|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 7, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.110924 Plant Physiology 146:737-747 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
The Contribution of Photosynthesis to the Red Light Response of Stomatal Conductance1,[OA]Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
To determine the contribution of photosynthesis on stomatal conductance, we contrasted the stomatal red light response of wild-type tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum W38) with that of plants impaired in photosynthesis by antisense reductions in the content of either cytochrome b6f complex (anti-b/f plants) or Rubisco (anti-SSU plants). Both transgenic genotypes showed a lowered content of the antisense target proteins in guard cells as well as in the mesophyll. In the anti-b/f plants, CO2 assimilation rates were proportional to leaf cytochrome b6f content, but there was little effect on stomatal conductance and the rate of stomatal opening. To compare the relationship between photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, wild-type plants and anti-SSU plants were grown at 30 and 300 µmol photon m–2 s–1 irradiance (low light and medium light [ML], respectively). Growth in ML increased CO2 assimilation rates and stomatal conductance in both genotypes. Despite the significantly lower CO2 assimilation rate in the anti-SSU plants, the differences in stomatal conductance between the genotypes were nonsignificant at either growth irradiance. Irrespective of plant genotype, stomatal density in the two leaf surfaces was 2-fold higher in ML-grown plants than in low-light-grown plants and conductance normalized to stomatal density was unaffected by growth irradiance. We conclude that the red light response of stomatal conductance is independent of the concurrent photosynthetic rate of the guard cells or of that of the underlying mesophyll. Furthermore, we suggest that the correlation of photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance observed under different light environments is caused by signals largely independent of photosynthesis.
1 This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (Discovery Grant no. DP0343270). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Susanne von Caemmerer (susanne.caemmerer{at}anu.edu.au). [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.110924 * Corresponding author; e-mail susanne.caemmerer{at}anu.edu.au. Received October 14, 2007; accepted December 2, 2007; published December 7, 2007. Related articles in Plant Physiol.:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|