|
|
||||||||
|
First published online July 29, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.063917 Plant Physiology 138:2323-2336 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Maize Endosperm and Their Potential Role in Endoreduplication1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 (C.M.C., R.A.D., P.A.S., Y.S., B.P.D., B.A.L.); and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Johnston, Iowa 501311004 (W.J.G.-K.)
Two maize (Zea mays) cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2, were characterized and shown to be expressed in developing endosperm. Similar to the CDK inhibitors in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), the maize proteins contain a carboxy-terminal region related to the inhibitory domain of the mammalian Cip/Kip inhibitors. Zeama;KRP;1 is present in the endosperm between 7 and 21 d after pollination, a period that encompasses the onset of endoreduplication, while the Zeama;KRP;2 protein declines during this time. Nevertheless, Zeama;KRP;1 accounts for only part of the CDK inhibitory activity that peaks coincident with the endoreduplication phase of endosperm development. In vitro assays showed that Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 are able to inhibit endosperm Cdc2-related CKD activity that associates with p13Suc1. They were also shown to specifically inhibit cyclin A1;3- and cyclin D5;1-associated CDK activities, but not cyclin B1;3/CDK. Overexpression of Zeama;KRP;1 in maize embryonic calli that ectopically expressed the wheat dwarf virus RepA protein, which counteracts retinoblastoma-related protein function, led to an additional round of DNA replication without nuclear division.
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, or CKIs as they are known in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mammals, regulate cell cycle progression by binding to and inhibiting the activity of S- and M-phase CDKs (Morgan, 1997
Recently, CKI gene sequences similar to members of the mammalian Cip/Kip family of CKIs were identified in plants. Seven genes that encode proteins with some degree of sequence homology with p27Kip1, so-called Kip-related proteins (KRPs), were isolated from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Wang et al., 1998
In addition to their role in blocking cell cycle progression, CKIs also appear to help regulate endoreduplication. This type of cell cycle occurs in many eukaryotes, including plants, and it can lead to a dramatic increase in nuclear DNA content. Although the endoreduplication cell cycle is common in metabolically active tissues, the regulatory mechanisms and the components that enable endoreduplicating cells to replicate their DNA without cell division are not entirely clear (Edgar and Orr-Weaver, 2001
Several recent studies in plants reported that KRPs inhibit endoreduplication. Jasinski et al. (2002)
In contrast, studies in a variety of organisms demonstrated a potential positive role for CKIs in the endoreduplication process. Kikuchi et al. (1997)
CDK inhibitory activity in developing maize (Zea mays) endosperm was suggested to be involved in endoreduplication (Grafi and Larkins, 1995
Identification of Two Maize cDNAs Encoding KRPs
Two cDNA clones with the conserved domains found in mammalian Cip/Kip CKIs were found by searching Pioneer Hi-Bred's maize expressed sequence tag database. These clones, called Zeama;KRP;1 (AY986792) and Zeama;KRP;2 (AY986793), have coding regions that are 567 and 771 bp in length, respectively. Comparison of the amino acid sequences deduced from these clones and those of mammalian CKIs showed the C terminus of the maize proteins shares 40% identity with the mammalian p27 Cip/Kip inhibitors (Fig. 1A). This region was identified as the CDK interaction/inhibition domain of the Cip/Kip inhibitors (Russo et al., 1996
Characterization of Maize KRP Gene Expression during Endosperm Development To determine the expression pattern of the genes encoding Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 in maize endosperm, RNA transcripts were detected by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and the corresponding proteins were identified by immunoblotting. Figure 2 shows the accumulation of RNAs encoded by Zeama;KRP;1 (Fig. 2A) and Zeama;KRP;2 (Fig. 2B) between 7 and 21 d after pollination (DAP). These data showed that, relative to the Actin1 control (Fig. 2C), transcripts for both genes were present at what appeared to be relatively constant amounts (note that there is a slight variation in Zeama;KRP;2 at 19 DAP) throughout this period of endosperm development.
Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 protein accumulation was determined with affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies made against glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. Zeama;KRP;1 antibodies detected a protein of approximately 21 kD in 7- to 21-DAP endosperm extracts (Fig. 3A), which is consistent with the predicted molecular mass of Zeama;KRP;1. Zeama;KRP;2 antibodies detected a protein of approximately 26 kD (Fig. 3B), which was also expected based on the molecular mass calculation. However, these antibodies also detected a protein of approximately 20 kD. The 20-kD band most likely corresponds to Zeama;KRP;1, since Zeama;KRP;2 antibodies cross-reacted with the recombinant GST-Zeama;KRP;1 protein in immunoblots (data not shown). Alternatively, this band could represent an unknown protein. The immunoblot analysis showed that, relative to actin protein, Zeama;KRP;1 was present between 7 and 21 DAP, while the Zeama;KRP;2 protein level decreased after 13 DAP (compare Fig. 3, A and B). These results show that, while the pattern of RNA transcript accumulation is similar for the two genes during this period of endosperm development, the Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 proteins are differentially expressed.
Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 Inhibit Maize Endosperm Cdc2-Related Kinases in Vitro
To investigate whether or not Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 have CDK inhibitory activity, their effect on CDKs obtained from maize endosperm was tested by in vitro assays. Figure 4 shows histone H1 phosphorylation by p13Suc1-associated CDK/Cdc2 kinase activities obtained from 9-DAP maize endosperm extracts. Aliquots of the CDKs were incubated with different amounts of GST or GST-tagged Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2. The addition of 0.1 to 1.0 µg of GST-Zeama;KRP;1 (Fig. 4A) or GST-Zeama;KRP;2 (Fig. 4B) inhibited the p13Suc1-bound CDK activity, while increasing amounts of GST alone had no effect. The degree to which CDK activity was reduced in these assays appeared to be proportional to the CKI concentration, as would be expected for this type of CKI (Wang et al., 1998
Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 Specifically Inhibit Cyclin D5;1/CDK and Cyclin A1;3/CDK Activity But Not Cyclin B1;3/CDK Activity in Vitro Although Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 inhibited p13Suc1-associated kinase activities from maize endosperm, the identity of the target CDK complexes was unknown. To determine whether the CKIs inhibited specific cell cycle-related cyclin/CDK complexes, affinity-purified antibodies that recognize cyclin A1;3 (presumably G2/M-phase), cyclin B1;3 (presumably M-phase), and cyclin D5;1 (presumably G1 to S-phase) were used to immunoprecipitate the corresponding CDKs from 9-DAP endosperm extracts. Cyclin D5;1/CDK was obtained from 9-DAP endosperms and also from developing young ears because relatively low levels of cyclin D5;1-associated kinase activity could be obtained from 9-DAP endosperm extracts. Cyclin A1;3-containing CDKs from 9-DAP endosperm effectively phosphorylated histone H1 (Fig. 5A, GST control); in these reactions, the radioactive labeling of histone H1 was approximately 40 times over the control reaction that contained no cyclin A immunoprecipitate (Fig. 5A, lane A). The addition of 0.1 to 5.0 µg of GST-Zeama;KRP;1 to this reaction reduced the kinase activity up to 10-fold.
Immunoprecipitates of cyclin B1;3-containing CDKs from 9-DAP endosperm contained less than one-half the level of histone H1 kinase activity as those recovered with cyclin A1;3 antibodies (compare with GST; Fig. 5, A and B). This could reflect a difference in the level of specific CDKs, cell cycle activity, or a variety of other factors. Endosperm is mitotically active at 9 DAP, although endoreduplication has begun by this stage and one might expect an increase in S-phase-associated CDKs and a reduction in M-phase CDK activity (Grafi and Larkins, 1995 Compared with immunoprecipitates of cyclin A- and cyclin B1;3-containing CDKs, the kinase activity obtained from 9-DAP endosperm extracts with cyclin D5;1 antibodies was low. Because the level of histone H1 phosphorylation was only slightly higher than background (compare Fig. 6A with Fig. 5, A and B), it was not possible to reliably measure the effect of GST-Zeama;KRP;1 on cyclin D5;1-containing CDKs immunoprecipitated from endosperm. We therefore tested the cyclin D5;1-associated CDKs in extracts from small, unfertilized ears. We generally found high levels of activity for all three cyclin/CDK complexes in this tissue (data not shown). As shown in Figure 6B, the cyclin D5;1-associated kinase activity from young ears phosphorylated histone H1 approximately 4 times over the control reaction lacking cyclin D5;1 immunoprecipitate. The addition of 0.5 or 5.0 µg of GST-Zeama;KRP;1 to this reaction reduced histone H1 phosphorylation approximately 80%, but the relative inhibition at either concentration was not measurably different.
The effect of GST-Zeama;KRP;2 on cyclin A1;3/CDK, cyclin D5;1/CDK, and cyclin B1;3/CDK activities was similar to that of GST-Zeama;KRP;1. Cyclin A-containing immunoprecipitates from 9-DAP endosperm extracts had a marked sensitivity to increasing concentrations of Zeama;KRP;2 in the kinase assay (Fig. 7A). On the other hand, kinase assays containing cyclin B1;3/CDKs were essentially unaffected by the addition of GST-Zeama;KRP;2 (Fig. 7B). Immunoprecipitated cyclin D5;1/CDKs from young ear extracts were equally sensitive to either 0.5 or 5 µg of GST-Zeama;KRP;2, and, at either concentration, the level of kinase activity was reduced to about one-half the GST control (Fig. 7C).
Zeama;KRP;1 Does Not Account for All the CDK Inhibitory Activity in Endosperm Cells Undergoing Endoreduplication
Grafi and Larkins (1995)
Because the nature of the CKI is unknown, we decided to test for the presence of Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 in column fractions using specific antibodies. Figure 9, A and B, shows the distribution of CDK inhibitory activity in peak fractions of the Sephadex G100 column, as assayed by human cyclin B/cdc2 kinase. For each fraction, the percent reduction in 32P-labeling of histone H1 was calculated by comparison to a control reaction that contained buffer only (Fig. 9, lane c); the relative inhibition of cyclin B/cdc2 kinase activity is illustrated by the histogram in Figure 9B. To detect Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 in these fractions, the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and reacted with affinity-purified antibodies by immunoblotting. Zeama;KRP;2 was not detectable (data not shown), but Zeama;KRP;1 was found in some of the fractions containing CDK inhibitory activity (Fig. 9C, lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8). Because Zeama;KRP;1 was found in fractions excluded from the Sephadex G100 matrix, it appeared to be associated with high-molecular-weight protein complexes.
Since the CDK inhibitory activity identified in this assay was purified using human recombinant cyclin B/cdc2 as the kinase, we were interested in knowing whether it also affected cyclin A1;3-, cyclin B1;3-, and cyclin D5;1-containing CDKs from maize endosperm. To reduce the contribution of Zeama;KRP;1 to the results of this assay, three column fractions that were immunoblot negative for Zeama;KRP;1 were used for this analysis. Figure 10A shows the sensitivity of endosperm cyclin A1;3-containing CDKs to the partially purified inhibitor. Compared to the level of histone H1 phosphorylation in control reactions containing either the immunoprecipitated cyclin A1;3/CDK or a column fraction lacking CDK inhibitory activity (Fig. 10A, compare lanes c and 4), addition of the three fractions containing the partially purified CKI reduced kinase activity by one-half (Fig. 10A, lanes 13). Similar assays with cyclin B1;3 immunoprecipitate contained a lower level of kinase activity (Fig. 10B, lanes c and 4), but there was no detectable effect of the CKI on histone H1 phosphorylation in these reactions (Fig. 10B, lanes 13). In contrast, the inhibitor activity in these fractions reduced kinase activity associated with cyclin D5;1 immunoprecipitates by one-half, similar to the results with cyclin A1;3-containing CDKs (compare Fig. 10, A and C). These data suggested that, in addition to Zeama;KRP;1, the CDK inhibitory activity contained other types of CKIs.
To examine the contribution of Zeama;KRP;1 to the total CKI activity, we assayed kinase activity before and after immunodepletion of Zeama;KRP;1 from the column fractions. Affinity-purified antibodies recognizing Zeama;KRP;1 were added to aliquots of the samples used in Figure 9, and the protein was removed by reaction with protein A-bound agarose beads. Figure 11 shows the relative inhibition of human cyclin B/cdc2 kinase activity after adding aliquots of the Sephadex G100 column fractions before (Fig. 11A) and after (Fig. 11B) immunoprecipitation of Zeama;KRP;1. To ensure that Zeama;KRP;1 was completely removed, aliquots of immunodepleted fractions were immunoblotted with Zeama;KRP;1 antibodies and shown not to contain detectable levels of this protein (data not shown). Figure 11C shows a comparison of the level of histone H1 phosphorylation by human cyclin B/cdc2 kinase before (gray bar) and after (white bar) removal of Zeama;KRP;1. The fractions illustrated in Figure 11C correspond to the kinase assays shown in Figure 11, A and B. Although there was evidence of increased histone H1 phosphorylation in several samples (e.g. Fig. 11C, fractions 15), kinase activity was relatively unaffected in others (Fig. 11C, fractions 610). Notably, the immunodepletion of Zeama;KRP;1 had relatively little effect on the CKI activity.
Ectopic Expression of Zeama;KRP;1 Can Induce Endoreduplication in Maize Calli
Overexpression of the p21 and p27 Cip/Kip CKIs leads to endoreduplication in human Rb-negative cells (Bates et al., 1998 Figure 12 shows the analysis of nuclear ploidy from two transgenic events expressing RepA only (Fig. 12, A and B), and four events expressing both RepA and Zeama;KRP;1 (Fig. 12, CF). Calli overexpressing only Zeama;KRP;1 grew very slowly, and, for reasons that are unclear, no transgenic calli expressing Zeama;KRP;2 were obtained. Consequently, we were unable to obtain nuclei from calli overexpressing only the KRPs to determine the effect on nuclear ploidy. Based on RT-PCR measurements, there were variable levels of Zeama;KRP;1 and RepA transcripts in the calli (Fig. 12G). In general, the level of Zeama;KRP;1 RNA detected exceeded that of RepA RNA, which could have been a consequence of the additional endogenous expression of the Zeama;KRP;1 gene. Calli transformed with only the RepA gene generally contained lower levels of Zeama;KRP;1 RNA than those ectopically expressing Zeama;KRP;1. Only 2C and 4C nuclei were detected in calli transformed with RepA only (Fig. 12, A and B), but some cells in each of the calli overexpressing Zeama;KRP;1 and ectopically expressing RepA underwent an additional cycle of DNA replication without nuclear division, resulting in 8C nuclei. The callus with the highest level of Zeama;KRP;1 expression had the lowest percentage of endoreduplicated nuclei (Fig. 12D). Calli with the highest percentage of endoreduplicated nuclei appeared to contain somewhat higher levels of Zeama;KRP;1 and RepA RNAs compared to calli transformed with RepA only, but there was no clear relationship between the percentage of endoreduplicated nuclei and the level of RepA and Zeama;KRP;1 RNAs. However, the amount of RNA transcripts detected in these assays might not reflect the level of functional proteins in the cells.
Differential Expression of Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 in Developing Maize Endosperm
We report the identification and characterization of two maize CKIs, Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2, which are expressed in developing endosperm tissue. These proteins have a high degree of homology with Arabidopsis and tobacco KRPs (Wang et al., 1998
Crystal structure analysis of the inhibitory domain of the mammalian p27Kip1 bound to cyclin A/CDK2 revealed a mechanism of inhibition where strong interactions between the inhibitor, the cyclin, and the CDK allow deformation of and interference with the CDK active site (Russo et al., 1996
The maize CKIs, Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2, inhibited p13Suc1-bound CDKs from developing maize endosperm (Fig. 4). However, it is now well documented that p13Suc1 has affinity for CDKA;1 (De Veylder et al., 1997
In contrast to animals, plants contain a complex set of A-type cyclins. In Arabidopsis, there are two A1 (CYCA1;1 and CYCA1;2) and four A2 and A3 (CYCA2;1 to CYCA2;4 and CYCA3;1 to CYCA3;4) genes (Chaubet-Gigot, 2000
Neither of the maize KRPs appeared to inhibit cyclin B1;3/CDK activity from maize endosperm (Figs. 5B and 7B). Even at the highest concentration of KRP (5 µg/reaction), there was no apparent reduction in kinase activity in these reactions (compare Fig. 5, A and B). Based on histone H1 phosphorylation, there was less cyclin B1;3-associated CDK activity immunoprecipitated from 9-DAP endosperm than that obtained with cyclin A1;3 antibodies. This may have some developmental significance, but it is also possible that histone H1 is not as good a substrate for cyclin B1;3- compared to cyclin A1;3-containing CDKs. Zeama;CycB1;3 was proposed to be a mitotic cyclin based on its activity in Xenopus oocytes (Sun et al., 1997
Grafi and Larkins (1995)
We attempted to determine the nature of the endosperm CKI by partially purifying it and testing its effect on cyclin-associated CDK activities that function at different phases of the cell cycle. Although a significant degree of enrichment was made possible by chromatographic purification (Fig. 8), inhibitor fractions eluted from the DEAE-SP Sepharose column were found to contain multiple polypeptides, and it was not possible to identify a CKI. The partially purified CKI activity did not inhibit the ZeamaCycB1:3/CDK from 9-DAP endosperm, but it did inhibit cyclin D5;1/CDK and cyclin A1;3/CDK activity (Fig. 10), similar to Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2. However, based on immunodepletion and immunodetection assays, it was shown that Zeama;KRP;2 is not present and Zeama;KRP;1 only accounts for a portion of this CDK inhibitory activity (Fig. 11). It appears, therefore, that the CDK inhibitory activity described by Grafi and Larkins (1995)
Although endoreduplication is a widespread process, its molecular mechanisms are still not fully understood. Based on studies in plants and animals, it appears that a common regulatory mechanism that creates an endoreduplication cell cycle involves the loss of mitotic regulators and oscillation of S-phase CDKs. Recently, several studies have demonstrated a potential role for CKIs in the endoreduplication process of various organisms (Kikuchi et al., 1997
To determine whether Zeama;KRP;1 can affect endoreduplication, we expressed the gene encoding it in maize embryonic calli in the presence and absence of the wheat dwarf virus RepA protein. RepA expression in these cells, as well as in tobacco cell cultures, was shown to stimulate cell cycle activity, apparently by inhibiting RBR function (Gordon-Kamm et al., 2002
Overexpression of Zeama;KRP;1 in maize embryonic calli ectopically expressing RepA allowed an additional round of DNA replication, resulting in 8C nuclei (Fig. 12). This result is consistent with those from similar types of studies in mammalian cell cultures (Bates et al., 1998
Overexpression of CKIs in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants reduced and/or blocked endoreduplication. Therefore, it is possible that a constitutive high level of CKI is not sufficient to induce endoreduplication. Rather, a preexisting block of the Rb pathway at the transition from the mitotic to the endoreduplication cell cycle could be required to initiate this process. As reported by Hattori et al. (2000)
Isolation of Maize CKI cDNA Clones By searching Pioneer Hi-Bred's maize (Zea mays) expressed sequence tag database, two putative maize cDNA clones were identified based on conserved domains of the mammalian Cip/Kip family of CKIs. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of the maize clones with those of the mammalian Cip/Kip family of CKIs, and those of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; ICK1/KRP1-7) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; NtKIS1a and NsKIS1), were performed using MACAW software. One of the cDNA clones was arbitrarily identified as Zeama;KRP;1 and the other as Zeama;KRP;2.
Total RNA was isolated from maize tissue using an Absolutely RNA miniprep kit, as recommended by the manufacturer (Stratagene, San Diego). RT-PCR reactions were performed with 50 (B73 endosperm) or 8 ng (maize embryonic calli) of total RNA using the Titan One Tube RT-PCR system (Roche, Basel), as recommended by the manufacturer. RT-PCR reactions with RNA from maize embryonic calli contained [
The Zeama;KRPs were PCR amplified from their respective cDNAs using gene-specific primers (GSTKRP1 forward, 5'-CGGGATCCATGGGCAAGTACATGCGCAAGGCC-3', GSTKRP1 reverse, 5'-CGGAATTCTCAGTCTAGCTTCACCCACTCAAACC-3'; GSTKRP2 forward, 5'-CGGGATCCATGGGGAAGTACATGCGCAAGTGC-3', GSTKRP2 reverse, 5'-GGAATTCTCAGATGCTGACCACCGGCGCCC-3'), subcloned in frame into the pGEx4T-3 expression vector (Amersham) and the resulting construct used to transform BL21 codon plus (DE3)-RIL cells (Stratagene). Recombinant GST-Zeama;KRP;1 and GST-Zeama;KRP;2 protein production was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-
Polyclonal rabbit antisera were raised against the complete Zeama;KRP;1 protein and against amino acids 1 to 120 of the Zeama;KRP;2. Both recombinant proteins were expressed from cDNA clones with a GST tag in Escherichia coli, as described above, separated by 15% SDS-PAGE, and the corresponding bands (according to their calculated molecular weight) were excised and sent to Strategic Biosolutions (Widham, ME) for production of polyclonal antisera. For affinity purification of Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2 antibodies, the crude antisera were centrifuged at 5,000g for 30 min at 4°C in a Sorvall SS-34 rotor; proteins were precipitated with 50% ammonium sulfate by stirring at 4°C overnight and collected by centrifugation at 3,000g for 30 min at 4°C. The protein pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, to the original volume, incubated by rocking for 6 h with GST covalently bound to 1,1'-carbonyldimidazole-activated, 0% cross-linked, beaded agarose (reactive gel 6x; Pierce, Rockford, IL). After 6 h, the supernatant was collected and incubated by rocking at 4°C overnight with GST-Zeama;KRP;1 or GST-Zeama;KRP;2 covalently bound to beaded agarose (reactive gel 6x; Pierce). The agarose beads were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 (50x bed column volume), and the antibodies were eluted with 100 mM Gly, pH 2.4, and collected in microcentrifuge tubes containing 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, which was needed to adjust the pH to approximately 7.0. Fractions that contained antibodies were pooled and concentrated with Amicon Ultra-15, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Millipore, Bedford, MA). For immunodetection of Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2, 9- to 21-DAP dissected B73 endosperms were ground in 3 volumes of NETT buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.5% Triton X-100, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4), with freshly added 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT, and 1x protease inhibitor cocktail, and centrifuged at 12,000g at 4°C for 10 min in an Eppendorf microfuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Fifty micrograms of protein from each sample was separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose using a wet transfer apparatus (mini trans-blot cell; Bio-Rad) at 200 Vh. The membrane was blocked with Tween plus Tris-buffered saline (TTBS; 20 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.005% Tween 20) plus 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h, followed by overnight incubation on a rotating plate at 4°C with a 1:1,000 dilution of polyclonal rabbit anti-Zeama;KRP;1 and a 1:100 dilution of anti-Zeama;KRP;2 antibody. After three washes with TTBS for 15 min each, the membranes were incubated for 1 h with a 1:25,000 dilution of anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma). The membranes were washed with TTBS three times for 15 min each and incubated with chemiluminescent substrate (Super Signal West Pico; Pierce) for 5 min. Then the membranes were exposed to x-ray films, which were subsequently developed (QX 134 plus; Konica, Tokyo). All immunoblot analyses were performed at least two times.
Three to five grams of dissected endosperm from 9-DAP kernels were ground in 10 to 15 mL of NETT buffer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was preincubated with a 30-µL slurry of glutathione agarose beads (Sigma; Grafi and Larkins, 1995 Rabbit polyclonal antibodies that cross-react with maize cyclin A1;3, cyclin B1;3, and cyclin D5;1 were prepared as described by R.A. Dante, P.A. Sabelli, H. Nguyen, J.T. Leiva-Neto, Y. Tao, K.S. Lowe, G. Hoerster, W.J. Gordon-Kamm, R. Jung, and B.A. Larkins (unpublished data). Monospecific antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography with GST fusions of the cyclin proteins. Immunoprecipitation of cyclin A1;3-, cyclin D5;1-, and cyclin B1;3-associated CDK activity was performed similarly to the p13Suc1 pull downs, except that endosperm extracts or extracts from 10- to 15-cm-long immature ears were incubated with approximately 5 µg of affinity-purified cyclin D5;1 antibodies, 0.5 µg of affinity-purified cyclin A1;3 antibodies, or 1.0 µg of affinity-purified cyclin B1;3 antibodies for 2 h on a rocker at 4°C. Subsequently, protein A agarose beads (Sigma) were added and incubated for 2 h by rocking at 4°C. The protein A agarose beads were centrifuged and washed as previously described. As a negative control, endosperm or immature ear extract was incubated with protein A agarose beads only.
For the CDK inhibition assay, the concentration of the recombinant proteins, GST-Zeama;KRP;1 and GST-Zeama;KRP;2, and GST alone was estimated by side-by-side comparison with known concentrations of bovine serum albumin (fraction V; Pierce) after 12.5% SDS-PAGE, scanning the gel, and measuring the bands using Image J software. The kinase activity associated with anti-cyclin A1;3, anti-cyclin D5;1, and anti-cyclin B1;3 immunoprecipitates, or p13Suc1 pulls downs, was incubated with different amounts of GST or recombinant Zeama;KRP proteins plus kinase buffer, 100 µL total volume, by rocking for 1.5 h at 4°C. The p13Suc1-conjugated agarose beads or protein A agarose beads were collected by centrifugation, washed with kinase buffer one time, and incubated with 7 µL of kinase buffer, 1 µL of 2.5 µg/µL histone H1 (Sigma), 1 µL of 4 mM ATP, and 1 µL of [
One hundred grams of 15-DAP maize kernels were homogenized in 200 mL of NETT buffer and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C in a Sorvall GS-A rotor. The supernatant was filtered through one layer of Miracloth, and the proteins recovered by precipitation with 30% to 80% ammonium sulfate. The pellet was resuspended in 20 mL NETT buffer, applied to a 2.5- x 100-cm Sephadex G100 column, and 8-mL samples collected. Fractions with CDK inhibitory activity were pooled and applied to linked DEAE-SP Sepharose columns (each 2 x 15 cm). The columns were washed with 1 M NaCl and then equilibrated with 7x bed column volume of NETT buffer. The SP Sepharose column was eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 1.0 M NaCl and fractions containing CDK inhibitory activity were analyzed.
For the CKI assay, 1 µL of 5 units/µL human recombinant cyclin B/cdc2 (Promega, Madison, WI), or the kinase activity associated with the previously described maize cyclin immunoprecipitates, and 2 µL of alternate fractions collected from the Sephadex G100 column were incubated with 20 µL of kinase buffer at room temperature for 10 min. When the assay was performed with the purified CDK inhibitory fraction from developing endosperm, 2 µL of fractions collected from the SP Sepharose column were used. Fractions from the Sephadex G-100 column were used in most assays because too little activity was recovered after affinity chromatography on DEAE-SP Sepharose. The kinase reaction was initiated by adding 1 µL of 2.5 µg/µL histone H1 (Sigma), 0.5 µL of 25 mM ATP, and 0.5 µL of [ Immunodepletion of Zeama;KRP;1 protein from Sephadex G100 fractions was performed by incubating alternate 1-mL fractions with approximately 5 µg of polyclonal Zeama;KRP;1 antibodies for 2 h on a rocker at 4°C. Subsequently, protein A agarose beads (Sigma) were added and incubated for 2 h by rocking at 4°C. The protein A agarose beads were centrifuged, the supernatant transferred to a clean microfuge tube, and an aliquot was immediately used for CKI assays. As a control, 1 mL of the same fraction was incubated with only protein A agarose beads.
Embryogenic maize calli were cobombarded with genes expressing the wheat dwarf virus RepA protein and/or Zeama;KRP;1 and Zeama;KRP;2, as described by Gordon-Kamm et al. (2002)
Maize calli were obtained from high type II embryos, as described by Gordon-Kamm et al. (2002)
Maize embryonic calli transformed with Zeama;KRP;1, GUS, RepA, or RepA + Zeama;KRP;1 were chopped with a single-edged razor blade in the presence of 0.8 mL of filtered ice cold PARTEC (Munster, Germany) buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% Triton X-100; Dilkes et al., 2002 Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank data libraries under accession numbers AY986792 and AY986793. Received April 6, 2005; returned for revision April 28, 2005; accepted April 30, 2005.
1 This work was supported by grants from the Department of Energy (DE96ER20242) and Pioneer Hi-Bred International (to B.A.L.) and by scholarships from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil (to C.M.C. and R.A.D).
2 Present address: Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 462681054. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.063917. * Corresponding author; e-mail larkins{at}ag.arizona.edu; fax 5206213692.
An G, Mitra A, Choi HK, Costa MA, An K, Thornburg RW, Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3' control region of the potato wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene. Plant Cell 1: 115122 Bates S, Ryan KM, Phillips AC, Vousden KH (1998) Cell cycle arrest and DNA endoreduplication following p21waf1/cip1 expression. Oncogene 17: 16911703[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Chang B, Broude EV, Fang J, Kalinichenko TV, Abdryashitov R, Poole JC, Roninson IB (2000) p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1-induced growth arrest is associated with depletion of mitosis-control proteins and leads to abnormal mitosis and endoreduplication in recovering cells. Oncogene 19: 21652170[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Chaubet-Gigot N (2000) Plant A-type cyclins. Plant Mol Biol 43: 659675[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
De Veylder L, Beeckman T, Beemster GT, Krols L, Terras F, Landrieu I, van der Schueren E, Maes S, Naudts M, Inze D (2001) Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 16531668 De Veylder L, Sergers G, Glad N, Casteels P, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1997) The Arabidopsis Ckst1At protein binds the cyclin-dependent kinases cdc2aAt and cdc2bAt. FEBS Lett 412: 446452[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Dewitte W, Murray JA (2003) The plant cell cycle. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 235264[CrossRef][Medline]
Dilkes BP, Dante RA, Coelho C, Larkins BA (2002) Genetic analyses of endoreduplication in Zea mays endosperm: evidence of sporophytic and zygotic maternal control. Genetics 160: 11631177 Edgar B, Orr-Weaver TL (2001) Endoreduplication cell cycles: more for less. Cell 105: 297306[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fountain MD, Renz A, Beck E (1999) Isolation of a cDNA encoding a G1-cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (ICDK) from suspension cultured photoautotrophic Chenopidium rubrum L. cells. Plant Physiol 120: 339
Gordon-Kamm W, Dilkes BP, Lowe K, Hoerster G, Sun X, Ross M, Church L, Bunde C, Farrell J, Hill P, et al (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plant retinoblastoma pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1197511980
Grafi G, Burnett RJ, Helentjaris T, Larkins BA, DeCaprio JA, Sellers WR, Kaelin WG (1996) A maize cDNA encoding a member of the retinoblastoma protein family: involvement in endoreduplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 89628967
Grafi G, Larkins BA (1995) Endoreduplication in maize endosperm- involvement of M-phase promoting factor inhibition and induction of S-phase-related kinases. Science 269: 12621264 Gutierrez C (2000) DNA replication and cell cycle in plants: learning from geminiviruses. EMBO J 19: 792799[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gutierrez C, Ramirez-Parra E, Castellano MM, Del Pozo JC (2002) G1 to S transition: more than a cell cycle engine switch. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 480486[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hattori N, Davies TC, Anson-Cartwright L, Cross JC (2000) Periodic expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p57kip2 in trophoblast giant cells defines a G2-like gap phase of the endocycle. Mol Biol Cell 11: 10371045
Jasinski S, Riou-Khamlichi C, Roche O, Perennes C, Bergounioux C, Glab N (2002) The CDK inhibitor NtKIS1a is involved in plant development, endoreduplication and restores normal development of cyclin D3;1-overexpressing plants. J Cell Sci 115: 973982
Kikuchi J, Furukawa Y, Iwase S, Terui Y, Nakamura M, Kitagawa S, Kitagawa M, Komatsu N, Miura Y (1997) Polyploidization and functional maturation are two distinct processes during megakaryocytic differentiation: involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 in polyploidization. Blood 89: 39803990 Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage-T4. Nature 227: 680685[CrossRef][Medline]
Leiva-Neto JT, Grafi G, Sabelli PA, Dante RA, Woo YM, Maddock S, Gordon-Kamm W, Larkins BA (2004) A dominant negative mutant of cyclin-dependent kinase A reduces endoreduplication but not cell size or gene expression in maize endosperm. Plant Cell 16: 18541869 Lui H, Wang H, DeLong C, Fowke LC, Crosby WL, Fobert PR (2000) The Arabidopsis Cdc2a-interacting protein ICK2 is structurally related to ICK1 and is a potent inhibitor of cyclin dependent kinase activity in vitro. Plant J 21: 379385[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mironov V, De Veylder L, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1999) Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plantsthe nexus. Plant Cell 11: 509521 Morgan DO (1997) Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks and microprocessors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13: 261291[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Nakayama K, Nagahama H, Minamishima YA, Matsumoto M, Nakamichi I, Kitagawa K, Shirane M, Tsunematsu R, Tsukiyama T, Ishida N, et al (2000) Targeted disruption of Skp2 results in accumulation of cyclin E and p27Kip1, polyploid and centrosome overduplication. EMBO J 19: 20692081[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Niculescu AB, Chen X, Smeets M, Hengs L, Prives C, Reed SI (1998) Effects of p21 (Cip/Waf) at both G1/S and G2/M cell cycle transitions: pRb is a critical determinant in blocking DNA replication and in preventing endoreduplication. Mol Cell Biol 18: 629643
Reichheld JP, Chaubet N, Shen WH, Renaudin JP, Gigot C (1996) Multiple A-type cyclins express sequentially during the cell cycle in Nicotiana tabacum BY2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1381913824 Roudier F, Fedorova E, Györgyey J, Feher A, Brown S, Kondorosi A, Kondorosi E (2000) Cell cycle function of a Medicago sativa A2-type cyclin interacting with a PSTAIRE-type cyclin-dependent kinase and a retinoblastoma protein. Plant J 23: 7383[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Russo AA, Jeffrey PD, Patten AK, Massangué J, Pavletich NP (1996) Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor bound to the cyclinA-Cdk2 complex. Nature 382: 325331[CrossRef][Medline]
Schnittger A, Weinl C, Bouyer D, Schobinger U, Hulskamp M (2003) Misexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1/KRP1 in single-celled Arabidopsis trichomes reduces endoreduplication and cell size and induces cell death. Plant Cell 15: 303315 Sherr CJ, Roberts JM (1995) Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev 10: 11491163 Songstad DD, Armstrongn CL, Petersen WL, Hairston B, Honchee MAW (1996) Production of transgenic maize plants and progeny by bombardment of Hi II immature embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 32: 170183 Sun Y, Flannigan BA, Madison JT, Setter TL (1997) Alternative splicing of cyclin transcripts in maize endosperm. Gene 195: 167175[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sun Y, Flannigan BA, Setter TL (1999) Regulation of endoreduplication in maize (Zea mays L.) endosperm. Isolation of a novel B1-type cyclin and its quantitative analysis. Plant Mol Biol 41: 245258[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vandepoele K, Raes J, De Veylder L, Rouzé P, Rombautus S, Inzé D (2002) Genome-wide analysis of core cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 903916 Wang H, Qi Q, Schorr P, Cutler AJ, Crosby WL, Fowke L (1998) ICK1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor from Arabidopsis thaliana interacts with both Cdc2a and CycD3, and its expression is induced by abscisic acid. Plant J 15: 501510[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wang H, Zhou Y, Gilmer S, Whitwill S, Fowke LC (2000) Expression of the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 affects cell division, plant growth and morphology. Plant J 24: 613623[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Weinberg RA (1995) The retinoblastoma protein and the cell cycle control. Cell 81: 323330[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Zhou Y, Fowke LC, Wang H (2002a) Plant CDK inhibitors: studies of interactions with cell cycle regulators in the yeast two-hybrid system and functional comparisons in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Rep 20: 967975[CrossRef][Web of Science] Zhou Y, Wang H, Gilmer S, Whitwill S, Keller W, Fowke LC (2002b) Control of petal and pollen development by the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 in transgenic Brassica plants. Planta 215: 248257[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|