|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 16, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.070318 Plant Physiology 140:127-139 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists
The Protein Phosphatase AtPP2CA Negatively Regulates Abscisic Acid Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis, and Effects of abh1 on AtPP2CA mRNA1,[W]Division of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, and Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California, La Jolla, California 920930116
To identify new loci in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, we screened a library of 35S::cDNA Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)-expressing lines for ABA-insensitive mutants in seed germination assays. One of the identified mutants germinated on 2.5 µM ABA, a concentration that completely inhibits wild-type seed germination. Backcrosses and F2 analyses indicated that the mutant exhibits a dominant phenotype and that the ABA insensitivity was linked to a single T-DNA insertion containing a 35S::cDNA fusion. The inserted cDNA corresponds to a full-length cDNA of the AtPP2CA gene, encoding a protein phosphatase type 2C (PP2C). Northern-blot analyses demonstrated that the AtPP2CA transcript is indeed overexpressed in the mutant (named PP2CAox). Two independent homozygous T-DNA insertion lines, pp2ca-1 and pp2ca-2, were recovered from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center and shown to lack full-length AtPP2CA expression. A detailed characterization of PP2CAox and the T-DNA disruption mutants demonstrated that, whereas ectopic expression of a 35S::AtPP2CA fusion caused ABA insensitivity in seed germination and ABA-induced stomatal closure responses, disruption mutants displayed the opposite phenotype, namely, strong ABA hypersensitivity. Thus our data demonstrate that the PP2CA protein phosphatase is a strong negative regulator of ABA signal transduction. Furthermore, it has been previously shown that the AtPP2CA transcript is down-regulated in the ABA-hypersensitive nuclear mRNA cap-binding protein mutant abh1. We show here that down-regulation of AtPP2CA in abh1 is not due to impaired RNA splicing of AtPP2CA pre-mRNA. Moreover, expression of a 35S::AtPP2CA cDNA fusion in abh1 partially suppresses abh1 hypersensitivity, and the data further suggest that additional mechanisms contribute to ABA hypersensitivity of abh1.
The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which regulates many agronomically important aspects of plant life, including seed development and dormancy, plays a critical role in plant stress responses such as drought, salinity, cold shock, wounding, and pathogen attack (Schroeder et al., 2001
Whereas the biosynthesis of ABA is well understood (Seo and Koshiba, 2002
Many gene families in the Arabidopsis genome have large numbers of homologs relative to other sequenced genomes (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000
To further enhance the chance of success in identifying new mutants in ABA signaling, we screened a library of 35S::cDNA Arabidopsis-expressing lines (LeClere and Bartel, 2001
Sixty-nine PP2Cs are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome (Kerk et al., 2002
AtPP2CA has been shown to block ABA-induced gene induction when transiently overexpressed in protoplasts (Sheen, 1998
Screening of a 35S::cDNA-Expressing Line Library for ABA-Insensitive Mutants Identifies an Overexpressor of AtPP2CA
Because studies suggest genetic and network redundancy in ABA signal transduction, a screen was pursued that can include dominant ABA-insensitive mutants. Roughly one million seeds were screened from approximately 60,000 activation-tagged lines for ABA-insensitive seed germination at 5 µM ABA. Remarkably, after retesting putative mutants, no robust ABA-insensitive mutant line was isolated from the two activation-tagged populations that were tested twice independently. These findings may be attributed to the robustness of ABA signaling and the inherent limitations in the mutation rate of activation-tagged lines (Weigel et al., 2000
To further enhance the frequency of obtaining dominant mutants in ABA signaling, we screened Arabidopsis lines expressing a library of random 35S::cDNAs (LeClere and Bartel, 2001 Southern-blot analyses revealed that both mutants contained tandem T-DNA insertions at one locus each (data not shown). Segregation analyses of both ABA and Basta resistance in the next generations as well as in F1 and F2 populations from backcrosses indicated that both ABA insensitivities were linked to the corresponding T-DNAs. However, whereas 393.1 was heterozygous for the mutation and its ABA insensitivity was dominant, 54.7 was homozygous and its phenotype was due to a single recessive nuclear mutation. Because the strong ABA insensitivity of the recessive mutant 54.7 was reminiscent of the loss-of-function phenotype of the classic positive regulators of ABA responses ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5, a PCR-based diagnosis was performed on 54.7 genomic DNA (see "Materials and Methods"). This analysis and sequencing showed that 54.7 has a tandem T-DNA insertion located in the first intron of ABI5 approximately 500 bp before the start codon (data not shown). Thus, considering its strong ABA insensitivity and the location of the T-DNA insertion, 54.7 is most likely a new allele of abi5.
The cDNA contained within the T-DNA of the dominant 393.1 mutant was identified by PCR and perfectly matches the full-length cDNA of AtPP2CA, encoding a PP2C (Fig. 1A
). The AtPP2CA gene belongs to group A of the Arabidopsis PP2C gene family (Schweighofer et al., 2004
To further test whether the 35S::AtPP2CA fusion caused the ABA-insensitive phenotype in PP2CAox, the full-length AtPP2CA cDNA was cloned back in the 35SpBARN binary vector (LeClere and Bartel, 2001
To further elucidate the role of AtPP2CA in ABA signaling, we isolated an insertion mutant from the Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory (SIGnAL; Alonso et al., 2003
ABA germination assays were carried out with seeds from pp2ca-1 in parallel with seeds from the PP2CAox line, wild-type plants, and the ABA-hypersensitive mutant, abh1 (Fig. 2A). In the absence of exogenous ABA, pp2ca-1 mutant seeds germinated as well as wild-type seeds (Fig. 2, A and B). And in the presence of 1 µM ABA, a clear ABA-hypersensitive inhibition of seed germination was observed. Indeed, the ABA hypersensitivity of pp2ca-1 was almost as strong as that of abh1 (Fig. 2, A and B). Later, a second T-DNA insertion mutant line WiscDsLox341D03 was released by the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; stock no. CS851888; Sussman et al., 2000
To test whether AtPP2CA gene disruption or constitutive expression of AtPP2CA in plants could affect other ABA responses, and because AtPP2CA was shown to be expressed in the stele of the Arabidopsis root system (Cherel et al., 2002
AtPP2CA is expressed ubiquitously in plant organs with the highest transcript levels in leaves and its expression is up-regulated by stresses, including ABA, cold, drought, and salt treatment (Tahtiharju and Palva, 2001
AtPP2CA Disruption Causes ABA Hypersensitivity in Stomatal Guard Cells
The control of water loss by ABA is a crucial survival mechanism for plants during drought periods. To investigate the role of AtPP2CA in regulating water homeostasis, we measured the loss of fresh weight of detached rosette leaves (Fig. 5A
). Overexpression of the AtPP2CA cDNA in planta led to an approximately 1.5-fold increase in the water-loss rate (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the gene disruption line pp2ca-1 did not exhibit significant differences to transpiration rates of wild-type leaves (Fig. 5A). Similarly, some stomatal ABA response mutants show no detached-leaf water-loss phenotype, including earlier findings on mutant alleles of the PP2Cs ABI1, ABI2, and AtP2C-HAB1 (Gosti et al., 1999
Therefore, we more directly analyzed stomatal movement responses to ABA in loss- and gain-of-function AtPP2CA plants (Fig. 5, B and C). Compared to wild type, guard cells from PP2CAox plants exhibit a clear insensitivity in ABA-induced stomatal closure analyses. Guard cells in these plants show a significantly reduced response to 10 µM ABA, which clearly results in stomatal closure in wild-type plants (Fig. 5B). In contrast, AtPP2CA gene disruption results in an ABA-hypersensitive stomatal closure response at 1 µM ABA (Fig. 5B for pp2ca-1, and 5C for pp2ca-2). These data show that AtPP2CA plays an important role in ABA signal transduction events and the regulation of stomatal aperture. Analyses of stomatal aperture responses (Fig. 5, B and C) and ratios of stomatal apertures to stomatal heights illustrate the same findings in AtPP2CA disruption and gain-of-function lines (Supplemental Fig. 1, B and C).
Interestingly, the AtPP2CA mRNA was previously shown to exhibit a reduced mRNA level in the ABA-hypersensitive abh1 mutant (Hugouvieux et al., 2001
ABH1 is the Arabidopsis homolog of an 80-kD subunit of the dimeric mRNA cap-binding complex, which additionally consists of a 20-kD subunit, AtCBP20 (Hugouvieux et al., 2001
RT-PCR on DNase-treated total RNA from leaves yielded similar amplification product qualities and quantities for all four reactions (Fig. 6B). PCR product 1 resulted in a single band corresponding to the full-length reading frame. PCR product 2, with the forward primer location in the first intron, showed faint bands with sizes corresponding to a fully unspliced pre-mRNA (1,028 nucleotides). PCR product 2 also resulted in splice intermediates emerging from intron I independent of removal of intron II or intron III (936 nucleotides) and even removal of both introns II and III (844 nucleotides) from the pre-mRNA without remarkable differences between wild type and abh1 (Fig. 6B). This holds equally true for PCR products 3 and 4 (Fig. 6B). Identical results were obtained for an analysis on RNA isolated from independently grown plants (data not shown). We conclude from these results that splicing of the AtPP2CA pre-mRNA is not affected in the abh1 background and down-regulation of AtPP2CA transcripts is more likely caused by other mechanisms. To elucidate whether elevated transcript levels of AtPP2CA can restore normal ABA sensitivity or even cause ABA insensitivity in abh1, we transformed wild-type (Col-0) and abh1 plants with a AtPP2CA cDNA under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in a binary vector different from 35SpBARN (see "Materials and Methods"). Forty independent T1 plants were isolated each for wild type and for abh1 and tested for ABA responses. Individual lines with single-insertion segregation patterns and the strongest ABA insensitivity in seed germination were selected to obtain homozygous lines. ABA germination assays were performed in triplicate and confirmed earlier findings (Fig. 2C) that introduction of a 35S::AtPP2CA fusion in the wild type always confers a strong ABA insensitivity in seed germination independent of the binary vector used (data not shown).
In the abh1 background, ectopic expression of the AtPP2CA cDNA had a much weaker effect than in the wild-type background, with only two homozygous single-insertion lines being able to restore wild-type-like ABA responses during germination (Fig. 7A
, white diamonds). Most of the 40 abh1 mutant lines expressing the 35S::AtPP2CA construct exhibited a range of ABA sensitivities between abh1 and wild type in T2 generation germination experiments (data not shown). Based on the hypothesis that abh1 might affect AtPP2CA transcripts in these constitutively cDNA-expressing lines, we tested AtPP2CA transcript integrity in RT-PCR experiments (Fig. 7B). Amplification of the full-length reading frame resulted in a single band in all lines investigated, indicating no detectable qualitative impact of abh1 on the full-length transcripts (Fig. 7B). Ratiometric analysis of the AtPP2CA transcript levels, with elongation factor 1
Here we report isolation of a strong dominant ABA response mutant overexpressing the AtPP2CA cDNA during an ABA-insensitive screen of a library of 33,000 35S::cDNA-expressing Arabidopsis lines. We characterize AtPP2CA gene disruption and overexpression phenotypes in Arabidopsis. We show that T-DNA insertions in the AtPP2CA gene result in a strongly increased sensitivity to the phytohormone ABA during seed germination (Fig. 2, A and B; Supplemental Fig. 1A) and also render guard cells more sensitive to ABA during stomatal closure at 1 µM ABA (Fig. 5, B and C) and affect root elongation in the presence of exogenous ABA (Fig. 3, C and D). On the other hand, overexpression of AtPP2CA impairs stomatal closure in response to 10 µM ABA (Fig. 5B). Seed germination of PP2CAox lines displays a greatly decreased sensitivity to ABA (Fig. 2, A and C). Moreover, constitutive expression of AtPP2CA in the ABA-hypersensitive mutant abh1 is shown to partially restore ABA sensitivity in abh1 (Fig. 7A). Together, these results point to an important function of AtPP2CA as a negative regulator of ABA signal transduction events. The identification of a negative regulator in ABA signaling based on a cDNA overexpression screen shows that this approach can be used to isolate mutants in genes that modulate complex signaling networks in plants (Schroeder et al., 2001
In an earlier study, AtPP2CA was shown to be linked to cold acclimation in Arabidopsis (Tahtiharju and Palva, 2001
We report that AtPP2CA gene disruption lines show a strongly increased sensitivity to ABA during seed germination, which appears to be more pronounced than in a AtP2C-HAB1 disruption line (Leonhardt et al., 2004
Application of exogenous ABA is well established to affect root growth as an antagonist of auxin, impairing cell elongation and causing an arrest in mitotic cell cycle activity (Himmelbach et al., 1998
Furthermore, we show that ectopic expression of AtPP2CA results in increased transpiration rates of detached rosette leaves (Fig. 5A). It has been shown previously that the dominant ABA-insensitive mutants abi1-1 and abi2-1 are sensitive to water stress conditions and impair early ABA signal transduction (Koornneef et al., 1984
Sixty-nine PP2C genes are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome compared to 15 PP2C genes in humans (Kerk et al., 2002
AtPP2CA transcript levels are the second highest expressed of all group A PP2Cs in dry seeds of Arabidopsis and are significantly down-regulated upon imbibition (Supplemental Fig. 2; Zimmermann et al., 2004
Despite the large gene family of PP2Cs and similar expression patterns of AtP2C-HAB1 and AtPP2CA, the limited functional redundancy in single gene disruption lines during the process of ABA signal transduction in seeds and guard cells may imply a high degree of specificity toward downstream targets of these two PP2Cs. In plants, our knowledge about PP2C targets is still limited and no target has been identified for AtP2C-HAB1. However, the inward-rectifying potassium channel AKT2 was shown to interact with AtPP2CA in yeast and AKT2 channel activity is negatively modulated by AtPP2CA in heterologous expression systems (Cherel et al., 2002
The abh1 mutation causes ABA hypersensitivity in seed germination and stomatal movements and modulates ion channel activities in guard cells (Hugouvieux et al., 2001 In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that AtPP2CA down-regulation in abh1 contributes to the ABA hypersensitivity in abh1. Constitutive expression of AtPP2CA in the abh1 mutant suppressed the ABA hypersensitivity of abh1 plants. Interestingly, however, overexpression did not render abh1 plants as ABA-insensitive as 35S::AtPP2CA wild-type plants (Fig. 7A). Out of 40 abh1 plants harboring the 35S::AtPP2CA construct, only two homozygous single-insertion lines resulted in ABA sensitivity similar to wild-type plants in seed germination experiments. The comparison of AtPP2CA transcript levels by RT-PCR in these gain-of-function lines revealed that the AtPP2CA transcript levels were up to 1.5-fold higher than the AtPP2CA transcript level in abh1, but still significantly lower than in wild-type plants (Fig. 7B). Because the identification of strong AtPP2CA gain-of-function phenotypes in the abh1 background proved substantially more difficult than in wild type, a negative feedback mechanism may limit AtPP2CA expression in abh1. With AtPP2CA gene disruption lines being less ABA hypersensitive in seed germination than abh1 (Fig. 2, A and B) and because AtPP2CA overexpression only partially restores wild-type-like ABA sensitivity in abh1, we conclude that additional mechanisms contribute to ABA hypersensitivity in abh1.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that the protein phosphatase AtPP2CA acts as a strong negative regulator of ABA signal transduction during seed germination (Fig. 2A) and the regulation of stomatal closure (Fig. 5B). Yoshida et al. (2006)
Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and Transformation Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants (Col-0) were grown in a Conviron growth chamber (Controlled Environments Limited) in plastic pots filled with ready-to-use soil (Professional Blend). After sowing, pots were kept at 4°C for 4 to 7 d. Growing conditions were 22°C, 75% humidity, with a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod regime at approximately 75 µmol m2 s1. Seeds used for comparative studies were from plants grown and harvested in parallel.
Seeds of the activation-tagged lines for identification of ABA-insensitive mutants were kindly provided by D. Weigel (Max-Planck-Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany; Weigel et al., 2000
Given the recessive nature of the strong ABA insensitivity in the homozygous 54.7 mutant, we hypothesized that its phenotype could be mediated by disruption of positive regulators such as ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5. To test this hypothesis, PCR on genomic DNA from 54.7 and wild-type plants with a set of specific primers for ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 (Table I) was carried out. Only one PCR reaction with ABI5-F3/ABI5-R2 primers (Table I) did not lead to any products from 54.7 genomic DNA (data not shown). PCR genotyping reactions from 54.7 genomic DNA were then carried out with ABI5-F3/ABI5-R2 and with BARN-LB1 (Table I; Fig. 1A), a specific primer of the 35SpBARN T-DNA left border. This led to amplification of two PCR products whose sequencing showed that a tandem T-DNA insertion occurred in the first intron of ABI5 approximately 500 bp before the start codon. pp2ca-1 and pp2ca-2 mutants of the AtPP2CA gene (At3g11410) were obtained from ABRC and correspond to the SALK_028132 and WiscDsLox341D03 lines, respectively. Genotyping PCR reactions for pp2ca-1 and pp2ca-2 were performed with PP2CAEx1-F/PP2CAEx4-R primers and with PP2CAEx1-F/SALK-LBa1 primers (SALK_028132) or with PP2CAEx1-F/p745 primers (WiscDsLox341D03) and amplified products were sequenced (Table I).
The cDNA within the T-DNA of 393.1 plants was PCR amplified from genomic DNA with 35S-F/NOS-R primers (Table I; Fig. 1A) and purified with the QIAEX II kit (Qiagen). The amplified DNA was then cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and sequenced. Because the PCR fragment matched the full-length cDNA of AtPP2CA perfectly, it was then excised from pGEM-T Easy with SmaI and NotI restriction enzymes, subcloned into SmaI/NotI linearized 35SpBARN vector (Fig. 1A; LeClere and Bartel, 2001 Vector PS173 (kindly provided by Professor Jeff F. Harper, University of Nevada, Reno) was used to constitutively express AtPP2CA cDNA in wild-type and abh1 plants. After amplification from total wild-type (Col-0) cDNA (first-strand cDNA synthesis kit; Amersham Biosciences) and cloning the AtPP2CA cDNA into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), the sequenced cDNA was excised with SalI and SpeI restriction enzymes and subcloned into the PS173 vector previously digested with XhoI and XbaI restriction enzymes.
Total RNA was extracted from leaves using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies/Gibco-BRL) and quantified by absorption and migration of an aliquot on agarose gel. For ABA and drought treatments, rosette leaves of 3- to 4-week-old wild-type plants were either sprayed with 50 µM ABA or excised and subjected to desiccation for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, or 12 h before extraction. Fifteen micrograms of total RNA were separated in a denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gel and blotted to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham-Pharmacia). Blots were hybridized with random-priming 32P-labeled probes (Megaprime DNA labeling system; Amersham-Pharmacia). AtPP2CA and ACTIN7 probes were amplified by PCR from cDNA using PP2CAEx1-F/PP2CAEx4-R and ACTIN7-F/ACTIN7-R primers, respectively (Table I). PCR fragments were purified using the QIAEX II kit (Qiagen).
RT-PCR experiments were performed on total RNA isolated as described above after DNase I treatment (DNA-free; Ambion). Reverse transcription (first-strand cDNA synthesis kit, Amersham Biosciences) was performed on 2.5 µg of RNA and 2 µL were used for PCR reactions (Ex Taq DNA polymerase; TaKaRa Mirus Bio). Samples were withdrawn after 20, 24, 28, and 32 cycles (splicing) or 28, 32, and 36 cycles (T-DNA disruption lines) and products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Hybridization/PCR signals were quantified using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 software (Adobe Systems) after subtraction of background levels. Expression levels for northern-blot and RT-PCR analyses were normalized against the corresponding ACTIN7 and EF1
For ABA germination assays, sterilized seeds were plated on minimal medium (0.25x Murashige and Skoog medium, no Suc) supplemented with increasing ABA concentrations. After stratification of 4 d at 4°C, plates were transferred to a Conviron growth chamber (Controlled Environments Limited). To score seed germination, the percentage of seeds that had germinated and developed fully green expanded cotyledons was determined in three independent experiments (36 seeds per genotype and experiment). Root growth assays to assess ABA sensitivity were carried out by transferring 6-d-old seedlings onto minimal medium (0.25x Murashige and Skoog medium, no Suc) supplemented with the indicated ABA concentrations on 0.8% agar (Phytagel; Sigma) plates. Root growth was measured 6 d after the transfer in three independent experiments with eight individuals per genotype and experiment. t-Test (one-tailed, homoscedastic) P-values are as follows: pp2ca-1, P = 3.6E-07 (2.5 µM ABA); P = 3.3E-06 (5 µM ABA); P = 4.6E-04 (10 µM ABA); P = 1.6 E-07 (25 µM ABA); and P = 6.8E-06 (50 µM ABA). pp2ca-2, P = 9.7E-06 (2.5 µM ABA); P = 6.5E-06 (5 µM ABA); P = 7.2E-05 (10 µM ABA); P = 8.9E-13 (25 µM ABA); and P = 1.2E-07 (50 µM ABA).
Time-dependent analyses of loss of fresh weight were performed with detached rosette leaves at the same developmental stage and size from single 3-week-old plants. Three leaves per genotype were excised, kept in the Conviron growth chamber (Controlled Environments Limited), and fresh weight was measured at the indicated periods of time in three independent experiments.
Double-blind stomatal movement assays were performed such that the genotype and applied ABA concentrations were unknown. Stomatal responses were analyzed in 3- to 4-week-old plants grown in a Conviron growth chamber. Leaves were floated for 2.5 h in stomatal opening solution (Pei et al., 1997 Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession number NM_111974.
We thank David Waner and Majse Nafisi for screening the activation-tagging populations, Bonnie Bartel for providing the 35SpBARN vector as well as helpful discussions, Nadia Robert, Jean Colcombet, and Dongyul Sung for discussions, and Taehoun Kim and Jared Young for comments on the manuscript. Received August 24, 2005; returned for revision October 13, 2005; accepted October 23, 2005.
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (R01GM060396) and National Science Foundation (MCB0417118) grants (to J.I.S.), and by a European Molecular Biology Organization fellowship (to J.M.K.).
2 These authors contributed equally to the paper. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Julian I. Schroeder (julian{at}biomail.ucsd.edu).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.070318. * Corresponding author; email julian{at}biomail.ucsd.edu; fax 8585347108.
Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15: 6378 Allen GJ, Kuchitsu K, Chu SP, Murata Y, Schroeder JI (1999) Arabidopsis abi1-1 and abi2-1 phosphatase mutations reduce abscisic acid induced cytoplasmic calcium rises in guard cells. Plant Cell 11: 17851798 Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653657 Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana Nature 408: 796815[CrossRef][Medline] Beaudoin N, Serizet C, Gosti F, Giraudat J (2000) Interactions between abscisic acid and ethylene signaling cascades. Plant Cell 12: 11031116 Brocard-Gifford I, Lynch TJ, Garcia ME, Malhotra B, Finkelstein RR (2004) The Arabidopsis thaliana ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE8 encodes a novel protein mediating abscisic acid and sugar responses essential for growth. Plant Cell 16: 406421 Cherel I, Michard E, Platet N, Mouline K, Alcon C, Sentenac H, Thibaud JB (2002) Physical and functional interaction of the Arabidopsis K(+) channel AKT2 and phosphatase AtPP2CA. Plant Cell 14: 11331146 Clark TA, Sugnet CW, Ares M Jr (2002) Genomewide analysis of mRNA processing in yeast using splicing-specific microarrays. Science 296: 907910 Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735743[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Cominelli E, Galbiati M, Vavasseur A, Conti L, Sala T, Vuylsteke M, Leonhardt N, Dellaporta SL, Tonelli C (2005) A guard-cell-specific MYB transcription factor regulates stomatal movements and plant drought tolerance. Curr Biol 15: 11961200[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Cutler S, Ghassemian M, Bonetta D, Cooney S, McCourt P (1996) A protein farnesyl transferase involved in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Science 273: 12391241[Abstract] Cutler S, McCourt P (2005) Dude, where's my phenotype? Dealing with redundancy in signaling networks. Plant Physiol 138: 558559 Fan LM, Zhao Z, Assmann SM (2004) Guard cells: a dynamic signaling model. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 537546[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Fedoroff NV (2002) Cross-talk in abscisic acid signaling. Sci STKE 2002: RE10[Medline] Finkelstein RR (1994) Maternal effects govern variable dominance of two abscisic acid response mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 105: 12031208[Abstract] Finkelstein RR, Gampala SS, Rock CD (2002) Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell (Suppl) 14: S15S45 Finkelstein RR, Lynch TJ (2000) The Arabidopsis abscisic acid response gene ABI5 encodes a basic leucine zipper transcription factor. Plant Cell 12: 599610 Finkelstein RR, Wang ML, Lynch TJ, Rao S, Goodman HM (1998) The Arabidopsis abscisic acid response locus ABI4 encodes an APETALA 2 domain protein. Plant Cell 10: 10431054 Fortes P, Kufel J, Fornerod M, Polycarpou-Schwarz M, Lafontaine D, Tollervey D, Mattaj IW (1999) Genetic and physical interactions involving the yeast nuclear cap-binding complex. Mol Cell Biol 19: 65436553 Ghassemian M, Nambara E, Cutler S, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y, McCourt P (2000) Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 11171126 Giraudat J, Hauge BM, Valon C, Smalle J, Parcy F, Goodman HM (1992) Isolation of the Arabidopsis ABI3 gene by positional cloning. Plant Cell 4: 12511261 Gosti F, Beaudoin N, Serizet C, Webb AAR, Vartanian N, Giraudat J (1999) ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 11: 18971910 Guo Y, Xiong L, Song CP, Gong D, Halfter U, Zhu JK (2002) A calcium sensor and its interacting protein kinase are global regulators of abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 3: 233244[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901908[CrossRef][Medline] Himmelbach A, Hoffmann T, Leube M, Hohener B, Grill E (2002) Homeodomain protein ATHB6 is a target of the protein phosphatase ABI1 and regulates hormone responses in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 21: 3029303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||