Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology Preview
Published on January 28, 2005; 10.1104/pp.104.056861


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Plant Physiology Preview (PDF))
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
137/2/623    most recent
pp.104.056861v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meinnel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meinnel, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ross, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meinnel, T.

Received November 19, 2004
Returned for revision December 10, 2004
Accepted December 10, 2004

Functional and Developmental Impact of Cytosolic Protein N-Terminal Methionine Excision in Arabidopsis

Simon Ross , Carmela Giglione *, Michèle Pierre , Christelle Espagne , and Thierry Meinnel

Protein Maturation Group, Institut des Sciences du Végétal, Unité Propre de Recherche 2355, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France

* Corresponding author; email: giglione{at}isv.cnrs-gif.fr.

Protein N-terminal methionine (Met) excision (NME) is carried out by two types of Met aminopeptidases (MAPs), MAP1 and MAP2, in eukaryotes. Three enzymes, MAP1A, MAP2A, and MAP2B, have been identified in the cytoplasm of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). MAP transcript quantification revealed a predominance of MAP2B and developmental and organ-specific regulation of both MAP1A and MAP2s. By combining reverse genetics and reverse chemogenomics in transgenic plant lines, we have devised specific and reversible switches for the investigation of the role of cytoplasmic NME in Arabidopsis and of the respective contributions of the two types of cytoplasmic MAPs throughout development. dsRNA interference and knockout (KO) plant lines targeting either MAP1A alone or both MAP2s simultaneously were constructed and shown to display wild-type phenotypes. In the MAP1A KO context, modulating MAP2 activity by treatment with various concentrations of the specific drug fumagillin impaired plant development, with particularly strong effects on the root system. Reciprocally, complete MAP2 inhibition in various MAP1A knocked-down genetic backgrounds also generated a gradient of developmentally abnormal plants, but the effects on the root system were milder than in the KO context. In the absence of MAP2 activity, the severity of the phenotype in the MAP1A knocked-down lines was correlated to the extent of MAP1A mRNA accumulation. Complete cytoplasmic NME inactivation blocked development after plant germination. Thus, in plants, (1) cytoplasmic NME is essential; (2) MAP1A and MAP2s are functionally interchangeable, which is not the case in fungi and animals, as a complete block of either MAP-type activity does not cause any visible molecular or phenotypic effect; and (3) a minimal level of cytoplasmic MAP is required for normal development.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. Pierre, J. A. Traverso, B. Boisson, S. Domenichini, D. Bouchez, C. Giglione, and T. Meinnel
N-Myristoylation Regulates the SnRK1 Pathway in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2007; 19(9): 2804 - 2821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Fieulaine, C. Juillan-Binard, A. Serero, F. Dardel, C. Giglione, T. Meinnel, and J.-L. Ferrer
The Crystal Structure of Mitochondrial (Type 1A) Peptide Deformylase Provides Clear Guidelines for the Design of Inhibitors Specific for the Bacterial Forms
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42315 - 42324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Plant Biologists