|
|
||||||||
|
First published online May 14, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.117564 Plant Physiology 147:1092-1109 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
The Potato-Specific Apyrase Is Apoplastically Localized and Has Influence on Gene Expression, Growth, and Development1,[W],[OA]Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Apyrases hydrolyze nucleoside triphosphates and diphosphates and are found in all eukaryotes and a few prokaryotes. Although their enzymatic properties have been well characterized, relatively little is known regarding their subcellular localization and physiological function in plants. In this study, we used reverse genetic and biochemical approaches to investigate the role of potato (Solanum tuberosum)-specific apyrase. Silencing of the apyrase gene family with RNA interference constructs under the control of the constitutive 35S promoter led to a strong decrease in apyrase activity to below 10% of the wild-type level. This decreased activity led to phenotypic changes in the transgenic lines, including a general retardation in growth, an increase in tuber number per plant, and differences in tuber morphology. Silencing of apyrase under the control of a tuber-specific promoter led to similar changes in tuber morphology; however, there were no direct effects of apyrase inhibition on tuber metabolism. DNA microarrays revealed that decreased expression of apyrase leads to increased levels of transcripts coding for cell wall proteins involved in growth and genes involved in energy transfer and starch synthesis. To place these results in context, we determined the subcellular localization of the potato-specific apyrase. Using a combination of approaches, we were able to demonstrate that this enzyme is localized to the apoplast. We describe the evidence that underlies both this fact and that potato-specific apyrase has a crucial role in regulating growth and development.
ATP-diphosphohydrolases, or apyrases, are enzymes that hydrolyze both the - and β-phosphates of ATP and ADP. They are distinct from other phosphohydrolases with respect to their specific activity, nucleotide substrate specificity, divalent cation requirement, and sensitivity to inhibitors (Plesner, 1995
In contrast to the situation described above for mammalian systems, relatively little is known about the function of apyrase in plants. The enzyme has been characterized at the biochemical level in potato (Solanum tuberosum; Kalckar, 1944
Although AtAPY1 and AtAPY2 are thought to be ecto-apyrases, only indirect evidence supporting an apoplastic localization for these enzymes has been presented to date (Wu et al., 2007
In this study, we cloned two new potato-specific apyrases closely related to the one identified by Handa and Guidotti (1996)
Potato Contains at Least Three Different Potato-Specific Apyrases with High Expression in Sink Tissues
Using primers based on the 5' and 3' untranslated region sequences of the previously cloned potato apyrase (Handa and Guidotti, 1996
The cDNA of StAPY2 has a comparable length to StAPY1 and StAPY3. However, in addition to the TAA stop codon found in the other apyrases at positions 1,363 to 1,365, it has an additional stop codon at positions 850 to 852. The protein sequences of both isoforms contain all four apyrase conserved regions identified by Handa and Guidotti (1996
Isolation of a genomic clone of StAPY2 confirmed that the truncation found in the cDNA was not an artifact of the cloning procedure. The 4-kb sequence obtained contained the 3,909-bp DNA sequence from the start to the posterior stop codon identified in the cDNA (Fig. 1B). In total agreement with the anterior stop codon found in the cDNA of StAPY2, the genomic sequence contained the corresponding stop codon in exon 7 at positions 2,855 to 2,857. The gene consists of nine exons and eight introns, exactly like the Arabidopsis apyrases AtAPY1 and AtAPY2, and some of the splicing sites are conserved between the potato and Arabidopsis apyrases. It thus seems likely that the general plant apyrases and the potato-specific apyrases originated from a common ancestral protein.
Potato plants with reduced/elevated apyrase expression were generated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Desiree potato plants, as described by Rocha-Sosa et al. (1989)
To investigate the expression of apyrase in the transgenic lines, both apyrase mRNA and activity were determined. The primers used for the real-time PCR were specific for isoforms StApy1 and StApy3 but would not allow amplification of StApy2. Differentiation between StApy1 and StApy3 was virtually impossible, due to the high similarity at the nucleotide level downstream of the sequence used for RNAi induction. Apyrase activity was measured in the soluble fraction of enzyme extracts using ATP as substrate and in the absence of phosphatase inhibitors, since potato apyrase is the predominant ATP-hydrolyzing phosphatase in enzyme extracts of potato tubers (see below). As shown in Figure 2, A and B , both the apyrase mRNA and activity of all 35S-RNAi lines were significantly reduced, whereas the apyrase mRNA and activity of two of the 35S-overexpressing lines were significantly higher than those in wild-type tubers. While line 35S:17 was clearly most strongly reduced in StAPY1/3 transcript levels (0.13% of the wild type) compared with lines 35S:35 (5.3%) and 35S:23 (18%), apyrase activity was similarly reduced in all three RNAi lines. Line 35S:23 appeared to be the most affected, followed by lines 35S:17 and 35S:35 at the level of activity. However, these lines were not very different from one another, with activities ranging from 6.0% to 7.1% of the total wild-type activity. From this, we conclude that neither transcript levels nor phosphatase activities allow unimpeachable conclusions regarding the degree of reduction of apyrase in these lines. That said, they clearly demonstrate that apyrase is markedly reduced in all of them.
Using specific primers for StAPY2, we found that this isoform is expressed to a lower extent when compared with StAPY1 and StAPY3 and that its expression is also reduced in two of the 35S-RNAi lines (Supplemental Fig. S3, A–C). As observed for the wild type, apyrase activities of the transgenics were similar when UTP, ADP, and UDP were provided as substrate (see Fig. 7H below). However, it should be noted that the turnover of the monophosphates was markedly lower, suggesting that ATP was hydrolyzed by apyrase, not by any phosphatase. The relative turnover of the triphosphates and diphosphates tested was invariant in the overexpressing lines.
All of the lines exhibited a resting ATP-hydrolyzing activity of approximately 6% of that found in the wild type. It seems unlikely that all of this activity corresponds to residual potato-specific apyrase, since apyrase protein was not detectable on a western blot in the strongest RNAi line and consistently increased in the strongest overexpressing line (Supplemental Fig. S3D). This result suggests that the remaining ATP hydrolysis activity is catalyzed either by apyrase isoforms that do not cross-react with the antibody or by less specific phosphatases. Irrespective of what is responsible for this residual activity, the data presented here clearly demonstrate that potato-specific apyrase isoforms contribute to the vast majority of apyrase activity measured in potato tubers.
When grown in a greenhouse, potato plants with decreased constitutive expression of apyrase showed developmental alterations compared with the wild type. There was a decrease in shoot growth; however, this was not strictly dependent on the decrease in apyrase activity (Supplemental Fig. S4, A and B). Lines with decreased apyrase, however, produced a larger number of tubers (Fig. 2C), which were considerably smaller in size (Fig. 2D) and developed a more longitudinal shape than tubers of the wild type (Fig. 2D). In contrast to this, lines with increased expression of apyrase under control of the 35S promoter had no visible alterations in overall plant growth or tuber development in comparison with the wild type (data not shown).
In order to investigate whether tuber development was specifically affected by a decrease in apyrase activity in the growing tuber, as opposed to pleiotropic changes as a consequence of its reduced expression in other plant tissues, further transgenic lines were generated that expressed the apyrase-RNAi chimera under the control of the tuber-specific B33 patatin promoter. Following screening of the resultant transformants, four lines were selected that displayed a strong decrease in both tuber apyrase mRNA and activity with respect to the wild type (Fig. 3, A and B
). As would perhaps be expected, there was no substantial decrease in shoot growth when apyrase expression was decreased using the B33 promoter (data not shown), since this promoter has been demonstrated to confer tuber-specific expression (Liu et al., 1990
The total tuber number per plant was only slightly increased in the B33 lines in comparison with the wild type, and this was only significant in a single line (Fig. 3C). These results contrast with those of the 35S lines, which exhibited a very clear increase in tuber number (Fig. 2C). This discrepancy, however, could be due to several reasons, including differential promoter strength and the fact that the results of the 35S expression could be complicated by modulating apyrase expression in a broad range of tissue types.
We further investigated whether decreased expression of apyrase via the tuber-specific B33 promoter affects the composition of the tubers. Starch, which represents the major carbohydrate in potato tubers, was only slightly elevated in response to the repression of apyrase, the increase being significant only in two of the lines showing a strong decrease in apyrase activity (Fig. 3D). The reduction of apyrase activity did not substantially affect the relative contents of total protein (data not shown) or of cell wall components such as cellulose or uronic acids (Supplemental Fig. S5, A and B). Moreover, the composition of cell wall matrix polysaccharides was unaltered in the transgenic lines, providing evidence that cell wall matrix architecture was not affected by the change in apyrase activity (Supplemental Fig. S5C). Given that uronic acids and cell wall matrix polysaccharides are produced in the Golgi, the lack of changes in these components argues against the possibility that potato-specific apyrases act as latent UDPases functionally linked to the production of such cell wall structures in the Golgi. As such, these results oppose the hypothesis postulated for the apyrase of P. sativum (Orellana et al., 1997 In order to investigate whether the changes in tuber development and starch content in the transformants were attributable to changes in metabolite levels, we next assessed these using HPLC and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). There were no significant changes in the levels of adenylate pools or adenylate-related parameters for cellular energy charge in the different genotypes, with the exception of the concentration of AMP in line B33:3 (Supplemental Fig. S6). The other uridylates and guanylates (UTP/UDP/UMP/GTP/GDP/GMP) measured by HPLC were also unaltered in comparison with the wild type (data not shown).
Although steady-state levels of nucleotides were unchanged, we postulated that reduction of apyrase may have led to a decline in the turnover of nucleotides. Such a scenario would be anticipated to result in lowered respiration rates, since it would entail lower demand for respiratory ATP production. For this reason, oxygen consumption of tubers was determined by transferring freshly cut tuber slices into a Clarke-type electrode. However, this parameter was also largely unaltered in the transformants (Supplemental Fig. S7), suggesting that modification of apyrase did not greatly affect overall cellular ATP turnover. Systematic profiling of metabolites using a GC-MS-based method also failed to reveal major changes in metabolite levels in the transformants (Supplemental Table S2). Furthermore, even minor changes were not statistically significant following correction of the P values returned using the false discovery rate (FDR) method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995
To investigate whether the changes in tuber development and starch content in response to the decreased apyrase activity are attributable to broader changes in gene expression, transcript profiles were analyzed in growing tubers using The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) 10k EST potato array. This array contains 12,091 cDNAs in replicates and covers approximately 25% of the 46,000 potato genes found so far according to the Canadian Potato Genome Project. Four arrays were analyzed that were hybridized with two independent tuber samples from line B33:10 versus wild-type samples and two independent tuber samples from line B33:25 versus wild-type samples. The P values obtained after normalization were corrected for multiple testing using the FDR algorithm implemented in the R software (the FDR corrected P values are subsequently referred to as q values). In some cases, several clones of one gene were spotted on the array. After elimination of the redundant clones, 11,375 individual genes derived from unique tentative consensus sequences remained. Of these, 540 genes (4.7% of all genes) were differentially regulated. Only 58 of them were down-regulated compared with 481 genes that were up-regulated, showing that reduced apyrase activity leads to a preferential activation of genes. Of the up-regulated genes, 48 showed a greater than 2-fold induction; however, no repression of corresponding magnitude was observed in the down-regulated genes. Using a recently developed MapMan mapping file (Rotter et al., 2007
Almost half of the genes displaying a 2-fold increase in transcript levels code for apoplastic proteins belonging to the class of extensins or related proteins (Table I; Fig. 4A). Extensins are Hyp-rich proteins that are highly O-glycosylated at the Hyp residues. They are structural components of the cell wall with signaling function and have been implicated in many developmental processes and various biotic and abiotic stress responses (Baumberger et al., 2001
Decreased apyrase led to increased levels of transcripts involved in the provision of carbon and energy for starch synthesis in the amyloplast (Fig. 4B). Both Suc synthase genes 2 (STMDV33, log2 = 0.55, q = 0.0279) and 4 (STMHF04, log2 = 0.85, q = 0.0018) were induced in response to the decreased expression of apyrase. Also, the genes coding for the mitochondrial ATP/ADP translocator 2 (ANT2; Table I) and ANT1 were significantly up-regulated (STMDW96, log2 = 0.76, q = 0.0010) as well as the plastidic ATP/ADP translocator 1 (AANT1; STMGG40, log2 = 0.60, q = 0.0399), as were the Glc-6-P translocator 1 (STMJF75, log2 = 0.66, q = 0.0066) and 2 (STMEC08, log2 = 0.59, q = 0.0429). These changes are in agreement with previous studies showing that the activities of Suc synthase, the plastidic ATP/ADP translocator, and the plastidic Glc-6-P transporter positively correlate with starch content in potato tubers (Tjaden et al., 1998 Although no influence of altered apyrase activity was found on the composition or amount of cell wall matrix sugars or uronic acids (Supplemental Fig. S5, B and C), two genes coding for glycosyltransferases were strongly up-regulated in response to the decrease in apyrase expression (Table I; Fig. 4C).
The lack of significant changes in nucleotide pool levels upon reduction of apyrase indicates that the potato apyrase resides in a compartment that is physically separated from the major nucleotide pools of the cell: those found in the cytosol, mitochondria, and plastid. Unfortunately, the subcellular localization of apyrases in plants is still a matter of debate. The apyrases GS52 from G. max and DbLNP from the legume D. biflorus were found to be localized to the cell membrane (Day et al., 2000
Determination of Apyrase in Fractionated Tuber Tissue
The pattern of apyrase activity was substantially different from the pattern of the cytosolic, plastidial, and mitochondrial marker activities (Fig. 5
). Thus, it is unlikely that apyrase is localized in the cytosol, plastids, or mitochondria. The high recovery rate of apyrase activity (100% ± 20% for all gradients; data not shown) also excludes that ATP hydrolysis was carried out by another phosphatase than apyrase. The vacuolar/apoplastic marker mannosidase shows a similar pattern to apyrase and correlated highly significantly with apyrase in its distribution in the representative gradient 11a (Fig. 5A) and all five gradients tested additionally (r = 0.977, P < 0.0001, n = 30; Fig. 5B). At the moment, it is not possible to distinguish between vacuole and apoplast in the nonaqueous gradients due to cofractionation of apoplastic and vacuolar markers (Fettke et al., 2005
Transient Expression of Apyrase-GFP in Leaf Epidermis Cells The data obtained from the nonaqueous fractionation gradients suggest vacuolar or apoplastic localization for apyrase. To distinguish between these possibilities, localization was further investigated by the use of an apyrase-GFP fusion protein. Potato apyrase StAPY3 was cloned into pA7-GFP (Sohlenkamp et al., 2002
Determination of Apyrase Activity in Apoplastic Washing Fluid from Leaves of Potato Wild-Type Plants If apyrase is a soluble apoplastic protein or easily detachable from an apoplastic component, it should be possible to detect its activity in apoplastic washing fluid (AWF). This method has already been used not only for the determination of apoplastic metabolites but also for the extraction of apoplastic proteins (Boudart et al., 2005
Although it is possible that the enzyme might have been modified in one of the fractions or that the presence of effectors led to the differences in kinetic properties, these results suggest the existence of apyrases with different kinetic properties localized in different subcellular compartments in potato leaves. The leaf apoplastic apyrase possesses comparable relative turnover rates for the different purine and pyrimidine nucleotides tested. These kinetic properties also apply to the apyrases changed in activity in this study; therefore, it is highly likely that they are identical. A second leaf apyrase shows preference to the pyrimidine nucleotide UDP. From the experiment performed, no clear conclusions can be drawn concerning its localization with the exception of the fact that we can rule out that it is not a soluble apoplastic protein. Indeed, its substrate preference suggests that it is more likely to be the Golgi-localized latent UDPase, the apyrase potentially involved in the nucleotide sugar transfer (Orellana et al., 1997
Determination of Apyrase Activity in Intact Tuber Slices of Potato Wild-Type Plants and Lines with Altered Apyrase Activity The apyrase activities of intact tuber slices from the strongest B33-RNAi and the second strongest 35S-RNAi line (B33:25 and 35S:23) were significantly reduced to a level of 45% and 44% of the wild-type activity, respectively (Fig. 7F). By contrast, the apyrase activity was strongly elevated in the strongest 35S overexpressor (Fig. 7E). The rate of hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphates and diphosphates is apparently much higher than the rate of hydrolysis of the monophosphate in wild-type tuber slices (Fig. 7G). This finding, when taken together with the fact that apyrase activity in the discs of the different lines was altered according to the respective apyrase expression level, provides clear evidence that hydrolysis was carried out by an apyrase rather than an unspecific phosphatase. Furthermore, the maximal activities for the substrates ATP, UTP, ADP, and UDP were identical, as was the case for apyrase characterized in tuber extracts from the wild type (Fig. 7H) and also in tuber extracts from the strongest StAPY3 overexpressor, 35S:113 (data not shown), and they were similar to those determined in the AWF from wild-type potato leaves (Fig. 7C).
Potato-Specific Apyrases May Constitute a Small Gene Family The cloning of three very similar potato-specific apyrases, one of them truncated, may suggest that these apyrases constitute a small gene family. Whether these different isoforms are encoded on different loci or are merely different alleles of the same gene cannot currently be stated confidently, due to the high degree of heterozygosity and the tetraploid genome of potato. The fact that StAPY2 and StAPY3 were cloned using primers that bind to the untranslated region, which generally exhibits low conservation between different genes, would favor the one gene/different allele scenario. However, the existence of all three isoforms in the cultivar Bintje and a Southern-blot analysis showing several bands when probed with StAPY3 (data not shown) provide strong support for the assumption of a small gene family. Additionally, two more apyrases were identified from TC sequences (Supplemental Table S1) that resemble more closely general plant apyrases like AtAPY1 and AtAPY2, but their total number is probably higher because Arabidopsis already contains seven predicted apyrases (The Arabidopsis Information Resource). Potato-specific apyrases are expressed predominantly in sink tissues, like root, flower, stolon, and tuber, but to a much lower extent, if at all, in leaf or stem tissue (Fig. 1A). When expression of the potato-specific apyrase was altered in transgenic plants, strong morphological alterations were found in sink tissues such as tubers. The RNAi approach led to the reduction of nearly all of the apyrase activity in growing tubers, indicating that these potato-specific apyrases encode for most of the apyrase activity in this tissue (Figs. 2B and 3B).
To date, most plant apyrases have been demonstrated or postulated to be localized at the plasma membrane or in the Golgi (Orellana et al., 1997 In order to determine whether potato-specific apyrase directly participates in Golgi sugar transfer, an analysis of the cell wall with particular focus on the structural components that assemble in the Golgi was conducted (Supplemental Fig. S5). This analysis revealed that neither the absolute amounts of uronic acids nor the composition of cell wall matrix sugars varied in the transgenic lines. Given that these compounds are likely the largest source of sugars transferred via the Golgi sugar transfer system, it follows that apyrase is not a component of this pathway.
Our results revealed strong effects of apyrase on specific aspects of tuber development. Tubers displaying either constitutive or tuber-specific decreases in the expression of apyrase developed a rod-like shape, indicating stimulation of longitudinal growth of the tubers, in comparison with the wild type (Figs. 2D and 3E). The 35S lines also exhibited a significant decrease in tuber size and an increase in tuber number in response to a reduction of apyrase. Furthermore, the 35S-RNAi lines additionally displayed a decrease in overall plant growth. This was not strictly dependent on the reduction of apyrase (Supplemental Fig. S4). It does, however, at least partially confirm recent studies in Arabidopsis suggesting that plant growth is strongly dependent on apyrase expression (Wolf et al., 2007
Although changes in apyrase expression did not affect tuber metabolite profiles (Supplemental Table S2), they led to characteristic changes in the expression pattern of nuclear genes (Fig. 4; Table I). By far the most striking change was the large induction of transcripts coding for cell wall proteins belonging to the class of extensins and related proteins, which made up 13 of the 27 genes displaying a considerable up-regulation at the transcript level. We can rule out that this strong up-regulation is caused by one or a few dominant extensin cDNAs hybridizing to the spots coding for the other extensin genes, since all of the differentially regulated extensins are fairly divergent in nucleotide sequence (data not shown).
Extensins represent a multigene family coding for cell wall proteins with structural and signaling functions in the apoplast. Strong correlative evidence exists that extensins are involved in wounding, biotic and abiotic stress responses, and developmental processes such as pollen recognition and fertilization, embryo development, cell division, differentiation, abscission, and senescence (Rumeau et al., 1990
The majority of transcripts encoding genes associated with central metabolism were not affected by the reduction of apyrase. This observation was in strong accordance with the lack of changes in metabolite levels of intermediates of these pathways. Interestingly, many transcripts encoding proteins related to starch metabolism were altered in a manner that would be anticipated to promote starch synthesis. These included both structural enzymes of the Suc-to-starch conversion pathway, such as Suc synthase, the plastidial Glc-6-P translocator, and AGPase (Geigenberger, 2003
The results of this study demonstrate that decreased expression of potato apyrase isoforms via RNAi leads to changes in tuber development, resulting in a stimulation of longitudinal growth of the tubers. Changes in apyrase activity do not directly perturb major metabolic processes; rather, they lead to specific changes in the expression of nuclear genes encoding extensins that may explain the developmental alterations, since they are suggested to play a role in polar growth (Baumberger et al., 2001
Cloning Work
cDNA of StAPY2 and StAPY3
Genomic DNA of StAPY2
35S Overexpressor
35S-RNAi
B33-RNAi
StAPY3-GFP
Alignments were produced using the ClustalW algorithm embedded in the MegAlign software (DNAstar). This software was also used for sequence identity calculations using identity weight matrix. For homology searches, the GenBank database was explored using BLASTN (Altschul et al., 1997
The plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain pGV2260 using a gene pulser electroporator (Bio-Rad) as described by Mattanovich et al. (1989)
Desiree potato plants were cultivated in tissue culture for long-term storage and propagation. Cuttings were transferred to soil and grown in a phytotron for 2 weeks. Then the plants were transferred to pots with a diameter of 18 cm and grown in the phytotron (soil, 60%/75% humidity [day/night], 22°C/16°C, 400 µmol s–1 m2 light intensity, 16-h days and 18-h nights), a conditioned glasshouse (soil, 60% humidity, 22°C/16°C, 350 µmol s–1 m2 light intensity, 16-h days and 18-h nights), or in an uncontrolled greenhouse.
After separation of 20 µg of RNA derived from different tissues on a denaturing agarose gel and transfer on a membrane (Hybond-XL; APBiotech), the membrane was probed with the full-length fragment of StAPY3 labeled with 32P. Hybridization was detected using a BAS-1800II phosphoimager (Fuji).
After separation of 5 µg of tuber protein using PAGE and transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Roche), the membrane was probed with a serum directed against potato apyrase kindly provided by Dr. Pal Nyren (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm). Binding was detected enzymatically using a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad).
RNA was extracted from 60 mg fresh weight using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), and DNA was digested as suggested by the supplier. RNA (500 ng) was used to produce cDNA in a final volume of 100 µL using reverse transcriptase and RNase inhibitor provided by Invitrogen. For cDNA quantification, 2 µL was used as template in real-time PCR mixed with 10 µL of Power SYBR Green (Applied Bioscience) and 10 µL of primer mix (forward and reverse primers, each 0.5 µM). The following primer mixes were used for quantification: StAPY1 and StAPY3 (forward, 5'-GCTTGTTGATGGATTTGGACTAAA-3'; reverse, 5'-GCCATGCTGCTCCAACTAGATAG-3'), StAPY2 (forward, 5'-GCTTGTTGATGGATTTGGACTAAA-3'; reverse, 5'-GCCATGCTGCTTTAATTTGGTAA-3'), StGAPDH5' (forward, 5'-AAGGACAAGGCTGCTGCTCAC-3'; reverse, 5'-AACTCTGGCTTGTATTCATTCTCG-3'), StGAPDH3' (forward, 5'-TTCAACATCATCCCTAGCAGCACT-3'; reverse, 5'-TAAGGTCGACAACAGAAACATCAG-3'), and EF1-
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, labeling, hybridization, and scanning were performed as described previously (Degenkolbe et al., 2005
A 50-µL gold particle suspension (1 µm in diameter, 6% [w/v] in 50% glycerol) was mixed with 5 µL of plasmid DNA (0.5 µg/µL), 50 µL of 2.5 M CaCl2, and 20 µL of 0.1 M spermidine. After vortexing, the suspension was shortly centrifuged and washed four times with 100% ethanol. The suspension was then resuspended in 48 µL of 100% ethanol. A 10-µL gold particle suspension was transferred on a 1,100-psi rupture disc (Bio-Rad) and shot on freshly cut Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) C24 leaves placed upside down at a distance of 9 cm in a Bio-Rad PDS-1000 microprojectile bombardment system as described previously (Sohlenkamp et al., 2002
Nucleotides were quantified from TCA extracts prepared as described by Jelitto et al. (1992)
Determination of Matrix Sugar Composition
Determination of Uronic Acids
Determination of Crystalline Cellulose
Enzyme Extraction
Preparation of Apoplastic Washings
Apyrase/5'-Nucleotidase in Soluble Extracts or AWF
Apyrase/5'-Nucleotidase in Intact Tuber Slices
UGPase in Soluble Extracts or AWF
Respiration rates of two freshly prepared tuber discs (8 mm diameter and 2 mm thick) were analyzed in an oxygen electrode (Hansatech) filled with 1 mL of 20 mM MES/KOH, pH 6.0, as described previously (Loef et al., 1999 Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank data library under accession numbers AF535135 (StAPY2 mRNA), EU125183 (StAPY3 mRNA), and EU125182 (StAPY2 genomic DNA).
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
We thank Ewa Urbanczyk-Wochniak (Plant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK) and Matthew Hannah (Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology) for their support with the microarray analysis. We are grateful to Ulrike Haensel (Bayer CropScience, Frankfurt, Germany) and Peter Immerzeel (Umea Plant Science Center, Umea, Sweden) for their support with the cell wall analysis, to Axel Tiessen (CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Mexico) for providing nonaqueous fractions and marker activities, to Pal Nyren (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) for providing the anti-apyrase serum, and to Jens Kossman (Stellenbosch, South Africa) and Jeremy Clark (Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology) for advice in the beginning of the experiments. Received February 7, 2008; accepted May 12, 2008; published May 14, 2008.
1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. Ge 878/1–5). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Peter Geigenberger (geigenberger{at}mpimp-golm.mpg.de).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.117564 * Corresponding author; e-mail geigenberger{at}mpimp-golm.mpg.de.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402 Baumberger N, Ringli C, Keller B (2001) The chimeric leucine-rich repeat/extensin cell wall protein LRX1 is required for root hair morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev 15: 1128–1139 Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57: 289–300 Boudart G, Jamet E, Rossignol M, Lafitte C, Borderies G, Jauneau A, Esquerre-Tugaye MT, Pont-Lezica R (2005) Cell wall proteins in apoplastic fluids of Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes: identification by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. Proteomics 5: 212–221[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Che M, Nishida T, Gatmaitan Z, Arias IM (1992) A nucleoside transporter is functionally linked to ectonucleotidases in rat liver canalicular membrane. J Biol Chem 267: 9684–9688 Chivasa S, Ndimba BK, Simon WJ, Lindsey K, Slabas AR (2005) Extracellular ATP functions as an endogenous external metabolite regulating plant cell viability. Plant Cell 17: 3019–3034 Cohn JR, Uhm T, Ramu S, Nam YW, Kim DJ, Penmetsa RV, Wood TC, Denny RL, Young ND, Cook DR, et al (2001) Differential regulation of a family of apyrase genes from Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 125: 2104–2119 Day RB, McAlvin CB, Loh JT, Denny RL, Wood TC, Young ND, Stacey G (2000) Differential expression of two soybean apyrases, one of which is an early nodulin. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13: 1053–1070[Web of Science][Medline] Degenkolbe T, Hannah MA, Freund S, Hincha DK, Heyer AG, Kohl KI (2005) A quality-controlled microarray method for gene expression profiling. Anal Biochem 346: 217–224[Web of Science][Medline] Dische Z (1962) General color reactions. Methods Carbohydr Chem 1: 478–492 Dunkley TP, Watson R, Griffin JL, Dupree P, Lilley KS (2004) Localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT). Mol Cell Proteomics 3: 1128–1134 Englyst HN, Cummings JH (1984) Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109: 937–942[CrossRef] Etzler ME, Kalsi G, Ewing NN, Roberts NJ, Day RB, Murphy JB (1999) A nod factor binding lectin with apyrase activity from legume roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5856–5861 Fanta N, Anich M, Mancilla M, Kettlum AM, Valenzuela MA, Traverso-Cori A (1988) Starch, adenine nucleotides and apyrase changes during potato tuber development. Arch Biol Med Exp (Santiago) 21: 129–133 Farran I, Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Medina JF, Prieto J, Mingo-Castel AM (2002) Targeted expression of human serum albumin to potato tubers. Transgenic Res 11: 337–346[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Farre EM, Tiessen A, Roessner U, Geigenberger P, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L (2001) Analysis of the compartmentation of glycolytic intermediates, nucleotides, sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and sugar alcohols in potato tubers using a nonaqueous fractionation method. Plant Physiol 127: 685–700 Fecht-Christoffers MM, Fuhrs H, Braun HP, Horst WJ (2006) The role of hydrogen peroxide-producing and hydrogen peroxide-consuming peroxidases in the leaf apoplast of cowpea in manganese tolerance. Plant Physiol 140: 1451–1463 Fettke J, Poeste S, Eckermann N, Tiessen A, Pauly M, Geigenberger P, Steup M (2005) Analysis of cytosolic heteroglycans from leaves of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants that under- or overexpress the Pho 2 phosphorylase isozyme. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 1987–2004 Filisetti-Cozzi TM, Carpita NC (1991) Measurement of uronic acids without interference from neutral sugars. Anal Biochem 197: 157–162[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Geigenberger P (2003) Regulation of sucrose to starch conversion in growing potato tubers. J Exp Bot 54: 457–465 Geigenberger P, Fernie AR (2006) Starch biosynthesis in the potato tuber. In Food Biochemistry and Food Processing. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 253–270 Geigenberger P, Hajirezaei M, Geiger M, Deiting U, Sonnewald U, Stitt M (1998) Overexpression of pyrophosphatase leads to increased sucrose degradation and starch synthesis, increased activities of enzymes for sucrose-starch interconversions, and increased levels of nucleotides in growing potato tubers. Planta 205: 428–437[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Geigenberger P, Stitt M (1993) Sucrose synthase catalyzes a readily reversible reaction in vivo in developing potato tubers and other plant tissues. Planta 189: 329–339[CrossRef][Web of Science] Geigenberger P, Stitt M, Fernie AR (2004) Metabolic control analysis and regulation of the conversion of sucrose to starch in growing potato tubers. Plant Cell Environ 27: 655–673[CrossRef] Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80[CrossRef][Medline] Gleave AP (1992) A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organizational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol Biol 20: 1203–1207[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Hall Q, Cannon MC (2002) The cell wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein RSH is essential for normal embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 1161–1172 Handa M, Guidotti G (1996) Purification and cloning of a soluble ATP-diphosphohydrolase (apyrase) from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 218: 916–923[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Hsieh HL, Song CJ, Roux SJ (2000) Regulation of a recombinant pea nuclear apyrase by calmodulin and casein kinase II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1494: 248–255[Medline] Jelitto T, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L, Hajirezeai M, Stitt M (1992) Inorganic pyrophosphate content and metabolites in potato and tobacco plants expressing Escherichia coli pyrophosphatase in their cytosol. Planta 188: 238–244[CrossRef][Web of Science] Kalckar HM (1944) Adenylpyrophosphatase and myokinase. J Biol Chem 153: 355–367 Kalsi G, Etzler ME (2000) Localization of a Nod factor-binding protein in legume roots and factors influencing its distribution and expression. Plant Physiol 124: 1039–1048 Kettlun AM, Uribe L, Calvo V, Silva S, Rivera J, Mancilla M, Valenzuela MA, Traversocori A (1982) Properties of 2 apyrases from Solanum tuberosum. Phytochemistry 21: 551–558[CrossRef][Web of Science] Kim SY, Sivaguru M, Stacey G (2006) Extracellular ATP in plants: visualization, localization, and analysis of physiological significance in growth and signaling. Plant Physiol 142: 984–992 Kolbe A, Tiessen A, Schluepmann H, Paul M, Ulrich S, Geigenberger P (2005) Trehalose 6-phosphate regulates starch synthesis via posttranslational redox activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 11118–11123 Liu XJ, Prat S, Willmitzer L, Frommer WB (1990) Cis regulatory elements directing tuber-specific and sucrose-inducible expression of a chimeric class-I patatin promoter GUS-gene fusion. Mol Gen Genet 223: 401–406[Web of Science][Medline] Loef I, Stitt M, Geigenberger P (1999) Orotate leads to a specific increase in uridine nucleotide levels and a stimulation of sucrose degradation and starch synthesis in discs from growing potato tubers. Planta 209: 314–323[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Marcus AJ, Broekman MJ, Drosopoulos JH, Islam N, Alyonycheva TN, Safier LB, Hajjar KA, Posnett DN, Schoenborn MA, Schooley KA, et al (1997) The endothelial cell ecto-ADPase responsible for inhibition of platelet function is CD39. J Clin Invest 99: 1351–1360[Web of Science][Medline] Mattanovich D, Ruker F, Machado AD, Laimer M, Regner F, Steinkellner H, Himmler G, Katinger H (1989) Efficient transformation of Agrobacterium spp by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 6747 McAlvin CB, Stacey G (2005) Transgenic expression of the soybean apyrase in Lotus japonicus enhances nodulation. Plant Physiol 137: 1456–1462 Merkouropoulos G, Shirsat AH (2003) The unusual Arabidopsis extensin gene atExt1 is expressed throughout plant development and is induced by a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses. Planta 217: 356–366[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Molnar J, Lorand L (1961) Studies on apyrases. Arch Biochem Biophys 93: 353–363[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Neckelmann G, Orellana A (1998) Metabolism of uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucose in Golgi vesicles from pea stems. Plant Physiol 117: 1007–1014 Oliver SN, Tiessen A, Fernie AR, Geigenberger P (2008) Decreased expression of plastidial adenylate kinase in potato tubers results in an enhanced rate of respiration and a stimulation of starch synthesis that is attributable to post-translational redox-activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. J Exp Bot 59: 315–325 Orellana A, Neckelmann G, Norambuena L (1997) Topography and function of Golgi uridine-5'-diphosphatase from pea stems. Plant Physiol 114: 99–107[Abstract] Plesner L (1995) Ecto-ATPases: identities and functions. Int Rev Cytol 158: 141–214[Web of Science][Medline] Riewe D, Grosman L, Zauber H, Wucke C, Fernie AR, Geigenberger P (2008) Metabolic and developmental adaptations of growing potato tubers in response to specific manipulations of the adenylate energy status. Plant Physiol 146: 1579–1598 Roberts K, Shirsat AH (2006) Increased extensin levels in Arabidopsis affect inflorescence stem thickening and height. J Exp Bot 57: 537–545 Roberts NJ, Brigham J, Wu B, Murphy JB, Volpin H, Phillips DA, Etzler ME (1999) A Nod factor-binding lectin is a member of a distinct class of apyrases that may be unique to the legumes. Mol Gen Genet 262: 261–267[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Rocha-Sosa M, Sonnewald U, Frommer W, Stratmann M, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1989) Both developmental and metabolic signals activate the promoter of a class I patatin gene. EMBO J 8: 23–29[Web of Science][Medline] Roessner U, Luedemann A, Brust D, Fiehn O, Linke T, Willmitzer L, Fernie A (2001) Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13: 11–29 Rotter A, Usadel B, Baebler S, Stitt M, Gruden K (2007) Adaptation of the MapMan ontology to biotic stress responses: application in solanaceous species. Plant Methods 3: 10[CrossRef][Medline] Rumeau D, Maher EA, Kelman A, Showalter AM (1990) Extensin and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression altered in potato tubers in response to wounding, hypoxia, and Erwinia carotovora infection. Plant Physiol 93: 1134–1139 Serrato AJ, Perez-Ruiz JM, Spinola MC, Cejudo FJ (2004) A novel NADPH thioredoxin reductase, localized in the chloroplast, which deficiency causes hypersensitivity to abiotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 279: 43821–43827 Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS (2005) Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 21: 2067–2075 Sohlenkamp C, Wood CC, Roeb GW, Udvardi MK (2002) Characterization of Arabidopsis AtAMT2, a high-affinity ammonium transporter of the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 130: 1788–1796 Song CJ, Steinebrunner I, Wang X, Stout SC, Roux SJ (2006) Extracellular ATP induces the accumulation of superoxide via NADPH oxidases in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 140: 1222–1232 Steinebrunner I, Jeter C, Song C, Roux SJ (2000) Molecular and biochemical comparison of two different apyrases from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem 38: 913–922[CrossRef][Web of Science] Steinebrunner I, Wu J, Sun Y, Corbett A, Roux SJ (2003) Disruption of apyrases inhibits pollen germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 131: 1638–1647 Sweetlove LJ, Muller-Rober B, Willmitzer L, Hill SA (1999) The contribution of adenosine 5'-diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase to the control of starch synthesis in potato tubers. Planta 209: 330–337[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, Selbig J, Muller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37: 914–939[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Thomas C, Rajagopal A, Windsor B, Dudler R, Lloyd A, Roux SJ (2000) A role for ectophosphatase in xenobiotic resistance. Plant Cell 12: 519–533 Thomas C, Sun Y, Naus K, Lloyd A, Roux S (1999) Apyrase functions in plant phosphate nutrition and mobilizes phosphate from extracellular ATP. Plant Physiol 119: 543–551 Tiessen A, Hendriks JHM, Stitt M, Branscheid A, Gibon Y, Farre EM, Geigenberger P (2002) Starch synthesis in potato tubers is regulated by post-translational redox modification of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase: a novel regulatory mechanism linking starch synthesis to the sucrose supply. Plant Cell 14: 2191–2213 Tjaden J, Mohlmann T, Kampfenkel K, Henrichs G, Neuhaus HE (1998) Altered plastidic ATP/ADP-transporter activity influences potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber morphology, yield and composition of tuber starch. Plant J 16: 531–540[CrossRef][Web of Science] Todorov LD, Mihaylova-Todorova S, Westfall TD, Sneddon P, Kennedy C, Bjur RA, Westfall DP (1997) Neuronal release of soluble nucleotidases and their role in neurotransmitter inactivation. Nature 387: 76–79[CrossRef][Medline] Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem 32: 420–424[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Voelker C, Schmidt D, Mueller-Roeber B, Czempinski K (2006) Members of the Arabidopsis AtTPK/KCO family form homomeric vacuolar channels in planta. Plant J 48: 296–306[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wesley SV, Helliwell CA, Smith NA, Wang MB, Rouse DT, Liu Q, Gooding PS, Singh SP, Abbott D, Stoutjesdijk PA, et al (2001) Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J 27: 581–590[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Windsor B, Roux SJ, Lloyd A (2003) Multiherbicide tolerance conferred by AtPgp1 and apyrase overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 21: 428–433[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wolf C, Hennig M, Romanovicz D, Steinebrunner I (2007) Developmental defects and seedling lethality in apyrase AtAPY1 and AtAPY2 double knockout mutants. Plant Mol Biol 64: 657–672[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wu H, de Graaf B, Mariani C, Cheung AY (2001) Hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins in plant reproductive tissues: structure, functions and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 58: 1418–1429[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wu J, Steinebrunner I, Sun Y, Butterfield T, Torres J, Arnold D, Gonzalez A, Jacob F, Reichler S, Roux SJ (2007) Apyrases (nucleoside triphosphate-diphosphohydrolases) play a key role in growth control in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 144: 961–975 Zhang L, Greiten C, Schmitz I, Haferkamp I, Neuhaus HE, Hausler RE, Flugge UI, Ludewig F (2006) Impact of glucose 6-phosphate import into amyloplasts on potato tuber starch content. In DP Bourque, ed, 8th International Congress of Plant Molecular Biology, Adelaide, Australia. International Society for Plant Molecular Biology, Athens, GA, p 93 Zrenner R, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U (1993) Analysis of the expression of potato uridinediphosphate-glucose pyrophosphorylase and its inhibition by antisense RNA. Planta 190: 247–252[Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|