Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 148:1185-1186 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
ON THE INSIDE

On the Inside


Malic Acid Recruits Beneficial Soil Bacteria

Mutualistic associations between roots and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) help protect plants from soil-borne pathogens. Symbioses with PGPR can also trigger induced systemic resistance in the aerial portions of plants. Despite the importance of PGPR associations in plant defense, little is known about the genetic and biochemical changes responsible for the attraction of PGPR to the rhizosphere. In this issue, Rudrappa et al. (pp. 1547–1556) present evidence that L-malic acid secreted from the roots of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) selectively signals and recruits the beneficial rhizobacterium Bacillus subtilis FB17 in a dose-dependent manner. Elevated levels of L-malic acid also promote the formation of FB17 biofilm on Arabidopsis roots. Underscoring the breadth and sophistication of plant-microbial interactions, it also appears that plants can recruit PGPR in response to foliar infections. For example, root secretions of L-malic acid are induced by the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Thus, L-malic acid is involved in the recruitment of beneficial microbes to the rhizosphere.


Shade Avoidance and Light Regulation of Cell Wall Enzymes

The shoots of shorter plants within dense stands often undergo rapid shoot elongation. This shade avoidance response improves the chances that these plants will gain access to sufficient sunlight for survival. Shading influences plant growth because it changes the spectral composition of the light impacting these plants. In shaded areas, the preferential absorption of red (R) wavelengths by surrounding vegetation causes the reflected/transmitted light to be enriched in far-red (FR) wavelengths and thus the ratio of R/FR light is low. Within very dense canopies, there are further spectral changes involving not just a lowering of R/FR, but also a reduction of blue light and the total light intensity. Two ecotypes of Stellaria longipes, the alpine and the prairie, are of particular interest in the context of shade avoidance. The dwarf alpine ecotype inhabits an area of sparse vegetation. In contrast, the prairie ecotype grows amongst dense vegetation, where it is more subject to being shaded by surrounding plants. Sasidharan et al. (pp. 1557–1569) have demonstrated that although the alpine Stellaria ecotype is nonresponsive to low R/FR (moderate shading), both ecotypes rapidly elongate under deep shade treatments (green shade and low blue light conditions). Of course, shoot elongation depends upon cell wall loosening, so it is of interest to consider which cell wall-loosening enzymes are involved in shade avoidance responses. The authors report that xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase activity was strongly regulated by green shade and low blue light conditions, but not by low R/FR. Expansin activity, on the other hand, was correlated with growth responses to all shading regimens employed, and expansin genes cloned from the internodes of the two ecotypes showed differential regulation in response to the light manipulations. These results indicate that elongation responses to shade involve changes in cell wall extensibility via the transcriptional control of cell wall-loosening enzymes.


The Transcriptome of Trichomes

Trichomes, in their various forms, serve many functions in plants, including protecting plants from insects, reducing water loss through stomata, reflecting excess light, and synthesizing and storing many secondary compounds. One type of trichome in particular, the fibrous trichomes on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seed, is of major importance to the textile industry. Thus, there are many reasons, both basic and applied, why the study of trichomes is of interest. The trichomes of Arabidopsis have been extensively used as a model to address general questions in cell and developmental biology. In this issue, Jakoby et al. (pp. 1583–1602) present gene expression analyses of Arabidopsis trichomes. They have identified 3,231 genes that are up-regulated in mature trichomes relative to leaves without trichomes. They report that cell wall-related transcripts are particularly overrepresented in trichomes. In addition, trichome expression maps revealed high activities of anthocyanin, flavonoid, and glucosinolate pathways, indicative of the roles of trichomes in the biosynthesis of secondary compounds and defense. Arabidopsis trichomes also share many expressed genes with cotton fibers, making them an attractive model to study industrially important fibers. One of the genes that are differentially expressed in cotton fibers is the MYB transcription factor GhMYB25. A combination of transcript profiling and map-based cloning revealed that the NOECK gene of Arabidopsis encodes AtMYB106, a homolog of cotton GhMYB25, and that it acts as a repressor of cell outgrowth in Arabidopsis.


Mitochondria: Dynamic Organelles

Although mitochondria are often portrayed as static, rod-shaped organelles, studies of living cells have demonstrated that they are among the most dynamic of organelles in terms of form and distribution. Changes in their architecture and their ability to translocate rapidly throughout the cytoplasm appear to be of critical importance for executing their cellular functions. In addition, mitochondria constantly undergo fission, fusion, and branching changes. All of these changes can occur within minutes. Plant mitochondria also undergo a great deal of DNA recombination. This implies that before cytokinesis, the different mitochondrial compartments must fuse to allow for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) intermixing. When and how the conditions for mtDNA intermixing are established are largely unknown. The "discontinuous whole" hypothesis postulates that the individual, small mitochondria must transiently fuse to transfer their mtDNA into a common physical space. Seguí-Simarro et al. (pp. 1380–1393) have investigated the cell cycle-dependent changes in mitochondrial architecture in different Arabidopsis cell types using confocal microscopy, conventional, and three-dimensional electron microscopy techniques. Whereas the mitochondria of cells from most plant organs are typically small and dispersed, shoot apical and leaf primordial meristematic cells contain small, discrete mitochondria in the cell periphery and one large, mitochondrial mass in the perinuclear region. During mitosis, approximately 60% of the smaller mitochondria fuse with the large mitochondrion, whose volume increases to 80% of the total mitochondrial volume, and reorganizes into a cage-like structure encompassing first the mitotic spindle and then the entire cytokinetic apparatus. During cytokinesis, the cage-like mitochondrion divides into two independent tentacle-like mitochondria from which new, small mitochondria arise by fission. These cell cycle-dependent changes in mitochondrial architecture shed light on how meristematic cells may achieve such a high rate of mtDNA recombination and ensure the even partitioning of mitochondria between daughter cells.


The Transcriptome of Pollen Germination and Tube Growth

Many dynamic cellular events occur during pollen germination and pollen tube growth, including calcium oscillations, vesicle transport, ion fluxes, cell wall biosynthesis, and cytoskeletal changes. This raises the question of whether transcriptional changes also occur during pollen germination and tube growth. Although it was previously proposed that the mature pollen grains of some plant species may already contain most of the transcripts needed for germination and tube growth, pollen germination and growth in other species is blocked by inhibitors of transcription. Wang et al. (pp. 1201–1211) have examined the changes in the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome during germination and tube growth. They report that the number of expressed genes increased significantly from desiccated mature pollen to hydrated pollen and again to growing pollen tubes—findings consistent with the observation that pollen germination and tube growth are significantly inhibited in vitro by transcriptional inhibition. Overall, transcription is increased during pollen germination and tube growth both in terms of the total number of transcribed genes and the transcriptional levels of some genes. A number of genes were significantly up-regulated, and, more importantly, some new groups of genes were preferentially transcribed during pollen germination and/or pollen tube growth. A gene ontology analysis of these up-regulated genes revealed an emphasis toward cell rescue, transcription, signal transduction, and cellular transport during pollen germination and tube growth. Most of the functional categories correlate well with the known cellular dynamic activities in germinating pollen and/or growing pollen tubes. Members of the CaM/CML (calmodulin/calmodulin-like proteins), CHX (cation/hydrogen exchanger), and Hsp (heat shock protein) gene families, in particular, were markedly up-regulated.


Starch Debranching Enzymes

Synthesis and degradation of the {alpha}-glucan polymers that compose starch granules are of great importance in the physiology of plants. The essential catalytic mechanism for {alpha}-glycoside bond hydrolysis has been conserved broadly in the evolution of the {alpha}-amylase-related superfamily. In the plant kingdom, there are four highly conserved members of this superfamily that catalyze hydrolysis of {alpha}-(1->6) glycoside bonds. Three of these enzymes are similar to the prokaryotic isoamylases and one is closely related to the prokaryotic pullulanases. Collectively, this group of plant enzymes is referred to as starch debranching enzymes (DBEs), and the members are further classified as three isoamylase-type DBEs (ISA1, ISA2, and ISA3) and one pullulanase-type DBE (PU1). Amylopectin catabolism, in particular, is influenced by the activity of DBEs because in this polymer about 5% to 6% of the glycoside bonds are in the "branched" {alpha}-(1->6) configuration. In addition to these expected catabolic functions, genetic analyses of ISA1 and ISA2 mutants have also indicated that both proteins are required for normal starch biosynthesis. In this issue, Wattebled et al. (pp. 1309–1323) have determined the levels of functional redundancy existing between these DBE isoforms by producing and analyzing different combinations of mutations: isa3-1 pu1-1, isa1-1 isa3-1, and isa1-1 isa3-1 pu1-1. The starch content was spectacularly high in isa3-1 pu1-1 double mutants compared to isa3-1 or pu1-1 single mutant, suggesting that the enzymes encoded by isa3-1 and pu1-1 are redundant for the degradation of transitory starch. Combining both isa1-1 and isa3-1 mutations in one single individual reduced starch accumulation to about 2% of the wild type—a 5- to 10-fold reduction in comparison to isa1- or isa2- single mutants. This suggests that isa1-1 and isa3-1 are partially redundant in starch synthesis. Starch almost completely vanished in the triple mutant combination, and no DBE activity was detectable. The results also reveal the dual function of pullulanase since it is partially redundant to ISA3 for degradation and to ISA1 for synthesis. Finally, x-ray diffraction analyses suggest that the crystallinity and the presence of the 9- to 10-nm repetition pattern in starch depend on the collective level of DBE activities.

Peter V. Minorsky

Division of Health Professions and Natural Sciences
Mercy College
Dobbs Ferry, New York 10522

FOOTNOTES

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.900275


Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

Transcriptome Analyses Show Changes in Gene Expression to Accompany Pollen Germination and Tube Growth in Arabidopsis
Yi Wang, Wen-Zheng Zhang, Lian-Fen Song, Jun-Jie Zou, Zhen Su, and Wei-Hua Wu
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1201-1211. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Further Evidence for the Mandatory Nature of Polysaccharide Debranching for the Aggregation of Semicrystalline Starch and for Overlapping Functions of Debranching Enzymes in Arabidopsis Leaves
Fabrice Wattebled, Véronique Planchot, Ying Dong, Nicolas Szydlowski, Bruno Pontoire, Aline Devin, Steven Ball, and Christophe D'Hulst
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1309-1323. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

The Mitochondrial Cycle of Arabidopsis Shoot Apical Meristem and Leaf Primordium Meristematic Cells Is Defined by a Perinuclear Tentaculate/Cage-Like Mitochondrion
José M. Seguí-Simarro, María José Coronado, and L. Andrew Staehelin
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1380-1393. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Root-Secreted Malic Acid Recruits Beneficial Soil Bacteria
Thimmaraju Rudrappa, Kirk J. Czymmek, Paul W. Paré, and Harsh P. Bais
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1547-1556. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

The Regulation of Cell Wall Extensibility during Shade Avoidance: A Study Using Two Contrasting Ecotypes of Stellaria longipes
Rashmi Sasidharan, C.C. Chinnappa, Laurentius A.C.J. Voesenek, and Ronald Pierik
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1557-1569. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Transcriptional Profiling of Mature Arabidopsis Trichomes Reveals That NOECK Encodes the MIXTA-Like Transcriptional Regulator MYB106
Marc J. Jakoby, Doris Falkenhan, Michael T. Mader, Ginger Brininstool, Elisabeth Wischnitzki, Nicole Platz, Andrew Hudson, Martin Hülskamp, John Larkin, and Arp Schnittger
Plant Physiol. 2008 148: 1583-1602. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists