|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology Preview Published on September 15, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.083642
Received May 15, 2006 Divergence of the Dof Gene Families in Poplar, Arabidopsis and Rice Suggests Multiple Modes of Gene Evolution after Duplication
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996; Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 * Corresponding author; email: zcheng{at}utk.edu.
It is widely accepted that gene duplication is a primary source of genetic novelty. However, the evolutionary fate of duplicated genes remains largely unresolved. The classical Ohno's Duplication-Retention-Non/Neofunctionalization (DRNNF) theory, and the recently proposed alternatives such as subfunctionalization (SF) or duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC), and subneofunctionalization (SNF), each can explain one or more aspects of gene fate after duplication. Duplicated genes are also affected by epigenetic changes. We constructed a phylogenetic tree using Dof (DNA-binding with one finger) protein sequences from poplar (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray ex Brayshaw), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). From the phylogenetic tree, we identified 27 pairs of paralogous Dof genes in the terminal nodes. Analysis of protein motif structure of the Dof paralogs and their ancestors revealed six different gene fates after gene duplication. Differential protein methylation was revealed between a pair of duplicated poplar Dof genes, which have identical motif structure and similar expression pattern, indicating that epigenetics is involved in evolution. Analysis of RT-PCR, MPSS (massively parallel signature sequencing) and microarray data revealed that the paralogs differ in expression pattern. Furthermore, analysis of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates indicated that divergence of the duplicated genes was driven by positive selection. About half of the motifs in Dof proteins were shared by non-Dof proteins in the three plants species, indicating that motif cooption may be one of the forces driving gene diversification. We provided evidence that the DRNNF, SF/DDC, and SNF hypotheses are complementary with, not alternative to, each other.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|