This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 141/2/446    most recent pp.106.077982v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Agricola Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Related Collections Reactive Oxygen Species

Maturation of Arabidopsis Seeds Is Dependent on Glutathione Biosynthesis within the Embryo^1,[C]

Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia (N.G.C., C.S.C.); and Heidelberg Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Heidelberg, D–69120 Heidelberg, Germany (M.P., A.W., A.J.M.)

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Glutathione (GSH) has been implicated in maintaining the cell cycle within plant meristems and protecting proteins during seed dehydration. To assess the role of GSH during development of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh.) embryos, we characterized T-DNA insertion mutants of GSH1, encoding the first enzyme of GSH biosynthesis, -glutamyl-cysteine synthetase. These gsh1 mutants confer a recessive embryo-lethal phenotype, in contrast to the previously described GSH1 mutant, root meristemless 1(rml1), which is able to germinate, but is deficient in postembryonic root development. Homozygous mutant embryos show normal morphogenesis until the seed maturation stage. The only visible phenotype in comparison to wild type was progressive bleaching of the mutant embryos from the torpedo stage onward. Confocal imaging of GSH in isolated mutant and wild-type embryos after fluorescent labeling with monochlorobimane detected residual amounts of GSH in rml1 embryos. In contrast, gsh1 T-DNA insertion mutant embryos could not be labeled with monochlorobimane from the torpedo stage onward, indicating the absence of GSH. By using high-performance liquid chromatography, however, GSH was detected in extracts of mutant ovules and imaging of intact ovules revealed a high concentration of GSH in the funiculus, within the phloem unloading zone, and in the outer integument. The observation of high GSH in the funiculus is consistent with a high GSH1-promoter::-glucuronidase reporter activity in this tissue. Development of mutant embryos could be partially rescued by exogenous GSH in vitro. These data show that at least a small amount of GSH synthesized autonomously within the developing embryo is essential for embryo development and proper seed maturation.

Oxidation-reduction status is an important regulator of various metabolic functions in all eukaryotic cells. Perturbation of the finely balanced cellular redox system by biotic and abiotic stresses results in molecular responses ultimately leading to alterations in cell function and adaptation. The glutathione system (reduced, GSH; oxidized, GSSG) acts as a homoeostatic redox buffer that contributes to maintenance of the cellular redox balance (Schafer and Buettner, 2001; Meyer and Hell, 2005) and it may also act as a redox sensor of environmental cues (May et al., 1998). Thus, glutathione may form part of a complex regulatory network underlying adaptation processes and coordinating gene expression and cell division. Beyond stress perception and signaling processes, glutathione is involved in a wide range of different metabolic functions, ranging from detoxification of heavy metals (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002) and conjugation of electrophilic xenobiotics (Marrs, 1996) to reductive processes, such as scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Noctor and Foyer, 1998). Furthermore, GSH is required as a cofactor for several other metabolic processes, including the detoxification of methylglyoxal, a cytotoxic compound that is formed as a by-product of glycolysis under stress conditions (Zang et al., 2001; Singla-Pareek et al., 2003) and the reduction of adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate as the first reductive step of sulfate assimilation (Bick et al., 1998; Prior et al., 1999; Weber et al., 2000).

Glutathione biosynthesis takes place in two consecutive steps catalyzed by -glutamyl-cysteine synthetase (-ECS or GSH1) and glutathione synthetase (GSH2), respectively. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh.), both enzymes are encoded by single-copy genes (May et al., 1998). GSH1 is located in plastids, whereas GSH2 is targeted to both cytosol and plastids (Wachter et al., 2005). Several mutants of GSH1 have been described, including the Cd²⁺-sensitive cad2-1 (Howden et al., 1995) and regulator of ascorbate peroxidase1-1 (rax1-1; Ball et al., 2004), which both have only about 30% wild-type levels of GSH and display distinct defense gene expression profiles. More severe is the root meristemless1 (rml1) mutant of GSH1, which lacks postembryonic cell division due to a severe deficiency of GSH (Cheng et al., 1995; Vernoux et al., 2000). Antisense suppression of GSH1 resulted, in the most extreme case, in smaller plants with significantly increased sensitivity to environmental stresses (Xiang et al., 2001).

In nonstressed cells, GSH is present in millimolar concentrations with the highest concentrations of 2 to 4 mM in meristematic cells of the Arabidopsis root tip and cells from the logarithmic phase of a suspension culture (Fricker et al., 2000; Meyer et al., 2001). The increased concentrations of glutathione in dividing cells support the hypothesis of specific functions of GSH during meristematic growth (Sánchez-Fernández et al., 1997; Vernoux et al., 2000). A significant function for GSH is in scavenging ROS and as a redox buffer (Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Meyer and Hell, 2005). Several different ROS are generally produced as by-products during normal aerobic metabolism (Apel and Hirt, 2004). Detoxification of ROS is mainly achieved through the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Foyer and Noctor, 2000) and also through the glutathione peroxide cycle by which hydrogen peroxide is reduced to water by glutathione peroxidase (Roxas et al., 1997; Mullineaux et al., 1998).

Developing seeds are an important sink for sulfur in either oxidized or reduced form. Thus, sulfur nutrition of maternal plants may directly affect the delivery and metabolism of sulfur in, for example, the developing endosperms of wheat (Triticum aestivum; Fitzgerald et al., 2001). The demand of developing seeds for sulfur can potentially be satisfied either through supply of sulfate or, alternatively, in the form of reduced phloem-mobile sulfur compounds. Potential transport metabolites for reduced sulfur are GSH (Rennenberg, 1982; Herschbach et al., 2000) and S-methylmethionine (Bourgis et al., 1999). It has been proposed that glutathione translocated from shoot to root via the phloem acts as a signal responsible for repression of sulfate uptake in the roots (Lappartient and Touraine, 1997; Lappartient et al., 1999). Artificial inhibition of GSH biosynthesis in maize (Zea mays) by L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GSH1, however, provided evidence for Cys rather than GSH as repressor signal for expression of sulfur status-responsive genes (Bolchi et al., 1999). Whereas sulfate is the major form of soluble sulfur in the endosperm of high-sulfur wheat plants, low-sulfur plants contained predominantly GSH (Fitzgerald et al., 2001). The interpretation that seeds can be supplied with reduced sulfur in the form of GSH is supported by the observation of high GSH concentrations in rice (Oryza sativa) phloem (Kuzuhara et al., 2000). Awazuhara et al. (2002) showed that feeding of GSH, but not the precursor Cys, to immature cotyledons affected storage protein accumulation. Thus, these results suggest a key role of GSH as a transport metabolite for reduced sulfur to the seed. In wheat endosperm, GSH is metabolized to the single amino acids required for synthesis of storage proteins (Anderson and Fitzgerald, 2001; Fitzgerald et al., 2001). Whereas seeds of legumes and cereals contain vascular tissue, the only vascular bundle in Arabidopsis seed is the bundle that terminates at the end of the funiculus. Using a noninvasive approach based on phloem-mobile green fluorescent protein and other fluorescent tracers, it was recently shown that within Arabidopsis seed several isolated symplastic domains with three apoplastic borders between the phloem and the embryo can be distinguished (Stadler et al., 2005). Transport of GSH into the developing embryo would thus require efficient transport systems, and it has been suggested that members of the oligopeptide transporter family might be involved in GSH transport (Cagnac et al., 2004).

The observation that homozygous rml1 seedlings develop normally through seed maturation leaves open the question of whether the rml1 embryo produces sufficient residual amounts of GSH or whether GSH required during embryogenesis might be supplied by maternal tissues. Approaches to analyze the glutathione status in seeds so far have used conventional tissue extraction and subsequent HPLC analysis (Fitzgerald et al., 2001; Hagan et al., 2003). This approach, however, has the disadvantage that uneven distribution of GSH between different seed tissues is difficult to analyze, especially in small seeds such as in Arabidopsis. GSH levels in different adjacent cells can be visualized and quantified by GSH-specific fluorescent labeling with monochlorobimane (MCB) and confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM; Fricker et al., 2000; Gutiérrez-Alcalá et al., 2000; Meyer and Fricker, 2000; Meyer et al., 2001; Hartmann et al., 2003). To investigate whether developing Arabidopsis embryos are fully autonomous in their GSH metabolism or whether the embryos can be supplied with GSH from maternal tissues during their development, we have isolated Arabidopsis loss-of-function alleles of GSH1 from T-DNA mutant collections and studied the development of homozygous embryos in these mutants in comparison to homozygous rml1 embryos and wild-type embryos. The presence of GSH in the different embryos and the distribution of GSH within developing ovules were observed in situ by CLSM after MCB labeling.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 

The rml1 Mutant Has Residual GSH Detectable in Situ Using MCB

The rml1 mutation results in a single amino acid substitution in GSH1, which renders the homozygous seedling almost entirely GSH deficient. The lack of GSH prevents normal meristematic growth of mutant seedlings and normal root hair formation (Fig. 1, A, B, and E ). Vernoux et al. (2000) reported that, using an HPLC assay, a residual level of GSH (2.7% of wild type) could be detected in rml1. We have used MCB in combination with CLSM to detect GSH in rml1 mutants in situ and imaging confirmed a small amount of MCB-dependent fluorescence. In different experiments, rml1 seedlings were shown to contain about 2% to 10% of GSH compared with wild-type seedlings (Fig. 1, C–G). Simultaneous labeling of cell walls with 50 µM propidium iodide (PI) indicated that cells of both wild-type and mutant seedlings were intact and viable. When rml1 seedlings were germinated in the presence of 1 mM L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GSH biosynthesis, no MCB-dependent fluorescence was detected (data not shown), suggesting that the observed GSH in the mutant seedlings is due to autonomous GSH biosynthesis from residual GSH1 activity. Because embryonic development and seed maturation appear to occur normally in the rml1 mutant, we wished to determine whether this was dependent on a level of endogenous GSH biosynthesis. To test this, we have characterized T-DNA insertion alleles of GSH1.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. In situ imaging of GSH using the MCB reagent in the rml1 GSH-deficient mutant. A, Wild-type seedling (scale bar = 5 mm). B, Homozygous rml1 seedling (scale bar = 1 mm) 10 d after germination. C to G, In situ labeling of root tips of wild-type and mutant seedlings with 100 µM MCB (green) and 50 µM PI (red) for 30 min. C, Maximal projection of an intact wild-type root tip (scale bar = 50 µm). D, Median optical section of a labeled wild-type root (scale bar = 20 µm). E, Maximal projection of an intact rml1 root tip (scale bar = 20 µm). F, Median optical section of a labeled rml1 root imaged under the same conditions used for the wild-type root tip shown in D (scale bar = 20 µm). G, The same median optical section of a labeled rml1 root as in F, imaged with increased detection sensitivity to visualize residual amounts of GSH (scale bar = 20 µm). Intensity bars for estimation of GSB concentrations in D, F, and G give GSB concentrations in millimolars.

Three different lines with T-DNA insertions in GSH1 were obtained from the SIGnAL collection available through the Arabidopsis stock center. These mutants are referred to here as gsh1-T1, -T2, and -T3 (Table I ; Fig. 2A ). The sequence of DNA spanning the T-DNA left border in each mutant was determined to confirm the position of insertion (Fig. 2A). Among the seed of self-fertilized heterozygous individuals for each mutant, approximately 25% failed to germinate and, of those that did, no homozygous gsh1 mutant individuals were detected. Ratios of 2:1 heterozygous-homozygous wild-type individuals were observed (Table I). This suggested that gsh1 insertion mutations conferred an embryo-lethal phenotype. Siliques of heterozygous individuals contained approximately 25% developing embryos that were white in color rather than green (Fig. 2B). For gsh1-T1, the green-to-white ratio observed was 1,858:591 (² = 0.98; P > 0.3).

View larger version (52K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Characterization of T-DNA insertion alleles of Arabidopsis GSH1. A, GSH1 gene structure and location of three independent T-DNA insertions in GSH1. B, Opened silique from self-fertilized gsh1-T1/+ heterozygote showing 25% embryos with lethal phenotype. C, Wild-type control. Scale bars in B and C = 1 mm.

GSH Partially Rescues the Phenotype of Mutant Embryos

Root growth of rml1 mutants can be rescued by germinating seeds on agar medium containing GSH (Vernoux et al., 2000). To test whether gsh1-T1 mutants could be similarly rescued, white and green embryos were removed from siliques 8 to 10 d postfertilization and placed on agar medium with or without 1 mM GSH. In different experiments, 20% to 50% of green embryos developed into seedlings on both media. Similarly, 20% to 50% of white embryos developed on media containing GSH, but none developed in the absence of GSH (Fig. 3 ). Those that developed in the presence of GSH were confirmed by PCR to be homozygous mutants and, although they grew roots and leaves in the presence of exogenous GSH, they became progressively chlorotic and died (Fig. 3D).

View larger version (109K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Partial rescue of gsh1-T1 homozygous plants by GSH. Green (A and B) and white (C and D) embryos collected from siliques of a heterozygous gsh1-T1/+ plant were plated onto either nutrient medium (A and C) or nutrient medium containing 1 mM GSH (B and D) and allowed to grow for a further 24 d.

GSH1 T-DNA Insertion Alleles Are Lethal at a Late Stage in Embryo Development

Knockout embryos started their normal developmental program and became green at the same time as wild-type embryos during the heart stage approximately 4 d after pollination. Because the initiation of the greening process is restricted to the outermost cells of the heart-stage embryos, greening was best observed by the chlorophyll autofluorescence of isolated embryos. From the torpedo stage onward, all embryos could be identified as green without isolation from the ovules. Shortly after the torpedo stage, the mutant embryos started bleaching (Fig. 2; Table II ). Growth of the mutant embryos continued at the same rate compared to wild-type embryos from the same siliques (Table II).

Low-M_r thiols were assayed in extracts of green wild-type and white homozygous gsh1-T1 ovules identified after the mutant phenotype was clearly visible. The mutant ovules contained about 60 nmol g^–1 fresh weight (FW) GSH compared with 380 nmol g^–1 FW in wild-type ovules collected at the same stage (Fig. 4 ). The level of Cys was higher in mutant ovules: 105 nmol g^–1 FW compared to 80 nmol g^–1 FW in the wild type (Fig. 4). Two other possible intermediates of GSH degradation, Cys-Gly and -EC, which is also the immediate product of the enzyme GSH1 deleted in the mutant embryos, were slightly decreased in the mutant.

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Low-Mr thiols in developing wild-type and gsh1-T1 mutant seeds. Ovules were harvested 9 to 13 d after self pollination when homozygous gsh1-T1 mutants could easily be identified by their white color. Black bars = ecotype Columbia; white bars = homozygous gsh1-T1. Values are mean ± SD; n = 3.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. GSH imaging in intact ovules and isolated embryos. Ovules and isolated embryos were incubated in 100 µM MCB for 30 min prior to imaging. A, Superimposed transmission image (gray) and fluorescence image (green) of an ovule of a wild-type plant. The globular-stage embryo is fluorescently labeled (arrowhead). B, Ovule from a heterozygous rml1 plant after self pollination. The superimposed transmission image (gray) and fluorescence image (green) indicate the absence of GSH labeling in the globular-stage embryo (arrowhead). The presented image is representative for about 25% of the ovules in siliques of a rml1/+ heterozygote plant. C to H, Isolated embryos of wild type (C and D), rml1 (E and F), and gsh1-T1 (G and H) labeled with 100 µM MCB for GSH (green) and 50 µM PI for cell walls and viability of the cells (red). Images C, E, and G show merged green and red signals, including red autofluorescence from chloroplasts. Images D, F, and H show only the green signal for GSH labeled with MCB. The labeling pattern depicted for the rml1 and gsh1-T1 embryos is representative for 25% of the embryos of the respective self-pollinated heterozygous lines. All other embryos of these lines label like wild-type embryos. Scale bars in A and B = 50 µm; scale bars in C to H = 100 µm.

The apparent contradiction between the HPLC data showing the presence of GSH in white gsh1-T ovules and the lack of MCB labeling in the mutant embryos is consistent with the import of GSH into the growing seed from maternal tissues. Labeling of intact ovules still attached to the false septum of the opened siliques resulted in intense labeling of the funiculi (Fig. 6, A and B ). Within the intact ovules, the chalazal point at which the funiculus is attached gave a particularly strong MCB-dependent fluorescent signal with concentrations of glutathione-bimane (GSB) conjugate up to 5 mM (Fig. 6, C and D). Strong fluorescence was also observed in all cells of the outer integument, but this was always less than that observed at the chalazal point. Only weak labeling with MCB was observed in cells of the inner integument, and very little or no labeling in the endosperm, whereas the developing embryo was again clearly labeled (Fig. 6D). Histochemical localization of GSH1 promoter activity in wild-type plants transformed with a GSH1 promoter::-glucuronidase (GUS) construct indicated strong activity in the embryo (Fig. 6F) and a particularly high activity in the funiculus (Fig. 6E), consistent with the levels of GSH observed.

View larger version (70K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. In situ labeling of GSH in intact ovules. Siliques were opened without detaching the ovules from the false septum of the ovary and then placed in 100 µM MCB for 30 min. A, Superimposed transmission image (gray) and fluorescence image (green) of an opened silique with several attached ovules, all of which show strong fluorescence (scale bar = 500 µm). B, Detail of a single ovule (scale bar = 20 µm). C, Transmission image of an ovule with a globular-stage embryo (arrowhead; scale bar = 100 µm). D, Optical section through the ovule shown in C after labeling with 100 µM MCB and 50 µM PI (scale bar = 100 µm). E and F, Histochemical assay for detection of GUS activity in siliques (E) and embryos (F) of Arabidopsis plants expressing an AtGSH1-promoter::GUS fusion (scale bars = 250 µm).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

The rml1 mutant exhibits its characteristic phenotype only after germination (Vernoux et al., 2000), and comparison with the embryo-lethal phenotypes of the gsh1 T-DNA insertion lines is consistent with the rml1 mutant having some residual GSH1 activity. High-resolution imaging showed the presence of residual amounts of GSH in rml1 embryos and in the primary root of rml1 seedlings. MCB has been reported to nonspecifically label thiols in situ in the absence of a specific glutathione S-transferase capable of catalyzing the conjugation reaction with GSH (van der Ven et al., 1994). In this study, however, the absence of a detectable MCB-dependent fluorescence signal in homozygous gsh1-T embryos demonstrates that almost all the MCB-dependent fluorescence signal arises from conjugation with GSH, with no other low-M_r thiols or protein thiols labeled to a detectable level under the conditions used. This is consistent with earlier observations that MCB can be used for long-term incubation of suspension culture cells without apparent toxic effects on normal metabolism that would be caused by nonspecific labeling of protein thiols or low-M_r thiols other than GSH (Meyer and Fricker, 2002).

The embryo-lethal phenotype indicates that the embryo is not supplied with GSH from maternal tissues sufficiently to support full seed maturation. Developing seeds require a large amount of reduced sulfur for synthesis of structural and metabolic proteins. Sulfur assimilation from inorganic sulfate predominantly takes place within chloroplasts utilizing the reducing power generated through photosynthesis (Leustek et al., 2000). Grain tissues have the capacity to assimilate sulfate (Fitzgerald et al., 2001) and, from activities of enzymes involved in sulfate assimilation, Tabe and Droux (2001) calculated that sulfur assimilation within developing lupin cotyledons could contribute significantly to the accumulation of organic sulfur reserves in the seed. High activity of ATP sulfurylase in developing soybean (Glycine max) seeds indicates that the seeds, rather than the pods, are the dominant site of sulfate reduction (Sexton and Shibles, 1999). Similarly, high expression of adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase was found in developing siliques (A.J. Meyer and S. Kopriva, unpublished data).

Transport of GSH has been reported for grains of wheat grown under conditions of low sulfur nutrition. Within the seeds, the delivered GSH is rapidly catabolized to provide free Cys required for synthesis of storage proteins (Fitzgerald et al., 2001). Rapid catabolism of supplied GSH could thus explain the lack of MCB labeling of the endosperm even in wild-type seeds. Degradation of GSH involves -glutamyl transpeptidases, which cleave the amino-terminal bond between Glu and Cys (Martin, 2003). Similar to extracellular degradation of GSH in animal tissues, an Arabidopsis -glutamyl transpeptidase, which is catalytically active on the apoplastic side of the plasma membrane, has been identified (Storozhenko et al., 2002). Degradation of GSH within the endosperm cavity has been reported for wheat (Fitzgerald et al., 2001). Alternatively, the absence of bimane labeling in the endosperm might be due to lack of a suitable glutathione S-transferase capable of catalyzing the conjugation with GSH. In Arabidopsis, the endosperm develops first as a syncytium and then cellularizes after the growing embryo reaches the heart stage (Berger, 2003). During the syncytical phase, the endosperm is lacking vacuoles and thus it may be that the GSH-dependent detoxification pathway, which ultimately leads to vacuolar sequestration of the GSH conjugates, is not highly expressed in the early endosperm. However, absence of intense bimane labeling during later cellular phases of the endosperm would favor the hypothesis that GSH is catabolized.

The importance of GSH for embryo development is further corroborated by the observation that T-DNA insertion mutations of the plastidic (and mitochondrial) glutathione reductase (At3g54660) are also embryo lethal (A.J. Meyer, unpublished data; Tzafrir et al., 2004). That these mutations cause termination of development at the earlier globular stage, emphasizes the importance of glutathione metabolism and redox homeostasis for embryo development. The early lethal effect of a plastidic glutathione reductase mutation may suggest that gsh1-T mutant embryos receive sufficient GSH from maternal tissues in the earlier stages of development to provide catalytic amounts of GSH within the plastids or mitochondria. This would then also imply an efficient uptake of GSH into the chloroplasts at extremely low cytosolic concentrations of GSH. So far, high-affinity transport of GSH into plastids has only been shown for isolated wheat plastids with a K_m of 30 to 50 µM (Noctor et al., 2002). The general possibility of GSH transport into the embryo and further transport into organelles is supported by the fact that mutant GSH-deficient embryos could be rescued with an external supply of 1 mM GSH. However, uptake of GSH from external medium is still by no means sufficient to enable knockout mutants to complete their life cycle.

The direct cause of embryo lethality arising from GSH deficiency is not apparent. The GSH-deficient embryos begin to bleach shortly after chlorophyll biosynthesis begins, suggesting either a block in further chlorophyll synthesis or artificial destruction of chlorophyll. Destruction of chlorophyll can occur under high light intensity due to photooxidative stress. The loss of chlorophyll during embryogenesis, however, cannot account for the lethal effect. Cell divisions proceed apparently without any significant aberrations and the mutant embryos reach their full size. This phenotype is different from mutants with aberrant plastid development like schlepperless, which shows retarded growth (Apuya et al., 2001). In contrast, albino mutants, which lack the ability to produce pigments, remain morphologically normal and are able to germinate (Budziszewski et al., 2001). Labeling of mutant embryos with PI confirmed that shortly before onset of desiccation the cells of the embryo were still viable. Thus, the embryo-lethal effect of GSH deficiency became manifested at a very late stage in development, most likely the desiccation stage.

During seed development, increased levels of ROS occur and are normally controlled by increased levels of antioxidant compounds and activity of ROS scavenging enzymes (Bailly, 2004). Uncontrolled ROS production due to tocopherol deficiency can lead to oxidative stress and cellular damage, resulting in decreased seed longevity (Sattler et al., 2004). A typical result of increased ROS formation is protein carbonylation, leading to alteration of activity and increased likelihood of proteolytic attack (Johansson et al., 2004). Protein carbonylation can occur during germination of Arabidopsis seed and might be required for counteracting and utilizing the production of ROS resulting from the recovery of metabolic activity in germinating seeds (Job et al., 2005). GSH is directly involved in the ability of resurrection plants to dehydrate and recover after rewatering (Kranner et al., 2002). Glutathione has also been suggested to be directly involved in seed desiccation not only as a ROS scavenger, but also as a protective agent for protein thiols through protein glutathionylation (Kranner et al., 2002). The molecular basis for the essential role of GSH during seed maturation is not understood yet and is the subject of future work.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the essential need for autonomous biosynthesis of glutathione within the embryo for normal development of the embryo and especially maturation of the seed. Glutathione is apparently transported to seeds, but does not reach the embryo in sufficient quantities to enable normal embryo maturation and formation of viable seeds capable of germination. It is not yet clear whether the GSH is metabolized within the endosperm or after delivery to the seed and whether the resulting amino acids can be taken up by the embryo.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 

Plant Material

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh.) ecotype Columbia was used as wild type. Three different T-DNA insertion lines for AtGSH1 (SALK_011665 = gsh1-T1; SALK_081530 = gsh1-T2; SALK_102540 = gsh1-T3) were provided by the Salk Institute (Alonso et al., 2003) and obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. Plants were grown in soil in a controlled growth room with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle, 150 µmol m^–2 s^–1 photons, 21°C, and 50% humidity. For growth of seedlings, seeds were surface sterilized with 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min, washed twice with sterile water, and placed on full nutrient medium solidified with 1% phytagel (Meyer and Fricker, 2000). Seedlings were grown under short-day conditions (8.5-h light, 22°C/15.5-h dark, 18°C) and 120 µmol photons m^–2 s^–1. Developing embryos were isolated from ovules by microdissection of the ovules under a stereomicroscope.

Screening for T-DNA Knockout Lines and Identification of Insertion Sites

To determine the position of each T-DNA insert, a DNA fragment was amplified by PCR using primers specific for the T-DNA left border and a flanking GSH1 sequence and the nucleotide sequence of the resulting products was determined. To determine the genotype of plants for a T-DNA insertion mutation, PCR using GSH1-specific primers that flanked the insertion point was used to identify the presence of a wild-type allele, whereas a GSH1-specific primer in combination with a T-DNA left-border primer was used to identify the mutant allele.

HPLC Analysis of Low-M_r Thiols

Siliques from wild-type and heterozygous gsh1-T1 plants were harvested 9 to 13 d after self fertilization and opened under a dissecting microscope. From gsh1-T1 plants, only white ovules were collected for further analysis. Three to 4 mg of fresh material were extracted in 0.1 N HCl, fully reduced with dithiothreitol for 1 h, and derivatized with 30 mM monobromobimane (THIOLYTE; Calbiochem) for 15 min in the dark. Derivatization was stopped by acidification with 5% (v/v) acetic acid. Samples were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC (Waters 600E multisolvent delivery system, Autosampler 717plus; Waters) on a C-18 column (Nova-Pak 4.6 x 250 mm; pore size 4 µm). Separated fluorescent thiol-bimane conjugates were detected with 380-nm excitation at an emission wavelength of 480 nm on an attached fluorescence detector (Fluorometer RF-551; Shimadzu). Samples were separated with a mixture of 91% 100 mM potassium acetate, pH 5.5, and 9% methanol for 12.5 min and a flow rate of 1.3 mL min^–1. Data acquisition and processing were performed by Millenium³² software (Waters).

Fluorescent Dyes

Stock solutions of 100 mM MCB were prepared with dimethyl sulfoxide and PI was prepared as a 5 mM aqueous stock. All stock solutions were stored as 100-µL aliquots at –20°C. Aliquots were thawed immediately prior to use and diluted with basal nutrient medium to final concentrations of 100 µM MCB and 50 µM PI. All dyes were obtained from Molecular Probes.

GSH Imaging

Seedlings and isolated embryos were transferred to a drop of dye solution on a slide separated from a coverslip by using 120-µm-thick plastic tape as a spacer. Serial optical sections were obtained by a Zeiss LSM 510 META attached to an inverted microscope stand (Axiovert 200 M; Zeiss) using either a Zeiss 10x Plan-Neofluar, a Zeiss 25x Plan-Neofluar 0.8 NA with water immersion, or a Zeiss 63x C-Apochromat 1.2 NA water immersion lens, as appropriate. Fluorescence was excited by a 405-nm diode laser for GSB and by a 543-nm HeNe laser for PI in a single track using a HFT 405/488/543 as the main dichroic beamsplitter and a NFT 545 as the secondary dichroic beam splitter. Bimane-dependent fluorescence was recorded on channel 2, with a selected bandwidth of 475 to 525 nm. The PI signal was monitored together with red autofluorescence from chloroplasts on channel 3 with a 560-nm long pass emission filter. Scanning was conducted in line mode and images were displayed as the mean of four subsequent scans. Besides the confocal images, a transmission image was normally recorded simultaneously.

Image analysis and processing was done in LSM3.2 (Zeiss) and Image J (version 1.33g; Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health). Final processing and compiling of images was done in Adobe Photoshop 7.0.

Analysis of AtGSH1 Promoter Activity

For analysis of AtGSH1 promoter activity, a 1,606-bp fragment in front of the start codon was amplified by PCR with primers 5'-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTATCGATATGTAACACAATAAT-3' and 5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTGGTATATATAGCTCCTGCA-3'. By use of a Gateway recombination system, the promoter sequence was cloned into vector pKGWFS7 in front of the reporter genes EGFP and uidA. Arabidopsis plants were transformed by the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) and 10 independent transformant lines were used for further analysis. For detection of GUS activity, tissue samples were treated with GUS staining buffer (100 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄, pH 7.0, 10 mM Na₂EDTA, 0.5 mM K₃[Fe(CN)₆], 0.5 mM K₄[Fe(CN)₆], and 0.08% [w/v] X-GlucA [Duchefa]) for 16 h at 37°C. Green tissues were bleached with ethanol before examination.

Received January 27, 2006; returned for revision February 21, 2006; accepted February 22, 2006.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. ME 1567/3–2 to A.J.M.), the University of Heidelberg (to A.J.M.), and the University of Melbourne (to C.S.C.).

² Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Andreas J. Meyer (ameyer{at}hip.uni-hd.de).

^[C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.077982.

^* Corresponding author; e-mail ameyer{at}hip.uni-hd.de; fax 49–6221–545859.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anderson JW, Fitzgerald MA (2001) Physiological and metabolic origin of sulphur for the synthesis of seed storage proteins. J Plant Physiol 158: 447–456[CrossRef]

Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 373–399[CrossRef][Medline]

Apuya NR, Yadegari R, Fischer RL, Harada JJ, Zimmerman JL, Goldberg RB (2001) The Arabidopsis embryo mutant schlepperless has a defect in the chaperonin-60 gene. Plant Physiol 126: 717–730[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Awazuhara M, Kim H, Hayashi H, Chino M, Kim S-G, Fujiwara T (2002) Composition of seed storage proteins changed by glutathione treatment of soybeans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66: 1751–1754[Medline]

Bailly C (2004) Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Sci Res 14: 93–107[CrossRef]

Ball L, Accotto GP, Bechtold U, Creissen G, Funck D, Jimenez A, Kular B, Leyland N, Mejia-Carranza J, Reynolds H, et al (2004) Evidence for a direct link between glutathione biosynthesis and stress defense gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16: 2448–2462[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berger F (2003) Endosperm: the crossroad of seed development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 42–50[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bick JA, Aslund F, Chen Y, Leustek T (1998) Glutaredoxin function for the carboxyl-terminal domain of the plant-type 5'-adenylylsulfate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 8404–8409[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bolchi A, Petrucco S, Tenca PL, Foroni C, Ottonello S (1999) Coordinate modulation of maize sulfate permease and ATP sulfurylase mRNAs in response to variations in sulfur nutritional status: stereospecific down-regulation by L-cysteine. Plant Mol Biol 39: 527–537[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bourgis F, Roje S, Nuccio ML, Fisher DB, Tarczynski MC, Li C, Herschbach C, Rennenberg H, Pimenta MJ, Shen TL, et al (1999) S-methylmethionine plays a major role in phloem sulfur transport and is synthesized by a novel type of methyltransferase. Plant Cell 11: 1485–1498[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Budziszewski GJ, Lewis SP, Glover LW, Reineke J, Jones G, Ziemnik LS, Lonowski J, Nyfeler B, Aux G, Zhou Q, et al (2001) Arabidopsis genes essential for seedling viability: isolation of insertional mutants and molecular cloning. Genetics 159: 1765–1778[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cagnac O, Bourbouloux A, Chakrabarty D, Zhang M-Y, Delrot S (2004) AtOPT6 transports glutathione derivatives and is induced by primisulfuron. Plant Physiol 135: 1378–1387[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheng JC, Seeley KA, Sung ZR (1995) RML1 and RML2, Arabidopsis genes required for cell proliferation at the root tip. Plant Physiol 107: 365–376[Abstract]

Clough S, Bent A (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–743[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cobbett C, Goldsbrough P (2002) Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53: 159–182[CrossRef][Medline]

Fitzgerald MA, Ugalde TD, Anderson JW (2001) Sulphur nutrition affects delivery and metabolism of S in developing endosperms of wheat. J Exp Bot 52: 1519–1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foyer CH, Noctor G (2000) Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytol 146: 359–388[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Fricker MD, May M, Meyer AJ, Sheard N, White NS (2000) Measurement of glutathione levels in intact roots of Arabidopsis. J Microsc (Oxf) 198: 162–173

Goldberg R, Barker S, Perez-Grau L (1989) Regulation of gene expression during plant embryogenesis. Cell 56: 149–160[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gutiérrez-Alcalá G, Gotor C, Meyer AJ, Fricker M, Vega JM, Romero LC (2000) Glutathione biosynthesis in Arabidopsis trichome cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11108–11113[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hagan N, Upadhyaya N, Tabe L, Higgins T (2003) The redistribution of protein sulfur in transgenic rice expressing a gene for a foreign, sulfur-rich protein. Plant J 34: 1–11[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hartmann TN, Fricker MD, Rennenberg H, Meyer AJ (2003) Cell-specific measurement of cytosolic glutathione in poplar leaves. Plant Cell Environ 26: 965–975[CrossRef][Medline]

Herschbach C, van Der Zalm E, Schneider A, Jouanin L, De Kok LJ, Rennenberg H (2000) Regulation of sulfur nutrition in wild-type and transgenic poplar over-expressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the cytosol as affected by atmospheric H₂S. Plant Physiol 124: 461–473[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Howden R, Andersen CR, Goldsbrough PB, Cobbett CS (1995) A cadmium-sensitive, glutathione-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 107: 1067–1073[Abstract]

Job C, Rajjou L, Lovigny Y, Belghazi M, Job D (2005) Patterns of protein oxidation in Arabidopsis seeds and during germination. Plant Physiol 138: 790–802[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johansson E, Olsson O, Nystrom T (2004) Progression and specificity of protein oxidation in the life cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 279: 22204–22208[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kranner I, Beckett RP, Wornik S, Zorn M, Pfeifhofer HW (2002) Revival of a resurrection plant correlates with its antioxidant status. Plant J 31: 13–24[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kuzuhara Y, Isobe A, Awazuhara M, Fujiwara T, Hayashi H (2000) Glutathione levels in phloem sap of rice plants under sulfur deficient conditions. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 46: 265–270

Lappartient AG, Touraine B (1997) Glutathione-mediated regulation of ATP sulfurylase activity, SO₄^2– uptake, and oxidative stress response in intact canola roots. Plant Physiol 114: 177–183[Abstract]

Lappartient AG, Vidmar JJ, Leustek T, Glass AD, Touraine B (1999) Inter-organ signaling in plants: regulation of ATP sulfurylase and sulfate transporter genes expression in roots mediated by phloem-translocated compound. Plant J 18: 89–95[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Leustek T, Martin MN, Bick J-A, Davies JP (2000) Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51: 141–165[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Marrs KA (1996) The functions and regulation of glutathione S-transferases in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 127–158[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Martin MN (2003) Biosynthesis and metabolism of glutathione in plants. In JK Setlow, ed, Genetic Engineering, Vol 25. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 163–188

May M, Vernoux T, Leaver C, Van Montagu M, Inze D (1998) Glutathione homeostasis in plants: implications for environmental sensing and plant development. J Exp Bot 49: 649–667[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meinke DW (1994) Seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. In EM Meyerowitz, CR Somerville, eds, Arabidopsis, Vol 27. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 253–295

Meyer A, Hell R (2005) Glutathione homeostasis and redox-regulation by sulfhydryl groups. Photosynth Res 86: 435–457[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Meyer AJ, Fricker MD (2000) Direct measurement of glutathione in epidermal cells of intact Arabidopsis roots by two-photon laser scanning microscopy. J Microsc (Oxf) 198: 174–181[CrossRef]

Meyer AJ, Fricker MD (2002) Control of demand-driven biosynthesis of glutathione in green Arabidopsis suspension culture cells. Plant Physiol 130: 1927–1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meyer AJ, May MJ, Fricker M (2001) Quantitative in vivo measurement of glutathione in Arabidopsis cells. Plant J 27: 67–78[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mullineaux PM, Karpinski S, Jimenez A, Cleary SP, Robinson C, Creissen GP (1998) Identification of cDNAs encoding plastid-targeted glutathione peroxidase. Plant J 13: 375–379[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Noctor G, Foyer CH (1998) Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 249–279[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Noctor G, Gomez L, Vanacker H, Foyer CH (2002) Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signalling. J Exp Bot 53: 1283–1304[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Prior A, Uhrig J, Heins L, Wiesmann A, Lillig C, Stoltze C, Soll J, Schwenn J (1999) Structural and kinetic properties of adenylyl sulfate reductase from Catharanthus roseus cell cultures. Biochim Biophys Acta 1430: 25–38[CrossRef][Medline]

Rennenberg H (1982) Glutathione metabolism and possible biological roles in higher plants. Phytochemistry 21: 2771–2781[CrossRef]

Roxas V, Smith R, Allen E, Allen R (1997) Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nat Biotechnol 15: 988–991[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sánchez-Fernández R, Fricker M, Corben LB, White NS, Sheard N, Leaver CJ, Van Montagu M, Inze D, May MJ (1997) Cell proliferation and hair tip growth in the Arabidopsis root are under mechanistically different forms of redox control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2745–2750[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sattler SE, Gilliland LU, Magallanes-Lundback M, Pollard M, DellaPenna D (2004) Vitamin E is essential for seed longevity and for preventing lipid peroxidation during germination. Plant Cell 16: 1419–1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schafer FQ, Buettner GR (2001) Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple. Free Radic Biol Med 30: 1191–1212[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sexton P, Shibles R (1999) Activity of ATP sulfurylase in reproductive soybean. Crop Sci 39: 131–135[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK (2003) Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 14672–14677[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stadler R, Lauterbach C, Sauer N (2005) Cell-to-cell movement of green fluorescent protein reveals post-phloem transport in the outer integument and identifies symplastic domains in Arabidopsis seeds and embryos. Plant Physiol 139: 701–712[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Storozhenko S, Belles-Boix E, Babiychuk E, Herouart D, Davey MW, Slooten L, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Kushnir S (2002) Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in transgenic tobacco plants: cellular localization, processing, and biochemical properties. Plant Physiol 128: 1109–1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tabe LM, Droux M (2001) Sulfur assimilation in developing lupin cotyledons could contribute significantly to the accumulation of organic sulfur reserves in the seed. Plant Physiol 126: 176–187[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tzafrir I, Pena-Muralla R, Dickerman A, Berg M, Rogers R, Hutchens S, Sweeney TC, McElver J, Aux G, Patton D, et al (2004) Identification of genes required for embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135: 1206–1220[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van der Ven A, Mier P, Peters W, Dolstra H, van Erp P, Koopmans P, van der Meer J (1994) Monochlorobimane does not selectively label glutathione in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Anal Biochem 217: 41–47[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vernoux T, Wilson RC, Seeley KA, Reichheld JP, Muroy S, Brown S, Maughan SC, Cobbett CS, Van Montagu M, Inze D, et al (2000) The ROOT MERISTEMLESS1/CADMIUM SENSITIVE2 gene defines a glutathione-dependent pathway involved in initiation and maintenance of cell division during postembryonic root development. Plant Cell 12: 97–110[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wachter A, Wolf S, Steininger H, Bogs J, Rausch T (2005) Differential targeting of GSH1 and GSH2 is achieved by multiple transcription initiation: implications for the compartmentation of glutathione biosynthesis in the Brassicaceae. Plant J 41: 15–30[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Weber M, Suter M, Brunold C, Kopriva S (2000) Sulfate assimilation in higher plants characterization of a stable intermediate in the adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase reaction. Eur J Biochem 267: 3647–3653[Web of Science][Medline]

Xiang C, Werner BL, Christensen EM, Oliver DJ (2001) The biological functions of glutathione revisited in Arabidopsis transgenic plants with altered glutathione levels. Plant Physiol 126: 564–574[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zang TM, Hollman DA, Crawford PA, Crowder MW, Makaroff CA (2001) Arabidopsis glyoxalase II contains a zinc/iron binuclear metal center that is essential for substrate binding and catalysis. J Biol Chem 276: 4788–4795[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Maughan, M. Pasternak, N. Cairns, G. Kiddle, T. Brach, R. Jarvis, F. Haas, J. Nieuwland, B. Lim, C. Muller, et al. Plant homologs of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter, PfCRT, are required for glutathione homeostasis and stress responses PNAS, February 2, 2010; 107(5): 2331 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Scheerer, R. Haensch, R. R. Mendel, S. Kopriva, H. Rennenberg, and C. Herschbach Sulphur flux through the sulphate assimilation pathway is differently controlled by adenosine 5'-phosphosulphate reductase under stress and in transgenic poplar plants overexpressing {gamma}-ECS, SO, or APR J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2010; 61(2): 609 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Frottin, C. Espagne, J. A. Traverso, C. Mauve, B. Valot, C. Lelarge-Trouverie, M. Zivy, G. Noctor, T. Meinnel, and C. Giglione Cotranslational Proteolysis Dominates Glutathione Homeostasis to Support Proper Growth and Development PLANT CELL, October 1, 2009; 21(10): 3296 - 3314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Marty, W. Siala, M. Schwarzlander, M. D. Fricker, M. Wirtz, L. J. Sweetlove, Y. Meyer, A. J. Meyer, J.-P. Reichheld, and R. Hell The NADPH-dependent thioredoxin system constitutes a functional backup for cytosolic glutathione reductase in Arabidopsis PNAS, June 2, 2009; 106(22): 9109 - 9114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Queval, D. Thominet, H. Vanacker, M. Miginiac-Maslow, B. Gakiere, and G. Noctor H2O2-Activated Up-Regulation of Glutathione in Arabidopsis Involves Induction of Genes Encoding Enzymes Involved in Cysteine Synthesis in the Chloroplast Mol Plant, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 344 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Colville and N. Smirnoff Antioxidant status, peroxidase activity, and PR protein transcript levels in ascorbate-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana vtc mutants J. Exp. Bot., October 9, 2008; (2008) ern229v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zechmann, F. Mauch, L. Sticher, and M. Muller Subcellular immunocytochemical analysis detects the highest concentrations of glutathione in mitochondria and not in plastids J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(14): 4017 - 4027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Watanabe, K. Mochida, T. Kato, S. Tabata, N. Yoshimoto, M. Noji, and K. Saito Comparative Genomics and Reverse Genetics Analysis Reveal Indispensable Functions of the Serine Acetyltransferase Gene Family in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, September 1, 2008; 20(9): 2484 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Martin, P. H. Saladores, E. Lambert, A. O. Hudson, and T. Leustek Localization of Members of the {gamma}-Glutamyl Transpeptidase Family Identifies Sites of Glutathione and Glutathione S-Conjugate Hydrolysis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1715 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Reichheld, M. Khafif, C. Riondet, M. Droux, G. Bonnard, and Y. Meyer Inactivation of Thioredoxin Reductases Reveals a Complex Interplay between Thioredoxin and Glutathione Pathways in Arabidopsis Development PLANT CELL, June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1851 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Imin, M. Nizamidin, T. Wu, and B. G. Rolfe Factors involved in root formation in Medicago truncatula J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 439 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 141/2/446    most recent pp.106.077982v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Agricola Articles by Cairns, N. G. Articles by Meyer, A. J. Related Collections Reactive Oxygen Species