|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 147:446-455 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists Bacterial RNA Chaperones Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants and Improved Grain Yield in Maize under Water-Limited Conditions[W]Monsanto Company, Mystic Research, Mystic, Connecticut 06355 (P.C., D.W., R.J.B., D.C.A., C.B., M.H.L., J.E.H.); Monsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017 (J.H., M.S., M.A., R.D., S.N., S.B., M.F.); Monsanto Company, Malleswaram, Bangalore, 560003 India (G.K., J.T., S.D.); and Monsanto Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (S.S.)
Limited available water is the single most important factor that reduces global crop yields, with far reaching socioeconomic implications. In North America alone, it is estimated that 40% of yearly maize (Zea mays) crop losses are due to suboptimal water availability (Boyer, 1982
Maize plants are sensitive to water-deficit stress throughout the growing season. Stresses that occur during the flowering stage, either just before floral initiation or immediately after pollination, result in the most significant reductions in end-of-season grain yields (Claassen and Shaw, 1970
Improved plant performance under severe water-limited growth chamber and greenhouse conditions has been achieved through multiple transgenic approaches, including the use of osmotic protectants such as the sugar alcohols trehalose (Romero et al., 1997 Biotechnology approaches facilitate our ability to survey and capitalize on the extensive genetic diversity that exists in nature and to improve on conserved pathways important for adaptation to environmental stress. Adaptation requires rapid recovery in growth and maintenance of cellular function following stress. We have looked to model systems such as bacteria and plants for insights into adaptive stress response pathways and commonalities among stress response mechanisms broadly in search of candidates for crop improvement. In this article, we demonstrate that expression of related cold shock proteins (CSPs) from bacteria, CspA from Escherichia coli and CspB from Bacillus subtilis, promotes stress adaptation in multiple plant species. Interestingly, expression of CSP proteins in maize is not associated with negative pleiotropic effects, indicating that stress tolerance does not come at a cost to crop productivity under well-watered conditions.
RNA chaperones are ubiquitous and abundant proteins found in all living organisms and viruses. RNA tends to be kinetically trapped in misfolded forms, and RNA binding proteins, acting as chaperones, can resolve these structures, ensuring accessibility for its biological function. In bacteria, RNA chaperones are believed to play a general role in sustaining active growth by favoring active transcription, translation, and/or ribosome assembly. In E. coli, cell growth is arrested by cold shock, and the arrest is associated with a significant reduction in protein synthesis (Etchegaray et al., 1996
Several reports described below support the hypothesis that the endogenous function of CSPs in plants relies on RNA binding/chaperone activity through the CSD and that these proteins, similarly to bacteria, regulate stress responses through a posttranscriptional mechanism. Mussgnug et al. (2005)
In higher plants, Karlson et al. (2002) In this article, we demonstrate that bacterial CSPs can confer improved stress adaptation to multiple plant species. The action of CSPs in plants through a conserved stress adaptation mechanism common to plants and bacteria is supported by data showing that a functional RNA binding motif is required for the improved stress tolerance in both E. coli and maize. Stress tolerance at both vegetative and reproductive stages is reported with enhanced yield stability observed in maize under water-limiting conditions that were either imposed at various stages during plant development through controlled irrigation or occurred naturally in the western dryland region of the U.S. corn belt. Breadth of tolerance across environments and germplasms are key elements in establishing the value of transgenic strategies for crop stress tolerance improvement and require years of rigorous field testing to characterize the potential benefits.
The expression of bacterial CSPs was shown to improve cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings germinated and grown at low temperatures on standard agar media in petri dishes (Fig. 1 ). Transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings expressing CspA and CspB were tested for improved growth under low temperature conditions, using nontransgenic seedlings as controls. Following a 6-week treatment of 8°C under constant light, seedlings were visually scored for relative growth. At the end of the treatment period, a visual improvement in growth was noted for both transgenes, relative to their negative controls. This proof-of-concept for CSPs, demonstrating improved cold tolerance in a dicot plant species, was followed by similar abiotic stress experiments in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa).
Transgenic rice plants expressing CspA and CspB manifest improved stress tolerance for a number of abiotic stresses, including cold, heat, and water deficits. Improved tolerance was documented by demonstrating improved plant growth rates of transgenic plants relative to their nontransgenic controls, as measured by plant height (Table I ).
On average, the cold and heat treatments led to 35% and 31% reductions, respectively, in the final plant height of nontransgenic control plants. In the cold treatment, three of eight CspB-positive events demonstrated significantly greater plant heights (P < 0.05) at the end of the recovery period when compared to nontransgenic control plants. In the heat treatment, six of eight CspB-positive events demonstrated significantly greater plant heights (P < 0.05) at the end of the recovery period when compared to nontransgenic control plants. A water-limited treatment led to a 50% reduction in the final plant height of nontransgenic control plants relative to well-watered controls. CspB conferred improved tolerance to water deficits as demonstrated by greater final plant heights in transgene-positive plants. At the end of the water-limited treatment, three of four CspB events tested were significantly taller (P < 0.05) than their nontransgenic controls. One event demonstrated significant improvements under all three stress treatments, and several other events showed positive trends across multiple treatments. Overall, this demonstrated that expression of CspB in rice results in tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses, and this tolerance occurs with fairly high frequency in the individual stress treatments. For CspA-positive rice plants, cold and heat treatments also resulted in improved growth, as measured by greater final plant height. The treatment impact on plant height at the end of the recovery period resulted in a 46% and 51% reduction in plant height of nontransgenic control plants for the cold and heat treatments, respectively. Four of seven CspA events demonstrated significantly greater final plant height than their nontransgenic controls in the cold treatment, while three of seven CspA events demonstrated significantly greater final plant height compared to their nontransgenic control plants under the heat stress treatment. CspA rice plants were not evaluated in a water-deficit treatment. Thus, the cold tolerance we demonstrated in transgenic Arabidopsis, a dicot, was also observed in rice, a monocot. Furthermore, the improved stress tolerance was extended beyond the cold tolerance that we observed in Arabidopsis and shown to also include heat and water-deficit tolerance. The rice water-deficit results, in particular, present a compelling outcome that drove further abiotic stress testing of transgenic CspA and CspB in maize.
An important factor in the success of a field testing program is the ability to accurately collect phenotypic data under predictable and consistent water deficit conditions in a managed stress environment. This has been achieved through a field testing network located in rain-free environments, allowing precise control over irrigation levels. Herein, we have reported improved vegetative and reproductive performance in field-grown maize exposed to water deficits that were introduced during periods of vegetative growth and ovule and kernel development. We have demonstrated that transgenic expression of CspB in maize plants contributes to improved vegetative performance. Twenty-two CspB events were evaluated in water-limited field trials using commercial grade hybrid corn in environments that received no rainfall during the target period for the water-deficit treatment, a span of 10 to 14 d immediately prior to flowering. The water-deficit treatment resulted in an average reduction in growth rates to 50% of the well-watered rate. Using an across-event analysis, the CspB transgenics demonstrated a 3.6% increase in leaf extension rates relative to nontransgenic controls (Table II ). The best performing events demonstrated growth rate increases of 12% and 24%. This growth rate improvement under water-limited conditions indicated that the CspB transgene was having a substantial positive impact on plant productivity during the vegetative phase of plant growth and development. The CspB-expressing plants also demonstrated significant improvements in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates (Table II). Across all events, chlorophyll content was increased by 2.5%, with the top two events exhibiting increases of 4.4% and 3.3%. The improvements to the photosynthetic rates were 3.6% across all events, with increases of 8.5% and 7.7% for the top two performing events. Similar observations have been made with transgenic maize plants expressing CspA under greenhouse conditions (data not shown). These measures of vegetative performance are key indicators of plant productivity and would be expected to enhance the overall yield potential of the crop. When plants were grown under nonstressed, fully irrigated, or rain-fed conditions in both the greenhouse and field, we did not detect any appreciable difference between CspA- or CspB-expressing lines and the isogenic control for plant growth rate or plant height measured at different stages of development (data not shown).
Reproductive performance was evaluated for CspB plants by harvesting all kernel-bearing ears from six replicates (34 plants per replicate) for each of six events selected for harvest based on the magnitude of their improved vegetative performance. CspB-positive plants were compared to nontransgenic control plants grown in an adjacent row. An across-event analysis demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in the number of plants with kernel-bearing ears (+4.0%) and the number of kernels per plant (+11.7%; data not shown). There were no significant differences observed for individual kernel weight. The nature of the improvements, primarily more kernels on ears and more plants with kernel-bearing ears, was consistent with expectations based on the timing of the limited-water treatment, which occurred during late vegetative stages and early immature ear development and was relieved with sufficient water available to the plants during pollination and grain fill periods.
Grain yield trials were performed under water-deficit stress and nonstress conditions on 10 CspA and 10 CspB-positive events, most of which had previously demonstrated improved vegetative performance in either greenhouse screens or field trials. Grain yield data was collected from four field sites where water was limited during the late vegetative phase of development, a treatment similar to the initial water-deficit field trial. Mean yield at the water-limited sites was 6.8 tons (t)/ha, representing an approximately 50% reduction in yield relative to the average mean yield of crops in the Midwest. An across-event analysis demonstrates that the CspA transgenic entries provide a yield increase of 4.6% (P < 0.2) under water stress, with the two best performing events demonstrating advantages of 30.8% and 18.3% (Table III ). Yield averages of CspB-positive plants as a group were significantly greater than controls, by 7.5% (P < 0.01). A number of individual events exhibited significant yield advantages as well; the best two performing events, CspB-Zm event 1 and event 2, demonstrated yield improvements of 20.4% and 10.9%, respectively. These are the same two events that demonstrated significant improvements in leaf growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rates, providing evidence that these improvements in vegetative productivity will translate into improvements in reproductive performance and grain yield.
Several years of field trials have been conducted with a single CspB-expressing event, CspB-Zm event 1, to further investigate the ability of this gene to provide tolerance to water deficits during the late vegetative and reproductive developmental stages. Field trials were conducted under controlled water-deficit conditions where two distinct stress treatments were conducted by limiting water during these two stages of development. This single CspB event was deployed in three different hybrid backgrounds and evaluated under these stress regimes at five replicated locations. The two treatments resulted in decreases in the overall yield of the experiment by approximately 50% relative to well-watered treatments planted at the same locations. The CspB-positive entries exhibited improvements in end-of-season grain yield across the different hybrid entries and under both water stress regimes when compared to a conventional wild-type control of the same genetic background (Table IV ). Yield benefits in these experiments ranged from 11% to as much at 21% across yield values that averaged 6.4 to 8.5 t/ha. The transgenic CspB event consistently out-yielded the nontransgenic controls by at least 0.5 t/ha across 12 out of 15 reproductive stress treatments and 13 out of 15 vegetative stress treatments, highlighting the potential agricultural benefits that this technology can deliver.
A multi-year analysis was also conducted with CspB-Zm event 1 to assess the stability of the yield advantages across locations under water-limiting conditions. Locations that had experienced some level of water stress, where yield reductions ranged from 20% to 80%, were compiled and analyzed across years. Figure 2 indicates the yield stability observed for the transgenic entry and its control across 3 years of water stress testing in a single hybrid background. Yield advantages are evident across a wide range of environments with varying degrees of water-deficit stress, with yield levels ranging from as low as 2 t/ha to as high as 16 t/ha, indicating that this technology could have broad utility across the U.S. growing regions.
We have assessed the average performance of this material over the past several years, combining yield performance across three hybrid test-crosses that have been under evaluation in each of the prior 4 years. Across 4 years of testing, this CspB event provides an average yield benefit of 10.5% across three hybrid test-crosses under managed stress environmental testing. The average yield advantage each year was 0.89, 0.48, 0.49, and 0.79 t/Ha, representing percentage increases of 13.4%, 6.7%, 10.5%, and 11.3%, respectively. This same transgenic CspB event was tested under western dryland maize conditions without supplemental water. Hybrid entries were planted as 100-foot-long 4-row plots to better simulate normal agronomic conditions for this region, planting at appropriate population densities for those regions, and were paired with appropriate nontransgenic controls. Environmental data was collected and seasonal weather patterns, including rainfall accumulation, were utilized to classify the dryland locations as to whether each of the locations experienced water-deficit stress during the season. In the final analysis, 12 of the locations planted across the western dryland were categorized as having experienced water stress during the late vegetative through reproductive developmental stages and were utilized for analysis. As depicted in Figure 3 , yield benefits were observed in the same three hybrid backgrounds that were evaluated under controlled water-deficit conditions described in Table IV. When compared to the nontransgenic control, the CspB transgenic event provides yield benefits of up to 0.75 t/ha, or 15%. These dryland growing conditions created a lower yielding environment (average yield of the controls were 4.9 t/ha) than the controlled water-deficit locations where the overall yields of the controls ranged from 6.4 to 8.5 t/ha. The results from the managed stress environment treatments were very similar to the observations made under dryland growing conditions, highlighting the utility of the managed stress environmental testing platform.
Demonstration of significant yield improvements with transgenic CspB events under controlled drought environments as well as under water-stressed western dryland conditions represents a major advancement in the field of abiotic stress research. Continued evaluation of these materials across additional genetic backgrounds will be important ongoing work in the development of products for the U.S. corn belt.
A well-documented functional aspect of CSPs, including CspB, is their ability to bind single-stranded DNA or single-stranded RNA that can be measured by the protein's ability to open a stem-loop or double-stranded dual-labeled fluorescence probe in vitro. By mutating a key residue in the RNA binding domain of B. subtilis CspB (CspB_F30R), we have reduced the ability of this protein to open a double-stranded stem loop structure engineered into the probe (Fig. 4 ). There was an approximately 10-fold reduction in fluorescence observed with the CspB_F30R mutant, suggesting that this residue is important for maintaining RNA chaperone activity. A similar result has been obtained through mutation of the identical residue in the E. coli CspE protein (Phadtare et al., 2002
By expressing the CspB_F30R mutant protein constitutively in maize, we were able to assess the requirement of effective RNA chaperone activity to confer yield benefits under water stress. Of 11 CspB_F30R events tested, none was able to provide an increase in yield under water-deficit conditions when compared to nontransgenic controls, and results were effectively neutral when an across-event analysis was performed (data not shown). Field trial conditions were similar to those described in previous studies. Transgenic maize plants expressing CspA and CspB in the same field trials continued to confer yield benefits (data not shown). These data suggest that effective RNA chaperone activity of CspB is critical for providing tolerance to water-deficit stress and that the mode of action of CspB in maize occurs through its predicted function as an RNA chaperone.
Future progress toward more sustainable agricultural practices will be accelerated through the systematic analysis of gene function important for yield under water-deficit conditions. Model systems research has provided a greater understanding of pathways of plant stress acclimation that is further providing valuable insights into crop responses under environmental stress conditions. Rapidly moving to large-scale analyses of candidate gene function in crops, under standard agronomic practices and where the influences of environmental factors and the ultimate impact on yield can be assessed, is critical for developing improved crops through biotechnology.
We have demonstrated that constitutive expression of two members of a family of bacterial RNA chaperones, E. coli CspA and B. subtilus CspB, was shown to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. Importantly, the improvements in water-limited field trials were not associated with a yield penalty in high-yielding environments. Consistent with the timing of the water deficit, the positive yield impact of the transgenes was predominately on kernel numbers, not on kernel weight (data not shown). This technology has been observed under different stress regimes and across environments as clearly providing performance benefits under late vegetative/flowering water deficit as well as during the grain fill period. During these two periods, water-deficit stress leading to three consecutive days of wilting can lead to 30% to 50% reductions in grain yields (Claassen and Shaw, 1970 The potential utility of CSPs as transgenes is strongly supported by the demonstration that the two CSPs tested, which share only 61% overall identity, were both capable of improving stress tolerance in plants. As tested, we were not able to distinguish the performance of CspA from CspB, and we speculate that they are likely acting by similar mechanisms. The myriad of CSPs known in nature, and available for testing, and the possibility of improving on the current expression pattern and coding regions of these transgenes present intriguing possibilities for even further improvements.
Previous reports demonstrated that CSD protein functionality in vivo is significantly impaired by mutations that affect RNA binding. Nakaminami et al. (2006)
New insights into the functions of plant CSPs suggest that we are tapping into a conserved mechanism of cellular function. Plant CSPs and other plant RNA binding proteins have been shown to function as RNA chaperones in Arabidopsis and wheat (Nakaminami et al., 2006 Based on the yield and stress benefits we have observed from expression of CSD-containing proteins in plants and our current understanding of the common RNA chaperone function of CSD proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, expression of CSD proteins from a variety of plant and bacterial sources represents a promising approach for stimulating growth and productivity in plants under conditions of abiotic stress. The fact that expression of CSP proteins did not result in detrimental effects on plant size, development, or productivity as previously observed for other transgenic approaches further supports the utility of these proteins. It is interesting to speculate why CSP functionality was not selected for over the years of conventional breeding. However, the low heritability of yield, the challenges associated with controlled environment testing, and the quantitative nature of the trait are likely contributing factors. The stress tolerance conferred by CSPs represents a novel, compelling approach toward engineering improved plant productivity in suboptimal growth conditions. These studies have confirmed that this family of proteins is capable of delivering broad stress tolerance, which also translates to improvements in grain yield under both managed stress studies and marketplace environments. As water resources become increasingly scarce and the global demands for grain continue to increase, the ability to bring yield stability across water-limiting environments presents an important advancement in the area of stress tolerance research. The opportunity exists for the drought-tolerant trait to be added to a growing set of germplasm and trait options that mitigate environmental stresses on the corn plant and provide the crop with a better opportunity to reach its yield potential in any environment. Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers M30139 and U58859.
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
This work could not have been accomplished without the assistance from Don Nelson, Tom R. Adams, Brendan Hinchey, and Adrian Lund. Valuable advice and consultation was received from Philip Miller, Tom H. Adams, Stan Dotson, Nordine Cheikh, Mark Lawson, Tom Peters, and Mike Stephens. We would also like to acknowledge the many people who supported this work, including the plant transformation, greenhouse staff, and farm network teams. Mary Fernandes and Mark Abad contributed to the Arabidopsis work. Ganesh Kumar, Jayaprakash Targolli, and Santanu Dasgupta contributed to the rice work. Paolo Castiglioni, Don Anstrom, Robert Bensen, Dave Warner, Martin Stoecker, Jay Harrison, Christopher Bonin, Robert D'Ordine, Sara Salvador, Santiago Navarro, Stephanie Back, Michael Luethy, and Jacqueline Heard contributed to the maize work. Received March 11, 2008; accepted April 21, 2008; published June 6, 2008.
1 Present address: 1920 Fifth Street, Davis, CA 95616.
2 Present address: 700 Chesterfield Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63017. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Jacqueline E. Heard (jacqueline.e.heard{at}monsanto.com).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.118828 * Corresponding author; e-mail jacqueline.e.heard{at}monsanto.com.
Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443–448 Boyer JS, Westgate ME (2004) Grain yield with limited water. J Exp Bot 55: 2385–2394 Claassen MM, Shaw RH (1970) Water-deficit effects on corn. II. Grain composition. Agron J 62: 652–655 Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize. In DN Sparks, ed, Advances in Agronomy, Vol 86. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 83–145 El-Sharoud WM, Graumann PL (2007) Cold shock proteins aid coupling of transcription and translation in bacteria. Sci Prog 90: 15–27[Medline] Etchegaray JP, Jones PG, Inouye M (1996) Differential thermoregulation of two highly homologous cold-shock genes cspA and cspB of Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 1: 171–178[Abstract] Etchegaray JP, Inouye M (1999) CspA, CspB and CspG, major cold shock proteins of Escherichia coli, are induced at low temperature and under conditions that completely block protein synthesis. J Bacteriol 181: 1827–1830 Fusaro AF, Bocca SN, Ramos RL, Barrôco RM, Magioli C, Jorge VC, Coutinho TC, Rangel-Lima CM, De Rycke R, Inzé D, et al (2007) AtGRP2, a cold-induced nucleo-cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein, has a role in flower and seed development. Planta 225: 1339–1351[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Goldstein J, Pollitt NS, Inouye M (1990) Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 283–287 Gualerzi CO, Giuliodori AM, Pon CL (2003) Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of cold-shock genes. J Mol Biol 331: 527–539[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Horn G, Hofweber R, Kremer W, Kalbitzer HR (2007) Structure and function of bacterial cold shock proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 1457–1470[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Hunger K, Beckering CL, Wiegeshoff F, Graumann PL, Marahiel MA (2006) Cold-induced putative DEAD box RNA helicases CshA and CshB are essential for cold adaptation and interact with Cold Shock Protein B in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 188: 240–248 Jiang W, Hou Y, Inouye M (1997) CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J Biol Chem 272: 196–202 Karlson D, Imai R (2003) Conservation of the cold shock domain protein family in plants. Plant Physiol 131: 12–15 Karlson D, Nakaminami K, Toyomasu T, Imai R (2002) A cold-regulated nucleic acid-binding protein of winter wheat shares a domain with bacterial cold shock proteins. J Biol Chem 277: 35248–35256 Kim JS, Park SJ, Kwak KJ, Kim YO, Song J, Jang B, Jung CH, Kang H (2007) Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 506–516 Kishor P, Hong Z, Miao GH, Hu C, Verma D (1995) Overexpression of Manival X, Ghisolfi-Nieto L, Joseph G, Bouvet P, Erard M (2001) RNA-binding strategies common to cold-shock domain- and RNA recognition motif-containing proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 2223–2233 Mascarenhas J, Weber MH, Graumann PL (2001) Specific polar localization of ribosomes in Bacillus subtilis depends on active transcription. EMBO Rep 2: 685–689[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Matsumoto K, Meric F, Wolffe AP (1996) Translational repression dependent on the interaction of the Xenopus Y-box protein FRGY2 with mRNA: role of the cold shock domain, tail domain, and selective RNA sequence recognition. J Biol Chem 271: 22706–22712 Matsumoto K, Wolffe AP (1998) Gene regulation by Y-box proteins: coupling control of transcription and translation. Trends Cell Biol 8: 318–323[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Morison JIL, Baker NR, Mullineaux PM, Davies WJ (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 639–658[CrossRef][Medline] Mussgnug JH, Wobbe L, Elles I, Claus C, Hamilton M, Fink A, Kahmann U, Kapazoglou A, Mullineaux CW, Hippler M, et al (2005) NAB1 is an RNA binding protein involved in the light-regulated differential expression of the light-harvesting antenna of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 17: 3409–3421 Nakaminami K, Karlson DT, Imai R (2006) Functional conservation of cold shock domains in bacteria and higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 10122–10127 Nelson DE, Repetti PP, Adams TR, Creelman RA, Wu J, Warner DC, Anstrom DC, Bensen RJ, Castiglioni PP, Donnarummo MG, et al (2007) Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16450–16455 Phadtare S, Tyagi S, Inouye M, Severinov K (2002) Three amino acids in Eschericia coli CspE surface-exposed aromatic patch are critical for nucleic acid melting activity leading to transcription antiterminations and cold acclimation of cells. J Biol Chem 277: 46706–46711 Rathinasabapathi B, McCue KF, Gage DA, Hanson AD (1994) Metabolic engineering of glycine betaine synthesis: plant betaine aldehyde dehydrogenases lacking typical transitpeptides are targeted to tobacco chloroplasts where they confer betaine aldehyde resistance. Planta 193: 155–162[ISI][Medline] Romero C, Belles JM, Vaya JL, Serrano R, Culianez-Maria FA (1997) Expression of the yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthetase gene in transgenic tobacco plants: pleiotropic phenotypes include drought tolerance. Planta 201: 293–297[CrossRef][ISI] Sasaki K, Kim MH, Imai R (2007) Arabidopsis COLD SHOCK DOMAIN PROTEIN2 is a RNA chaperone that is regulated by cold and developmental signals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 364: 633–638[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Schröder K, Graumann P, Schnuchel A, Holak TA, Marahiel MA (1995) Mutational analysis of the putative nucleic acid-binding surface of the cold-shock domain, CspB, revealed an essential role of aromatic and basic residues in binding of single-stranded DNA containing the Y-box motif. Mol Microbiol 16: 699–708[ISI][Medline] Sheveleva E, Chmara W, Bohnert HJ, Jensen RG (1997) Increased salt and drought tolerance by D-ononitol production in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. Plant Physiol 115: 1211–1219[Abstract] Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, Seki M, Kasuga M, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2002) Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinal synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 29: 417–426[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Tarczynski MC, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ (1993) Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science 259: 508–510 Weber MH, Volkov AV, Fricke I, Marahiel MA, Graumann PL (2001) Localization of cold shock proteins to cytosolic spaces surrounding nucleoids in Bacillus subtilis depends on active transcription. J Bacteriol 183: 6435–6443 Weber MH, Marahiel MA (2003) Bacterial cold shock responses. Sci Prog 86: 9–75[Medline] Xia B, Ke H, Inouye M (2001) Acquirement of cold sensitivity by quadruple deletion of the cspA family and its suppression by PNPase S1 domain in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 40: 179–188[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Xu D, Duan X, Wang B, Hong B, Ho T, Wu R (1996) Expression or a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water-deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol 110: 249–257[Abstract]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|