Plant Physiology Preview
Published on December 30, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.028324
Received June 10, 2003
Returned for revision July 24, 2003
Accepted October 9, 2003
Transcriptional Regulation of Sorghum Defense Determinants against a Phloem-Feeding Aphid
Keyan Zhu-Salzman *, Ron A. Salzman , Ji-Eun Ahn , and Hisashi Koiwa
Departments of Entomology (K.Z.-S., J.-E.A.), Biochemistry and Biophysics (R.A.S.), and Horticultural Sciences (H.K.), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
* Corresponding author; email: ksalzman{at}tamu.edu.
When attacked by a phloem-feeding greenbug aphid (Schizaphis graminum), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) activates jasmonic acid (JA)- and salicylic acid (SA)-regulated genes, as well as genes outside known wounding and SA signaling pathways. A collection of 672 cDNAs was obtained by differential subtraction with cDNAs prepared from sorghum seedlings infested by greenbug aphids and those from uninfested seedlings. Subsequent expression profiling using DNA microarray and northern-blot analyses identified 82 transcript types from this collection responsive to greenbug feeding, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), or SA application. DNA sequencing analyses indicated that these encoded proteins functioning in direct defense, defense signaling, oxidative burst, secondary metabolism, abiotic stress, cell maintenance, and photosynthesis, as well as proteins of unknown function. In response to insect feeding, sorghum increased transcript abundance of numerous defense genes, with some SA-dependent pathogenesis-related genes responding to greenbug more strongly than to SA. In contrast, only weak induction of MeJA-regulated defense genes was observed after greenbug treatment. However, infestation tests confirmed that JA-regulated pathways were effective in plant defense against greenbugs. Activation of certain transcripts exclusively by greenbug infestation was observed, and may represent unique signal transduction events independent of JA- and SA-regulated pathways. Results indicate that plants coordinately regulate defense gene expression when attacked by phloem-feeding aphids, but also suggest that aphids are able to avoid triggering activation of some otherwise potentially effective plant defensive machinery, possibly through their particular mode of feeding.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
E. S. Villada, E. G. Gonzalez, A. I. Lopez-Sese, A. F. Castiel, and M. L. Gomez-Guillamon
Hypersensitive response to Aphis gossypii Glover in melon genotypes carrying the Vat gene
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2009;
60(11):
3269 - 3277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kutsukake, N. Nikoh, H. Shibao, C. Rispe, J.-C. Simon, and T. Fukatsu
Evolution of Soldier-Specific Venomous Protease in Social Aphids
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
December 1, 2008;
25(12):
2627 - 2641.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Girling, R. Madison, M. Hassall, G. M. Poppy, and J. G. Turner
Investigations into plant biochemical wound-response pathways involved in the production of aphid-induced plant volatiles
J. Exp. Bot.,
August 1, 2008;
59(11):
3077 - 3085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Singh, I. K. Singh, and P. K. Verma
Differential transcript accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. in response to a chewing insect Helicoverpa armigera and defence regulators correlate with reduced insect performance
J. Exp. Bot.,
June 1, 2008;
59(9):
2379 - 2392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Dutilleul, A. Jourdain, J. Bourguignon, and V. Hugouvieux
The Arabidopsis Putative Selenium-Binding Protein Family: Expression Study and Characterization of SBP1 as a Potential New Player in Cadmium Detoxification Processes
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2008;
147(1):
239 - 251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Zhu-Salzman, D. S. Luthe, and G. W. Felton
Arthropod-Inducible Proteins: Broad Spectrum Defenses against Multiple Herbivores
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2008;
146(3):
852 - 858.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Walling
Avoiding Effective Defenses: Strategies Employed by Phloem-Feeding Insects
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2008;
146(3):
859 - 866.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Rispe, M. Kutsukake, V. Doublet, S. Hudaverdian, F. Legeai, J.-C. Simon, D. Tagu, and T. Fukatsu
Large Gene Family Expansion and Variable Selective Pressures for Cathepsin B in Aphids
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
January 1, 2008;
25(1):
5 - 17.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. I. Zarate, L. A. Kempema, and L. L. Walling
Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2007;
143(2):
866 - 875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Kempema, X. Cui, F. M. Holzer, and L. L. Walling
Arabidopsis Transcriptome Changes in Response to Phloem-Feeding Silverleaf Whitefly Nymphs. Similarities and Distinctions in Responses to Aphids
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2007;
143(2):
849 - 865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Doering-Saad, H. Newbury, C. Couldridge, J. Bale, and J Pritchard
A phloem-enriched cDNA library from Ricinus: insights into phloem function
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2006;
57(12):
3183 - 3193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kehr
Phloem sap proteins: their identities and potential roles in the interaction between plants and phloem-feeding insects
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2006;
57(4):
767 - 774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Thompson and F. L. Goggin
Transcriptomics and functional genomics of plant defence induction by phloem-feeding insects
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2006;
57(4):
755 - 766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Y. Tang, R. E. Zielinski, A. R. Zangerl, A. R. Crofts, M. R. Berenbaum, and E. H. DeLucia
The differential effects of herbivory by first and fourth instars of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2006;
57(3):
527 - 536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Pegadaraju, C. Knepper, J. Reese, and J. Shah
Premature Leaf Senescence Modulated by the Arabidopsis PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 Gene Is Associated with Defense against the Phloem-Feeding Green Peach Aphid
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2005;
139(4):
1927 - 1934.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Salzman, J. A. Brady, S. A. Finlayson, C. D. Buchanan, E. J. Summer, F. Sun, P. E. Klein, R. R. Klein, L. H. Pratt, M.-M. Cordonnier-Pratt, et al.
Transcriptional Profiling of Sorghum Induced by Methyl Jasmonate, Salicylic Acid, and Aminocyclopropane Carboxylic Acid Reveals Cooperative Regulation and Novel Gene Responses
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2005;
138(1):
352 - 368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Klingler, R. Creasy, L. Gao, R. M. Nair, A. S. Calix, H. S. Jacob, O. R. Edwards, and K. B. Singh
Aphid Resistance in Medicago truncatula Involves Antixenosis and Phloem-Specific, Inducible Antibiosis, and Maps to a Single Locus Flanked by NBS-LRR Resistance Gene Analogs
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2005;
137(4):
1445 - 1455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Reymond, N. Bodenhausen, R. M.P. Van Poecke, V. Krishnamurthy, M. Dicke, and E. E. Farmer
A Conserved Transcript Pattern in Response to a Specialist and a Generalist Herbivore
PLANT CELL,
November 1, 2004;
16(11):
3132 - 3147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
