Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online December 22, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.090662

Plant Physiology 143:849-865 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
143/2/849    most recent
pp.106.090662v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kempema, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walling, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kempema, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walling, L. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kempema, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walling, L. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Plant-Herbivore Interactions
PLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS

Arabidopsis Transcriptome Changes in Response to Phloem-Feeding Silverleaf Whitefly Nymphs. Similarities and Distinctions in Responses to Aphids1,[W],[OA]

Louisa A. Kempema, Xinping Cui, Frances M. Holzer and Linda L. Walling*

Department of Botany and Plant Sciences (L.A.K., F.M.H., L.L.W.) and Department of Statistics (X.C.), Center for Plant Cell Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521–0124

Phloem-feeding pests cause extensive crop damage throughout the world, yet little is understood about how plants perceive and defend themselves from these threats. The silverleaf whitefly (SLWF; Bemisia tabaci type B) is a good model for studying phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions, as SLWF nymphs cause little wounding and have a long, continuous interaction with the plant. Using the Affymetrix ATH1 GeneChip to monitor the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) transcriptome, 700 transcripts were found to be up-regulated and 556 down-regulated by SLWF nymphs. Closer examination of the regulation of secondary metabolite (glucosinolate) and defense pathway genes after SLWF-instar feeding shows that responses were qualitatively and quantitatively different from chewing insects and aphids. In addition to the RNA profile distinctions, analysis of SLWF performance on wild-type and phytoalexin-deficient4 (pad4) mutants suggests aphid and SLWF interactions with Arabidopsis were distinct. While pad4-1 mutants were more susceptible to aphids, SLWF development on pad4-1 and wild-type plants was similar. Furthermore, although jasmonic acid genes were repressed and salicylic acid-regulated genes were induced after SLWF feeding, cytological staining of SLWF-infested tissue showed that pathogen defenses, such as localized cell death and hydrogen peroxide accumulation, were not observed. Like aphid and fungal pathogens, callose synthase gene RNAs accumulated and callose deposition was observed in SLWF-infested tissue. These results provide a more comprehensive understanding of phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions and distinguish SLWF global responses.


1 This work was supported in part by the California Agricultural Experiment Station, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Southwest Consortium (Grant for Genetics and Water Resources), and the USDA National Research Initiative (Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service award no. 99–35301–8077 to L.L.W.). A Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need fellowship (DE P200A030254 to R. Cardullo, Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside) provided partial support for L.A.K.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Linda L. Walling (linda.walling{at}ucr.edu).

[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.090662

* Corresponding author; e-mail linda.walling{at}ucr.edu; fax 951–827–4437.

Received October 17, 2006; accepted December 13, 2006; published December 22, 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Volodarsky, N. Leviatan, A. Otcheretianski, and R. Fluhr
HORMONOMETER: A Tool for Discerning Transcript Signatures of Hormone Action in the Arabidopsis Transcriptome
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2009; 150(4): 1796 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
V. Gosset, N. Harmel, C. Gobel, F. Francis, E. Haubruge, J.-P. Wathelet, P. du Jardin, I. Feussner, and M.-L. Fauconnier
Attacks by a piercing-sucking insect (Myzus persicae Sultzer) or a chewing insect (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) on potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) induce differential changes in volatile compound release and oxylipin synthesis
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1231 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. D. Nabity, J. A. Zavala, and E. H. DeLucia
Indirect suppression of photosynthesis on individual leaves by arthropod herbivory
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(4): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J.-Y. Yang, M. Iwasaki, C. Machida, Y. Machida, X. Zhou, and N.-H. Chua
{beta}C1, the pathogenicity factor of TYLCCNV, interacts with AS1 to alter leaf development and suppress selective jasmonic acid responses
Genes & Dev., September 15, 2008; 22(18): 2564 - 2577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. D. Girling, R. Madison, M. Hassall, G. M. Poppy, and J. G. Turner
Investigations into plant biochemical wound-response pathways involved in the production of aphid-induced plant volatiles
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3077 - 3085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Koornneef, A. Leon-Reyes, T. Ritsema, A. Verhage, F. C. Den Otter, L.C. Van Loon, and C. M.J. Pieterse
Kinetics of Salicylate-Mediated Suppression of Jasmonate Signaling Reveal a Role for Redox Modulation
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2008; 147(3): 1358 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Singh, I. K. Singh, and P. K. Verma
Differential transcript accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. in response to a chewing insect Helicoverpa armigera and defence regulators correlate with reduced insect performance
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2379 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. Hao, C. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Chen, M. Tang, B. Du, L. Zhu, and G. He
Herbivore-Induced Callose Deposition on the Sieve Plates of Rice: An Important Mechanism for Host Resistance
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1810 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S.-J. Zheng and M. Dicke
Ecological Genomics of Plant-Insect Interactions: From Gene to Community
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 812 - 817.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Zhu-Salzman, D. S. Luthe, and G. W. Felton
Arthropod-Inducible Proteins: Broad Spectrum Defenses against Multiple Herbivores
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 852 - 858.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
L. L. Walling
Avoiding Effective Defenses: Strategies Employed by Phloem-Feeding Insects
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 859 - 866.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. I. Zarate, L. A. Kempema, and L. L. Walling
Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 866 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Plant Biologists