This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 133/4/1578    most recent pp.103.029694v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Plant Physiol. Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Markelz, N. H. Articles by Brutnell, T. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Markelz, N. H. Articles by Brutnell, T. P. Agricola Articles by Markelz, N. H. Articles by Brutnell, T. P.

Photomorphogenic Responses in Maize Seedling Development^1,[w]

Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853

As an emerging maize (Zea mays) seedling senses light, there is a decrease in the rate of mesocotyl elongation, an induction of root growth, and an expansion of leaves. In leaf tissues, mesophyll and bundle sheath cell fate is determined, and the proplastids of each differentiate into the dimorphic chloroplasts typical of each cell type. Although it has been inferred from recent studies in several model plant species that multiple photoreceptor systems mediate this process, surprisingly little is known of light signal transduction in maize. Here, we examine two photomorphogenic responses in maize: inhibition of mesocotyl elongation and C4 photosynthetic differentiation. Through an extensive survey of white, red, far-red, and blue light responses among a diverse collection of germplasm, including a phytochrome-deficient mutant elm1, we show that light response is a highly variable trait in maize. Although all inbreds examined appear to have a functional phytochrome signal transduction pathway, several lines showed reduced sensitivity to blue light. A significant correlation was observed between light response and subpopulation, suggesting that light responsiveness may be a target of artificial selection. An examination of C4 gene expression patterns under various light regimes in the standard W22 inbred and elm1 indicate that cell-specific patterns of C4 gene expression are maintained in fully differentiated tissues independent of light quality. To our knowledge, these findings represent the first comprehensive survey of light response in maize and are discussed in relation to maize breeding strategies.

¹ This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. IBN-0110297 to T.P.B. and GBN-9979516 to N.H.M.).

^[w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

^* Corresponding author; e-mail tpb8{at}cornell.edu; fax 607-254-1242.

Received July 7, 2003; returned for revision August 11, 2003; accepted September 15, 2003.

Related articles in Plant Physiol.:

Light Signaling

Edgar P. Spalding
Plant Physiol. 2003 133: 1417-1419. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Patel and J. O. Berry Rubisco gene expression in C4 plants J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1625 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Covshoff, W. Majeran, P. Liu, J. M. Kolkman, K. J. van Wijk, and T. P. Brutnell Deregulation of Maize C4 Photosynthetic Development in a Mesophyll Cell-Defective Mutant Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1469 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q.-S. Qiu, S. C. Hardin, J. Mace, T. P. Brutnell, and S. C. Huber Light and Metabolic Signals Control the Selective Degradation of Sucrose Synthase in Maize Leaves during Deetiolation Plant Physiology, May 1, 2007; 144(1): 468 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Offermann, T. Danker, D. Dreymuller, R. Kalamajka, S. Topsch, K. Weyand, and C. Peterhansel Illumination Is Necessary and Sufficient to Induce Histone Acetylation Independent of Transcriptional Activity at the C4-Specific Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Promoter in Maize Plant Physiology, July 1, 2006; 141(3): 1078 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jiao, L. Ma, E. Strickland, and X. W. Deng Conservation and Divergence of Light-Regulated Genome Expression Patterns during Seedling Development in Rice and Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, December 1, 2005; 17(12): 3239 - 3256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J.H. Sawers, P. J. Linley, J. F. Gutierrez-Marcos, T. Delli-Bovi, P. R. Farmer, T. Kohchi, M. J. Terry, and T. P. Brutnell The Elm1 (ZmHy2) Gene of Maize Encodes a Phytochromobilin Synthase Plant Physiology, September 1, 2004; 136(1): 2771 - 2781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Sheehan, P. R. Farmer, and T. P. Brutnell Structure and Expression of Maize Phytochrome Family Homeologs Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1395 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]