|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 4, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.085506 Plant Physiology 142:775-787 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists
Dehydroascorbate Reductase Affects Leaf Growth, Development, and Function1Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 925210129
Ascorbic acid (Asc) is a major antioxidant in plants that detoxifies reactive oxygen species (ROS) and maintains photosynthetic function. Expression of dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), responsible for regenerating Asc from an oxidized state, regulates the cellular Asc redox state, which in turn affects cell responsiveness and tolerance to environmental ROS. Because of its role in Asc recycling, we examined whether DHAR is important for plant growth. Suppression of DHAR expression resulted in a preferential loss of chlorophyll a, a lower steady state of Rubisco as measured by the amount of the large subunit of Rubisco (RbcL), and a lower rate of CO2 assimilation. As a consequence, a slower rate of leaf expansion and reduced foliar dry weight were observed. In addition, an accelerated rate of loss of chlorophyll, RbcL, light-harvesting complex II, and photosynthetic functioning was observed in mature leaves, resulting in premature leaf aging. Reduced growth rate as measured by plant height and leaf number was consistent with the DHAR-mediated reduction of photosynthetic function. Increasing DHAR expression maintained higher levels of chlorophyll, RbcL, light-harvesting complex II, and photosynthetic functioning, resulting in delayed leaf aging. The effect of DHAR expression on leaf aging inversely correlated with the level of lipid peroxidation, indicating that DHAR functions to protect against ROS-mediated damage. These observations support the conclusion that through its Asc recycling function, DHAR affects the level of foliar ROS and photosynthetic activity during leaf development and as a consequence, influences the rate of plant growth and leaf aging.
Ascorbic acid (Asc) is a major antioxidant that serves many functions in plants. Asc is involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), e.g. superoxide, singlet oxygen, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which are produced during aerobic metabolic processes such as photosynthesis or respiration (Asada and Takahashi, 1987 -tocopherol (vitamin E) from the tocopheroxyl radical (Asada, 1994
Once used, Asc is oxidized to the monodehydroascorbate (MDHA) radical that can be reduced to Asc in the chloroplast or cytosol by MDHA reductase (MDHAR) in an NAD(P)H-dependent reaction (Asada, 1999
Given that Asc is present in most cellular compartments and that several pathways exist to ensure that Asc is recycled, it might be expected that perturbations in one recycling pathway would be offset by the activity of the remaining pathways to maintain the cellular Asc redox state. However, changes in DHAR expression result in substantial alterations in the cytosolic and apoplastic Asc redox state; overexpression of DHAR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves increased the Asc redox state (i.e. was more reduced), whereas suppression of DHAR had the opposite effect (Chen et al., 2003
H2O2 functions as a signaling intermediate downstream of ABA to promote stomatal closure (Price et al., 1994
One means by which Asc reduces photoinhibition is by promoting conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in the xanthophyll cycle to dissipate excess excitation energy as part of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ). The importance of the Asc pool size in supporting growth was shown with the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) vitamin C1 (vtc1) mutant that is defective in GDP-Man pyrophosphorylase and accumulates only 25% to 30% of the wild-type level without altering the Asc redox state (Conklin et al., 1996 Because changes in DHAR expression result in substantial changes in the Asc redox state not seen in the vtc mutants, we examined whether the efficiency of Asc recycling as determined by DHAR influenced plant growth and leaf function. Plants suppressed in DHAR expression exhibited a slower rate of leaf expansion, slower shoot growth, delayed flowering time, and reduced foliar dry weight. These phenotypes correlated with reduced leaf function as measured by the preferential loss of chlorophyll a, a reduced level of Rubisco large subunit (RbcL), and a lower rate of CO2 assimilation in mature leaves. The effect of DHAR expression on leaf aging inversely correlated with the level of lipid peroxidation, indicating that the efficiency of Asc recycling was important in regulating ROS-mediated damage. These results suggest that DHAR contributes to plant growth by maintaining photosynthetic functioning through efficient Asc recycling that limits ROS-mediated damage that slows leaf aging.
Chlorophyll Pool Size, CO2 Assimilation, and Plant Growth Rate Correlate with the Level of Foliar DHAR Activity To investigate how the level of DHAR activity correlates with leaf function at the whole plant level, DHAR activity and protein levels were measured in every second leaf of mature tobacco plants just prior to flowering. DHAR activity was highest in the youngest leaves and declined with leaf age (Fig. 1A ). DHAR protein levels also were highest in the youngest leaves and declined with leaf age, although the decline in DHAR protein was not as great as the decline in DHAR activity, suggesting that DHAR activity may be posttranslationally regulated. The changes in DHAR activity largely correlated with the change in the chlorophyll a and b pool sizes (Fig. 1B) as well as the rate of CO2 assimilation (Fig. 1C). The only exception to this was that DHAR activity was near maximum in the youngest leaves when the chlorophyll a and b pool size and the rate of CO2 assimilation were not yet at maximum.
In its antioxidant function, Asc acts to maintain photosynthetic function through the detoxification of ROS as well as to maintain electron flow through PSI and PSII (Asada, 1999 To examine leaf function and growth at different leaf ages, expanding, mature, and presenescent leaves of DOX, DKD, and control plants were used for the analysis. An expanding leaf is defined as one that has achieved approximately 50% of its final size but has not reached a maximum rate of CO2 assimilation (e.g. leaf 4, Fig. 1C). A mature leaf is defined as a fully expanded leaf that exhibits a maximum rate of CO2 assimilation (e.g. leaf 6, Fig. 1C). Thus, each leaf type collected from the three lines examined was defined by its developmental stage, in the same position with regard to the apical leaf whorl, and of similar chronological age. Presenescent leaves exhibited reduced rates of CO2 assimilation relative to the maximum exhibited by a mature leaf (e.g. leaf 18, Fig. 1C) but still contained chlorophyll, albeit at significantly reduced levels. Presenescent leaves were defined according to their position (numbering from the plant base) so that leaves of equivalent chronological age could be collected from all lines to permit a comparison of various parameters of leaf aging, e.g. chlorophyll content, level of Rubisco or light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex, lipid oxidation, and leaf dry weight. All measurements were made at the same time each day during the course of an experiment to avoid any possible diurnal effects. Overexpression of wheat DHAR resulted in a substantial increase in DHAR activity in expanding, mature, and presenescent leaves (Fig. 2A ). The level of endogenous DHAR protein (DHARNt) remained unaffected in expanding and mature leaves of DOX plants as quantitated from the western analysis but was 77% higher in presenescent leaves than in control leaves (Fig. 2B). This is consistent with the prolonged maintenance of leaf function in DOX plants (see below). In contrast, DKD tobacco exhibited substantially reduced levels of DHAR activity in leaves at the same developmental stages (Fig. 2A). The level of endogenous DHARNt in expanding, mature, and presenescent leaves of DKD plants was reduced to 47%, 35%, and 44%, respectively, of the level in the corresponding leaves of control plants (Fig. 2B), data that are in good agreement with the reduction in DHAR activity (Fig. 2A). Although the level of DHAR activity declined with leaf age in DOX, DKD, and control plants, the level of activity was always higher in DOX leaves and lower in DKD leaves relative to the control (Fig. 2A).
The level of lipid peroxidation, as measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay, increased with leaf age; however, it was consistently higher in mature and presenescent leaves of DKD plants than in the corresponding leaves of DOX plants (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005; n = 3, respectively) when grown in moderate light (approximately 500 µmol m2 s1; Fig. 2A). Lipid peroxidation in presenescent DKD leaves was also significantly higher than in the corresponding leaves of control plants (P < 0.05; n = 3), indicating that the extent of lipid peroxidation may be affected by the level of foliar DHAR activity. Although the level of lipid peroxidation was consistently lower in DOX leaves relative to the control, the difference was not significant. No significant difference in lipid peroxidation was observed in expanding leaves among the three lines, suggesting that the differences in lipid peroxidation accumulated over time. Although total APX activity declined with leaf age in DOX, DKD, and control plants, no consistent change in its activity with respect to DHAR activity was observed, in good agreement with previous results (Chen et al., 2003 To examine whether changes in the level of DHAR activity influenced the induction of a senescence-related gene, expression of tobacco CP1, the ortholog of the senescence-associated gene SAG12 of Arabidopsis, was examined in DOX, DKD, and control plants using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Little to no CP1 expression was detected in mature or presenescent leaves from DOX, DKD, and control plants (Fig. 2C), supporting the conclusion that the presenescent leaves used in this study had not initiated senescence. CP1 expression was detected in senescent stage 1 DKD leaves, which were approximately 2 weeks older than the presenescent leaves used in this study (Fig. 2C). No CP1 expression was detected, however, in senescent stage 1 leaves of DOX or control plants. CP1 expression was also detected in senescent stage 2 DKD leaves (approximately 4 weeks older than the presenescent leaves used in this study), whereas expression was just detectable in senescent stage 2 DOX or control leaves (Fig. 2C). These data suggest that a reduction in the level of DHAR activity accelerates the onset of senescence. To determine whether the level of DHAR activity may affect the pool size of chlorophyll a and b, chlorophyll levels were measured in expanding, mature, or presenescent leaves of DOX, DKD, and control plants. The level of chlorophyll a was significantly higher in expanding leaves of DOX plants than in control plants (P < 0.005; n = 4) as it was in mature or presenescent leaves (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005; n = 4, respectively; Fig. 3 ), whereas it was significantly lower in DKD mature and presenescent leaves (P < 0.005 and P < 0.005; n = 4, respectively) but not in expanding DKD leaves (P = 0.085; n = 4) relative to the control. However, the level of chlorophyll a was significantly lower in expanding DKD leaves relative to expanding DOX leaves (P < 0.005; n = 4). Although a small increase in the level of chlorophyll b was observed in expanding DOX leaves relative to the control, this difference was only significant in presenescent leaves (P < 0.005; n = 4; Fig. 3). No significant difference in the level of chlorophyll b was observed in expanding DKD leaves relative to the control (P = 0.797; n = 4), but its level was significantly reduced in mature or presenescent leaves of DKD plants relative to the control (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05; n = 4, respectively). The chlorophyll a to b ratio was significantly lower in expanding, mature, and presenescent leaves of DKD plants than in DOX leaves (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, and P < 0.005; n = 4, respectively). The chlorophyll a to b ratio was also significantly lower in presenescent DKD leaves than in control leaves (P < 0.01; n = 4; Fig. 3).
The chlorophyll pool size is determined by rates of its synthesis and degradation. To investigate whether the level of DHAR activity influences the rate of chlorophyll loss, young leaves from DOX, DKD, and control plants were dark treated, and the rate of chlorophyll loss was followed over time. Although the chlorophyll pool size in DOX leaves was larger than in control leaves, the rate of chlorophyll loss from DOX leaves (i.e. loss of 38.1 µg/g fresh weight/d) was only slightly lower than that from control leaves (i.e. loss of 42.4 µg/g fresh weight/d; Fig. 4 ). The rate of chlorophyll loss from DKD leaves was more than 2-fold greater (i.e. loss of 87.1 µg/g fresh weight/d) than that from control leaves despite the use of DKD leaves with an initial chlorophyll pool size similar to control leaves.
To examine whether the observed differences among DOX, DKD, and control leaves correlated with differences in CO2 assimilation, gas exchange was measured from every second leaf. The rate of CO2 assimilation in expanding and mature leaves of DOX plants was similar to those of control plants despite a higher rate of transpiration (Fig. 5A ). The rate of stomatal conductance was too high to measure differences in these same leaves between DOX and control plants. In older, fully expanded leaves as well as in presenescent leaves, a higher rate of CO2 assimilation was observed in DOX plants. Although this correlated with a higher rate of transpiration, a lower substomatal CO2 concentration was also observed, suggesting a higher rate of CO2 assimilation (Fig. 5A). The rate of CO2 assimilation was consistently lower in all leaves of DKD plants relative to the control (Fig. 5A). In mature and presenescent leaves, this correlated with reduced rates of transpiration and stomatal conductance previously reported for DKD plants (Chen and Gallie, 2004
The reduced rate of CO2 assimilation in DKD leaves correlated with a reduced leaf dry weight of expanding and mature leaves relative to the control (P < 0.005 and P < 0.01; n = 3, respectively), although the difference was not significant in presenescent leaves (P = 0.11; n = 3; Fig. 5B). Leaf dry weight in expanding, mature, and even presenescent DKD leaves was significantly lower than DOX leaves (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05; n = 3, respectively; Fig. 5B). No significant difference in leaf dry weight was observed between expanding, mature, or presenescent leaves of DOX and control plants (P = 0.19, P = 0.83, and P = 0.08; n = 3, respectively; Fig. 5B), correlating with their similar rates of CO2 assimilation during leaf growth (Fig. 5A). To examine whether the differences in CO2 assimilation observed in DOX and DKD plants are accompanied by other changes in growth, parameters of plant growth were measured. Plant growth as measured by height over time was little altered in DOX plants relative to the control, and no change in leaf number was observed (Fig. 6 ). DOX plants flowered at the same time as control plants (Table I ). DKD plants exhibited a significantly reduced rate of growth (P < 0.005 at weeks 57; n = 8) but caught up during late growth (P = 0.130 and P = 0.161 at weeks 8 and 9, respectively; n = 8). DKD plants had significantly fewer leaves during growth (P = 0.05, P < 0.005, and P < 0.05 at weeks 5, 6, and 7, respectively; n = 8) but eventually produced the same number of leaves as the control (Fig. 6). Consistent with this, DKD plants flowered significantly later (Table I) than control plants (P = 0.001; n = 8). The average leaf internode distance of fully grown DKD plants was slightly less than that of control plants, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.9; n = 18). Although no significant difference in leaf area was observed between DOX and control plants, leaves from DKD plants were consistently smaller in size relative to the control (P = 0.0014; Fig. 6). These data indicate that the growth rate but not final plant height is reduced in DKD tobacco, suggesting that efficiency of Asc recycling is important in maintaining maximum growth. Because increasing DHAR expression did not increase plant growth, the endogenous level of DHAR activity appears to be sufficient to support a maximum growth rate.
The Level of DHAR Activity Correlates with the Maintenance of Chlorophyll a and Leaf Growth Rate
The previous analyses provided insight into how DHAR activity affects growth at the level of the whole plant. However, it is not valid to assume that expanding, mature, and presenescent leaves from a single plant are representative of the developmental stages that a specific leaf undergoes during its development, as not all leaves on a given plant are biochemically or functionally equivalent (e.g. leaf size, chlorophyll content). Therefore, to investigate how DHAR activity affects growth of a specific leaf, we followed the growth of the sixth true leaf (as numbered from the plant base) in DOX, DKD, and control plants. We first measured the area of the sixth true leaf when the leaf was fully expanded, a value that remained constant for a given line when the plants were grown under identical conditions. From the area of the sixth true leaf in its fully expanded state, sixth true leaves could be analyzed during their growth when they were 8%, 50%, or 100% of the fully expanded size. DHAR activity and protein level on a fresh weight basis declined during leaf expansion in control plants as it did in DOX and DKD plants (Fig. 7, A and B
). Correlating with the decline in DHAR was a decrease in the Asc pool size and redox state (i.e. more oxidized) during the expansion of control leaves (Fig. 7A). The decrease in protein and Asc pool size may be explained in part by the dilution during the cell expansion that occurs during leaf growth. In contrast, dilution does not account for the oxidation of the Asc redox state. As reported previously (Chen and Gallie, 2004
The pool size of chlorophyll a and b in control leaves declined concomitantly during leaf expansion such that the chlorophyll a/b ratio was largely unaltered (Fig. 8A ). Although the pool size of chlorophyll a in DKD leaves was not significantly different from control leaves when the leaves were 8% of their fully expanded state (P = 0.437; n = 4), it was significantly lower than the control when the leaves reached 50% or 100% of the fully expanded state (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05; n = 4; Fig. 8A). In contrast, the pool size of chlorophyll a in DOX leaves was significantly higher than in control leaves at 8%, 50%, and 100% of the fully expanded state (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively; n = 4), although the pool size of chlorophyll b was not significantly different from the control (Fig. 8A). Thus, although the chlorophyll a/b ratio in DOX and DKD leaves was not significantly different when the leaves were 8% of their fully expanded state (P = 0.189; n = 4), it was significantly lower in DKD leaves when the leaves reached 50% or 100% of the fully expanded state (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; n = 4; Fig. 8A). These data suggest that increasing DHAR activity increases the pool size of chlorophyll a from early leaf development up to senescence, whereas decreasing DHAR activity does not affect the initial pool size of chlorophyll a but does result in a preferential loss of chlorophyll a during subsequent leaf expansion and aging.
To examine how alterations in the efficiency of Asc recycling resulting from changes in DHAR expression affected CO2 assimilation as a leaf ages, gas exchange was measured in expanding leaves every 3 d. The rate of CO2 assimilation in DOX leaves was similar to control leaves during leaf expansion but declined at a slower rate as the leaf aged, correlating with a higher stomatal conductance (Fig. 9 ). The rate of CO2 assimilation was consistently lower in DKD leaves throughout its expansion and subsequent aging. The reduced level of CO2 assimilation in DKD leaves could not be explained by a corresponding reduction in stomatal conductance but did correlate with a higher level of substomatal CO2 concentration (Fig. 9), suggesting less efficient assimilation of CO2.
The rate of leaf expansion was followed for the same cohort of leaves and revealed that DOX and control leaves expanded at the same rate (P = 0.91; n = 8), whereas the expansion of DKD leaves was significantly delayed relative to the control (P = 0.028; n = 8; Fig. 10 ; Table I). The reduced rate of CO2 assimilation and slower rate of expansion of DKD leaves correlated with a reduced leaf dry weight throughout leaf expansion (Fig. 8B) that was similar to the reduced leaf dry weight observed for all leaves of adult plants (Fig. 5B). No significant difference in leaf dry weight during leaf expansion was observed between DOX and control leaves (Fig. 8B), correlating with their similar rates of CO2 assimilation during early leaf growth (Fig. 9).
In this study, we present evidence suggesting that the level of foliar DHAR activity influences the rate of leaf aging, and, as a consequence, the rate of plant growth. We were able to take advantage of the fact that DHAR is expressed in limiting amounts with regard to the Asc redox state (Chen et al., 2003
The observation that increasing DHAR expression correlated with higher levels of RbcL and chlorophyll and a higher rate of CO2 assimilation in presenescent leaves, whereas reducing DHAR expression in the same leaves correlated with a lower level of RbcL and LHCII, a smaller pool size of chlorophyll, and reduced rate of CO2 assimilation indicates that the level of foliar DHAR activity can affect the rate of loss of leaf function. The progressive loss of DHAR as a function of leaf age, correlating with a loss of chlorophyll and CO2 assimilation rate, is consistent with a potential role for this enzyme in influencing the rate of leaf aging. The fact that reducing DHAR expression correlated with slower growth is also consistent with a role of DHAR in influencing leaf aging. The observation that increasing the level of DHAR activity correlated with reduced lipid peroxidation whereas reducing DHAR activity correlated with increased lipid peroxidation particularly during leaf aging is consistent with previous observations demonstrating an inverse relationship between the level of DHAR expression and the foliar level of ROS (Chen and Gallie, 2004
Because no change in the photosynthetic capacity or in H2O2 levels was observed in the Arabidopsis vtc1 mutant, it was suggested that the low Asc pool size did not impair photosynthetic functioning or result in oxidative stress (Veljovic-Jovanovic et al., 2001
In contrast to vtc mutants, DKD plants showed reduced photosynthetic function and reduced growth in moderate light. Plants suppressed for DHAR are not substantially Asc deficient but rather have a decreased Asc redox state (i.e. more oxidized) that may explain the differences observed between the present plants and the vtc mutants. However, the fact that perturbations to the Asc pool through changes in Asc biosynthesis (vtc mutants) or recycling (DHAR-silenced lines) can affect photosynthetic function under certain growth conditions suggests that the Asc pool is important to leaf function. The correlations between changes in DHAR activity and changes in the foliar level of H2O2 (Chen and Gallie, 2004
Plant Transformation and Growth Conditions
Full-length wheat (Triticum aestivum) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) DHAR cDNAs (accession nos. AY074784 and AY074787, respectively) were isolated as described previously (Chen et al., 2003 All plants were grown in commercial soil in a glasshouse supplied with charcoal-filtered air. Experiments were carried out and repeated from fall to spring to avoid excessive heat or light. Plants were watered to saturation twice/day (7 AM and 1 PM) to ensure even soil moisture. Plants were grown under natural light conditions in a 10-h light and 14-h dark cycle. The average temperature during the day was 25.9°C ± 0.6°C and 20.2°C ± 0.5°C during the night. The average light intensity in the morning (9 AM) was 514 ± 206 µmol m2 s1 and in the afternoon (1 PM) was 1,191 ± 244 µmol m2 s1. To determine leaf area during leaf expansion, digital images were taken at 3-d intervals. Leaf area was calculated using Adobe Photoshop (version 6.0) by normalizing total leaf size to an internal standard included in each image. Eight leaves at each developmental stage were measured, and the data were processed using Microsoft Excel. Leaf area of whole plants was determined using the same approach by measuring the area of every other leaf. For leaf expansion studies, we used the sixth true leaf as numbered from the plant base. The area of the sixth true leaf of DOX, DKD, and control plants measured when the leaf was fully expanded remained constant for a given line when the plants were grown under identical conditions. Knowing the area of the sixth true leaf in its fully expanded state, corresponding leaves were collected from subsequently grown plants when they were 8%, 50%, or 100% of the size of the fully expanded state.
Anti-DHAR antiserum raised against DHAR purified from wheat seedlings was used for western analysis. Protein extracts were resolved using standard SDS-PAGE and the protein transferred to 0.22 µm polyvinylidene difluoride membrane by electroblotting. Following transfer, the nitrocellulose membranes were blocked in 5% milk in TPBS (0.1% Tween 20, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) followed by incubation with primary antibodies diluted typically 1:1,000 to 1:2,000 in TPBS with 1% milk for 1.5 h. The blots were then washed twice with TPBS and incubated with goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Southern Biotechnology Associates) diluted to 1:5,000 to 1:10,000 for 1 h. The blots were washed twice with TPBS and the signal detected typically between 1 to 15 min using chemiluminescence (Amersham). Each western was repeated three to four times and representative results presented. The results from the western analysis were quantitated using MicroComputer Imaging Device Elite image processing software (version 7.0, Imaging Research).
DHAR activity was assayed essentially as described (Hossain and Asada, 1984
Asc was measured as described (Foyer et al., 1983
TBARS were measured following the approach essentially described by Larkindale and Knight (2002)
Chlorophyll a and b were measured spectrophotometrically as described (Jeffrey and Humphrey, 1975
For all experiments, plants were grown under daylight conditions of approximately 500 µmol m2 s1 in the morning and 1,200 µmol m2 s1 in the afternoon. For all experiments, measurements were collected at the same time each day (between 10:30 AM and 11:30 AM) during the course of the experiment. In situ rates of CO2 assimilation, transpiration, and stomatal conductance were measured with TPS-1 portable photosynthesis system. For whole plant assays, every second leaf on a plant was measured. Each experiment was repeated two times and representative results presented.
Total nucleic acid was isolated from whole leaves using the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen). Residual genomic DNA was removed by on-column DNAse I digestion, using RQ1 RNase free DNase I (Promega). We used 0.5 µg total RNA for cDNA synthesis using Omniscript RT (Qiagen) with oligo(dT)20 as the primer. PCR reactions contained 1 µL of the RT reaction, and 1.5 µg of forward and primers in a total reaction volume of 25 µL and were performed with the following conditions: initial denaturing step, 94°C/15 min; 35 cycles of 94°C/15 s, 52°C/30 s, 72°C/60 s, and a final extension step of 72°C/5 min. PCR products were visualized on an ethidium bromide-stained 1.2% agarose gel. Primers used were: actin (X63603) forward, 5'-CGCGAAAAG-ATGACTCAAATC-39 and reverse, 5'-AGATCCTTTCTGATATCCACG-3'; tobacco CP1 (AY881011) forward, 5'-CTTTATCAGAGCAAGAGCTTG-3' and reverse, 5'-TTTTGATGCGCATATATCCAC-3'. Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers AY074784 and AY074787.
We thank Dr. Tadahiko Mae for the gift of anti-Rubisco antiserum and Dr. Bruce Kohorn for the gift of anti-LHCII antiserum Received June 20, 2006; accepted July 28, 2006; published August 4, 2006.
1 This work was supported by the National Research Initiative of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (grant no. 20023510012469) and by the University of California Agricultural Experiment Station. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Daniel R. Gallie (drgallie{at}citrus.ucr.edu). www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.085506 * Corresponding author; e-mail drgallie{at}citrus.ucr.edu; fax 9518274434.
Arrigoni O (1994) Ascorbate system in plant development. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26: 407419[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Arrigoni O, De Tullio MC (2000) The role of ascorbic acid in cell metabolism: between gene-directed functions and unpredictable chemical reactions. J Plant Physiol 157: 481488 Arrigoni O, De Tullio MC (2002) Ascorbic acid: much more than just an antioxidant. Biochim Biophys Acta 1569: 19[Medline] Asada K (1994) Mechanisms for scavenging reactive molecules generated in chloroplasts under light stress. In NR Baker, JR Bowyer, eds, Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis. From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 129142 Asada K (1999) The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 601639[CrossRef][ISI] Asada K, Takahashi M (1987) Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In DJ Kyle, CB Osmond, CJ Arntzen, eds, Photoinhibition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227287 Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248254[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Brouquisse R, Gaudillere JP, Raymond P (1998) Induction of a carbonstarvation-related proteolysis in whole maize plants submitted to light/dark cycles and to extended darkness. Plant Physiol 117: 12811291 Chen Z, Gallie DR (2004) The ascorbic acid redox state controls guard cell signaling and stomatal movement. Plant Cell 16: 11431162 Chen Z, Gallie DR (2005) Increasing tolerance to ozone by elevating foliar ascorbic acid confers greater protection against ozone than increasing avoidance. Plant Physiol 138: 16731689 Chen Z, Young TE, Ling J, Chang S-C, Gallie DR (2003) Increasing vitamin C content of plants through enhanced ascorbate recycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 35253530 Conklin PL, Norris SR, Wheeler GL, Williams EH, Smirnoff N, Last RL (1999) Genetic evidence for the role of GDP-mannose in plant ascorbic acid (vitamin C) biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 41984203 Conklin PL, Williams EH, Last RL (1996) Environmental stress sensitivity of an ascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 99709974 Davies MB, Austin J, Partridge DA (1991) Vitamin C: Its Chemistry and Biochemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge de Pinto MC, Tommasi F, De Gara L (2000) Enzymes of the ascorbate biosynthesis and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in cultured cells of tobacco Bright Yellow 2. Plant Physiol Biochem 38: 541550[CrossRef] Eskling M, Arvidsson P, Akerlund HE (1997) The xanthophyll cycle, its regulation and components. Physiol Plant 100: 806816[CrossRef] Foyer CH, Rowell J, Walker D (1983) Measurements of the ascorbate content of spinach leaf protoplasts and chloroplasts during illumination. Planta 157: 239244 Horemans N, Foyer CH, Asard H (2000) Transport and action of ascorbate at the plant plasma membrane. Trends Plant Sci 5: 263267[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Hossain MA, Asada K (1984) Purification of dehydroascorbate reductase from spinach and its characterization as a thiol enzyme. Plant Cell Physiol 25: 8592 Jeffrey SW, Humphrey GF (1975) New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae, and natural phytoplankton. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 167: 191194 Larkindale J, Knight MR (2002) Protection against heat stress-induced oxidative damage in Arabidopsis involves calcium, abscisic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid. Plant Physiol 128: 682695 Mano J (1999) Photooxidation of ascorbate on the donor side of photosystem I in the thylakoid lumen. Plant Cell Physiol (Suppl) 40: 37 Mano J, Ushimaru T, Asada K (1997) Ascorbate in thylakoid lumen as an endogenous electron donor to photosystem II: protection of thylakoids from photoinhibition and regeneration of ascorbate in stroma by dehydroascorbate reductase. Photosynth Res 53: 197204 McGarvey DJ, Christoffersen RE (1992) Characterization and kinetic parameters of ethylene-forming enzyme from avocado fruit. J Biol Chem 267: 59645967 Miyake C, Asada K (1994) Ferredoxin-dependent photoreduction of the monodehydroascorbate radical in spinach thylakoids. Plant Cell Physiol 35: 539549 Moriyasu Y, Ohsumi Y (1996) Autophagy in tobacco suspension-cultured cells in response to sucrose starvation. Plant Physiol 111: 12331241[Abstract] Muller-Moule P, Conklin PL, Niyogi KK (2002) Ascorbate deficiency can limit violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity in vivo. Plant Physiol 128: 970977 Muller-Moule P, Golan T, Niyogi KK (2004) Ascorbate-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis grow in high light despite chronic photooxidative stress. Plant Physiol 134: 11631172 Muller-Moule P, Havaux M, Niyogi KK (2003) Zeaxanthin deficiency enhances the high light sensitivity of an ascorbate-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133: 748760 Murata Y, Pei ZM, Mori IC, Schroeder J (2001) Abscisic acid activation of plasma membrane Ca(2+) channels in guard cells requires cytosolic NAD(P)H and is differentially disrupted upstream and downstream of reactive oxygen species production in abi1-1 and abi2-1 protein phosphatase 2C mutants. Plant Cell 13: 25132523 Navabpour S, Morris K, Allen R, Harrison E, A-H-Mackerness S, Buchanan-Wollaston V (2003) Expression of senescence-enhanced genes in response to oxidative stress. J Exp Bot 54: 22852292 Pei ZM, Murata Y, Benning G, Thomine S, Klusener B, Allen GJ, Grill E, Schroeder JI (2000) Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signaling in guard cells. Nature 406: 731734[CrossRef] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||