This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R. Agricola Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R.

EDITOR'S CHOICE SERIES ON THE NEXT GENERATION OF BIOTECH CROPS

Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?

Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia (N.C.C.); INRA, UMR 759 LEPSE, F–34000 Montpellier, France (F.T.); Montpellier SupAgro, UMR 759 LEPSE, F–34000 Montpellier, France (F.T.); and Department of Agroenvironmental Sciences and Technology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy (R.T.)

The improvement of crop yield has been possible through the indirect manipulation of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that control heritable variability of the traits and physiological mechanisms that determine biomass production and its partitioning. This article surveys how QTL-based approaches contribute to a better understanding of the genetic basis of crop performance under environmentally constrained conditions and critically analyzes how this knowledge can assist breeders accelerate the release of cultivars better able to cope with abiotic constraints.

Crop performance is the end result of the action of thousands of genes and their interactions with environmental conditions and cultural practices. During the past century, conventional breeding has been very successful in constantly raising the yield potential of crops (Campos et al., 2004; Borlaug and Dowswell, 2005; Duvick, 2005). This was mainly achieved with little or no knowledge of the factors governing the genetic variability exploited by breeders for crop improvement (Blum, 1988; Borlaug, 2007). However, this approach may now be insufficient, because the pressure to provide improvements at a rapid pace will mount if global climate change increases the frequency and severity of abiotic constraints. Heat stress, drought, water-logging, and salinity will probably become more prevalent in certain areas, while there will be an increased demand for agricultural products and reduced availability of agricultural land and natural resources such as water and fertilizers. Consequently, the genetic dissection of the quantitative traits controlling the adaptive response of crops to abiotic stress is a prerequisite to allow cost-effective applications of genomics-based approaches to breeding programs aimed at improving the sustainability and stability of yield under adverse conditions.

	UNVEILING THE NATURE OF QUANTITATIVE VARIABILITY

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
Robertson (1985) postulated that qualitative mutant alleles and QTL alleles represent the extremes of a possible range of effects, with QTLs resulting from the segregation of natural alleles with smaller effects. The cloning of a number of plant QTLs has confirmed Robertson's hypothesis, in as much as the types of mutations, genes, and metabolic pathways determining quantitative traits are not distinct from those underlying Mendelian traits and in some cases involve the same loci for which a strong mutation was already known (Salvi and Tuberosa, 2005; Bortiri et al., 2006). Examples of the latter are provided by studies of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) tolerance to water deficit (Masle et al., 2005), salinity (Rus et al., 2006), and aluminum (Al) toxicity (Hoekenga et al., 2006).

Constitutive versus Adaptive QTLs

QTLs can be categorized according to the stability of their effects across environmental conditions. A "constitutive" QTL is consistently detected across most environments, while an "adaptive" QTL is detected only in specific environmental conditions or increases in expression with the level of an environmental factor (e.g. a QTL that is expressed more strongly with increasing temperature; Vargas et al., 2006). The presence and magnitude of these adaptive QTLs, therefore, vary greatly between experiments, while the sensitivity of the same trait to environmental conditions can be underscored by stable QTLs across a range of environments (see below on modeling). The sensitivity to environmental conditions may be due to the responsiveness of regulation (e.g. transcription) of the QTL gene to an environmental cue. Alternatively, differences in response may have an indirect cause (e.g. genotypes with larger root systems will be less affected by water shortage or nutrient deficit, so genes controlling root development may underpin QTLs defined by abscisic acid [ABA] content, stomatal conductance, or biomass accumulation). Additionally, QTLs that alter flowering time often influence yield under water or nutrient deficit because the duration of the crop life cycle affects the timing and intensity of the stress experienced by the plants (Reynolds and Tuberosa, 2008). Consequently, the basis for the differences between adaptive and constitutive QTLs is less straightforward than is often assumed, and the unpredictability of the effects shown by most QTLs on yield in different environmental conditions should not be surprising.

Collecting and Interpreting QTL Data under Environmentally Constrained Conditions

In order to obtain reproducible data and effectively assess the value of a trait, it is of the utmost importance to consider the environment dependence of QTL expression. This aspect is particularly relevant for stress tolerance traits, which are themselves influenced by the intensity of the stress. For example, ABA levels in the xylem sap and in the leaf control stomatal conductance and transpiration and, therefore, the rate of soil and plant dehydration (Iuchi et al., 2001), factors that themselves influence plant ABA levels (Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998; Tardieu, 2003). Accordingly, the inherent capacity of genotypes to accumulate ABA should be assessed by exposing plants to constant and defined levels of evaporative demand and soil water potential using phenotyping platforms that can provide these conditions (Granier et al., 2006; Sadok et al., 2007).

In addition to environment-dependent expression, other factors are likely to hamper the utilization of QTLs for genetic improvement. A desirable QTL allele discovered in non-elite genetic material may not offer any improvement, because the allele may already be ubiquitous in current varieties. Additionally, the effects of the positive allele may not be transferable to elite backgrounds due to unfavorable epistatic interactions (Podlich et al., 2004). With only a few notable exceptions (e.g. Bo1, a major boron [B] tolerance QTL in bread wheat [Triticum aestivum; Schnurbusch et al., 2007]; Sub1, a major submergence tolerance QTL in rice [Oryza sativa; Ismail et al., 2008]; and Vgt1, a major flowering time QTL in maize [Zea mays; Vladutu et al., 1999; Salvi et al., 2007; Ducrocq et al., 2008]), QTLs from a particular genetic background usually show smaller effects or disappear altogether in different backgrounds, even under similar experimental conditions. Consequently, translating the knowledge gained from QTL and other molecular studies into a tangible product for the farmer is by far one of the most daunting challenges faced by the scientific community and needs to be tackled using a multidisciplinary, holistic approach with collaboration among the different stakeholders (Parry et al., 2005; Passioura, 2007; Tuberosa et al., 2007; Xu and Crouch, 2008). Essential, but not sufficient, prerequisites for meeting this challenge are: (1) identification of the main traits that determine crop yield under the prevailing conditions of the target population of environments; (2) identification of QTLs that govern these traits; and (3) implementation of marker-assisted selection (MAS) schemes to exploit the best QTL alleles. A number of reviews have addressed the most important issues to be considered in using QTL approaches for crop improvement (Hospital and Charcosset, 1997; Beavis, 1998; Hospital et al., 2000; Servin and Hospital, 2002; Servin et al., 2004; Bernardo et al., 2006; Bernardo and Yu, 2007; Dwivedi et al., 2007; Ragot and Lee, 2007; Xu and Crouch, 2008). The next sections describe QTL case studies for each of these three prerequisites and provide a glimpse of how combining accurate and relevant phenotyping with modeling can help deal with the above-mentioned complexity.

	CASE STUDIES IN QTL MAPPING AND MAS FOR TOLERANCE TO ABIOTIC STRESSES

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
During their entire life cycles, crops are exposed to multiple abiotic stresses that limit yield. The ushering in of the genomics era has allowed dissection of the physiological and molecular traits underlying stress tolerance mechanisms to an unprecedented level (Bohnert et al., 2006; Tuberosa and Salvi, 2006; Jenks et al., 2007; Vij and Tyagi, 2007). To date, hundreds of studies and reviews have reported QTLs that may play a role in mitigating the negative effects of abiotic stresses. However, MAS has contributed very little to the release of improved cultivars with greater tolerance to abiotic stresses, and this is perhaps partly because, with only a few exceptions (LeDeaux et al., 2006; MacMillan et al., 2006; Ribaut et al., 2007; Welcker et al., 2007), interactions between multiple stresses are seldom considered. Therefore, promising strategies to improve performance under water-limiting conditions involve MAS of genes and QTLs for tolerance to abiotic and biotic factors that impair root growth and function, such as nematodes in soybean (Glycine max; Ha et al., 2007) and bread wheat (Langridge, 2005; Zwart et al., 2006), high B in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and bread wheat (Langridge, 2005; Schnurbusch et al., 2007; Sutton et al., 2007), and Al toxicity in rice (Nguyen et al., 2003) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; Magalhaes et al., 2007). A common feature of cereal responses to drought, heat, and cold stresses near flowering and during early stages of seed growth is a reduction of reproductive fertility. This loss of fertility has been attributed to a range of metabolic causes (e.g. insufficient supply of photosynthates, excessive accumulation of ABA, changes in the cell cycle following diverse signalings, etc.) acting during gametogenesis and/or during the early stages of grain growth (Zinselmeier et al., 1999, 2002; Saini and Westgate 2000; McLaughlin and Boyer, 2004a, 2004b, 2007; Fresneau et al., 2007). The QTL approach provides an opportunity to dissect out the genetic and physiological components affecting source-sink relationships under abiotic stress (Prioul et al., 1997, 1999; Pelleschi et al., 2006; Miralles and Slafer, 2007; Welcker et al., 2007).

QTLs for Drought Tolerance

Among the different abiotic stresses, drought is by far the most complex and devastating on a global scale (Pennisi, 2008). Improving the tolerance of crops to drought, compared with other abiotic stresses, requires a broader interdisciplinary approach, involving an understanding of the factors (e.g. availability of water during the crop cycle) determining yield in a particular target population of environments. Drought tolerance is one of the most ambiguous concepts in the literature (Tardieu, 2003; Blum, 2005), and its definition is strongly dependent on the phenotyping methods used. Remarkable levels of dehydration tolerance have been obtained under laboratory conditions using genetic engineering strategies designed to manipulate a variety of processes, including cell protection mechanisms (Garg et al., 2002; Capell and Christou, 2004; Jenks et al., 2007; Nelson et al., 2007), detoxification of reactive oxygen species that accumulate under stress (Lee et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007), and hormone balance to facilitate an avoidance strategy (Iuchi et al., 2001; Hsieh et al., 2002; Rivero et al., 2007). Nevertheless, there is at present little evidence that characteristics enabling survival under the drastic water stresses typically imposed on the tested transgenic lines will provide any yield advantage under the milder stress conditions usually experienced in commercially productive fields. In contrast, exploitation of natural variation for drought-related traits has resulted in slow but unequivocal progress in crop performance (Rebetzke et al., 2002; Ribaut et al., 2004; Reynolds and Tuberosa, 2008).

Biomass accumulation is intrinsically linked to transpiration, because stomatal aperture and leaf area determine the rate of both photosynthesis and transpiration. Therefore, there is an inherent contradiction between biomass accumulation and stress avoidance via a reduction of transpiration. The genetic progress can only optimize the terms of this conflict by taking different, and in many cases opposite, strategies, such as: (1) maintaining or even increasing transpiration rate, thereby increasing the biomass accumulation but also the risk of crop failure following excessive soil dehydration; (2) maintaining growth and biomass accumulation under low water status, again with a maintained biomass accumulation and a consequent increased risk of excessive soil dehydration; (3) conversely, reducing the risk of total yield loss by decreasing cumulated transpiration, for instance by reducing the duration of the crop cycle, leaf area, or stomatal conductance; and (4) increasing the amount of harvested biomass per unit of transpired water (water use efficiency [WUE]), which often coincides with the conservative strategy described in (3).

The maintenance of transpiration rate under water deficit is most often achieved by improving the size, architecture, or hydraulic conductance of the root system (Price et al., 2002; Steele et al., 2006; Maurel et al., 2008). This is observed when an improved root system increases access to soil moisture. In contrast, when roots grow in a limited volume of soil because of physical (e.g. hard layer due to compaction) or chemical (e.g. acid soil) barriers, a larger and/or deeper root system can be detrimental, because depletion of soil moisture occurs more rapidly, thereby causing severe stress at the end of the season (Tardieu et al., 1992), and because the assimilates invested in roots would be better invested in other organs. Accordingly, while a number of genetic studies of root systems have shown positive associations between yield and certain root features (see below), some programs to improve yield under water deficit have resulted in a reduced root biomass (Bolaños and Edmeades, 1993; Bruce et al., 2002) or a decreased water conductivity of the roots (Richards and Passioura, 1989).

A number of studies have reported QTLs for root architecture and have investigated their effects on yield under varying moisture regimes in rice (MacMillan et al., 2006; Steele et al., 2006, 2007; Yue et al., 2006) and maize (Tuberosa et al., 2002, 2003; Landi et al., 2007). In rice, following the identification of four major QTLs influencing root traits (Courtois et al., 2000), marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) was used to introgress the alleles for greater root length from Azucena into Kalinga III, an upland variety (Steele et al., 2006, 2007). In maize, a major QTL originally reported for leaf ABA concentration (Tuberosa et al., 1998) was later shown to affect root size and architecture (Giuliani et al., 2005b) and grain yield (Landi et al., 2007). Following its isogenization (Landi et al., 2005), the positional cloning of this QTL is under way at present (S. Salvi, unpublished data).

Another strategy to maintain transpiration is to avoid leaf senescence ("stay-green" trait), thereby increasing the accumulated photosynthesis over the crop life cycle (Borrell et al., 2001). As above, this strategy is adequate for soils with appreciable water reserves but may otherwise cause severe stress at the end of the growth season due to increased transpiration (Hammer et al., 2006). In sorghum, four major QTLs that control stay-green and grain yield (Stg1–Stg4) have been identified (Harris et al., 2007). Near-isogenic lines (NILs) for these Stg QTLs have been derived, providing an opportunity for a detailed analysis of stay-green physiology and positional cloning of the underlying genes.

The maintenance of growth and biomass accumulation under water deficit allows better light interception by leaves, thereby increasing photosynthesis but also transpiration rate and soil water depletion. Therefore, it is an appropriate strategy in many cases, but not for severe terminal water deficits. The decline in leaf growth rate with water deficit is a very sensitive response, resulting in decreased photosynthesis and transpiration rate. A high degree of genetic variability in sensitivity has been observed in maize, with a cessation of nocturnal leaf growth occurring in a range from –0.8 to –1.6 MPa (Welcker et al., 2007), and also in rice (J. Cairns, unpublished data). In three maize mapping populations, QTLs of leaf growth sensitivity to water deficit largely overlapped with QTLs for leaf responses to evaporative demand, suggesting hydraulic mechanisms (Reymond et al., 2003; Sadok et al., 2007; Welcker et al., 2007). It is noteworthy that in one mapping population, half of the QTLs for sensitivity of leaf growth overlapped with those for silk growth (Welcker et al., 2007), suggesting that mechanisms favoring expansive growth may affect multiple organs.

The expansive growth of reproductive organs is also subject to genetic variation. In maize, the growth rate of the silks differs between genotypes, resulting in differences in the relative timing of male and female flowering (anthesis-silking interval [ASI]), which is typically increased by water deficit and negatively correlated with yield (Duvick, 2005). Phenotypic selection under well-managed stress environments for low ASI has produced large genetic gains and has resulted in significant impacts (Bolaños and Edmeades, 1996; Ribaut et al., 2004). Five QTL alleles for short ASI were introgressed through MABC from a drought-tolerant donor to an elite, drought-susceptible line. Under severe drought, the selected lines clearly outyielded the unselected control. However, this advantage decreased at a lower stress intensity and vanished when stress curtailed yield less than 40% (Ribaut and Ragot, 2007).

Among the yield components in grain crops, seed weight usually has a large impact under terminal drought. In pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum), an extensive data set allowed the identification of three major QTLs for grain yield with low QTL x environment interactions across a range of postflowering moisture environments, and selection of these positive alleles by MAS could be useful in breeding programs (Bidinger et al., 2007). Major QTLs for seed weight and grain yield across diverse moisture conditions have also been identified in rice (Wang et al., 2006; Bernier et al., 2007) and durum wheat (Triticum durum; Maccaferri et al., 2008).

The increase in WUE (i.e. the amount of biomass produced per unit of transpired water; Bacon, 2004) may seem to be the ideal candidate mechanism for drought-prone environments. However, increasing WUE has been regarded as a conservative strategy for crops involving reduced transpiration, because it can have a reduced yield benefit under moderately favorable environments and even cause a yield penalty under the most favorable conditions (Rebetzke et al., 2002; Condon et al., 2004). Most studies of WUE are based on the discrimination of the lighter and prevalent isotope of carbon in CO₂ (¹²C over ¹³C), which is linked to WUE both by statistical relations and by a physical theory (Farquhar et al., 1989). Mapping the discrimination trait has enabled the identification of WUE QTLs in Brassica oleracea (Hall et al., 2005), rice (Laza et al., 2006), barley (Teulat et al., 2002), and wheat (Spielmeyer et al., 2007). The use of carbon isotope discrimination per se (rather than genetic markers linked to QTLs) in wheat grown in Australian environments, where water must be used conservatively to allow the crop to complete its life cycle, has led to the release of two cultivars (Condon et al., 2004).

The above paragraphs suggest that the maintenance of biomass accumulation under water deficit should be considered as an optimization process between transpiration, biomass accumulation, and its partitioning between root and shoot, rather than as a tolerance process per se. It follows that a given QTL can have positive, null, or negative additive effects depending on the drought scenario (Chapman et al., 2003; Vargas et al., 2006). This complication has considerably slowed the utilization of QTL data for breeding. Additionally, the complexity of predicting the performance of a particular genotype when considering multiple QTLs suggests a role for modeling.

QTLs for Salinity Tolerance

Salinity toxicity in crops is caused by the presence of high levels of soluble salts in the soil solution, namely the Na⁺ cation and probably to a lesser extent Cl^–. Salinity affects approximately 830 million hectares worldwide and is becoming an increasing problem in regions where saline water is used for irrigation (Rengasamy, 2006). Salt tolerance has often been found to be associated with lower accumulation of sodium (Na) in the shoot, but not always. In bread wheat, shoot Na accumulation and salt tolerance were not correlated, suggesting that tissue tolerance would be a better selection criterion for salinity tolerance (Genc et al., 2007). Tissue tolerance in leaves would be identified by mapping a locus that controls salt tolerance but not shoot Na accumulation. Tissue tolerance is likely achieved by sequestration of toxic Na in the vacuole. Using Na accumulation and other measures of salt tolerance, major and minor QTLs have been mapped in various crop species (Flowers and Flowers, 2005; Jenks et al., 2007). As Na accumulation is heavily dependent on transpiration rate, salinity tolerance could depend on growing medium and growth stage. Selection for salt tolerance has been performed in hydroponics, where transpiration is low. However, at least in wheat, the results of salinity tolerance measurements obtained in hydroponics were in good agreement with those of soil-based screens (Genc et al., 2007).

Recently, members of the HKT (for high-affinity K⁺ transporter) family of K⁺ and Na⁺ transporters (Platten et al., 2006; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006) were demonstrated or implicated to control natural variation in salinity tolerance at a number of loci in rice, wheat, and Arabidopsis. Two loci, Nax1 and Nax2, controlling shoot Na accumulation were identified by QTL mapping in durum wheat (genome AABB; Munns et al., 2003; James et al., 2006). Both exclusion genes represent introgressions from an accession of Triticum monococcum (genome AA). The Na exclusion genes have also been introgressed into backgrounds of five cultivars of bread wheat (genome AABBDD) by using durum x bread wheat interspecific crosses and MABC, and the resulting lines are currently under field evaluation in three Australian states (Colmer et al., 2006; R. James and R. Munns, personal communication). TmHKT7-A2 is the candidate for Nax1 on chromosome arm 2AL (Huang et al., 2006). TmHKT1;5-A (HKT8) is the candidate for Nax2 on chromosome arm 5AL, and the corresponding homolog in the D genome (TaHKT1;5-D) is the candidate for the Kna1 gene on chromosome arm 4DL, which is responsible for the superior salt tolerance of bread wheat compared with durum wheat (Byrt et al., 2007). The apparent ortholog of the TaHKT1;5 genes in rice (OsHKT1;5) affects Na accumulation and salt tolerance controlled by a mapped QTL on rice chromosome 1 (Ren et al., 2005). An HKT1 homolog in Arabidopsis (AtHKT1) has been mapped to a natural QTL (Rus et al., 2006), and its contribution to shoot Na exclusion and salinity tolerance in this species was demonstrated with an insertion mutant (Sunarpi et al., 2005). Plant HKT transporters reduce shoot Na accumulation by facilitating the unloading of Na from the xylem (Ren et al., 2005; Sunarpi et al., 2005). Nax1 promotes Na retention in the leaf sheath relative to the leaf blade, whereas Nax2 and Kna1 do not affect this relative accumulation, suggesting that the former promotes xylem unloading of Na in the leaf sheath as well as in the roots (James et al., 2006).

QTLs for Submergence and Anoxia Tolerance

In rice alone, submergence stress periodically affects approximately 15 million hectares of rain-fed lowland areas in Asia, causing annual losses of up to U.S. $1 billion (Xu et al., 2006). Sub1, a major QTL on chromosome 9, has enabled the use of MABC to improve submergence tolerance of Swarna, a cultivar widely grown in flood-prone regions (Neeraja et al., 2007). In backcrosses between a submergence-tolerant donor and Swarna, molecular markers were used to select for both introgression of Sub1 and recovery of the recurrent parent background. A double recombinant line was identified that was homozygous for all Swarna-type alleles except for an approximately 2.3- to 3.4-Mb region harboring Sub1. The results showed that the Swarna could be efficiently converted to a submergence-tolerant variety in three backcross generations over a period of only 2 to 3 years. Markers have been developed for introgressing Sub1 into six other popular varieties to develop a wider range of submergence-tolerant varieties to meet the needs of farmers in flood-prone regions (Ismail et al., 2008; Septiningsih et al., 2008). Field testing of the six NILs (with and without Sub1 introgression) showed that Sub1 is effective in all target environments and is independent of the recurrent parent background, with no effect on agronomic or quality aspects of these varieties under normal shallow conditions. Relative to the intolerant lines, Sub1 NILs had severalfold greater yield when flooding occurred for 12 to 18 d during the vegetative stage (A. Ismail, personal communication). It is expected that cultivation of these new varieties will significantly increase yield and food security for the local farmers. Positional cloning revealed a cluster of three putative ethylene response factor genes (Sub1A, Sub1B, and Sub1C) responsible for controlling the phenotype at the Sub1 locus (Xu et al., 2006). While Sub1B and Sub1C were found to be invariably present in the Sub1 region of all rice accessions analyzed, the presence of Sub1A was variable. Among those indica varieties that possess this gene, two alleles were revealed: a tolerance-specific allele named Sub1A-1 and an intolerance-specific allele named Sub1A-2. Overexpression of Sub1A-1 in a submergence-intolerant O. sativa ssp. japonica conferred enhanced tolerance to the plants, down-regulation of Sub1C, and up-regulation of Alcohol dehydrogenase1 (Adh1), thus indicating that Sub1A-1 is a primary determinant of submergence tolerance (Xu et al., 2006). MABC was also used to pyramid a submergence-tolerant QTL allele together with three genes for tolerance to different biotic stresses into KDML105, an indica cultivar widely grown in Thailand (Toojinda et al., 2005). These two reports clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of MAS for introgressing agronomically valuable QTL alleles into elite material.

QTLs for Low- and High-Temperature Tolerance

Heat stress often accompanies drought stress, and the two interact in the way they affect plants. Excessive heat perturbs many cellular and developmental processes and directly affects grain production by reducing fertility and grain quality (Barnabás et al., 2008). Male gametophyte development is the facet of reproduction that appears most prone to disruption by drought, heat, and cold stresses (Saini, 1997; Mamun et al., 2006). However, it is unclear at present whether there is any common basis to the sensitivity of male reproduction to the various stresses. The genetic basis of heat stress tolerance in crop plants is poorly understood. In wheat, two QTLs were identified that controlled grain-filling duration, a trait thought to be correlated with heat tolerance (Yang et al., 2002). In maize, QTLs were identified that controlled pollen heat tolerance (germinability and pollen tube growth), a factor influencing heat-induced sterility (Frova and Sari-Gorla, 1994). Studies investigating multiple parameters related to heat tolerance in wheat provided evidence for genetic variability and multiple tolerance mechanisms (Dhanda and Munjal, 2006). Mutants for seven "hot" loci in Arabidopsis, which are compromised in their ability to acquire thermotolerance, may further our understanding of heat tolerance in crop species (Hong et al., 2003).

Maize and rice originate from tropical/subtropical regions and are relatively cold sensitive. Chilling leads to poor seedling establishment and, at booting stage, results in reduced fertility due mainly to the arrest of microspore development. QTLs controlling sensitivity to chilling have been identified in maize seedlings (Hund et al., 2005; Jompuk et al., 2005; Presterl et al., 2007), in sorghum seedlings (Knoll and Ejeta, 2008), and in rice at the seedling and booting stages (Andaya and Tai, 2006; Kuroki et al., 2007; Lou et al., 2007). In cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a QTL allele introgressed from a wild relative (Solanum hirsutum) increased chilling tolerance (Goodstal et al., 2005). Crops sown in the fall may experience subfreezing temperatures at the vegetative stage during winter. Freezing damage arises from dehydration and membrane damage caused by the growth of ice crystals. Full expression of frost tolerance at the vegetative stage typically requires a prior period of acclimation during which plants are exposed to low, nonfreezing temperatures (Xin and Browse, 2000). Loci controlling vegetative frost tolerance have been identified at corresponding positions across the Triticeae species at two locations on the long arms of group 5 chromosomes. The proximal loci (Fr-1) are close to or coincident with the Vrn-1 loci involved in flowering response to vernalization. Clusters of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR (CBF) genes map at the distal (Fr-2) loci and represent likely candidates for the controlling genes (Galiba et al., 2005; Båga et al., 2007; Francia et al., 2007). CBFs, also known as dehydration-responsive element-binding 1 factors, are cold-responsive transcription factors with likely roles in coordinating cold responses leading to cold/freezing tolerance in plants (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000). A CBF gene (CBF2) also maps at a freezing-tolerant QTL in Arabidopsis and appears to be the controlling gene (Alonso-Blanco et al., 2005). In many parts of the world, frost at flowering time can also cause sterility or shriveled grains in cereals and other crops, leading to sporadic episodes of severe losses (Fuller et al., 2007). QTLs for reproductive frost tolerance have been reported in barley, near the Fr-H1 locus, and on chromosome arm 2HL (Reinheimer et al., 2004). However, efforts to breed for reproductive frost tolerance have met with comparatively little success, most likely due to the lack of sufficient genetic variation, the confounding effects of tiller developmental stage on susceptibility, and the dependence on frost simulation chambers for efficient phenotyping. QTLs for winter hardiness have also been identified in lentil (Lens culinaris; Kahraman et al., 2004), rapeseed (Brassica napus; Asghari et al., 2007), and ryegrass (Lolium perenne; Xiong et al., 2007).

QTLs for Tolerance to Mineral Toxicities and Deficiencies

Plant growth is severely impaired in soils containing toxic or insufficient concentrations of particular minerals (Ismail et al., 2007). Soil acidity (pH < 5.0), a characteristic of over half of the world's arable land, poses a serious limitation to crop production worldwide, principally through the effect of promoting Al toxicity.

Aluminum Toxicity Tolerance
Al is the most abundant metallic element in the earth's crust. At acid pH, the phytotoxic Al³⁺ cation is released into the soil solution, where it inhibits root growth, hindering the ability of plants to acquire water and nutrients. Liming and use of tolerant crop varieties can be used to treat soil acidity (Kochian et al., 2005). Major loci and QTLs controlling Al tolerance have been identified in alfalfa (Medicago sativa; Narasimhamoorthy et al., 2007), soybean (Bianchi-Hall et al., 2000), rice (Xue et al., 2007), sorghum (Magalhaes et al., 2007), maize (Ninamango-Cárdenas et al., 2003), barley (Wang et al., 2007), wheat (Raman et al., 2005), oat (Avena sativa; Wight et al., 2006), and rye (Secale cereale; Matos et al., 2005). Comparative mapping has indicated possible homologies between Al tolerance loci in different cereal species (Kochian et al., 2005). The most commonly documented mechanism of Al tolerance is the Al-activated extrusion of Al-chelating anions such as malate and citrate from the root tips and subsequent formation of nontoxic Al complexes in the apoplast or rhizosphere. The four recently cloned Al tolerance genes all encode organic anion transporters involved in this tolerance mechanism. Malate transporters belonging to the novel plant-specific Al-activated malate transporter 1 (ALMT1) family of proteins are encoded by Al tolerance genes in wheat and Arabidopsis (Sasaki et al., 2004; Hoekenga et al., 2006), and citrate transporters belonging to the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family of membrane transporters are encoded by Al tolerance genes in sorghum and barley (Furukawa et al., 2007; Magalhaes et al., 2007). A cluster of ALMT1 genes also controls Al tolerance in rye (Collins et al., 2008). mRNA expression levels of the tolerance genes cloned from wheat, barley, and sorghum showed strong positive correlations with the tolerance and organic acid secretion levels in collections of diverse genotypes of these species (Raman et al., 2005; Furukawa et al., 2007; Magalhaes et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007). At least for the major cloned Al tolerance gene in sorghum, multiple tolerance alleles conferring a range of tolerance levels seem to exist (Caniato et al., 2007). Therefore, mRNA expression levels of these cloned tolerance genes may be a more reliable and quantitative indicator of Al tolerance than a marker based on the sequence of an individual tolerance allele and, therefore, may serve as a better means of identifying sources of Al tolerance for use in breeding.

Tolerance to Zinc Deficiency
Zinc (Zn) deficiency is one of the most widespread crop micronutrient deficiencies and is capable of causing severe yield reductions. Zn deficiency is also a common problem of human nutrition in developing countries and in vegetarians, making it desirable to generate foods with higher Zn content. In wheat and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), the ability to grow well on Zn-deficient soils was correlated with high Zn content in the grain, suggesting that the two traits can be selected together (Graham et al., 1999; Gelin et al., 2007). In wheat and bean grain, Zn content is often positively correlated with the accumulation of iron, another nutrient important for human nutrition (Graham et al., 1999; Gelin et al., 2007). Wissuwa et al. (2006) identified two major QTLs for Zn efficiency in rice. Interestingly, loci controlling Zn efficiency in solution culture and a flooded field site did not coincide. One possible explanation is that mechanisms to increase the bioavailability of Zn, such as exudation of organic acids or phytosiderophores from the roots, behaved differently in these two situations (Wissuwa et al., 2006). In some wheat genotypes, relief from Zn deficiency in an arid environment was only achieved with the concomitant application of water, indicating that soil moisture may be important in facilitating the acquisition of Zn by certain mechanisms (Bagci et al., 2007). QTLs influencing Zn content in bean seeds have been described (Gelin et al., 2007). However, loci controlling the ability of crop plants to tolerate Zn-deficient soils have, to our knowledge, not yet been reported.

Tolerance to Low and High Boron
B is an essential micronutrient that can be present in either limiting or toxic concentrations in cultivated soils. B-toxic soils occur naturally in arid and semiarid regions such as Australia and can arise as a consequence of using irrigation water high in B. Loci for B toxicity tolerance have been identified by QTL mapping in barley and wheat (Jefferies et al., 1999, 2000). B tolerance may be associated with a reduction in shoot B accumulation, root stunting, or leaf symptoms, depending on the locus, suggesting that a variety of natural B tolerance mechanisms exist. A major B toxicity tolerance gene in wheat (Bo1) has been credited as being an important determinant of yield in cultivars that perform well in B-toxic regions of southern Australia. An easy-to-use PCR marker (Schnurbusch et al., 2007) is facilitating MAS of Bo1 in breeding programs (T. Schnurbusch and P. Langridge, personal communication). In barley, linkage to undesirable genes may have hampered the successful utilization of strong B toxicity tolerance derived from an Algerian landrace (Eglinton et al., 2004). However, the recent fine-mapping and cloning of the major B tolerance QTL allele from this source should now provide opportunities to overcome any such limitations (Sutton et al., 2007). Good progress has been made in identifying genes controlling B transport in and out of plants using Arabidopsis (Takano et al., 2006; Miwa et al., 2007), and the cloned barley B tolerance gene is a homolog of one of these genes. In rapeseed, QTLs have been identified for B efficiency, providing the opportunity to use MAS to select for this trait. Comparisons with B tolerance QTLs and genomic sequences in the corresponding regions of the closely related Arabidopsis genome should assist in the fine-mapping and ultimately the positional cloning of these rapeseed QTLs (Xu et al., 2001; Zeng et al., 2008).

QTLs for Tolerance to Low Nutrients

The increase in crop yields during the past century is attributed to the selection of genotypes with a higher yield potential and to the parallel increase in the application of fertilizers, particularly nitrogen (N; Borlaug and Dowswell, 2005). The sharp increase in energy cost has also made N fertilizer more expensive. Phosphorus (P) deficiency can also be a major factor limiting crop yield, particularly in low-input agricultural systems, including those of many developing countries. P presents a more critical situation for the long term, as it is a nonrenewable fertilizer that cannot be synthesized artificially like N. P reserves are expected to be completely depleted by the end of this century. Leaching of P and N into surface and sea water also causes environmental problems, including algal blooms. Clearly, increasing the efficiency with which crops utilize N and P represents an urgent priority for ensuring cost-effective and sustainable agriculture for the future.

Nitrogen Use Efficiency
In temperate maize, Gallais and coworkers (Bertin and Gallais, 2000, 2001; Hirel et al., 2001; Gallais and Hirel, 2004; Coque and Gallais, 2006; Hirel et al., 2007) identified a set of QTLs for N use efficiency, grain yield, and its components at high and low N levels. QTLs mapped in clusters and those identified under low N were generally a subset of those identified under high N, except for grain protein content, for which a higher number of QTLs were detected in low N. A number of genes that encode enzymes involved in N and C metabolism were close to QTLs for vegetative development and for grain yield and its components (Gallais and Hirel, 2004). These included genes for Gln synthetase (GS; Glu-ammonia ligase), Suc-P synthase, Suc synthase, and invertase (β-fructofuranosidase). The most notable outcomes of these studies were the colocation of a major grain yield QTL on chromosome 5 with the gene encoding cytosolic GS (gln4 locus) and the correlation between the expression levels of the gln4 alleles and the contributions of the respective QTL alleles at this locus. Other candidate genes encoding enzymes involved in N metabolism that colocated with N use efficiency QTLs were the two GS genes (gln1 and gln2) on chromosome 1 and the GS gene (gln3) on chromosome 4. Collectively, these results suggest that increased productivity in maize genotypes under low N may be due to their ability to accumulate nitrate in the leaves during vegetative growth and to efficiently remobilize the stored nitrate during grain filling.

In tropical maize, QTLs for grain yield and secondary traits under varying N and water supply were identified by Ribaut et al. (2007). A mapping population previously developed for identifying QTLs under water-limited conditions was evaluated under varying N and water regimes. Two of the eight grain yield QTLs identified under low N conditions were also detected under high N conditions. Five QTLs were stable across the two low N environments and five colocalized with QTLs identified for ASI or for the number of ears per plant under low N conditions. These results suggest that both ASI and the number of ears per plant can be selected for simultaneously to improve the performance of maize under low N and drought stress (Ribaut et al., 2007).

In wheat, a QTL meta-analysis and factorial regression were deployed to investigate QTL x N interactions, revealing influences of the three major phenological trait loci, Ppd-D1, Rht-B1, and B1, on N-related QTLs (Laperche et al., 2007). Additionally, QTL clusters for GS activity on wheat chromosomes 2A and 4A coincided with the location of GS and GSr genes, respectively, and although QTL alleles for higher GS activity were associated with higher grain N, they showed little or no effects on grain yield components (Habash et al., 2007). QTLs for tolerance to low N have also been described in Arabidopsis (Loudet et al., 2003), rice (Lian et al., 2005), and barley (Mickelson et al., 2003).

Phosphorus Use Efficiency
Because of the low mobility of P in the soil, extensive work has been carried out to investigate the effects of QTLs for root architecture on P uptake. Relevant QTLs have been identified in Arabidopsis (Reymond et al., 2006), common bean (Liao et al., 2004; Beebe et al., 2006; Ochoa et al., 2006), soybean (Kuang et al., 2005; Li et al., 2005), rice (Wissuwa et al., 2002; Shimizu et al., 2004), maize (Kaeppler et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2005, 2006), and wheat (Su et al., 2006).

A common feature of the above-mentioned studies is that the QTL alleles for high P efficiency were associated with greater root surface area due to an increase in either root mass or root hair density. Additionally, QTLs for P uptake in bean were found to influence H⁺ and total acid exudation from the root (Yan et al., 2004), two processes capable of mobilizing soil-bound P through soil P desorption or mineralization. In rice, MABC of the beneficial allele at Pup1, a major QTL on chromosome 12 for P uptake efficiency that was mapped to a 3-cM interval (Wissuwa et al., 2002), provided a 3- to 4-fold increase in P uptake (Wissuwa et al., 2005). A segregation analysis using several pairs of contrasting NILs at the Pup1 locus confirmed that Pup1 cosegregated with external uptake efficiency but not with seedling root growth (Wissuwa et al., 2005). Although fine mapping had delimited Pup1 to a relatively small interval (approximately 240 kb), the large number (>60) of genes in this region has so far prevented the identification of the Pup1 controlling gene (Ismail et al., 2008).

	CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER?

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
Although QTL cloning remains a cumbersome procedure, several reasons justify such a daunting undertaking. The sequence of a cloned QTL gene offers the perfect marker for MAS and provides the template for the identification of potentially superior allelic variants in the crop species or wild progenitors via EcoTILLING (Till et al., 2007). Modifying the expression of the gene by genetic engineering could also provide superior tolerance. Putatively identified and cloned genes relating to stress tolerance loci are listed in Table I . The cloning of further genes and expression QTLs relating to changes in mRNA levels under abiotic stress will shed further light on the relative importance of cis- and trans-regulation in governing the expression of key structural genes and their impact on yield (Potokina et al., 2008). Positional cloning has been the approach most frequently used to clone QTLs (Salvi and Tuberosa, 2005; Bortiri et al., 2006). Because accurate phenotyping is the most critical factor for fully dissecting QTLs, positional cloning is largely limited to traits with high heritability and to QTLs with large effects that can be easily Mendelized. Accordingly, QTLs with major effects on flowering time have been positionally cloned in rice (Yano et al., 2000; Takahashi et al., 2001; Kojima et al., 2002; Doi et al., 2004) and maize (Salvi et al., 2007). Early-flowering alleles are of interest for providing escape from late-season drought episodes.

For the cloned and putatively identified plant genes relating to abiotic stress tolerance (Table I), and related traits, a difference in the level of transcription, rather than differences in protein sequence and function, appears to be the most common basis for the functional difference between naturally occurring alleles. Therefore, allelic differences in mRNA expression levels are likely to remain a very useful criterion when identifying candidate genes. Transcriptome profiling from model or target crop species can also be used to identify candidates (Giuliani et al., 2005a; Guo et al., 2007; Poroyko et al., 2007). However, the power of this information alone in QTL cloning is limited by the large number of genes that usually show expression differences related to stress treatment, genotype, or source tissue. One example of where such information has led to the identification of a stress tolerance QTL is provided by the CBF genes. Interest in CBF genes arose from observations that they are induced by stress, regulate other stress-responsive genes, and confer tolerance when overexpressed in transgenic plants (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000), while more direct genetic evidence for a contribution of these genes to cold tolerance in wild-type plants was obtained only later by QTL mapping and mutant analysis (Alonso-Blanco et al., 2005; Båga et al., 2007; Francia et al., 2007; Novillo et al., 2007). Integration of information obtained from different genomic approaches, including protein-protein interaction studies and transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome profiling, will allow better understanding of regulatory networks in plants (Gutierrez et al., 2005) and better prediction of genes likely to be critical in determining phentoypes.

The set of candidates can be narrowed by knowledge of the genes present in a QTL interval/region defined by linkage/association mapping. Gene content can be known directly from genomic sequence when available. In unsequenced genomes, most of the gene content of an interval can be predicted by exploiting the partial conservation in gene content and order that exists between many crops and sequenced species (e.g. between rapeseed and the Arabidopsis sequence and between the large-genome cereals barley and wheat and the sequences of rice and the model grass Brachypodium distachyon). Once the corresponding interval in the sequenced genome is identified by mapping of homologous flanking genes, the genes within the sequenced interval can be scrutinized for likely candidates as well as used for targeted marker generation to further delimit the interval. While the wheat HKT7 gene and barley and sorghum MATE genes were colinear with rice, rye, and wheat ALMT1 genes, barley Bot1 and wheat HKT1;5 genes were not, despite good overall levels of colinearity directly around these loci (Huang et al., 2006; Byrt et al., 2007; Furukawa et al., 2007; Magalhaes et al., 2007; Sutton et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Collins et al., 2008). Further cases will need to be tested to verify whether or not abiotic stress tolerance genes break colinearity more often than other types of genes.

	COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND MODELING

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
The above sections illustrate the complexity of adaptive traits. Component traits may vary with environmental conditions within a time frame of some seconds (e.g. stomatal conductance or tissue water potential) to several weeks (e.g. no. of lateral roots). The genetic analysis of such highly variable traits needs a strategy to cope with the temporal variability of phenotypes. One strategy involves interpreting networks of field trials using a statistical method that calculates QTL x environment interactions (Malosetti et al., 2006). A second strategy involves identifying intrinsic characteristics of each genotype relating to its interaction with particular environmental conditions. This requires the development of models able to identify these variables and to simulate the behavior of genotypes in a large range of environmental conditions. Ecophysiological models calculate quantitative phenotypic traits (e.g. transpiration rate, expansion rate of organs, or biomass accumulation) from environmental inputs such as organ temperature, light irradiance, and soil water potential. It is assumed that the network of gene regulation is coordinated in such a way that a plant reacts in a predictable way to a given environmental condition, giving way to a "meta-mechanism" at the whole plant level (Tardieu, 2003).

For example, an approach has been developed for the identification and genetic analysis of the sensitivity of maize leaf growth to environmental conditions (Reymond et al., 2003; Sadok et al., 2007; Chenu et al., 2008). First, it involved establishing response curves of leaf elongation rate to temperature, evaporative demand, and soil water status, which were stable characteristics of the genotypes in different experimental conditions. The parameters of these responses were calculated for lines of mapping populations and were then analyzed genetically (Reymond et al., 2003; Welcker et al., 2007). This allowed the simulation of leaf growth in novel inbred lines as defined by their QTL alleles (Reymond et al., 2003; Sadok et al., 2007). This approach, therefore, allows the identification of QTLs of plant responses that, in principle, should not include a genotype-environment interaction. It theoretically allows one to predict the performance of any "virtual genotype" with a given combination of alleles in any climatic scenario. This possibility is a promising avenue, but is limited at present to very simple traits and genetic systems.

More integrative models simulate crop development as a function of environmental conditions. Consequently, they allow for the evaluation of the effects of individual traits on the seasonal dynamics of crop water use and carbon assimilation (Chapman et al., 2003; Yin et al., 2004). However, their algorithms remain relatively crude, so the effects of genes or QTLs usually cannot be simulated at the crop level except for constitutive traits (e.g. phenology; Chapman et al., 2003; Yin et al., 2005), for binary traits related to environmental triggers (e.g. flowering response to photoperiod; Hoogenboom et al., 2004), or when QTL models at the organ level can be combined with crop models (Chenu et al., 2008). Their main function until now has been to evaluate whether a given trait will have a positive effect over a long series of climatic scenarios. For instance, Hammer et al. (2005) simulated the effect of stay-green, a trait considered to confer drought tolerance, across 547 location-season combinations. As expected, this trait had a positive effect under midseason or terminal stress but a negative effect under severe terminal stress. The value of this approach is to quantify the potential value of a trait in a given environment by considering current and projected climatic patterns. Additionally, the same approach allows us to virtually gauge the effect of a QTL and/or a QTL combination and, consequently, to elaborate and test long-term selection schemes that cannot otherwise be compared in the "real world."

	THE WAY AHEAD

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
Genomics-assisted improvement of abiotic stress tolerance of crops will increasingly rely on the QTL approach. The systematic dissection of QTLs governing the naturally occurring variation relevant for crop yield and its sustainability will facilitate a more targeted and effective tailoring of cultivars with an improved performance under abiotic constraints (Baum et al., 2007; Dwivedi et al., 2007; Mackill, 2007; Xu and Crouch, 2008). Nonetheless, it is difficult to predict to what extent QTL-based MAS will affect breeding practices aimed at improving tolerance to abiotic stresses. The first tangible examples of such effects have been presented here.

The identification and cloning of QTLs may be facilitated in the future by a number of factors, namely: (1) the constant improvement of molecular platforms (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism profiling, "-omics" profiling, yeast one- or two-hybrid screens, chromatin immunoprecipitation, tiling arrays, etc. [Varshney and Tuberosa, 2007]) and mapping approaches (e.g. association mapping [Ersoz et al., 2007]); (2) new types of genetic materials (e.g. multiparental schemes [Yu et al., 2008] and advanced backcross mapping populations using wild relatives [Grandillo et al., 2007]); (3) progress in bioinformatics (e.g. functional maps [Gardiner et al., 2004; Falque et al., 2005] and comparative mapping [Salse and Feuillet, 2007]); (4) accurate, high-throughput phenotyping (Granier et al., 2006; Sadok et al., 2007) coupled with modeling that allows the prediction of allele functions in new environments (Tardieu, 2003; Hammer et al., 2006; Cooper et al., 2007); and (5) increasing availability of sequence information (e.g. "deep" sequencing of DNA and mRNA [Chen et al., 2007; Torres et al., 2008]) and tools for functionally testing candidate genes (e.g. TILLING [Till et al., 2007] and RNA interference [Lukens and Zhan, 2007]). In polyploid species, high-resolution mapping using radiation-induced deletion lines (Kalavacharla et al., 2006) offers a useful route to cloning QTLs in regions that are low in polymorphism or recombination. In maize, a substantial advancement in QTL discovery and cloning has been made possible through the adoption of the nested-association mapping (NAM) system (Yu et al., 2008). Combining QTL mapping based on 25 biparental recombinant inbred line populations (25 founders crossed with a common tester) with association mapping based on a panel of approximately 300 lines, Buckler and coworkers (Yu et al., 2008) assembled the most powerful QTL dissection platform devised for any species. The first results obtained using this NAM platform have validated the value of this strategy (Buckler, 2008), the only limiting factor being the phenotyping of approximately 5,000 lines required to take full advantage of the scheme. As in general association mapping, the mapping resolution offered by NAM largely depends on the linkage disequilibrium (LD) among the founder individuals. Given the diversity of these 25 maize founders and the rapid LD decay (approximately 2 kb), a high mapping resolution is expected for NAM. With the NAM strategy, the improvement in resolution due to the rapid decay of LD is thus fully exploited while avoiding its drawbacks (e.g. the need for strong candidate genes or a large no. of markers) by projecting the genomic information from the founders to the recombinant inbred lines (Yu et al., 2008). However, if the effects of the QTLs are too small, combining them by MAS to achieve a significant improvement may be impractical and would constrain the potential to achieve yield gain at other loci. In such a case, it may be preferable to simply select for the phenotype or yield itself rather than to attempt to manipulate the trait by MAS at multiple loci (Bernardo et al., 2006).

Arabidopsis and other model plants (e.g. Brachypodium, Medicago truncatula, etc.) will continue to offer insights into the genetic and biochemical basis of adaptation to abiotic stress (Bohnert et al., 2006) and will provide opportunities to verify the function of candidate genes. Attractive features of Arabidopsis as a model are the availability of a well-annotated sequence, a wealth of genetic materials and -omics data, a very short life cycle, and the possibility to phenotype at a fraction of the cost required for crops. An interesting example is the identification in Arabidopsis of QTLs controlling the plasticity of root architecture (Loudet et al., 2005; Gerald et al., 2006; Sergeeva et al., 2006), a crucial factor for optimizing crop performance under a number of abiotic constraints (de Dorlodot et al., 2007). Equally worthy of exploration will be the identification of QTLs regulating signal transduction in response to environmental cues (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2007) and the ensuing modifications in gene expression (Sunkar et al., 2007). To what extent this knowledge will affect the release of better performing crops will depend on our capacity to identify the crops' orthologs at the relevant loci and to properly evaluate their effects in crops under stressed conditions (Nelson et al., 2007).

We anticipate a growing interest in wild relatives of crops and landraces in an attempt to identify superior alleles among those that the domestication bottleneck and modern agriculture have left behind (Tanksley and McCouch, 1997; Grandillo et al., 2007; Lippman et al., 2007; Feuillet et al., 2008). Advanced backcross QTL analysis (Tanksley and Nelson, 1996) will be instrumental in identifying agronomically superior alleles not present within the elite germplasm. To this end, introgression libraries based on wild relatives and/or landraces as donors provide a wealth of valuable opportunities (Gur et al., 2004). A QTL approach based on wide crosses will facilitate gene discovery and will shed light on the mechanisms that allow plants to adapt to harsh environments.

Likewise, a model-based approach following a simplified framework of the components interacting at the physiological and developmental levels could facilitate the identification of the most promising entry variables (Tardieu, 2003; Hammer et al., 2006; Cooper et al., 2007), that is, the genes/QTLs to preferentially act upon. Particularly challenging examples are provided by gene interactions at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels, metabolic fluxes, key developmental steps, and their integrated responses to environmental cues. Increasing evidence suggests an important role of epigenesis (Matzke et al., 2007; Perruc et al., 2007) and RNA interference (Chinnusamy et al., 2007; Sunkar et al., 2007) in the regulation of gene expression under stress conditions. High-throughput proteomic approaches promise to shed light on the complexities of posttranslational events and how these may influence functional variability (Briggs et al., 2008). Although reverse genetics approaches are likely to become increasingly popular as more annotated sequences become available, a complete understanding of natural variation will only come by studying functional differences between natural alleles, including variation in noncoding regions (Magalhaes et al., 2007; Salvi et al., 2007). Therefore, while the candidate gene approach should be explored whenever the opportunity arises, forward genetics approaches, such as positional cloning of natural QTLs, will continue to play a prevailing role in providing quantum leaps in our understanding of the molecular control of stress tolerance. Ultimately, integration of QTL information into a breeding pipeline aimed at improving tolerance to abiotic stresses will best be achieved within a multidisciplinary context able to provide the operational framework required to correctly link the stress-responsive mechanisms of crops with the functional variation of the relevant networks at the cellular and molecular levels.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
Nick Collins (ACPFG) was funded by the ARC, the GRDC, the SA Government, and the University of Adelaide. This review partially arose from discussions during a 5-month visit of Roberto Tuberosa to ACPFG. François Tardieu was funded by the ANR-Genoplante programme Waterless and the Generation Challenge Programme.

Received February 19, 2008; accepted April 11, 2008; published June 6, 2008.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Roberto Tuberosa (roberto.tuberosa{at}unibo.it).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.118117

^* Corresponding author; e-mail roberto.tuberosa{at}unibo.it.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP UNVEILING THE NATURE OF... CASE STUDIES IN QTL... CLONING QTLS: WHY BOTHER? COMBINING QTLS, PHENOTYPING, AND... THE WAY AHEAD LITERATURE CITED

 
Alonso-Blanco C, Gomez-Mena C, Llorente F, Koornneef M, Salinas J, Martínez-Zapater JM (2005) Genetic and molecular analyses of natural variation indicate CBF2 as a candidate gene for underlying a freezing tolerance quantitative trait locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139: 1304–1312[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Andaya VC, Tai TH (2006) Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 113: 467–475[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Asghari A, Mohammadi SA, Moghaddam M, Mohammaddoost HR (2007) QTL analysis for cold resistance-related traits in Brassica napus using RAPD markers. J Food Agric Environ 5: 188–192

Bacon MA (2004) Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Blackwell, Oxford

Båga M, Chodaparambil SV, Limin AE, Pecar M, Fowler DB, Chibbar RN (2007) Identification of quantitative trait loci and associated candidate genes for low-temperature tolerance in cold-hardy winter wheat. Funct Integr Genomics 7: 53–68[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bagci SA, Ekiz H, Yilmaz A, Cakmak I (2007) Effects of zinc deficiency and drought on grain yield of field-grown wheat cultivars in Central Anatolia. J Agron Crop Sci 193: 198–206[CrossRef]

Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A (2008) The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ 31: 11–38[Medline]

Baum M, Von Korff M, Guo P, Lakew B, Udupa SM, Sayed H, Choumane W, Grando S, Ceccarelli S (2007) Molecular approaches and breeding strategies for drought tolerance in barley. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 2: Genomics Applications in Crops. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 51–80

Beavis WD (1998) QTL analysis: power, precision, and accuracy. In AH Paterson, ed, Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 145–162

Beebe SE, Rojas-Pierce M, Yan XL, Blair MW, Pedraza F, Munoz F, Tohme J, Lynch JP (2006) Quantitative trait loci for root architecture traits correlated with phosphorus acquisition in common bean. Crop Sci 46: 413–423[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernardo R, Moreau L, Charcosset A (2006) Number and fitness of selected individuals in marker-assisted and phenotypic recurrent selection. Crop Sci 46: 1972–1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernardo R, Yu JM (2007) Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci 47: 1082–1090[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernier J, Kumar A, Ramaiah V, Spaner D, Atlin G (2007) A large-effect QTL for grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress in upland rice. Crop Sci 47: 507–518[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bertin P, Gallais A (2000) Physiological and genetic basis of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. I. Agrophysiological results. Maydica 45: 53–66[Web of Science]

Bertin P, Gallais A (2001) Genetic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in a set of recombinant inbred lines. II. QTL detection and coincidences. Maydica 46: 53–68[Web of Science]

Bianchi-Hall CM, Carter TE, Bailey MA, Mian MAR, Rufty TW, Ashley DA, Boerma HR, Arellano C, Hussey RS, Parrott WA (2000) Aluminum tolerance associated with quantitative trait loci derived from soybean PI 416937 in hydroponics. Crop Sci 40: 538–545[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bidinger FR, Nepolean T, Hash CT, Yadav RS, Howarth CJ (2007) Quantitative trait loci for grain yield in pearl millet under variable postflowering moisture conditions. Crop Sci 47: 969–980[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blum A (1988) Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential: Are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res 56: 1159–1168[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Bohnert HJ, Gong QQ, Li PH, Ma SS (2006) Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms: getting genomics going. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 180–188[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bolaños J, Edmeades GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization. Field Crops Res 31: 233–252[CrossRef]

Bolaños J, Edmeades GO (1996) The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Res 48: 65–80[CrossRef]

Borlaug NE (2007) Sixty-two years of fighting hunger: personal recollections. Euphytica 157: 287–297[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Borlaug NE, Dowswell CR (2005) Feeding a world of ten billion people: a 21st century challenge. In R Tuberosa, RL Phillips, M Gale, eds, Proceedings of the International Congress in the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution, 27–31 May 2003, Bologna, Italy. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy, pp 3–23

Borrell A, Hammer G, Van Oosterom E (2001) Stay-green: a consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Ann Appl Biol 138: 91–95[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Bortiri E, Jackson D, Hake S (2006) Advances in maize genomics: the emergence of positional cloning. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 164–171[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Briggs SP, Shen Z, Bafna V, Payne S, Castellana N, Li X, Bellafiore S, Lagor K (2008) A short history of molecular markers and a glimpse of what may come. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Molecular Mapping and Marker Assisted Selection in Plants, February 3–6, Vienna, Austria. Organizing Committee, Vienna, p 17

Bruce WB, Edmeades GO, Barker TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 53: 13–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buckler E (2008) Association mapping of diverse maize by candidate genes and whole genome scanning (abstract no. W428). In Abstracts of Plant and Animal Genome XVI, January 12–16, San Diego, CA. Scherago International, Jersey City, NJ, p 101

Byrt CS, Platten JD, Spielmeyer W, James RA, Lagudah ES, Dennis ES, Tester M, Munns R (2007) HKT1;5-like cation transporters linked to Na+ exclusion loci in wheat, Nax2 and Kna1. Plant Physiol 143: 1918–1928[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Campos H, Cooper A, Habben JE, Edmeades GO, Schussler JR (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res 90: 19–34[CrossRef]

Caniato FF, Guimarães CT, Schaffert RE, Alves VMC, Kochian LV, Borém A, Klein PE, Magalhaes JV (2007) Genetic diversity for aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 114: 863–876[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Capell T, Christou P (2004) Progress in plant metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15: 148–154[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chapman S, Cooper M, Podlich D, Hammer G (2003) Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects. Agron J 95: 99–113[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen J, Agrawal V, Rattray M, Al West M, St Clair DA, Michelmore RW, Coughlan SJ, Meyers BC (2007) A comparison of microarray and MPSS technology platforms for expression analysis of Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics 8: 414[CrossRef][Medline]

Chenu K, Chapman SC, Hammer GL, McLean G, Ben Haj Salah H, Tardieu F (2008) Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. Plant Cell Environ 31: 378–391[CrossRef]

Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhou T, Zhu J-K (2007) Small RNAs: big role in abiotic stress tolerance of plants. In MA Jenks, PM Hasegawa, SM Jain, eds, Advances in Molecular Breeding toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 223–260

Collins NC, Shirley NJ, Saeed M, Pallotta M, Gustafson JP (2008) An ALMT1 gene cluster controlling aluminium (aluminum) tolerance at the Alt4 locus of rye (Secale cereale L.). Genetics (in press)

Colmer TD, Flowers TJ, Munns R (2006) Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot 57: 1059–1078[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55: 2447–2460[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cooper M, Podlich DW, Luo L (2007) Modeling QTL effects and MAS in plant breeding. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 57–96

Coque M, Gallais A (2006) Genomic regions involved in response to grain yield selection at high and low nitrogen fertilization in maize. Theor Appl Genet 112: 1205–1220[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Courtois B, McLaren G, Sinha PK, Prasad K, Yadav R, Shen L (2000) Mapping QTLs associated with drought avoidance in upland rice. Mol Breed 6: 55–66[CrossRef]

de Dorlodot S, Forster B, Pages L, Price A, Tuberosa R, Draye X (2007) Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci 12: 474–481[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dhanda SS, Munjal R (2006) Inheritance of cellular thermotolerance in bread wheat. Plant Breed 125: 557–564[CrossRef]

Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatani Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A (2004) Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev 18: 926–936[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ducrocq S, Madur D, Veyrieras JB, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Kloiber-Maitz M, Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Manicacci D, Charcosset A (2008) Key impact of Vgt1 on flowering time adaptation in maize: evidence from association mapping and ecogeographical information. Genetics 178: 1–5[Free Full Text]

Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron 86: 83–145[CrossRef]

Dwivedi SL, Crouch JH, Mackill DJ, Xu Y, Blair MW, Ragot M, Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R (2007) The molecularization of public sector crop breeding: progress, problems, and prospects. In DL Sparks, ed, Advances in Agronomy, Vol 95. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 163–318

Eglinton JK, Reid RJ, Hayes JE, Davies P, Jha D, McDonald G (2004) Boron toxicity in barley: prospects for delivering a yield advantage. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 40: 166

Ersoz ES, Yu J, Buckler ES (2007) Applications of linkage disequilibrium and association mapping. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 97–120

Falque M, Decousset L, Dervins D, Jacob AM, Joets J, Martinant JP, Raffoux X, Ribiere N, Ridel C, Samson D, et al (2005) Linkage mapping of 1454 new maize candidate gene loci. Genetics 170: 1957–1966[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40: 503–537[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Feuillet C, Langridge P, Waugh R (2008) Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends Genet 24: 24–32[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Flowers TJ, Flowers SA (2005) Why does salinity pose such a difficult problem for plant breeders? Agric Water Manage 78: 15–24[CrossRef]

Fontecha G, Silva-Navas J, Benito C, Mestres MA, Espino FJ, Hernandez-Riquer MV, Gallego FJ (2007) Candidate gene identification of an aluminum-activated organic acid transporter gene at the Alt4 locus for aluminum tolerance in rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor Appl Genet 114: 249–260[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Francia E, Barabaschi D, Tondelli A, Laidò G, Rizza F, Stanca AM, Busconi M, Fogher C, Stockinger EJ, Pecchioni N (2007) Fine mapping of a HvCBF gene cluster at the frost resistance locus Fr-H2 in barley. Theor Appl Genet 115: 1083–1091[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fresneau C, Ghashghaie J, Cornic G (2007) Drought effect on nitrate reductase and sucrose-phosphate synthase activities in wheat (Triticum durum L.): role of leaf internal CO₂. J Exp Bot 58: 2983–2992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frova C, Sari-Gorla M (1994) Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for pollen thermotolerance detected in maize. Mol Gen Genet 245: 424–430[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fuller MP, Fuller AM, Kaniouras S, Christophers J, Fredericks T (2007) The freezing characteristics of wheat at ear emergence. Eur J Agron 26: 435–441[CrossRef]

Furukawa J, Yamaji N, Wang H, Mitani N, Murata Y, Sato K, Katsuhara M, Takeda K, Ma JF (2007) An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley. Plant Cell Physiol 48: 1081–1091[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Galiba G, Pecchioni N, Vágújfalvi A, Francia E, Tóth B, Barabaschi D, Barilli S, Crosatti C, Cattivelli L, Stanca MA (2005) Localization of QTLs and candidate genes involved in the regulation of frost resistance in cereals. In R Tuberosa, RL Phillips, M Gale, eds, Proceedings of the International Congress in the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution, 27–31 May 2003, Bologna, Italy. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy, pp 253–266

Gallais A, Hirel B (2004) An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. J Exp Bot 55: 295–306[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardiner J, Schroeder S, Polacco ML, Sanchez-Villeda H, Fang Z, Morgante M, Landewe T, Fengler K, Useche F, Hanafey M, et al (2004) Anchoring 9,371 maize expressed sequence tagged unigenes to the bacterial artificial chromosome contig map by two-dimensional overgo hybridization. Plant Physiol 134: 1317–1326[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garg AK, Kim JK, Owens TG, Ranwala AP, Choi YD, Kochian LV, Wu RJ (2002) Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 15898–15903[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gelin JP, Forster S, Grafton KF, McClean PE, Kooas-Cifuentes GA (2007) Analysis of seed zinc and other minerals in a recombinant inbred population of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Sci 47: 1361–1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Genc Y, McDonald GK, Tester M (2007) Reassessment of tissue Na⁺ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1486–1498[CrossRef][Medline]

Gerald JNF, Lehti-Shiu MD, Ingram PA, Deak KI, Biesiada T, Malamy JE (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci that regulate Arabidopsis root system size and plasticity. Genetics 172: 485–498[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Giuliani S, Clarke J, Kreps JA, Sanguineti MC, Salvi S, Landi P, Zhu T, Tuberosa R (2005a) Microarray analysis of backcrossed-derived lines differing for root-ABA1, a major QTL controlling root characteristics and ABA concentration in maize. In R Tuberosa, RL Phillips, M Gale, eds, Proceedings of the International Congress in the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution, 27–31 May 2003, Bologna, Italy. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy, pp 463–490

Giuliani S, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R, Bellotti M, Salvi S, Landi P (2005b) Root-ABA1, a major constitutive QTL, affects maize root architecture and leaf ABA concentration at different water regimes. J Exp Bot 56: 3061–3070[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goodstal FJ, Kohler GR, Randall LB, Bloom AJ, St Clair DA (2005) A major QTL introgressed from wild Lycopersicon hirsutum confers chilling tolerance to cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor Appl Genet 111: 898–905[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Graham R, Senadhira D, Beebe S, Iglesias C, Monasterio I (1999) Breeding for micronutrient density in edible portions of staple food crops: conventional approaches. Field Crops Res 60: 57–80[CrossRef]

Grandillo S, Tanksley SD, Zamir D (2007) Exploitation of natural biodiversity through genomics. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 121–150

Granier C, Aguirrezabal L, Chenu K, Cookson SJ, Dauzat M, Hamard P, Thioux JJ, Rolland G, Bouchier-Combaud S, Lebaudy A, et al (2006) PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol 169: 623–635[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Guo PG, Bai GH, Carver B, Li RH, Bernardo A, Baum M (2007) Transcriptional analysis between two wheat near-isogenic lines contrasting in aluminum tolerance under aluminum stress. Mol Genet Genomics 277: 1–12[Web of Science][Medline]

Gur A, Semel Y, Cahaner A, Zamir D (2004) Real time QTL of complex phenotypes in tomato interspecific introgression lines. Trends Plant Sci 9: 107–109[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gutierrez RA, Shasha DE, Coruzzi GM (2005) Systems biology for the virtual plant. Plant Physiol 138: 550–554[Free Full Text]

Ha BK, Hussey RS, Boerma HR (2007) Development of SNP assays for marker-assisted selection of two southern root-knot nematode resistance QTL in soybean. Crop Sci (Suppl) 47: S73–S82

Habash DZ, Bernard S, Schondelmaier J, Weyen J, Quarrie SA (2007) The genetics of nitrogen use in hexaploid wheat: N utilisation, development and yield. Theor Appl Genet 114: 403–419[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hall NM, Griffiths H, Corlett JA, Jones HG, Lynn J, King GJ (2005) Relationships between water-use traits and photosynthesis in Brassica oleracea resolved by quantitative genetic analysis. Plant Breed 124: 557–564[CrossRef]

Hammer G, Cooper M, Tardieu F, Welch S, Walsh B, van Eeuwijk F, Chapman S, Podlich D (2006) Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci 11: 587–593[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hammer GL, Chapman S, van Oosterom E, Podlich DW (2005) Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Aust J Agric Res 56: 947–960[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Harris K, Subudhi PK, Borrell A, Jordan D, Rosenow D, Nguyen H, Klein P, Klein R, Mullet J (2007) Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 58: 327–338[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirel B, Bertin P, Quiller I, Bourdoncle W, Attagnant C, Dellay C, Gouy A, Cadiou S, Retailliau C, Falque M, et al (2001) Towards a better understanding of the genetic and physiological basis for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Physiol 125: 1258–1270[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirel B, Le Gouis J, Ney B, Gallais A (2007) The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J Exp Bot 58: 2369–2387[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoekenga OA, Maron LG, Piñeros MA, Cancado GMA, Shaff J, Kobayashi Y, Ryan PR, Dong B, Delhaize E, Sasaki T, et al (2006) AtALMT1, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 9738–9743[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hong SW, Lee U, Vierling E (2003) Arabidopsis hot mutants define multiple functions required for acclimation to high temperatures. Plant Physiol 132: 757–767[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoogenboom G, White JW, Messina CD (2004) From genome to crop: integration through simulation modeling. Field Crops Res 90: 145–163[CrossRef]

Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147: 1469–1485[Abstract]

Hospital F, Goldringer I, Openshaw S (2000) Efficient marker-based recurrent selection for multiple quantitative trait loci. Genet Res 75: 357–368[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hsieh TH, Lee JT, Charng YY, Chan MT (2002) Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress. Plant Physiol 130: 618–626[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang SB, Spielmeyer W, Lagudah ES, James RA, Platten JD, Dennis ES, Munns R (2006) A sodium transporter (HKT7) is a candidate for Nax1, a gene for salt tolerance in durum wheat. Plant Physiol 142: 1718–1727[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hund A, Frascaroli E, Leipner J, Jompuk C, Stamp P, Fracheboud Y (2005) Cold tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus: pleiotropic relationship between photosynthetic performance and specific leaf area of maize seedlings. Mol Breed 16: 321–331[CrossRef]

Ismail AM, Heuer S, Thomson MJ, Wissuwa M (2007) Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils. Plant Mol Biol 65: 547–570[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ismail AM, Thomson MJ, Ching J-H, Septiningsih E, Wissuwa M, Heuer S, Singh RK, Gregorio GB, Mackill DJ (2008) Introgression of QTLs associated with tolerance to abiotic stresses in rice using marker-assisted breeding (abstract no. W233). In Abstracts of Plant and Animal Genome XVI, January 12–16, San Diego, CA. Scherago International, Jersey City, NJ, p 55

Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Taji T, Naramoto M, Seki M, Kato T, Tabata S, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2001) Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 27: 325–333[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

James RA, Davenport RJ, Munns R (2006) Physiological characterization of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat, Nax1 and Nax2. Plant Physiol 142: 1537–1547[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jefferies SP, Barr AR, Karakousis A, Kretschmer JM, Manning S, Chalmers KJ, Nelson JC, Islam A, Langridge P (1999) Mapping of chromosome regions conferring boron toxicity tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 98: 1293–1303[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Jefferies SP, Pallotta MA, Paull JG, Karakousis A, Kretschmer JM, Manning S, Islam A, Langridge P, Chalmers KJ (2000) Mapping and validation of chromosome regions conferring boron toxicity tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Theor Appl Genet 101: 767–777[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Mohan Jain S (2007) Advances in Molecular Breeding toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Jompuk C, Fracheboud Y, Stamp P, Leipner J (2005) Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with chilling tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under field conditions. J Exp Bot 56: 1153–1163[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaeppler SM, Parke JL, Mueller SM, Senior L, Stuber C, Tracy WF (2000) Variation among maize inbred lines and detection of quantitative trait loci for growth at low phosphorus and responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crop Sci 40: 358–364[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kahraman A, Kusmenoglu I, Aydin N, Aydogan A, Erskine W, Muehlbauer FJ (2004) QTL mapping of winter hardiness genes in lentil. Crop Sci 44: 13–22[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kalavacharla V, Hossain K, Gu Y, Riera-Lizarazu O, Vales MI, Bhamidimarri S, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Maan SS, Kianian SF (2006) High-resolution radiation hybrid map of wheat chromosome 1D. Genetics 173: 1089–1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Knoll J, Ejeta G (2008) Marker-assisted selection for early-season cold tolerance in sorghum: QTL validation across populations and environments. Theor Appl Genet 116: 541–553[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kochian LV, Piñeros MA, Hoekenga OA (2005) The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant Soil 274: 175–195[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Monna L, Sasaki T, Araki T, Yano M (2002) Hd3a, a rice orthologue of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 1096–1105[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuang RB, Liao H, Yan XL, Dong YS (2005) Phosphorus and nitrogen interactions in field-grown soybean as related to genetic attributes of root morphological and nodular traits. J Integr Plant Biol 47: 549–559[CrossRef]

Kuroki M, Saito K, Matsuba S, Yokogami N, Shimizu H, Ando I, Sato Y (2007) A quantitative trait locus for cold tolerance at the booting stage on rice chromosome 8. Theor Appl Genet 115: 593–600[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Landi P, Sanguineti MC, Liu C, Li Y, Wang TY, Giuliani S, Bellotti M, Salvi S, Tuberosa R (2007) Root-ABA1 QTL affects root lodging, grain yield, and other agronomic traits in maize grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. J Exp Bot 58: 319–326[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Landi P, Sanguineti MC, Salvi S, Giuliani S, Bellotti M, Maccaferri M, Conti S, Tuberosa R (2005) Validation and characterization of a major QTL affecting leaf ABA concentration in maize. Mol Breed 15: 291–303[CrossRef]

Langridge P (2005) Molecular breeding of wheat and barley. In R Tuberosa, RL Phillips, M Gale, eds, Proceedings of the International Congress in the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution, 27–31 May 2003, Bologna, Italy. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy, pp 279–286

Laperche A, Brancourt-Hulmel M, Heumez E, Gardet O, Hanocq E, Devienne-Barret F, Le Gouis J (2007) Using genotype x nitrogen interaction variables to evaluate the QTL involved in wheat tolerance to nitrogen constraints. Theor Appl Genet 115: 399–415[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Laza MR, Kondo M, Ideta O, Barlaan E, Imbe T (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci for C-13 and productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Crop Sci 46: 763–773[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LeDeaux JR, Graham GI, Stuber CW (2006) Stability of QTLs involved in heterosis in maize when mapped under several stress conditions. Maydica 51: 151–167[Web of Science]

Lee SH, Ahsana N, Lee KW, Kim DH, Lee DG, Kwak SS, Kwon SY, Kim TH, Lee BH (2007) Simultaneous overexpression of both CuZn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in transgenic tall fescue plants confers increased tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 164: 1626–1638[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Li YD, Wang YJ, Tong YP, Gao JG, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2005) QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Euphytica 142: 137–142[CrossRef]

Lian XM, Xing YZ, Yan H, Xu CG, Li XH, Zhang QF (2005) QTLs for low nitrogen tolerance at seedling stage identified using a recombinant inbred line population derived from an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 112: 85–96[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Liao H, Yan XL, Rubio G, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean. Funct Plant Biol 31: 959–970[CrossRef]

Lippman ZB, Semel Y, Zamir D (2007) An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 545–552[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lou QJ, Chen L, Sun ZX, Xing YZ, Li J, Xu XY, Mei HW, Luo LJ (2007) A major QTL associated with cold tolerance at seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 158: 87–94[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Loudet O, Chaillou S, Merigout P, Talbotec J, Daniel-Vedele F (2003) Quantitative trait loci analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 131: 345–358[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Loudet O, Gaudon V, Trubuil A, Daniel-Vedele F (2005) Quantitative trait loci controlling root growth and architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana confirmed by heterogeneous inbred family. Theor Appl Genet 110: 742–753[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lukens LN, Zhan SH (2007) The plant genome's methylation status and response to stress: implications for plant improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10: 317–322[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Corneti S, Araus Ortega JL, Ben Salem M, Bort J, DeAmbrogio E, Garcia del Moral LF, Demontis A, El-Ahmed A, et al (2008) Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and adaptation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) across a wide range of water availability. Genetics 178: 489–511[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mackill DJ (2007) Molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in rice. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 2: Genomics Applications in Crops. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 147–168

MacMillan K, Emrich K, Piepho HP, Mullins CE, Price AH (2006) Assessing the importance of genotype x environment interaction for root traits in rice using a mapping population. I: A soil-filled box screen. Theor Appl Genet 113: 977–986[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Magalhaes JV, Liu J, Guimarães CT, Lana UGP, Alves VMC, Wang YH, Schaffert RE, Hoekenga OA, Piñeros MA, Shaff JE, et al (2007) A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nat Genet 39: 1156–1161[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Malosetti M, Visser RGF, Celis-Gamboa C, van Eeuwijk FA (2006) QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato. Theor Appl Genet 113: 288–300[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mamun EA, Alfred S, Cantrill LC, Overall RL, Sutton BG (2006) Effects of chilling on male gametophyte development in rice. Cell Biol Int 30: 583–591[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature 436: 866–870[CrossRef][Medline]

Matos M, Camacho MV, Pérez-Flores V, Pernaute B, Pinto-Carnide O, Benito C (2005) A new aluminum tolerance gene located on rye chromosome arm 7RS. Theor Appl Genet 111: 360–369[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Matzke M, Kanno T, Huettel B, Daxinger L, Matzke AJM (2007) Targets of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10: 512–519[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu D-T, Santoni V (2008) Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 595–624[CrossRef][Medline]

McLaughlin JE, Boyer JS (2004a) Glucose localization in maize ovaries when kernel number decreases at low water potential and sucrose is fed to the stems. Ann Bot (Lond) 94: 75–86[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McLaughlin JE, Boyer JS (2004b) Sugar-responsive gene expression, invertase activity, and senescence in aborting maize ovaries at low water potentials. Ann Bot (Lond) 94: 675–689[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McLaughlin JE, Boyer JS (2007) Functional reversion to identify controlling genes in multigenic responses: analysis of floral abortion. J Exp Bot 58: 267–277[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mickelson S, See D, Meyer FD, Garner JP, Foster CR, Blake TK, Fischer AM (2003) Mapping of QTL associated with nitrogen storage and remobilization in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. J Exp Bot 54: 801–812[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller AK, Galiba G, Dubcovsky J (2006) A cluster of 11 CBF transcription factors is located at the frost tolerance locus Fr-A^m2 in Triticum monococcum. Mol Genet Genomics 275: 193–203[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2007) Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced? J Agric Sci 145: 139–149[CrossRef]

Miwa K, Takano J, Omori H, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Fujiwara T (2007) Plants tolerant of high boron levels. Science 318: 1417

Munns R, Rebetzke GJ, Husain S, James RA, Hare RA (2003) Genetic control of sodium exclusion in durum wheat. Aust J Agric Res 54: 627–635[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Narasimhamoorthy B, Bouton JH, Olsen KM, Sledge MK (2007) Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of aluminum tolerance in diploid alfalfa. Theor Appl Genet 114: 901–913[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Neeraja CN, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Pamplona A, Heuer S, Collard BCY, Septiningsih EM, Vergara G, Sanchez D, Xu K, Ismail AM, et al (2007) A marker-assisted backcross approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 115: 767–776[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nelson D, Repetti P, Adams T, Creelman R, Wu J, Warner D, Anstrom D, Bensen R, Castiglioni P, Donnarummo M, et al (2007) Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16450–16455[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nguyen BD, Brar DS, Bui BC, Nguyen TV, Pham LN, Nguyen HT (2003) Identification and mapping of the QTL for aluminum tolerance introgressed from the new source, Oryza rufipogon Griff., into indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 106: 583–593[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ninamango-Cárdenas FE, Guimarães CT, Martins PR, Parentoni SN, Carneiro NP, Lopes MA, Moro JR, Paiva E (2003) Mapping QTLs for aluminum tolerance in maize. Euphytica 130: 223–232[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Novillo F, Medina J, Salinas J (2007) Arabidopsis CBF1 and CBF3 have a different function than CBF2 in cold acclimation and define different gene classes in the CBF regulon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 21002–21007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ochoa IE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2006) QTL analysis of adventitious root formation in common bean under contrasting phosphorus availability. Crop Sci 46: 1609–1621[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parry MAJ, Flexas J, Medrano H (2005) Prospects for crop production under drought: research priorities and future directions. Ann Appl Biol 147: 211–226[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Passioura J (2007) The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot 58: 113–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pelleschi S, Leonardi A, Rocher JP, Cornic G, de Vienne D, Thevenot C, Prioul JL (2006) Analysis of the relationships between growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism using quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in young maize plants subjected to water deprivation. Mol Breed 17: 21–39[CrossRef]

Pennisi E (2008) The blue revolution, drop by drop, gene by gene. Science 320: 171–173[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perruc E, Kinoshita N, Lopez-Molina L (2007) The role of chromatin-remodeling factor PKL in balancing osmotic stress responses during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J 52: 927–936[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Platten JD, Cotsaftis O, Berthomieu P, Bohnert H, Davenport RJ, Fairbairn DJ, Horie T, Leigh RA, Lin H-X, Luan S, et al (2006) Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 11: 372–374[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Podlich DW, Winkler CR, Cooper M (2004) Mapping as you go: an effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits. Crop Sci 44: 1560–1571[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poroyko V, Spollen WG, Hejlek LG, Hernandez AG, LeNoble ME, Davis G, Nguyen HT, Springer GK, Sharp RE, Bohnert HJ (2007) Comparing regional transcript profiles from maize primary roots under well-watered and low water potential conditions. J Exp Bot 58: 279–289[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Potokina E, Druka A, Luo ZW, Wise R, Waugh R, Kearsey M (2008) Gene expression quantitative trait locus analysis of 16,000 barley genes reveals a complex pattern of genome-wide transcriptional regulation. Plant J 53: 90–101[Web of Science][Medline]

Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Schmidt W, Möller EM, Röber FK, Knaak C, Ernst K, Westhoff P, Geiger HH (2007) Quantitative trait loci for early plant vigour of maize grown in chilly environments. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1059–1070[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Price AH, Cairns JE, Horton P, Jones HG, Griffiths H (2002) Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J Exp Bot 53: 989–1004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Prioul JL, Pelleschi S, Sene M, Thevenot C, Causse M, de Vienne D, Leonardi A (1999) From QTLs for enzyme activity to candidate genes in maize. J Exp Bot 50: 1281–1288[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Prioul JL, Quarrie S, Causse M, deVienne D (1997) Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of molecular quantitative genetics. J Exp Bot 48: 1151–1163[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ragot M, Lee M (2007) Marker-assisted selection in maize: current status, potential, limitations and perspectives from the private and public sectors. In E Guimarães, J Ruane, B Scherf, A Sonnino, J Dargie, eds, Marker-Assisted Selection: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Crops, Livestock, Forestry and Fish. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp 117–150

Raman H, Zhang KR, Cakir M, Appels R, Garvin DF, Maron LG, Kochian LV, Moroni JS, Raman R, Imtiaz M, et al (2005) Molecular characterization and mapping of ALMT1, the aluminium-tolerance gene of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 48: 781–791[Medline]

Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (2002) Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci 42: 739–745[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reinheimer JL, Barr AR, Eglinton JK (2004) QTL mapping of chromosomal regions conferring reproductive frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 109: 1267–1274[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX (2005) A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet 37: 1141–1146[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rengasamy P (2006) World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Exp Bot 57: 1017–1023[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F (2003) Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyse the genetic variability of the responses of leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol 131: 664–675[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reymond M, Svistoonoff S, Loudet O, Nussaume L, Desnos T (2006) Identification of QTL controlling root growth response to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 29: 115–125[CrossRef][Medline]

Reynolds M, Tuberosa R (2008) Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11: 171–179[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ribaut JM, Fracheboud Y, Monneveux P, Banziger M, Vargas M, Jiang CJ (2007) Quantitative trait loci for yield and correlated traits under high and low soil nitrogen conditions in tropical maize. Mol Breed 20: 15–29[CrossRef]

Ribaut JM, Hoisington D, Banziger M, Setter T, Edmeades G (2004) Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in maize: a case study. In JM Ribaut, ed, Physiology and Biotechnology Integration for Plant Breeding. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 571–609

Ribaut JM, Ragot M (2007) Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J Exp Bot 58: 351–360[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Richards RA, Passioura JB (1989) A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments is associated with fast early vigor in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 40: 943–950[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rivero RM, Kojima M, Gepstein A, Sakakibara H, Mittler R, Gepstein S, Blumwald E (2007) Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19631–19636[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Robertson DS (1985) A possible technique for isolating genic DNA for quantitative traits in plants. J Theor Biol 117: 1–10[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rodríguez-Navarro A, Rubio F (2006) High-affinity potassium and sodium transport systems in plants. J Exp Bot 57: 1149–1160[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rus A, Baxter I, Muthukumar B, Gustin J, Lahner B, Yakubova E, Salt DE (2006) Natural variants of AtHKT1 enhance Na+ accumulation in two wild populations of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 2: 1964–1973[Web of Science]

Sadok W, Naudin P, Boussuge B, Muller B, Welcker C, Tardieu F (2007) Leaf growth rate per unit thermal time follows QTL-dependent daily patterns in hundreds of maize lines under naturally fluctuating conditions. Plant Cell Environ 30: 135–146[CrossRef][Medline]

Saini HS (1997) Effects of water stress on male gametophyte development in plants. Sex Plant Reprod 10: 67–73[CrossRef]

Saini HS, Westgate ME (2000) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. In DL Sparks, ed, Advances in Agronomy, Vol 68. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 59–96

Salse J, Feuillet C (2007) Comparative genomics of cereals. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 177–206

Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Tomes D, Niu X, Fengler KA, Meeley R, Ananiev EV, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, et al (2007) Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 11376–11381[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salvi S, Tuberosa R (2005) To clone or not to clone plant QTLs: present and future challenges. Trends Plant Sci 10: 297–304[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sasaki T, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Hebb DM, Ogihara Y, Kawaura K, Noda K, Kojima T, Toyoda A, Matsumoto H, et al (2006) Sequence upstream of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ALMT1 gene and its relationship to aluminum resistance. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 1343–1354[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Matsumoto H (2004) A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J 37: 645–653[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schnurbusch T, Collins NC, Eastwood RF, Sutton T, Jefferies SP, Langridge P (2007) Fine mapping and targeted SNP survey using rice-wheat gene colinearity in the region of the Bo1 boron toxicity tolerance locus of bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 115: 451–461[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Septiningsih EM, Pamplona AM, Sanchez DL, Iftekharuddaula K, Masuduzzaman ASM, Vergara G, Singh S, Dang TTM, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Neeraja CN, et al (2008) The Sub1 gene and its implications in developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars. In Abstracts of the 5th International Crop Science Congress and Exhibition, April 13–18, Jeju, Korea. 5th ICSC Organizing Committee, Seoul, Korea, p 177

Sergeeva LI, Keurentjes JJ, Bentsink L, Vonk J, van der Plas LH, Koornneef M, Vreugdenhil D (2006) Vacuolar invertase regulates elongation of Arabidopsis thaliana roots as revealed by QTL and mutant analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 2994–2999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Servin B, Hospital F (2002) Optimal positioning of markers to control genetic background in marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 93: 214–217[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Servin B, Martin OC, Mezard M, Hospital F (2004) Toward a theory of marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics 168: 513–523[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shimizu A, Yanagihara S, Kawasaki S, Ikehashi H (2004) Phosphorus deficiency-induced root elongation and its QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 109: 1361–1368[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2000) Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 217–223[Web of Science][Medline]

Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 58: 221–227[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spielmeyer W, Hyles J, Joaquim P, Azanza F, Bonnett D, Ellis ME, Moore C, Richards RA (2007) A QTL on chromosome 6A in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) is associated with longer coleoptiles, greater seedling vigour and final plant height. Theor Appl Genet 115: 59–66[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steele KA, Price AH, Shashidhar HE, Witcombe JR (2006) Marker-assisted selection to introgress rice QTLs controlling root traits into an Indian upland rice variety. Theor Appl Genet 112: 208–221[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steele KA, Virk DS, Kumar R, Prasad SC, Witcombe JR (2007) Field evaluation of upland rice lines selected for QTLs controlling root traits. Field Crops Res 101: 180–186[CrossRef]

Su JY, Xiao YM, Li M, Liu QY, Li B, Tong YP, Jia JZ, Li ZS (2006) Mapping QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance at wheat seedling stage. Plant Soil 281: 25–36[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Sunarpi, Horie T, Motoda J, Kubo M, Yang H, Yoda K, Horie R, Chan W-Y, Leung H-Y, Hattori K, et al (2005) Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J 44: 928–938[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sunkar R, Chinnusamy V, Zhu JH, Zhu JK (2007) Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends Plant Sci 12: 301–309[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sutton T, Baumann U, Hayes J, Collins NC, Shi BJ, Schnurbusch T, Hay A, Mayo G, Pallotta M, Tester M, et al (2007) Boron-toxicity tolerance in barley arising from efflux transporter amplification. Science 318: 1446–1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takahashi Y, Shomura A, Sasaki T, Yano M (2001) Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the a subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 7922–7927[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takano J, Wada M, Ludewig U, Schaaf G, von Wirén N, Fujiwara T (2006) The Arabidopsis major intrinsic protein NIP5;1 is essential for efficient boron uptake and plant development under boron limitation. Plant Cell 18: 1498–1509[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063–1066[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92: 191–203[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Tardieu F (2003) Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 8: 9–14[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49: 419–432[Abstract]

Tardieu F, Zhang J, Katerji N, Bethenod O, Palmer S, Davies WJ (1992) Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field-grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying. Plant Cell Environ 15: 193–197[Medline]

Teulat B, Merah O, Sirault X, Borries C, Waugh R, This D (2002) QTLs for grain carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown barley. Theor Appl Genet 106: 118–126[Web of Science][Medline]

Till BJ, Comai L, Henikoff S (2007) TILLING and ecoTILLING for crop improvement. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 333–350

Toojinda T, Tragoonrung S, Vanavichit A, Siangliw JL, Pa-In N, Jantaboon J, Siangliw M, Fukai S (2005) Molecular breeding for rainfed lowland rice in the Mekong region. Plant Prod Sci 8: 330–333[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Torres TT, Metta M, Ottenwalder B, Schlotterer C (2008) Gene expression profiling by massively parallel sequencing. Genome Res 18: 172–177[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tuberosa R, Giuliani S, Parry MAJ, Araus JL (2007) Improving water use efficiency in Mediterranean agriculture: what limits the adoption of new technologies? Ann Appl Biol 150: 157–162[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Tuberosa R, Salvi S (2006) Genomics approaches to improve drought tolerance in crops. Trends Plant Sci 11: 405–412

Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Landi P, Maccaferri M, Conti S (2002) Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann Bot (Lond) 89: 941–963[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Maccaferri M, Giuliani S, Landi P (2003) Searching for quantitative trait loci controlling root traits in maize: a critical appraisal. Plant Soil 255: 35–54[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Tuberosa R, Sanguineti MC, Landi P, Salvi S, Casarini E, Conti S (1998) RFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling abscisic acid concentration in leaves of drought-stressed maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 97: 744–755[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Vargas M, van Eeuwijk FA, Crossa J, Ribaut JM (2006) Mapping QTLs and QTL x environment interaction for CIMMYT maize drought stress program using factorial regression and partial least squares methods. Theor Appl Genet 112: 1009–1023[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Varshney RK, Tuberosa R (2007) Genomics-assisted crop improvement: an overview. In RK Varshney, R Tuberosa, eds, Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, Vol 1: Genomics Approaches and Platforms. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1–12

Vij S, Tyagi AK (2007) Emerging trends in the functional genomics of the abiotic stress response in crop plants. Plant Biotechnol J 5: 361–380[CrossRef][Medline]

Vladutu C, McLaughlin J, Phillips RL (1999) Fine mapping and characterization of linked quantitative trait loci involved in the transition of the maize apical meristem from vegetative to generative structures. Genetics 153: 993–1007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang JK, Wan XY, Crossa J, Crouch J, Weng JF, Zhai HQ, Wan JM (2006) QTL mapping of grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using chromosome segment substitution lines. Genet Res 88: 93–104[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wang JP, Raman H, Zhou MX, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Hebb DM, Coombes N, Mendham N (2007) High-resolution mapping of the Alp locus and identification of a candidate gene HvMATE controlling aluminium tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 115: 265–276[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Welcker C, Boussuge B, Benciveni C, Ribaut JM, Tardieu F (2007) Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and anthesis-silking interval to water deficit. J Exp Bot 58: 339–349[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wight CP, Kibite S, Tinker NA, Molnar SJ (2006) Identification of molecular markers for aluminium tolerance in diploid oat through comparative mapping and QTL analysis. Theor Appl Genet 112: 222–231[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wissuwa M, Gamat G, Ismail AM (2005) Is root growth under phosphorus deficiency affected by source or sink limitations? J Exp Bot 56: 1943–1950[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wissuwa M, Ismail AM, Yanagihara S (2006) Effects of zinc deficiency on rice growth and genetic factors contributing to tolerance. Plant Physiol 142: 731–741[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wissuwa M, Wegner J, Ae N, Yano M (2002) Substitution mapping of Pup1: a major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus-deficient soil. Theor Appl Genet 105: 890–897[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Xin Z, Browse J (2000) Cold comfort farm: the acclimation of plants to freezing temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 23: 893–902[CrossRef]

Xiong Y, Fei S-z, Arora R, Brummer EC, Barker RE, Jung G, Warnke SE (2007) Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling winter hardiness in an annual x perennial ryegrass interspecific hybrid population. Mol Breed 19: 125–136[CrossRef]

Xu FS, Wang YH, Meng J (2001) Mapping boron efficiency gene(s) in Brassica napus using RFLP and AFLP markers. Plant Breed 120: 319–324[CrossRef]

Xu K, Xu X, Fukao T, Canlas P, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Heuer S, Ismail AM, Bailey-Serres J, Ronald PC, Mackill DJ (2006) Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442: 705–708[CrossRef][Medline]

Xu Y, Crouch JH (2008) Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci 48: 391–407[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xue Y, Jiang L, Su N, Wang JK, Deng P, Ma JF, Zhai HQ, Wan JM (2007) The genetic basis and fine-mapping of a stable quantitative-trait loci for aluminium tolerance in rice. Planta 227: 255–262[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yan XL, Liao H, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant Soil 265: 17–29[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Yang J, Sears RG, Gill BS, Paulsen GM (2002) Quantitative and molecular characterization of heat tolerance in hexaploid wheat. Euphytica 126: 275–282[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Yang XH, Wen XG, Gong HM, Lu QT, Yang ZP, Tang YL, Liang Z, Lu CM (2007) Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine enhances thermotolerance of photosystem II in tobacco plants. Planta 225: 719–733[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, et al (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12: 2473–2484[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yin X, Struik PC, Kropff MJ (2004) Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends Plant Sci 9: 426–432[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yin XY, Struik PC, van Eeuwijk FA, Stam P, Tang JJ (2005) QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. J Exp Bot 56: 967–976[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu JM, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178: 539–551[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yue B, Xue WY, Xiong LZ, Yu XQ, Luo LJ, Cui KH, Jin DM, Xing YZ, Zhang QF (2006) Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics 172: 1213–1228[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zeng C, Han Y, Shi L, Peng L, Wang Y, Xu F, Meng J (2008) Genetic analysis of the physiological responses to low boron stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 31: 112–122[Medline]

Zhu JM, Alvarez S, Marsh EL, LeNoble ME, Cho IJ, Sivaguru M, Chen SX, Nguyen HT, Wu YJ, Schachtman DP, et al (2007) Cell wall proteome in the maize primary root elongation zone. II. Region-specific changes in water soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins under water deficit. Plant Physiol 145: 1533–1548[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu JM, Kaeppler SM, Lynch JP (2005) Mapping of QTL controlling root hair length in maize (Zea mays L.) under phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil 270: 299–310[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Zhu JM, Mickelson SM, Kaeppler SM, Lynch JP (2006) Detection of quantitative trait loci for seminal root traits in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under differential phosphorus levels. Theor Appl Genet 113: 1–10[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zinselmeier C, Jeong BR, Boyer JS (1999) Starch and the control of kernel number in maize at low water potentials. Plant Physiol 121: 25–35[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zinselmeier C, Sun YJ, Helentjaris T, Beatty M, Yang S, Smith H, Habben J (2002) The use of gene expression profiling to dissect the stress sensitivity of reproductive development in maize. Field Crops Res 75: 111–121[CrossRef]

Zwart RS, Thompson JP, Sheedy JG, Nelson JC (2006) Mapping quantitative trait loci for resistance to Pratylenchus thornei from synthetic hexaploid wheat in the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population. Aust J Agric Res 57: 525–530[CrossRef][Web of Science]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Semenov and N. G. Halford Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(10): 2791 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Z. Habash, Z. Kehel, and M. Nachit Genomic approaches for designing durum wheat ready for climate change with a focus on drought J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(10): 2805 - 2815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Reynolds, M. J. Foulkes, G. A. Slafer, P. Berry, M. A. J. Parry, J. W. Snape, and W. J. Angus Raising yield potential in wheat J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(7): 1899 - 1918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R. Agricola Articles by Collins, N. C. Articles by Tuberosa, R.