Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 1, 2003; 10.1104/pp.103.020602

Plant Physiology 132:988-998 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/2/988    most recent
pp.103.020602v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhullar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burma, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhullar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burma, P. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bhullar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burma, P. K.
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION

Strategies for Development of Functionally Equivalent Promoters with Minimum Sequence Homology for Transgene Expression in Plants: cis-Elements in a Novel DNA Context versus Domain Swapping1

Simran Bhullar, Suma Chakravarthy2,3, Sonia Advani2, Sudipta Datta, Deepak Pental and Pradeep Kumar Burma*

Department of Genetics, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi–110021, India

The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (35S) promoter has been extensively used for the constitutive expression of transgenes in dicotyledonous plants. The repetitive use of the same promoter is known to induce transgene inactivation due to promoter homology. As a way to circumvent this problem, we tested two different strategies for the development of synthetic promoters that are functionally equivalent but have a minimum sequence homology. Such promoters can be generated by (a) introducing known cis-elements in a novel or synthetic stretch of DNA or (b) "domain swapping," wherein domains of one promoter can be replaced with functionally equivalent domains from other heterologous promoters. We evaluated the two strategies for promoter modifications using domain A (consisting of minimal promoter and subdomain A1) of the 35S promoter as a model. A set of modified 35S promoters were developed whose strength was compared with the 35S promoter per se using {beta}-glucuronidase as the reporter gene. Analysis of the expression of the reporter gene in transient assay system showed that domain swapping led to a significant fall in promoter activity. In contrast, promoters developed by placing cis-elements in a novel DNA context showed levels of expression comparable with that of the 35S. Two promoter constructs Mod2A1T and Mod3A1T were then designed by placing the core sequences of minimal promoter and subdomain A1 in divergent DNA sequences. Transgenics developed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) with the two constructs and with 35S as control were used to assess the promoter activity in different tissues of primary transformants. Mod2A1T and Mod3A1T were found to be active in all of the tissues tested, at levels comparable with that of 35S. Further, the expression of the Mod2A1T promoter in the seedlings of the T1 generation was also similar to that of the 35S promoter. The present strategy opens up the possibility of creating a set of synthetic promoters with minimum sequence homology and with expression levels comparable with the wild-type prototype by modifying sequences present between cis-elements for transgene expression in plants.


Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.020602.

1 This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and by Dow AgroSciences (Indianapolis). S.B., S.C., and S.D. were supported by Research Fellowships from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India.

2 These authors contributed equally to the paper.

3 Present address: Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, NY 14853.

* Corresponding author; e-mail pburma{at}hotmail.com; fax 91–11–26885270.

Received January 18, 2003; returned for revision February 27, 2003; accepted March 4, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Q. Qu, Y. P. Xing, W. X. Liu, X. P. Xu, and Y. R. Song
Expression pattern and activity of six glutelin gene promoters in transgenic rice
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2417 - 2424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. V. Sawant, K. Kiran, R. Mehrotra, C. P. Chaturvedi, S. A. Ansari, P. Singh, N. Lodhi, and R. Tuli
A variety of synergistic and antagonistic interactions mediated by cis-acting DNA motifs regulate gene expression in plant cells and modulate stability of the transcription complex formed on a basal promoter
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2005; 56(419): 2345 - 2353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists