|
|
||||||||
|
First published online January 11, 2008; 10.1104/pp.107.112185 Plant Physiology 146:916-926 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Indole-3-Acetonitrile Production from Indole Glucosinolates Deters Oviposition by Pieris rapae1,[W],[OA]Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York 14853
Like many crucifer-specialist herbivores, Pieris rapae uses the presence of glucosinolates as a signal for oviposition and larval feeding. Arabidopsis thaliana glucosinolate-related mutants provide a unique resource for studying the in vivo role of these compounds in affecting P. rapae oviposition. Low indole glucosinolate cyp79B2 cyp79B3 mutants received fewer eggs than wild type, confirming prior research showing that indole glucosinolates are an important oviposition cue. Transgenic plants overexpressing epithiospecifier protein, which shifts glucosinolate breakdown toward nitrile formation, are less attractive to ovipositing P. rapae females. Exogenous application of indol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate breakdown products to cyp79B2 cyp79B3 mutants showed that oviposition was increased by indole-3-carbinol and decreased by indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN). P. rapae larvae tolerate a cruciferous diet by using a gut enzyme to redirect glucosinolate breakdown toward less toxic nitriles, including IAN, rather than isothiocyanates. The presence of IAN in larval regurgitant contributes to reduced oviposition by adult females on larvae-infested plants. Therefore, production of nitriles via epithiospecifier protein in cruciferous plants, which makes the plants more sensitive to generalist herbivores, may be a counter-adaptive mechanism for reducing oviposition by P. rapae and perhaps other crucifer-specialist insects.
Crucifers and other plants in the order Caparales have an effective chemical defense that requires the hydrolysis of glucosinolates by myrosinase (β-thioglucoside glucohydrolase [TGG]; EC 3.2.1.147), leading to the formation of breakdown products that deter herbivory (for review, see Grubb and Abel, 2006
Glucosinolates are produced constitutively in cruciferous plants, but their degradation is strictly regulated by the spatial separation of glucosinolates and myrosinase in the plant. Upon tissue rupture, myrosinase enzymes cleave glucosinolates, producing unstable thiohydroxamate-O-sulfonates, which can be broken down further to produce a wide variety of insect-deterrent compounds. The epithiospecifier protein (ESP) interacts with myrosinase and directs glucosinolate breakdown toward the formation of nitriles and epithionitriles at the expense of the generally more toxic isothiocyanates (Lambrix et al., 2001
Natural variation in Arabidopsis sensitivity to feeding by the generalist Trichoplusia ni is strongly influenced by the presence or absence of ESP in the land races Columbia-0 (Col-0) and Landsberg erecta (Ler; Jander et al., 2001
By avoiding oviposition on plants that are previously infested, adult female Lepidoptera can help to ensure that sufficient food will be available for their offspring. Both P. rapae and the closely related Pieris brassicae oviposit less readily on plants with feeding larvae (Rothschild and Schoonhoven, 1977
P. rapae commonly infest weedy crucifers such as cabbage and Arabidopsis (formerly Arabis) lyrata (Mitchell-Olds, 2001
Although there is evidence that ovipositing P. rapae females are stimulated by indole glucosinolates (Huang and Renwick, 1993
Oviposition by P. rapae Is Dependent on Indole Glucosinolates
Three-week-old wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis plants were used in a 24-h choice test to investigate the in vivo role of indole glucosinolates in the oviposition response of P. rapae. Female P. rapae deposit eggs individually on the leaf surface (Fig. 2A
), allowing relative plant attractiveness to be assessed by counting eggs. Compared to wild-type plants, the low indole glucosinolate mutant (cyp79B2 cyp79B3) received significantly fewer eggs (Fig. 3A
), indicating an in vivo role for indole glucosinolates in triggering oviposition by female P. rapae. Absence of camalexin, the major Arabidopsis phytoalexin, in cyp79B2 cyp79B3 mutants (Glazebrook and Ausubel, 1994
P. rapae Oviposition Is Reduced by ESP Activity
Because it seemed likely that P. rapae would encounter glucosinolate breakdown products rather than intact glucosinolates on the leaf surface, where there is also expression of both myrosinase and ESP (Andreasson et al., 2001 Analysis of methanol leaf surface washes was used to determine what indole glucosinolate breakdown products could be perceived by ovipositing P. rapae. IAN was 13-fold more abundant in Ler surface washes, whereas I3C was 5-fold more abundant in Col-0 surface washes (Fig. 4A ). Control experiments showed increasing recovery of IAN from Col-0 leaves with wash times ranging from 5 to 20 s (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Recovery of IAN did not increase over time in 50% methanol surface washes. Spectrophotometric measurements showed very low absorption at 647 and 660 nm (chlorophyll A and B, respectively), which was not significantly different from blank controls (Supplemental Fig. S1B), indicating that there was no significant cell damage due to the methanol surface washes.
Because Ler and Col-0 plants differ in several aspects of glucosinolate biology (Kliebenstein et al., 2001
ESP modulates glucosinolate breakdown through a direct interaction with myrosinase (Burow et al., 2006a
Indole glucosinolates in damaged plant tissue undergo degradation that is independent of the TGG1 and TGG2 myrosinases (Barth and Jander, 2006
Whereas wild-type Col-0 produces I3C as the primary I3M breakdown product, plants expressing ESP produce primarily IAN (Miao and Zentgraf, 2007
In contrast to IAN addition, I3C-treated cyp79B2 cyp79B3 plants received significantly more eggs than wild-type controls, indicating that this indole glucosinolate breakdown product is attractive to female P. rapae (Fig. 5D). I3C was abundant in surface washes 24 h after spraying Arabidopsis plants with 1 mM I3C (Fig. 5E). Because this I3C concentration greatly exceeded that found in surface washes of untreated Col-0 leaves (Fig. 4A), we also tested the oviposition response of P. rapae on leaves that were treated with 100-fold less I3C. Compared to mock-treated leaves, oviposition was higher on cyp79B2 cyp79B3 leaves treated with 0.01 mM I3C (Fig. 4F), showing that, like IAN, I3C functions as an oviposition cue over a wide range of concentrations.
It was demonstrated previously that female P. rapae avoid ovipositing on plants infested with conspecific larvae (Rothschild and Schoonhoven, 1977
P. rapae larvae make use of gut-specific nitrile specifier protein to direct breakdown of glucosinolates to nitriles rather than the more toxic isothiocyanates, an adaptation that results in the presence of glucosinolate-derived nitriles in larval frass (Wittstock et al., 2004
Taken together, our results lead us to propose an ecological role for nitrile formation in Arabidopsis, whereby some accessions can reduce P. rapae oviposition by modulating indole glucosinolate breakdown with ESP. Oviposition experiments with cyp79B2 cyp79B3 double mutants (Fig. 3A), which are almost completely devoid of indole glucosinolates (Zhao et al., 2002
Both a transgenic line overexpressing ESP and the ESP-producing Ler land race release more IAN in surface washes (Fig. 4, A and B) and are less attractive oviposition sites than wild-type Col-0 (Fig. 3, D and E). For as yet unknown reasons, ESP overexpression causes changes in the Arabidopsis glucosinolate profile (Burow et al., 2006b
Together, decreased oviposition on both cyp79B2 cyp79B3 and 35S:ESP plants (Fig. 3, A and E) showed that, although some indole compounds are oviposition stimulants, the nitrile breakdown products of indole glucosinolates are deterrent. This hypothesis was verified by showing that, when added to cyp79B2 cyp79B3 leaves, I3C stimulates oviposition, but IAN represses it (Fig. 5). However, neither I3C nor IAN influenced P. rapae oviposition when applied to green paper (Traynier and Truscott, 1991
I3C is less volatile than IAN, but reactions with other plant metabolites (Agerbirk et al., 1998
Assessment of leaf surface chemistry most likely occurs when Pieris butterflies drum leaves with their front tarsi prior to oviposition (Terofal, 1965
For ovipositing female Pieris, there is likely a significant selective advantage to using IAN or other nitriles as signals for avoiding plants with conspecific larvae. Prior larval feeding would have a deleterious effect on food availability, nutritional quality, and host defense responses. Compared to uninfested plants, Arabidopsis plants that were previously infested by P. rapae larvae showed increased resistance to subsequent attack by larvae of the same species (De Vos et al., 2006
Given the effects of ESP overproduction on IAN formation (Fig. 4B), the observation that P. rapae oviposition was unaffected by tgg1 tgg2 myrosinase knockout mutations (Fig. 3, F and G) was somewhat surprising. ESP activity leads to increased IAN production (Fig. 4, B and C) and reduced oviposition by P. rapae even in a tgg1 tgg2 background (Fig. 3J). Comparison of P. rapae oviposition on the cyp79B2 cyp79B3 tgg1 tgg2 and tgg1 tgg2 plants shows that the latter are significantly more attractive to adult female P. rapae (Fig. 3H). One possible explanation is that tgg1 tgg2 mutants may lack both positive and negative oviposition stimuli and that integration of these signals results in equal attractiveness for tgg1 tgg2 and Col-0 plants. Otherwise, ESP might interact with an as yet unknown thioglucosidase to modulate the breakdown of indole glucosinolates. Consistent with this hypothesis, indole glucosinolates, unlike aliphatic glucosinolates, suffer significant breakdown in macerated tissue of tgg1 tgg2 mutants (Barth and Jander, 2006
The apparent paradox of Arabidopsis producing I3C, a compound that promotes P. rapae herbivory, can be explained if ovipositing P. rapae are taking advantage of a defense system to which their own larvae are resistant but which deters other potential herbivores and pathogens. I3C is derived directly from indolylmethylisothiocyanate (Fig. 1), and isothiocyanate production generally contributes to herbivore and pathogen resistance in crucifers (Donkin et al., 1995
Genetic variation in the foliar glucosinolate content of naturalized populations of Arabidopsis (Mauricio, 1998
Given that isothiocyanates are generally more toxic to insects than nitriles, it is perhaps surprising that ESP production is maintained in many isolates of Arabidopsis and other crucifers. Although the avoidance of IAN by ovipositing P. rapae can select for continued nitrile production, this is unlikely the only environmental cue that favors ESP expression. Additional natural selection that could account for the continued nitrile production by cruciferous plants includes: (1) IAN inhibits the growth of some phytopathogenic fungi (Pedras et al., 2002
Plant Growth and Insect Rearing
Seeds of wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) land races Col-0 and Ler were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (www.arabidopsis.org). Col-0 transgenic lines overexpressing ESP (line 37.3; Burow et al., 2006b
Seeds were kept in 0.1% Phytagar (Invitrogen) for 24 h at 4°C prior to planting on Cornell mix (Landry et al., 1995 A colony of Pieris rapae (kind gift of M. del Campo, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) was maintained on cabbage (Brassica oleracea) plants var. Wisconsin Golden Acre (Seedway) under the same growth chamber conditions as those used for raising Arabidopsis. Adults were provided weekly with 50-mL solutions of 10% honey and 20% Suc.
Arabidopsis crosses were performed as described by Weigel and Glazebrook (2002)
Fresh leaves (approximately 0.5 g) were harvested from Col-0, Ler, cyp79B2 cyp79B3, 35S:ESP, and EV plants and immediately dipped into 2 mL of 100% methanol for 20 s, while keeping the cut petiole out of the solution. IAN was identified by HPLC with a UV (280 nm) and a fluorescence detector (excitation 275 nm, emission 350 nm). To test whether the leaves were damaged during these surface washes, IAN levels were observed after leaf dips of 5, 10, 15, and 20 s in either 50% or 100% methanol. In addition, chlorophyll A (647 nm) and B (660 nm) were detected photospectrophotometrically in the leaf surface washes. Intact glucosinolates were extracted as described by Kim and Jander (2007)
Third- and fourth-instar P. rapae larvae were starved for 10 h and subsequently allowed to feed from Arabidopsis Col-0 and cyp79B2 cyp79B3 plants. Fresh frass and regurgitant, collected into 100% methanol by applying moderate pressure onto larvae using flexible forceps, were processed immediately. IAN in frass and regurgitant was identified by comparing the HPLC retention time and absorption using a fluorescence detector (excitation 275 nm, emission 350 nm) with that of commercially available IAN.
Oviposition response experiments with P. rapae were always performed in a paired setup, where the Arabidopsis lines being compared were grown together at the same time in the same pot. One fertilized female P. rapae was provided four plants (two of each genotype) for 24 h in a 45- x 45- x 45-cm cage. Host preference was assessed by counting the number of eggs laid in 24 h. For Ler plants, which have morphological differences relative to Col-0, attractiveness was assessed using a detached-leaf assay. An equal leaf area (0.75 cm2) of each genotype being compared was mounted on the top a 200-mL Erlenmeyer flask with Parafilm (Alcan Packaging; Fig. 2B). Subsequently, these flasks were transferred to a cage with approximately 25 female P. rapae for 3 h. Oviposition preference was determined by counting the number of eggs deposited on the Erlenmeyer flask around leaf material. Both experimental setups give similar results for a comparison between Col-0 and cyp79B2 cyp79B3. The same experimental setup was used to determine the effect of larval regurgitant on oviposition. Leaves of the low indole glucosinolate mutant cyp79B2 cyp79B3 were treated with 2 µL of freshly collected regurgitate. Oviposition preference was determined by counting eggs after 3 h. To assess the attractiveness of I3C and IAN, cyp79B2 cyp79B3 plants were sprayed with 1 mM I3C, 0.01 mM I3C, 1 mM IAN, 0.01 mM IAN, or 80% methanol solvent control, and the number of eggs after 24 h was used as a measure of the attractiveness to adult female P. rapae.
All results of choice experiments were tested for statistical significance in a paired t test (
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
We thank M. del Campo for providing a P. rapae colony, U. Wittstock, M. Burow, J. Celenza, and J. Bender for Arabidopsis seed stocks; A. Renwick, J. Thaler, and M. del Campo for useful comments and suggestions; and John Ramsey, Minsang Lee, and Jae Hak Kim for their technical assistance. Received October 31, 2007; accepted December 31, 2007; published January 11, 2008.
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. IOS–0718733 and DBI–0500550 to G.J.), by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (award to M.d.V.), and by a fellowship to K.L.K. from C. Sampson. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Georg Jander (gj32{at}cornell.edu).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.112185 * Corresponding author; e-mail gj32{at}cornell.edu.
Agerbirk N, Müller C, Olsen CE, Chew FS (2006) A common pathway for metabolism of 4-hydroxybenzylglucosinolate in Pieris and Anthocaris (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Biochem Syst Ecol 34: 189–198[CrossRef][Web of Science] Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Sorensen H (1998) Initial and final products, nitriles and ascorbigens produced in myrosinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of indole glucosinolates. J Agric Food Chem 46: 1563–1571[CrossRef][Web of Science] Agrawal AA, Kurashige NS (2003) A role for isothiocyanates in plant resistance against the specialist herbivore Pieris rapae. J Chem Ecol 29: 1403–1415[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Andreasson E, Bolt Jorgensen L, Hoglund AS, Rask L, Meijer J (2001) Different myrosinase and idioblast distribution in Arabidopsis and Brassica napus. Plant Physiol 127: 1750–1763 Barth C, Jander G (2006) Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense. Plant J 46: 549–562[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bartlet E, Blight MM, Williams IH (1993) The responses of the cabbage seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis) to the odor of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and to some volatile isothiocyanates. Entomol Exp Appl 68: 295–302[CrossRef] Blaakmeer A, Hagenbeek D, Van Beek TA, De Groot A, Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon JJA (1994) Plant response to eggs vs. host marking pheromone as factors inhibiting oviposition by Pieris brassicae. J Chem Ecol 20: 1657–1665[CrossRef][Web of Science] Brown PD, Tokuhisa JG, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J (2003) Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 62: 471–481[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Bruinsma M, Van Dam NM, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2007) Jasmonic acid-induced changes in Brassica oleracea affect oviposition preference of two specialist herbivores. J Chem Ecol 33: 655–668[CrossRef][Medline] Burow M, Bergner A, Gershenzon J, Wittstock U (2007) Glucosinolate hydrolysis in Lepidium sativum: identification of the thiocyanate-forming protein. Plant Mol Biol 63: 49–61[Medline] Burow M, Markert J, Gershenzon J, Wittstock U (2006a) Comparative biochemical characterization of nitrile-forming proteins from plants and insects that alter myrosinase-catalysed hydrolysis of glucosinolates. FEBS J 273: 2432–2446[CrossRef][Medline] Burow M, Müller R, Gershenzon J, Wittstock U (2006b) Altered glucosinolate hydrolysis in genetically engineered Arabidopsis thaliana and its influence on the larval development of Spodoptera littoralis. J Chem Ecol 32: 2333–2349[CrossRef][Medline] Burow M, Zhang ZY, Ober JA, Lambrix VM, Wittstock U, Gershenzon J, Kliebenstein DJ (2008) ESP and ESM1 mediate indol-3-acetonitrile production from indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate in Arabidopsis. Phytochemistry (in press) De Vos M, Van Oosten VR, Van Poecke RMP, Van Pelt JA, Pozo MJ, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, Métraux J-P, Van Loon LC, Dicke M, et al (2005) Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18: 923–937[Web of Science][Medline] De Vos M, Van Zaanen W, Koornneef A, Korzelius JP, Dicke M, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2006) Herbivore-induced resistance against microbial pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142: 352–363 Donkin SG, Eiteman MA, Williams PL (1995) Toxicity of glucosinolates and their enzymatic decomposition products to Caenorhabditis elegans. J Nematol 27: 258–262[Medline] Ekbom B (1998) Clutch size and larval performance of pollen beetles on different host plants. Oikos 83: 56–64[CrossRef][Web of Science] Galletti S, Bernardi R, Leoni O, Rollin P, Palmieri S (2001) Preparation and biological activity of four epiprogoitrin myrosinase-derived products. J Agric Food Chem 49: 471–476[CrossRef][Medline] Geervliet JBF (1997). Infochemical use by insect parasitoids in a tritrophic context: comparison of a generalist and a specialist. PhD thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Glazebrook J, Ausubel FM (1994) Isolation of phytoalexin-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana and characterization of their interactions with bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8955–8959 Grubb CD, Abel S (2006) Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends Plant Sci 11: 89–100[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 303–333[CrossRef][Medline] Harvey JA, Witjes LMA, Benkirane M, Duyts H, Wagenaar R (2007) Nutritional suitability and ecological relevance of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea as food plants for the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. Plant Ecol 189: 117–126[CrossRef] Hovanitz W, Chang VCS, Honch G (1963) The effectiveness of different isothiocyanates on attracting larvae of Pieris rapae. J Res Lepid 4: 249–259 Huang X, Renwick JAA (1993) Differential selection of host plants by two Pieris species: the role of oviposition stimulants and deterrents. Entomol Exp Appl 68: 59–69[CrossRef] Huang X, Renwick JAA (1994) Relative activities of glucosinolates as oviposition stimulants for Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 20: 1025–1037[CrossRef][Web of Science] Husebye H, Chadchawan S, Winge P, Thangstad OP, Bones AM (2002) Guard cell- and phloem idioblast-specific expression of thioglucoside glucohydrolase 1 (myrosinase) in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 128: 1180–1188 Jander G, Cui J, Nhan B, Pierce NE, Ausubel FM (2001) The TASTY locus on chromosome 1 of Arabidopsis affects feeding of the insect herbivore Trichoplusia ni. Plant Physiol 126: 890–898 Kim JH, Jander G (2007) Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeding on Arabidopsis induces the formation of a deterrent indole glucosinolate. Plant J 49: 1008–1019[Medline] Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation. Plant Physiol 126: 811–825 Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Mitchell-Olds T, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J (2001) The Arabidopsis epithiospecifier protein promotes the hydrolysis of glucosinolates to nitriles and influences Trichoplusia ni herbivory. Plant Cell 13: 2793–2807 Landry LG, Chapple CC, Last RL (1995) Arabidopsis mutants lacking phenolic sunscreens exhibit enhanced ultraviolet-B injury and oxidative damage. Plant Physiol 109: 1159–1166[Abstract] Li Q, Eigenbrode SI, Stringham G, Thiagarajah MH (2000) Feeding and growth of Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera eridania on Brassica juncea with varying glucosinolate concentrations and myrosinase activities. J Chem Ecol 26: 2401–2419[CrossRef][Web of Science] Little D, Gouhier-Darimont C, Bruessow F, Reymond P (2007) Oviposition by pierid butterflies triggers defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143: 784–800 Mauricio R (1998) Cost of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Am Nat 151: 20–28[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Miao Y, Zentgraf U (2007) The antagonist function of Arabidopsis WRKY53 and ESR/ESP in leaf senescence is modulated by the jasmonic and salicylic acid equilibrium. Plant Cell 19: 819–830 Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: a model system for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 693–700[CrossRef] Miles CI, del Campo ML, Renwick JA (2005) Behavioral and chemosensory responses to a host recognition cue by larvae of Pieris rapae. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 191: 147–155[CrossRef][Medline] Pedras MS, Nycholar CM, Montaut S, Xu Y, Khan AQ (2002) Chemical defenses of crucifers: elicitation and metabolism of phytoalexins and indole-3-acetonitrile in brown mustard and turnip. Phytochemistry 59: 611–625[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Petersen BL, Chen S, Hansen CH, Olsen CE, Halkier BA (2002) Composition and content of glucosinolates in developing Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 214: 562–571[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Peterson CJ, Cossé A, Coats JR (2000) Insecticidal components in the meal of Crambe abyssinica. J Agric Urban Entomol 17: 27–36 Pigliucci M (2002) Ecology and evolutionary biology of Arabidopsis. In CR Somerville, EM Meyerowitz, eds, The Arabidopsis Book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, MD, doi/10.1199/tab.0003, www.aspb.org/publications/arabidopsis/ Reifenrath K, Riederer M, Müller C (2005) Leaf surface wax layers of Brassicaceae lack feeding stimulants for Phaedon cochleariae. Entomol Exp Appl 115: 41–50[CrossRef] Renwick JAA, Haribal M, Gouinguene S, Städler E (2006) Isothiocyanates stimulating oviposition by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 32: 755–766[CrossRef][Medline] Renwick JAA, Lopez K (1999) Experience-based food consumption by larvae of Pieris rapae: addiction to glucosinolates? Entomol Exp Appl 91: 51–58[CrossRef] Renwick JAA, Radke CD, Sachdev-Gupta K, Städler E (1992) Leaf surface chemicals stimulating oviposition by Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbage. Chemoecology 3: 33–38[CrossRef] Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE (2000) Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 707–719 Rojas JC (1999) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of the cabbage moth to plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 25: 1867–1883[CrossRef][Web of Science] Rothschild M, Schoonhoven LM (1977) Assessment of egg load by Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Nature 266: 352–355[CrossRef] Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford Schuhegger R, Nafisi M, Mansourova M, Petersen BL, Olsen CE, Svatos A, Halkier BA, Glawischnig E (2006) CYP71B15 (PAD3) catalyzes the final step in camalexin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 141: 1248–1254 Städler E, Renwick JAA, Radke CD, Sachdev-Gupta K (1995) Tarsal contact chemoreceptors response to glucosinolates and cardenolides mediating oviposition in Pieris rapae. Physiol Entomol 20: 175–187[CrossRef] Staub RE, Feng C, Onisko B, Bailey GS, Firestone GL, Bjeldanes LF (2002) Fate of indole-3-carbinol in cultured human breast tumor cells. Chem Res Toxicol 15: 101–109[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Terofal F (1965) Zum Problem der Wirtsspezifität bei Pieriden (Lep.). Mitt Münch Ent Ges 55: 1–76 Traynier RMM, Truscott RJW (1991) Potent natural egg-laying stimulant for cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae. J Chem Ecol 17: 1371–1380[CrossRef][Web of Science] Truitt CL, Paré PW (2004) In situ translocation of volicitin by beet armyworm larvae to maize and systemic immobility of the herbivore elicitor in planta. Planta 281: 999–1007 Van Loon JJA, Blaakmeer A, Griepink FC, Van Beek TA, Schoonhoven LM, De Groot A (1992) Leaf surface compound from Brassica oleracea (Cruciferae) induces oviposition by Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Chemoecology 3: 39–44[CrossRef] Wadleigh RW, Yu SJ (1987) Gluthatione transferase activity of fall armyworm larvae toward Weigel D, Glazebrook J (2002) Arabidopsis: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY Wittstock U, Agerbirk N, Stauber EJ, Olsen CE, Hippler M, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Vogel H (2004) Successful herbivore attack due to metabolic diversion of a plant chemical defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 4861–4864 Xu Z, Escamilla-Trevino L, Zeng L, Lalgondar M, Bevan D, Winkel B, Mohamed A, Cheng CL, Shih MC, Poulton J, et al (2004) Functional genomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana glycoside hydrolase family 1. Plant Mol Biol 55: 343–367[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Zhang Z, Ober JA, Kliebenstein DJ (2006) The gene controlling the quantitative trait locus EPITHIOSPECIFIER MODIFIER1 alters glucosinolate hydrolysis and insect resistnace in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 1524–1536 Zhao Y, Hull AK, Gupta NR, Goss KA, Alonso J, Ecker JR, Normanly J, Chory J, Celenza JL (2002) Trp-dependent auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: involvement of cytochrome P450s CYP79B2 and CYP79B3. Genes Dev 16: 3100–3112 Zhou N, Tootle TL, Glazebrook J (1999) Arabidopsis PAD3, a gene required for camalexin biosynthesis, encodes a putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Plant Cell 11: 2419–2428 This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|