OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data OA All Versions of this Article: 149/2/981    most recent pp.108.132795v2 pp.108.132795v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases GEO DataSet Agricola Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M.

GENETICS, GENOMICS, AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION

Expansion and Diversification of the Populus R2R3-MYB Family of Transcription Factors^1,[W],[OA]

Department of Cell and Systems Biology and Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B2

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
The R2R3-MYB proteins comprise one of the largest families of transcription factors in plants. R2R3-MYB family members regulate plant-specific processes, such as the elaboration of specialized cell types, including xylem, guard cells, trichomes, and root hairs, and the biosynthesis of specialized branches of metabolism, including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. As such, R2R3-MYB family members are hypothesized to contribute to the emergence of evolutionary innovations that have arisen in specific plant lineages. As a first step in determining the role played by R2R3-MYB family members in the emergence of lineage-specific innovations in the genus Populus, the entire Populus trichocarpa R2R3-MYB family was characterized. The Populus R2R3-MYB complement is much larger than that found in other angiosperms with fully sequenced genomes. Phylogenetic analyses, together with chromosome placement, showed that the expansion of the Populus R2R3-MYB family was not only attributable to whole genome duplication but also involved selective expansion of specific R2R3-MYB clades. Expansion of the Populus R2R3-MYB family prominently involved members with expression patterns that suggested a role in specific components of Populus life history, including wood formation and reproductive development. An expandable compendium of microarray-based expression data (PopGenExpress) and associated Web-based tools were developed to better enable within- and between-species comparisons of Populus R2R3-MYB gene expression. This resource, which includes intuitive graphic visualization of gene expression data across multiple tissues, organs, and treatments, is freely available to, and expandable by, scientists wishing to better understand the genome biology of Populus, an ecologically dominant and economically important forest tree genus.

The MYB gene family is at least one billion years old and is represented in genomes in all major eukaryotic lineages (Lipsick, 1996; Rosinski and Atchley, 1998; Kranz et al., 2000). The MYB proteins are named for the v-MYB oncogene, a determinant of avian myeloblastosis that was first discovered in chickens (Lipsick, 1996). MYB proteins are identified on the basis of a highly conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD; Lipsick, 1996). The MYB DBD consists of imperfect repeats of an approximately 50-amino acid region, with each of the repeats giving rise to a helix-helix-loop-helix secondary structure that binds to the major groove of the target DNA sequences (Lipsick, 1996; Stracke et al., 2001). The MYB DBD contains several highly conserved Trp residues, which play a role in sequence-specific binding of DNA (Ogata et al., 1995). In contrast, the region C terminal to the DBD is the activation domain and varies considerably between MYB proteins (Kranz et al., 1998; Jin and Martin, 1999; Stracke et al., 2001; Jiang et al., 2004). This speaks to the wide range of regulatory roles played by members of this family (Kranz et al., 1998; Jin and Martin, 1999; Meissner et al., 1999).

All known animal MYB DBDs consist of three tandem repeats of the MYB motif (designated R1, R2, and R3) and are referred to as 3R-MYB proteins (Rosinski and Atchley, 1998). Plant MYBs may contain three MYB repeats, but more commonly they have only two (R2R3) or one (R1) MYB DBD (Kranz et al., 1998, 2000; Chen et al., 2006). Furthermore, the MYB family is greatly expanded in plant genomes relative to animal genomes (Stracke et al., 2001). In all known vertebrate genomes, there are three different 3R-MYB proteins: c-MYB, A-MYB, and B-MYB (Lipsick, 1996; Rosinski and Atchley, 1998). In contrast, in the Arabidopsis genome, there are five 3R-MYB genes and 126 R2R3-MYB genes (Stracke et al., 2001; Durbarry et al., 2005), while in rice (Oryza sativa), there are 84 R2R3-MYB genes (Jiang et al., 2004).

This expansion of the R2R3-MYB family in plants supports the observation that many R2R3-MYB transcription factors play roles in plant-specific processes. For example, the elaboration of specific epidermal cell types, including trichomes (Oppenheimer et al., 1991; Higginson et al., 2003), root hairs (Wada et al., 1997; Tominaga et al., 2007), and petal epidermis (Perez-Rodriguez et al., 2005; Baumann et al., 2007), is contingent on the activity of R2R3-MYB transcription factors. R2R3-MYB family members also play central roles in the control of plant metabolism, notably regulation of the synthesis of specific classes of phenylpropanoids, such as flavonoids (Mehrtens et al., 2005; Stracke et al., 2007), anthocyanin (Teng et al., 2005; Deluc et al., 2006), and lignins (Patzlaff et al., 2003; Goicoechea et al., 2005; Bedon et al., 2007). R2R3-MYB family members have demonstrated roles in regulating plant responses to phytohormonal cues, including abscisic acid (Abe et al., 1997, 2003) and gibberellin (Gocal et al., 2001), and to environmental signals, such as light (Jin et al., 2000; Hartmann et al., 2005) and water availability (Urao et al., 1996; Jung et al., 2008).

Given the multiplicity of plant-specific processes controlled by R2R3-MYB transcription factors, it has been postulated that the elaboration of the R2R3-MYB family may account for some of the evolutionary innovations that contribute to plant diversity (Riechmann et al., 2000). In Arabidopsis, members of the R2R3-MYB family of transcription factors have been identified, and their targets and expression patterns are being characterized (Kranz et al., 1998; Meissner et al., 1999; Stracke et al., 2001). However, Arabidopsis is an herbaceous, annual plant that is not representative of a large number of important plant species, particularly long-lived woody perennial plants, like forest trees. Trees are distinct from herbaceous species in many ways: they have a self-supporting structure, the secondary growth or wood, and they have a much longer lifespan (Bradshaw et al., 2000; Brunner et al., 2004). The regulatory networks and molecular mechanisms that underlie these unique properties cannot be investigated through the examination of nontree species, thus demonstrating the importance and opportunity presented by the recent publication of the complete genome sequences for two wood-forming species: Populus trichocarpa (Tuskan et al., 2006) and Vitis vinifera (Velasco et al., 2007).

Molecular evidence suggests that P. trichocarpa and Arabidopsis shared their last common ancestor some 100 to 120 million years ago (Tuskan et al., 2006). Since then, Arabidopsis and P. trichocarpa have evolved different life histories, including herbaceous versus arboreal development, annual versus perennial habit, and selfing versus outcrossing mating strategies. In both plants and animals, the evolution of such diversity has been hypothesized to be the consequence of changes in the expression pattern of the genes encoding transcription factors and/or changes in the functions of the transcription factors themselves (Doebley and Lukens, 1998; Weatherbee et al., 1998). The elaboration of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor family is postulated to account for some of the evolutionary innovations that contribute to plant diversity (Jin and Martin, 1999). Here, we explore the contribution of R2R3-MYB proteins in the diversification of plant form and function through an analysis of the entire R2R3-MYB family encoded in the Populus genome.

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 

The Populus R2R3-MYB Family Is Larger Than That of Other Sequenced Dicotyledonous Angiosperms

The Populus R2R3-MYB family was compared with the corresponding families from the woody perennial Vitis vinifera, which is a sister taxon to Populus in Eurosids I, and the more distantly related Arabidopsis, which is a member of Eurosids II. The predicted R2 and R3 MYB repeats of the MYB DBD are highly conserved across plant lineages (Jin and Martin, 1999). Using the conserved N-terminal DBD as the defining feature, 192 genes in the P. trichocarpa genome were annotated as encoding R2R3-MYB proteins and five genes were annotated as encoding 3R-MYB proteins (Table I ; Supplemental Table S1). Like their counterparts in other plant species, the R2 and R3 MYB repeats of the P. trichocarpa R2R3-MYB family contain characteristic amino acids, including a series of evenly distributed and highly conserved Trp residues that play a role in sequence-specific binding of DNA (Ogata et al., 1995; Stracke et al., 2001; Fig. 1 ). In keeping with this, the phylogeny constructed with all predicted Populus 3R-MYB and R2R3-MYB proteins, plus all Arabidopsis and V. vinifera family members (Fig. 2 ), is highly similar to a previously published phylogeny that included all known Arabidopsis and rice R2R3-MYB proteins (Jiang et al., 2004). Most of the subgroups described in this previously published phylogeny, defined on the basis of their Arabidopsis complement, are maintained in the current phylogeny, with most subgroups merely expanding to include both Populus and Vitis R2R3-MYB members (Supplemental Table S2).

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 1. The R2 and R3 MYB repeats are highly conserved across all R2R3-MYB proteins in the P. trichocarpa genome. The sequence logos of the R2 (A) and R3 (B) MYB repeats are based on full-length alignments of all PtrR2R3-MYB proteins. The bit score indicates the information content for each position in the sequence. Highly conserved Trp residues required for DNA binding are highlighted in red. PtrMYB proteins in clade 27 have an additional four amino acids directly before the first conserved Trp in R3 (Supplemental Fig. S2A).

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships and subgroup designations in MYB proteins from P. trichocarpa (Ptr), V. vinifera (Vv), and Arabidopsis (At). The neighbor-joining tree includes 192 R2R3-MYB proteins from Populus, 118 from Vitis, 126 from Arabidopsis, and a further 54 from other plant species, in addition to five 3R-MYB proteins from each of Populus, Vitis, and Arabidopsis. The proteins are clustered into 49 subgroups (triangles), designated with a subgroup number (e.g. C1). Eleven proteins did not fit well into clusters (lines). Some landmark R2R3-MYB proteins are listed to the right of the clades for reference. The membership of each subgroup is described in the table at right. Several clades are highlighted that exemplify lineage-specific R2R3-MYB gene expansion. C3 and C25 (green) show dramatic expansion in the P. trichocarpa lineage. C13 and C37 (yellow) do not include any PtrMYB proteins. C14 and C22 (blue) show limited expansion in the P. trichocarpa lineage. Many clades do not include any Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins (orange). The uncompressed tree with full taxa names is available as Supplemental Figure S1.

Expansion of the Populus R2R3-MYB Family Has Occurred through Multiple Mechanisms and Resulted in Lineage-Specific Differences in R2R3-MYB Clades

Evidence of the salicoid-specific whole genome duplication event in the Populus lineage (approximately 65 million years ago) is present throughout the P. trichocarpa genome (Tuskan et al., 2006). Consistent with this, many predicted MYB-encoding genes have paralogous counterparts in syntenic regions of related LGs. For example, large sections of LG_II and LG_V are thought to be the product of the salicoid-specific genome duplication (Tuskan et al., 2006). In keeping with this, three predicted MYB genes on LG_II (PtrMYB109, PtrMYB189, and PtrMYB220) show conserved organization with three highly similar MYB genes on LG_V (PtrMYB030, PtrMYB158, and PtrMYB190). Many similar examples exist throughout the Populus MYB gene family (Fig. 3 ); however, whole genome duplication can only explain some of the R2R3-MYB gene family expansion observed.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 3. R2R3-MYB and 3R-MYB proteins are present on all LG in the P. trichocarpa genome. One hundred seventy-two of the Populus R2R3-MYB genes are mapped to LG according to Joint Genome Institute Poplar Genome version 1.1. Each vertical bar represents one LG drawn to scale. The identities of the MYB genes are indicated to the right of the LG on which they are located, with horizontal lines intersecting with the LG indicating their positions. In cases in which multiple MYB genes are located in close proximity on a LG, lines connecting individual gene names and the LG have been omitted. In these cases, angled lines have been used to bracket the relevant gene names and to display their genomic locations. The colored boxes indicate groups of MYB proteins with paralogous and syntenic genes on two LG. The groups indicated are not exhaustive but serve to indicate the widespread evidence of the salicoid-specific whole genome duplication event in the P. trichocarpa genome.

While the number of R2R3-MYB-encoding genes has expanded in Populus, the number of 3R-MYB genes has not. That is, Arabidopsis (Stracke et al., 2001), V. vinifera, and P. trichocarpa genomes all encode only five 3R-MYB proteins, despite the fact that they encode a widely varying number of R2R3-MYB proteins: 125, 123, and 192, respectively (Supplemental Tables S1, S3, and S4). The 3R-MYB gene typifies the vertebrate MYB family (Lipsick, 1996) and is present in all major plant lineages (Kranz et al., 2000; Ito, 2005; Haga et al., 2007), suggesting that 3R-MYB genes represent an ancient and evolutionarily conserved gene family. In both plants and vertebrates, 3R-MYB proteins regulate progress through cell cycle transition (Ito et al., 2001; Okada et al., 2002; Ito, 2005; Haga et al., 2007). Although there appears to be partially redundant function within this family of genes in Arabidopsis, loss-of-function mutations in 3R-MYB genes have been demonstrated to lead to incomplete cytokinesis (Haga et al., 2007). This suggests that 3R-MYB proteins fulfill a number of core cellular functions that are conserved across evolution, while the larger, more diverse family of R2R3-MYB proteins in plants suggests that they may play a role in generating phenotypic diversity within this kingdom.

Phylogenetic analysis of the predicted R2R3-MYB protein sequences revealed that there was not equal representation of Populus, Vitis, and Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins within given clades (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. S1). For example, phylogeny subgroup C25, which includes only one Arabidopsis MYB protein and two Vitis MYB proteins, includes seven Populus R2R3-MYB proteins. By contrast, the C13 subgroup includes six Arabidopsis and two Vitis MYB proteins but not one predicted Populus MYB protein. In other cases, such as subgroup C22, there are fewer Populus MYB proteins than expected, given the whole genome duplication event (five Arabidopsis, three P. trichocarpa, three V. vinifera). These findings lend support to the model of gene loss in the Populus lineage or gene duplication in the Arabidopsis lineage following divergence from the last common ancestor.

Remarkably, several clades do not include any Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins but only members from Populus and Vitis (Fig. 2). This suggests that the genes in these clades may have specialized roles that were either lost in Arabidopsis or acquired in the Populus and Vitis lineages after divergence from the last common ancestor with Arabidopsis. It remains to be determined whether the absence of Arabidopsis genes in these clades extends to other members of Eurosids II or whether it is something particular to the Arabidopsis genome.

PopGenExpress, an Affymetrix Microarray-Based Compendium of Populus Transcript Abundance, Provides Insights into R2R3-MYB Gene Expression and Diversification

Affymetrix Poplar Genome Arrays were used to assess the transcript abundance of 180 R2R3-MYB-encoding genes (Supplemental Table S1). There were no probe sets on the array corresponding to the remaining R2R3-MYB-encoding transcripts. Transcript abundance for the R2R3-MYB-encoding genes was assessed in biological triplicate RNA samples extracted from seedlings grown under different light regimes, young leaves, mature leaves, roots, xylem, female catkins, and male catkins. The compendium of data derived from these experiments is referred to as the Populus Gene Expression (PopGenExpress) data set.

As is commonly the case for genes encoding transcription factors, many of the P. trichocarpa R2R3-MYB-encoding genes had low transcript abundance levels, as determined by the Affymetrix microarray analysis. Nevertheless, distinct transcript abundance patterns were readily identifiable in the PopGenExpress data set for all 180 of the R2R3-MYB probe sets on the microarray. Groups of MYB-encoding genes showed preferential accumulation of transcripts in a given organ or tissue or under a specific condition (Fig. 4 ). In fact, the majority (75%) of Populus R2R3-MYB-encoding genes exhibited transcript abundance profiles that had marked peaks in transcript abundance in only one distinct condition in the current PopGenExpress data set. This suggests that R2R3-MYB proteins function as regulators of processes that are limited to discrete cells, organs, or conditions.

View larger version (86K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 4. Populus R2R3-MYB genes exhibit differential expression across a range of tissues, organs, and treatments. The patterns of relative transcript accumulation of each of 180 R2R3-MYB genes and five 3R-MYB genes as determined by microarray analysis are presented as a heat map, with red indicating higher levels and green indicating lower levels of transcript accumulation. Each column represents a discreet biological sample, and all treatments are presented as biological triplicates. CL, Seedlings grown in continuous light; DL, seedlings grown in continuous darkness and then transferred to light for 3 h; CD, seedlings grown in continuous darkness; YL, young leaf; ML, mature leaf; R, root; DX, differentiating xylem; FC, female catkins; MC, male catkins. Data are normalized within each row.

Strikingly, seven of the Populus MYB family members with the most abundant expression in roots encode proteins in a clade with members of the Blind subfamily of R2R3-MYB proteins (C1). Blind was originally identified on the basis of its role in affecting plant aerial architecture by controlling axillary branch formation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Schmitz et al., 2002). Blind-related proteins in Arabidopsis have demonstrated roles in the regulation of axillary meristems (AtMYB37, AtMYB38, and AtMYB84; Keller et al., 2006; Muller et al., 2006) and in root development (AtMYB68; Feng et al., 2004). It may be that the Blind-related proteins that are expressed in Populus roots play a similar role in shaping root architecture. Similarly, it is possible that some of the Blind-related genes in P. trichocarpa may exhibit transcript accumulation in axillary buds and meristems. The continued expansion of the PopGenExpress data set will allow for testing of such hypotheses.

Approximately 28% (50 of 180) of the Populus R2R3-MYB-encoding genes had the highest transcript abundance in catkins. Twenty-nine of these 50 genes (58%) showed the highest transcript accumulation in male catkins, seven (14%) had the highest accumulation in female catkins, and the remaining 14 (28%) had approximately equal transcript accumulation in male and female catkins. The genes showing the highest transcript accumulation in both male and female catkins represent the largest group of R2R3-MYB transcripts that accumulate in more than one condition in this data set.

Twelve of the R2R2-MYB-encoding genes with the highest transcript accumulation in flowers fell into four clades (C11, C19, C38, and C39) that contained Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB family members with known roles in plant reproductive biology. These included Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB family members implicated in anther development (AtMBY21 [Shin et al., 2002], AtMYB24 [Yang et al., 2007], AtMYB33 [Gocal et al., 2001], AtMYB65 [Gocal et al., 2001], and AtMYB103 [Zhang et al., 2007]), pollen tube guidance and synergid formation (AtMYB98; Kasahara et al., 2005), and sperm cell formation (AtMYB125; Durbarry et al., 2005). The Populus counterparts of these MYB family members, which share both high sequence similarity and expression profiles, are good candidates for future studies aimed at developing a better mechanistic understanding of floral development in Populus. Characterization of these family members would be an ideal starting point in the dissection of sex determination in the dioecious Populus lineage.

In addition to groups of genes that had similar transcript abundance profiles but were relatively phylogenetically distinct, several phylogenetic clades were characterized by having members that largely shared the same transcript abundance profile. Similar transcript abundance patterns were observed even between Arabidopsis and Populus members of the clade. Prominent among these clades were those that included R2R3-MYB-encoding genes related to those previously implicated in the regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism.

Populus R2R3-MYB Proteins Related to Those Implicated in the Regulation of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism Tend to Share Transcript Abundance Profiles

Many R2R3-MYB proteins modulate the expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in various facets of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Phenylpropanoid metabolism generates a vast array of compounds that are important for a diversity of plant functions, including resistance to herbivore and pathogen attacks (Peters and Constabel, 2002; Miranda et al., 2007), and for the construction of structural components of the plant body (Boerjan et al., 2003; Deluc et al., 2006). Phenylpropanoid metabolism is particularly important in tree species, which make use of phenylpropanoid-derived metabolites to elaborate a diversity of soluble defense compounds as well as insoluble tannins that function as a durable resistance against herbivores and pathogens (Peters and Constabel, 2002). Moreover, trees like Populus have a woody stem composed of up to 30% phenylpropanoid-derived lignins, which provide structural integrity, water transport capacity, and defense against degradation for this key portion of the tree body. In keeping with the importance of maintaining a diverse and robust phenylpropanoid metabolism in trees, genes encoding enzymes of phenylpropanoid metabolism are overrepresented in the Populus genome relative to the Arabidopsis genome (Tuskan et al., 2006). On the basis of the analysis of Populus genes predicted to encode R2R3-MYB proteins, the trend in diversifying genes encoding enzymes in the phenylpropanpoid pathway also seems to extend to genes encoding regulators of this pathway.

Many of the R2R3-MYB proteins implicated in the control of phenylpropanoid metabolism group into specific clades on the basis of the facet of phenylpropanoid metabolism they regulate. For example, clade 10 includes R2R3-MYB family members implicated in the regulation of genes encoding lignin biosynthetic enzymes (Fig. 5A ). This clade includes Pinus taeda MYB4, which is expressed in cells undergoing lignification and alters the accumulation of transcripts corresponding to genes encoding lignin biosynthetic enzymes (Patzlaff et al., 2003). Other members of this clade have been shown to function in an almost identical fashion, with expression in differentiating xylem cells and capacity to alter lignin biosynthesis. These include AtMYB46 (Zhong et al., 2007), Eucalyptus gunnii MYB2 (Goicoechea et al., 2005), and Picea glauca MYB4 (Bedon et al., 2007).

View larger version (47K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 5. PtrR2R3-MYB genes show conserved patterns of transcript accumulation across tissues. A, Clade 10 includes R2R3-MYB genes isolated from the wood-forming tissues of a number of species, including P. glauca (Pg), P. taeda (Pt), E. gunnii (Eg), V. vinifera (Vv), and Arabidopsis (At) as well as four previously uncharacterized R2R3-MYB genes from P. trichocarpa (Ptr). B, The relative transcript accumulation of each of the PtrR2R3-MYB genes in clade 10 as determined by microarray analysis. C, Clade 27 includes several well-known R3R3-MYB genes with demonstrated roles in anthocyanin biosynthesis in a variety of organisms, including AtPAP1/MYB75, AtPAP2/MYB90, and P. hybrida ANTHOCYANIN2 (PhAN2) as well as six previously uncharacterized PtrR2R3-MYB genes. D, The relative transcript accumulation of each of the PtrR2R3-MYB genes in clade 27 as determined by microarray analysis. The scale bars under the trees represent 0.2 substitutions. The heat maps are clustered by Pearson correlation coefficient. Red indicates higher levels and green represents lower levels of transcript accumulation. CL, Seedlings grown in continuous light; DL, seedlings grown in continuous darkness and then transferred to light for 3 h; CD, seedlings grown in continuous darkness; YL, young leaf; ML, mature leaf; R, root; DX, differentiating xylem; FC, female catkins; MC, male catkins.

R2R3-MYB proteins are also well known regulators of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruit, flowers, and leaves. PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT (PAP) proteins, AtMYB75/PAP1 and AtMYB90/PAP2, are two of the best characterized Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins involved in this process. AtMYB75/PAP1 is essential for both Suc-induced (Teng et al., 2005) and light-induced (Cominelli et al., 2008) anthocyanin accumulation. These genes form a clade (clade 27) that also includes AtMYB113 and AtMYB114, which regulate late steps in anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Gonzalez et al., 2008), and Petunia x hybrida ANTHOCYANIN2, which regulates anthocyanin in flowers (Quattrocchio et al., 1999; Fig. 5C). Six Populus R2R3-MYB proteins grouped with this clade. Four of the genes encoding these proteins, PtrMYB116, PtrMYB117, PtrMYB118, and PtrMYB119, all had high levels of transcript accumulation in the male catkins (Fig. 5D). The male catkins of Populus are characteristically a deep red color attributable to the abundance of anthocyanin-rich pollen grains. Anthocyanin pigments provide protection against damaging levels of UV radiation (Cominelli et al., 2008) and also function as precursors to conjugates that protect against pathogens and herbivory (Peters and Constabel, 2002). The apparently redundant activity of four R2R3-MYB genes in male catkins underlines the importance of regulating the biosynthesis of these protectants in reproductive tissue. PtrMYB120 has the highest level of transcript accumulation in seedlings grown in continuous darkness and then moved into the light for 3 h; therefore, it may play a role in evoking anthocyanin biosynthesis in vegetative tissues to protect them from the deleterious effects of UV light (Fig. 5D). PtrMYB113 shows low transcript accumulation throughout the tissues and organs examined and may function to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in response to a stimulus that was not included in this study.

The genes encoding the proteins in the clade implicated in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis have a distinctive arrangement in the Arabidopsis, V. vinifera, and P. trichocarpa genomes. In all three organisms, the genes are present as tandem duplications that appear to have arisen since they last shared a common ancestor (Fig. 5C; Supplemental Fig. S1). Notably, the R3 MYB repeat in P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera R2R3-MYB proteins in this clade is modified relative to the corresponding motif in the Arabidopsis and P. hybrida proteins. This modification takes the form of a four-amino acid addition (QVk/qM) directly preceding the first conserved Trp in the R3 repeat (Supplemental Fig. S2A). These additional amino acids are encoded by sequences present at the 3' end of the second exon. Based on an alignment of the predicted mRNA molecules for the Arabidopsis, V. vinifera, and P. trichocarpa genes in this clade, it does not appear that there has been an error in splice site prediction (Supplemental Fig. S2B). That is, the additional amino acids in the Populus R3 domain appear to be bona fide components of the motif. Given the role of this motif in protein-DNA interactions, the additional four amino acids in the Populus proteins could affect DNA binding. The fact that this motif is present in all six of the Populus members of the clade suggests that they are likely to bind to similar targets, but it remains to be determined if their binding specificity or selectivity differs from that of their Arabidopsis counterparts. Future studies could examine this possibility and use it as the basis to explore the coevolution of DNA-binding domains relative to their cognate cis-acting DNA binding sites.

The high degree of redundancy within those clades in which genes share highly similar transcript abundance profiles is consistent with the hypothesis that subfunctionalization has occurred, with individual family members assuming nonredundant functions in the same tissue. In some cases, subfunctionalization may have resulted in one of the MYB proteins acting as an activator of gene expression and another acting as a repressor. Coexpression of such antagonistic pairs of MYB proteins can produce a "gearing mechanism" in which the regulation of shared target genes is a function of the relative abundance of a strong activator relative to a weaker one (Moyano et al., 1996). Alternatively, the high degree of redundancy within such clades may reflect the fact that there has not been adequate time for selection to purge one of the paralogs. It must be noted that genetic distance between paralogous pairs of R2R3-MYB genes was not a good predictor of the Pearson correlation coefficient describing their expression profiles (Supplemental Fig. S3). Namely, paralogous pairs separated by shorter genetic distances were no more likely to be coexpressed than were pairs separated by longer genetic distances.

The Populus Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph Browser Facilitates Rapid Hypothesis Testing Related to MYB Expression

Identification of Populus R2R3-MYB genes with transcript abundance patterns or gene products that are phylogenetically close to MYB proteins with known function from other species provides candidates for future studies aimed at thoroughly dissecting MYB function. Such studies would benefit from tools that enabled more intuitive representations of transcript abundance patterns from the PopGenExpress compendium, so that rapid comparisons could be made with putative orthologs from better characterized species such as Arabidopsis. To enable community-wide, simple, graphical representation of PopGenExpress transcript abundance data, a Web-based tool was devised, the Populus Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph (eFP) browser (Fig. 6 ; http://www.bar.utoronto.ca/efppop/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi). The Populus eFP browser is based on eFP tools for Arabidopsis and Mus musculus (Winter et al., 2007). For the Populus eFP browser, diagrams of poplar tissues, organs, or growth conditions are shaded, with colors corresponding to the quantity of transcript for a given gene under that condition.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 6. eFP display of transcript accumulation patterns across a variety of Populus organs and treatments. Poplar eFP browser presents the transcript accumulation pattern of PtrMYB025 in a variety of tissues and organs. In all cases, red indicates higher levels of transcript accumulation and yellow indicates a lower level of transcript accumulation.

	CONCLUSION

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Detailed annotation and phylogenetic analysis of the entire complement of P. trichocarpa R2R3-MYB genes and their protein products reveal the striking diversification that has occurred in this gene family in Populus. Some of this diversification is attributable to genome duplication, but unequal expansion in particular clades and the manifestation of entire clades lacking Arabidopsis family members suggest that some of the diversification in Populus R2R3-MYB family members may contribute to lineage-specific phenotypic innovations. Here, we have identified some of the family members that may contribute to these innovations, through an examination of both the R2R3-MYB phylogeny and patterns of transcript abundance. These genes will form the basis for future hypothesis tests involving gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies aimed at clarifying their roles in Populus growth, development, and survival.

We also provide a collection of data and an associated bioinformatics tool that enable the research community to examine, visualize, and formulate hypotheses based on transcript abundance of R2R3-MYB-encoding genes or, indeed, any other gene in Populus that is represented on the Affymetrix Poplar GeneChip. By precomputing Arabidopsis-Populus orthologs, we also enable easy cross-species expression viewing to identify the true functional ortholog in Populus of a given Arabidopsis gene, if it exists. The gene expression database is expandable and will acquire greater value as other researchers add their GeneChip data to the core compendium we have established. This will add greatly to the expanding toolbox available to characterize the molecular mechanisms underpinning the basic biology of an ecologically dominant and economically important tree genus.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 

Plant Material

Plant material was collected from clonally propagated, 8-week-old Populus balsamifera saplings (clone 1006; Alberta Pacific Forest Industries) grown in a climate-controlled growth chamber (mature leaf, young leaf, root, differentiating xylem), or from P. balsamifera seeds (etiolated light and dark seedlings; seed lot no. 20071015; National Tree Seed Centre), or from mature P. balsamifera trees grown by Alberta Pacific Forest Industries in a field trial in Grassland, Alberta, Canada (male and female catkins). Trees established in the growth chamber were grown in Sunshine Mix (Sun Gro Horticulture) with a 16-h photoperiod, a maximum daytime temperature of 22°C, and a minimum nighttime temperature of 17°C. All tissues were collected 8 h into the light phase during a 16-h/8-h light/dark cycle , except for the midnight samples, which were collected at 4 h after the shift from light to dark in the same cycle. All tissues were collected from saplings without water limitations. For the comparison of dark-grown seedlings versus those grown in the dark and then exposed to light for 3 h, seeds were germinated in the dark in a growth chamber on wetted filter paper on petri plates with a constant temperature of 21°C for 5 d. On the 6th d, half of the plates were exposed to light (150 µmol) for 3 h. At this time, seedlings were collected from plates exposed to light and from plates in continuous darkness. All collected plant materials were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen upon harvesting and stored at –80°C until RNA was extracted. Each sample comprised pooled material from three individuals, except for the seedling samples, which comprised pooled material from 20 individuals. Mature leaf samples comprised the first fully expanded leaf of three saplings, including the petiole. Young leaf samples included the first leaf, with its petiole, that was completely uncurled but was still shiny and much smaller than the mature leaves. Root samples included the distal 15 cm of well-rinsed root mass. Differentiating xylem was collected from the bottom 6 inches of the stem by peeling off the bark and immediately scraping the surface of the exposed wood into microcollection tubes containing liquid nitrogen. Seedlings were grown for 5 d in the dark; on the 6th d, half of the seedlings were transferred to the light and samples (comprising entire seedlings) were collected at 30 min after transfer to light. Male and female catkins were collected on April 30, 2007.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) R2R3- and 3R-MYB gene identifiers were obtained from Stracke et al. (2001), and the corresponding protein sequences were downloaded from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (http://Arabidopsis.org; Rhee et al., 2003; Supplemental Table S3). Different identifiers have been used for AtMYB8 (At1g35515), AtMYB39 (At4g17785), and AtMYB118 (At3g27785) in this work than by Stracke et al. (2001).

Gene identifiers for 94 Vitis vinifera R2R3-MYB genes were obtained from Matus et al. (2008), and the corresponding protein sequences were downloaded from the International Grape Genome Program's (IGGP) Web site (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/English/Projets/Projet_ML/projet.html). It is important to note that while Matus et al. (2008) identified 108 putative R2R3-MYB-encoding genes, careful scrutiny of the coding sequences revealed that 15 of these genes actually represent single-repeat MYB proteins and so were excluded from the analysis described here. An additional 25 R2R3- and five 3R-MYB genes were identified on the International Grape Genome Program's Web site using the search terms "R2R3" and "MYB transcription factor" (Supplemental Table S4).

Populus trichocarpa MYB gene models were retrieved from the Joint Genome Institute P. trichocarpa version 1.1 Web site (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html). Putative MYB genes in the P. trichocarpa genome were identified using the PAC version 0.1 Ortholog Finder using Arabidopsis R2R3-MYBs as reference (Supplemental Table S1). MYB gene models were identified using the KOG keyword "MYB." All P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera models were manually inspected to ensure that the putative gene models contained two or three MYB DBDs and that the gene models mapped to unique loci in their respective genomes. It is important to note that a proportion of the 21 P. trichocarpa R2R3-MYB genes that have not been assigned to a LG may be alleles of genes already placed on a LG, but as this has not yet been resolved empirically, these 21 genes were treated as distinct loci.

An additional 22 R2R3-MYB transcription factors from other tree species were included in the phylogeny: seven from Pinus taeda, 13 from Picea glauca, and two from Eucalyptus gunnii (Supplemental Table S5). A further 32 "landmark" MYB proteins from a variety of other organisms were also included in the analysis (Supplemental Table S6; Jiang et al., 2004). Sequences were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information protein database (NCBI Entrez; http://www.ncvi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez).

Phylogenetic analysis included the above 506 R2R3-MYB proteins and 15 3R-MYB proteins. The full-length amino acid sequences were aligned with MAFFT using the G-INS-I algorithm (Katoh et al., 2005). A neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA 4 (Tamura et al., 2007) with settings for Jones-Taylor-Thornton substitution model and a Gamma parameter of 1.0 to allow for the uneven rates of substitution across the length of the protein, including the highly conserved N-terminal DBD and the more divergent C-terminal activation domain. Pairwise gap deletion was used to ensure that the C-terminal residues, which are more divergent in MYB proteins, could contribute to the topology of the neighbor-joining tree.

RNA Extraction and Microarray Hybridization

Plant material was ground to a fine powder under liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was extracted from each sample using the procedure described by Chang et al. (1993) for all materials except the seedling samples, which were extracted using the Trizol method (Invitrogen). RNA quality was determined electrophoretically. For each sample, 10 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed, labeled, and hybridized to the Poplar Genome Array according to the manufacturer's protocols (Affymetrix) at the Centre for Applied Genome Evolution and Function at the University of Toronto. The Poplar Genome Array includes 61,251 probe sets representing more than 56,055 transcripts (Affymetrix). The GeneChip probe design is based on the Joint Genome Institute's P. trichocarpa genome project's predicted gene set version 1.1 and all publicly available EST and mRNA sequences for all Populus species available through UniGene Build #6 and GenBank in the spring of 2005. The array probes for transcripts derived from 13 Populus species in addition to the fully sequenced P. trichocarpa genome. For each condition, RNA from three replicate biological samples was extracted and hybridized to a Poplar GeneChip.

Microarray Analysis

GeneChip data analysis was performed using the BioConductor suite (Gentleman et al., 2004) in R (a language and environment for statistical computing; http://www.R-project.org) using the Affy package (Gautier et al., 2004). Preprocessing of the arrays was done using GC-robust multiarray analysis (Gentleman et al., 2004). Probe sets corresponding to the putative R2R3-MYB and 3R-MYB transcription factors were identified using the Probe Match tool on the NetAffx Analysis Centre Web site (Table I; http://www.affymetrix.com/analysis/index.affx). The transcript abundance levels for probe sets corresponding to the putative MYB genes in the P. trichocarpa genome were extracted from the complete data set, and the probe sets were then clustered using hierarchical clustering based on Pearson correlation coefficients (Heatplus; http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.3/bioc/html/Heatplus.html).

Poplar eFP Browser

A Poplar eFP browser (http://www.bar.utoronto.ca/efppop/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi) was developed based on the Bio-Array Resource database framework described by Toufighi et al. (2005) and the eFP engine developed by Winter et al. (2007). Briefly, database tables were generated using MySQL to archive meta information for the samples used to produce the transcriptome data in this study as well as to store the expression data themselves, after the MIAME (for minimum information about a microarray experiment) convention (Brazma et al., 2001). This database may be queried through other tools described by Toufighi et al. (2005), such as Expression Browser, Project Browser, and Expression Angler for identifying coexpressed genes of interest (Toufighi et al., 2005). In the case of the poplar gene expression database, we normalized the Affymetrix data using the GCOS algorithm, with a TGT value of 500. Diagrammatic representations of poplar were generated and processed as described by Winter et al. (2007) to create an input for the eFP browser. In addition, an XML control file was created to instruct the eFP engine for proper functioning. Finally, Arabidopsis-Populus orthologs based on the P. trichocarpa gene models were computed using the OrthoMCL algorithm (Li et al., 2003). These were stored in a separate database along with precomputed Arabidopsis-Populus sequence alignments, generated with MAFFT using the G-INS-I algorithm (Katoh et al., 2005) and displayed on demand using Nigel Brown's MView (Brown et al., 1998) program.

Sequence data from this article can be found in the Joint Genome Institute's Populus trichocarpa v1.1 library (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html), in Genoscope's Vitis vinifera Genome library (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/spip/Vitis-vinifera-e.html), and in the GenBank data library (for all species other than P. trichocarpa and V. vinifera) under the accession numbers listed in Supplemental Tables S1, S3, S4, S5, and S6. Microarray data from this article can be found in the GEO database under accession number GSE13990.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Figure S1. Phylogenetic relationships and subgroup designations in MYB proteins in Populus, Vitis, and Arabidopsis.

Supplemental Figure S2. PtrR2R3-MYB genes in clade 27 have a modified R3 DBD.

Supplemental Figure S3. Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients of the expression profiles of 56 paralogous R2R3-MYB gene pairs as a function of the genetic distance separating each pair.

Supplemental Table S1. R2R3- and 3R-MYB-encoding genes from P. trichocarpa.

Supplemental Table S2. Membership of subgroups on the P. trichocarpa, Arabidopsis, and V. vinifera phylogenetic tree.

Supplemental Table S3. R2R3- and 3R-MYB encoding genes from Arabidopsis.

Supplemental Table S4. R2R3- and 3R-MYB-encoding genes from V. vinifera (¹gene model identified by Matus et al. [2008]).

Supplemental Table S5. R2R3- and 3R-MYB-encoding genes from a variety of tree species.

Supplemental Table S6. Landmark R2R3- and 3R-MYB-encoding genes from a variety of plant species.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We are most grateful to Dr. Levi Waldron and Ms. Than Nguyen for superb technical assistance, to Ms. Josephine McKeever for excellent renderings of plant organs, and to Dr. Barb Thomas and Mr. David Kamelchuk for generously providing Populus plant material. Populus seeds were generously provided by the Canadian National Tree Seed Centre.

Received November 18, 2008; accepted December 12, 2008; published December 17, 2008.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ This work was supported by the Centre for Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function at University of Toronto, by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI; grants to N.J.P.), and by the University of Toronto, CFI, and NSERC (grants to M.M.C.). O.W. was generously supported by a NSERC Canadian Graduate Scholarship.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Malcolm M. Campbell (malcolm.campbell{at}utoronto.ca).

^[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

^[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.132795

^* Corresponding author; e-mail malcolm.campbell{at}utoronto.ca.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15: 63–78[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abe H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Urao T, Iwasaki T, Hosokawa D, Shinozaki K (1997) Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs in drought- and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 9: 1859–1868[Abstract]

Baumann K, Perez-Rodriguez M, Bradley D, Venail J, Bailey P, Jin H, Koes R, Roberts K, Martin C (2007) Control of cell and petal morphogenesis by R2R3 MYB transcription factors. Development 134: 1691–1701[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bedon F, Grima-Pettenati J, Mackay J (2007) Conifer R2R3-MYB transcription factors: sequence analyses and gene expression in wood-forming tissues of white spruce (Picea glauca). BMC Plant Biol 7: 17[CrossRef][Medline]

Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 519–546[CrossRef][Medline]

Bradshaw HD, Ceulemans R, Davis J, Stettler R (2000) Emerging model systems in plant biology: poplar (Populus) as a model forest tree. J Plant Growth Regul 19: 306–313[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, et al (2001) Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME): toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 29: 365–371[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brown NP, Leroy C, Sander C (1998) MView: a web-compatible database search or multiple alignment viewer. Bioinformatics 14: 380–381[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brunner AM, Busov VB, Strauss SH (2004) Poplar genome sequence: functional genomics in an ecologically dominant plant species. Trends Plant Sci 9: 49–56[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chang SJ, Puryear J, Cairney J (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 11: 4

Chen YH, Yang XY, He K, Liu MH, Li JG, Gao ZF, Lin ZQ, Zhang YF, Wang XX, Qiu XM, et al (2006) The MYB transcription factor superfamily of Arabidopsis: expression analysis and phylogenetic comparison with the rice MYB family. Plant Mol Biol 60: 107–124[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cominelli E, Gusmaroli G, Allegra D, Galbiati M, Wade HK, Jenkins GI, Tonelli C (2008) Expression analysis of anthocyanin regulatory genes in response to different light qualities in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 165: 886–894[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Deluc L, Barrieu F, Marchive C, Lauvergeat V, Decendit A, Richard T, Carde JP, Merillon JM, Hamdi S (2006) Characterization of a grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway. Plant Physiol 140: 499–511[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Doebley J, Lukens L (1998) Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form. Plant Cell 10: 1075–1082[Free Full Text]

Durbarry A, Vizir I, Twell D (2005) Male germ line development in Arabidopsis: duo pollen mutants reveal gametophytic regulators of generative cell cycle progression. Plant Physiol 137: 297–307[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feng CP, Andreasson E, Maslak A, Mock HP, Mattsson O, Mundy J (2004) Arabidopsis MYB68 in development and responses to environmental cues. Plant Sci 167: 1099–1107[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA (2004) Affy: analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20: 307–315[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80[CrossRef][Medline]

Gocal GF, Sheldon CC, Gubler F, Moritz T, Bagnall DJ, MacMillan CP, Li SF, Parish RW, Dennis ES, Weigel D, et al (2001) GAMYB-like genes, flowering, and gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127: 1682–1693[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goicoechea M, Lacombe E, Legay S, Mihaljevic S, Rech P, Jauneau A, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Verhaegen D, Chaubet-Gigot N, et al (2005) EgMYB2, a new transcriptional activator from Eucalyptus xylem, regulates secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis. Plant J 43: 553–567[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gonzalez A, Zhao M, Leavitt JM, Lloyd AM (2008) Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 53: 814–827[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Haga N, Kato K, Murase M, Araki S, Kubo M, Demura T, Suzuki K, Muller I, Voss U, Jurgens G, et al (2007) R1R2R3-Myb proteins positively regulate cytokinesis through activation of KNOLLE transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 134: 1101–1110[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hartmann U, Sagasser M, Mehrtens F, Stracke R, Weisshaar B (2005) Differential combinatorial interactions of cis-acting elements recognized by R2R3-MYB, BZIP, and BHLH factors control light-responsive and tissue-specific activation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis genes. Plant Mol Biol 57: 155–171[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Higginson T, Li SF, Parish RW (2003) AtMYB103 regulates tapetum and trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 35: 177–192[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ito M (2005) Conservation and diversification of three-repeat Myb transcription factors in plants. J Plant Res 118: 61–69[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ito M, Araki S, Matsunaga S, Itoh T, Nishihama R, Machida Y, Doonan JH, Watanabe A (2001) G2/M-phase-specific transcription during the plant cell cycle is mediated by c-Myb-like transcription factors. Plant Cell 13: 1891–1905[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jiang C, Gu X, Peterson T (2004) Identification of conserved gene structures and carboxy-terminal motifs in the Myb gene family of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica. Genome Biol 5: R46[CrossRef][Medline]

Jin H, Cominelli E, Bailey P, Parr A, Mehrtens F, Jones J, Tonelli C, Weisshaar B, Martin C (2000) Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 19: 6150–6161[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jin H, Martin C (1999) Multifunctionality and diversity within the plant MYB-gene family. Plant Mol Biol 41: 577–585[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jung C, Seo JS, Han SW, Koo YJ, Kim CH, Song SI, Nahm BH, Choi YD, Cheong JJ (2008) Overexpression of AtMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 146: 623–635[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karpinska B, Karlsson M, Srivastava M, Stenberg A, Schrader J, Sterky F, Bhalerao R, Wingsle G (2004) MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Mol Biol 56: 255–270[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kasahara RD, Portereiko MF, Sandaklie-Nikolova L, Rabiger DS, Drews GN (2005) MYB98 is required for pollen tube guidance and synergid cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 2981–2992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 511–518[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Keller T, Abbott J, Moritz T, Doerner P (2006) Arabidopsis REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEMS1 controls a leaf axil stem cell niche and modulates vegetative development. Plant Cell 18: 598–611[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kranz H, Scholz K, Weisshaar B (2000) c-MYB oncogene-like genes encoding three MYB repeats occur in all major plant lineages. Plant J 21: 231–235[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kranz HD, Denekamp M, Greco R, Jin H, Leyva A, Meissner RC, Petroni K, Urzainqui A, Bevan M, Martin C, et al (1998) Towards functional characterisation of the members of the R2R3-MYB gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 263–276[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS (2003) OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13: 2178–2189[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lipsick JS (1996) One billion years of Myb. Oncogene 13: 223–235[Web of Science][Medline]

Matus JT, Aquea F, Arce-Johnson P (2008) Analysis of the grape MYB R2R3 subfamily reveals expanded wine quality-related clades and conserved gene structure organization across Vitis and Arabidopsis genomes. BMC Plant Biol 8: 83[CrossRef][Medline]

Mehrtens F, Kranz H, Bednarek P, Weisshaar B (2005) The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB12 is a flavonol-specific regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 138: 1083–1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meissner RC, Jin H, Cominelli E, Denekamp M, Fuertes A, Greco R, Kranz HD, Penfield S, Petroni K, Urzainqui A, et al (1999) Function search in a large transcription factor gene family in Arabidopsis: assessing the potential of reverse genetics to identify insertional mutations in R2R3 MYB genes. Plant Cell 11: 1827–1840[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miranda M, Ralph SG, Mellway R, White R, Heath MC, Bohlmann J, Constabel CP (2007) The transcriptional response of hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa x P. deltoides) to infection by Melampsora medusae leaf rust involves induction of flavonoid pathway genes leading to the accumulation of proanthocyanidins. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20: 816–831[CrossRef][Medline]

Moyano E, Martinez-Garcia JF, Martin C (1996) Apparent redundancy in myb gene function provides gearing for the control of flavonoid biosynthesis in Antirrhinum flowers. Plant Cell 8: 1519–1532[Abstract]

Muller D, Schmitz G, Theres K (2006) Blind homologous R2R3 Myb genes control the pattern of lateral meristem initiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 586–597[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogata K, Morikawa S, Nakamura H, Hojo H, Yoshimura S, Zhang R, Aimoto S, Ametani Y, Hirata Z, Sarai A, et al (1995) Comparison of the free and DNA-complexed forms of the DNA-binding domain from c-Myb. Nat Struct Biol 2: 309–320[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Okada M, Akimaru H, Hou DX, Takahashi T, Ishii S (2002) Myb controls G(2)/M progression by inducing cyclin B expression in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. EMBO J 21: 675–684[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Oppenheimer DG, Herman PL, Sivakumaran S, Esch J, Marks MD (1991) A myb gene required for leaf trichome differentiation in Arabidopsis is expressed in stipules. Cell 67: 483–493[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Patzlaff A, McInnis S, Courtenay A, Surman C, Newman LJ, Smith C, Bevan MW, Mansfield S, Whetten RW, Sederoff RR, et al (2003) Characterisation of a pine MYB that regulates lignification. Plant J 36: 743–754[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Perez-Rodriguez M, Jaffe FW, Butelli E, Glover BJ, Martin C (2005) Development of three different cell types is associated with the activity of a specific MYB transcription factor in the ventral petal of Antirrhinum majus flowers. Development 132: 359–370[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peters DJ, Constabel CP (2002) Molecular analysis of herbivore-induced condensed tannin synthesis: cloning and expression of dihydroflavonol reductase from trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Plant J 32: 701–712[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Quattrocchio F, Wing J, van der Woude K, Souer E, de Vetten N, Mol J, Koes R (1999) Molecular analysis of the anthocyanin2 gene of Petunia and its role in the evolution of flower color. Plant Cell 11: 1433–1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rhee SY, Beavis W, Berardini TZ, Chen G, Dixon D, Doyle A, Garcia-Hernandez M, Huala E, Lander G, Montoya M, et al (2003) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 224–228[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang CZ, Keddie J, Adam L, Pineda O, Ratcliffe OJ, Samaha RR, et al (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290: 2105–2110[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosinski JA, Atchley WR (1998) Molecular evolution of the Myb family of transcription factors: evidence for polyphyletic origin. J Mol Evol 46: 74–83[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schmitz G, Tillmann E, Carriero F, Fiore C, Cellini F, Theres K (2002) The tomato Blind gene encodes a MYB transcription factor that controls the formation of lateral meristems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1064–1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shin B, Choi G, Yi H, Yang S, Cho I, Kim J, Lee S, Paek NC, Kim JH, Song PS (2002) AtMYB21, a gene encoding a flower-specific transcription factor, is regulated by COP1. Plant J 30: 23–32[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stracke R, Ishihara H, Huep G, Barsch A, Mehrtens F, Niehaus K, Weisshaar B (2007) Differential regulation of closely related R2R3-MYB transcription factors controls flavonol accumulation in different parts of the Arabidopsis thaliana seedling. Plant J 50: 660–677[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stracke R, Werber M, Weisshaar B (2001) The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4: 447–456[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Teng S, Keurentjes J, Bentsink L, Koornneef M, Smeekens S (2005) Sucrose-specific induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis requires the MYB75/PAP1 gene. Plant Physiol 139: 1840–1852[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tominaga R, Iwata M, Okada K, Wada T (2007) Functional analysis of the epidermal-specific MYB genes CAPRICE and WEREWOLF in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 2264–2277[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toufighi K, Brady SM, Austin R, Ly E, Provart NJ (2005) The Botany Array Resource: e-northerns, expression angling, and promoter analyses. Plant J 43: 153–163[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, et al (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596–1604[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Urao T, Noji M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1996) A transcriptional activation domain of AtMYB2, a drought-inducible Arabidopsis Myb-related protein. Plant J 10: 1145–1148[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A, Pruss D, Pindo M, Fitzgerald LM, Vezzulli S, Reid J, et al (2007) A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS One 2: e1326[CrossRef][Medline]

Wada T, Tachibana T, Shimura Y, Okada K (1997) Epidermal cell differentiation in Arabidopsis determined by a Myb homolog, CPC. Science 277: 1113–1116[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weatherbee SD, Halder G, Kim J, Hudson A, Carroll S (1998) Ultrabithorax regulates genes at several levels of the wing-patterning hierarchy to shape the development of the Drosophila haltere. Genes Dev 12: 1474–1482[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Winter D, Vinegar B, Nahal H, Ammar R, Wilson GV, Provart NJ (2007) An "electronic fluorescent pictograph" browser for exploring and analyzing large-scale biological data sets. PLoS One 2: e718[CrossRef][Medline]

Yang XY, Li JG, Pei M, Gu H, Chen ZL, Qu LJ (2007) Over-expression of a flower-specific transcription factor gene AtMYB24 causes aberrant anther development. Plant Cell Rep 26: 219–228[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhang ZB, Zhu J, Gao JF, Wang C, Li H, Zhang HQ, Zhang S, Wang DM, Wang QX, Huang H, et al (2007) Transcription factor AtMYB103 is required for anther development by regulating tapetum development, callose dissolution and exine formation in Arabidopsis. Plant J 52: 528–538[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye ZH (2007) The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 2776–2792[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Mellway, L. T. Tran, M. B. Prouse, M. M. Campbell, and C. P. Constabel The Wound-, Pathogen-, and Ultraviolet B-Responsive MYB134 Gene Encodes an R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates Proanthocyanidin Synthesis in Poplar Plant Physiology, June 1, 2009; 150(2): 924 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data OA All Versions of this Article: 149/2/981    most recent pp.108.132795v2 pp.108.132795v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases GEO DataSet Agricola Articles by Wilkins, O. Articles by Campbell, M. M.