This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Agricola Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Related Collections Reactive Oxygen Species

Update on Metabolomics and Proteomics of Oxidative Stress

Metabolic and Proteomic Markers for Oxidative Stress. New Tools for Reactive Oxygen Species Research¹

Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 (V.S.); and Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010 (D.J.O.)

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a significant role in plant growth, development, and interaction with biotic and abiotic environments (Alvarez et al., 1998; Blokhina et al., 2003). ROS have also been implicated as important regulatory and signaling elements in a variety of cellular processes (Foyer and Noctor, 2005). ROS are constantly produced during the course of photosynthesis and respiration, whereas redox homeostasis in the cell is tightly controlled by redundant protective mechanisms. Disruption of these protective mechanisms can cause oxidative stress, leading to oxidative damage and cell death. Measuring oxidative stress in the cell requires sensitive and robust assays for ROS detection, accurate quantitation, and measurements of intrinsic cell defense responses.

Measurement of ROS in living organisms carries a significant analytical challenge. Most ROS are highly reactive and short lived and therefore hard to detect in complex biological matrices. Additionally, ROS often are produced and/or detoxified in subcellular compartments, which requires detection methods directed to specific subcellular localization. ROS can be measured either directly or indirectly following the formation of oxidative by-products of lipids, proteins, or nucleic acids (a technique often called fingerprinting). Techniques to measure these reactive intermediates have been extensively reviewed (for a recent review, see Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004; Tarpey et al., 2004). Here we mainly focus on recent applications of these techniques to measure ROS in plants.

	DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS BY ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
ROS can be detected directly by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR; or electron spin resonance), which can also be used to monitor changes in the chemical forms of the oxidizable transition metal ions implicated in ROS generation (Khan and Swartz, 2002; Jackson et al., 2004). Because of the low sensitivity of EPR, it is extremely difficult to measure highly reactive radicals directly in vivo. To overcome this sensitivity issue, a technique called spin trapping is often used. In spin-trapping experiments, ROS are allowed to react with specially selected trap molecules to produce less reactive and more stable species that can be readily detected by EPR (Khan et al., 2003). EPR is being widely used to detect ROS in plants (for a recent review, see Bacic and Mojovic, 2005). Generally, overlap between different signals in the EPR spectrum makes it difficult to quantitatively measure individual ROS in plants and therefore EPR is often used to assess total free radical formation (Muckenschnabel et al., 2002).

The major advantage of EPR is its ability to measure and localize ROS in vivo. The latest progress in EPR techniques combined with the development of new spin traps (for review, see Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004) allows for noninvasive mapping of ROS in vivo in the whole animal. In vivo mapping using EPR spectroscopy with nitroxyl probes generating stable nitroxyl radicals, combined with other tomographic techniques, is an example of the new tools available for noninvasive detection and real-time monitoring of ROS formation, studying tissue localization and analyzing the effects of antioxidants on ROS detoxification and prevention of oxidative damage (Utsumi and Yamada, 2003; Utsumi et al., 2006). These exciting new EPR techniques are yet to be fully exploited by plant researchers.

The major limitation for using EPR with spin trapping to measure ROS in plants is the necessity to infiltrate spin trap molecules into the cells. In many cases, cytotoxicity and cellular permeability of the trapping agents have not been studied sufficiently in plant systems and their infiltration into plant tissues can cause additional stress and affect the levels of the ROS and other signaling compounds in the cell. One way to overcome this limitation is to engineer plants that can synthesize EPR-compatible ROS-trapping molecules in vivo to allow for truly noninvasive monitoring of ROS formation.

	MEASURING SUPEROXIDE

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
The detection of superoxide can be achieved by EPR with superoxide-specific spin probes (i.e. 5,5-dimethylpyrroline-N-oxide, 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide, or triarylmethyl radical Ox063), using assays based on the superoxide's ability to reduce cytochrome c, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), and other compounds, or with chemiluminescence or fluorescence-based methods (i.e. lucigenin assay). The NBT assay can also be used for histochemical localization of superoxide. Infiltration of leaves with NBT leads to the formation of a dark blue insoluble formazen compound that can be detected microscopically to localize superoxide generation in plant tissues (Flohe and Otting, 1984). This assay was used, for example, to localize superoxide production in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaves subjected to light stress (Fryer et al., 2002, 2003).

The majority of superoxide detection methods is subject to artifacts and should be interpreted with caution (for review, see Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004). Major drawbacks of both in vitro and histochemical assays are their low specificity and sensitivity. Many compounds besides superoxide can reduce cytochrome c or NBT, skewing the superoxide levels measured with these techniques. On the other hand, oxidation of lucigenin by some compounds can cause artificial superoxide production. Murphy et al. (1998) surveyed several assays to measure superoxide levels in different subcellular fractions of rose (Rosa damascena) cells and concluded that none of the assays can be used to compare superoxide production in different cellular compartments. Generally, superoxide measurement should be done with multiple controls and must be validated by alternative techniques.

	MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
Several methods have been developed to measure hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in living tissues (for review, see Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1999). Common horseradish (Armoracia lapathifolia) peroxidase assays rely on H₂O₂-dependent oxidation of a nonfluorescent substrate to form a fluorescent product that can be easily detected (Andreae, 1955). A variety of substrates, including 4-aminoantipyrine, scopoletin, Amplex Red (N-acetyl-3,7-dihydrophenoxazine), dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA), and homovanillic acid, are employed in these assays. Ease of use and availability of commercial kits have made peroxidase assays a popular technique for estimating H₂O₂ levels in isolated subcellular fractions. This approach was used to measure H₂O₂ concentration in soluble fractions, mitochondria, and peroxisomes purified from pea (Pisum sativum) leaves during senescence (Jimenez et al., 1998) and H₂O₂ released from germinating radish (Raphanus sativus) seeds controlled by light, gibberellin, and abscisic acid (Schopfer et al., 2001). Orozco-Cárdenas and Ryan (2002) used a commercially available Amplex Red H₂O₂ detection kit for H₂O₂ quantitation in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) leaf extracts.

Histochemical staining methods provide an advantage over other assays because they allow for subcellular localization of H₂O₂, although, in many cases, these assays are semiquantitative. Additionally, probes used for histochemical detection of ROS have different permeability and may accumulate in a particular cellular compartment (i.e. DCFDA accumulates preferentially in the cytosol), complicating interpretation of the results. Leaf infiltration with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) is a common technique used to localize H₂O₂ in plants (Thordal-Christensen et al., 1997). DAB reacts rapidly with H₂O₂ in the presence of peroxidase, forming a brown polymerization product. The DAB assay was used to detect H₂O₂ in leaves interacting with the powdery mildew fungus (Thordal-Christensen et al., 1997) to localize H₂O₂ production caused by high light stress in Arabidopsis (Fryer et al., 2002), to detect H₂O₂ generated in response to wounding (Orozco-Cardenas and Ryan, 1999), and to monitor H₂O₂ accumulation in knockout Apx1 plants (Davletova et al., 2005). Another widely used cytochemical assay is based on the H₂O₂ reaction with cerium chloride to produce electron-dense precipitates of cerium perhydroxides (Bestwick et al., 1997). An example of the successful application of this technique is the localization of H₂O₂ accumulation during the hypersensitive reaction of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cells to Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola (Bestwick et al., 1997) and in the plasma membrane and apoplast of the anoxia-tolerant Iris pseudacorus and rice (Oryza sativa) and the anoxia-intolerant wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Iris germanica plants during anoxia and reoxygenation (Blokhina et al., 2001).

As with superoxide detection, many methods commonly used to measure H₂O₂, including DAB and DCFDA assays, suffer from low specificity and therefore often do not measure a particular ROS but rather generalized oxidative stress in the cell (Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004).

	MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
Measuring the end products of lipid peroxidation is one of the most widely accepted assays for oxidative damage and has been extensively used in plants. ROS cause peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, producing ,-unsaturated aldehydes such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA; Hartley et al., 1999). These aldehydic secondary products of lipid peroxidation are generally accepted markers of oxidative stress (Del et al., 2005). Several analytical techniques can be used to assay for lipid peroxidation (for review, see Halliwell et al., 1992; Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004).

A popular thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay for MDA is based on its reaction with TBA followed by measuring A₅₃₂ (Draper and Hadley, 1990; Hodges et al., 1999). The TBA assay and its modifications were used to measure lipid peroxidation in plants exposed to UV irradiation (Hodges et al., 1999), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings exposed to temperature stress (Mahan and Mauget, 2005), and transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) expressing glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase under stress conditions (Roxas et al., 2000). Results of the simple TBA assay should be interpreted with caution because it was shown that, in many cases, TBA-reactive substances are not related to lipid peroxidation (for review, see Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004).

Recent progress in mass spectrometry (MS) has prompted the development of more accurate and sensitive methods for 4-HNE, MDA, and other lipid peroxidation products (Deighton et al., 1997; Liu et al., 1997). A method developed by Deighton et al. (1997) is based on the highly sensitive liquid chromatography-MS detection of the 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) hydrazine (DNPH) derivatives of 4-HNE and MDA. The limits of detection for the 4-HNE and MDA DNP derivatives were approximately 5 pmol and 0.1 pmol, respectively, with linear MS response in the range from 2 to 200 µM for DNP-MDA and 0.02 to 10 µM for DNP-4-HNE. This method was validated by measuring the formation of 4-HNE and MDA in dedifferentiated callus cultures of carrot (Daucus carota; Deighton et al., 1997) and in the spreading soft-rot lesions caused by the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea in leaves of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris; Muckenschnabel et al., 2001).

One considerable advantage of MS-based methods is the ability to identify individual lipid species targeted by ROS and to detect the various oxidative products formed (Byrdwell and Neff, 2002). Following the formation of oxidized intermediates and stable oxidized molecular species can help to demonstrate the molecular mechanisms of lipid oxidation and to identify new physiological biomarkers of oxidative stress. The development of sensitive MS methods for measuring lipid peroxidation marks significant progress in the field.

	MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
The chemistry of ROS-induced DNA damage has been extensively studied in vitro and in vivo (for review, see Beckman and Ames, 1997). ROS can cause DNA strand breaks or modification to deoxyribose sugar and bases. Several common DNA adducts resulting from oxidative damage have been characterized (Gedik et al., 2002). Formation of the 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanine, and DNA-MDA adducts are the most characteristic features of DNA oxidation (Bruskov et al., 2002). These metabolic markers form the basis for the majority of assays aimed at measuring oxidative DNA damage.

Despite the fact that measuring oxidative DNA damage is one of the most widely used approaches to quantify oxidative stress in animals and humans, application of this approach in plants is very limited. In one of a few studies on plants, Bialkowski and Olinski (1999) measured the level of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in the DNA of Cardamine pratensis plants to estimate the level of total oxidative DNA damage.

	CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION BY ROS

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
Early studies using ROS generated by ionizing radiation suggested that activated oxygen has the potential to react with nearly all amino acid side groups as well as cleaving the polypeptide backbone (for review, see Garrison, 1987). The most studied types of protein oxidations are those that result in the formation of reactive carbonyl groups (ketones and aldehydes) because these are the most easily tracked experimentally. Carbonyl groups can be the product of a reaction between amino acid side groups (usually Lys, Arg, Pro, or Thr) and hydroxyl radicals. They can also result when the products of the reaction between ROS and lipids (4-HNE and MDA) or carbohydrates (ketoamines and ketoaldehydes) react with amino acid side chains (for review, see Berlett and Stadtman, 1997).

For illustrative purposes, Figure 1 shows the mechanism for ROS-driven conversion of a Lys residue to an -aminoadipic semialdehyde residue as proposed by Stadtman and Oliver (1991). In this model, a ferric (or cupric) ion is reduced by superoxide to form a ferrous ion that binds to a cation binding site on a protein where one residue is a Lys. The bound metal then reacts with H₂O₂ to form a hydroxyl radical that in turn leads to the production of a carbon radical. This radical can lead to cleavage of the polypeptide backbone, cross-linking of two polypeptide chains, or, as illustrated, hydrolysis of the -amino group to leave an aldehyde.

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Proposed reaction for the oxidation of Lys residue to form a carbonyl (aldehyde) from Stadtman and Oliver (1991).

	MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

Bulk measurements of protein oxidation provide a simple independent measure of oxidative stress that can confirm conclusions based on determining the formation of lipid oxidation products. The DNPH system, however, becomes much more powerful when coupled with the commercially available anti-DNP antibodies (Shacter et al., 1994). These antibodies allow both immunodetection and immunoenrichment to be applied to protein oxidation studies. Standard spectrophotometric determinations of DNP have a lower detection limit of about 1 nmol/mg protein. This sensitivity can be increased at least 10-fold by using an antibody-based ELISA (Buss et al., 1997). Western blots, although only semiquantitative, can detect as little as 1 pmol of DNP-modified carbonyl groups per milligram of protein (Keller et al., 1993; Shacter et al., 1994).

More qualitative data are available by combining the anti-DNP antibody with one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A commercial kit is available for this analysis (OxyBlot kit; Chemicon International; Rizhsky et al., 2004; Davletova et al., 2005; Job et al., 2005). Once the proteins have been separated on gels and the oxidized proteins tagged by western blotting, MS can be used to identify the specific individual proteins that are oxidized (Johansson et al., 2004; Kristensen et al., 2004; Davletova et al., 2005; Job et al., 2005). Some of the problems associated with two-dimensional gels (limited number of proteins, difficulty in solubilizing membrane proteins for the first dimension, poor resolution of some protein groups, and recalcitrance to high-throughput applications) can be addressed by using immunopurification methods to enrich the DNP-derivatized proteins (Kristensen et al., 2004; Davletova et al., 2005). Antibody-based column purification can be used before the gel electrophoresis systems or proteins from the immunoaffinity columns can be analyzed directly by liquid chromatography-tandem MS. Due to the difficulties of getting quantitative data from MS experiments, the use of techniques like isotope-coded affinity tags (Gygi et al., 1999) allows analysis of the amount of proteins oxidized in different samples. Medical researchers are attempting to correlate the oxidation of a group of proteins with a specific disease. It will be interesting to see whether protein oxidation patterns are diagnostic of particular stress states in plants.

	ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE STRESS

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
One of the unique advantages of incorporating studies on oxidative stress of protein is that it maintains some spatial information on the localization of the stress. Whereas H₂O₂ can cross cell membranes, superoxides and hydroxide radicals cannot, so such information is useful in localizing where ROS is produced and oxidative stress is experienced. This type of spatial information can be obtained in several ways. Organelles can be isolated by traditional biochemical techniques and then oxidized proteins within those preparations can be determined, or if proteomics techniques are used and the specific oxidized proteins are identified, bioinformatics methods can be used to determine the subcellular localization of a protein from a whole cell extract (Davletova et al., 2005). DNPH derivatization and immunological tagging can also be done on intact organs (Smith et al., 1998) and these microscopy techniques have been extended to plants (Y. Xiong and D.C. Bassham, unpublished data).

	CONCLUDING REMARKS

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
The production and scavenging of ROS is central to a broad range of stress and physiological responses in plants. Techniques capable of directly measuring ROS in vivo and tracking lipids, nucleic acids, and protein oxidation can augment these studies by providing, among other things, a spatial component to the localization of stress at the tissue, cellular, and subcellular level. In addition, the tools for studying protein oxidation and protein turnover may uncover new mechanisms for regulating protein activities.

Because ROS are a highly reactive and short-lived species that do not accumulate to high levels, it is not possible to measure them directly; rather, one must measure either the accumulation of biomolecules or the exogenously added indicators that are modified by ROS. All of these assays are prone to numerous artifacts resulting from sample preparation and storage or from the analytical method itself, and all are limited in their ability to differentiate between different ROS molecules (for review, see Halliwell and Whiteman, 2004). The choice of which assay will be used, therefore, is a compromise between ease, ability to collect real-time data, need for spatial information, and instrumentation available. At present, real-time measures of ROS and oxidative stress are limited and there are no truly noninvasive methods. Even spin trapping alters cellular ROS levels during the assay. Measurements of oxidative damage to lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins are endpoint measures and have not been adapted to collecting real-time data. Whereas studies on lipid peroxidation might provide some information on the structure of the initial lipid, which can contribute information on the subcellular localization of stress, protein oxidation studies using either MS, cytochemical methods, or ROS tracer dyes (Fryer et al., 2002; Davletova et al., 2005) make it possible to localize stress to the cellular or subcellular level. Real-time imaging of the redox changes using redox-sensitive green fluorescent proteins, which has been used in animal studies (Dooley et al., 2004), may provide additional information on subcellular location of ROS production, although novel radical-specific proteins or other probes will be required to identify individual ROS species responsible for alterations in redox balance.

Recent advances in analytical techniques, especially EPR and MS, already provide more accurate and quantitative ways to measure ROS in the cell. Measurements of the oxidative stress response and cellular redox status can provide a broader view of the impact of ROS formation on plants. Dynamic imaging of redox changes with redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (Dooley et al., 2004) and the use of DNA microarrays to dissect global transcriptional effects of oxidative stress (Davletova et al., 2005) are examples of new approaches for studying cellular responses to ROS damage. Future progress in genomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and systems biology will result in more studies on global cellular responses to oxidative stress on transcript, protein, and metabolite levels, providing data for mathematical modeling of the biochemical networks involved.

Received February 12, 2006; returned for revision March 31, 2006; accepted March 31, 2006.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Science (grant no. R01–GM068947–01), the National Science Foundation (grant nos. MCB–03128257 and MCB–0520140), the U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Research Initiative (grant no. 2002–03442), and the Plant Sciences Institute at Iowa State University.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Vladimir Shulaev (vshulaev{at}vbi.vt.edu).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.077925.

^* Corresponding author; e-mail vshulaev{at}vbi.vt.edu; fax 540–231–2606.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ROS... MEASURING SUPEROXIDE MEASURING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MEASURING LIPID PEROXIDATION MEASURING NUCLEIC ACID OXIDATION CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN OXIDATION... MEASURING PROTEIN OXIDATION ABILITY TO LOCALIZE OXIDATIVE... CONCLUDING REMARKS LITERATURE CITED

 
Alvarez ME, Pennell RI, Meijer PJ, Ishikawa A, Dixon RA, Lamb C (1998) Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell 92: 773–784[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Andreae WA (1955) A sensitive method for the estimation of hydrogen peroxide in biological materials. Nature 175: 859–860[Medline]

Bacic G, Mojovic M (2005) EPR spin trapping of oxygen radicals in plants: a methodological overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 1048: 230–243[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Beckman KB, Ames BN (1997) Oxidative decay of DNA. J Biol Chem 272: 19633–19636[Free Full Text]

Berlett BS, Stadtman ER (1997) Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 272: 20313–20316[Free Full Text]

Bestwick CS, Brown IR, Bennett MH, Mansfield JW (1997) Localization of hydrogen peroxide accumulation during the hypersensitive reaction of lettuce cells to Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola. Plant Cell 9: 209–221[Abstract]

Bialkowski K, Olinski R (1999) Oxidative damage to plant DNA in relation to growth conditions. Acta Biochim Pol 46: 43–49[Web of Science][Medline]

Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV (2003) Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Bot (Lond) 91: 179–194[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blokhina OB, Chirkova TV, Fagerstedt KV (2001) Anoxic stress leads to hydrogen peroxide formation in plant cells. J Exp Bot 52: 1179–1190[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boscolo PR, Menossi M, Jorge RA (2003) Aluminum-induced oxidative stress in maize. Phytochemistry 62: 181–189[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bruskov VI, Malakhova LV, Masalimov ZK, Chernikov AV (2002) Heat-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and 8-oxoguanine, a biomarker of damage to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1354–1363[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buss H, Chan TP, Sluis KB, Domigan NM, Winterbourn CC (1997) Protein carbonyl measurement by a sensitive ELISA method. Free Radic Biol Med 23: 361–366[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Byrdwell WC, Neff WE (2002) Dual parallel electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (MS), MS/MS and MS/MS/MS for the analysis of triacylglycerols and triacylglycerol oxidation products. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16: 300–319[Medline]

Davletova S, Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shengqiang Z, Oliver DJ, Coutu J, Shulaev V, Schlauch K, Mittler R (2005) Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 268–281[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deighton N, Magill WJ, Bremner DH, Benson EE (1997) Malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in plant tissue cultures: LC-MS determination of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives. Free Radic Res 27: 255–265[Web of Science][Medline]

Del RD, Stewart AJ, Pellegrini N (2005) A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 15: 316–328[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dooley CT, Dore TM, Hanson GT, Jackson WC, Remington SJ, Tsien RY (2004) Imaging dynamic redox changes in mammalian cells with green fluorescent protein indicators. J Biol Chem 279: 22284–22293[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Draper HH, Hadley M (1990) Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 186: 421–431[Medline]

Flohe L, Otting F (1984) Superoxide dismutase assays. Methods Enzymol 105: 93–104[Web of Science][Medline]

Foyer CH, Noctor G (2005) Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 17: 1866–1875[Free Full Text]

Fryer MJ, Ball L, Oxborough K, Karpinski S, Mullineaux PM, Baker NR (2003) Control of ascorbate peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J 33: 691–705[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fryer MJ, Oxborough K, Mullineaux PM, Baker NR (2002) Imaging of photo-oxidative stress responses in leaves. J Exp Bot 53: 1249–1254[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garrison WM (1987) Reaction mechanisms in the radiolysis of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. Chem Rev 87: 381–398

Gedik CM, Boyle SP, Wood SG, Vaughan NJ, Collins AR (2002) Oxidative stress in humans: validation of biomarkers of DNA damage. Carcinogenesis 23: 1441–1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17: 994–999[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM (1999) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM, Cross CE (1992) Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now? J Lab Clin Med 119: 598–620[Web of Science][Medline]

Halliwell B, Whiteman M (2004) Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture: how should you do it and what do the results mean? Br J Pharmacol 142: 231–255[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hartley DP, Kolaja KL, Reichard J, Petersen DR (1999) 4-Hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde hepatic protein adducts in rats treated with carbon tetrachloride: immunochemical detection and lobular localization. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 161: 23–33[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207: 604–611[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Jackson SK, Thomas MP, Smith S, Madhani M, Rogers SC, James PE (2004) In vivo EPR spectroscopy: biomedical and potential diagnostic applications. Faraday Discuss 126: 103–117[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jimenez A, Creissen G, Kular B, Firmin J, Robinson S, Verhoeyen M, Mullineaux P (2002) Changes in oxidative processes and components of the antioxidant system during tomato fruit ripening. Planta 214: 751–758[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jimenez A, Hernandez JA, Pastori G, del Rio LA, Sevilla F (1998) Role of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle of mitochondria and peroxisomes in the senescence of pea leaves. Plant Physiol 118: 1327–1335[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Job C, Rajjou L, Lovigny Y, Belghazi M, Job D (2005) Patterns of protein oxidation in Arabidopsis seeds and during germination. Plant Physiol 138: 790–802[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johansson E, Olsson O, Nystrom T (2004) Progression and specificity of protein oxidation in the life cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 279: 22204–22208[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Keller RJ, Halmes NC, Hinson JA, Pumford NR (1993) Immunochemical detection of oxidized proteins. Chem Res Toxicol 6: 430–433[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Khan N, Swartz H (2002) Measurements in vivo of parameters pertinent to ROS/RNS using EPR spectroscopy. Mol Cell Biochem 234-235: 341–357[CrossRef]

Khan N, Wilmot CM, Rosen GM, Demidenko E, Sun J, Joseph J, O'Hara J, Kalyanaraman B, Swartz HM (2003) Spin traps: in vitro toxicity and stability of radical adducts. Free Radic Biol Med 34: 1473–1481[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kristensen BK, Askerlund P, Bykova NV, Egsgaard H, Moller IM (2004) Identification of oxidised proteins in the matrix of rice leaf mitochondria by immunoprecipitation and two-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 65: 1839–1851[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Landry LG, Chapple CC, Last RL (1995) Arabidopsis mutants lacking phenolic sunscreens exhibit enhanced ultraviolet-B injury and oxidative damage. Plant Physiol 109: 1159–1166[Abstract]

Levine RL, Williams JA, Stadtman ER, Shacter E (1994) Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol 233: 346–357[Web of Science][Medline]

Liu J, Yeo HC, Doniger SJ, Ames BN (1997) Assay of aldehydes from lipid peroxidation: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry compared to thiobarbituric acid. Anal Biochem 245: 161–166[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mahan JR, Mauget SA (2005) Antioxidant metabolism in cotton seedlings exposed to temperature stress in the field. Crop Sci 45: 2337–2345[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muckenschnabel I, Goodman BA, Williamson B, Lyon GD, Deighton N (2002) Infection of leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana by Botrytis cinerea: changes in ascorbic acid, free radicals and lipid peroxidation products. J Exp Bot 53: 207–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muckenschnabel I, Williamson B, Goodman BA, Lyon GD, Stewart D, Deighton N (2001) Markers for oxidative stress associated with soft rots in French beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) infected by Botrytis cinerea. Planta 212: 376–381[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Murphy TM, Vu H, Nguyen T (1998) The superoxide synthases of rose cells. Comparison of assays. Plant Physiol 117: 1301–1305[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Orozco-Cardenas M, Ryan CA (1999) Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 6553–6557[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Orozco-Cárdenas ML, Ryan CA (2002) Nitric oxide negatively modulates wound signaling in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 130: 487–493[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Prasad TK (1996) Mechanisms of chilling-induced oxidative stress injury and tolerance in developing maize seedlings: changes in antioxidant system, oxidation of proteins and lipids, and protease activities. Plant J 10: 1017–1026[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rizhsky L, Davletova S, Liang H, Mittler R (2004) The zinc finger protein Zat12 is required for cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 expression during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 279: 11736–11743[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roxas VP, Lodhi SA, Garrett DK, Mahan JR, Allen RD (2000) Stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco seedlings that overexpress glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol 41: 1229–1234[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schopfer P, Plachy C, Frahry G (2001) Release of reactive oxygen intermediates (superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals) and peroxidase in germinating radish seeds controlled by light, gibberellin, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 125: 1591–1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shacter E, Williams JA, Lim M, Levine RL (1994) Differential susceptibility of plasma proteins to oxidative modification: examination by western blot immunoassay. Free Radic Biol Med 17: 429–437[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Shi S, Wang G, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhang L (2005) Protective effect of nitric oxide against oxidative stress under ultraviolet-B radiation. Nitric Oxide 13: 1–9[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Smith MA, Sayre LM, Anderson VE, Harris PLR, Beal MF, Kowall N, Perry G (1998) Cytochemical demonstration of oxidative damage in Alzheimer disease by immunochemical enhancement of the carbonyl reaction with 2,4-DNPH. J Histochem Cytochem 46: 731–735[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stadtman ER, Oliver CN (1991) Metal-catalyzed oxidation of proteins. J Biol Chem 266: 2005–2008[Free Full Text]

Tarpey MM, Wink DA, Grisham MB (2004) Methods for detection of reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen: in vitro and in vivo considerations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R431–R444[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H₂O₂ in plants: H₂O₂ accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 11: 1187–1194[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Utsumi H, Yamada K (2003) In vivo electron spin resonance-computed tomography/nitroxyl probe technique for non-invasive analysis of oxidative injuries. Arch Biochem Biophys 416: 1–8[CrossRef][Medline]

Utsumi H, Yamada K, Ichikawa K, Sakai K, Kinoshita Y, Matsumoto S, Nagai M (2006) Simultaneous molecular imaging of redox reactions monitored by Overhauser-enhanced MRI with 14N- and 15N-labeled nitroxyl radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1463–1468[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Delaplace, M.-L. Fauconnier, K. Sergeant, J.-F. Dierick, M. Oufir, F. van der Wal, A. H. P. America, J. Renaut, J.-F. Hausman, and P. du Jardin Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber ageing induces changes in the proteome and antioxidants associated with the sprouting pattern J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1273 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lin and D. J. Oliver The Role of Acetyl-Coenzyme A Synthetase in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1822 - 1829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Queval, J. Hager, B. Gakiere, and G. Noctor Why are literature data for H2O2 contents so variable? A discussion of potential difficulties in the quantitative assay of leaf extracts J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2008; 59(2): 135 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Garmier, P. Priault, G. Vidal, S. Driscoll, R. Djebbar, M. Boccara, C. Mathieu, C. H. Foyer, and R. De Paepe Light and Oxygen Are Not Required for Harpin-induced Cell Death J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37556 - 37566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Agricola Articles by Shulaev, V. Articles by Oliver, D. J. Related Collections Reactive Oxygen Species