|
|
||||||||
|
First published online March 23, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.099077 Plant Physiology 144:926-941 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Short- and Long-Term Operation of the Lutein-Epoxide Cycle in Light-Harvesting Antenna Complexes1,[W],[OA]Phytosphäre Institut (Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Juelich, Germany (S.M., C.B.O.); Laboratoire de Génétique et Biophysique des Plantes, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France (T.M., R.B.); Dipartimento Scientifico e Tecnologico, Università di Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy (R.B.); Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy (T.M.); and School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territories 0200, Australia (C.B.O.)
The lutein-5,6-epoxide (Lx) cycle operates in some plants between lutein (L) and its monoepoxide, Lx. Whereas recent studies have established the photoprotective roles of the analogous violaxanthin cycle, physiological functions of the Lx cycle are still unknown. In this article, we investigated the operation of the Lx cycle in light-harvesting antenna complexes (Lhcs) of Inga sapindoides Willd, a tropical tree legume accumulating substantial Lx in shade leaves, to identify the xanthophyll-binding sites involved in short- and long-term responses of the Lx cycle and to analyze the effects on light-harvesting efficiency. In shade leaves, Lx was converted into L upon light exposure, which then replaced Lx in the peripheral V1 site in trimeric Lhcs and the internal L2 site in both monomeric and trimeric Lhcs, leading to xanthophyll composition resembling sun-type Lhcs. Similar to the violaxanthin cycle, the Lx cycle was operating in both photosystems, yet the light-induced Lx
1 This work was supported in part by grants from the National Ministry for University and Research (grant no. FIRB RBLA0345SF_002) and the Trento Provincial Government (grant no. SAMBAx2 to R.B. and T.M.). 2 These authors contributed equally to the article. [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.099077 * Corresponding author; e-mail s.matsubara{at}fz-juelich.de; fax 492461612492. Received March 6, 2007; accepted March 16, 2007; published March 27, 2007.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|