| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
First published online July 22, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.062273 Plant Physiology 138:2005-2018 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists SEC8, a Subunit of the Putative Arabidopsis Exocyst Complex, Facilitates Pollen Germination and Competitive Pollen Tube Growth1,[w]Department of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 (R.A.C., J.E.F.); Department of Plant Physiology, Charles University, Praha 2, CZ–128 44, Czech Republic (L.S., V.Z.); and Laboratory of Cell Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha 6, CZ–165 02, Czech Republic (L.S., V.Z.)
The exocyst, a complex of eight proteins, contributes to the morphogenesis of polarized cells in a broad range of eukaryotes. In these organisms, the exocyst appears to facilitate vesicle docking at the plasma membrane during exocytosis. Although we had identified orthologs for each of the eight exocyst components in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), no function has been demonstrated for any of them in plants. The gene encoding one exocyst component ortholog, AtSEC8, is expressed in pollen and vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis. Genetic studies utilizing an allelic series of six independent T-DNA mutations reveal a role for SEC8 in male gametophyte function. Three T-DNA insertions in SEC8 cause an absolute, male-specific transmission defect that can be complemented by expression of SEC8 from the LAT52 pollen promoter. Microscopic analysis shows no obvious abnormalities in the microgametogenesis of the SEC8 mutants, and the mutant pollen grains appear to respond to the signals that initiate germination. However, in vivo assays indicate that these mutant pollen grains are unable to germinate a pollen tube. The other three T-DNA insertions are associated with a partial transmission defect, such that the mutant allele is transmitted through the pollen at a reduced frequency. The partial transmission defect is only evident when mutant gametophytes must compete with wild-type gametophytes, and arises in part from a reduced pollen tube growth rate. These data support the hypothesis that one function of the putative plant exocyst is to facilitate the initiation and maintenance of the polarized growth of pollen tubes.
Asymmetrical growth and development in eukaryotic cells is established through localized cell expansion driven by polarized exocytosis/endocytosis. Golgi-generated secretory vesicles are delivered to a specific region of the plasma membrane, where their fusion with the plasma membrane results in the incorporation of new membrane lipids and proteins to that region. In many organisms, polarized exocytosis has been found to require the involvement of a protein complex known as the exocyst (for review, see Hsu et al., 2004  ). The exocyst (first described in TerBush et al., 1996) is composed of eight proteins, Sec3, Sec5, Sec6, Sec8, Sec10, Sec15, Exo70, and Exo84, most of which were initially identified as temperature-sensitive secretory mutants of the budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; for review, see Schekman and Novick, 2004). In yeast, mutation of any one of the exocyst components leads to arrested formation of the polarly growing bud and the accumulation of secretory vesicles (TerBush et al., 1996; Guo et al., 1999). Orthologs for genes encoding all eight of the exocyst components have subsequently been identified in a growing number of eukaryotes and implicated in a variety of cellular processes involving polarized exocytosis. For example, the exocyst is associated with neurite outgrowth in neurons from Drosophila melanogaster (Murthy et al., 2003) and in differentiated PC12 cells (Vega and Hsu, 2001). In cultured Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, the exocyst mediates filopodia formation induced by the GTPase RalA and tumor necrosis factor- (Sugihara et al., 2002). In adipocytes, the exocyst is implicated in the targeted exocytosis of the Glc transporter Glut4 to the plasma membrane in response to insulin (Inoue et al., 2003). In general, the exocyst appears to be involved in polarized exocytosis to regions of the plasma membrane experiencing rapid polarized growth or requiring tightly controlled delivery of specific membrane components. On the basis of subcellular localization and molecular associations, it has been proposed that the exocyst functions as a tethering protein complex, targeting incoming secretory vesicles to specific sites on the plasma membrane prior to the docking and fusion events mediated by SNARES (Pfeffer, 1999; Whyte and Munro, 2002; Hsu et al., 2004).
Orthologs for genes encoding all components of the exocyst have been identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Jurgens and Geldner, 2002
The study of Sec8 orthologs has played a key role in establishing functional roles for the exocyst in nonplant species. In MDCK epithelial cells, Sec8 localization studies (Yeaman et al., 2004 We therefore used T-DNA insertional mutations of AtSEC8 to test the hypothesis that the exocyst is involved in tip growth in plants. We focused our attention on pollen, i.e. the male gametophyte. The germination of the pollen grain to form a pollen tube and the growth of the pollen tube are both processes that could in theory involve the exocyst. Additionally, we considered the possibility that the putative plant exocyst could be involved in cytokinesis during microgametogenesis. Ultimately, our genetic and microscopic studies revealed that AtSEC8 is required for both pollen germination and competitive pollen tube growth, supporting our hypothesis.
AtSEC8 Is Expressed in Pollen and Can Be Investigated Using Reverse Genetics
Recent microarray expression analyses have explored the pollen transcriptome in Arabidopsis at various stages of pollen development (Honys and Twell, 2004
We focused our attention on the large, single-copy AtSEC8 gene (hereafter referred to simply as SEC8) to begin testing the hypothesis that the plant exocyst is crucial for polarized plant cell growth, specifically the growth of the pollen tube. We employed a reverse genetics approach, searching the Salk collection (Alonso et al., 2003 ) to obtain six T-DNA insertional mutant lines in the gene. The location and insertional nature of each T-DNA mutation was verified by sequencing from both T-DNA borders (Fig. 2A). Amino acid sequences predicted from assembled expressed sequence tag (EST) contigs for a number of plant species show a high degree of conservation in a region likely to form a series of -helices, which were also predicted to be interrupted by the insertion mutations (Fig. 2B). Conservation fell off in the short region between -m3 and the other three insertions (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Mutations in SEC8 Cause a Male-Specific Transmission Defect A phenotype for the SEC8 mutants was revealed when genetic studies showed that the mutant alleles were not transmitted to progeny in the expected Mendelian ratios (Table I). Genotyping for individual plants in the progeny populations was achieved by PCR (Fig. 3E), using sets of primers annealing to DNA within the insert (i.e. the T-DNA sequence) and on either side of the insertion site. Self-crosses of plants heterozygous for the sec8-m1, -m2, or -m3 alleles failed to produce homozygous mutant progeny (Table I). To determine whether the defect was due to a problem in male and/or female gametogenesis, reciprocal outcrosses were performed between plants heterozygous for each mutant SEC8 allele and wild-type Columbia-0 plants. When wild-type pollen was used to pollinate the stigma of a SEC8 heterozygote, the progeny demonstrated the expected 1:1 Mendelian ratio of heterozygotes to wild-type homozygotes for all six mutant alleles (Table I). Thus, no detectable defect was associated with mutation of SEC8 in the female gametophyte.
In contrast, a strong male-specific transmission defect was evident in the reciprocal outcrosses. When the pollen of a mutant heterozygote was used on a wild-type stigma, there were significantly fewer heterozygotes in the progeny than predicted by Mendelian genetics (Table I). For the -m1, -m2, and -m3 alleles, the transmission defect was absolute, and the mutant allele never appeared in the progeny (combined n = 326). Interestingly, even though we had not detected a transmission defect in the self-crossed progeny, the -m4, -m5, and -m6 alleles all demonstrated a partial male-specific transmission defect when outcrossed, with the mutant allele appearing at frequencies of 18%, 22%, and 31%, respectively. The transmission defect was maintained through at least three generations for each allele. These data argued strongly for an important functional role for SEC8 in the male gametophyte. When the six mutant alleles were compared, it was notable that the transmission defect became less severe as the site of the insertion got closer to the 3'-end of the gene. The differences in phenotypic severity among the six alleles raised the possibility that the three 5'-most insertions generated null alleles, whereas the three other insertions, located in a relatively small region in the 3'-end of the gene, were associated with partially functional (hypomorphic) alleles. In this scenario, truncated transcripts from the hypomorphic alleles should be detectable in plants homozygous for the sec8-m4, -m5, and -m6 alleles. To test this and to confirm the microarray expression data, we initially conducted reverse transcription (RT)-PCR on RNA samples from several wild-type tissues. SEC8 transcript was detectable in all samples tested, including RNA from pollen (Fig. 3A). We then utilized two different primer pairs, one located at the extreme 3'-end and another further 5', producing products designated B and A, respectively (Fig. 3B), to evaluate the presence of truncated transcripts in plants homozygous for the sec8-m4, -m5, or -m6 allele. As predicted, RT-PCR using the 5'-most primer pair on immature floral tissue samples from the mutants produced a PCR product of the same size as that obtained for wild-type plants. However, no PCR product was detected when primers located on opposite sides of the insertion sites were used on the same samples, as might be expected for truncated transcripts (Fig. 3, C and D). To confirm the presence of the truncated transcripts, PCR products were amplified from each hypomorph, using a 5'-SEC8 primer along with a T-DNA-annealing primer, and sequenced. Each allele produced a transcript composed of truncated SEC8 sequence fused to a portion of the T-DNA sequence at the 3'-end. Using these sequences, we predicted that the -m4, -m5, and -m6 mutations alter the C terminus of the wild-type protein by truncating it by 70, 63, or 45 amino acids, respectively, and by adding 16, 15, or 25 amino acids translated from the T-DNA sequence (Fig. 2A; Supplemental Fig. 3). We could not definitively test whether sec8-m1, -m2, and -m3 produced transcripts because we could not generate homozygotes for these three putative null SEC8 alleles. However, no PCR products were detected in attempts to isolate truncated transcripts containing T-DNA sequences from plants heterozygous for these alleles (data not shown). Additional data supporting the idea that the three 5'-most insertions were null alleles were obtained from male outcrosses of a sec8-m3/sec8-m4 trans-heterozygote. Even when in the environment of reduced pollen competition provided by the partial -m4 allele (see below), we never saw transmission of the -m3 allele through the pollen (n = 98 progeny).
To verify that the transmission defect was indeed due to mutation of SEC8, and not a tightly linked but unrelated mutation, a complementation experiment was performed. A construct containing the wild-type SEC8 coding sequence driven by the pollen-specific LAT52 promoter (Twell et al., 1991
Male-specific transmission defects can arise at any of several stages of male gametophytic development, including microgametogenesis, pollen germination, or pollen tube growth (for review, see McCormick, 2004
To evaluate early male gametophyte development, the immature pollen of sec8-m3 heterozygotes and of homozygous wild-type siblings was compared. We used aniline blue staining of callose to detect the cytokinetic cell plate in developing pollen (Park and Twell, 2001
The Absolute Transmission Defect in Plants Carrying sec8-m3 Is Associated with a Pollen Germination Defect
The absence of a sec8 mutant phenotype in mature pollen led us to evaluate the ability of mutant pollen to germinate and grow pollen tubes postpollination. In vitro techniques have been widely employed to evaluate pollen germination (Johnson-Brousseau and McCormick, 2004
Stigmas were pollinated with pollen from either a sec8-m3 heterozygote or its wild-type sibling (n = 18 of each) and then stained after 4 h. In this assay, 84% (SE 1.8%) of pollen grains from a homozygous wild-type sibling plant germinated compared with only 46% (SE 2.0%) of the pollen from the sec8-m3 heterozygote (Fig. 4H). This implies that the ungerminated half of the pollen from the heterozygote consisted primarily of the mutant gametophytes. Similar experiments using aniline blue staining to score for germinated pollen tubes also showed a significant decrease in germination in mutant heterozygotes (data not shown). To verify that the pollen germination defect was due to the sec8-m3 mutation, we also scored for germination in the complemented LAT52::SEC8 line. Due to independent assortment, only one-half of the sec8-m3 pollen from the transgenic heterozygote should contain the LAT52::SEC8 construct. Thus, complementation should increase the rate of germination to a level midway between that of the sec8-m3 heterozygote and wild type. As predicted, 66% (SE 2.5%) of pollen grains from the transgenic heterozygote germinated (Fig. 4H). These results confirmed that the absolute transmission defect observed for the sec8-m3 mutant allele is due to a defect in pollen germination.
We were curious to know whether the sec8-m3 mutant pollen was unable to germinate due to an inability to generate tip growth or, alternatively, due to an inability to perceive stigma-originating signals initiating germination. These alternatives might be distinguishable by examining the ultrastructure of mutant pollen that failed to germinate after placement on a stigma. TEM was, therefore, employed to compare pollen from sec8-m3 heterozygotes and wild-type siblings after germination in vivo (Fig. 5). The TEM images, combined with the Alexander staining results (Fig. 4, A–E), indicated a likely progression of ultrastructural changes that occur during wild-type pollen germination. Following placement of the pollen on the stigma, vacuoles within the pollen grains appeared to enlarge, to become prominent electron-transparent regions. Initially, organelles and small membrane-bound structures were readily observable (Fig. 5, A and B), but, as the vacuoles continued to enlarge, the small membrane-bound structures became much less apparent. The growing vacuoles appeared to coalesce to form a space next to the pollen cell wall, often more prominent on one side of the germinating pollen grain and coincident with the movement of the cytoplasm into the growing pollen tube (Fig. 5, D, E, and G). Ultimately, a large vacuole entirely filled the pollen grain (Fig. 5H). The enlargement of the vacuolar space, ultimately separating the cytoplasm from the pollen wall, was observed with both TEM and Alexander staining (Fig. 4, A–E), suggesting that this change was not an artifact of the chemical fixation used to prepare the pollen for TEM.
The initial TEM examination of pollen from a sec8-m3 heterozygote following pollination revealed no obvious novel phenotypes specific to the mutant. Nongerminating pollen grains were more prevalent in the pollen from a mutant heterozygote, as expected, but they exhibited stages of vacuolar development similar to the wild-type grains. To be more quantitative, we subsequently used TEM to categorize pollen from a sec8-m3 heterozygote (n = 59) and from a wild-type sibling (n = 65) into various phenotypic classes displayed at 2 h after pollination (Table II). Pollen grains showing an enlarged vacuolar space next to the pollen cell wall were considered to have germinated. Based upon this criterion, only 11% percent of the wild-type pollen grains failed to germinate (i.e. lacked a large, cell wall-associated vacuole), whereas 32% from the sec8-m3 heterozygote had not germinated, a statistically significant difference (
The Partial Transmission Defect in sec8-m4 Heterozygotes Results from Reduced Competitive Ability and Is Associated with a Reduced Pollen Tube Growth Rate The partial transmission defect evident in the sec8-m4, -m5, and -m6 mutants allowed the generation of plants homozygous for these mutant alleles. Based on comparisons of silique length, seed count, incidence of seed gaps, and incidence of deformed seeds (Supplemental Table I), the siliques produced by plants homozygous for each of the three hypomorphic alleles were indistinguishable from those of their wild-type siblings. Evidently, the mutant pollen from homozygous plants is fully capable of performing its functions, leading to a fully fertilized ovary. Given that the defect was only revealed in an outcross using pollen from a heterozygote, we hypothesized that pollen carrying these alleles expressed a competitive defect, i.e. one that made it less likely to accomplish fertilization in the presence of wild-type pollen. The importance of competition in the sec8-m4 transmission phenotype was demonstrated in two experiments. First, competition in a set of outcrosses was reduced by applying only a sparse quantity of pollen from a sec8-m4 heterozygote to a wild-type stigma. In the standard outcross, competition is accentuated by the application of a large quantity of pollen simultaneously to the stigma. Reducing competition by applying only a sparse quantity of pollen was therefore predicted to increase the percentage of heterozygotes in the outcross progeny. However, it is difficult to assess the exact quantity of pollen applied to the stigma in an outcross. We made the assumption that, when the number of pollen grains applied is limiting (i.e. less than the number of available ovules), then the number of seeds ultimately produced is an indirect indicator of the amount of pollen applied. Figure 6 is a plot of the percentage of heterozygotes present in the outcross progeny of a set of sparse pollen and excess pollen crosses as a function of seed count in the silique. The graph indicates that the reduced competition associated with sparse pollination was associated with an increase in the transmission of the mutant allele through the pollen.
In a second experiment, competition was increased in self-crosses by manually applying a large excess of pollen to the stigma of sec8-m4 heterozygotes. We hypothesized that a naturally occurring self-cross creates a less competitive situation in which there is a more gradual and lighter deposition of pollen onto the stigma. This reduced competition in a natural cross would explain the 23% frequency of mutant homozygotes from our initial self-crosses (Table I), which is far greater than would be predicted (approximately 9%) based on the outcross transmission rate. We predicted that the increased competition created by applying a large excess of pollen would favor the wild-type pollen over the sec8-m4 pollen and thereby result in decreased transmission of the mutant allele when compared with natural self-pollination of the same plant. The observed genotypes of progeny of natural self-pollination (n = 90) were in the expected Mendelian ratio (Table III). The manual self-pollination (n = 156), however, showed decreased transmission of the mutant allele and produced progeny in a genotypic ratio of approximately 2 (+/+) to 3 (+/m4) to 1 (m4/m4), significantly different from the Mendelian ratio (  2 = 9.37, P < 0.01). Thus, two lines of evidence support the hypothesis that the partial transmission defect of the sec8-m4 allele is due to a decreased ability to compete with wild-type pollen.
The reduced ability of pollen carrying the sec8-m4 allele to compete with wild-type pollen could conceivably arise from defects in pollen germination, pollen tube growth, or pollen tube guidance. However, there was no defect in the pollen germination of sec8-m4 pollen detected in in vivo pollen germination assays 4 h after pollination (Fig. 4H), or using aniline blue staining 2 h after pollination (data not shown). Therefore, we turned our attention to evaluating postgermination characteristics of the sec8-m4 gametophytes. To evaluate the possibility that the pollen tube growth rate of sec8-m4 gametophytes was slower than wild type, we compared the growth rate of pollen tubes from wild-type and homozygous mutant siblings (Fig. 7). A semi in vivo method was employed in which pollen was germinated on a stigma, the stigma was placed on a slide coated with growth media, and pollen tubes were subsequently visualized as they grew out from the stigma onto the media. Wild-type pollen (n = 100 pollen tubes) demonstrated a mean growth rate of 2.0 µm min–1 (SE, 0.06 µm min–1), compared to sec8-m4 pollen (n = 81 pollen tubes), which had a mean growth rate of 1.4 µm min–1 (SE, 0.04 µm min–1). Thus the mutant pollen has a significantly lower growth rate (P = 5 x 10–11, t test) compared to pollen of a wild-type sibling.
In vivo differences in pollen tube growth rates between the wild-type and mutant pollen of a heterozygote can be evidenced by a nonrandom distribution of mutant seeds within the resultant silique (e.g. Goubet et al., 2003 ). Slower growing pollen tubes from mutant gametophytes result in the mutant allele being more prevalent in seeds from the top half (stigma end) of the silique, relative to the bottom half. Therefore, to determine whether sec8-m4 mutants show a reduced pollen tube growth rate in vivo, a top-to-bottom comparison was performed on 14 siliques harvested from heterozygous outcrosses. In this population, a significantly higher proportion of mutant heterozygotes arose from seeds in the top half of the siliques (22.9%, n = 306), compared to the bottom half (13.8%, n = 283; 2 = 8.064, P  0.01). These results support the hypothesis that the competitive disadvantage of sec8-m4 mutants is due, at least in part, to a slower pollen tube growth rate than wild type. SEC8 function is thereby implicated in pollen tube growth in addition to pollen germination.
In the course of this study, we observed that plants homozygous for the sec8-m4 allele appeared identical to their wild-type siblings with respect to such gross morphological characteristics as leaf shape and size, appearance of inflorescences, trichome structure, and root hair shape and development. The appearance of root hairs was of particular interest because, like pollen tubes, they demonstrate tip growth, and because another exocyst component, SEC3, is associated with a mutant root hair phenotype in maize (Wen et al., 2005
The polarized growth associated with the germination of the pollen tube from a specific site on the pollen grain and the subsequent tip growth of the pollen tube involve the rapid and localized exocytosis of secretory vesicles. In a wide range of eukaryotes, a protein complex known as the exocyst has been shown to facilitate such localized exocytosis (for review, see Hsu et al., 2004 ). The Arabidopsis SEC8 is hypothesized, on the basis of sequence homology, to be a component of the putative plant exocyst (Jurgens and Geldner, 2002; Elias et al., 2003). We have shown that the SEC8 gene is required for pollen germination and competitive pollen tube growth. The most severe mutant alleles of SEC8 hinder germination of the pollen grain, resulting in an absolute male-specific transmission defect. Less severe mutant alleles of SEC8 lead to a decline in the ability of mutant gametophytes to compete with wild-type gametophytes. This decreased competitiveness is at least in part due to a reduced pollen tube growth rate and results in a partial male-specific transmission defect. These results, along with those of Wen et al. (2005), provide the first demonstrated functional role for a putative exocyst component in plants.
Male-specific transmission defects can result from developmental abnormalities that occur at any of a number of stages during microsporogenesis or gametogenesis (Grini et al., 1999
In contrast to the apparent wild-type development of the pollen grain in the mutant, in vivo assays and a complementation experiment definitively demonstrated that the transmission defect in sec8-m3 gametophytes is due to a defect in pollen germination. Mutations associated with germination defects can be assigned to two broad categories: those that affect the reception of stigma-originating signals initiating germination and those that affect the response to these signals, i.e. the generation of polar growth. Germination signals are likely to involve adhesion and hydration, mediated by molecules in the pollen coat and its interaction with the stigma (for review, see Edlund et al., 2004
To explore this question, we utilized TEM to evaluate the ultrastructure of pollen grains from a sec8-m3 heterozygote after placement on a stigma. In wild-type grains, polarized accumulation of vesicles can be seen in the grain within 10 min after pollination (Kandasamy et al., 1994
Further insight into the role of SEC8 in the male gametophyte was gained from an evaluation of the three alleles demonstrating a partial transmission defect, sec8-m4, -m5, and -m6. We hypothesized that this transmission defect was due to a competitive disadvantage for the mutant gametophyte compared to wild type, similar to previously isolated mutations in Arabidopsis (seth8, seth9, and seth10; Lalanne et al., 2004b The competitive disadvantage of the SEC8 partial mutants could arise from defects in pollen germination, pollen tube growth, or pollen tube guidance from the stigma to the ovule. However, we found that sec8-m4 pollen was able to germinate at the same frequency as that of wild-type siblings when evaluated at 2 (aniline blue staining) or 4 h (Alexander staining) after pollination. The data did not rule out the possibility that the mutant pollen has a delayed germination of 2 h or less, but they did point us toward later stages of gametophytic development. The role of SEC8 in postgermination pollen tube growth was explored by monitoring the growth rates of individual pollen tubes over several hours. We discovered that the growth rate of sec8-m4 pollen tubes (1.4 µm min–1) is significantly less than that of wild-type pollen tubes (2.0 µm min–1). The slightly reduced growth rate of the mutant pollen tubes does not prevent a self-crossed sec8-m4 homozygote from producing full-length siliques filled with viable seed, but apparently becomes a detriment when the mutant pollen must compete with wild-type pollen. In an outcross using pollen from a heterozygote, this growth rate competition results in a nonuniform distribution of seeds with the mutant allele in the resultant silique, i.e. the mutant allele is less prevalent at the end of the silique farthest from the stigma. These results clearly demonstrate that SEC8 plays a role not only in pollen germination, but also in the subsequent growth of the pollen tube in vivo.
We were interested in calculating whether the growth rate defect was sufficient to explain the severity of the sec8-m4 transmission disadvantage. In a typical outcross, we observed that approximately 300 pollen grains are applied to the stigma. Those with the fastest growing pollen tubes can be hypothesized to result in fertilization and the formation of the typical 45 seeds in a silique. The growth rate distributions (Fig. 7) predict that the 45 fastest pollen tubes in a heterozygote outcross will be composed of approximately 18% mutant gametophytes. This proportion is the same as the observed outcross results for the sec8-m4 allele (i.e. 18% of the outcross progeny were heterozygotes), suggesting that the growth rate defect is sufficient to account for the partial transmission defect. Caution must be taken, however, as in vitro measurements of pollen tube growth rates are notoriously much lower than those measured in vivo (4–16 µm min–1; Kandasamy et al., 1994
The existence of six different alleles of SEC8 has potential for illuminating particular functional domains of the SEC8 protein. The three alleles with inserts closest to the 5'-end of the gene demonstrate an absolute transmission defect, while those closest to the 3'-end of the gene result in only a partial transmission defect. Two-hundred-fifty amino acid residues span the region at the carboxyl end of the protein that is predicted to be affected by the -m3, -m4, -m5, and -m6 mutations. Available EST sequence data show that this region of the protein is well conserved in homologs across a broad range of plant species, which include angiosperms (both monocots and dicots), gymnosperms, and a moss, attesting to its potential significance. In addition, the partial male transmission defects associated with all three of the C-terminal mutant alleles suggests functional importance for the C terminus of AtSEC8. Intriguingly, mammalian homologs of SEC8 contain at their carboxyl termini a PDZ-binding motif (the amino acids TTV) that is essential for the exocyst complex to direct PDZ-containing proteins to the correct membrane locations (Riefler et al., 2003
This report, along with the report of Wen et al. (2005) , provides functional data to test the hypothesis that the exocyst is involved in tip growth in plants. Orthologs of two different exocyst components in two widely divergent plant species, SEC8 in Arabidopsis (this report) and SEC3 in maize (Wen et al., 2005), have been shown to be important for the proper development of the polarly growing pollen tube and root hair, respectively. These observations provide strong circumstantial evidence that a function for the exocyst in polarized exocytosis is conserved across plant, fungal, and mammalian species. In addition, preliminary evidence suggests that other exocyst subunits are active in pollen tube growth as a part of a high Mr complex (L. Synek, M. Quentin, and V. Zarsky, unpublished data). Due to our inability to obtain a homozygous plant carrying a strong SEC8 mutation, we were unable to assess whether SEC8 is important for root hair growth. The lack of an obvious pollen-associated phenotype in the maize rth1 mutant can be explained by the relatively low expression level for rth1 in pollen and the possible presence of genetic redundancy for SEC3 in the maize genome. Regardless, our hypothesis would predict that mutations in additional plant exocyst genes would also affect root hair and/or pollen tube development. Intriguingly, one other class of protein shown to be important for the polarized growth of both root hair and pollen tube is the Rop GTPase, a key regulator of plant cell polarity (for review, see Yang, 2002). Indeed, the exocyst has been mentioned as a possible target for Rop regulation (Fu and Yang, 2001) and, in mammalian and yeast cells, has been shown to be regulated by a number of related GTPases (for review, see Novick and Guo, 2002). As new mutants and molecular tools (e.g. antibodies) become available, additional genetic, cellular, and molecular experiments should be pursued to verify the existence of a plant exocyst complex, determine its localization in both gametophytic and sporophytic cells, and explore its regulation and functional role in plant cell morphological development.
Sequence and Expression Database Analysis
Plant sequences orthologous to AtSEC8 were identified by Web-based BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997
Expression data for haploid male gametophyte development was extracted from the work of Honys and Twell (2004)
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) lines with T-DNA insertions in the SEC8 gene in a Columbia-0 background were obtained from the SALK Institute: SEC8-m1 (SALK 057409), SEC8-m2 (SALK 016128), SEC8-m3 (SALK 026204), SEC8-m4 (SALK 118129), SEC8-m5 (SALK 039659), and SEC8-m6 (SALK 091118). SEC8-specific primers were used with either left- or right-border T-DNA primers to obtain PCR products on both sides of each insertion, which were sequenced to confirm the insertion site. Seeds were sterilized (1 min in 95% ethanol, 10 min in 20% bleach, and five rinses in sterile water) and cold treated in water for 5 d prior to planting on growth medium (Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 0.0001% [w/v] nicotinic acid, 0.0001% [w/v] thiamine-HCl, 0.0001% [w/v] pyroxidine-HCl, 0.01% [w/v] myoinositol, 0.0004% [w/v] Gly) or potting soil (SB40; Sun Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, WA). Plants were grown in a growth chamber at 24°C, 16 h light per day. Plants used for root hair assessment were grown on growth medium in petri dishes, oriented vertically, and the three longest root hairs of each seedling were measured. To determine plant genotypes, leaf DNA was extracted using a rapid prep method (http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/77/57vejlupkova.html). PCR genotyping was performed using three primers: a primer to the left border of the T-DNA insert (LBb1) and a pair of primers designed to amplify the section of DNA containing the insert site. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table II. Outcrosses were performed by applying pollen from newly dehiscing flowers onto the stigmas of flowers that had been surgically emasculated just prior to dehiscence. Columbia-0 was used as a wild-type tester in outcrosses. Silique evaluations were performed by harvesting mature intact siliques, teasing them open without disturbing the seeds, and examining them under a dissecting microscope.
For complementation, a construct was created by inserting the coding sequence from a full-length cDNA for SEC8 (accession no. AY059763, clone RAFL07-11-G22; Yamada et al., 2003
Root and immature leaf samples from 10-d-old seedlings and mature leaf and immature floral tissue samples from 21-d-old plants were harvested. Pollen was harvested from about 300 Columbia-0 plants by collecting flowers into 300 mL ice-cold 0.3 M mannitol, vigorously shaking for 1 min, filtering through a 75-mm nylon mesh, and concentrating by centrifugation (adapted from Honys and Twell, 2003
Hand-pollinated stigmas were excised from Columbia-0 plants 1 to 4 h after pollination, allowing germination of most wild-type pollen grains, while increasing the probability that the ungerminated pollen grains from the sec8-m3 heterozygote contained the mutant allele. For the quantitative analysis (Table II), all samples were prepared from stigmas at 2 h after pollination. The excised samples were embedded in 2% low-melting-point agarose and immediately fixed and prepared for ultrathin sectioning as described by Park and Twell (2001)
Premature male gametophytes were visualized by surgically removing immature anthers from early stages of flower development and applying aniline blue (0.1% [w/v] prepared in 0.1 M phosphate buffer [pH 8.5]; adapted from Li et al., 1999
Both in vivo pollen germination studies and in vitro pollen tube growth rate assessments were performed by a researcher blind to the pollen source. In vivo pollen germination was assessed as described (Lalanne et al., 2004a In the growth rate experiments, a moderate quantity of pollen was applied to a stigma, which was then immediately excised, placed on a microscope slide that had been coated with germination media [18% (w/v) Suc, 0.01% (w/v) boric acid, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM Ca(NO3)2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.5% (w/v) Noble agar; DIFCO Laboratories, Detroit], and incubated in a moist chamber. Beginning 1 h after pollination, the slides were photographed microscopically at 15- to 30-min intervals over a period of several hours. The measured lengths of individual pollen tubes as they grew onto the surface of the medium allowed the calculation of pollen tube growth rates over this series of intervals. The maximal growth rate for each pollen tube over this period was used in the comparative analysis. Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject to the requisite permission from any third-party owners of all or parts of the material.
We thank M. Foss and Z. Vejlupkova for useful critiques of the manuscript, K. Carroll for consultations on procedures, M. Johnson for advice regarding competition experiments, Z. Yang for the LAT52 construct, and P. Schnable for communicating results prior to publication. We would like to acknowledge M. Nesson and the OSU Electron Microscopy Facility for assistance with the TEM, the OSU CGRB Central Services Lab for sequencing, and the T. Wolpert Lab for assistance with the growth and transformation of Arabidopsis. Finally, we also thank J. McElravy, J. Hines, P. Staiger, and M. Frederick for their cheerful contributions to the work of the laboratory. Received March 4, 2005; returned for revision May 11, 2005; accepted May 17, 2005.
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. IBN–0111078 and IBN–0420226 to J.E.F.), and by Grantová Agentura AV (Czech Republic grant no. A6038410 and EU–HPRN–CT–2002–002656 TIPNET to V.Z.). 
[w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.062273. * Corresponding author; e-mail fowlerj{at}science.oregonstate.edu; fax 541–737–3573.
Alexander M (1969) Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol 44: 117–122[ISI][Medline]
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402
Arthur KM, Vejlupkova Z, Meeley RB, Fowler JE (2003) Maize ROP2 GTPase provides a competitive advantage to the male gametophyte. Genetics 165: 2137–2151 |
TOP
ABSTRACT
RESULTS
