Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online December 7, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.110924

Plant Physiology 146:737-747 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
146/2/737    most recent
pp.107.110924v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Physiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baroli, I.
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baroli, I.
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baroli, I.
Right arrow Articles by von Caemmerer, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biology of Transpiration
BIOENERGETICS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

The Contribution of Photosynthesis to the Red Light Response of Stomatal Conductance1,[OA]

Irene Baroli, G. Dean Price, Murray R. Badger and Susanne von Caemmerer*

Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia

To determine the contribution of photosynthesis on stomatal conductance, we contrasted the stomatal red light response of wild-type tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum ‘W38’) with that of plants impaired in photosynthesis by antisense reductions in the content of either cytochrome b6f complex (anti-b/f plants) or Rubisco (anti-SSU plants). Both transgenic genotypes showed a lowered content of the antisense target proteins in guard cells as well as in the mesophyll. In the anti-b/f plants, CO2 assimilation rates were proportional to leaf cytochrome b6f content, but there was little effect on stomatal conductance and the rate of stomatal opening. To compare the relationship between photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, wild-type plants and anti-SSU plants were grown at 30 and 300 µmol photon m–2 s–1 irradiance (low light and medium light [ML], respectively). Growth in ML increased CO2 assimilation rates and stomatal conductance in both genotypes. Despite the significantly lower CO2 assimilation rate in the anti-SSU plants, the differences in stomatal conductance between the genotypes were nonsignificant at either growth irradiance. Irrespective of plant genotype, stomatal density in the two leaf surfaces was 2-fold higher in ML-grown plants than in low-light-grown plants and conductance normalized to stomatal density was unaffected by growth irradiance. We conclude that the red light response of stomatal conductance is independent of the concurrent photosynthetic rate of the guard cells or of that of the underlying mesophyll. Furthermore, we suggest that the correlation of photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance observed under different light environments is caused by signals largely independent of photosynthesis.


1 This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (Discovery Grant no. DP0343270).

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Susanne von Caemmerer (susanne.caemmerer{at}anu.edu.au).

[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.110924

* Corresponding author; e-mail susanne.caemmerer{at}anu.edu.au.

Received October 14, 2007; accepted December 2, 2007; published December 7, 2007.


Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

On the Inside
Peter V. Minorsky
Plant Physiol. 2008 146: 323-324. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol PlantHome page
F.-F. Wang, H.-L. Lian, C.-Y. Kang, and H.-Q. Yang
Phytochrome B Is Involved in Mediating Red Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis thaliana
Mol Plant, November 24, 2009; (2009) ssp097v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. E. Boccalandro, M. L. Rugnone, J. E. Moreno, E. L. Ploschuk, L. Serna, M. J. Yanovsky, and J. J. Casal
Phytochrome B Enhances Photosynthesis at the Expense of Water-Use Efficiency in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2009; 150(2): 1083 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. Lawson, S. Lefebvre, N. R. Baker, J. I. L. Morison, and C. A. Raines
Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3609 - 3619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Doi and K.-i. Shimazaki
The Stomata of the Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris Do Not Respond to CO2 in the Dark and Open by Photosynthesis in Guard Cells
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 922 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists