Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (57)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.

Plant Physiol, June 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 423-426

National Science Foundation-Sponsored Workshop Report: "The 2010 Project"
Functional Genomics and the Virtual Plant. A Blueprint for Understanding How Plants Are Built and How to Improve Them

Joanne Chory,1 Joseph R. Ecker,1 Steve Briggs, Michel Caboche, Gloria M. Coruzzi, Doug Cook, Jeffrey Dangl, Sarah Grant, Mary Lou Guerinot, Steven Henikoff, Rob Martienssen, Kiyotaka Okada, Natasha V. Raikhel, Chris R. Somerville, and Detlef Weigel

Howard Hughes Medical Institute/The Salk Insitute for Biological Studies, Plant Biology Laboratory, San Diego, California 92186-5800 (J.C.); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6018 (J.R.E.); Novartis Agricultural Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California 92037 (S.B.); Unité de Recherche en Génomique Végétale Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78026 Versailles cedex, France (M.C.); New York University, New York, New York 10003 (G.M.C.); Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 (D.C.); University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 (J.D., S.G.); Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-3576 (M.L.G.); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 (S.H.); Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724-2212 (R.M.); Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan (K.O.); Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312 (N.V.R.); Carnegie Institute of Plant Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4101 (C.R.S.); and The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037 (D.W.)


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
MISSION STATEMENT
LONG-TERM GOAL
WHERE WILL THE 2010...
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

Although future developments in a rapidly emerging field can be difficult to predict, some projections and evaluations are helpful in planning for the development of community resources and other initiatives that may facilitate progress. To make these projections and evaluations, a group of scientists met at The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, on January 13 and 14, 2000. The workshop, co-chaired by Joanne Chory and Joseph Ecker, included the following group of scientists: Steven Briggs, Michel Caboche, Gloria Coruzzi, Doug Cook, Jeff Dangl, Sarah Grant, Mary Lou Guerinot, Steven Henikoff, Rob Martienssen, Kiyotaka Okada, Natasha Raikhel, Chris Somerville, and Detlef Weigel. To give the report from this group the widest possible distribution, a summary is printed below. The complete text of this document and an accompanying report from a meeting held on November 23 and 24, 1998, at the Carnegie Institution of Washington (Stanford, CA) are posted on the The Arabidopsis Information Resource Web site (http://www.Arabidopsis.org). The Carnegie-Stanford workshop was co-chaired by Chris Somerville and Joe Ecker and included the following group of scientists: Roger Beachy, Charles Gasser, Steve Kay, Kenneth Keegstra, Rob Martienssen, Susan McCouch, Elliot Meyerowitz, Eric Ward, and Susan Wessler. The idea of "The 2010 Project" is a synthesis of the two workshops (Carnegie-Stanford and San Diego-Salk) and a result of the work of a group of people with diverse scientific backgrounds. The ultimate goal of The 2010 Project is to broaden the scope to consider how genomics could be applied to understand all plants. Since Arabidopsis is far ahead of all other plant systems, many initiatives are focused on Arabidopsis. However, an implicit goal is to begin asking how and what we need to do to bring other plants forward as efficiently as possible, taking advantage of the power of a model system. We invite the community of plant biologists at large to read both reports and to express your views and offer your suggestions; these will be posted on the The Arabidopsis Information Resource Web site. Your suggestions can also be sent via e-mail to the following address (project2010{at}aspp.org) and they will be posted on the Plant Physiology Web site at the American Society of Plant Physiologists (http://www.aspp.org). Additional community input will be sought at the Arabidopsis meeting in Madison, Wisconsin, in June 2000. We will take into consideration all comments and suggestions in preparing the final workshop report to be submitted to the National Science Foundation this summer. Your opinions are very important and we are looking forward to a discussion of the important issues raised by this report.

About 10 years ago, plant scientists adopted the widespread use of an easily manipulated model called Arabidopsis, and established an international research effort called The Multinational Coordinated Arabidopsis Genome Research Project. As an outcome of this effort, the entire DNA sequence of this plant will be completed by mid-year in 2000. For the first time, we will know the sequence of 25,000 genes that are necessary for a plant to function as a flowering plant. As a follow-up to the Arabidopsis genome sequencing efforts, an important and revolutionary new initiative---to exploit the revolution in plant genomics by understanding the function of all genes of a reference species within their cellular, organismal, and evolutionary context by the year 2010 (The 2010 Project)---has been proposed by the community of plant biologists. Implicit in this mission statement is an endorsement of the allocation of resources to attempts to assign function to genes that have no known phenotype, which represents a significant departure from the common practice of defining and justifying a scientific goal based on the biological phenomena. The rationale for endorsing this radical change is that for the first time it is feasible for plant biologists to envision a whole-system approach to the study of plant form and function. The committee discussed the feasibility of commencing a publicly funded program to determine the function of all Arabidopsis genes during the next decade, using a systems approach. The committee has identified specific project goals that include: the development of expanded genetic toolkits as a service to the research community; a whole-systems approach to identification of gene function from the molecular to evolutionary levels; an expanding of the role for bioinformatics; the development of human resources; and international collaboration.


    MISSION STATEMENT
TOP
INTRODUCTION
MISSION STATEMENT
LONG-TERM GOAL
WHERE WILL THE 2010...
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

To exploit the revolution in plant genomics by understanding the function of all genes of a reference species within their cellular, organismal, and evolutionary context.


    LONG-TERM GOAL
TOP
INTRODUCTION
MISSION STATEMENT
LONG-TERM GOAL
WHERE WILL THE 2010...
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

In order to most efficiently and safely manipulate plants to meet growing societal needs, we must create a wiring diagram of a plant through its entire life cycle: from germinating seed to production of the next generation of seeds in mature flowers. These processes are guided by genes and the proteins they encode. They are directed by both intrinsic developmental cues and environmental signals. The long-term goal for plant biology following complete sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome is to understand every molecular interaction in every cell throughout a plant lifecycle. In essence, to understand the function of every gene by the year 2010.

The ultimate expression of our goal is nothing short of a virtual plant which one could observe growing on a computer screen, stopping this process at any point in that development, and with the click of a computer mouse, accessing all the genetic information expressed in any organ or cell under a variety of environmental conditions. Completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence provides significant leverage for future plant genome projects. The reference genome is a platform from which useful comparisons are simplified. We will ultimately be able to predict the evolution of new gene function by comparative genomics with other key plant species.


    WHERE WILL THE 2010 PROJECT LEAD US IN THE FUTURE?
TOP
INTRODUCTION
MISSION STATEMENT
LONG-TERM GOAL
WHERE WILL THE 2010...
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

Whole-systems-based knowledge of the entire biology of a reference species confers predictive power that will enable the following:
1.   Predictable outcomes to directed experimental genetic changes.
2.   Directed genetic changes that accelerate domestication of wild species.
3.   Facile genetic manipulation that ensures maintenance of, and expansion of germplasm bases.
4.   A description of the underlying mechanisms of heterosis, and the ability to use this phenomenon more effectively.
5.   Enhanced understanding of the genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity, which will have a profound impact not just in plants, but also in animals, including humans.
6.   Knowledge of the minimum gene set required for plant life.
7.   Understanding of the genetic basis of plant evolution, which will enrich our understanding of the diversity of life on earth.
8.   An understanding of interactions between plants and other organisms in their environment, up to the level of ecosystems.


    SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES
TOP
INTRODUCTION
MISSION STATEMENT
LONG-TERM GOAL
WHERE WILL THE 2010...
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

New experimental tools that investigate gene function at the subcellular, cellular, organ, organismal, and ecosystem level need to be developed. New bioinformatics tools to analyze and extract meaning from increasingly systems-based datasets will need to be developed. These will require, in part, creation of entirely new tools. An important and revolutionary aspect of The 2010 Project is that it implicitly endorses the allocation of resources to attempts to assign function to genes that have no known function. This represents a significant departure from the common practice of defining and justifying a scientific goal based on the biological phenomena. The rationale for endorsing this radical change is that for the first time it is feasible to envision a whole-systems approach to gene and protein function. This whole-systems approach promises to be orders of magnitude more efficient than the conventional approach.

Exploitation of the Arabidopsis genome sequence to achieve the goals outlined above will require significant new investment in dedicated, focused, genome technology centers. These centers should be both dispersed and single site. They will serve the research community at large by providing services and by producing new tools using economies of scale. The centers will be dedicated to the creation of genome-wide tools, rather than to the application of genome-wide tools to solving specific research problems. They will thus be explicitly public service oriented, as was the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project.

In creating genome-wide tools, the centers must complement and significantly enable investigators throughout the U.S. and the world. Individual investigators will be at once the main clientele for the centers and the dispersed creators of knowledge. The value of this project therefore depends on the availability of significant support for individual research laboratories throughout the plant biology research community to leverage investment in both the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project and the proposed centers to solve a wide range of specific biological problems.

The committee has discussed the impact that this project would have on the progress of basic plant research, as well as strategic interests of the U.S. as they relate to agriculture, energy, the environment, and human health. Over the last 10 years, The Multinational Arabidopsis Steering Committee and the North American Steering Committee have been important liaisons between the community at large and policy makers in North America, Europe, and the Pacific Rim. To date, the Arabidopsis community is a model of how these structures can minimize duplication of efforts and enhance research resources worldwide. The committee recommends that The 2010 Project be implemented as soon as possible and we solicit your comments (see above).

    FOOTNOTES

1 J.C. and J.R.E. were co-chairpersons of The 2010 Project Workshop held at The Salk Institute.

© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. M. Brady and N. J. Provart
Web-Queryable Large-Scale Data Sets for Hypothesis Generation in Plant Biology
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2009; 21(4): 1034 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
A. Krishnan and A. Pereira
Integrative approaches for mining transcriptional regulatory programs in Arabidopsis
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, July 16, 2008; (2008) eln035v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. P. Trivedi
Profile of Joseph R. Ecker
PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3023 - 3025.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
J. H. Ahn, J. Kim, S. J. Yoo, S. Y. Yoo, H. Roh, J.-H. Choi, M. S. Choi, K. S. Chung, E. J. Han, S. M. Hong, et al.
Isolation of 151 Mutants that Have Developmental Defects from T-DNA Tagging
Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 169 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
Z. Lei, A. M. Elmer, B. S. Watson, R. A. Dixon, P. J. Mendes, and L. W. Sumner
A Two-dimensional Electrophoresis Proteomic Reference Map and Systematic Identification of 1367 Proteins from a Cell Suspension Culture of the Model Legume Medicago truncatula
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1812 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. S. Katari, V. Balija, R. K. Wilson, R. A. Martienssen, and W. R. McCombie
Comparing low coverage random shotgun sequence data from Brassica oleracea and Oryza sativa genome sequence for their ability to add to the annotation of Arabidopsis thaliana
Genome Res., April 1, 2005; 15(4): 496 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. A. Gutierrez, M. D. Larson, and C. Wilkerson
The Plant-Specific Database. Classification of Arabidopsis Proteins Based on Their Phylogenetic Profile
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 1888 - 1892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. A. A. Dosio, H. Rey, J. Lecoeur, N. G. Izquierdo, L. A. N. Aguirrezabal, F. Tardieu, and O. Turc
A whole-plant analysis of the dynamics of expansion of individual leaves of two sunflower hybrids
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2003; 54(392): 2541 - 2552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Achieving the in Silico Plant. Systems Biology and the Future of Plant Biological Research
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 404 - 409.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Pan, H. Liu, J. Clarke, J. Jones, M. Bevan, and L. Stein
ATIDB: Arabidopsis thaliana insertion database
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2003; 31(4): 1245 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Y. Rhee, W. Beavis, T. Z. Berardini, G. Chen, D. Dixon, A. Doyle, M. Garcia-Hernandez, E. Huala, G. Lander, M. Montoya, et al.
The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2003; 31(1): 224 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. W. White and G. Hoogenboom
Gene-Based Approaches to Crop Simulation: Past Experiences and Future Opportunities
Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 52 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Sessions, E. Burke, G. Presting, G. Aux, J. McElver, D. Patton, B. Dietrich, P. Ho, J. Bacwaden, C. Ko, et al.
A High-Throughput Arabidopsis Reverse Genetics System
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2002; 14(12): 2985 - 2994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. M. Ausubel
Summaries of National Science Foundation-Sponsored Arabidopsis 2010 Projects and National Science Foundation-Sponsored Plant Genome Projects That Are Generating Arabidopsis Resources for the Community
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2002; 129(2): 394 - 437.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. J. Budziszewski, S. P. Lewis, L. W. Glover, J. Reineke, G. Jones, L. S. Ziemnik, J. Lonowski, B. Nyfeler, G. Aux, Q. Zhou, et al.
Arabidopsis Genes Essential for Seedling Viability: Isolation of Insertional Mutants and Molecular Cloning
Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1765 - 1778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Draper, L. A.J. Mur, G. Jenkins, G. C. Ghosh-Biswas, P. Bablak, R. Hasterok, and A. P.M. Routledge
Brachypodium distachyon. A New Model System for Functional Genomics in Grasses
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2001; 127(4): 1539 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
G. C. MacIntosh, C. Wilkerson, and P. J. Green
Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Expressed Sequence Tags Characteristic of Non-Coding RNAs
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2001; 127(3): 765 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. Scheres and J. Browse
Playing with Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2001; 126(2): 468 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. S. Poethig
Life with 25,000 Genes
Genome Res., March 1, 2001; 11(3): 313 - 316.
[Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
N. V. Raikhel
Plant Physiology: Past, Present, and Future
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2001; 125(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. M. Ausubel
Arabidopsis Genome. A Milestone in Plant Biology
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2000; 124(4): 1451 - 1454.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (57)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chory, J.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Plant Biologists