Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology Preview
Published on April 3, 2003; 10.1104/pp.102.018143


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Plant Physiology Preview (PDF))
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/1/292    most recent
pp.102.018143v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tanksley, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tanksley, S. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tanksley, S. D.

Received November 22, 2002
Returned for revision January 2, 2003
Accepted January 23, 2003

Generation and Analysis of an Artificial Gene Dosage Series in Tomato to Study the Mechanisms by Which the Cloned Quantitative Trait Locus fw2.2 Controls Fruit Size

Jiping Liu , Bin Cong , and Steven D. Tanksley *

Department of Plant Breeding and Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

* Corresponding author; email: sdt4{at}cornell.edu.

It has been proposed that fw2.2 encodes a negative fruit-growth regulator that underlies natural fruit-size variation in tomato (Lycopersicon spp.) via heterochronic allelic variation of fw2.2 expression, rather than by variation in the structural protein itself. To further test the negative regulator and the transcriptional control hypotheses, a gene dosage series was constructed, which produced a wider range of fw2.2 transcript accumulation than can be found in natural tomato populations. Fruit developmental analyses revealed that fw2.2 transcript levels were highly correlated (negatively) with fruit mass, supporting the negative regulator and transcriptional regulation hypotheses. Further, the effect of fw2.2 on fruit mass was mediated by repressing three- and two-dimensional cell division in placental and pericarp tissues, respectively. Finally, fw2.2 had little effect on fertility and seed size/number, indicating that fruit size effects of fw2.2 are due largely to expression in the maternal tissues of developing fruit and not mediated through fertility or seed-setting-related processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. Schauer, Y. Semel, I. Balbo, M. Steinfath, D. Repsilber, J. Selbig, T. Pleban, D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie
Mode of Inheritance of Primary Metabolic Traits in Tomato
PLANT CELL, March 1, 2008; 20(3): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. Carrari and A. R. Fernie
Metabolic regulation underlying tomato fruit development
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2006; 57(9): 1883 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Baldet, M. Hernould, F. Laporte, F. Mounet, D. Just, A. Mouras, C. Chevalier, and C. Rothan
The expression of cell proliferation-related genes in early developing flowers is affected by a fruit load reduction in tomato plants
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(4): 961 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
L. Fernandez, C. Romieu, A. Moing, A. Bouquet, M. Maucourt, M. R. Thomas, and L. Torregrosa
The Grapevine fleshless berry Mutation. A Unique Genotype to Investigate Differences between Fleshy and Nonfleshy Fruit
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 537 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Bomblies and J. F. Doebley
Pleiotropic Effects of the Duplicate Maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY Genes zfl1 and zfl2 on Traits Under Selection During Maize Domestication
Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 519 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Cheniclet, W. Y. Rong, M. Causse, N. Frangne, L. Bolling, J.-P. Carde, and J.-P. Renaudin
Cell Expansion and Endoreduplication Show a Large Genetic Variability in Pericarp and Contribute Strongly to Tomato Fruit Growth
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2005; 139(4): 1984 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. F. HANCOCK
Contributions of Domesticated Plant Studies to our Understanding of Plant Evolution
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2005; 96(6): 953 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. D. Tanksley
The Genetic, Developmental, and Molecular Bases of Fruit Size and Shape Variation in Tomato
PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(suppl_1): S181 - S189.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists