|
|
||||||||
|
First published online February 23, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.095562 Plant Physiology 143:1861-1870 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists The Transiently Generated Nonphotochemical Quenching of Excitation Energy in Arabidopsis Leaves Is Modulated by Zeaxanthin1Heinrich Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Biochemie der Pflanzen, D40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
Upon the transition of dark-adapted plants to low light, the energy-dependent quenching (qE) of excitation energy is only transiently induced due to the only transient generation of the transthylakoid pH gradient. We investigated the transient qE (qETR) in different Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants. In dark-adapted plants, qETR was absent in the npq4 mutant (deficient in the PsbS protein) and the pgr1 mutant (restricted in lumen acidification). In comparison with wild-type plants, qETR was reduced in the zeaxanthin (Zx)-deficient npq1 mutant and increased in the Zx-accumulating npq2 mutant. After preillumination of plants (to allow the synthesis of large amounts of Zx), the formation and relaxation of qETR was accelerated in all plants (except for npq4) in comparison with the respective dark-adapted plants. The extent of qETR, however, was unchanged in npq1 and npq4, decreased in npq2, but increased in wild-type and pgr1 plants. Even in presence of high levels of Zx, qETR in pgr1 mutants was still lower than that in wild-type plants. In the presence of the uncoupler nigericin, qETR was completely abolished in all genotypes. Thus, the transient qETR shows essentially the same characteristics as the steady-state qE; it is strictly dependent on the PsbS protein and a low lumen pH, but the extent of qETR is largely modulated by Zx. These results indicate that qETR does not represent a different quenching mechanism in comparison with the steady-state qE, but simply reflects the response of qE to the dynamics of the lumen pH during light activation of photosynthesis.
Thermal dissipation of light energy serves important photoprotective functions in plant photosynthesis. Three basic mechanisms contribute to these processes: state transitions (Allen, 1992
The qT mechanism balances the excitation of the two photosystems by reversible phosphorylation of a mobile pool of light-harvesting complex II and is important under nonsaturating light intensities (Haldrup et al., 2001
The qI quenching is related to photoinhibition of photosynthesis and develops upon prolonged exposure of leaves to highly excessive light stress conditions (Krause, 1988
The qE mechanism represents the dominating NPQ component under moderate light stress conditions and is related to energy dissipation processes generated by the energization of the thylakoid membrane (Krause et al., 1982
Recently, a second type of qE quenching has been proposed, which is transiently generated during the transition of dark-adapted plants to nonsaturating light and is supposed to be related to events in the reaction center of PSII (Finazzi et al., 2004
We studied the transiently formed qE in more detail in several Arabidopsis mutants that show an altered steady-state qE and investigated the role of the lumen pH and Zx in this process. The following mutants were used: (1) the npq1 mutant (Niyogi et al., 1998
Light Dependence of NPQ Formation
The time course of NPQ formation in dependence on the light intensity is shown in Figure 1
for dark-adapted Arabidopsis plants. The dynamics of the generation and relaxation of NPQ was strongly dependent on the light intensity. At light intensities of 900 µmol photons m2 s1, which can be assumed to be sufficient to saturate photosynthetic electron transport in plants grown under 150 µmol photons m2 s1, a more or less stable steady-state value of NPQ was reached after about 300 s. This steady-state NPQ has been assigned to energy dissipation processes in the PSII antenna (Horton et al., 1996
NPQ Formation in Different NPQ Mutants
To gain more insight into the characteristics of qETR, we studied the NPQ formation in four Arabidopsis mutants, npq1, npq2, npq4, and pgr1, which have been shown to be affected in the extent and/or kinetics of NPQ formation. The qETR was nearly completely abolished in npq4 (Fig. 2
), underlining the requirement of the PsbS protein for qETR. In pgr1 plants, only a very slow rise of NPQ was detectable that was not reversible during the whole illumination period of 840 s. The generation of qETR in this mutant was obviously limited by the reduced transthylakoid pH gradient, supporting the requirement of a low lumen pH for the transient NPQ. In the Zx-deficient npq1 mutant, qETR was reduced to about 50% of the wild-type level, while in the Zx-enriched npq2 mutant, a clearly higher qETR was determined in comparison with the wild type (Fig. 2). These characteristics of qETR imply that, in addition to PsbS and a high
Vx De-Epoxidation and Electron Transport Rates during NPQ Formation
We investigated the extent and the rate of Zx formation under the same experimental conditions used for the determination of qETR. A reasonable amount of Zx was found to be formed within 1 min of illumination in wild-type and npq4 plants, but a clearly lower amount was determined in pgr1 (Table I
). As expected, no Zx was detectable in npq1, while high levels of Zx were present in npq2. These characteristics of the different genotypes were also reflected by the rates of Zx formation during the first minute of illumination; very similar values were found again for npq4 and the wild type, and no changes in the xanthophyll content were detectable for the two xanthophyll cycle mutants npq1 and npq2. In pgr1 plants, a clearly lower rate of Zx formation was found in comparison with the wild type and npq4 (Table I), which can be explained by the reduced capacity of lumen acidification in this mutant in comparison with wild-type plants due to an altered pH dependence of plastoquinol oxidation (Munekage et al., 2001
NPQ Formation after Preillumination of the Leaves To overcome a possible limitation of NPQ formation upon the transition from dark-adapted plants to low light by the rate of Zx synthesis, we investigated the characteristics of qETR after preillumination of the leaves. Leaves were illuminated for 15 min at 20°C to allow the formation of large amounts of Zx prior to the induction of qETR. Subsequently, leaves were redarkened to allow the relaxation of the transthylakoid pH gradient without substantial reconversion of Zx back to Vx. Redarkening for 15 min was found to be sufficient to recover the maximum extent of qETR after 15 min preillumination (data not documented) so that a redarkening of 15 min was used for the following experiments. We studied the extent of Vx de-epoxidation in wild-type plants at the end of the dark incubation in dependence on the light intensity during preillumination (Table II ). The de-epoxidation state (DEPS) of the xanthophyll cycle pigments, defined as (Zx + 0.5 Ax)/(Vx + Ax + Zx), was found to reach values in the range from about 42% (at 300 µmol photons m2 s1) to about 54% (at 2,000 µmol photons m2 s1). In parallel, we determined the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII in the dark-adapted state (FV/FM) after this pretreatment to estimate a possible reduction of the PSII quantum efficiency during the illumination period (Table II). Only a slight reduction of the PSII quantum efficiency was detectable up to 1,000 µmol photons m2 s1. At 2,000 µmol photons m2 s1, however, the reduction was clearly more pronounced (Table II).
We further determined the dynamics of the NPQ under these conditions (Fig. 3 ). Preillumination of leaves had two different consequences on the qETR in wild-type plants. First, both the kinetics of NPQ formation and relaxation were accelerated by a factor of about 3 in comparison with dark-adapted samples (Fig. 3). The transient maximum of NPQ was reached after about 30 s in preilluminated leaves, and the major portion of NPQ was relaxed after 120 s. Second, the extent of NPQ was increased in comparison with dark-adapted plants. Notably, the maximal extent of the qETR after preillumination matched the value of the qETR determined for dark-adapted npq2 mutants (compare with Fig. 2). The maximal increase of qETR and the fastest kinetics of qETR formation were observed after preillumination at 1,000 µmol photons m2 s1, as visible from the differences of the NPQ induction curves with and without preillumination (Fig. 3B). At the highest light intensity of 2,000 µmol photons m2 s1, the extent of qETR was even slightly reduced in comparison with the other light intensities (Fig. 3). This reduction could be based on photoinhibitory processes evolving already during this short illumination period (compare with Table II). It should be noted that the nearly maximal increase of qETR was already observable after preillumination at 300 µmol photons m2 s1, although the DEPS was significantly lower than at the two highest light intensities. This implies that a DEPS of roughly 40% is sufficient to induce the maximal qETR. For further experiments, we used a light intensity of 1,000 µmol photons m2 s1 during preillumination to allow the most pronounced acceleration of NPQ formation and to avoid any adverse effect on PSII activity at higher light intensities.
The effect of preillumination on qETR in the different mutant plants is summarized in Table III and Figure 4 . In all genotypes, the PSII quantum efficiency was slightly reduced by the preillumination treatment, with the most pronounced reduction occurring in npq2 (Table III). The DEPS after preillumination, on the other hand, was found to be similar in wild type (46.3%) and npq4 (46.7%) but somewhat reduced in pgr1 (35.7%), while no changes in the DEPS were detectable for the two xanthophyll cycle mutants npq1 and npq2 (Table III). In general, an acceleration of NPQ formation was induced by preillumination in all genotypes except npq4, which showed no NPQ formation at all. Very similar to the wild type, the relaxation of qETR was accelerated by the preillumination treatment in the mutants (Fig. 4B). Like in wild-type plants, the maximum qE was induced after about 30 s in preilluminated mutant plants, but each of the mutant plants showed specific characteristics of the NPQ transient. In npq1 plants, light-induced acceleration of NPQ formation was not accompanied by an increase of the extent of qETR. Obviously, the acceleration of qETR formation is not (or not only) simply an effect of Zx accumulation, but rather reflects changes induced by the light activation of the chloroplast. In pgr1 plants, preillumination induced the appearance of a pronounced qETR (Fig. 4A), which was not observable in dark-adapted plants (Figs. 2 and 4B). Most likely, the formation of large amounts of Zx (Table III) prior to NPQ induction was responsible for this behavior. The still lower extent of qETR in pgr1 in comparison with the wild type (Fig. 4A) can be explained by the lower transthylakoid pH gradient in the mutant. An acceleration of qETR due to preillumination was also found in npq2, underlining again the Zx-independent light activation of the leaves as observed for npq1 plants. The reason for the significant reduction of the extent of qETR upon preillumination of npq2 plants from about 1.3 in dark-adapted plants (Fig. 2) to about 1.0 in preilluminated plants (Fig. 4A) is unclear. Possibly, the more pronounced reduction of the PSII quantum efficiency after preillumination in this mutant (Table II) can account for this phenomenon.
Nevertheless, the increase of qETR in preilluminated wild-type plants to the level of dark-adapted npq2 plants (Fig. 2) indicates that the generation of qETR in dark-adapted wild-type plants (Fig. 2) was indeed limited by the rate of Zx synthesis. On the other hand, the complete absence of the transient qETR in preilluminated npq4 plants clearly shows that qETR is essentially dependent on the presence of the PsbS protein. The still-reduced magnitude of qETR in pgr1 and npq1 plants in comparison with the wild type can then be understood by the regulation of qETR by both the transthylakoid pH gradient (partly reduced in pgr1) and Zx (completely absent in npq1). The still-detectable qETR in npq1 plants thus represents a Zx-independent portion of qETR, while the difference between the NPQ transients of wild-type and npq1 plants (Fig. 4C) refers to the portion of qETR that is modulated by Zx.
We further investigated the role of the
Our data provide clear evidence that the qETR, which is generated upon the transition of dark-adapted leaves to low light, is modulated by Zx. This conclusion can be derived from the following specific features of qETR in comparison with the qETR in dark-adapted wild-type plants: (1) the reduced qETR in the Zx-deficient npq1 mutant; (2) the increased qETR in the Zx-accumulating npq2 mutant; (3) the increased and accelerated qETR in preilluminated wild-type plants; and (4) the reduced qETR in the presence of DTT. These results are in line with the proposed role of epoxidized xanthophylls in qETR (D'Haese et al., 2004 Independent of these discrepancies, we have to conclude from our data that qETR shows identical characteristics to the steady-state qE formed at saturating light intensities; it is strictly dependent on the presence of the PsbS protein and a transthylakoid pH gradient and is modulated dependent on the amount of de-epoxidized xanthophylls. Therefore, it is very unlikely that qETR represents a specific quenching process in the reaction center of PSII but rather reflects the response of the antenna-related qE to the dynamics of the lumen pH during the induction of photosynthesis upon illumination of dark-adapted plants.
The comparison of the dynamics of NPQ in dark-adapted and preilluminated wild-type plants (Fig. 3B) showed that the kinetics of NPQ formation is significantly accelerated after preillumination of leaves. Our data further indicated that preillumination has at least two distinct effects on NPQ transients at low light intensities. First, it provides the formation of large amounts of Zx, and, second, it leads to the light activation of the chloroplast. The pronounced acceleration of NPQ formation after preillumination in comparison with dark-adapted plants is obviously not only related to the light-induced formation of large amounts of Zx because the Zx-deficient npq1 mutant and the Zx-enriched npq2 mutant also showed the same acceleration as the wild type. Thus, only the magnitude of qETR seems to be modified by the Zx content or the DEPS, while the kinetics of NPQ formation may be determined by the rate of lumen acidification. The more rapid lumen acidification in preilluminated plants can then be understood by the light activation of photosynthetic electron transport. It is known from earlier work that the kinetics of the induction of photosynthetic carbon assimilation (and thus of electron transport) and also of Chl fluorescence is strongly dependent on the preillumination of leaves (e.g. van der Veen, 1951
This interpretation is also supported by the results obtained with the pgr1 mutant. In dark-adapted plants, qE formation is strongly retarded in pgr1 (Fig. 2) due to the limited capacity of lumen acidification (Jahns et al., 2002
The crucial role of the rate of lumen acidification for the kinetics of NPQ formation is also obvious from the data obtained with npq2 plants. Strikingly, NPQ formation in dark-adapted and preilluminated plants seemed to be slightly slower (but definitely not faster) in npq2 when compared with the wild type (Figs. 2 and 4), although maximal amounts of Zx are present in npq2 under all conditions. The even slower rate of NPQ formation in npq2 might reflect the less efficient utilization of absorbed light energy due to sustained heat dissipation of excitation energy (Kalituho et al., 2007
In general, the relaxation of qETR in dark-adapted leaves was rather slow in all genotypes (Fig. 2). Only about 50% of the amplitude of NPQ relaxed within about 5 min of illumination in wild-type plants, while the relaxing portion was even lower in npq1 and npq2. Due to the strict dependence of NPQ on the lumen pH, this slow relaxation must be understood as a slow rate of proton consumption upon the dark-to-light transition of dark-adapted plants at a light intensity of 100 µmol photons m2 s1. For Arabidopsis wild-type plants, similar kinetics of NPQ relaxation have been determined by Finazzi et al. (2004)
Notably, NPQ relaxation was found to be strongly accelerated by preillumination. In preilluminated wild-type and npq1 plants, the major portion of qE was reversible within 120 s after onset of illumination. Obviously, preillumination led to the activation of proton-consuming reactions in these two genotypes, most likely by light activation of the ATP synthase. The only very slowly relaxing portion of qETR in these two genotypes, on the other hand, may be related to a residual small transthylakoid pH gradient that is permanently present under these experimental conditions. The generally slower relaxation of qETR in preilluminated pgr1 and npq2 plants has then to be explained by the generally reduced proton consumption in these two mutants. It is reasonable to assume that the lower electron transport rates in these mutants account for these differences. Either light activation of ATP synthesis is limited in pgr1 and npq2, or the light-induced
Although the specific role of Zx in energy dissipation is still under discussion (Holt et al., 2005
The residual Zx-independent qE that is detectable in npq1 plants from Arabidopsis has been shown to vary from about 10% to 20% (Niyogi et al., 1998
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Columbia-0 plants were grown in soil at a light intensity of 150 µmol photons m2 s1 and a constant temperature of 20°C under long-day conditions (14 h light/10 h dark). The following mutants were used: npq1 and npq2 (Niyogi et al., 1998
Room temperature Chl a fluorescence was measured under in vivo conditions at 20°C using a pulse-amplitude-modulated fluorometer (PAM 101, Walz). For quenching analyses, leaves were illuminated for 14 min at indicated intensities of white actinic light, followed by 10 min of dark incubation. For the determination of the induction of qE, saturating white light pulses (2,000 µmol photons m2 s1, duration 1 s) were applied every 10 s during the first 100 s of illumination, followed by seven flashes given every 20 s and six flashes every 100 s. The relaxation of qE was determined by saturating light pulses spaced 100 s during 10 min of dark incubation. Stern-Volmer type of NPQ was calculated as described by Krause and Jahns (2004)
Electron transport rates through PSII, JF, at each of the saturating light pulses during the illumination period were estimated from the quantum efficiency of PSII-driven electron transport,
For pigment analysis, leaves were frozen in liquid N2 and stored at 80°C. Pigments were extracted with acetone and quantified by reverse-phase HPLC (Färber et al., 1997
To induce the uptake of nigericin or DTT, leaf discs were vacuum infiltrated in a syringe containing 50 µM nigericin or 5 mM DTT, respectively. After infiltration, leaf discs were incubated in the same solutions for 10 min in the dark. Received January 5, 2007; accepted February 17, 2007; published February 23, 2007.
1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant nos. Ja 665/24 and SFB 663, TPB2). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Peter Jahns (pjahns{at}uni-duesseldorf.de). www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.095562 * Corresponding author; e-mail pjahns{at}uni-duesseldorf.de; fax 492118113706.
Allen JF (1992) Protein phosphorylation in regulation of photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1098: 275335[Medline] Aro E-M, Virgin I, Andersson B (1993) Photoinhibition of photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta 1143: 113134[Medline] Bellafiore S, Bameche F, Peltier G, Rochaix JD (2005) State transitions and light adaptation require chloroplast thylakoid protein kinase STN7. Nature 433: 892895[CrossRef][Medline] Bonardi V, Pesaresi P, Becker T, Schleiff E, Wagner R, Pfannschmidt T, Jahns P, Leister D (2005) Photosystem II core phosphorylation and photosynthetic acclimation require two different protein kinases. Nature 437: 11791182[CrossRef][Medline] Bukhov NG, Kopecky J, Pfündel EE, Klughammer C, Heber U (2001) A few molecules of zeaxanthin per reaction centre of photosystem II permit effective thermal dissipation of light energy in photosystem II of a poikilohydric moss. Planta 212: 739748[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Crouchman S, Ruban A, Horton P (2006) PsbS enhances nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching in the absence of zeaxanthin. FEBS Lett 580: 20532058[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] D'Haese D, Vandermeiren K, Caubergs RJ, Guisez Y, De Temmerman L, Horemans N (2004) Non-photochemical quenching kinetics during the dark to light transition in relation to the formation of antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin. J Theor Biol 227: 175186[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Dall'Osto L, Caffarri S, Bassi R (2005) A mechanism of nonphotochemical energy dissipation, independent from PsbS, revealed by a conformational change in the antenna protein CP26. Plant Cell 17: 12171232 Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (2006) Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol 172: 1121[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW, Heber U, Neimanis S, Winter K, Krüger A, Czygan F-C, Bilger W, Björkman O (1990) Inhibition of zeaxanthin formation and of rapid changes in radiationless energy dissipation by dithiothreitol in spinach leaves and chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 92: 293301 Demmig-Adams B, Winter K, Krüger A, Czygan FC (1989) Zeaxanthin and the induction and relaxation kinetics of the dissipation of excess excitation-energy in leaves in 2% O2, 0% CO2. Plant Physiol 90: 887893 Ebbert V, Adams WW, Mattoo AK, Sokolenko A, Demmig-Adams B (2005) Up-regulation of a photosystem II core protein phosphatase inhibitor and sustained D1 phosphorylation in zeaxanthin-retaining, photoinhibited needles of overwintering Douglas fir. Plant Cell Environ 28: 232240[CrossRef] Ebbert V, Demmig-Adams B, Adams WWI, Mueh KE, Staehelin LA (2001) Correlation between persistent forms of zexanthin-dependent energy dissipation and thylakoid protein phosphorylation. Photosynth Res 67: 6378[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Färber A, Young AJ, Ruban AV, Horton P, Jahns P (1997) Dynamics of xanthophyll-cycle activity in different antenna subcomplexes in the photosynthetic membranes of higher plants: the relationship between zeaxanthin conversion and nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching. Plant Physiol 115: 16091618[Abstract] Finazzi G, Johnson GN, Dallosto L, Joliot P, Wollman FA, Bassi R (2004) A zeaxanthin-independent nonphotochemical quenching mechanism localized in the photosystem II core complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 1237512380 Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 8792 Gilmore AM, Yamamoto HY (1993) Linear models relating xanthophylls and lumen acidity to non- photochemical fluorescence quenching. Evidence that antheraxanthin explains zeaxanthin-independent quenching. Photosynth Res 35: 6778[Medline] Grasses T, Pesaresi P, Schiavon F, Varotto C, Salamini F, Jahns P, Leister D (2002) The role of Delta pH-dependent dissipation of excitation energy in protecting photosystem II against light-induced damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem 40: 4149[CrossRef][ISI] Haldrup A, Jensen PE, Lunde C, Scheller HV (2001) Balance of power: a view of the mechanism of photosynthetic state transitions. Trends Plant Sci 6: 301305[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Hamel P, Olive J, Pierre Y, Wollman FA, de Vitry C (2000) A new subunit of cytochrome b(6)f complex undergoes reversible phosphorylation upon state transition. J Biol Chem 275: 1707217079 Holt NE, Zigmantas D, Valkunas L, Li XP, Niyogi KK, Fleming GR (2005) Carotenoid cation formation and the regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Science 307: 433436 Horton P (1983) Effects of changes in the capacity for photosynthetic electron transfer and photophosphorylation on the kinetics of fluorescence induction in isolated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 724: 404410 Horton P, Ruban AV, Walters RG (1996) Regulation of light harvesting in green plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 655684[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Horton P, Ruban AV, Wentworth M (2000) Allosteric regulation of the light-harvesting system of photosystem II. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 13611370[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Horton P, Wentworth M, Ruban A (2005) Control of the light harvesting function of chloroplast membranes: the LHCII-aggregation model for non-photochemical quenching. FEBS Lett 579: 42014206[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Jahns P, Graf M, Munekage Y, Shikanai T (2002) Single point mutation in the Rieske iron-sulfur subunit of cytochrome b(6)/f leads to an altered pH dependence of plastoquinol oxidation in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett 519: 99102[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Jahns P, Miehe B (1996) Kinetic correlation of recovery from photoinhibition and zeaxanthin epoxidation. Planta 198: 202210[ISI] Kalituho L, Grasses T, Graf M, Rech J, Jahns P (2006) Characterization of a nonphotochemical quenching-deficient Arabidopsis mutant possessing an intact PsbS protein, xanthophyll cycle and lumen acidification. Planta 223: 532541[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Kalituho L, Rech J, Jahns P (2007) The role of specific xanthophylls in light utilization. Planta 225: 423439[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Krall JP, Edwards GE (1992) Relationship between photosystem-II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Physiol Plant 86: 180187[CrossRef] Krause GH (1988) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol Plant 74: 566574[CrossRef] Krause GH, Jahns P (2003) Pulse amplitude modulated fluorometry and its application in plant science. In BR Green, W Parson, eds, Light Harvesting Antennas in Photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 373399 Krause GH, Jahns P (2004) Non-photochemical energy dissipation determined by chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: characterization and function. In GC Papageorgiou, Govindjee, eds, Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 463495 Krause GH, Vernotte C, Briantais J-M (1982) Photoinduced quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in intact chloroplasts and algae. Resolution into two components. Biochim Biophys Acta 679: 116124 Li X-P, Björkman O, Shih C, Grossman AR, Rosenquist M, Jansson S, Niyogi KK (2000) A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature 403: 391395[CrossRef][Medline] Li XP, Gilmore AM, Caffarri S, Bassi R, Golan T, Kramer D, Niyogi KK (2004) Regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting involves intrathylakoid lumen pH sensing by the PsbS protein. J Biol Chem 279: 2286622874 Li XP, Müller-Moule P, Gilmore AM, Niyogi KK (2002a) PsbS-dependent enhancement of feedback de-excitation protects photosystem II from photoinhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1522215227 Li XP, Phippard A, Pasari J, Niyogi KK (2002b) Structure-function analysis of photosystem II subunit S (PsbS) in vivo. Funct Plant Biol 29: 11311139[CrossRef] Munekage Y, Takeda S, Endo T, Jahns P, Hashimoto T, Shikanai T (2001) Cytochrome b(6)f mutation specifically affects thermal dissipation of absorbed light energy in Arabidopsis. Plant J 28: 351359[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Niyogi KK, Grossman AR, Björkman O (1998) Arabidopsis mutants define a central role for the xanthophyll cycle in the regulation of photosynthetic energy conversion. Plant Cell 10: 11211134 Niyogi KK, Li XP, Rosenberg V, Jung HS (2005) Is PsbS the site of non-photochemical quenching in photosynthesis? J Exp Bot 56: 375382 Okegawa Y, Tsuyama M, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T (2005) The pgr1 mutation in the Rieske subunit of the cytochrome b(6)f complex does not affect PGR5-dependent cyclic electron transport around photosystem I. J Biol Chem 280: 2833228336 Pascal AA, Liu ZF, Broess K, van Oort B, van Amerongen H, Wang C, Horton P, Robert B, Chang WR, Ruban A (2005) Molecular basis of photoprotection and control of photosynthetic light-harvesting. Nature 436: 134137[CrossRef][Medline] Pogson BJ, Rissler HM (2000) Genetic manipulation of carotenoid biosynthesis and photoprotection. Philos Trans Rl Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 13951403[CrossRef] Rintamäki E, Martinsuo P, Pursiheimo S, Aro EM (2000) Cooperative regulation of light-harvesting complex II phosphorylation via the plastoquinol and ferredoxin-thioredoxin system in chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 1164411649 Ruban AV, Horton P (1999) The xanthophyll cycle modulates the kinetics of nonphotochemical energy dissipation in isolated light-harvesting complexes, intact chloroplasts, and leaves of spinach. Plant Physiol 119: 531542 Ruban AV, Pascal AA, Robert B, Horton P (2002) Activation of zeaxanthin is an obligatory event in the regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. J Biol Chem 277: 77857789 Slovacek RE, Crowther D, Hind G (1980) Relative activities of linear and cyclic electron flows during chloroplast Co2-fixation. Biochim Biophys Acta 592: 495505[Medline] Slovacek RE, Hind G (1981) Correlation between photosynthesis and the transthylakoid proton gradient. Biochim Biophys Acta 635: 393404[Medline] Thiele A, Schirwitz K, Winter K, Krause GH (1996) Increased xanthophyll cycle activity and reduced D1 protein inactivation related to photoinhibition in two plant systems acclimated to excess light. Plant Sci 115: 237250 van der Veen R (1951) Fluorescence and induction phenomena in photosynthesis. Physiol Plant 4: 486494[Medline] Verhoeven AS, Adams WWI, Demmig-Adams B (1996) Close relationship between the state of the xanthophyll cycle pigments and photosystem II efficiency during recovery from winter stress. Physiol Plant 96: 567576[CrossRef] Walker DA (1981) Secondary fluorescence kinetics of spinach leaves in relation to the onset of photosynthetic carbon assimilation. Planta 153: 273278[CrossRef][ISI] Zarter CR, Adams WW, Ebbert V, Adamska I, Jansson S, Demmig-Adams B (2006) Winter acclimation of PsbS and related proteins in the evergreen Arctostaphylos uva-ursi as influenced by altitude and light environment. Plant Cell Environ 29: 869878[CrossRef][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||