|
|
||||||||
|
First published online April 23, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.119321 Plant Physiology 147:696-706 (2008) © 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists Induction of the Arabidopsis PHO1;H10 Gene by 12-Oxo-Phytodienoic Acid But Not Jasmonic Acid via a CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1-Dependent Pathway1Département de Biologie Moléculaire Végétale, Biophore, Université de Lausanne, CH–1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Expression of AtPHO1;H10, a member of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PHO1 gene family, is strongly induced following numerous abiotic and biotic stresses, including wounding, dehydration, cold, salt, and pathogen attack. AtPHO1;H10 expression by wounding was localized to the cells in the close vicinity of the wound site. AtPHO1;H10 expression was increased by application of the jasmonic acid (JA) precursor 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), but not by JA or coronatine. Surprisingly, induction of AtPHO1;H10 by OPDA was dependent on the presence of CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 (COI1). The induction of AtPHO1;H10 expression by wounding and dehydration was dependent on COI1 and was comparable in both the wild type and the OPDA reductase 3-deficient (opr3) mutant. In contrast, induction of AtPHO1;H10 expression by exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) was independent of the presence of either OPDA or COI1, but was strongly decreased in the ABA-insensitive mutant abi1-1. The involvement of the ABA pathway in regulating AtPHO1;H10 was distinct between wounding and dehydration, with induction of AtPHO1;H10 by wounding being comparable to wild type in the ABA-deficient mutant aba1-3 and abi1-1, whereas a strong reduction in AtPHO1;H10 expression occurred in aba1-3 and abi1-1 following dehydration. Together, these results reveal that OPDA can modulate gene expression via COI1 in a manner distinct from JA, and independently from ABA. Furthermore, the implication of the ABA pathway in coregulating AtPHO1;H10 expression is dependent on the abiotic stress applied, being weak under wounding but strong upon dehydration.
1 This work was supported the Fonds National Suisse (grant no. 3100A0–105874 to Y.P.) and the Etat de Vaud. 2 Present address: Bayer CropScience, 14–20 rue Pierre Baizet, 69263, Lyon cedex 9, France. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Yves Poirier (yves.poirier{at}unil.ch). www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.119321 * Corresponding author; e-mail yves.poirier{at}unil.ch. Received March 18, 2008; accepted April 8, 2008; published April 23, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|