|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 28, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.067553 Plant Physiology 139:1495-1506 (2005) © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists HKT1 Mediates Sodium Uniport in Roots. Pitfalls in the Expression of HKT1 in Yeast1Departamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
The function of HKT1 in roots is controversial. We tackled this controversy by studying Na+ uptake in barley (Hordeum vulgare) roots, cloning the HvHKT1 gene, and expressing the HvHKT1 cDNA in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. High-affinity Na+ uptake was not detected in plants growing at high K+ but appeared soon after exposing the plants to a K+-free medium. It was a uniport, insensitive to external K+ at the beginning of K+ starvation and inhibitable by K+ several hours later. The expression of HvHKT1 in yeast was Na+ (or K+) uniport, Na+-K+ symport, or a mix of both, depending on the construct from which the transporter was expressed. The Na+ uniport function was insensitive to external K+ and mimicked the Na+ uptake carried out by the roots at the beginning of K+ starvation. The K+ uniport function only took place in yeast cells that were completely K+ starved and disappeared when internal K+ increased, which makes it unlikely that HvHKT1 mediates K+ uptake in roots. Mutation of the first in-frame AUG codon of HvHKT1 to CUC changed the uniport function into symport. The expression of the symport from either mutants or constructs keeping the first in-frame AUG took place only in K+-starved cells, while the uniport was expressed in all conditions. We discuss here that the symport occurs only in heterologous expression. It is most likely related to the K+ inhibitable Na+ uptake process of roots that heterologous systems fail to reproduce.
Living cells need to accumulate large amounts of K+ for osmotic and charge balance adjustments. Although, from a chemical point of view, Na+ could perform these functions, high Na+ concentrations are toxic for many cellular processes, and Na+ exclusion from the cell is as crucial as K+ uptake in all types of cells that are growing in Na+-rich media (Rodríguez-Navarro, 2000
To understand the relationships of plants with K+ and Na+ and how K+ and Na+ move into and inside the plant, a solid and broad understanding of the function of the K+ and Na+ transporters is required. This understanding has been pursued for a long time, but, recently, interest in the plant K+ and Na+ transporters has increased because of the technological importance of constructing crop plants that are more tolerant to salinity. The use of salty water, which prevails in many agricultural conditions, is an important cause of reductions in crop productivity and a threat to food security (Rhoades et al., 1992
Despite all this technological interest, present knowledge about K+ and Na+ transporters in plants is still fragmentary and confusing. The best example of this situation is the HKT1 transporter of wheat (Triticum aestivum), which was the first K+ transporter that was identified in plants (Schachtman and Schroeder, 1994
This controversy about the function of wheat HKT1 in roots is a challenging situation that needs to be resolved because current science should be able to explain the function of a transporter that was cloned 10 years ago. With the aim of solving the controversy, we have cloned and studied the HKT1 barley (Hordeum vulgare) homolog. Barley was selected because it has many genetic similarities to wheat (Laurie and Devos, 2002 We report here that yeast expression of the HvHKT1 cDNA can result in either a Na+ (or K+) uniporter or in a Na+-K+ symporter, depending on the constructs used for inserting the HvHKT1 cDNA into the yeast expression vector. The symporter was expressed exclusively in K+-starved cells, while the uniporter was also expressed in cells growing under normal conditions. Because only the uniport function was identified in barley roots, we suspect that the symport function is an artifact of expressing HKT1 in yeast. Mutational analysis suggests that the artifact may be produced by a sequence context or secondary structure of the mRNA that is involved in an alternative initiation of translation in the plant and that the yeast cells do not understand.
High-Affinity Na+ Uptake in the Roots of Barley Seedlings
The roots of K+-starved barley seedlings exhibit high-affinity Na+ uptake that is inhibited by K+ and in no cases stimulated by K+ (Rains and Epstein, 1967a
To investigate whether, at any time, an HKT transporter was mediating K+ uptake, we used two types of experiments. First, we tried to find a condition in which either K+ uptake was enhanced by Na+ or Na+ uptake was enhanced by K+, but failed to find any of those effects at any time during the starvation period. Second, we compared Rb+ uptake with K+ uptake, expecting to find differences if HKT1 was transporting K+ because the K+ transporter HAK1 does not discriminate between K+ and Rb+ (Santa-María et al., 1997
To sum up, our experiments revealed that high-affinity Na+ uptake (tests at 10050 µM) in barley roots was mediated by two transporters or by a single transporter that could be in two different states, insensitive and inhibitable by K+. In addition, they ruled out the presence of an Na+-K+ symporter and suggested that K+ uptake was mediated exclusively by HvHAK1 (Santa-María et al., 1997
By using primers deduced from the wheat HKT1 sequence and standard reverse transcription (RT)-PCR methods, we cloned a cDNA from barley roots, HvHKT1, whose sequence was 78% identical to the wheat HKT1 sequence. This cDNA could encode a protein with an amino acid sequence 92.5% identical to that of the wheat HKT1 transporter, and 67.3% and 69.0% identical to OsHKT1 and OsHKT2, respectively. A Gly residue in the first membrane-pore-membrane (MPM) motif of the wheat HKT1 transporter (the structure of HKT transporters is made up of four MPM motifs, as discussed elsewhere [Durell and Guy, 1999
The sequence similarity between HvHKT1 and wheat HKT1 cDNAs and the absence of other barley clones with high similarity to HvHKT1 (see below) indicated that the expression studies previously published in barley (Wang et al., 1998
The HvHKT1 cDNA was inserted into the yeast expression vector pYPGE15 (Brunelli and Pall, 1993
Many constructs gave rise to the function that was intermediate between the pure uniport and symport functions, but we identified several that expressed almost pure uniport or symport functions. Out of these, we selected two with different polylinker fragments joining the PGK1 promoter and the 5' end of the cDNA (starting 20-bp upstream of the first in-frame ATG triplet) as models for the expression of the two functions. The short-linking fragment (SLF) construct gave rise to an Na+ (or K+) uniport (the effect of adding the two cations together had a small enhancing effect on Na+ uptake), whereas the long-linking fragment (LLF) construct gave rise to an Na+-K+ symport (the rate of uniport activity of this construct was 5 to 10 times lower than the symport activity; Fig. 2). As previously reported for HKT1 (Schachtman and Schroeder, 1994
Rb+ alone was not transported by transformants with either of the two constructs when tested at micromolar concentrations. However, in transformants with both the SLF and LLF constructs, the addition of Na+ triggered Rb+ uptake (Fig. 3). Moreover, with the LLF construct, Rb+ triggered Na+ uptake, and Na+ and Rb+ were taken up exactly at the same rate (Fig. 3). In contrast, with the SLF construct, Na+ was taken up in the absence of other cations (Fig. 2) and Rb+ stimulated, but not triggered, Na+ uptake (compare Figs. 2 and 3). In other words, with the SLF construct, the transporter functioned simultaneously as a Na+ uniporter and a Na+-Rb+ symporter.
Molecular Basis of the Uniport and Symport Functions of HvHKT1
The only possible explanation for the uniport and symport modes of Na+ and K+ uptake that were mediated by the products of the SLF and LLF constructs of HvHKT1 was that the two constructs expressed two transporters that were physically different. A possible explanation for this was a construct-dependent splicing of an unpredicted intron in either of the two constructs. In the PGK1 fragment in plasmid pYPGE15, there is an ATG triplet followed by an in-frame stop codon that is common to the two constructs. No other ATG triplet exists in the SLF construct, but in the LLF construct there are two additional ATG triplets that are not in frame with the HvHKT1 coding region but that could also be used for the initiation of translation after splicing (Fig. 2A). After checking that the reported initiation of transcription of the PGK1 promoter (Rathjen and Mellor, 1990 The next experiments were then carried out to test whether the initiation of translation was different in the SLF and LLF constructs. For this purpose, we mutated the first in-frame ATG triplet of HvHKT1 to CTC (HvHKT1-27), finding that this mutation produced symporters in the two constructs (Fig. 4). This result indicated that the uniport was mediated by a protein whose translation was initiated at the first in-frame AUG, while the symport was mediated by a shorter protein (observe in Fig. 2A that the in-frame stop triplet that is 24 nucleotides [nt] upstream of the first in-frame ATG triplet prevents the synthesis of a protein with an N terminus longer than the sequence recorded in Fig. 4A). The second in-frame ATG triplet in HvHKT1 encoded a Met residue situated at position 63, at the end of the first M fragment of the first MPM motif. Although it was unlikely that a transporter lacking the first M fragment of the first MPM motif was still functional, we deleted the first 186 nt of the open reading frame of HvHKT1 cDNA (HvHKT1-15) and produced two constructs, SLF and LLF, identical to those shown in Figure 2, except that Met-1 in the new constructs corresponded to Met-63 in the original ones. Transformants of the yeast mutant with these two constructs failed to exhibit any type of Na+ or K+ uptake.
These results indicated that the symport function that was produced by the LLF construct was mediated by a protein whose translation was initiated at a non-AUG codon located between the first and second in-frame AUG codons. In an attempt to find out the initiation of translation in this construct, we fused to the 3' end of the HvHKT1 cDNA an in-frame DNA fragment that added a His tail to the protein and cloned the modified cDNA into the SLF and LLF constructs. Both constructs were active, exhibiting ion transport activities identical to those of the original clones (uniport-symport), except for 40% larger Vmax. However, despite these encouraging results, the purification of the proteins proved to be difficult, and we were unable to obtain a reliable amino acid sequence of the protein produced by the LLF construct.
Tackling the problem of the initiation of translation of the protein that functioned as a symport by mutational analyses was difficult because the number of non-AUG codons to test was high (Fig. 4A). However, we selected some in-frame triplets differing only in 1 nt from ATG (the selected triplets encoded the residues Val-4, Leu-16, Leu-39, Ile-46, and Leu-48) and created triplets that differed 2 nt from ATG, expecting that the corresponding codons in the mRNA would not be able to serve for initiation of translation (Drabkin and Rajbhandary, 1998
The wheat HKT1 has been taken as a K+ transporter model (Véry and Sentenac, 2003
The Symport Is Expressed Only in Special Conditions
All the experiments reported so far were carried out in yeast cells that were starved for 4 h in a K+-free medium (K+-starved cells) in order to decrease their K+ content and cellular pH (Ramos et al., 1990 If the symporter was expressed when translation was initiated at a non-AUG codon and this occurred exclusively in K+-starved cells, it could be predicted that mutants HvHKT1-27 and HvHKT1-28, in which the first in-frame AUG had been eliminated, would not exhibit transport in normal cells treated with NaN3, regardless of whether the construct was SLF or LLF. These experiments were carried out and the results confirmed the prediction. In contrast, mutant HvHKT1-19, which expressed symporter functions from the two constructs, presumably initiating translation at the AUG codon generated by mutation, exhibited the symport functions both in K+-starved and NaN3-treated cells (Table I). These results suggested that non-AUG initiation of translation was dependent on the conditions imposed by K+ starvation.
A Second Copy of HvHKT1 Apparently Does Not Exist
High-affinity Na+ uptake in the roots of barley seedlings was found to be K+ insensitive or inhibitable by K+, depending on the conditions of the seedlings (Fig. 1). The expression of HvHKT1 in the yeast mutant from the SLF construct produced a K+-insensitive Na+ uptake (Fig. 2) similar to that found in roots, but under no conditions did HvHKT1 reproduce the K+-inhibitable Na+ uptake in yeast. This posed the question of whether another HvHKT gene, perhaps an almost identical copy of HvHKT1, could encode the transporter that mediated the K+-inhibitable Na+ uptake. In rice, OsHKT2 is an almost exact copy of OsHKT1 that exists in cultivars of the indica subspecies (Horie et al., 2001 From these results, we concluded that HvHKT1 was the only HKT gene that was highly expressed in the roots of K+-starved barley seedlings and that, consequently, both K+-insensitive and K+-inhibitable Na+ influxes were both mediated by a single product or alternative products of the HvHKT1 gene.
Among all possible post-translational modifications that could change the activity of HvHKT1, phosphorylation could easily be tested by mutational analysis and expression in yeast. Replacement of Ser residues by Asp mimics a phosphorylated Ser, while replacement by Leu prevents the phosphorylation. According to the structure proposed for HKT transporters (Durell and Guy, 1999
In the experiments of Na+ and K+ uptake with K+-starved yeast cells transformed with HvHKT1 (Fig. 2), we had observed that the uptake of cations ceased before the cells had reached the normal level of cation content. In fungal cells, cation uptake increases the internal pH due to the exchange of internal H+ for external K+ or Na+ and, consequently, the H+ pump decreases its pumping rate (Blatt and Slayman, 1987
Two HKT1 Functions Are Expressed in Heterologous Systems The study of many constructs revealed that the yeast expression of HvHKT1 exhibited a variable mechanism of transport. In most of them, yeast cells took up Na+ and K+ when added independently and the uptake of each of them was enhanced when the other cation was present. In contrast, the SLF and LLF constructs reported here exhibited almost pure uniport and symport functions, respectively (Fig. 2). This suggested that the same cDNA produced two basic transport functions, uniport and symport, and that intermediate transport functions could be explained by the simultaneous production of the two basic functions in different proportions. The production of many different transporters with functions that are midway between the uniport and symport cannot be formally ruled out, but seems unlikely.
A stoichiometry of 2 K+ to 1 Na+ has been proposed for HKT1, with experimental data of 1.7 to 1 in Xenopus oocytes and 2.1 to 1 in K+-starved yeast cells (Rubio et al., 1995
Apart from the possible physiological reasons that originated a diversity of functions for the product or products of the HvHKT1 mRNA, the finding of a dual function, uniport and symport, is not an outstanding result. HKT transporters bind two alkali cations (Garciadeblás et al., 2003 The variability of the functions obtained with the same cDNA in heterologous expressions (Fig. 2) reveals that several HKT1 proteins are probably produced from the same mRNA. The mutation of the first in-frame ATG triplet of the HvHKT1 and TaHKT1 cDNAs (mutant 27), which necessarily had to abolish the initiation of translation at that codon, did not affect the symport function (LLF constructs) but transformed the uniport function exhibited by the SLF constructs into symport. Two conclusions can be drawn from these and other experiments summarized in Figure 4: (1) The Na+ (or K+) uniport function exhibited by the SLF construct is mediated by a protein whose translation from the HvHKT1 mRNA is initiated at the first in-frame AUG codon; and (2) in the LLF construct, the HvHKT1 mRNA has an internal initiation of translation that produces a shorter protein and the symport function. Because initiation of translation at the second in-frame AUG codon did not produce an active transporter, it seems clear that a non-AUG codon between the first and second in-frame AUG codons provides the initiation for wild-type cDNA in the LLF construct, and that this produces the Na+-K+ symport function. The symport function of mutant HvHKT1-19, which encodes a shorter protein, supports this hypothesis. The finding that a CUG codon was probably used for the initiation of translation in a deletion mutant (Fig. 4B, mutant 28), but that its mutation to CUC in wild-type cDNA did not abolish the symport function of the LLF construct (Fig. 4B, mutant 17) strongly suggests that there are more than one non-AUG codon involved in translation initiation. Due to this problem and the difficulties in purifying the protein, we have not been able to define exactly the HvHKT1 protein that mediates Na+-K+ symport in the SLF construct of HvHKT1 (i.e. the non-AUG codon that initiates translation). Considering the high number of triplets that might be involved, the possibility that the symporter has a heterotetrameric structure and even that different amounts of proteins may give rise to different functions, it seems clear that the problem needs to be tackled using another experimental approach. In any case, the identification of the involved codon in yeast cells is of less relevance from the physiological point of view of the plant and for this article, which aims to determine the function of HKT1 in roots.
Our experiments failed to detect high-affinity Na+ uptake that is activated by K+ in the roots of barley seedlings. These and previous results (Maathuis et al., 1996
High-affinity Na+ uptake in barley roots took place in two forms attending to the effect of K+, either K+ insensitive or inhibitable by low K+ concentrations. The former occurred at the beginning of K+ starvation, when the K+ content of the seedling roots is still normal, and the latter is characteristic of K+-depleted roots, although it appears before the roots show a deep K+ depletion. In previous reports, only the K+-inhibitable process had been detected (Rains and Epstein, 1967a
A more difficult question to answer is whether HvHKT1 also mediates the form of high-affinity Na+ uptake that is strongly inhibited by K+. Our RT-PCR experiments failed to find HKT transcripts other than HvHKT1 that were highly expressed in seedlings under K+ starvation. The most likely hypothesis, therefore, is that HvHKT1 mediates both types of high-affinity Na+ uptake, insensitive and inhibitable by K+, and that barley does not have a second transporter very similar to HvHKT1, as in the case of OsHKT1 and OsHKT2 in rice (Horie et al., 2001 Although our original experiments were carried out with the barley transporter HvHKT1, many experiments were later repeated with the wheat transporter TaHKT1, and all the results indicate that findings for the barley transporter apply to the wheat transporter.
We have proposed above that the uniport function expressed in yeast cells is the physiological function in roots, and this poses the question of whether the symport function is only a fortuitous artifact of heterologous expression or whether it reveals the existence of a physiological process performed by HKT1 transporters in plants that yeast cells and Xenopus oocytes fail to reproduce correctly. If the symport function of HvHKT1 and TaHKT1 in yeast cells is due to alternative initiations of translations of the HKT1 mRNAs, and another explanation for our results is difficult to imagine, the key to the answer is in this process. Alternative initiation of translation at a non-AUG codon has been described in a specific mRNA in yeast (Chang and Wang, 2004 That the yeast expression of the symporter is somehow related to a physiological process in the plant and is not fortuitous is further supported by the fact that the symporter is expressed exclusively in K+-starved cells of the LLF construct of HvHKT1. This conditional expression also applies to mutants 27 and 28, in which there is no AUG initiation codon (Table I). In contrast, the SLF construct of HvHKT1 and mutants with an AUG initiation codon (mutant 19) expressed either the uniporter or the symporter in all conditions (Table I). All these results point out that, when translation is initiated at an AUG codon, the expression of the transporter, either uniport or symport, is constitutive and when translation is initiated at a non-AUG codon, the expression of the transporter depends on the K+ status of the cells. To sum up, K+-starved roots express a K+-inhibitable Na+ uptake that yeast cells transformed with HvHKT1 do not express and K+-starved yeast cells transformed with certain constructs of HvHKT1 express a symport that cannot be detected in roots. Remarkably, both singular processes might be explained by alternative initiations of translation. The simplest conclusion from all this is that, in K+-starved root cells, the HvHKT1 (and TaHKT1) mRNA is translated in an alternative form to produce the K+-inhibitable Na+ transporter and that K+-starved yeast cells try to reproduce it but fail to do so correctly. Perhaps yeast cells do not use the correct non-AUG initiation of translation. Although there are enough physiological differences between plant and yeast cells to explain this failure, the lack of most of the native 5'-nontranslated region of HvHKT1 in our constructs might be the cause of the expression of the artifactual symporter.
Plant Seedlings Barley seeds (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Albacete) were surface sterilized and germinated in filter paper that was wet with a 1.0 mM CaSO4 solution. Then the seeds were transferred to 5- to 10-L plastic containers with a 5 mM CaCl2 solution in which they were supported by cheesecloth stapled to floating frames. Seedlings were grown in the dark for 7 to 10 d at 28°C. The presence of root-associated bacteria or fungi was checked systematically with microbiological counts. In typical batches of plants, the number of bacteria was low and fungi were almost absent. Excised roots were cut approximately 5 mm below the seeds.
The Escherichia coli strain DH5
Manipulation of nucleic acids was performed by standard protocols or, when appropriate, according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCRs were performed in a Perkin-Elmer thermocycler, using the Expand-High-Fidelity PCR system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Some of the PCR fragments were first cloned into the PCR2.1-Topo vector using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). For yeast expression, the cDNAs were cloned into vector pYPGE15 and transformed into the trk1 trk2 yeast mutant, as described previously (Brunelli and Pall, 1993
Oligonucleotide-directed site-specific mutants were constructed by PCR (Good and Nazar, 1992
These experiments were carried out as described previously (Bañuelos et al., 2002
During the induction period of high-affinity Na+ uptake, the exposure of the roots to a K+-free medium produced a permanent loss of K+, which prevented us from testing Na+ uptake in the absence of K+ and, consequently, to investigate whether Na+ uptake was enhanced by K+ (Rubio et al., 1995
All experiments were repeated at least three times. The main source of variability of the results was the Na+ content of the medium where K+ starvation was carried out and the ratio of the mass of roots or yeast cells versus the volume of the starving medium. Both conditions affect the Na+ content of the K+-starved roots and yeast cells and consequently the rates of transport. In the reported experiments, the Na+ content was lower than 5 and 13 nmol mg1 (dry weight) of roots or yeast cells, respectively. In well-standardized roots or yeast cells, the reproducibility of the results was high when the initial rates of uptake were high (with rates >4 nmol min1 mg1, SD <10% of the mean; with rates of approximately 2 nmol min1 mg1, SD Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers AM000056 and AM000057.
We thank Ana Villa for her technical assistance. Received June 22, 2005; returned for revision July 13, 2005; accepted July 13, 2005.
1 This work was supported by the government of Spain (grant no. AGL200405153), Ramón y Cajal fellowship (to M.A.B.), Doctoral Fellowship (to J.B.); by the government of Argentina, CONICET Doctoral Fellowship (to M.E.S.); and by the European Regional Development Fund program of the European Union.
2 These authors contributed equally to the paper. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro (alonso.rodriguez{at}upm.es). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.067553. * Corresponding author; e-mail alonso.rodriguez{at}upm.es; fax 34913365757.
Anderson JA, Huprikar SS, Kochian LV, Lucas WJ, Gaber RF (1992) Functional expression of a probable Arabidopsis thaliana potassium channel in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 37363740
Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285: 12561258
Bañuelos MA, Garciadeblas B, Cubero B, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2002) Inventory and functional characterization of the HAK potassium transporters of rice. Plant Physiol 130: 784795
Benito B, Garciadeblás B, Schreier P, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2004) Novel P-type ATPases mediate high-affinity potassium or sodium uptake in fungi. Eukaryot Cell 3: 359368 Benito B, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2003) Molecular cloning and characterization of a sodium-pump ATPase of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant J 36: 382389[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bennetzen JL, Ma J (2003) The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of genomic sequence analysis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 128133[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Berthomieu P, Conejero G, Nublat A, Brackenbury WJ, Lambert C, Savio C, Uozumi N, Oiki S, Yamada K, Cellier F, et al (2003) Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na(+) recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. EMBO J 22: 20042014[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Blatt MR, Slayman CL (1987) Role of "active" potassium transport in the regulation of cytoplasmic pH by non-animal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 27372741 Blom N, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S (1999) Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J Mol Biol 294: 13511362[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Brunelli JP, Pall ML (1993) A series of yeast/Escherichia coli l expression vectors designed for directional cloning of cDNAs and cre/lox-mediated plasmid excision. Yeast 9: 13091318[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chang K-J, Wang C-C (2004) Translation initiation from a naturally occurring non-AUG codon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 1377813785
Clements JM, Laz TM, Sherman F (1988) Efficiency of translation initiation by non-AUG codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 8: 45334536
Donahue TF, Cigan AM (1988) Genetic selection for mutations that reduce or abolish ribosomal recognition of the HIS4 translational initiator region. Mol Cell Biol 8: 29552963
Drabkin HJ, Rajbhandary UL (1998) Initiation of protein synthesis in mammalian cells with codons other than AUG and amino acids other than methionine. Mol Cell Biol 18: 51405147 Durell SR, Guy HR (1999) Structural models of the KtrB, TrkH and Trk1,2 symporters based on the structure of the KcsA K+ channel. Biophys J 77: 789807[Web of Science][Medline] Garciadeblás B, Senn ME, Bañuelos MA, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2003) Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. Plant J 34: 788801[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Good L, Nazar RN (1992) An improved thermal cycle for two-step PCR-based targeted mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 4934
Guizouarn H, Gabillat N, Motais R, Borgese F (2001) Multiple transport functions of a red blood cell anion exchanger, tAE1: its role in cell volume regulation. J Physiol 535: 497506 Haro R, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2002) Molecular analysis of the mechanism of potassium uptake through the TRK1 transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1564: 114122[Medline] Haro R, Rodríguez-Navarro A (2003) Functional analysis of the M2D helix of the TRK1 potassium transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1613: 16[Medline] Haro R, Sainz L, Rubio F, Rodríguez-Navarro A (1999) Cloning of two genes encoding potassium transporters in Neurospora crassa and expression of the corresponding cDNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 31: 511520[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Hayes DE, Smith FA, Walker NA (2001) High-affinity potassium transport into wheat roots involves sodiuma role for HKT1? Aust J Plant Physiol 28: 643652
Horie T, Schroeder JI (2004) Sodium transporters in plants. Diverse genes and physiological functions. Plant Physiol 136: 24572462 Horie T, Yoshida K, Nakayama H, Yamada K, Oiki S, Shinmyo A (2001) Two types of HKT transporters with different properties of Na+ and K+ transport in Oryza sativa. Plant J 27: 115128[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kato Y, Sakaguchi M, Mori Y, Saito K, Nakamura T, Bakker EP, Sato Y, Goshima S, Uozumi N (2001) Evidence in support of a four transmembrane-pore-transmembrane topology model for the Arabidopsis thaliana Na+/K+ translocating AtHKT1 protein, a member of the superfamily of K+ transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 64886493 Laurie DA, Devos KM (2002) Trends in comparative genetics and their potential impacts on wheat and barley research. Plant Mol Biol 48: 729740[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Laurie S, Feeney KA, Maathuis FJM, Heard PJ, Brown SJ, Leigh RA (2002) A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J 32: 139149[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Maathuis FJM, Verlin D, Smith FA, Sanders D, Fernández JA, Walker NA (1996) The physiological relevance of Na+-coupled K+-transport. Plant Physiol 112: 16091616[Abstract]
Madrid R, Gómez MJ, Ramos J, Rodríguez-Navarro A (1998) Ectopic potassium uptake in trk1 trk2 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae correlates with a highly hyperpolarized membrane potential. J Biol Chem 273: 1483814844 Mäser P, Eckelmann B, Vaidyanathan R, Horie T, Fairbairn DJ, Kubo M, Yamagami M, Yamaguchi K, Nishimura M, Uozumi N, et al (2002a) Altered shoot/root Na+ distribution and bifurcating salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis by genetic disruption of the Na+ transporter AtHKT1. FEBS Lett 531: 157161[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mäser P, Hosoo Y, Goshima S, Horie T, Eckelmann B, Yamada K, Yoshida K, Bakker EP, Shinmyo A, Oiki S, et al (2002b) Glycine residues in potassium channel-like selectivity filters determine potassium selectivity in four-loop-per-subunit HKT transporters from plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 64286433
Quintero JM, Molina R, Fournier JM, Benlloch M, Ramos J (2001) Glucose-induced activation of rubidium transport and water flux in sunflower root systems. J Exp Bot 52: 99104
Rains DW, Epstein E (1967a) Sodium absorption by barley roots: role of the dual mechanisms of alkali cation transport. Plant Physiol 42: 314318
Rains DW, Epstein E (1967b) Sodium absorption by barley roots: its mediation by mechanism 2 of alkali cation transport. Plant Physiol 42: 319323 Ramos J, Haro R, Rodríguez-Navarro A (1990) Regulation of potassium fluxes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1029: 211217[Medline] Ramos J, Rodríguez-Navarro A (1986) Regulation and interconversion of the potassium transport systems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by rubidium transport. Eur J Biochem 154: 307311[Web of Science][Medline]
Rathjen J, Mellor J (1990) Characterization of sequences required for RNA initiation from the PGK promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 32193225 Rhoades JD, Kandiah A, Mashali AM (1992) The Use of Saline Waters for Crop Production. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome Rodríguez-Navarro A (2000) Potassium transport in fungi and plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1469: 130[Medline]
Rodríguez-Navarro A, Ramos J (1984) Dual system for potassium transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 159: 940945
Rubio F, Gassmann W, Schroeder JI (1995) Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science 270: 16601663
Rubio F, Gassmann W, Schroeder JI (1996) High-affinity potassium uptake in plants. Response. Science 273: 978979 Santa-María GE, Rubio F, Dubcovsky J, Rodríguez-Navarro A (1997) The HAK1 gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter. Plant Cell 9: 22812289[Abstract] Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI (1994) Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature 370: 655658[CrossRef][Medline]
Sentenac H, Bonneaud N, Minet M, Lacroute F, Salmon J-M, Gaymard F, Grignon C (1992) Cloning and expression in yeast of a plant potassium ion transport system. Science 256: 663665 Sherman F (1991) Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol 194: 321[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Véry A-A, Sentenac H (2003) Molecular mechanisms and regulation of K+ transport in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 575603[CrossRef][Medline] Walker NA, Sanders D, Maathuis FJM (1996) High-affinity potassium uptake in plants. Science 273: 977978[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wang T-B, Gassmann W, Rubio F, Schroeder JI, Glass ADM (1998) Rapid up-regulation of HKT1, a high-affinity potassium transporter gene, in roots of barley and wheat following withdrawal of potassium. Plant Physiol 118: 651659 Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19: 765768[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|