This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lifschitz, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lifschitz, E. Agricola Articles by Lifschitz, E.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Multiple Regulatory Roles for SELF-PRUNING in the Shoot System of Tomato

Department of Biology, Technion I.I.T.,
Haifa 32000, Israel

In the Scientific Correspondence by Thouet et al. (2008), the authors present several sections of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) apices probed by the SELF-PRUNING (SP) gene and claim that (1) SP is expressed in all nongrowing axillary meristems, not only sympodial meristems, and (2) SP is not expressed at all in all major organ primordia, contrary to what we published (Pnueli et al., 1998). Based solely on this evidence and a selected subset of the available literature, they call for a revision of SP, as a pleiotropic gene promoting growth and thus, among other functions, the cycling of flowering in the sympodium (Pnueli et al., 1998, 2001). Instead, they restrict the function of SP, well as all TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) orthologs, to nongrowing axillary meristems, perhaps for regulation of branching.

The in situ results are indeed different from ours, but in situs of rare transcripts are problematic because slight modifications in the procedures or in plant material may result in inflated differences. We note that the cultivar we used was different from theirs, as divergent are, for example, the Columbia and Landsberg erecta Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotypes. These technical limitations are indeed evident from the order of magnitude differences in their own results (compare their figure 1E with 1B and F or 3A). We agree, however, that SP is expressed in axillary meristems: In Pnueli et al. (1998), we stated, "It is of interest that the SP gene is expressed at a particularly high level in all axillary buds along the shoot even though only some of these buds ultimately give rise to side branches" (p. 1986).

However, in contrast to Thouet et al. (2008), TFL1 orthologs are expressed, as specified below, in many organs in diverse plant species, although, as expected of a regulatory pleiotropic gene, not in all of these organs in every plant species. Also in contrast to what Thouet et al. (2008) said, SP, and other TFL1/CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) homologs function, as cited below, outside of nongrowing axillary meristems.

SP transcripts were detected by PCR in RNA from leaves, flowers, and stems of tomato (Carmel-Goren et al., 2003). TFL1 RNA is found in vegetative and reproductive organs of Arabidopsis (AtGenExpress and see also Sohn et al. [2007]), in leaves and flowers of pea (Pisum sativum; Foucher et al., 2003), and in all organs of rice (Oryza sativa). In rice, TFL1 genes were detected also by in situ in stems, leaf primordia, and vascular strands (Zhang et al. 2005). Thouet et al. (2008) cite evidence that ryegrass (Lolium perenne) TFL1 "also" is expressed exclusively in nongrowing meristems (figure 3 in Jensen et al., 2001). But this evidence, although not noted by Thouet et al., was actually obtained by expressing the pLpTFL1:GUS gene in Arabidopsis, not in ryegrass. In ryegrass, LpTFL1 is expressed in leaves, and thus Jensen et al. (2001) commented, "No GUS expression was detected in the apical meristem or in Arabidopsis leaves, although LpTFL1 is expressed in ryegrass leaves" (p. 1523). Particularly relevant is also the expression of TFL1 genes in stems and all floral organs in citrus (Pillitteri et al., 2004). Finally, an excellent evidence for the expression of SP in leaves was provided by the Louvain-La-Neuve lab (Quinet et al., 2006), who chose to isolate SP cDNA clones from, of all other possible sources, tomato leaf RNA.

Thouet et al. (2008) note, "Such a widespread pattern was unexpected because the sp mutation has no pleiotropic effects on the architecture of the initial segment, leaves, or inflorescences. This curious situation has been stressed by several authors..." (p. 61). However, in every pair of isogenic lines, internodes of sp plants are shorter and this was known and stated in Pnueli et al. (1998). A possible function for a CENL gene in stems elongation was also proposed in Populus (Ruanala et al., 2008). SP interacts with JOINTLESS1 to regulate leafiness in the inflorescence (Rick and Butler, 1956; Szymkowiak and Irish, 2006), and a mutation in the SP gene increases ramification of the inflorescence and fasciation of the flower in response to hormonal treatment (Cordner and Hedger, 1959). And the function of TFL1 is critical for the evolution of inflorescence architecture (Prusinkiewicz et al., 2007). And in contrast to what they say, uf sp plants flower earlier and more extensively than uf alone, as shown by Quinet et al. (2006), table 4. More recently Wang et al. (2008) reported that PPF1 may suppress plant senescence (a character of leaves) via activating TFL1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants.

Axillary and sympodial branching represent two discrete regulatory programs of branching. All types of branching have common elements, but sympodial branching, per definition, depends on the prior termination by a determinate inflorescence in tomato or by seasonal growth cessation in woody sympodial systems. In many backgrounds in tomato, such as in lateral suppressor (Malayer and Guard, 1964) or in single flower truss (sft) plants (Lifschitz and Eshed, 2006), sympodial branching is completely uncoupled from axillary branching. The reference cited by Thouet et al. (2008) to an increased axillary branching in sp plants (Kinet and Peet, 1997) is hard to judge if the numbers, critical distribution of branches, and interactions with known branching genes are missing. In pea, an up-regulated TFL1 ortholog delays flowering and rather induces excessive branching. Overexpression of SP in decapitated tomato or of TFL1 in Arabidopsis (Ratcliffe et al., 1998) does not arrest branching as would be perhaps expected according the revised view of SP function.

Finally, the identification of SFT, a functional antagonist of SP, with florigen (Lifschitz et al., 2006), and the possibility that TFL1 is also mobile (Conti and Bradley, 2007) make discussions of SP more meaningful in the context of florigen. This we attempted in our review (Lifschitz and Eshed, 2006), and a detailed discussion is being prepared for publication.

	FOOTNOTES

 
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.104.900279

lifs{at}tx.technion.ac.il

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP LITERATURE CITED

 
Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D (2003) The SELF PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52: 1215–1222[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Conti L, Bradley D (2007) TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture. Plant Cell 19: 767–778[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cordner HB, Hedger G (1959) Determinateness in the tomato in relation to variety and to application of N-meta-tolylphthalamic acid of high concentration. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 73: 323–330

Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N, Banfield MJ, Rameau C (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15: 2742–2754[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jensen CS, Salchert K, Nielsen KK (2001) A TERMINAL FLOWER1-like gene from perennial ryegrass involved in floral transition and axillary meristem identity. Plant Physiol 125: 1517–1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kinet JM, Peet MM (1997) Tomato. In HC Wien, ed, The Physiology of Vegetable Crops. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 207–258

Lifschitz E, Eshed Y (2006) Universal florigenic signals triggered by FT homologues regulate growth and flowering cycles in perennial day-neutral tomato. J Exp Bot 57: 3405–3414[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lifschitz E, Eviatar T, Rozman A, Shalit A, Goldshmidt A, Amsellem Z, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y (2006) The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6398–6403[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Malayer JC, Guard AT (1964) A comparative developmental study of the mutant sideshootless and normal tomato plants. Am J Bot 51: 140–143[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pillitteri LJ, Lovatt CJ, Walling LL (2004) Isolation and characterization of a TERMINAL FLOWER homolog and its correlation with juvenility in citrus. Plant Physiol 135: 1540–1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979–1989[Abstract]

Pnueli L, Gutfinger T, Hareven D, Ben-Naim O, Ron N, Adir N, Lifschitz E (2001) Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 13: 2687–2702[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Prusinkiewicz P, Erasmus Y, Lane B, Harder LD, Coen E (2007) Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316: 1452–1456[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Quinet M, Dielen V, Batoko H, Boutry M, Havelange A, Kinet JM (2006) Genetic interactions in the control of flowering time and reproductive structure development in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). New Phytol 170: 701–710[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ratcliffe OJ, Bradley DJ, Coen ES (1998) Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development 126: 1109–1120

Rick CM, Butler L (1956) Cytogenetics of the tomato. Adv Genet 8: 267–382[Medline]

Ruanala R, Rinne PLH, Kangasjarvi J, van der Schoot C (2008) CENL1 expression in the rib meristem affects stem elongation and the transition to dormancy in Populus. Plant Cell 20: 59–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sohn EJ, Rojas-Pierce M, Pan S, Carter C, Serrano-Mislata A, Madueño F, Rojo E, Surpin M, Raikhel NV (2007) The shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 is involved in flower development and trafficking to the protein storage vacuole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 18801–18806[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Szymkowiak EJ, Irish EE (2006) JOINTLESS suppresses sympodial identity in inflorescence meristems of tomato. Planta 223: 646–658[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Thouet J, Quinet M, Ormenese S, Kinet JM, Périlleux C (2008) Revisiting the involvement of SELF-PRUNING in the sympodial growth of tomato. Plant Physiol 148: 61–64[Free Full Text]

Wang DY, Li Q, Cui KM, Zhu YX (2008) PPF1 may suppress plant senescence via activating TFL1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. J Integr Plant Biol 50: 475–483

Zhang S, Hu W, Wang L, Lin C, Cong B, Sun C, Luo D (2005) TFL1/CEN-like genes control intercalary meristem activity and phase transition in rice. Plant Sci 168: 1393–1408

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2008 J. Exp. Bot., June 23, 2009; (2009) erp154v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lifschitz, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lifschitz, E. Agricola Articles by Lifschitz, E.