|
|
||||||||
|
First published online July 3, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.123489 Plant Physiology 148:467-478 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Integration of Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism with Energy Production Is Crucial to Light Acclimation in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis1,[W],[OA]Department of Biology (A.K.S., M.B.-P., H.B.P.), Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering (T.E.), and School of Engineering (H.B.P.), Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130; Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104 (R.A.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409 (B.G.)
Light drives the production of chemical energy and reducing equivalents in photosynthetic organisms required for the assimilation of essential nutrients. This process also generates strong oxidants and reductants that can be damaging to the cellular processes, especially during absorption of excess excitation energy. Cyanobacteria, like other oxygenic photosynthetic organisms, respond to increases in the excitation energy, such as during exposure of cells to high light (HL) by the reduction of antenna size and photosystem content. However, the mechanism of how Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, a cyanobacterium, maintains redox homeostasis and coordinates various metabolic processes under HL stress remains poorly understood. In this study, we have utilized time series transcriptome data to elucidate the global responses of Synechocystis to HL. Identification of differentially regulated genes involved in the regulation, protection, and maintenance of redox homeostasis has offered important insights into the optimized response of Synechocystis to HL. Our results indicate a comprehensive integrated homeostatic interaction between energy production (photosynthesis) and energy consumption (assimilation of carbon and nitrogen). In addition, measurements of physiological parameters under different growth conditions showed that integration between the two processes is not a consequence of limitations in the external carbon and nitrogen levels available to the cells. We have also discovered the existence of a novel glycosylation pathway, to date known as an important nutrient sensor only in eukaryotes. Up-regulation of a gene encoding the rate-limiting enzyme in the hexosamine pathway suggests a regulatory role for protein glycosylation in Synechocystis under HL.
All organisms require carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus, and sulfur (S) as macronutrients for growth and development. Reduced C is essential both as building blocks in metabolic reactions and as energy sources for all organisms. Photosynthetic organisms generate reduced C through photosynthesis. These organisms use solar energy to generate chemical energy and reducing power to fix atmospheric C and assimilate other nutrients. Thus, light represents an essential nutrient for these organisms. Light also represents a significant problem for the photosynthetic organisms since duration and changes in the quality and quantity of light energy perceived by these organisms is unavoidable under natural conditions. When light perceived by photosynthetic organisms cannot be completely utilized for downstream processes, it leads to a redox imbalance and an excessive production of damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS; Apel and Hirt, 2004
Genome-wide transcriptional investigations have greatly aided the understanding of molecular mechanisms by which photosynthetic organisms adapt to fluctuations of environmental and metabolic cues. Recent studies in higher plants have revealed the existence of complex, interconnected regulatory and signaling networks. These networks allow them to fine tune growth and development in response to environmental and metabolic cues (Wang et al., 2003
We have utilized a DNA microarray chip developed using Agilent technology that offers significant improvements in data generation. Such improvements have allowed us to confidently identify gene transcripts, including those present in low abundance. We have utilized these DNA chips to understand the response of Synechocystis to HL at ambient CO2 (i.e. 0.04%). Growth and treatment conditions used in this study are significantly different compared to Hihara et al. (2001)
Physiological Response of Synechocystis to HL Absorption of photons by pigments associated with PSII elevates them to an electronic excited state. These pigments return to the ground state primarily via three routes (Fig. 1A ). Measurement of fluorescence from cells under a given condition can be used to gather real-time information on the status of the photosynthetic process. One such measurement is the determination of the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence (Fv/Fm), which is interpreted as a measure of maximal quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry. When cells grown at low light (LL) were transitioned to HL, the Fv/Fm ratio declined rapidly and remained low up to 3 h (Fig. 1B). By 6 h of HL treatment, the Fv/Fm ratio began to increase and a significant increase in the Fv/Fm ratio was observed during further HL treatment (data not shown). These results suggest that photodamage to photosynthetic complexes occurs immediately upon transition to HL and recovery could be observed by 6 h under our experimental conditions. Therefore, we sampled cells up to 6 h following HL treatment as they appear to have attained homeostasis by 6 h.
Summary of Genes Regulated by HL
An overview of the impact of HL on gene regulation for various functional categories is provided in Supplemental Table S1. In total, 762 genes showed differential regulation in response to HL that differed by at least 1.3-fold (P < 0.01). The fold change of 1.3x was experimentally verified using real-time PCR and, combined with the P-value determinants, can be confidently used as criteria to identify differential regulation of a gene (Supplemental Table S2). We attribute the confidence in a 1.3-fold cutoff to the significant improvement in data generation by using the custom-designed Agilent chips. A comparative analysis of differentially regulated genes obtained in this work with those identified by Hihara et al. (2001
Cluster Analysis of Differentially Regulated Genes Using Discretized Expressions Coregulated genes were clustered using discretized expressions that have many advantages over traditional clustering methods (see "Materials and Methods"). Overall, differentially regulated genes were grouped into 11 unique clusters that showed time-dependent patterns of regulation (Fig. 2). In addition, there were 31 genes (approximately 4% of selected genes) that could not be grouped into any of 11 unique clusters. Genes present in cluster 1 (290 genes, i.e. approximately 38% of selected genes), cluster 2 (94 genes, i.e. approximately 12% of selected genes), and cluster 3 (50 genes, i.e. approximately 6% of selected genes) were down-regulated following 15 min, 1 h, and 2 h of HL treatment, respectively. Genes present in cluster 4 (29 genes, i.e. approximately 4% of selected genes) transiently decreased at 15 min and returned to initial levels by 1 h in response to HL. Genes in cluster 5 (19 genes, i.e. approximately 3% of selected genes) and cluster 6 (38 genes, i.e. approximately 5% of selected genes) were down-regulated following 15 min and 1 h of HL treatment, respectively, but returned to initial levels by 6 h. Genes present in cluster 7 (11 genes, i.e. approximately 1% of selected genes) transiently decreased, but increased following 1 h in response to HL and remained high. Genes present in cluster 8 (105 genes, i.e. approximately 14% of selected genes), cluster 9 (33 genes, i.e. approximately 4% of selected genes), and cluster 10 (24 genes, i.e. approximately 3% of selected genes) were up-regulated following 15 min, 1 h, and 2 h of HL treatment, respectively. Genes in cluster 11 (38 genes, i.e. approximately 5% of selected genes) transiently increased at 15 min, but returned to initial levels by 1 h in response to HL treatment.
It is apparent from these cluster analyses that large numbers of genes are down-regulated, suggesting that negative regulation of gene expression is a major response to HL in Synechocystis. Importantly, genes involved in the specific functions followed similar regulatory patterns (Supplemental Table S3). However, in a few cases, genes belonging to a given pathway are present in different clusters because of the differing patterns of regulation. For example, the psbA gene coding for the D1 protein of PSII was up-regulated in response to HL compared to down-regulation of other PSII genes (Supplemental Fig. S4). The increased expression of the psbA gene is related to increased photodamage of D1 protein caused by the over-reduction of components involved in the electron transport chain. Similarly, two genes, IF7 and IF17, involved in the inhibition of Gln synthase (GS) type I activity (Garcia-Dominguez et al., 1999
Genes encoding proteins involved in the photosynthetic process were mostly down-regulated in response to HL (Fig. 3
; also see Supplemental Table S3). A similar response was also reported by Hihara et al. (2001)
Genes encoding phycobilisome proteins and those involved in pigment biosynthesis were down-regulated in parallel with a down-regulation of photosystem genes (Fig. 3). We observed that genes coding for phycocyanin, allophycocyanin, and the linker proteins were all down-regulated to similar extents in response to HL (Supplemental Fig. S4). This is in contrast to the report by Hihara et al. (2001) -aminolevulinate were down-regulated, whereas those coding for proteins involved in the conversion of -aminolevulinate to protoporphyrin IX were not regulated. Finally, key genes involved in the conversion of protoporphyrin IX to chlorophyll and bilins were down-regulated. A similar regulation of genes coding for proteins involved in pigment biosynthesis has been observed previously (Singh et al., 2003
Genes coding for Rubisco, CO2-concentrating mechanism proteins, and proteins involved in glycolysis were down-regulated in response to HL. In contrast, we found significant up-regulation of genes encoding transporters involved in C transport (Fig. 3). This included both BCT1 and SbtA transporters that are known to be induced under C-limiting conditions (Wang et al., 2004
Regulation of genes involved in the assimilation of N by Synechocystis during HL treatment showed an integrated response with genes involved in CO2 fixation (Fig. 3). Genes encoding for proteins involved in nitrate assimilation and transport (nrt operon), as well as ammonium and urea transport, were down-regulated in response to HL. In addition, several genes involved in the GS-GOGAT pathway were also regulated. GS combines Glu and ammonia to generate Gln using ATP produced by photosynthesis. GOGAT combines Gln produced in the first step of the pathway with 2-oxoglutarate to produce two glutamates. glnA and glnN genes encoding subunits of GS were down-regulated in response to HL. In contrast, glsF and gltB, which encode GOGAT, were not regulated in response to HL, whereas the gltD gene encoding NADH-GOGAT was slightly down-regulated. In contrast, genes encoding IF7 and IF17 were strongly up-regulated by HL treatment. These two proteins inhibit activity of GS type I by protein-protein interaction (Garcia-Dominguez et al., 1999
A number of genes coding for proteins involved in the maintenance of redox homeostasis, cellular protection, and regulation of gene expression were differentially controlled by HL (Fig. 3). Redoxins, such as thioredoxins (Trxs), glutaredoxins (Grxs), and peroxiredoxins, play critical roles in the cellular protection and maintenance of redox homeostasis within cells (Dietz, 2003
Genes encoding chaperones, including GroELS, HtpG, DnaK, and HspA, showed temporal up-regulation in response to HL (Fig. 3). We also found that genes coding for proteases and HL-inducible proteins (HLIPs) were significantly up-regulated in response to HL. HLIPs are small proteins suggested to be involved in the photoprotection of PSI (Salem and van Waasbergen, 2004
A number of His kinase and response regulator genes were regulated in response to HL (Supplemental Table S3). glnB, ntcA, lexA, and slr2024 genes were all down-regulated in response to HL (Fig. 3). NtcA is a positive regulator of many genes involved in N assimilation, whereas PII encoded by glnB is considered to be a key sensor of the intracellular C/N ratio (Forchhammer, 2004
A single-copy gene (sll0220) encoding Gln:Fru-6-P amidotransferase (GFAT) was consistently up-regulated throughout HL treatment (cluster 8). GFAT catalyzes the formation of glucosamine-6-P from Fru-6-P (Fig. 4
). It is the rate-limiting enzyme of the HS pathway, which is required for O-glycosylation of soluble proteins in eukaryotes and in some bacteria (Love and Hanover, 2005
Response of Synechocystis to HL in the Presence of Excess Nutrients
The results presented in this work from DNA microarray experiments suggest that Synechocystis cells limit the assimilation of C and N during initial HL treatment. To rule out the possibility that key nutrients were not limiting, we measured growth rates and Fv/Fm ratios in response to HL in the presence of excess C and N added just before HL treatment, as well as in cells preadapted to growth in BG11 medium supplemented either with 10 mM HCO3– or 3% CO2 (Table I). The growth rates and Fv/Fm ratios measured in the presence of 10 mM HCO3–, 50 mM NO3–, or 3% CO2 during HL treatment were indistinguishable from HL-treated cells grown in air. Under all growth conditions, the Fv/Fm ratio decreased during the first 30 min of HL treatment and a recovery could be seen by 6 h, which was completed by 24 h. In contrast, cells adapted to 10 mM HCO3– or 3% CO2 responded differently to HL. The Fv/Fm ratio in cells adapted to 3% CO2 decreased to a lesser extent and recovery was faster as compared to air-grown and HCO3–-adapted cells. The HCO3–-adapted cells appeared to be more sensitive to HL and their response was similar to air-grown cells. Moreover, cells adapted to 3% CO2 showed faster growth during HL treatment similar to the growth rates as reported by Hihara et al. (2001)
In this study, we have combined transcriptome data with measurements of physiological parameters under different growth conditions to elucidate global physiological responses to HL in Synechocystis. Figure 6 describes the coordination between pathways inferred from the transcriptome data during HL treatment in Synechocystis at ambient CO2 concentration. Synechocystis, with its large content of photosystems and antenna size to maximize light absorption under LL growth conditions, undergoes photodamage during HL treatment as revealed by Fv/Fm ratios. This photodamage is a result of the accumulation of reduced components involved in electron transport due to the increased excitation by HL and not because of the presence of limited amounts of CO2 that could intimately lead to the accumulation of reduced components. This is also apparent from results indicating that presence of HCO3– or 3% CO2 during HL treatment had similar effects on growth rates and Fv/Fm ratios as cells under 0.04% CO2. Cells adjust to HL by down-regulating genes coding for PSII, PSI, phycobilisome, ATP synthase, and genes involved in pigment biosynthesis. Down-regulation of these genes corresponds with the well-known physiological mechanism that reduction in photosystem content is a mechanistically key adaptive response to prevent over-reduction of components involved in the electron transport chain. An immediate consequence of this photodamage is a decreased output of products from the light reactions.
The limited energy production during the initial period of HL treatment affected the ability of cells to fix CO2. This was evident from the down-regulation of genes encoding CO2-concentrating mechanism proteins and Rubisco. The reduced CO2 fixation triggered an integrated homeostatic response in the assimilation of N and led to the down-regulation of genes involved in N transport, assimilation, and regulation. In cyanobacteria, two proteins, PII and NtcA, control N assimilation (Forchhammer, 2004
Our transcriptome data also showed that cells maintain redox poise during HL by differential regulation of key genes coding for peroxiredoxins, Grxs, Trxs, MvrA, and flavoprotein monooxygenase. Whereas some of these may simply be involved in maintaining the redox poise, others may also act as redox-dependent signaling. Up-regulation of a gene coding for a putative flavoprotein monooxygenase is particularly intriguing. This protein has been suggested to be a vital component of redox machinery of cells involved in the oxidation of a variety of thiols, including GSH, Cys, and cysteamine using molecular oxygen and NADPH in yeast (Suh et al., 1999
It appears that Synechocystis responds to HL by utilizing multiple regulatory inputs that interact in a multidimensional network to regulate gene expression required to maintain the homeostasis of various metabolic pathways (Fig. 6). The existence of such a regulatory network is evident from the regulation of PII, TrxA, and LexA. All three proteins have been shown to regulate enzymes involved in pathways leading to the assimilation of C and N (Lindahl and Florencio, 2003 In conclusion, transcriptome data presented in this study in response to HL has led us to a better understanding of integrated responses between various pathways and processes required for the maintenance of redox homeostasis during HL. Our results show that most metabolic pathways are closely linked to primary energy production (Fig. 6). This coordination between processes appears to be a result of complex networking of overlapping signaling pathways that coordinate to regulate gene expression to optimize metabolic adjustments. The identification of various candidate genes, as well as the presence of several hypothetical and unknown genes in various clusters, provides a way forward toward understanding their specific contribution during HL stress.
Growth Conditions and HL Treatment Synechocystis cells were grown at 30°C in BG11 medium buffered with 10 mM TES-KOH (pH 8.2) and bubbled with air. Illumination was at 30 µE m–2 s–1 (LL) provided by fluorescent cool-white lights. Cell growth was monitored by measuring OD at 730 nm on a DW2000 (SLM-AMINCO). For HL treatment, cells grown at LL were transferred in a long test tube (3 cm in diameter) to a cell density of approximately 5 x 107 cells/mL. The tubes containing cells were transferred in a thermostat water bath maintained at 30°C and illuminated with a white-light intensity of 300 µE m–2 s–1 (HL). Cells were air bubbled during HL treatment. Cells from LL- and HL-illuminated cultures were collected after 15 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and 6 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000g, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C.
Fluorescence induction kinetics at room temperature were performed on a dual modulation kinetic fluorometer (model FL-100; Photon Systems Instruments) interfaced with a computer.
Total RNA from Synechocystis cells was isolated using RNAwiz kit (Ambion) as described by the manufacturer, with some modifications. Briefly, 1 mL of prewarmed RNAwiz at 70°C was pipetted directly into the frozen cells and mixed quickly by vortexing. Following 10-min incubation at 70°C, 0.2 mL of chloroform was added, vigorously mixed, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The phase separation was achieved by centrifugation (15 min, 23,000g, 4°C). The aqueous phase containing RNA was transferred in a new Eppendorf tube and an equal volume of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water was added, extracted with water-saturated phenol, and finally precipitated by the addition of equal volume of isopropanol. Subsequently, total RNA were pelleted by centrifugation (20 min, 23,000g, 4°C), washed with 75% ethanol, and resuspended in 50 µL of DEPC-treated water. The quantity and quality of extracted RNA were determined spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop) at 260 and 280 nm and by Bio-Analyzer (Agilent).
Total RNA isolated from LL- and HL-treated cells was fluorescently labeled either with Cy3 or Cy5 using the MICROMAX ASAP RNA-labeling kit (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two micrograms of total RNA, diluted in the ASAP labeling buffer on ice to a final volume of 19 µL and 1 µL of either Cy3 or Cy5 chemical-labeling reagent, respectively, was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was incubated at 85°C for 15 min in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf). The reaction mixture was transferred to ice and 5 µL of ASAP stop solution was added to the reaction mixture. The labeled RNA was individually purified using a PCR purification spin column (Zymo Research) and eluted with 20 µL of DEPC-treated water. The specific activity of the labeled RNA was determined in a Nanodrop.
The Synechocystis 11K oligo DNA microarray used in these studies was custom designed and constructed using Agilent noncontact inkjet technology (Agilent). This technology avoids the defects caused by the surface tension interaction with the microarray surface and results in the construction of microarray with more uniform and consistent features. The probes printed on these arrays are 60-mer oligomers that are known to yield excellent sensitivity and specificity compared to cDNA-based DNA microarray and 20-mer oligomer. Candidate oligonucleotides representing 3,459 genes in Synechocystis were selected from the 3' end of genes. The selected probes were filtered according to optimal base-composition profiles and screened on the basis of predicted hybridization properties and potential cross-hybridization with other sequences. For genes >0.9 kb, an additional probe corresponding to the 5' region of gene was selected. In the case of genes present on plasmids, target sequences were selected based on self-annotation (Kazusa annotation for plasmids was not available at the time of microarray design). The predicted ORFs from plasmids matched for >95% of currently annotated ORFs; some were represented by multiple oligos and some selected probes did not correspond to any ORF currently annotated in Cyanobase. We also randomly duplicated some probes to provide experimental evidence on intra-array variance. Each microarray slide consisted of two identical arrays consisting of 8,091 probes.
Fluorescently labeled probes were hybridized to Synechocystis 11K custom oligo DNA microarrays. For each array, we mixed 700 ng of Cy3- and Cy5-labeled RNA to a final specific activity of 50 pmol/µg of RNA. Cold RNA was added to adjust the total amount of RNA to 700 ng in the case of higher specific activity of labeled probe. Hybridization, scanning, and data extraction were performed by MOgene (www.mogene.com). Hybridization and wash processes were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Agilent). The hybridized microarrays were scanned using an Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent). Feature extraction software (Agilent) was used for the image analysis and data extraction processes using parameters optimized for prokaryotic arrays. The transcriptome data generated in this work has been submitted to the ArrayExpress database at the European Bioinformatics Institute (accession no. E-TABM-333).
The experimental design used to identify differentially regulated genes in response to HL is shown in Supplemental Figure S1A. For each time point, we have used two biological replicates and each biological replicate consists of three process replicates, including a dye swap. Preparation of fluorescent-labeled probes by direct labeling of RNA avoided bias introduced by reverse transcription of mRNA and resulted in excellent signal-to-noise ratio (Supplemental Fig. S1B). Microarray data were processed using Matlab (MathWorks). A single microarray consisted of 8,635 probes, including 544 control probes. We excluded the control probes from further analysis. The coefficient of variation (CV) of individual spots was used to quantify the intensity distribution of individual pixels categorized as signal or background. It was observed that, on average, more than 85% of spots for green channel had a CV value <10%, whereas the corresponding percentage for red channel was 70%. Furthermore, except for few spots (<10 of 8,091), a majority of spots had a CV value <20%. These results show that the pixel intensity variation within the spot was quite low. Similar results were also observed for the background. The pixel intensities obtained from a 16-bit scanner (Agilent Technologies Scanner G2505B US22502547) would be between 0 to 65,535. We observed signal intensities of the spots in the range of 100 to 65,000, suggesting that the distribution of spot intensities was very good (Supplemental Fig. S1C). Mean intensity of spots for a given chip was found to be between 1,500 to 3,200, whereas background intensities varied in the range of 40 to 50. This suggests clear separation between signal and background. In addition, very few spots contained saturated pixels. Thus, data obtained in the present study using the direct-labeling technique and DNA microarray were of high quality.
We used the local weighted linear regression (LOWESS)-based data normalization procedure for removing the intensity-based trends observed in the microarray data. It has been suggested that LOWESS performs well when there are systematic trends in the data compared to other data normalization techniques (Quackenbush, 2002 The standard t test was used to quantify the consistency of measurements across different microarrays. P value was calculated with the null hypothesis that the samples are from a distribution with zero mean. To pick differentially expressed genes, we employed two-way criteria. A gene was considered as differentially expressed if the absolute value of its log2 ratio value exceeded a particular threshold and P value was less than a given significance level at any of the time points over the observations. Due to the high quality of the data, we were able to use 1% significance level for the P-value cutoff. A threshold of ±0.3785 (i.e. ±1.3-fold change) was used as the cutoff for the log ratio. We further established using real-time PCR experiments that 1.3-fold changes reported in microarray measurements are indeed a true differential behavior of the genes (Supplemental Table S2). Under these criteria, 762 genes were identified as differentially expressed in response to HL treatment and used for further analysis.
The main behavioral patterns within the gene expression data were identified by cluster analysis using discretized expressions. This approach offers several advantages compared to other available methods for clustering. First, it does not require specifying the number of clusters beforehand because different patterns in the data are readily observed; second, it is less sensitive to the inherent noise in the data and, finally, it can group genes with some nonlinear relations. Gene expressions at any given time points were discretized to three levels, namely, 1 if log ratio value >0.3785 (up-regulated genes), –1 if log ratio value <–0.3785 (down-regulated genes), and 0 for genes not differentially regulated, to get a discretized vector for each gene. Genes with similar vectors were grouped together and put in a cluster. After an initial phase of clustering, we combined clusters that did not show significant differences among each other. Using this approach, the differentially regulated genes were grouped in 11 clusters that showed distinct behavioral patterns of genes. Those genes which did not fall into any of these categories were combined in cluster 12 (Fig. 2).
Total cell extracts from Synechocystis were isolated as described previously (Kashino et al., 2002
Total RNA extracted from Synechocystis cells exposed to different light conditions were treated with RNase-free DNase I (Invitrogen) and used for RT reaction. The cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II (Invitrogen) and random hexamer primers. The cDNA products were amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers (Supplemental Table S2) and analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel. The RNase P gene was used as a control template.
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
We thank Natasha E. Zachara for the generous gift of BSA-Aminophenyl-GlcNAc and helpful discussion on the glycosylation assay. We also thank S. Rangwala (MOgene) for his help in the DNA microarray experiments and the members of the Pakrasi laboratory for collegial discussions. Received May 23, 2008; accepted June 12, 2008; published July 3, 2008.
1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Frontiers in Integrative Biological Research program (grant no. EF0425749). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Himadri B. Pakrasi (pakrasi{at}wustl.edu).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.123489 * Corresponding author; e-mail pakrasi{at}wustl.edu.
Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 373–379[CrossRef][Medline] Aurora R, Hihara Y, Singh AK, Pakrasi HB (2007) A network of genes regulated by light in cyanobacteria. OMICS 11: 166–185[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Boudreau E, Takahashi Y, Lemieux C, Turmel M, Rochaix JD (1997) The chloroplast ycf3 and ycf4 open reading frames of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are required for the accumulation of the photosystem I complex. EMBO J 16: 6095–6104[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Comer FI, Vosseller K, Wells L, Accavitti MA, Hart GW (2001) Characterization of a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for O-linked N-acetylglucosamine. Anal Biochem 293: 169–177[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Dietz KJ (2003) Redox control, redox signaling, and redox homeostasis in plant cells. Int Rev Cytol 228: 141–193[Web of Science][Medline] Domain F, Houot L, Chauvat F, Cassier-Chauvat C (2004) Function and regulation of the cyanobacterial genes lexA, recA and ruvB: LexA is critical to the survival of cells facing inorganic carbon starvation. Mol Microbiol 53: 65–80[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Forchhammer K (2004) Global carbon/nitrogen control by PII signal transduction in cyanobacteria: from signals to targets. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28: 319–333[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Garcia-Dominguez M, Reyes JC, Florencio FJ (1999) Glutamine synthetase inactivation by protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 7161–7166 Gutierrez RA, Lejay LV, Dean A, Chiaromonte F, Shasha DE, Coruzzi GM (2007) Qualitative network models and genome-wide expression data define carbon/nitrogen-responsive molecular machines in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 8: R7[CrossRef][Medline] Hihara Y, Kamei A, Kanehisa M, Kaplan A, Ikeuchi M (2001) DNA microarray analysis of cyanobacterial gene expression during acclimation to high light. Plant Cell 13: 793–806 Hihara Y, Sonoike K, Ikeuchi M (1998) A novel gene, pmgA, specifically regulates photosystem stoichiometry in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis species PCC 6803 in response to high light. Plant Physiol 117: 1205–1216 Hisbergues M, Jeanjean R, Joset F, Tandeau de Marsac N, Bedu S (1999) Protein PII regulates both inorganic carbon and nitrate uptake and is modified by a redox signal in synechocystis PCC 6803. FEBS Lett 463: 216–220[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Huang L, McCluskey MP, Ni H, LaRossa RA (2002) Global gene expression profiles of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 in response to irradiation with UV-B and white light. J Bacteriol 184: 6845–6858 Ikeuchi M, Shukla VK, Pakrasi HB, Inoue I (1995) Directed inactivation of the psbI gene does not affect photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Mol Gen Genet 249: 622–628[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Ivleva NB, Gao T, LiWang AC, Golden SS (2006) Quinone sensing by the circadian input kinase of the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17468–17473 Jacobsen SE, Binkowski KA, Olszewski NE (1996) SPINDLY, a tetratricopeptide repeat protein involved in gibberellin signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 9292–9296 Jantaro S, Ali Q, Lone S, He Q (2006) Suppression of the lethality of high light to a quadruple HLI mutant by the inactivation of the regulatory protein PfsR in Synechocystis PCC 6803. J Biol Chem 281: 30865–30874 Kashino Y, Lauber WM, Carroll JA, Wang Q, Whitmarsh J, Satoh K, Pakrasi HB (2002) Proteomic analysis of a highly active photosystem II preparation from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 reveals the presence of novel polypeptides. Biochemistry 41: 8004–8012[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Klughammer B, Sultemeyer D, Badger MR, Price GD (1999) The involvement of NAD(P)H dehydrogenase subunits, NdhD3 and NdhF3, in high-affinity CO2 uptake in Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 gives evidence for multiple NDH-1 complexes with specific roles in cyanobacteria. Mol Microbiol 32: 1305–1315[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Li H, Singh AK, McIntyre LM, Sherman LA (2004) Differential gene expression in response to hydrogen peroxide and the putative PerR regulon of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. J Bacteriol 186: 3331–3345 Lind LK, Shukla VK, Nyhus KJ, Pakrasi HB (1993) Genetic and immunological analyses of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 show that the protein encoded by the psbJ gene regulates the number of photosystem II centers in thylakoid membranes. J Biol Chem 268: 1575–1579 Lindahl M, Florencio FJ (2003) Thioredoxin-linked processes in cyanobacteria are as numerous as in chloroplasts, but targets are different. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 16107–16112 Love DC, Hanover JA (2005) The hexosamine signaling pathway: deciphering the "O-GlcNAc code". Sci STKE 312: re13 Mishina TE, Zeier J (2006) The Arabidopsis flavin-dependent monooxygenase FMO1 is an essential component of biologically induced systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 141: 1666–1675 Montgomery BL, Lagarias JC (2002) Phytochrome ancestry: sensors of bilins and light. Trends Plant Sci 7: 357–366[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Muro-Pastor MI, Reyes JC, Florencio FJ (2001) Cyanobacteria perceive nitrogen status by sensing intracellular 2-oxoglutarate levels. J Biol Chem 276: 38320–38328 Nefedova LN, Fantin Iu S, Zinchenko VV, Babykin MM (2003) The prqA and mvrA genes encoding carrier proteins control resistance to methyl viologen in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Genetika 39: 336–340[Medline] Ohkawa H, Pakrasi HB, Ogawa T (2002) Two types of functionally distinct NAD(P)H dehydrogenases in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. J Biol Chem 275: 31630–31634[CrossRef] Omata T, Price GD, Badger MR, Okamura M, Gohta S, Ogawa T (1999) Identification of an ATP-binding cassette transporter involved in bicarbonate uptake in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 13571–13576 Pakrasi HB, Williams JG, Arntzen CJ (1988) Targeted mutagenesis of the psbE and psbF genes blocks photosynthetic electron transport: evidence for a functional role of cytochrome b559 in photosystem II. EMBO J 7: 325–332[Web of Science][Medline] Pfannschmidt T (2003) Chloroplast redox signals: how photosynthesis controls its own genes. Trends Plant Sci 8: 33–41[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Quackenbush J (2002) Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32: 496–501[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Regel RE, Ivleva NB, Zer H, Meurer J, Shestakov SV, Herrmann RG, Pakrasi HB, Ohad I (2001) Deregulation of electron flow within photosystem II in the absence of the PsbJ protein. J Biol Chem 276: 41473–41478 Salem K, van Waasbergen LG (2004) Light control of hliA transcription and transcript stability in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus strain PCC 7942. J Bacteriol 186: 1729–1736 Satoh A, Kurano N, Senger H, Miyachi S (2002) Regulation of energy balance in photosystems in response to changes in CO2 concentrations and light intensities during growth in extremely-high-CO2-tolerant green microalgae. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 440–451 Scheibe R, Backhausen JE, Emmerlich V, Holtgrefe S (2005) Strategies to maintain redox homeostasis during photosynthesis under changing conditions. J Exp Bot 56: 1481–1489 Shen A, Kamp HD, Grundling A, Higgins DE (2006) A bifunctional O-GlcNAc transferase governs flagellar motility through anti-repression. Genes Dev 20: 3283–3295 Shibata M, Katoh H, Sonoda M, Ohkawa H, Shimoyama M, Fukuzawa H, Kaplan A, Ogawa T (2002) Genes essential to sodium-dependent bicarbonate transport in cyanobacteria: function and phylogenetic analysis. J Biol Chem 277: 18658–18664 Singh AK, McIntyre LM, Sherman LA (2003) Microarray analysis of the genome-wide response to iron deficiency and iron reconstitution in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Physiol 132: 1825–1839 Suh JK, Poulsen LL, Ziegler DM, Robertus JD (1999) Yeast flavin-containing monooxygenase generates oxidizing equivalents that control protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 2687–2691 Wang HL, Postier BL, Burnap RL (2004) Alterations in global patterns of gene expression in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in response to inorganic carbon limitation and the inactivation of ndhR, a LysR family regulator. J Biol Chem 279: 5739–5751 Wang R, Okamoto M, Xing X, Crawford NM (2003) Microarray analysis of the nitrate response in Arabidopsis roots and shoots reveals over 1,000 rapidly responding genes and new linkages to glucose, trehalose-6-phosphate, iron, and sulfate metabolism. Plant Physiol 132: 556–567 Wang Y, Sun J, Chitnis PR (2000) Proteomic study of the peripheral proteins from thylakoid membranes of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Electrophoresis 21: 1746–1754[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Yoshimura H, Yanagisawa S, Kanehisa M, Ohmori M (2002) Screening for the target gene of cyanobacterial cAMP receptor protein SYCRP1. Mol Microbiol 43: 843–853[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Zhulin IB, Taylor BL (1998) Correlation of PAS domains with electron transport-associated proteins in completely sequenced microbial genomes. Mol Microbiol 29: 1522–1523[Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|