Plant Physiology Preview Published on December 22, 2006; 10.1104/pp.106.090662
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Received October 17, 2006
Accepted December 13, 2006
Arabidopsis Transcriptome Changes in Response to Phloem-feeding Silverleaf Whitefly Nymphs. Similarities and Distinctions in Responses to Aphids
Louisa A. Kempema , Xinping Cui , Frances M. Holzer , and Linda L. Walling *
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences; Department of Statistics, Center for Plant Cell Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA USA, 92521-0124
* Corresponding author; email: linda.walling{at}ucr.edu.
Phloem-feeding pests cause extensive crop damage throughout the world yet little is understood about how plants perceive and defend themselves from these threats. The silverleaf whitefly (SLWF; Bemisia tabaci type B) is a good model for studying phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions as SLWF nymphs cause little wounding and have a long, continuous interaction with the plant. Using the Arabidopsis ATH1 GeneChip, 700 transcripts were found to be up-regulated and 556 down-regulated by SLWF nymphs. Closer examination of the regulation of secondary metabolite (glucosinolate) and defense pathway genes after SLWF instar feeding shows that responses were qualitatively and quantitatively different from chewing insects. In addition to the RNA profile distinctions, analysis of SLWF performance on wild-type and pad4 mutants suggest aphid and SLWF interactions with Arabidopisis were distinct. While pad4-1 mutants were more susceptible to aphids, silverleaf whitefly development on pad4-1 and wild type plants was similar. Furthermore, although jasmonic acid genes were repressed and salicylic acid-regulated genes were induced after SLWF feeding, cytological staining of SLWF-infested tissue showed that pathogen defenses, such as localized cell death and hydrogen peroxide accumulation were not observed. Like aphid and fungal pathogens, a callose synthase gene RNAs accumulated and callose deposition was observed in SLWF-infested tissue. These results provide a more comprehensive understanding of phloem-feeding insect-plant interactions and distinguish silverleaf whitefly global responses.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Volodarsky, N. Leviatan, A. Otcheretianski, and R. Fluhr
HORMONOMETER: A Tool for Discerning Transcript Signatures of Hormone Action in the Arabidopsis Transcriptome
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2009;
150(4):
1796 - 1805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gosset, N. Harmel, C. Gobel, F. Francis, E. Haubruge, J.-P. Wathelet, P. du Jardin, I. Feussner, and M.-L. Fauconnier
Attacks by a piercing-sucking insect (Myzus persicae Sultzer) or a chewing insect (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) on potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) induce differential changes in volatile compound release and oxylipin synthesis
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2009;
60(4):
1231 - 1240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Nabity, J. A. Zavala, and E. H. DeLucia
Indirect suppression of photosynthesis on individual leaves by arthropod herbivory
Ann. Bot.,
February 1, 2009;
103(4):
655 - 663.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. Yang, M. Iwasaki, C. Machida, Y. Machida, X. Zhou, and N.-H. Chua
{beta}C1, the pathogenicity factor of TYLCCNV, interacts with AS1 to alter leaf development and suppress selective jasmonic acid responses
Genes & Dev.,
September 15, 2008;
22(18):
2564 - 2577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Girling, R. Madison, M. Hassall, G. M. Poppy, and J. G. Turner
Investigations into plant biochemical wound-response pathways involved in the production of aphid-induced plant volatiles
J. Exp. Bot.,
August 1, 2008;
59(11):
3077 - 3085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Koornneef, A. Leon-Reyes, T. Ritsema, A. Verhage, F. C. Den Otter, L.C. Van Loon, and C. M.J. Pieterse
Kinetics of Salicylate-Mediated Suppression of Jasmonate Signaling Reveal a Role for Redox Modulation
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2008;
147(3):
1358 - 1368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Singh, I. K. Singh, and P. K. Verma
Differential transcript accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. in response to a chewing insect Helicoverpa armigera and defence regulators correlate with reduced insect performance
J. Exp. Bot.,
June 1, 2008;
59(9):
2379 - 2392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hao, C. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Chen, M. Tang, B. Du, L. Zhu, and G. He
Herbivore-Induced Callose Deposition on the Sieve Plates of Rice: An Important Mechanism for Host Resistance
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2008;
146(4):
1810 - 1820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Zheng and M. Dicke
Ecological Genomics of Plant-Insect Interactions: From Gene to Community
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2008;
146(3):
812 - 817.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Zhu-Salzman, D. S. Luthe, and G. W. Felton
Arthropod-Inducible Proteins: Broad Spectrum Defenses against Multiple Herbivores
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2008;
146(3):
852 - 858.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Walling
Avoiding Effective Defenses: Strategies Employed by Phloem-Feeding Insects
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2008;
146(3):
859 - 866.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. I. Zarate, L. A. Kempema, and L. L. Walling
Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2007;
143(2):
866 - 875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|