|
|
||||||||
|
First published online September 5, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.126284 Plant Physiology 148:1212-1218 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists Extremely High-Level and Rapid Transient Protein Production in Plants without the Use of Viral Replication1Department of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
Plant-based overexpression of heterologous proteins has attracted much interest and development in recent years. To date, the most efficient vectors have been based on RNA virus-derived replicons. A system based on a disabled version of cowpea mosaic virus RNA-2 has been developed, which overcomes limitations on insert size and introduces biocontainment. This system involves positioning a gene of interest between the 5' leader sequence and 3' untranslated region (UTR) of RNA-2, thereby emulating a presumably stable mRNA for efficient translation. Thus far, the sequence of the 5' UTR has been preserved to maintain the ability of the modified RNA-2 to be replicated by RNA-1. However, high-level expression may be achieved in the absence of RNA-1-derived replication functions using Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation. To investigate those features of the 5' UTR necessary for efficient expression, we have addressed the role of two AUG codons found within the 5' leader sequence upstream of the main initiation start site. Deletion of an in-frame start codon upstream of the main translation initiation site led to a massive increase in foreign protein accumulation. By 6 d postinfiltration, a number of unrelated proteins, including a full-size IgG and a self-assembling virus-like particle, were expressed to >10% and 20% of total extractable protein, respectively. Thus, this system provides an ideal vehicle for high-level expression that does not rely on viral replication of transcripts.
The production of eukaryotic proteins for academic and industrial purposes can present significant challenges in terms of solubility and posttranslational modifications. For this reason, a number of eukaryotic protein production systems have been developed (Aricescu et al., 2006
To date, the most efficient means of achieving high-level transient expression of foreign proteins in plants has involved the use of vectors based on RNA plant viruses (Giritch et al., 2006
To address the issue of biocontainment and to overcome the problem of insert size, we recently developed a system based on a disabled version of CPMV RNA-2 (delRNA-2; Cañizares et al., 2006
Although the AUG at position 512 constitutes the major site of translation initiation on RNA-2 (Holness et al., 1989
Removal of Upstream AUG Codons Greatly Improves GFP Expression Levels in a Transient Assay
To create a useful cloning vector, a derivative of the original delRNA-2 construct containing GFP (1-GFP; Cañizares et al., 2006
Examination of infiltrated tissue under UV light indicated that removal of AUG 115 alone resulted in a decrease in GFP expression to barely detectable levels (Fig. 2A , A115G). By contrast, removal of the in-frame AUG at 161 appeared to result in a dramatic increase in GFP expression levels (Fig. 2A, U162C). A similar enhancement was found when both AUGs at 115 and 161 were removed (Fig. 2A, A115G, U162C). Analysis of protein extracts by SDS-PAGE confirmed these findings and indicated that GFP accumulates to 20% to 25% of the extractable protein when AUG 161 is deleted, whether or not the AUG at 115 is present (Fig. 2B). This high-level expression was confirmed by analysis of the GFP fluorescence extracted from leaves by spectrofluorometry and corresponds to a level approaching 1.2 g/kg GFP of fresh-weight tissue (Fig. 2C). This represents at least a 10-fold increase in the levels obtained when the unmodified 5' leader was used. The spectrofluorometric analysis also revealed that the maximum level of expression, 1.6 g/kg GFP of fresh-weight tissue, is obtained when both AUG 161 and AUG 115 are eliminated.
Increased Expression Levels Are Not Due to Increased mRNA Accumulation To determine whether the increase in protein expression observed after removal of AUG 161 is due to increased levels of mRNA as a result of the mutations in the mutated 5' leaders, quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was performed on RNA extracted from leaf tissue infiltrated with the various constructs. The levels of GFP-specific mRNA did not vary significantly with the nature of the 5' leader sequence used. This lack of variation was found whether or not a construct expressing P19 was coinfiltrated (Fig. 3 ). These results indicate that the enhanced levels of protein expression found when AUG 161 is deleted are not due to enhanced levels of mRNA accumulation, but rather to the mRNA molecules being hypertranslated relative to the wild-type leader. For this reason, we refer to the RNA-2 leader lacking AUG 161 as the hypertranslatable (HT) leader.
The HT Leader Is a General Enhancer of Protein Expression in Plants To examine whether the HT leader is generally effective at increasing expression of heterologous proteins, the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed) and the Hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) were each inserted downstream of either the wild-type or the HT 5' leader. When infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves, the HT-based constructs appeared to cause less necrosis in the infiltrated patches than the wild-type equivalent (Fig. 4A ). Furthermore, infiltration with the DsRed construct gives a reddish hue to the infiltrated leaf patches, suggesting high levels of accumulation of this protein. SDS-PAGE of proteins extracted from infiltrated patches showed that, for both proteins, elimination of AUG 161 led to a substantial increase in accumulation over that obtained with the wild-type leader (Fig. 4B). In each case, the identity of the expressed proteins was confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 4C). DsRed appears to accumulate to similar levels to that of GFP (approximately 25% of the extractable protein; compare Figs. 2B and 4B). The HBcAg accumulates to approximately 1 g/kg of fresh-weight tissue as determined by ELISA using anti-HBcAg antibodies (E. Thuenemann, personal communication), which corresponds to around 20% of the extractable protein. To confirm that the expressed HBcAg was assembly competent, samples of leaf tissue were extracted in 3 volumes of Tris-NaCl buffer and subject to buffer exchange into Tris-EDTA, without concentration, using a 100-kD molecular cutoff column. Transmission electron microscopy of this crude preparation showed the presence of many virus-like particles, which we estimate comprise about 50% of the remaining total protein in the sample (Fig. 4D).
One of the advantages of CPMV expression systems over those based on other viruses is their ability to simultaneously express multiple polypeptides in the same plant cell (Sainsbury et al., 2008a
The results presented here represent the highest reported level of plant-based protein production without the use of viral replication. We report the creation of an expression system based on a version of CPMV RNA-2 that is hypertranslatable relative to the wild-type version. By the removal of an upstream AUG that appears to inhibit translation, the system allows a variety of proteins to be produced to levels similar to that from state-of-the-art viral vectors in a matter of days, and without concomitant shortcomings of viral replication of transcripts. A recent study (Lindbo, 2007
A significant disadvantage of vectors based on monopartite viruses, such as TMV, is their inability to coexpress multiple proteins. This limitation can be overcome by using vectors based on two different viruses that exist synergistically in nature, such as TMV and Potato virus X (Pruss et al., 1997
The question arises as to why deletion of AUG 161 enhances expression from AUG 512. Although translation does occur from AUG 161 on wild-type CPMV RNA-2, the massive increase in expression resulting from the removal of AUG 161 suggests that the presence of AUG 161 is inhibitory to overall translation. A possible mechanism for this is that the majority of ribosomes that do not initiate at AUG 161 are unable to proceed to the downstream AUG 512. If this is the case, it suggests a possible function for the short open reading frame (ORF), which begins at AUG 115 and overlaps AUG 161, in bypassing this start codon. Initiation is known to occur at AUG 115 in vitro (Wellink et al., 1993b
An unexpected benefit of the removal of AUG 161 was that the increase in foreign protein production was accompanied by a reduction in the amount of tissue necrosis previously observed with some constructs (Figs. 4 and 5). Although an N-terminal fusion protein that would theoretically be produced by initiation at AUG 161 has not been detected (Cañizares et al., 2006
The results reported here show that it is possible to express very high levels of foreign proteins in plants without viral replication through the use of a modified version of the CPMV RNA-2 5' leader. CPMV-HT provides a quick, easy, and inexpensive eukaryotic expression system that will prove very useful for the production of large quantities of recombinant proteins. Expression levels are similar to the highest reported so far from systems relying on viral replication. In addition to the biological advantages over viral vectors, such as the absence of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and restrictions on insert size, the use of CPMV-HT does not require a license for work with plant pathogens. Therefore, this system presents an extremely useful and accessible tool in the fields of plant biology and biotechnology.
Plasmid Constructs
A combination of oligonucleotide insertion and site-directed mutagenesis on pM81-FSC1 (Sainsbury et al., 2008b
DsRed (CLONTECH), HBcAg (Mechtcheriakova et al., 2006
Binary plasmid constructs were maintained in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 and agroinfiltration into Nicotiana benthamiana was carried out as follows. Cultures grown to stable phase in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics were pelleted by centrifugation at 2,000g and resuspended in MMA (10 mM MES, pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 µM acetosyringone) to an OD600 of 1.2. After 2- to 4-h incubations at room temperature, CPMV-based expression constructs were coinfiltrated at a 1:1 ratio with pBIN61-P19 (Voinnet et al., 2003
For the extraction of GFP, DsRed, and HBcAg infiltrated leaf tissue was homogenized in 3 volumes of protein extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.25, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% [v/v], Triton X-100). For the extraction of 2G12, infiltrated leaf tissue was homogenized in 3 volumes of phosphate-buffered saline with 5 mM EDTA, 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% Triton X-100). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation and protein concentrations determined by the Bradford assay. The protein concentrations of extracts were consistently 2 to 2.5 mg/mL. Approximately 20 µg of GFP, DsRed, and HBcAg extracts were separated on 12% NuPage gels (Invitrogen) under reducing conditions and approximately 12.5 µg of 2G12 protein extract was separated by Tris-Gly SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. For western blotting, separated extracts were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with Living Colors DsRed monoclonal antibody (CLONTECH) or rabbit anti-HBcAg (AbD Serotec). Anti-mouse or anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used as appropriate (Amersham Biosciences). Signals were generated by chemiluminescence and captured on Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences).
N. benthamiana plants were grown from November to March in greenhouses maintained at 23°C to 25°C with 16 h of supplementary light per day. Infiltrated leaves were photographed with a Nikon D1x digital camera under visible light or, for the detection of GFP, under UV illumination from a Blak-Ray B-100AP UV lamp (Blak-Ray).
GFP fluorescence measurements were made using a protocol modified from Richards et al. (2003)
RNA extractions were performed using Ambion's RNAqueous kit with the plant RNA isolation aid (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentration and quality was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). cDNA was synthesized using the ProtoScript first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (New England BioLabs). RT quantification of target transcripts relative to actin transcripts was revealed by quantitative real-time PCR as measured by a Chromo 4 continuous fluorescence detector coupled to a PTC-200 peltier thermal cycler (MJ research) using SYBR Green JumpStart Taq ready mix (Sigma). Target transcripts were detected with the primers GFP-F, 5'-CTTGACTTCAGCACGTGTCTTGTAGTTCCC-3' and GFP-R, 5'-AGAGGGTGAAGGTGATGCAACATACGG-3'; and actin transcripts were detected with the primers NbActin-F, 5'-CAGAAAGAGGCTACTCTTTTACCACCACGG-3' and NbActin-R, 5'-GTGGTTTCATGAATGCCAGCAGCTTCC-3'. The amplification threshold was set and Ct values were calculated by OpticonMONITOR and Microsoft Excel. Triplicate leaf extracts representing infiltrated tissue from six plants were assayed and relative abundance of GFP RNA was calculated by dividing 0.5Ct-GFP by 0.5Ct-actin.
Antibody concentrations were measured by surface plasmon resonance as described previously using a BIACORE 2000 (Biacore; GE Healthcare; Rademacher et al., 2008
Extraction buffer was exchanged for TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) using a 100-kD molecular mass cutoff column and eluted in the same volume as the initial sample loaded onto the column. Droplets were placed onto carbon-coated electron microscopy grids and left to settle for 60 s. After drawing off excess liquid, grids were negatively stained by placing them upside down onto droplets of 2% uranyl acetate, then washed three times on droplets of water. Imaging was performed using a JEOL 1200 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV.
We would like to thank Markus Sack for help with 2G12 measurements and Kim Findlay for assistance with electron microscopy. Received July 11, 2008; accepted September 2, 2008; published September 5, 2008.
1 This work was supported in part by the European Union FP6 "PharmaPlanta" project, by funding from a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship (grant no. MEST–CT–2004–504273 to F.S.), and by the Trustees of the John Innes Foundation. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: George P. Lomonossoff (george.lomonossoff{at}bbsrc.ac.uk). www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.126284 * Corresponding author; e-mail george.lomonossoff{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
Ahlquist P, Schwartz M, Chen JB, Kushner D, Hao LH, Dye BT (2005) Viral and host determinants of RNA virus vector replication and expression. Vaccine 23: 1784–1787[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Aricescu AR, Assenberg R, Bill RM, Busso D, Chang VT, Davis SJ, Dubrovsky A, Gustafsson L, Hedfalk K, Heinemann U, et al (2006) Eukaryotic expression: developments for structural proteomics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62: 1114–1124[CrossRef][Medline] Buchacher A, Predl R, Strutzenberger K, Steinfellner W, Trkola A, Purtscher M, Gruber G, Tauer C, Steindl F, Jungbauer A, et al (1994) Generation of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 proteins; electrofusion and Epstein-Barr virus transformation for peripheral blood lymphocyte immortalization. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 10: 359–369[Web of Science][Medline] Cañizares MC, Liu L, Perrin Y, Tsakiris E, Lomonossoff GP (2006) A bipartite system for the constitutive and inducible expression of high levels of foreign proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 4: 183–193[CrossRef][Medline] Castro C, Arnold JJ, Cameron CE (2005) Incorporation fidelity of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: a kinetic, thermodynamic and structural perspective. Virus Res 107: 141–149[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gamarnik AV, Andino R (1998) Switch from translation to RNA replication in a positive-stranded RNA virus. Genes Dev 12: 2293–2304 Giritch A, Marillonnet S, Engler C, van Eldik G, Botterman J, Klimyuk V, Gleba Y (2006) Rapid high-yield expression of full-size IgG antibodies in plants coinfected with noncompeting viral vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 14701–14706 Holness CL, Lomonossoff GP, Evans D, Maule AJ (1989) Identification of the initiation codons for translation of cowpea mosaic-virus middle component RNA using site-directed mutagenesis of an infectious cDNA clone. Virology 172: 311–320[Medline] Lindbo JA (2007) TRBO: a high-efficiency tobacco mosaic virus RNA-Based overexpression vector. Plant Physiol 145: 1232–1240 Liu L, Cañizares MC, Monger W, Perrin Y, Tsakiris E, Porta C, Shariat N, Nicholson L, Lomonossoff GP (2005) Cowpea mosaic virus-based systems for the production of antigens and antibodies in plants. Vaccine 23: 1788–1792[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Ma JKC, Drake PMW, Christou P (2003) The production of recombinant pharmaceutical proteins in plants. Nat Rev Genet 4: 794–805[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Mechtcheriakova IA, Eldarov MA, Nicholson L, Shanks M, Skryabin KG, Lomonossoff GP (2006) The use of viral vectors to produce hepatitis B virus core particles in plants. J Virol Methods 131: 10–15[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Morris DR, Geballe AP (2000) Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mRNA translation. Mol Cell Biol 20: 8635–8642 Pruss G, Ge X, Shi XM, Carrington JC, Vance V (1997) Plant viral synergism: the potyviral genome encodes a broad-range pathogenicity enhancer that transactivates replication of heterologous viruses. Plant Cell 9: 859–868 Rademacher T, Sack M, Arcalis E, Stadlmann J, Balzer S, Altmann F, Quendler H, Stiegler G, Kunert R, Fischer R, et al (2008) Recombinant antibody 2G12 produced in maize endosperm efficiently neutralizes HIV-1 and contains predominantly single-GlcNAc N-glycans. Plant Biotechnol J 6: 189–201[CrossRef][Medline] Richards HA, Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Stewart CN Jr (2003) Quantitative GFP fluorescence as an indicator of recombinant protein synthesis in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 22: 117–121[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Rohll JB, Holness CL, Lomonossoff GP, Maule AJ (1993) 3'-Terminal nucleotide sequences important for the accumulation of cowpea mosaic virus M-RNA. Virology 193: 672–679[Medline] Ryabova LA, Pooggin MM, Hohn T (2006) Translation reinitiation and leaky scanning in plant viruses. Virus Res 119: 52–62[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sainsbury F, Cañizares MC, Lomonossoff GP (2007) Cowpea mosaic virus-based expression vectors. In K Hefferon, ed, Virus Expression Vectors. Transworld Research Network, Kerala, India, pp 339–555 Sainsbury F, Lavoie PO, D'Aoust MA, Vezina LP, Lomonossoff GP (2008a) Expression of multiple proteins using full-length and deleted versions of cowpea mosaic virus RNA-2. Plant Biotechnol J 6: 82–92[Medline] Sainsbury F, Liu L, Lomonossoff GP (2008b) Cowpea mosaic virus-based expression of antigens and antibodies in plants. In L Faye, V Gomord, eds, Methods in Biotechnology: Recombinant Pharmaceutical Proteins from Plants. Humana Press, NY (in press) Twyman RM, Stoger E, Schillberg S, Christou P, Fischer R (2003) Molecular farming in plants: host systems and expression technology. Trends Biotechnol 21: 570–578[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] van Bokhoven H, Le Gall O, Kasteel D, Verver J, Wellink J, van Kammen AB (1993) Cis- and trans-acting elements in cowpea mosaic virus RNA replication. Virology 195: 377–386[CrossRef][Medline] van Engelen FA, Molthoff JW, Conner AJ, Nap JP, Pereira A, Stiekema WJ (1995) pBINPLUS: an improved plant transformation vector based on pBIN19. Transgenic Res 4: 288–290[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Voinnet O, Rivas S, Mestre P, Baulcombe D (2003) An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus. Plant J 33: 949–956[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wellink J, van Lent JWM, Verver J, Sijen T, Goldbach RW, van Kammen AB (1993a) The cowpea mosaic virus M RNA-encoded 48-kilodalton protein is responsible for induction of tubular structures in protoplasts. J Virol 67: 3660–3664 Wellink J, Verver J, van Kammen A (1993b) Mutational analysis of AUG codons of Cowpea Mosaic Virus-M RNA. Biochimie 75: 741–747[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Yin J, Li G, Ren X, Herrler G (2007) Select what you need: a comparative evaluation of the advantages and limitations of frequently used expression systems for foreign genes. J Biotechnol 127: 335–347[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|