|
|
||||||||
|
First published online June 12, 2003; 10.1104/pp.102.018564 Plant Physiology 132:1186-1195 (2003) © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists Calmodulin Is Involved in Heat Shock Signal Transduction in Wheat1Institute of Molecular Cell Biology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050016, People's Republic of China (H.-T.L., B.L., Z.-L.S., R.-L.M., D.-Y.S., R.-G.Z.); and Institute of Agro-physics, Physiology, and Biochemistry, Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050051, People's Republic of China (H.-T.L., B.L., X.-Z.L., R.-L.M., R.-G.Z.)
The involvement of calcium and calcium-activated calmodulin (Ca2+-CaM) in heat shock (HS) signal transduction in wheat (Triticum aestivum) was investigated. Using Fluo-3/acetoxymethyl esters and laser scanning confocal microscopy, it was found that the increase of intracellular free calcium ion concentration started within 1 min after a 37°C HS. The levels of CaM mRNA and protein increased during HS at 37°C in the presence of Ca2+. The expression of hsp26 and hsp70 genes was up-regulated by the addition of CaCl2 and down-regulated by the calcium ion chelator EGTA, the calcium ion channel blockers LaCl3 and verapamil, or the CaM antagonists N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide and chlorpromazine. Treatment with Ca2+ also increased, and with EGTA, verapamil, chlorpromazine, or trifluoperazine decreased, synthesis of HS proteins. The temporal expression of the CaM1-2 gene and the hsp26 and hsp70 genes demonstrated that up-regulation of the CaM1-2 gene occurred at 10 min after HS at 37°C, whereas that of hsp26 and hsp70 appeared at 20 min after HS. A 5-min HS induced expression of hsp26 after a period of recovery at 22°C after HS at 37°C. Taken together, these results indicate that Ca2+-CaM is directly involved in the HS signal transduction pathway. A working hypothesis about the relationship between upstream and downstream of HS signal transduction is presented.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.102.018564.
1 This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(grant no. 3977075), by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province,
China (grant no. 301447), and by the National Key Basic Research Special
Funds, China (G19990
*
Corresponding author; e-mail
zhourengang{at}163.com;
fax 0086-311-7042490.
Received December 6, 2002;
returned for revision January 14, 2003;
accepted March 17, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|