|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 25, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.080895 Plant Physiology 142:526-541 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists The turnip Mutant of Arabidopsis Reveals That LEAFY COTYLEDON1 Expression Mediates the Effects of Auxin and Sugars to Promote Embryonic Cell Identity1,[W]Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
The transition from embryonic to vegetative growth marks an important developmental stage in the plant life cycle. The turnip (tnp) mutant was identified in a screen for modifiers of POLARIS expression, a gene required for normal root growth. Mapping and molecular characterization of tnp shows that it represents a gain-of-function mutant of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), due to a promoter mutation. This results in the ectopic expression of LEC1, but not of other LEC genes, in vegetative tissues. The LEC class of genes are known regulators of embryogenesis, involved in the control of embryonic cell identity by currently unknown mechanisms. Activation of the LEC-dependent pathway in tnp leads to the loss of hypocotyl epidermal cell marker expression and loss of SCARECROW expression in the endodermis, the ectopic accumulation of starch and lipids, and the up-regulation of early and late embryonic genes. tnp also shows partial deetiolation during dark growth. Penetrance of the mutant phenotype is strongly enhanced in the presence of exogenous auxin and sugars, but not by gibberellin or abscisic acid, and is antagonized by cytokinin. We propose that the role of LEC1 in embryonic cell fate control requires auxin and sucrose to promote cell division and embryonic differentiation.
The early stages of embryogenesis in flowering plants involve the establishment of polarity, radial symmetry, and cellular differentiation as well as the formation of the shoot and root meristems, which determine postembryonic development (Laux et al., 2004
The LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC) class of genes (LEC1 and LEC2 and FUSCA3 and FUS3) have been identified as key regulators of late embryogenesis (Parcy et al., 1997
As well as being key regulators of late embryogenesis, LEC genes have been shown to regulate aspects of early embryogenesis. The suspensors of LEC mutants develop abnormally, and in the case of lec1-2 fus3-3 double mutants the suspensor can continue to proliferate and form secondary embryos, suggesting that LEC genes may act to maintain suspensor cell fate and inhibit the embryonic potential of the suspensor. LEC1 expression is limited to embryogenesis while LEC2 and FUS3 are also expressed at low levels postgermination. Ectopic expression of LEC1 or LEC2 under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter has been shown to be sufficient to induce embryonic characteristics in vegetative tissue, suggesting that these genes regulate embryogenic competence (Lotan et al., 1998
Further evidence that LEC genes are regulators of embryo development has come from studies of the PICKLE (PKL) gene that encodes a CHD3 chromatin-remodelling factor (Ogas et al., 1999
The involvement of growth regulators, particularly auxin, in both zygotic and somatic embryogenesis has been widely reported (Toonen and de Vries, 1996 Here we describe the characterization of the turnip (tnp) mutant of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), which we show is a gain-of-function mutant of LEC1. We describe results of experiments to investigate the relationship between LEC1 expression and hormonal and nutritional modifiers of embryonic development, and discuss how LEC1 may act in concert with auxin and sugars to potentiate embryonic pathways.
Identification of the tnp Mutant
The polaris (pls) mutant is defective in a gene encoding a predicted small polypeptide necessary for correct root growth (Casson et al., 2002
tnp Is Dominant But Shows Incomplete Penetrance The number of tnp seedlings present in the T2 population was greater than expected for a single, recessive locus, suggesting that the mutation may be dominant (126 wild type/170 tnp). Segregation analysis on T2 seedlings revealed that the tnp mutation was not associated with the presence of a T-DNA (12/55 hygromycin sensitive seedlings were tnp). PCR analysis of the F2 progeny of a tnp/Columbia-0 (Col-0) cross indicated that the mutation was not due to the presence of a partial activation tag nor was it dependent on the pls mutation (data not shown).
While the data indicated that tnp is a dominant mutation, segregation analysis of independent T3 lines showed that the penetrance of the tnp phenotype was highly variable between lines, ranging typically from 0% to 60%. To determine if the incomplete penetrance was due to methylation-dependent gene silencing, individual T3 sibling lines were germinated in the presence of 100 µM 5-azacytidine, a methylation inhibitor (Jones and Taylor, 1980
The tnp Mutant Shows Altered Cell Identity tnp seedlings exhibit a high degree of phenotypic variability and on rare occasions prove to be seedling lethal (Fig. 1B, top left, arrow). tnp mutants with the strongest phenotype have the whole hypocotyl replaced by the swollen structure (Fig. 1B, bottom right) while those with a weaker phenotype display extreme curling of the hypocotyl with some evidence of dense, greening cells (Fig. 1B, top middle and right). While the structure was most commonly found at the root-hypocotyl junction, it could be present anywhere along the hypocotyl. Examination of embryos from tnp and control siliques did not reveal any morphological differences, suggesting that the phenotypic defect develops after germination. Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the surface patterning of the abnormal hypocotyl. The epidermal cells were found to be much smaller and flatter than those of the pls parent (Fig. 1, C and D). While the cells in tnp remained in strict files, occasionally abnormal divisions occurred within a file generating a number of even smaller cells (Fig. 1E). At the boundary of the abnormal hypocotyl, cells were seen to undergo excessive elongation (Fig. 1F). To determine whether this altered morphogenesis was associated with any change in internal cell patterning, transverse and longitudinal sections of the structure were examined. No obvious patterning defects were observed (Fig. 2, A and B ). Sectioning revealed, however, that the cells in the abnormal region of the hypocotyl were virtually devoid of a vacuole, and that the transition from abnormal to normal cells did not occur at a strict boundary across the structure (Fig. 2C).
The absence of a large central vacuole and the dense staining of the cells with toluidine blue resembled storage tissue, so the cells were tested for the presence of storage compounds. Staining with Lugol's solution indicated that the cells were packed with starch granules (Fig. 2D), and staining with Fat Red indicated the presence of large amounts of lipids (Fig. 2E).
The altered morphogenesis, high levels of starch and lipids, and the altered expression of PLS in the abnormal hypocotyl region suggested an alteration in cell identity. To examine this further, the expression patterns of other markers were investigated. Epidermal cells of the hypocotyl are marked by expression of the Haseloff J2662 and J2601 green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker lines (http://www.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/Haseloff/). In tnp seedlings, expression was absent in the cells of the swollen structure but was present in cells above it (Fig. 3, AD
). The ARR5/IBC6::GFP (Brandstatter and Kieber, 1998
Ordinarily, growth of the hypocotyl after embryogenesis is purely via cell expansion (Gendreau et al., 1997
Growing tnp seedlings in the dark and in the presence of 1% Suc resulted in a lower rate of penetrance than light-grown tnp seedlings (11.3% versus 16.7%; n = 200). It was also observed that the dark-grown seedlings underwent partial deetiolation (Fig. 4, AC
). During dark growth, the SAM of the pls control was not activated, whereas in the case of tnp seedlings the petioles of the cotyledons expanded and first leaves developed after 7 d. It has been shown that contact of the SAM with Suc-containing medium gives rise to a similar effect (Roldán et al., 1999
Other aspects of development were also affected in tnp plants. Flowering time was found to be highly variable. The majority of plants flowered at the same time as the pls parental line, though some tnp plants were late flowering (Fig. 4D). Examination of the first true leaves of tnp revealed that they were more elliptical than those of pls (Fig. 4E).
Segregation analysis had shown that the tnp mutation was not associated with a T-DNA. A map-based cloning strategy was therefore used with an F2 mapping population generated by outcrossing tnp (C24 ecotype) to Col-0. TNP was tentatively positioned at approximately 40 cM on chromosome I using the simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) marker nga 280 (83 cM). To further map TNP a strategy was developed that would account for the dominant phenotype of tnp linked with the incomplete penetrance. Seed from the F2 mapping population was germinated on medium containing 2% Suc and 25 nM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), which had been found to result in the highest penetrance of tnp without affecting growth (see below), therefore increasing the proportion of TNP/tnp heterozygotes in the population. SSLP analysis was then performed with markers expected to be located on either side of the TNP gene, and plants were identified that had a Col-0 ecotype at one marker and were Col-0/C24 at the second marker, and vice versa. Hence, the dominant tnp heterozygote was used to map TNP. Using this approach, 24/800 plants were found to be Col-0 with the marker nga 248 (42.17 cM, bacterial artificial chromosome [BAC] F3H9) and 1/800 was Col-0 at the marker F24J8 (approximately 32 cM, BAC F24J8). These plants were Col-0/C24 heterozygotes at the alternative marker. Fine mapping was able to place TNP onto either BAC T26F17 or F2E2 (Fig. 5A ).
BAC T26F17 contains the LEC1 gene (Lotan et al., 1998
One possibility we considered was that a nucleotide change in the LEC1 promoter could result in ectopic expression of LEC1, as observed in the pkl mutant. Therefore, semiquantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was performed to determine the levels of LEC1 transcript levels in seedlings at 1 to 2 d postgermination. While low levels of LEC1 were detected in RNA from control germinating seedlings, LEC1 transcript levels were strongly up-regulated in the tnp mutant, whereas LEC2, which is also up-regulated in pkl (Dean Rider et al., 2003
To determine if the up-regulation of LEC1 in tnp was due to a mutation in the promoter region, genomic DNA upstream of the LEC1 transcriptional start site was amplified by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (Liu et al., 1995
The tnp mutant phenotype is similar to that of the pkl mutant, which is characterized by the development of swollen and greenish roots that accumulate triacylglycerols and protein bodies (Ogas et al., 1997
Auxin and Suc Increase Penetrance of the tnp Phenotype The penetrance of the pkl mutant phenotype is also variable and is affected by GA and the GA biosynthesis inhibitor, uniconazole-P. To determine if growth factors affect penetrance of the tnp phenotype, tnp seed was germinated and grown in the presence of a number of compounds (Table II ).
As with pkl, penetrance of tnp was increased in the presence of a GA biosynthetic inhibitor, paclobutrazol. Unlike pkl however, GA was not found to suppress penetrance of tnp and indeed had a weak positive effect. Interestingly, when germinated in the presence of both 10 nM paclobutrazol and 10 µM GA, the positive effect of the paclobutrazol was partially suppressed (data not shown). The natural auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and synthetic auxins naphthylacetic acid and 2,4-D each had a positive effect on penetrance of the tnp phenotype at low concentration. Of the auxins tested 2,4-D was the most effective, increasing penetrance to nearly 100% at 1 µM. The auxin transport inhibitors napthylphthalamic acid (NPA) and 1-naphthoxyacetic acid (NOA) were also found to have a positive effect on tnp penetrance, whereas the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid was found to have little effect. The cytokinin benzyladenine (BA) was the only compound tested that markedly suppressed penetrance of the tnp phenotype, though this was only significant at concentrations above 100 nM. Among other compounds tested, abscisic acid (ABA) was not found to have an effect on penetrance and tnp seedlings showed no difference in sensitivity to ABA in germination studies (data not shown). Given the large quantities of starch stored in tnp, the effect of sugars on penetrance was examined. Absence of Suc in the medium resulted in a complete loss of penetrance of the tnp phenotype while the highest penetrance was observed with 2% Suc. The addition of 10 nM 2,4-D to the medium always resulted in greater penetrance than with Suc alone, even in the absence of Suc, suggesting that these compounds act via different pathways to increase penetrance (Table III ). One-percent Glc or Fru were not as potent as Suc, though the addition of 2,4-D resulted in comparable rates of penetrance, indicating that auxin is more effective at increasing the penetrance than is the carbon source (data not shown).
The ability of auxins and auxin transport inhibitors to increase the penetrance of the tnp phenotype raised the possibility that auxin distribution or levels are affected in tnp mutants. The auxin-inducible reporter IAA2-GUS (Swarup et al., 2001
High Suc or Glc concentrations in the growth medium are known to inhibit germination and have been used in selection screens for identifying sugar sensitivity mutants (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000 Given that the penetrance of the tnp phenotype requires the presence of sugars in the growth medium, we monitored starch accumulation to examine whether the continued presence of sugars is required for the maintenance of starch in the tnp hypocotyl. tnp seedlings were germinated in the presence of 1% Suc and at 3 d postgermination were either transferred to the same medium or medium lacking Suc. Eight days after transfer, starch levels in tnp seedlings grown on medium lacking Suc were significantly lower than those maintained on Suc (Supplemental Fig. S1), indicating that a continued supply of Suc is required for starch accumulation.
To eliminate the possibility that the increased penetrance of the tnp phenotype in response to sugars is due to an osmotic stress response, penetrance was determined in the presence of mannitol. It has been shown that under certain conditions osmotic stress can induce somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis (Ikeda-Iwai et al., 2003
One mechanism by which auxin, paclobutrazol, and cytokinin could affect tnp penetrance would be to alter the levels of LEC1 transcript, with higher transcript levels associated with greater penetrance. Germinating seedlings were therefore treated with these compounds, as well as with GA, which has no effect on penetrance, and RNA was extracted 1 to 2 d postgermination LEC1 transcript levels were determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR and were found to be unaltered in response to these compounds in both tnp and pls controls (Fig. 8A ). Therefore, the effect on penetrance by these compounds is not mediated by alterations in LEC1 transcript levels, though posttranscriptional or -translational effects cannot be excluded.
An alternative possibility is that these compounds act by altering the expression of other key embryonic regulators to alter penetrance. FUS3 and LEC2 play key roles in embryogenesis and the transition to germination (Luerßen et al., 1998
The hypocotyl of the tnp mutant appears to have acquired embryo-like characteristics. While LEC1 expression is up-regulated in tnp seedlings, the expression of other LEC-family members LEC2 and FUS3 is not affected. To further investigate the nature of the gene expression changes occurring in tnp mutants we examined the expression of several genes associated with both early and late embryogenesis using semiquantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 9
). The somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase (SERK1) gene has been found to enhance the embryonic competence of cultured cells, while SERK2 is its most closely related family member (Hecht et al., 2001
Both SERK1 and SERK2 were found to be up-regulated in 2-d-old tnp seedlings (Fig. 9). The expression of WOX2 and WOX8 was extremely low and variable. In contrast, all the genes associated with storage compound production were up-regulated in tnp seedlings, indicating that seed maturation pathways are activated in tnp vegetative tissues. Finally, AtWLIM2 expression, like LEC2, was not altered in tnp, indicating that only LEC1, and most probably not other PKL targets, are affected in tnp mutants.
The deletion in tnp mutants lies in the region between the LEC1 gene and another gene, At1g21980, a putative 1-phosphatidylinositol-4-P 5-kinase (PIP5K; Mikami et al., 1998
LEC1 is an important regulator of both early and late embryogenesis and is also required for somatic embryogenesis (Gaj et al., 2005
The tnp mutation mapped to a deletion of part of the regulatory region of the LEC1 gene, leading to an increased transcript abundance in seedlings. Since lec1-dtnp embryos did not display any defects in morphology or desiccation tolerance, we conclude that the levels of LEC1 mRNA are not altered enough to disrupt normal embryo development. In contrast to previous reports (Lotan et al., 1998
PKL is a member of the CHD3 family of chromatin-remodeling factors, which form part of a NuRD histone deacetylase complex that has been shown to be involved in transcriptional repression in animal systems (Ahringer, 2000
At1g21980 encodes a putative 1-phosphatidylinositol-4-P 5-kinase (PIP5K) that is involved in the synthesis of the intermediates phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Phosphoinositide signaling is believed to be involved in stress responses (Zhu, 2002
Previous analysis of lec1 mutants has shown that LEC1 is required to specify embryonic organ identity (lec1 mutants develop cotyledons with leaf-like features), and is also involved in activating pathways involved in storage product accumulation (Meinke et al., 1994
Nevertheless, the ectopic expression of LEC1 in lec1-dtnp did result in some or all of the hypocotyls acquiring embryonic traits, most notably the activation of embryonic genes and altered patterns of hypocotyl markers (Figs. 3 and 9). The most evident phenotypic effect was the accumulation of large amounts of starch and lipids. Starch is not normally a major storage product in mature Arabidopsis embryos, and lec1 mutants themselves accumulate more starch than wild-type embryos. There are suggestions that starch is a default storage deposition pathway (Lin et al., 1999
The analysis of gene expression in tnp mutants reveals that along with LEC1, the transcript levels of SERK1 and SERK2 are up-regulated in comparison to control seedlings. This supports the view that at least some cells in tnp mutants have acquired embryonic identity. That LEC1 is required for embryonic competence is supported by the observation that the ability of cultured cells to undergo somatic embryogenesis is severely impaired in lec1 mutants (Gaj et al., 2005
As seen in the tnp/pkl cross, other embryonic pathways must be activated to activate organogenesis. A key factor here may be the level LEC1 expression. For example, Kagaya et al. (2005)
It has been reported recently that LEC2 activates the maturation phase genes IAA30 and AGL15 and that these genes may also have a role in early embryogenesis (Braybrook et al., 2006
Examination of CYCAT1:CDB:GUS activity in lec1-dtnp revealed that cells in the swollen hypocotyl continue to divide, consistent with the altered cell shape (Figs. 1 and 3). Since growth of the wild-type hypocotyl epidermal and cortical cells is normally by cell expansion, with all the cells in place by the end of embryogenesis (Gendreau et al., 1997
Altered cytokinin distribution or sensitivity, marked by ectopic IBC6/ARR5::GFP activity in lec1-dtnp seedlings, may also mechanistically contribute to the ectopic cell division activity. The IBC6/ARR5 gene is a member of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family, and is specifically up-regulated in response to cytokinins (Brandstatter and Kieber, 1998
A potential change in cytokinin localization or sensing may also explain the partially deetiolated phenotype of lec1-dtnp seedlings when grown in the dark. Growth in the presence of cytokinin is known to cause deetiolation (Chory et al., 1994
Furthermore, the presence of cytokinin in the epidermis may explain in part why shoots developed from the embryo-like hypocotyl tissue in lec1-dtnp pkl double mutants, but not from single lec1-dtnp. PKL is required for the repression of key embryonic genes other than LEC1, for example LEC2 (Dean Rider et al., 2003
The modulation of penetrance of the lec1-dtnp phenotype by exogenous signaling molecules provides new information on their possible interaction with the LEC1-mediated pathway of embryonic development.
The penetrance of the lec1-dtnp phenotype is almost entirely dependent on the presence of a carbon source in the growth medium, with Suc found to be the most effective. Additionally, treatment with the auxin 2,4-D causes low levels of penetrance in the absence of Suc. The dramatic accumulation of starch and lipids in the lec1-dtnp hypocotyl is a major feature of the lec1-dtnp phenotype. It has been shown in the cotyledons of Vicia faba embryos that relatively high Suc concentrations promote storage cell differentiation and starch production (Borisjuk et al., 2002
While Suc increases penetrance of the lec1-dtnp phenotype, plant hormones were also found to be influential. This observation is similar to that for the pkl mutant, where GA and GA inhibitors significantly affect penetrance (Ogas et al., 1997
The two hormones that most dramatically and differentially affected penetrance of lec1-dtnp were auxin and cytokinin, both of which have been widely used to induce embryogenic competence in somatic cells (e.g. Toonen and de Vries, 1996
PLS expression is auxin regulated (Topping and Lindsey, 1997 The auxin transport inhibitors NPA and NOA were also able to increase the penetrance of lec1-dtnp. One possible explanation is that, by blocking auxin transport, there is an accumulation of auxin in some cells. Alternatively the transport inhibitors might disrupt the balance of auxin and cytokinin activities. The observation that the concentrations of 2,4-D required to increase lec1-dtnp penetrance are much lower than those required to initiate somatic embryogenesis (typically 420 µM) indicate that the cells of the lec1-dtnp hypocotyl are already primed by the ectopic expression of LEC1.
The results of the semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis indicate that the actions of auxin and cytokinin may be partly due to their effect on LEC2 and FUS3 expression. Cytokinin treatment resulted in repression of these two genes while 2,4-D repressed LEC2 while increasing the levels of FUS3, supporting other studies that have shown that auxin induces FUS3 expression (Gazzarrini et al., 2004
Treatment with the methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine also increased the penetrance of the lec1-dtnp phenotype. Methylation is one mechanism by which genes can be transcriptionally repressed (Fransz and de Jong, 2002
In summary, the results demonstrate that the role of LEC1 as a key regulator of embryogenesis is promoted by auxin and Suc. Repression of the LEC1 pathway in postembryonic tissues, which may in part be controlled by DNA methylation, is necessary not only to suppress storage product accumulation, but also cell division and cell fate. Further analysis of lec1-dtnp should help elucidate the role of these signals in determining the embryogenic competence of plant cells.
Materials and Growth Conditions
The tnp mutant was isolated in an activation-tagging screen of the pls mutant. The pls line (Arabidopsis [Arabidopsis thaliana] ecotype C24) contains the promoter trap p
For in vitro growth studies, seeds were vernalized and surface sterilized (Clarke et al., 1992 Arabidopsis seeds transgenic for the IBC6/ARR5::GFP gene fusion were kindly provided by Joe Kieber (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill). SCR::GFP seeds were kindly donated by Philip Benfey (Duke University, North Carolina). CYCAT1:CDB:GUS seeds were kindly provided by Marie-Theres Hauser (University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna). IAA2::GUS seeds were kindly provided by Malcolm Bennett (University of Nottingham, UK). J2662, J2601, and pkl1-1 seeds were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (Nottingham, UK). J2662 and J2601 are part of the Jim Haseloff enhancer-trap GFP lines. Marker lines were crossed with tnp and F2 seedlings examined.
For scanning electron microscopy, tissues were fixed overnight in 2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), dehydrated in an acetone series of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%. Tissue was sputter coated with gold palladium (550 Å) following critical point drying. Samples were viewed using a JEOL JSM IC848 microscope (JEOL). Tissues were cleared and mounted for light microscopy in chloral hydrate (Topping and Lindsey, 1997 Light micrographs were taken using a CoolSNAP and compared with digital camera (Photometrics, Roper Scientific) with Openlab 3.1.1 software (Improvision) on Leica MZ125 (Leica Microsystems), Olympus SZH10 (Olympus), or Zeiss Axioskop (Carl Zeiss) microscopes. Confocal images were taken with a Bio-Rad Radiance 2000 microscope after counterstaining of tissues with 10 µg/mL propidium iodide. Images were processed in Adobe Photoshop 5.0.
tnp plants of the C24 ecotype were crossed to plants of the Col-0 ecotype to generate a mapping population and 800 F2 progeny showing the tnp phenotype were isolated. DNA was extracted from these progeny according to the method of Edwards et al. (1991)
Tissue localization of GUS enzyme activity was performed as described (Topping and Lindsey, 1997
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Received March 26, 2006; accepted July 31, 2006; published September 1, 2006.
1 This work was supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (to K.L.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Keith Lindsey (keith.lindsey{at}durham.ac.uk).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.080895 * Corresponding author; e-mail keith.lindsey{at}durham.ac.uk; fax 441913341201.
Ahringer J (2000) NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet 16: 351356[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Arenas-Huertero F, Arroyo A, Zhou L, Sheen J, Leon P (2000) Analysis of Arabidopsis glucose insensitive mutants, gin5 and gin6, reveals a central role of the plant hormone ABA in the regulation of plant vegetative development by sugar. Genes Dev 14: 20852096 Basu S, Sun H, Brian L, Quatrano RL, Muday GK (2002) Early embryo development in Fucus distichus is auxin sensitive. Plant Physiol 130: 292302 Borisjuk L, Walenta S, Rolletschek H, Mueller-Klieser W, Wobus U, Weber H (2002) Spatial analysis of plant metabolism: sucrose imaging within Vicia faba cotyledons reveals specific developmental patterns. Plant J 29: 521530[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Brandstatter I, Kieber JJ (1998) Two genes with similarity to bacterial response regulators are rapidly and specifically induced by cytokinin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10: 10091019 Braybrook SA, Stone SL, Park S, Bui AQ, Le BH, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2006) Genes directly regulated by LEAFY COTYLEDON2 provide insight into the control of embryo maturation and somatic embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 34683473 Casson S, Spencer M, Walker K, Lindsey K (2005) Laser capture microdissection for the analysis of gene expression during embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Plant J 42: 111123[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Casson SA, Chilley PM, Topping JF, Evans IM, Souter MA, Lindsey K (2002) The POLARIS gene of Arabidopsis encodes a predicted peptide required for correct root growth and leaf vascular patterning. Plant Cell 14: 17051721 Cernac A, Benning C (2004) WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the control of storage compound biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 40: 575585[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Chory J, Reinecke D, Sim S, Washburn T, Brenner M (1994) A role for cytokinins in de-etiolation in Arabidopsis: det mutants have an altered response to cytokinins. Plant Physiol 104: 339347[Abstract] Clarke MC, Wei W, Lindsey K (1992) High frequency transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol Report 10: 178189 Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 6: 735743[CrossRef] D'Agostino IB, Deruere J, Kieber JJ (2000) Characterization of the response of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family to cytokinin. Plant Physiol 124: 17061717 Dale PJ, Marks MS, Brown MM, Woolston CJ, Gunn HV, Mullineaux PM, Lewis DM, Kemp J, Chen DF, Gilmour DM, (1989) Agroinfection of wheat-inoculation of in vitro grown seedlings and embryos. Plant Sci 63: 237245 Davies PJ, editor (1995) Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ed 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands Dean Rider S Jr, Henderson JT, Jerome RE, Edenberg HJ, Romero-Severson J, Ogas J (2003) Coordinate repression of regulators of embryonic identity by PICKLE during germination in Arabidopsis. Plant J 35: 3343[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G, Hahn MG, Feldmann KA, Benfey PN (1996) The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86: 423433[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 1349 Elge S, Brearley C, Xia HJ, Kehr J, Xue HW, Mueller-Roeber B (2001) An Arabidopsis inositol phospholipid kinase strongly expressed in procambial cells: synthesis of PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 in insect cells by 5-phosphorylation of precursors. Plant J 26: 561571[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Eliasson A, Gass N, Mundel C, Baltz R, Krauter R, Evrard JL, Steinmetz A (2000) Molecular and expression analysis of a LIM protein gene family from flowering plants. Mol Gen Genet 264: 257267[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Fischer-Iglesias C, Sundberg B, Neuhaus G, Jones A (2001) Auxin distribution and transport during embryonic pattern formation in wheat. Plant J 26: 115129[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Fransz PF, de Jong JH (2002) Chromatin dynamics in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 560567[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, Offringa R, Jürgens G (2003) Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature 426: 147153[CrossRef][Medline] Gaj MD, Zhang S, Harada JJ, Lemaux PG (2005) Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 222: 977988[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gazzarrini S, Tsuchiya Y, Lumba S, Okamoto M, McCourt P (2004) The transcription factor FUSCA3 controls developmental timing in Arabidopsis through the hormones gibberellin and abscisic acid. Dev Cell 7: 373378[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gendreau E, Traas J, Desnos T, Grandjean O, Caboche M, Höfte H (1997) Cellular basis of hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 114: 295305[Abstract] Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Stockinger EJ, Salazar MP, Houghton JM, Thomashow MF (1998) Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression. Plant J 16: 433442[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Haecker A, Gross-Hardt R, Geiges B, Sarkar A, Breuninger H, Herrmann M, Laux T (2004) Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131: 657668 Hamann T, Benkova E, Bäurle I, Kientz M, Jürgens G (2002) The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes Dev 16: 16101615 Hardtke CS, Berleth T (1998) The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J 17: 14051411[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Hauser M-T, Bauer E (2000) Histochemical analysis of root meristem activity in Arabidopsis thaliana using a cyclin:GUS (beta-glucuronidase) marker line. Plant Soil 226: 110 Hecht V, Vielle-Calzada JP, von Recklinghausen I, Hartog M, Zwartjes C, Schmidt E, Boutilier K, Grossniklaus U, de Vries S (2001) The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol 127: 803816 Henderson JT, Li H-C, Dean Rider S, Mordhorst AP, Romero-Severson J, Cheng J-C, Robey J, Sung ZR, de Vries SC, Ogas J (2004) PICKLE acts throughout the plant to repress expression of embryonic traits and may play a role in gibberellin-dependent responses. Plant Physiol 134: 9951005 Hirayama T, Ohto C, Mizoguchi T, Shinozaki K (1995) A gene encoding a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C is induced by dehydration and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 39033907 Ikeda-Iwai M, Umehara M, Satoh S, Kamada H (2003) Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 34: 107114[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Jones P, Taylor SM (1980) Cellular differentiation, cytidine analogs and DNA methylation. Cell 20: 8593[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Kagaya Y, Toyoshima R, Okuda R, Usui H, Yamamoto A, Hattori T (2005) LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 399406 Kroj T, Savino G, Valon C, Giraudat J, Parcy F (2003) Regulation of storage protein gene expression in Arabidopsis. Development 130: 60656073 Laby RJ, Kincaid MS, Kim D, Gibson SI (2000) The Arabidopsis sugar-insensitive mutants sis4 and sis5 are defective in abscisic acid synthesis and response. Plant J 23: 587596[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Laux T, Würschum T, Breuninger H (2004) Genetic regulation of embryonic pattern formation. Plant Cell 16: S190S202 Lin Y, Sun L, Nguyen LV, Rachubinski RA, Goodman HM (1999) The Pex16p homolog SSE1 and storage organelle formation in Arabidopsis seeds. Science 284: 328330 Liu YG, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Whittier RF (1995) Efficient isolation and mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insert junctions by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR. Plant J 8: 457463[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Lotan T, Ohto M, Matsudaira Yee K, West MAL, Lo R, Kwong RW, Yamagishi K, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93: 11951205[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Luerßen H, Kirik V, Herrmann P, Miséra S (1998) FUSCA3 encodes a protein with a conserved VP1/ABI3-like B3 domain which is of functional importance for the regulation of seed maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 15: 755764[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Meinke DW, Franzmann LH, Nickle TC, Yeung EC (1994) Leafy Cotyledon mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 6: 10491064[Abstract] Mikami K, Katagiri T, Iuchi S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1998) A gene encoding phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase is induced by water stress and abscisic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 15: 563568[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Nakashima K, Fujita Y, Katsura K, Maruyama K, Narusaka Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2006) Transcriptional regulation of ABI3- and ABA-responsive genes including RD29B and RD29$ in seeds, germinating embryos, and seedlings in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 60: 5168[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Narusaka Y, Nakashima K, Shinwari ZK, Sakuma Y, Furihata T, Abe H, Narusaka M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Interaction between two cis acting elements, ABRE and DRE, in ABA-dependent expression of Arabidopsis rd29A gene in response to dehydration and high-salinity stresses. Plant J 34: 137148[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Ogas J, Cheng J-C, Sung ZR, Somerville C (1997) Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science 277: 9194 Ogas J, Kaufmann S, Henderson J, Somerville C (1999) PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodelling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1383913844 Pang PP-Y, Pruitt RE, Meyerowitz EM (1988) Molecular cloning, genomic organization, expression and evolution of 12S seed storage protein genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 11: 805820[CrossRef][Web of Science] Parcy F, Valon C, Kohara A, Miséra S, Giraudat J (1997) The ABSCISIC ACID-lNSENSITIVE3, FUSCA3, and LEAFY COTYLEDON1 loci act in concert to control multiple aspects of Arabidopsis seed development. Plant Cell 9: 12651277[Abstract] Raz V, Bergervoet JHW, Koornneef M (2001) Sequential steps for developmental arrest in Arabidopsis seeds. Development 128: 243252[Abstract] Ribnicky D, Cohen J, Hu W, Cooke T (2002) An auxin surge following fertilization in carrots: a mechanism for regulating plant totipotency. Planta 214: 505509[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Riou-Khamlichi C, Huntley R, Jacqmard A, Murray JAH (1999) Cytokinin activation of Arabidopsis cell division through a D-type cyclin. Science 283: 15411544 Roldán M, Gómez-Mena C, Ruiz-García L, Salinas J, Martínez-Zapater JM (1999) Sucrose availability on the aerial part of the plant promotes morphogenesis and flowering of Arabidopsis in the dark. Plant J 20: 581590[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sabatini S, Beis D, Wolkenfelt H, Murfett J, Guilfoyle T, Malamy J, Benfey P, Leyser O, Bechtold N, Weisbeek P, et al (1999) An auxin-dependent organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Cell 99: 463472[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sanyal A, O'Driscoll SW, Bolander MA, Sarkar G (1997) An effective method of completely removing contaminating genomic DNA from an RNA sample to be used for PCR. Mol Biotechnol 8: 135137[Web of Science][Medline] Sheldon CC, Finnegan EJ, Rouse DT, Tadege M, Bagnall DJ, Helliwell CA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2000) The control of flowering by vernalization. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 418422[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Smigocki AC, Owens LD (1988) Cytokinin gene fused with a strong promoter enhances shoot organogenesis and zeatin levels in transformed plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 51315135 Stone SL, Kwong LW, Yee KM, Pelletier J, Lepiniec L, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2001) LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1180611811 Swarup R, Friml J, Marchant A, Ljung K, Sandberg G, Palme K, Bennett M (2001) Localization of the auxin permease AUX1 suggests two functionally distinct hormone transport pathways operate in the Arabidopsis root apex. Genes Dev 15: 26482653 Telfer A, Poethig RS (1994) Leaf development in Arabidopsis. In EM Meyerowitz, CR Somerville, eds, Arabidopsis. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 379401 Toonen MAJ, de Vries SC (1996) Initiation of somatic embryos from single cells. In TL Wang, A Cuming, eds, Embryogenesis: The Generation of a Plant. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 173189 Topping JF, Agyeman F, Henricot B, Lindsey K (1994) Identification of molecular markers of embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by promoter trapping. Plant J 5: 895903[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Topping JF, Lindsey K (1997) Promoter trap markers differentiate structural and positional components of polar development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9: 17131725[Abstract] Topping JF, Wei W, Lindsey K (1991) Functional tagging of regulatory elements in the plant genome. Development 112: 10091019[Abstract] Vignali M, Hassan AH, Neely KE, Workman JL (2000) ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol Cell Biol 20: 18991910 West M, Yee KM, Danao J, Zimmerman JL, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (1994) LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is an essential regulator of late embryogenesis and cotyledon identity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 17311745 Westergren T, Dove SK, Sommarin M, Pical C (2001) AtPIP5K1, an Arabidopsis thaliana phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase, synthesizes PtdIns(3,4)P(2) and PtdIns(4,5)P(2) in vitro and is inhibited by phosphorylation. Biochem J 359: 583589[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Williams ME, Torabinejad J, Cohick E, Parker K, Drake EJ, Thompson JE, Hortter M, Dewald DB (2005) Mutations in the Arabidopsis phosphoinositide phosphatase gene SAC9 lead to overaccumulation of PtdIns(4,5)P2 and constitutive expression of the stress-response pathway. Plant Physiol 138: 686700 Wysocka-Diller JW, Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Malamy JE, Benfey PN (2000) Molecular analysis of SCARECROW function reveals a radial patterning mechanism common to root and shoot. Development 127: 595603[Abstract] Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53: 247273[CrossRef][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|