (1995) Degradation of oxalic acid by transgenic oilseed rape plants expressing oxalate oxidase. Euphytica 85: 169172[CrossRef] Wei YD, Zhang Z, Anderson CH, Schmelzer E, Gregerson PL, Collinge DB, Smedegaard-Peterson V, Thordal-Christensen H (1998) An epidermis/papilla-specific oxalate oxidase-like protein in the defense response of barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus. Plant Mol Biol 36: 101112[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Zaghmout OF, Dang PD, Allen RD (1997) Expression of oxalate oxidase in transgenic plants provides resistance to oxalic acid and oxalate-producing fungi (abstract no. 1152). Plant Physiol (Suppl) 114: 227 Zhang Z, Collinge DB, Thordal-Christensen H (1995) Germin-like oxalate oxidase, a H2O2-producing enzyme, accumulates in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus. Plant J 8: 139145
Zhou F, Zhang Z, Gregersen PL, Mikkelsen JD, de Neergaard E, Collinge DB, Thordal-Christensen H (1998) Molecular characterization of the oxalate oxidase involved in the response of barley to the powdery mildew fungus. Plant Physiol 117: 3341 Zhu Q, Maher EA, Masoud S, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ (1994) Enhanced protection against fungal attack by constitutive co-expression of chitinase and glucanase genes in transgenic tobacco. Nat Biotechnol 12: 807812[CrossRef] Related articles in Plant Physiol.:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|