|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology Preview Published on March 28, 2008; 10.1104/pp.108.118059
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Received February 19, 2008 Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome
Max-Planck-Institut fur Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, D-14424 Potsdam, Germany * Corresponding author; email: matthew.hannah{at}bayercropscience.com.
In plants, low temperature causes massive transcriptional changes, many of which are presumed to be involved in the process of cold acclimation. Given the diversity of developmental and environmental factors between experiments it is surprising their influence on the identification of cold-responsive genes is largely unknown. A systematic investigation of genes responding to one day of cold treatment revealed that diurnal and circadian-regulated genes are responsible for the majority of the substantial variation between experiments. This is contrary to the widespread assumption these effects are eliminated by using paired diurnal controls. To identify the molecular basis for this variation, we performed targeted expression analyses of diurnal and circadian time courses. We show that, after a short initial cold response, in diurnal conditions cold reduces the amplitude of cycles for clock components and dampens or disrupts the cycles of output genes, whilst in continuous light all cycles become arrhythmic. This means that genes identified as cold-responsive are dependent on the time-of-day the experiment was performed and that a control at normal temperature will not correct for this effect as it was postulated up to now. Time-of-day also affects the number and strength of expression changes for a large number of transcription factors and this likely further contributes to experimental differences. This reveals that interactions between cold and diurnal regulation are major factors in shaping the cold-responsive transcriptome and thus will be an important consideration in future experiments to dissect transcriptional regulatory networks controlling cold acclimation. In addition, our data revealed differential effects of cold on circadian output genes and a unique regulation of an oscillator component, suggesting that cold treatment could also be an important tool to probe circadian and diurnal regulatory mechanisms.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|