Plant Physiology Preview
Published on December 23, 2004; 10.1104/pp.104.050773
Received July 29, 2004
Returned for revision October 29, 2004
Accepted November 4, 2004
More Than a Leak Sealant. The Mechanical Properties of Callose in Pollen Tubes
Elodie Parre and Anja Geitmann *
Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1X 2B2
* Corresponding author; email: anja.geitmann{at}umontreal.ca.
While callose is a well-known permeability barrier and leak sealant in plant cells, it is largely unknown whether this cell wall polymer can also serve as a load-bearing structure. Since callose occurs in exceptionally large amounts in pollen, we assessed its role for resisting tension and compression stress in this cell. The effect of callose digestion in Solanum chacoense and Lilium orientalis pollen grains demonstrated that, depending on the species, this cell wall polymer represents a major stress-bearing structure at the aperture area of germinating grains. In the pollen tube, it is involved in cell wall resistance to circumferential tension stress, and despite its absence at the growing apex, callose is indirectly involved in the establishment of tension stress resistance in this area. To investigate whether or not callose is able to provide mechanical resistance against compression stress, we subjected pollen tubes to local deformation by microindentation. The data revealed that lowering the amount of callose resulted in reduced cellular stiffness and increased viscoelasticity, thus indicating clearly that callose is able to resist compression stress. Whether this function is relevant for pollen tube mechanics, however, is unclear, as stiffened growth medium caused a decrease in callose deposition. Together, our data provide clear evidence for the capacity of cell wall callose to resist tension and compression stress, thus demonstrating that this amorphous cell wall substance can have a mechanical role in growing plant cells.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
P. Apostolakos, P. Livanos, T. L. Nikolakopoulou, and B. Galatis
The role of callose in guard-cell wall differentiation and stomatal pore formation in the fern Asplenium nidus
Ann. Bot.,
December 1, 2009;
104(7):
1373 - 1387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Wolf, G. Mouille, and J. Pelloux
Homogalacturonan Methyl-Esterification and Plant Development
Mol Plant,
September 1, 2009;
2(5):
851 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Simpson, C. Thomas, K. Findlay, E. Bayer, and A. J. Maule
An Arabidopsis GPI-Anchor Plasmodesmal Neck Protein with Callose Binding Activity and Potential to Regulate Cell-to-Cell Trafficking
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2009;
21(2):
581 - 594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Williams
Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae) and the evolutionary developmental origins of the angiosperm progamic phase
Am. J. Botany,
January 1, 2009;
96(1):
144 - 165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Williams
Novelties of the flowering plant pollen tube underlie diversification of a key life history stage
PNAS,
August 12, 2008;
105(32):
11259 - 11263.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Persia, G. Cai, C. Del Casino, C. Faleri, M. T.M. Willemse, and M. Cresti
Sucrose Synthase Is Associated with the Cell Wall of Tobacco Pollen Tubes
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2008;
147(4):
1603 - 1618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Chen, N. Teng, X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Tang, J. Samaj, F. Baluska, and J. Lin
Disruption of Actin Filaments by Latrunculin B Affects Cell Wall Construction in Picea meyeri Pollen Tube by Disturbing Vesicle Trafficking
Plant Cell Physiol.,
January 1, 2007;
48(1):
19 - 30.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Geitmann
Experimental approaches used to quantify physical parameters at cellular and subcellular levels
Am. J. Botany,
October 1, 2006;
93(10):
1380 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Burgert
Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls
Am. J. Botany,
October 1, 2006;
93(10):
1391 - 1401.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
