|
|
||||||||
|
First published online September 22, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.082891 Plant Physiology 142:1148-1159 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists Functional Classification, Genomic Organization, Putatively cis-Acting Regulatory Elements, and Relationship to Quantitative Trait Loci, of Sorghum Genes with Rhizome-Enriched Expression1,[W]Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory (C.S.J., T.L.K., D.N.S., S.R.S., A.H.P.) and Department of Crop and Soil Sciences (W.K.V., A.H.P.), University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
Rhizomes are organs of fundamental importance to plant competitiveness and invasiveness. We have identified genes expressed at substantially higher levels in rhizomes than other plant parts, and explored their functional categorization, genomic organization, regulatory motifs, and association with quantitative trait loci (QTLs) conferring rhizomatousness. The finding that genes with rhizome-enriched expression are distributed across a wide range of functional categories suggests some degree of specialization of individual members of many gene families in rhizomatous plants. A disproportionate share of genes with rhizome-enriched expression was implicated in secondary and hormone metabolism, and abiotic stimuli and development. A high frequency of unknown-function genes reflects our still limited knowledge of this plant organ. A putative oligosaccharyl transferase showed the highest degree of rhizome-specific expression, with several transcriptional or regulatory protein complex factors also showing high (but lesser) degrees of specificity. Inferred by the upstream sequences of their putative rice (Oryza sativa) homologs, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genes that were relatively highly expressed in rhizome tip tissues were enriched for cis-element motifs, including the pyrimidine box, TATCCA box, and CAREs box, implicating the gibberellins in regulation of many rhizome-specific genes. From cDNA clones showing rhizome-enriched expression, expressed sequence tags forming 455 contigs were plotted on the rice genome and aligned to QTL likelihood intervals for ratooning and rhizomatous traits in rice and sorghum. Highly expressed rhizome genes were somewhat enriched in QTL likelihood intervals for rhizomatousness or ratooning, with specific candidates including some of the most rhizome-specific genes. Some rhizomatousness and ratooning QTLs were shown to be potentially related to one another as a result of ancient duplication, suggesting long-term functional conservation of the underlying genes. Insight into genes and pathways that influence rhizome growth set the stage for genetic and/or exogenous manipulation of rhizomatousness, and for further dissection of the molecular evolution of rhizomatousness.
Rhizomes are organs of fundamental importance to plant competitiveness and invasiveness, playing two contrasting roles in agricultural ecology. As a primary means of dispersal, rhizomes are an essential component of "weediness" for many of our most noxious weeds, including Sorghum halepense L. Pers. (Johnsongrass), Cynodon dactylon L. Pers. (bermudagrass), and Cyperus spp. (nutsedge). S. halepense and C. dactylon were introduced to the United States as prospective crops but became major weeds, largely due to their aggressive rhizomes. The threat of other such escapes restricts improvement of several crops. For example, the rhizomatous grasses Oryza longistaminata (sexually compatible with rice [Oryza sativa]) and Saccharum spontaneum (sexually compatible with sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum]) harbor many genes of potential value for improving rice and sugarcane, respectively. They cannot, however, be legally grown in the United States due to the threat of their becoming weedy escapes.
By contrast, rhizomes are advantageous in establishment and persistence of dense, productive stands of forage and turfgrasses, including Cynodon spp. (bermudagrass), Paspalum spp. (bahia and dallisgrass), Pennisetum/Cenchrus spp. (buffelgrass), and many others. Such grasses are cultivated on more than 60 million acres in the southern United States alone (Burton, 1989
Botanically, rhizomes are modified subterranean stems that are diageotropic (i.e. orient their growth perpendicular to the force of gravity; Gizmawy et al., 1985
Several lines of evidence suggest that an overlapping set of genes may account for much of the genetic variation in growth and development of rhizomes across diverse taxa. We have previously reported on the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible for several aspects of rhizome growth, in a cross between cultivated Sorghum bicolor L. Moench and a rhizomatous relative Sorghum propinquum (Paterson et al., 1995
Little is known of the molecular mechanisms related to initiation and elongation of rhizomes, although several well-described gene functions associated with tillering mechanisms in the Poaceae may also have some relevance to rhizomes. For example, a putative bHLH transcription factor, teosinte branched1, accounts partly for morphological differences in axillary branching between maize and teosinte (Hubbard et al., 2002 We have sampled the population of genes that are highly expressed in rhizomes relative to other plant parts, and have explored this sample for functions, genomic organization, regulatory motifs, and proximity to QTLs conferring rhizomatousness. We have compared these genes to random surveys of the rhizotranscriptome in S. halepense and S. propinquum. Insight into genes and pathways that influence rhizome growth set the stage for genetic and/or exogenous manipulation of rhizomatousness, and for further dissection of the molecular evolution of rhizomatousness.
Isolation of Rhizome-Enriched Genes Two cDNA libraries derived from the rhizome tip (RT; distal 1 cm of the young rhizome) tissues of S. halepense (pSH) and S. propinquum (pSP), respectively, were studied. A total of 18,432 clones per library were analyzed by hybridizations of macroarrays with labeled cDNAs from RT, mature rhizome internodes (RMI), and pooled aboveground (AG) tissues. Relative expression levels of the cDNA clones ranged from 6.33 to 0.40 normalized units, with a mean value of 1.00 in all tissues (Table I ). For each of the two clone sets, expression levels in RT and RMI were correlated (r = 0.51, 061 for pSH and pSP, respectively). Expression levels in RT more closely resembled AG (r = 0.41, 0.34) than did RMI (r = 0.30, 0.30).
Based on the relative expression levels of RT versus RMI (RT/RMI) and AG (RT/AG) tissues, 192 clones (approximately 1%) with the highest ratios from each library were selected as candidate rhizome-enriched genes. Selected as negative controls were 48 clones (approximately 0.3%) with the lowest ratios from each library (Table II ). Of the 768 selected candidate rhizome-enriched genes, 71 (9%) clones with high RT/RMI ratios also had high RT/AG ratios. The resulting 697 unique cDNA clones from putatively rhizome-enriched genes and 192 controls were sequenced from both ends. Assembly with phred and phrap produced 343 and 393 sequences from the pSP and pSH libraries, respectively (accession nos. DN551694DN551965, DN552280DN552796). Phrap assembly using both libraries formed a 534-member set of nonoverlapping sequences.
We also included in our analysis sequences from a prior study (Y. Si and A.H. Paterson, unpublished data), in which differential display (DD; Liang and Pardee, 1992
A set of 2,616 sequence contigs composed of randomly selected expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from S. halepense (rhiz1 = pSH) and S. propinquum (rhiz2 = pSP) libraries were downloaded from the Comparative Grass Genomics Center database (ftp://cggc.agtec.uga.edu/SorghumUnigene/fasta_file/) for comparisons to differentially expressed rhizome genes. All sequences with a significant match in the plant and/or embryophyta databases were divided into 15 categories based on their putative biochemical and physiological roles (Table III ). For all clone sources, the "unknown function" category, composed of sequences with no significant hit to the plant protein database but a significant match to non-self sequences in the embryophyta database, was the most abundant. Curiously, a significantly higher fraction of the randomly selected rhizome EST sequences showed unknown function than all differentially expressed groups.
Among functional categories, there was striking and statistically significant enrichment of genes involved with secondary and hormone metabolism in the high RT/AG group, and protein synthesis and processing in the low RT/RMI selected group. Genes related to abiotic stimuli and development were significantly enriched in high RT/RMI relative to low RT/RMI and to the random set, but both high and low RT/AG resembled high RT/RMI.
Genes showing the 50 highest expression levels in RT relative to RMI and AG tissues are described in Supplemental Tables S1 (RT/RMI) and S2 (RT/AG), respectively. (The corresponding genes with the lowest expression ratios are described in Supplemental Table S3.) The pSH clone identified as c083, encoding a putative oligosaccharyl transferase (STT3), showed the highest relative expression ratios in both RT/RMI (6.66) and RT/AG (8.48) treatments. Several high RT/RMI and/or high RT/AG expression candidates corresponded to transcriptional or regulatory protein complex factors. Five candidates (and their putative protein products), c298 (zinc-finger [DHHC-type] family protein), c110 (ribosomal protein S11), c243 (nuclear RNA-binding protein), c171 (mitogen-activated protein kinase), and c257 (26S proteasome regulatory particle triple-A ATPase subunit), map to QTL interval QRn5; AQDK006 and QRl7; sorghum regrowth on LG-C (chromosome 1) corresponding to rice chromosome 1; and the latter two to RAAB CQE43 on rice chromosome 6, respectively. A total of 10 other possible transcription factors did not show significant sequence homology with rice or were located outside rhizome-related QTL regions. The clone set selected based on relative expression ratio data was compared to pSHR clones isolated by DD (Y. Si and A.H. Paterson, unpublished data) and their derived sequences using the local BLASTn program. Ten pSHR clones (approximately 13%) showed significant homology (E < 1025) with macroarray-selected genes: five high RT/RMI (c155, c179 twice, c202, and s177), four high RT/AG (c121, c328, and s021 twice), and, curiously, one low RT/RMI (s010). The relatively low 13% match between the two clone sets, although much higher than would be expected if each method were randomly sampling the transcriptome, probably reflects differences related to the methods; in particular, DD-PCR may be more sensitive to identification of differentially expressed low-abundance transcripts. The incongruous low RT/RMI clone is not especially surprising in that the pSHR clones were selected based on DD-PCR products present from a mRNA pool including both mature rhizomes and tips but absent from rhizome-derived shoots. Five of the 10 matching clones showed significant homology with genes deposited in the plant protein database, e.g. cytochrome P450, ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, lipase class 3 family protein, and Golgi-associated protein se-wap41 (two matches).
A total of 453 of the 609 unique sequences (330 high RT/RMI and/or RT/AG, 79 low RT/RMI and/or RT/AG, and eight pSHR and 36 pSHR derived) could be plotted on the rice pseudomolecules and aligned with genetically defined intervals of sorghum (Fig. 1 ; Supplemental Fig. S1). The rhizome-derived cDNA sequences were widely distributed throughout the genome, showing no obvious bias correlating with either the species or differential expression.
Comparison of Putative cis-Acting Regulatory Elements To compare putative cis-acting regulatory elements between genes expressed at high and low levels in RT, 1-kb upstream regions from the ATG translation start site were retrieved from the rice pseudomolecules. Putative upstream promoter regions could be retrieved for 395 loci, including 153 high RT/RMI, 24 low RT/RMI, 148 high RT/AG, 31 low RT/AG, and 39 pSHR. Using the PLACE database, about 70,985 candidate cis-acting regulatory elements were identified from both strands of the 395 kb of putative promoter sequences. The average number of each type of cis-acting regulatory elements from each class of genes was calculated. Because some promoter regions have many copies of one type of cis-acting regulatory element, we further categorized elements found in two or more copies per gene, only one copy per gene, or absent. Elements found in significantly different proportions between treatments are shown in Table IV .
Three cis-acting regulatory elements, the pyrimidine box (CCTTTT), the TATCCA box (TATCCA), and the I box (GATAAG), showed significantly higher abundance in high RT/RMI than low RT/RMI. In particular, the pyrimidine box (Mena et al., 2002
In the comparison of high and low RT/AG, two cis-acting regulatory elements, CArG motif-binding MADS domain proteins (Tang and Perry, 2003
The promoters of pSHR genes were enriched relative to the other gene sets for two cis-elements, NC II known as a plastid atpB gene promoter (Kapoor and Sugiura, 1999
The proximity of genes with rhizome-enriched expression to QTLs that explain genetic variation in rhizomatousness provides one means by which to prioritize candidates for further study. Using genetic markers previously described (Hu et al., 2003
A comprehensive assessment (Supplemental Table S4) shows highly expressed rhizome genes to be slightly enriched in the rice rhizome QTL likelihood intervals of Hu et al. (2003) Of special interest are cases in which genes that were differentially expressed in rhizomes also mapped to QTL likelihood intervals. Two of the five annotated candidates with the greatest RT/RMI ratios could be associated with QTL intervals. The putative oligosaccharyl transferase identified as c083, showing the highest relative expression ratios in both RT/RMI (6.66) and RT/AG (8.48), failed to map to The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) release 2 pseudomolecules but could be located to the QRn5 likelihood interval using TIGR release 3 rice assembly. c087, with a RT/RMI ratio of 2.70 and a high RT/AG ratio of 2.59, maps to the rice chromosome 4 RAAB AQDK002 locus with correspondence to sorghum QTLs for rhizomatousness, seedling tillers, and regrowth traits. Among the five clones with the highest RT/AG ratios, three located to rhizomatous QTL intervals, including c083 as described above. Candidate s036, with RT/AG expression ratio of 3.38 and encoding a putative monosaccharide transporter, locates to the rice Rhiz3 QTL likelihood interval on rice chromosome 4 and corresponding sorghum LG-D (chromosome 6) QTLs affecting subterranean rhizomatousness, regrowth, and seedling tillers. The comparative map infers that s125, a putative AER-encoding gene, is also found within this sorghum LG-D/chromosome 6 QTL interval. An interesting candidate not shown in Supplemental Table S2 because of its more moderate (1.76) RT/RMI expression ratio is c272, which gave a best BLASTx match to the maize and wheat (Triticum aestivum) GAI gene orthologs. The best hit location on the rice chromosome 3 pseudomolecule, between markers ORS31 and RM55, does not show clear association with any rhizome trait QTL; however, the second best hit was located within the QRl1 locus (rhizome length traits) and the corresponding sorghum QTL for regrowth.
The discovery that rice is a paleopolyploid (Paterson et al., 2003
We found correspondence between rice QTLs located on ancient duplicated segments of rice chromosomes 2 and 4 and rice chromosomes 2 and 6, together with the corresponding regions of the sorghum genome (Fig. 2
). In the first case, the rice QRbn2 QTL for rhizome number per plant on chromosome 2 and a region on chromosome 4 affecting several measures of rhizomatousness, as well as tillering and ratooning ability, correspond closely to one another and also to sorghum QTLs for regrowth on sorghum chromosome 4, and regrowth, seedling tillers, and rhizomatousness on sorghum chromosome 6. Additional supporting evidence that this region harbors a conserved gene(s) responsible for tillering is provided by Feltus et al. (2006)
Whereas the central region of rice chromosome 2 is related by ancient duplication with rice chromosome 4, its more terminal region is related to the central region of rice chromosome 6 and to corresponding regions of sorghum LG-F (chromosome 4) and LG-I (chromosome 10). In the upper part of the chromosome (Fig. 2), the sorghum LG-I (chromosome 10) QTL intervals for rhizomatousness and regrowth correspond very closely to the rice chromosome 6 QRi6 and RAAB AQF082 loci. In turn, these correspond to a rice QTL for rhizome dry weight (Qrdw2) and to a sorghum LG-F (chromosome 4) rhizomatousness QTL. In the lower part of the chromosome, correspondence is found between the rice chromosome 6 RAAB CQE43 locus and the sorghum LG-F (chromosome 4) QTL interval for the regrowth trait. Because sorghum LG-I (chromosome 10) appears to bridge a rearrangement shared by rice chromosome 2 and sorghum LG-F (chromosome 4), there is also a tenuous association of the lower end of the chromosome with the sorghum LG-I (chromosome 10) rhizomatousness and regrowth QTL intervals.
We have screened the Sorghum transcriptome for genes that are differentially expressed in rhizomes, and explored their functional categorization, genomic organization, regulatory motifs, and association with QTLs conferring rhizomatousness. The relative lack of information about the rhizotranscriptome is reflected in the high abundance of rhizome-expressed genes with unknown function or no match in GenBank, especially in genes of relatively low expression levels (such as the 2,616 randomly sampled genes). We identified specific genes and motifs, general pathways, and exogenous regulatory agents that warrant further investigation as mechanisms by which to enhance turf and forage grasses and control noxious weeds, through either genetic approaches or application of exogenous growth regulators. While gene expression patterns in the two distinct regions of the rhizome that we studied were similar in many cases, expression levels in RT more closely resembled aboveground plant parts than did those of RMI. This was consistent with our expectation, in that RMI is largely a storage organ while RT and AG are actively growing.
The finding that genes with rhizome-enriched expression are distributed across a wide range of functional categories suggests some degree of specialization of individual members of many gene families, perhaps in concert with ancient duplication of the transcriptome (Paterson et al., 2003 Developmental and environmental responses of aerial and subterranean plant tissues differ in the types and/or levels of hormones and signaling proteins involved. Enrichment of the RT/AG set for genes implicated in secondary and hormone metabolism is consistent with this expectation. Similarly, the statistically significant abundance of abiotic stimuli and development genes in high RT/RMI and high RT/AG sets is consistent with the different developmental states of the respective tissues and need for response to distinctively different (aerial versus subterranean) environmental cues.
One way to prioritize rhizome-enriched candidates for further studies aimed at identifying the genetic factors determining rhizomatousness would be to select those mapping near QTLs. Building on prior evidence of correspondence between QTLs influencing rhizomatousness of rice and sorghum (Hu et al., 2003
While we recognize the hazards of building functional hypotheses based on candidate gene studies, a few such hypotheses of special merit are suggested. For instance, the Rhz3 interval between RM119 and RM274 harbors at least 201 rhizome EST-verified genes (Supplemental Table S4). Three of these were among the genes with most highly enriched rhizome expression: a monosaccharide transporter (high RT/AG), porphyromonas-type peptidyl-Arg deiminase family protein (PPAD; high RT/AG), and Another case worthy of further study is c083, encoding a putative oligosaccharyl transferase with the highest degree of rhizome-specific expression (both RT/AG and RT/RMI) among all genes studied and located near QRn5, which contributes to rhizome length and number, rhizome branching, and rhizome internode number and length.
The c173 sequence, a putative a 60S ribosomal protein L17, mapped to the QRn10 locus accounting for variation in rice rhizome number, internode number, dry weight, and length, and sorghum rhizome number, rhizomatousness, and seedling tillers (Fig. 1). The second best BLASTn hit (data not shown) locates c173 to rice chromosome 3, in a region that aligns with a sorghum QTL for height of the main culm and tillers (Lin et al., 1995
Correspondence of QTL locations between ancient duplicated chromosomal segments in both rice and sorghum suggests that the functions of key determinants of genetic variation in rhizomatousness may have been conserved over long periods of time. Most, if not all, cereal crops shared a common paleopolyploid ancestor perhaps 70 million years ago (e.g. Paterson et al., 2004
Several lines of evidence pointed to GAs as probable key regulators of rhizome gene expression and development. Rhizomes develop from axillary buds at the lowermost nodes of the erect leafy shoot of the plant. Although auxin is recognized as an inhibitor of lateral bud growth, Chatfield et al. (2000)
Members of the GRAS gene family, GAI/RGA and orthologs, play major roles in signaling of GAs. GAI/RGA are probably best known for their influence on stem elongation, a feature brought to the forefront by the dwarfed, high grain-yielding Green Revolution wheat varieties (Peng et al., 1999
Our cis-element analysis also revealed significant differences between high and low RT/AG genes for the CArG box, a DNA-binding domain recognized by MADS proteins. The MADS genes encode a family of transcription factors with well-described roles in floral development. More recent attention has been given to the expression and effect of this class of genes on angiosperm vegetative tissues. Strong correlations between gene cladistic assignment, expression patterns, and functions have been found for MADS-box genes (for review, see Becker and Theissen, 2003 In closing, the expression patterns, physical localizations, relationship to rhizome QTLs between two species, and putative cis-acting regulatory elements of rhizome-enriched genes in sorghum provide clues to shed further light on the identities of rhizome-specific genes.
cDNA Library Construction and Manipulation
Apical tips (terminal 23 cm) were dissected from freshly dug rhizomes of naturalized Sorghum halepense and field-sown Sorghum propinquum plants and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using ice-cold RNA extraction buffer containing 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 1.5% SDS, 300 mM LiCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM thiourea, and 1 mM aurintricarboxylic acid. mRNAs were isolated using the PolyATract mRNA isolation system (Promega). cDNA from S. halepense and S. propinquum was cloned into the Uni-ZAP XR vector (pSH library) and lambda ZAP II vector (pSP library), respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Stratagene), as described in further detail separately (Pratt et al., 2005
Each library was double-spot inoculated in a 2 x 2 grid pattern by a QBot (Genetix) on 22.5- x 22.5-cm nylon Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham Biosciences). Individual membranes contained 4,608 clones (i.e. clones from 12 384-well plates) with six replicates made for each of the four membranes representing a complete library. Membranes were placed on Q-trays (Genetix) containing Luria-Bertani broth with 1.5% agarose and 50 µg/mL ampicillin, incubated for 18 h at 37°C, and then subjected to alkaline lysis fixation (Nizetic et al., 1991
Three mRNA sources were studied: the apical 2 to 3 cm of RT, RMI, and AG from S. halepense. mRNAs were extracted as described above from each tissue, quantified by spectrophotometry, and 10 µg labeled using SuperScript II (Invitrogen) with 1 µg of oligo(dT)12-18 and 32P-dCTP at 6,000 Ci/mmol (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Labeled first-strand cDNA was purified using Sephadex G-50 beads (Sigma-Aldrich) and assayed by a scintillation counter for specific activity. Membranes were prehybridized for 1 h and hybridized in a solution of 35 mL containing 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Church and Gilbert, 1984
Exposed screens were scanned and signal intensity for each clone recorded by a STORM 820 PhosphorImager. Individual signal intensities as determined by ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics) reflect that of the clone and filter background resulting from aligning a 96 x 96 grid on the imaged filter such that each spot occurs within one square. Signal from each probe was subsequently normalized by dividing each individual signal by the average of the field in which each square was located (a field equals one-sixth of the entire filter area, or 1,536 clones). Normalized signal for each clone was averaged with its duplicate on the same filter, then averaged again with an additional two signal values for the same clone from a replicate hybridization using an independent mRNA extraction, labeling, and hybridization. Thus, the expression level of a given clone is based on the average of four signal values per tissue source, including both technical and biological replicates.
Clones selected on the basis of differential expression ratios (as described in text) were rearrayed into 96-well microtiter plates. Deep 96-well plates containing 1,300 µL of Luria-Bertani broth with 50 µg/mL ampicillin per well were inoculated and grown for 20 h at 37°C and 200 rpm. Plasmids were extracted using an alkaline lysis method (Marra et al., 1997
Comparative mapping was carried out by combining the genetic alignment between the Rice-IRRI RD23/Olong F2 QTL 2003 map and rhizomatous sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genomic regions (Hu et al., 2003
BLASTx, tBLASTx, and BLASTn were used for sequence similarity searches with the default matrix BLOSUM62 and cutoff E values of 1010 for BLASTx and tBLASTx and 1025 for BLASTn. Stand-alone BLASTs were performed against the NCBI plant protein and embryophyta databases (downloaded August 28, 2004). Sequences were manually grouped into 15 functional categories based on putative biochemical and physiological role(s) inferred with the Gene Ontology Consortium database (http://www.geneontology.org) obtained from querying the Perl-based Inter-ProScan Version 3.3 implementation (ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/unix/iprscan). The confidence limit for a binomial proportion (P = 95%) was used to evaluate the differences between treatments in frequencies of clones involved in each functional category.
Rice genes showing significant homology (E < e10) with selected sorghum genes were identified from the rice protein database using BLASTx. The 1-kb regions upstream from the ATG translation start site containing putative promoter sequences were retrieved by either of two methods. Sequence tags of 100 bp immediately downstream from the rice ATG start codon were manually separated and used as BLASTn queries to locate their physical addresses in TIGR release 2 rice pseudomolecules. The adjacent 1-kb sequences upstream of the identified start site were retrieved from the pseudomolecules by an in-house Perl script. For genes in which the downstream 100-bp query tag identified sequences containing introns, the upsteam 1-kb sequence was obtained by searching the TIGR rice genome annotation .1kUpstream site (http://www.tigr.org.tdb/e2kq/osa1/data_download.shtml).
To uncover putative cis-acting regulatory elements located in the promoter regions, the identified 1-kb sequences were submitted for analysis to the PLACE (http://dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE) database (Higo et al., 1999 Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers DN551694 to DN551965, DN552280 to DN552796, BQ479097, BQ479098, BQ656181 to BQ656248, and BQ789583 to BQ789587.
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
We thank Dr. Thomas Wicker for providing useful software. Received May 3, 2006; accepted September 18, 2006; published September 22, 2006.
1 This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service National Research Initiative (grant no. 013532010964 to A.H.P. and W.K.V.), the National Science Foundation (grant no. DBI0115903 to A.H.P.), and the Korean government (MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund; Korea Research Foundation grant no. KRF2004214M012004000100600 to C.S.J.).
2 These authors contributed equally to the paper.
3 Present address: Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Korea University, Anam-Dong, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136713, Korea. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Andrew H. Paterson (paterson{at}uga.edu).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.082891 * Corresponding author; e-mail paterson{at}uga.edu; fax 7065830160.
Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF (2003) Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 46494654 Barnes RF, Baylor JE (1995) Forages in a changing world. In RF Barnes, DA Miller, CJ Nelson, eds, Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture, Vol I. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp 313 Becker A, Theissen G (2003) The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 464489[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Bowers JE, Abbey C, Anderson S, Chang C, Draye X, Hoppe AH, Jessup R, Lemke C, Lennington J, Li Z, et al (2003) A high-density genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites for sorghum, as a framework for comparative structural and evolutionary genomics of tropical grains and grasses. Genetics 165: 367386 Burton GW (1989) Progress and benefits to humanity from breeding warm-season forage grasses. In DA Sleper, KH Asay, JF Pedersen, eds, Contributions from Breeding Forages and Turf Grasses. CSSA Special Publication 15. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 2129 Cai W, Morishima H (2002) QTL clusters reflect character associations in wild and cultivated rice. Theor Appl Genet 104: 12171228[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Chatfield SP, Stirnberg P, Forde BG, Leyser O (2000) The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J 24: 159169[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Church GM, Gilbert W (1984) Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 19911995 Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred II error probability. Genome Res 8: 186194 Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred I accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175185 Ezcurra I, Wycliffe P, Nehlin L, Ellerström M, Rask L (2000) Transactivation of the Brassica napus napin promoter by ABI3 requires interaction of the conserved B2 and B3 domains of ABI3 with different cis-elements: B2 mediates activation through an ABRE, whereas B3 interacts with an RY/G box. Plant J 24: 5766[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Feltus FA, Hart GE, Schertz KF, Casa AM, Brown P, Klein P, Kresovich S, Paterson AH (2006) Genetic map alignment and QTL correspondence between inter- and intra-specific Sorghum populations. Theor Appl Genet 112: 12951305[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Gan Y, Filleur S, Rahman A, Gotensparre S, Forde BG (2005) Nutritional regulation of ANR1 and other root-expressed MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 15: 113[CrossRef] Gao J, Kim SR, Chung YY, Lee JM, An G (1994) Developmental and environmental regulation of two ribosomal protein genes in tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 25: 761770[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Gizmawy I, Kigel J, Koller D, Ofir M (1985) Initiation, orientation, and early development of primary rhizomes in Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Ann Bot (Lond) 55: 343350 Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P (1998) Consed: a graphical toll for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8: 195202 Gubler F, Jacobsen JV (1992) Gibberellin-responsive elements in the promoter of a barley high-pI alpha-amylase gene. Plant Cell 4: 14351441 Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T (1999) Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 297300 Hu FY, Tao DY, Sacks E, Fu BY, Xu P, Li J, McNally K, Khush GS, Paterson AH, Li ZK (2003) Convergent evolution of perenniality in rice and sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 40504054 Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlated with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 162: 19271935 Ishimaru K, Yano M, Aoki N, Ono K, Hirose T, Lin S-Y, Monna L, Sasaki T, Ohsugi R (2001) Toward the mapping of physiological and agronomic characters on a rice function map: QTL analysis and comparison between QTLs and expressed sequence tags. Theor Appl Genet 102: 793800[CrossRef] Kader JC (1996) Lipid transfer proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 627654[CrossRef][ISI] Kapoor S, Sugiura M (1999) Identification of two essential sequence elements in the nonconsensus type II PatpB-290 plastid promoter by using plastid transcription extracts from cultured tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell 11: 17991810 Kim SH, Mizuno K, Fujimura T (2002) Isolation of MADS-box genes from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) expressed specifically in vegetative tissues. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 314322 Krakowski K, Bunville J, Seto J, Baskin D, Seto D (1995) Rapid purification of fluorescent dye-labeled products in a 96-well format for high-throughput automated DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 49304931 Li X, Qian Q, Fu Z, Wang Y, Xiong G, Zeng D, Wang X, Liu X, Teng S, Hiroshi F, et al (2003) Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422: 618621[CrossRef][Medline] Liang P, Pardee AB (1992) Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science 257: 967971 Lin YR, Schertz KF, Paterson AH (1995) Comparative-analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across the Poaceae in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics 141: 391411[Abstract] Marra MA, Kucaba TA, Dietrich NL, Green ED, Brownstein B, Wilson RK, McDonald KM, Hillier LW, McPherson JD, Waterson RH (1997) High throughput fingerprint analysis of large-inset clones. Genome Res 7: 10721084 Martinez M, Rubio-Somoza I, Carbonero P, Diaz I (2003) A cathepsin B-like cysteine protease gene from Hordeum vulgare (gene CatB) induced by GA in aleurone cells is under circadian control in leaves. J Exp Bot 54: 951959 McGraw WT, Potempa J, Farley D, Travis J (1999) Purification, characterization, and sequence analysis of a potential virulence factor from Porphyromonas gingivalis, peptidylarginine deiminase. Infect Immun 67: 32483256 Mena M, Cejudo FJ, Isabel-Lamoneda I, Carbonero P (2002) A role for the DOF transcription factor BPBF in the regulation of gibberellin-responsive genes in barley aleurone. Plant Physiol 130: 111119 Moseyko N, Zhu T, Chang HS, Wang X, Feldman LJ (2002) Transcription profiling of the early gravitropic response in Arabidopsis using high-density oligonucleotide probe microarrays. Plant Physiol 130: 720728 Nizetic D, Drmanac R, Lehrach H (1991) An improved bacterial colony lysis procedure enables direct DNA hybridization using short (10, 11 bases) oligonucleotides to cosmids. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 182 Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA (2004) Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 99039908 Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Paterson DG, Estill JC, Chapman BA (2003) Structure and evolution of cereal genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13: 644650[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Paterson AH, Schertz KF, Lin YR, Liu SC, Chang YL (1995) The weediness of wild plants: molecular analysis of genes influencing dispersal and persistence of johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 61276131 Peng J, Carol P, Richards DE, King KE, Cowling RJ, Murphy GP, Harberd NP (1997) The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses. Genes Dev 11: 31943205 Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Filntham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F, et al (1999) Green revolution genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400: 256261[CrossRef][Medline] Popescu SC, Tumer NE (2004) Silencing of ribosomal protein L3 genes in N. tabacum reveals coordinate expression and significant alterations in plant growth, development and ribosome biogenesis. Plant J 39: 2944[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Pratt LH, Liang C, Shah M, Sun F, Wang H, Reid SP, Gingle A, Paterson AH, Wing R, Dean R, et al (2005) Sorghum expressed sequence tags provide a milestone set of 16,801 clusters and identify signature genes for drought, pathogenesis and etiolation. Plant Physiol 139: 869884 Quirino BF, Reiter WD, Amasino RD (2001) One of two tandem Arabidopsis genes homologous to monosaccharide transporters is senescence-associated. Plant Mol Biol 46: 447457[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Richards DE, King KE, Ait-ali T, Harberd NP (2001) How gibberellin regulates plant growth and development: a molecular genetic analysis of gibberellin signaling. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 6788[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Schreiber L, Franke R, Lessire R (2005) Biochemical characterization of elongation activity in corn (Zea mays L.) roots. Phytochemistry 66: 131138[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Silverstone AL, Ciampaglio CN, Sun TP (1998) The Arabidopsis RGA gene encodes a transcriptional regulator repressing the gibberellin signal transduction pathway. Plant Cell 10: 155169 Sutoh K, Yamauchi D (2003) Two cis-acting elements necessary and sufficient for gibberellin-upregulated proteinase expression in rice seeds. Plant J 3: 635645 Tan ZB, Shen LS, Yuan ZL, Lu CF, Chen Y, Zhou KD, Zhu LH (1997) Identification of QTLs for ratooning ability and grain yield traits of rice and analysis of their genetic effects. Acta Agron Sin 23: 289295 Tang W, Perry SE (2003) Binding site selection for the plant MADS domain protein AGL15. J Biol Chem 278: 2815428159 |