|
|
||||||||
|
First published online December 23, 2005; 10.1104/pp.105.067900 Plant Physiology 140:374-382 (2006) © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists
Analysis of Freeze-Thaw Embolism in Conifers. The Interaction between Cavitation Pressure and Tracheid Size1Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Ice formation in the xylem sap produces air bubbles that under negative xylem pressures may expand and cause embolism in the xylem conduits. We used the centrifuge method to evaluate the relationship between freeze-thaw embolism and conduit diameter across a range of xylem pressures (Px) in the conifers Pinus contorta and Juniperus scopulorum. Vulnerability curves showing loss of conductivity (embolism) with Px down to 8 MPa were generated with versus without superimposing a freeze-thaw treatment. In both species, the freeze-thaw plus water-stress treatment caused more embolism than water stress alone. We estimated the critical conduit diameter (Df) above which a tracheid will embolize due to freezing and thawing and found that it decreased from 35 µm at a Px of 0.5 MPa to 6 µm at 8 MPa. Further analysis showed that the proportionality between diameter of the air bubble nucleating the cavitation and the diameter of the conduit (kL) declined with increasingly negative Px. This suggests that the bubbles causing cavitation are smaller in proportion to tracheid diameter in narrow tracheids than in wider ones. A possible reason for this is that the rate of dissolving increases with bubble pressure, which is inversely proportional to bubble diameter (La Place's law). Hence, smaller bubbles shrink faster than bigger ones. Last, we used the empirical relationship between Px and Df to model the freeze-thaw response in conifer species.
1 This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (Dissertation Improvement Grant 0308862 to J.P. and NSFIBN0416297 to J.S.S.). J.P. gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. 2 Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 4007 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, CA 94720. 3 Present address: Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Jarmila Pittermann (pittermann{at}berkeley.edu). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.067900. * Corresponding author; e-mail pittermann{at}berkeley.edu; fax 5106436264. Received June 30, 2005; returned for revision September 27, 2005; accepted October 26, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|