|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 17, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.131508 Plant Physiology 149:1196-1204 (2009) © 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Histone H2B Deubiquitination Is Required for Transcriptional Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS C and for Proper Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis1,[C],[W],[OA]Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (R.J.S., Y.T., M.R.D., R.M.A.); and Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 (X.Z.)
The spectrum of histone modifications at a given locus is a critical determinant for the correct output of gene expression. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), many studies have examined the relationship between histone methylation and gene expression, but few studies exist on the relationship between other covalent histone modifications and gene expression. In this work, we describe the role of histone H2B deubiquitination in the activation of gene expression and the consequence of a perturbation of histone H2B deubiquitination in the timing of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. A mutation in a H2B deubiquitinase, UBIQUITIN-SPECIFIC PROTEASE26 (UBP26), results in an early-flowering phenotype. In the ubp26 mutant, mRNA levels of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and other related family members is decreased. Furthermore, this mutant accumulates H2B monoubiquitination, and has decreased levels of H3K36 trimethylation and increased levels of H3K27 trimethylation at the FLC locus. Thus, UBP26 is required for transcriptional activation of FLC through H2B deubiquitination and is consistent with a model in which deubiquitination is necessary for the accumulation of H3K36 trimethylation and the proper level of transcriptional activation.
Flowering is a highly regulated developmental transition. The perception of both internal and environmental cues ensures that plants transition to flowering during optimal times of the year to maximize their reproductive success. Temperature represents one of the many environmental stimuli that influences flowering. For example, a long exposure to cold, which occurs during winter, enhances the ability to flower in several winter-annual, biennial, or perennial varieties of plants. This acquisition of competence to flower that occurs during a prolonged exposure to cold is known as vernalization (Chouard, 1960
In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the molecular basis of the vernalization requirement has been well studied. There are both annual (no vernalization requirement) and winter-annual (vernalization-responsive) accessions of Arabidopsis. A study of the genetic basis of the winter-annual habit identified a dominant locus, FRIGIDA (FRI), that confers a vernalization requirement (Napp-Zinn, 1979
FLC expression is strongly repressed by vernalization (Michaels and Amasino, 1999
In Arabidopsis, several genes have been identified as transcriptional activators of FLC and some of its related family members (the FLC family members include FLOWERING LOCUS M [FLM]/MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING1 [MAF1] and MAF2–MAF5, and will be collectively referred to as the FLC clade). Among these activators, EARLY FLOWERING7 (ELF7), UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYME1/2 (UBC1/2), HISTONE MONOUBIQUITINATION1/2 (HUB1/2), ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX1 (ATX1), and EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS/SET DOMAIN GROUP8 have crucial roles in modifying histones at the FLC locus (He et al., 2004
In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the Paf1 complex is required for monoubiquitination of histone H2B by the E2 ubiquitin conjugation enzyme Rad6 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Bre1 (Ng et al., 2003
In efs mutants, expression of FLC is strongly reduced. Furthermore, H3K4me3 is reduced around the transcription start site and H3K36me2/3 is decreased at the promoter and at the first intron of FLC (Kim et al., 2005
Yeast employs two different H2B deubiquitinases, one for gene activation and one for gene silencing (Henry et al., 2003
The Arabidopsis genome contains a family of 27 ubiquitin proteases (UBPs; Yan et al., 2000 In this work, we have studied whether UBP26 also functions in transcriptional activation in Arabidopsis similar to the function of Ubp8 in yeast. Examination of the ubp26-1 mutant revealed an early-flowering phenotype due to decreased expression of FLC and other members of the FLC clade. Furthermore, H2Bub1 was found throughout the coding region of FLC in both wild type and the ubp26-1 mutant. The accumulation of H2Bub1 in ubp26-1 mutants did not affect levels of H3K4me3, but it did affect H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in FLC chromatin. Collectively, these observations support a role for UBP26 in transcriptional activation of gene expression through H2B deubiquitination, perhaps via an effect on H3K36me3 and H3K27me3.
The ubp26-1 Mutant Displays an Early-Flowering Phenotype The ubp26-1 mutant (in the C24 accession) contains a T-DNA in the fifth exon of UBP26. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis revealed no expression of the wild-type UBP26 transcript in ubp26-1 plants (Fig. 1, A and B ). ubp26-1 mutants flowered significantly earlier than wild-type C24 in both inductive long days and noninductive short days (Fig. 1, C–E). Consistent with the early-flowering phenotype, the mRNA levels of FLC, MAF2, and MAF3 were quite lower in the ubp26-1 mutant compared to wild type, and the mRNA levels of FLM and MAF4 were also slightly reduced (Fig. 1F). In contrast, the mRNA levels of MAF5 were substantially increased in the ubp26-1 mutant.
In addition to the flowering phenotype, ubp26-1 mutants display a range of other phenotypes such as smaller rosette leaves (Fig. 1, C and D) and weaker apical dominance (only observed after release of secondary inflorescences). To confirm that the ubp26-1 mutation was, in fact, responsible for these phenotypes, we performed complementation experiments. In a subset of the T1 transformant population, all of the ubp26-1 phenotypes were rescued by a transgene containing 2.8 kb of the UBP26 promoter and the entire coding region (Supplemental Fig. S1). Approximately half of the T1 transformants showed severe pleiotropic phenotypes such as multiple vegetative meristems and/or a smaller plant size; these phenotypes were present in both T1 transformants of both the ubp26-1 mutant as well as the wild-type C24 background (Supplemental Fig. S2). Thus, these phenotypes may result from increased UBP26 activity, which indicates that expression of UBP26 in the proper amount and in the appropriate tissues is crucial for normal plant development. Alternatively, these phenotypes could be a result of cosuppression elicited by the transgene.
Many studies of the regulation of the floral transition have been performed in the Columbia (Col) and Landsberg genetic backgrounds. The ubp26-1 allele is in the C24 genetic background. Therefore, we isolated two additional ubp26 mutant alleles in the Col genetic background (ubp26-4 and ubp26-3; Fig. 2A ). However, we were unable to isolate viable plants homozygous for either the ubp26-4 or the ubp26-3 T-DNA allele. We could identify plants hemizygous for the T-DNA, and self-pollination of hemizygous ubp26-4 and/or ubp26-3 plants resulted in an approximately 2:1 ratio of hemizygous:wild type among the progeny. This indicates that the ubp26 lesion results in lethality in the homozygous state and the effect of the mutation is zygotic.
Lethality occurs throughout seed development and occasionally postgermination. Specifically, among the seed derived from self-pollination of plants hemizygous for either ubp26-4 or ubp26-3 we observed a seed abortion rate of approximately 20% (Fig. 2B). Reciprocal crosses between ubp26-4 and wild-type Col demonstrated that the ubp26-4 T-DNA could transmit through either the male or the female gametes. We cleared embryos from seeds produced by plants hemizygous for the ubp26-4 T-DNA to determine if there were specific stages of embryo development that were affected by the ubp26-4 homozygous mutation. From these plants, we observed stochastic arrest throughout embryo development when compared to wild type (Fig. 2, C and D). We were also able to identify seedlings homozygous for ubp26-4 or ubp26-3 (approximately 4%) when segregating populations were sown on nutrient-rich plates, but seedling growth arrested at an early stage, which led to lethality (Fig. 2E). While this work was in progress, Luo et al. (2008)
None of the viable ubp26-4 homozygous mutant plants that we obtained from seed provided by Liu et al. (2008)
UBP26 is a UBP that deubiquitinates H2B, and the ubp26-1 mutant has increased levels of H2Bub1 and can lead to a loss of DNA methylation and heterochromatin formation at transgenes (Sridhar et al., 2007
The accumulation of H2Bub1 in ubp26-1 mutants raised the issue of whether other histone modifications might be affected by a change in the status of H2B ubiquitination. We analyzed histone methylation by immunoblot analysis in the same genotypes mentioned above. Lysine 4 trimethylation of histone 3 (H3K4me3) remained unchanged when compared to the respective wild type (Fig. 3). In addition, no changes in Lys 36 methylation of histone 3 (H3K36me) could be observed except in the efs-3 mutants (Fig. 3). In the efs-3 mutant, a decrease in H3K36me3 and an increase in H3K36me1 were observed (Fig. 3). This is consistent with efs-3 functioning as a H3K36 methyltransferase as proposed by Xu et al. (2008)
H2Bub1 was recently found to accumulate in the transcribed regions of highly expressed genes in humans (Minsky et al., 2008
Mutations in components of the Arabidopsis PAF1 complex severely affect the levels of H3K4me3 at FLC chromatin, although there is no discernable difference in the genome-wide levels of this histone modification (Fig. 3; He et al., 2004
Although FLC mRNA levels are decreased in the ubp26-1 mutant background the H3K4me3 histone modification typically associated with transcription initiation is present around the transcription start site of FLC. Thus, lower FLC mRNA levels in ubp26-1 might be related to a defect in transcription elongation. In yeast, H2B deubiquitination is linked to H3K36 methylation; H3K36me2/3 is enriched near the 3' end of open reading frames in transcribed genes and is involved in proper transcription elongation of a subset of genes (Li et al., 2007
H3K27me3 Is Highly Enriched at FLC Chromatin in ubp26-1 Mutants
Methylation of H3K27 is a hallmark of repressed genes located in euchromatic regions in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2007
The identification of FLC as a central component in establishing the winter-annual habit has led to a greater understanding of gene activation and gene repression in Arabidopsis. Genetic screens aimed at identifying genes required for FLC activation have revealed three major complexes, the PAF1 complex, the SWR1 complex, and the FRI complex (for review, see Schmitz and Amasino, 2007 The collection of mutants in activators of FLC expression permits exploration into the interplay between different histone modifications. Our studies have demonstrated that accumulation of H2Bub1 at FLC chromatin affects H3K36 methylation, and that H3K4 methylation remains unchanged. This is consistent with a model in which H3K4me3 occurs prior to H2B deubiquitination, whereas H3K36me3 occurs afterward. Our work has also helped to better define the hierarchy of molecular functions required for FLC expression. For example, global levels of H2Bub1 were unaffected in efs-3 mutants, although an increase in levels of H3K36me1 was observed at the expense of H3K36me3 in the ubp26-1 mutant (Fig. 5). These data indicate that EFS functions downstream of H2Bub1 in the methylation of H3K36 and the subsequent activation of gene expression. However, there remains much to learn about the hierarchy of histone modifications at FLC and the molecular role of additional regulators of FLC in this hierarchy. The function of UBP26 in H2B deubiquitination and in gene activation in the regulation of FLC is similar to the function of Ubp8 in yeast. Many of the factors that are involved in the transcriptional activation in yeast are also present in the Arabidopsis genome and play essential roles in FLC activation (Fig. 7 ). This and other work demonstrates that the floral transition and the regulation of FLC provide a good model for investigating the mechanisms of epigenetic gene regulation in plants.
The seed abortion phenotype of the ubp26 mutant is much stronger in Col than in the C24 background (Supplemental Fig. S3; Luo et al., 2008
Although the role of Ubp8 and UBP26 in transcriptional activation is similar between yeast and Arabidopsis, there are certain differences, at least at well-studied loci. For example, H3K4me3 and H3K36me2 levels at the FLC locus are almost the same in wild type and in ubp26-1 (Figs. 4C and 5B). In contrast, H3K4me3 levels at the yeast GAL1 locus are higher and H3K36me2 levels are lower in the ubp8 mutant compared to wild type (Henry et al., 2003 One proposed function for H3K36 methylation in the body of transcribed genes in yeast is to suppress the initiation of intragenic transcription initiation. We tested for the presence of cryptic transcripts in the body of FLC by RT-PCR analysis using primers located throughout the FLC locus. However, we did not observe evidence of intragenic transcription, as defined by this assay, in efs or ubp26 mutants. Thus, intragenic transcription in the ubp26-1 mutant may not be as prevalent as it is in yeast.
H3K27me3 is a histone modification that is commonly associated with repressed loci located in euchromatin in Arabidopsis. We observed an enrichment of H3K27me3 in the body of FLC in ubp26-1 mutants compared to C24. Thus, the presence of H3K27me3 may provide a mechanism for repressing genes that accumulate H2Bub1. This observation contrasts with recent work that shows that UBP26 is required for maintaining H3K27me3 and repression of PHERES1 (Luo et al., 2008
In conclusion, there are significant parallels in the activation of gene expression in Arabidopsis and yeast. Additional molecular analyses of genes required for transcriptional activation of FLC in Arabidopsis will further refine our knowledge of the interplay between histone modifications and gene expression in both plants and other eukaryotes.
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The ubp26-1 mutant was isolated from the C24 background (Sridhar et al., 2007
For the growth condition of plants, we followed the methods described in Schmitz et al. (2008)
The UBP26 genomic clone and its 2.8-kb native promoter were amplified by PCR with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's protocol (the termination codon was not included in the amplification). The T9C5 bacterial artificial chromosome vector, obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center, was used as a template for amplification (Choi et al., 1995
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed on 2 µg of RNA using the M-MLV system for RT-PCR (Promega) followed by PCR amplification with ExTaq DNA polymerase (Takara Mirus) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Primers used to amplify the cDNAs and PCR conditions are listed in Supplemental Table S1. PCR products were separated on a 2.5% agarose gel. All RT-PCR results presented are representative data of at least two biological replicates.
Nuclear protein extracts were isolated from a chromatin preparation as described in the ChIP protocol in Gendrel et al. (2005)
Tissue was harvested from seedlings 7 d after germination. Chromatin samples were prepared as described (Gendrel et al., 2005
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
We are grateful to Katsiaryna Frantskevich for technical assistance and to other members of the Amasino Laboratory for helpful discussions. We would like to thank Dr. Jian-Kang Zhu and Dr. Xing-Wang Deng for providing ubp26-1 and ubp26-4 seeds, respectively. Received November 5, 2008; accepted December 7, 2008; published December 17, 2008.
1 This work was supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin (National Institutes of Health grant no. 1R01GM079525 and National Science Foundation grant no. 0209786 [to R.M.A.]).
2 These authors contributed equally to the article.
3 Present address: Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037. The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Richard Mark Amasino (amasino{at}biochem.wisc.edu).
[C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
[OA] Open access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.131508 * Corresponding author; e-mail amasino{at}biochem.wisc.edu.
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657 Bastow R, Mylne JS, Lister C, Lippman Z, Martienssen RA, Dean C (2004) Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 427: 164–167[CrossRef][Medline] Baumbusch LO, Thorstensen T, Krauss V, Fischer A, Naumann K, Assalkhou R, Schulz I, Reuter G, Aalen RB (2001) The Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains at least 29 active genes encoding SET domain proteins that can be assigned to four evolutionarily conserved classes. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 4319–4333 Briggs SD, Bryk M, Strahl BD, Cheung WL, Davie JK, Dent SY, Winston F, Allis CD (2001) Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation is mediated by Set1 and required for cell growth and rDNA silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 15: 3286–3295 Cao Y, Dai Y, Cui S, Ma L (2008) Histone H2B monoubiquitination in the chromatin of FLOWERING LOCUS C regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 2586–2602 Carrozza MJ, Li B, Florens L, Suganuma T, Swanson SK, Lee KK, Shia WJ, Anderson S, Yates J, Washburn MP, et al (2005) Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 123: 581–592[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Choi K, Kim S, Kim SY, Kim M, Hyun Y, Lee H, Choe S, Kim SG, Michaels S, Lee I (2005) SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA3 encodes a nuclear ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN6 required for floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 2647–2660 Choi K, Park C, Lee J, Oh M, Noh B, Lee I (2007) Arabidopsis homologs of components of the SWR1 complex regulate flowering and plant development. Development 134: 1931–1941 Choi S, Creelman RA, Wing RA (1995) Construction and characterization of a bacterial artificial chromosome library of Arabidopsis thaliana. Weeds World 2: 17–20 Chouard P (1960) Vernalization and its relations to dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 11: 191–238[Web of Science] Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U (2003) A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol 133: 462–469 Deal RB, Topp CN, McKinney EC, Meagher RB (2007) Repression of flowering in Arabidopsis requires activation of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression by the histone variant H2AZ. Plant Cell 19: 74–83 Emre NC, Ingvarsdottir K, Wyce A, Wood A, Krogan NJ, Henry KW, Li K, Marmorstein R, Greenblatt JF, Shilatifard A, et al (2005) Maintenance of low histone ubiquitylation by Ubp10 correlates with telomere-proximal Sir2 association and gene silencing. Mol Cell 17: 585–594[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Finnegan EJ, Dennis ES (2007) Vernalization-induced trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 at FLC is not maintained in mitotically quiescent cells. Curr Biol 17: 1978–1983[Web of Science][Medline] Gendall AR, Levy YY, Wilson A, Dean C (2001) The VERNALIZATION 2 gene mediates the epigenetic regulation of vernalization in Arabidopsis. Cell 107: 525–535[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gendrel AV, Lippman Z, Martienssen R, Colot V (2005) Profiling histone modification patterns in plants using genomic tiling microarrays. Nat Methods 2: 213–218[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Greb T, Mylne JS, Crevillen P, Geraldo N, An H, Gendall AR, Dean C (2007) The PHD finger protein VRN5 functions in the epigenetic silencing of Arabidopsis FLC. Curr Biol 17: 73–78[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Gu X, Jiang D, Wang Y, Bachmair A, He Y (2009) Repression of the floral transition via histone H2B monoubiquitination. Plant J (in press) He Y, Doyle MR, Amasino RM (2004) PAF1-complex-mediated histone methylation of FLOWERING LOCUS C chromatin is required for the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18: 2774–2784 Henry KW, Wyce A, Lo WS, Duggan LJ, Emre NC, Kao CF, Pillus L, Shilatifard A, Osley MA, Berger SL (2003) Transcriptional activation via sequential histone H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation, mediated by SAGA-associated Ubp8. Genes Dev 17: 2648–2663 Johanson U, West J, Lister C, Michaels S, Amasino R, Dean C (2000) Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science 290: 344–347 Johnson L, Cao X, Jacobsen S (2002) Interplay between two epigenetic marks: DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol 12: 1360–1367[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Kim S, Choi K, Park C, Hwang HJ, Lee I (2006) SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA4, encoding a C2H2-type zinc finger protein, represses flowering by transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant Cell 18: 2985–2998 Kim SY, He Y, Jacob Y, Noh YS, Michaels S, Amasino R (2005) Establishment of the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis requires a putative histone H3 methyl transferase. Plant Cell 17: 3301–3310 Kim SY, Michaels SD (2006) SUPPRESSOR OF FRI 4 encodes a nuclear-localized protein that is required for delayed flowering in winter-annual Arabidopsis. Development 133: 4699–4707 Koornneef M, Blankestijn-de Vries H, Hanhart CJ, Soppe W, Peeters T (1994) The phenotype of some late-flowering mutants is enhanced by a locus on chromosome 5 that is not effective in the Landsberg erecta wild-type. Plant J 6: 911–919[CrossRef][Web of Science] Lee I, Michaels SD, Masshardt AS, Amasino RM (1994) The late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and mutations in LUMINIDEPENDENS is suppressed in the Landsberg erecta strain of Arabidopsis. Plant J 6: 903–909[CrossRef][Web of Science] Lee JS, Shukla A, Schneider J, Swanson SK, Washburn MP, Florens L, Bhaumik SR, Shilatifard A (2007) Histone crosstalk between H2B monoubiquitination and H3 methylation mediated by COMPASS. Cell 131: 1084–1096[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Li B, Carey M, Workman JL (2007) The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128: 707–719[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Liu Y, Wang F, Zhang H, He H, Ma L, Deng XW (2008) Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis ubiquitin-specific protease gene family reveals specific role and redundancy of individual members in development. Plant J 55: 844–856[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Luo M, Luo MZ, Buzas D, Finnegan J, Helliwell C, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Chaudhury A (2008) UBIQUITIN-SPECIFIC PROTEASE 26 is required for seed development and the repression of PHERES1 in Arabidopsis. Genetics 180: 229–236 March-Diaz R, Garcia-Dominguez M, Florencio FJ, Reyes JC (2007) SEF, a new protein required for flowering repression in Arabidopsis, interacts with PIE1 and ARP6. Plant Physiol 143: 893–901 Martin-Trillo M, Lazaro A, Poethig RS, Gomez-Mena C, Pineiro MA, Martinez-Zapater JM, Jarillo JA (2006) EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 1 (ESD1) encodes ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN 6 (AtARP6), a putative component of chromatin remodelling complexes that positively regulates FLC accumulation in Arabidopsis. Development 133: 1241–1252 Michaels SD, Amasino RM (1999) FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11: 949–956 Michaels SD, Bezerra IC, Amasino RM (2004) FRIGIDA-related genes are required for the winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 3281–3285 Minsky N, Shema E, Field Y, Schuster M, Segal E, Oren M (2008) Monoubiquitinated H2B is associated with the transcribed region of highly expressed genes in human cells. Nat Cell Biol 10: 483–488[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Mylne JS, Barrett L, Tessadori F, Mesnage S, Johnson L, Bernatavichute YV, Jacobsen SE, Fransz P, Dean C (2006) LHP1, the Arabidopsis homologue of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, is required for epigenetic silencing of FLC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 5012–5017 Napp-Zinn K (1979) On the genetical basis of vernalization requirement in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. In P Champagnat, R Jaques, eds, La Physiologie de la Floraison. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, pp 217–220 Ng HH, Dole S, Struhl K (2003) The Rtf1 component of the Paf1 transcriptional elongation complex is required for ubiquitination of histone H2B. J Biol Chem 278: 33625–33628 Noh YS, Amasino RM (2003) PIE1, an ISWI family gene, is required for FLC activation and floral repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 1671–1682 Oh S, Park S, van Nocker S (2008) Genic and global functions for Paf1C in chromatin modification and gene expression in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000077[CrossRef][Medline] Oh S, Zhang H, Ludwig P, van Nocker S (2004) A mechanism related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Paf1c is required for expression of the Arabidopsis FLC/MAF MADS box gene family. Plant Cell 16: 2940–2953 Pien S, Fleury D, Mylne JS, Crevillen P, Inze D, Avramova Z, Dean C, Grossniklaus U (2008) ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX1 dynamically regulates FLOWERING LOCUS C activation via histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation. Plant Cell 20: 580–588 Schmitz RJ, Amasino RM (2007) Vernalization: a model for investigating epigenetics and eukaryotic gene regulation in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1769: 269–275[Medline] Schmitz RJ, Hong L, Michaels S, Amasino RM (2005) FRIGIDA-ESSENTIAL 1 interacts genetically with FRIGIDA and FRIGIDA-LIKE 1 to promote the winter-annual habit of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 132: 5471–5478 Schmitz RJ, Sung S, Amasino RM (2008) Histone arginine methylation is required for vernalization-induced epigenetic silencing of FLC in winter-annual Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 411–416 Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1999) The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11: 445–458 Sheldon CC, Hills MJ, Lister C, Dean C, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ (2008) Resetting of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression after epigenetic repression by vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 2214–2219 Sridhar VV, Kapoor A, Zhang K, Zhu J, Zhou T, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK (2007) Control of DNA methylation and heterochromatic silencing by histone H2B deubiquitination. Nature 447: 735–738[CrossRef][Medline] Sung S, Amasino RM (2004) Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature 427: 159–164[CrossRef][Medline] Sung S, Amasino RM (2006) Molecular genetic studies of the memory of winter. J Exp Bot 57: 3369–3377 Sung S, He Y, Eshoo TW, Tamada Y, Johnson L, Nakahigashi K, Goto K, Jacobsen SE, Amasino RM (2006a) Epigenetic maintenance of the vernalized state in Arabidopsis thaliana requires LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1. Nat Genet 38: 706–710[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Sung S, Schmitz RJ, Amasino RM (2006b) A PHD finger protein involved in both the vernalization and photoperiod pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 20: 3244–3248 Weake VM, Workman JL (2008) Histone ubiquitination: triggering gene activity. Mol Cell 29: 653–663[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] Wellensiek SJ (1962) Dividing cells as the locus for vernalization. Nature 195: 307–308[CrossRef][Web of Science] Wellensiek SJ (1964) Dividing cells as the prerequisite for vernalization. Plant Physiol 39: 832–835 Wood A, Schneider J, Dover J, Johnston M, Shilatifard A (2003) The Paf1 complex is essential for histone monoubiquitination by the Rad6-Bre1 complex, which signals for histone methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p. J Biol Chem 278: 34739–34742 Wood CC, Robertson M, Tanner G, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Helliwell CA (2006) The Arabidopsis thaliana vernalization response requires a polycomb-like protein complex that also includes VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 14631–14636 Xu L, Menard R, Berr A, Fuchs J, Cognat V, Meyer D, Shen WH (2009) The E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, AtUBC1 and AtUBC2, play redundant roles and are involved in activation of FLC expression and repression of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J (in press) Xu L, Zhao Z, Dong A, Soubigou-Taconnat L, Renou JP, Steinmetz A, Shen WH (2008) Di- and tri- but not monomethylation on histone H3 lysine 36 marks active transcription of genes involved in flowering time regulation and other processes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1348–1360 Yan N, Doelling JH, Falbel TG, Durski AM, Vierstra RD (2000) The ubiquitin-specific protease family from Arabidopsis: AtUBP1 and 2 are required for the resistance to the amino acid analog canavanine. Plant Physiol 124: 1828–1843 Zhang X, Clarenz O, Cokus S, Bernatavichute YV, Pellegrini M, Goodrich J, Jacobsen SE (2007) Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol 5: e129[CrossRef][Medline] Zhang Y (2003) Transcriptional regulation by histone ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Genes Dev 17: 2733–2740 Zhao Z, Yu Y, Meyer D, Wu C, Shen WH (2005) Prevention of early flowering by expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C requires methylation of histone H3 K36. Nat Cell Biol 7: 1256–1260[Web of Science][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|